<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBO: Baucus&#8217;s ObamaCare bill would reduce deficit by $81 billion over 10 years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medicare Exceeded Congress’ Cost Projections By 800% &#171; Conservative Thoughts and Profundity</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-3088198</link>
		<dc:creator>Medicare Exceeded Congress’ Cost Projections By 800% &#171; Conservative Thoughts and Profundity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-3088198</guid>
		<description>[...]   While the CBO has come out and scored the Baucus concepts at $829 billion it is worth noting, as HotAir points out, that Congress isn’t the most reliable source for “uncertain” projections like the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   While the CBO has come out and scored the Baucus concepts at $829 billion it is worth noting, as HotAir points out, that Congress isn’t the most reliable source for “uncertain” projections like the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flashback: Medicare Exceeded Congress’ Cost Projections By 800% &#171; Conservative Thoughts and Profundity</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2949172</link>
		<dc:creator>Flashback: Medicare Exceeded Congress’ Cost Projections By 800% &#171; Conservative Thoughts and Profundity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2949172</guid>
		<description>[...] the CBO has come out and scored the Baucus concepts at $829 billion it is worth noting, as HotAir points out, that Congress isn’t the most reliable source for “uncertain” projections like the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the CBO has come out and scored the Baucus concepts at $829 billion it is worth noting, as HotAir points out, that Congress isn’t the most reliable source for “uncertain” projections like the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JIMV</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2811390</link>
		<dc:creator>JIMV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2811390</guid>
		<description>The &#039;cost&#039; of the bill does not contain the costs to individuals and small business for the new mandate and assumes Congress really will cut medicare not just year one but every year in the future, which is a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;cost&#8217; of the bill does not contain the costs to individuals and small business for the new mandate and assumes Congress really will cut medicare not just year one but every year in the future, which is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blacksmith8</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2811339</link>
		<dc:creator>Blacksmith8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2811339</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

Hey folks - THERE IS NO BILL

NO bill has been produced

How does the CBO analyze a non existent bill

bestweather on October 8, 2009 at 3:14 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Legal Insurrection agrees with you. &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;THERE IS NO BILL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Hey folks &#8211; THERE IS NO BILL</p>
<p>NO bill has been produced</p>
<p>How does the CBO analyze a non existent bill</p>
<p>bestweather on October 8, 2009 at 3:14 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Legal Insurrection agrees with you. <strong><a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html" rel="nofollow">THERE IS NO BILL</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2811305</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2811305</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Meanwhile, Bob Dole puts the GOP on the back and urges them to sign&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Dole is 86 years old. I think he might be losing it. He also said a public option would be a disaster. So there you go...I don&#039;t think he really even gets what they are doing up there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Meanwhile, Bob Dole puts the GOP on the back and urges them to sign</p></blockquote>
<p>Dole is 86 years old. I think he might be losing it. He also said a public option would be a disaster. So there you go&#8230;I don&#8217;t think he really even gets what they are doing up there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBO estimates Senate Finance Health Care Bill Will Cost $829 Billion and will leave 25 million uninsured &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2811285</link>
		<dc:creator>CBO estimates Senate Finance Health Care Bill Will Cost $829 Billion and will leave 25 million uninsured &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2811285</guid>
		<description>[...] CBO is expected to release the cost on the health package that is currently awaiting a vote in the Senate Finance Committee, the aides said. Numerous changes will likely bring the cost to around $900 billion over ten years, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CBO is expected to release the cost on the health package that is currently awaiting a vote in the Senate Finance Committee, the aides said. Numerous changes will likely bring the cost to around $900 billion over ten years, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgealbert</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2811280</link>
		<dc:creator>georgealbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2811280</guid>
		<description>Anyone lending me 2 million dollars will get 22 million back in 34 years.  Please send your checks directly to me.  If you want I will give you a preliminary summary of the first draft of the outline that will be used for the draft spreasheet that will identify the proposed income statement that is dependent on 56 different variables coming out exactly as I am guessing.  But please send me the checks today as my first sentence should be sufficient proof for now that A.) I need the money and B.) I am predicting you will get it back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone lending me 2 million dollars will get 22 million back in 34 years.  Please send your checks directly to me.  If you want I will give you a preliminary summary of the first draft of the outline that will be used for the draft spreasheet that will identify the proposed income statement that is dependent on 56 different variables coming out exactly as I am guessing.  But please send me the checks today as my first sentence should be sufficient proof for now that A.) I need the money and B.) I am predicting you will get it back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blacksmith8</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2811277</link>
		<dc:creator>Blacksmith8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2811277</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
The internet is alive with the sound of people analyzing the CBO&#039;s &quot;scoring&quot; of the Max Baucus aka Senate Finance Committee Health Care Bill. Before everyone gets too deeply into their thoughts, please keep in mind the following (get ready, all CAPS, bold, indented signifies a really important concept):

&lt;strong&gt;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;

The CBO scored the concepts described by the Baucus Committee. There is no legislative text. None. Baucus and his Democratic colleagues refused to reduce their concepts to actual legislation prior to a vote. Here is the CBO&#039;s disclaimer:

    CBO and JCT’s analysis is preliminary in large part because the Chairman’s mark, as amended, has not yet been embodied in legislative language.

The Baucus Concepts are disasterous, but that&#039;s for another post. For this post, let me get across a simple concept: &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

Your esteemed Senators on the Senate Finance Committee will not be voting on legislation because &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.

Your esteemed Senators have so little respect for you that some of them are willing to vote in favor of legislation which does not exist because &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.

The actual legislation will be drafted in secret by Harry Reid and a few other people, including staffers whose names and political connections you never will know, and the resulting legislation will be rammed through the Senate and House before anyone gets to read and analyze it.

Months of debate mean nothing. It&#039;s all smoke and mirrors by people who think you are too stupid to realize what is going on.

Have I made myself clear on this? &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.
h/t &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Legal Insurrection&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html" rel="nofollow">THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL</a></strong><br />
The internet is alive with the sound of people analyzing the CBO&#8217;s &#8220;scoring&#8221; of the Max Baucus aka Senate Finance Committee Health Care Bill. Before everyone gets too deeply into their thoughts, please keep in mind the following (get ready, all CAPS, bold, indented signifies a really important concept):</p>
<p><strong>    <a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html" rel="nofollow">THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL.</a> </strong></p>
<p>The CBO scored the concepts described by the Baucus Committee. There is no legislative text. None. Baucus and his Democratic colleagues refused to reduce their concepts to actual legislation prior to a vote. Here is the CBO&#8217;s disclaimer:</p>
<p>    CBO and JCT’s analysis is preliminary in large part because the Chairman’s mark, as amended, has not yet been embodied in legislative language.</p>
<p>The Baucus Concepts are disasterous, but that&#8217;s for another post. For this post, let me get across a simple concept: <strong><a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html" rel="nofollow">THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL</a></strong></p>
<p>Your esteemed Senators on the Senate Finance Committee will not be voting on legislation because <strong><a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html" rel="nofollow">THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL</a></strong>.</p>
<p>Your esteemed Senators have so little respect for you that some of them are willing to vote in favor of legislation which does not exist because <strong><a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html" rel="nofollow">THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL</a></strong>.</p>
<p>The actual legislation will be drafted in secret by Harry Reid and a few other people, including staffers whose names and political connections you never will know, and the resulting legislation will be rammed through the Senate and House before anyone gets to read and analyze it.</p>
<p>Months of debate mean nothing. It&#8217;s all smoke and mirrors by people who think you are too stupid to realize what is going on.</p>
<p>Have I made myself clear on this? <strong><a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html" rel="nofollow">THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL</a></strong>.<br />
h/t <strong><a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/there-is-no-baucus-bill.html" rel="nofollow">Legal Insurrection</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Runny Eggs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The doctors who don&#8217;t need to play dress-up</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2811242</link>
		<dc:creator>No Runny Eggs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The doctors who don&#8217;t need to play dress-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2811242</guid>
		<description>[...] your watches on the Left Coast). They&#8217;ll likely be talking about the Baucus non-bill and the CBO&#8217;s scoring of said [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your watches on the Left Coast). They&#8217;ll likely be talking about the Baucus non-bill and the CBO&#8217;s scoring of said [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bestweather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2811099</link>
		<dc:creator>bestweather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2811099</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hey folks - &lt;em&gt;THERE IS NO BILL&lt;/em&gt;

NO bill has been produced 

How does the CBO analyze a non existent bill&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hey folks &#8211; <em>THERE IS NO BILL</em></p>
<p>NO bill has been produced </p>
<p>How does the CBO analyze a non existent bill</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: entagor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810992</link>
		<dc:creator>entagor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810992</guid>
		<description>Everyone go to the Headliner &#039;There is no Baucus Bill&#039; to see how the left almost pulled off this sham of having the CBO score a bill that does not exist.

They gave the CBO a line about what they bill would &#039;accomplish&#039; and the CBO cranked out numbers which were to be run to the press to prove the unwritten bill will save our nation

I cannot remember a greater fraud in an era of gigantic frauds and they almost pulled it off. Thanks to all the bloggers including Legal Insurrection, who are moving to get out the word. 
The lying isn&#039;t finished even on the CBO shell game. 

I do not blame CBO at this stage, although I would like to find out if there were preliminary correspindances concerning the scoring of the unwritten package. Who moved first on this recent scoring, and what, exactly were they tabulating on? 

We need to see the printout CBO used as their description of the Bill to do their scoring and we need to know who supplied that printout. We may never know if the CBO was engaged in feedback to clip or trim the base &#039;legislation&#039; to get the numbers needed by the spinners to con the public</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone go to the Headliner &#8216;There is no Baucus Bill&#8217; to see how the left almost pulled off this sham of having the CBO score a bill that does not exist.</p>
<p>They gave the CBO a line about what they bill would &#8216;accomplish&#8217; and the CBO cranked out numbers which were to be run to the press to prove the unwritten bill will save our nation</p>
<p>I cannot remember a greater fraud in an era of gigantic frauds and they almost pulled it off. Thanks to all the bloggers including Legal Insurrection, who are moving to get out the word.<br />
The lying isn&#8217;t finished even on the CBO shell game. </p>
<p>I do not blame CBO at this stage, although I would like to find out if there were preliminary correspindances concerning the scoring of the unwritten package. Who moved first on this recent scoring, and what, exactly were they tabulating on? </p>
<p>We need to see the printout CBO used as their description of the Bill to do their scoring and we need to know who supplied that printout. We may never know if the CBO was engaged in feedback to clip or trim the base &#8216;legislation&#8217; to get the numbers needed by the spinners to con the public</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810968</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810968</guid>
		<description>Now compare it to H.R.3400...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now compare it to H.R.3400&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: entagor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810967</link>
		<dc:creator>entagor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810967</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Meanwhile, Bob Dole puts the GOP on the back and urges them to sign&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I connit express ecough my total contempt for Bob Dole. 

His Americans with Disabilities Act, inspired because he had fuzzy feelings about himself and his struggles, has messed up our nation into a spider web of litagation. Businesses can no longer rent the store upstairs, because without an elevator they will be sued. I still see these vacant once great startup locations around my town. Our public buses had to install lifts for wheelchairs which at any stop can involve ten minutes delay to run the elevator, impeding the commute of the low income people who depend on the bus to get them to work. I have been on these buses, it is a mess and the maintenance on the systems exceeds the wealth of my location. His act changed the disabled into folk we fear, serve and avoid when possible. 

Dole thought he deserved the Presidency as a reward for service, and got himself nominated as one more undesirable candidate to anyone except his buddies in the cloakroom

Now he focuses his nation destroying abilities on our healthcare system. The guy runs on feelings, not sense, and I am out of empathy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Meanwhile, Bob Dole puts the GOP on the back and urges them to sign</p></blockquote>
<p>I connit express ecough my total contempt for Bob Dole. </p>
<p>His Americans with Disabilities Act, inspired because he had fuzzy feelings about himself and his struggles, has messed up our nation into a spider web of litagation. Businesses can no longer rent the store upstairs, because without an elevator they will be sued. I still see these vacant once great startup locations around my town. Our public buses had to install lifts for wheelchairs which at any stop can involve ten minutes delay to run the elevator, impeding the commute of the low income people who depend on the bus to get them to work. I have been on these buses, it is a mess and the maintenance on the systems exceeds the wealth of my location. His act changed the disabled into folk we fear, serve and avoid when possible. </p>
<p>Dole thought he deserved the Presidency as a reward for service, and got himself nominated as one more undesirable candidate to anyone except his buddies in the cloakroom</p>
<p>Now he focuses his nation destroying abilities on our healthcare system. The guy runs on feelings, not sense, and I am out of empathy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810882</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810882</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
TheVer:

I think you are a Moby. I really do.

Terrye on October 8, 2009 at 1:23 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Agreed...good call...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
TheVer:</p>
<p>I think you are a Moby. I really do.</p>
<p>Terrye on October 8, 2009 at 1:23 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed&#8230;good call&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xblade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810855</link>
		<dc:creator>xblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810855</guid>
		<description>Not sure why this is supposed to be good news. Deficit neutral or not, it&#039;s still nearly a trillion dollars in increased spending(which means it will be 2 trillion plus). That money has to come from somewhere, and will most likely be stolen from others in the form of higher taxes. That&#039;s 1 trillion(cough 2 trillion cough) dollars taken out of the private sector that won&#039;t be available for job creation, innovation, new medical treatments, business start-ups, etc, that will instead go to deadbeats like AnninCa because they choose to spend their money elsewhere. 

Man, do I hate libs. Is there anyone more ignorant, immoral, and despicable than the average liberal? A pox on all your houses, you freakin&#039; morons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why this is supposed to be good news. Deficit neutral or not, it&#8217;s still nearly a trillion dollars in increased spending(which means it will be 2 trillion plus). That money has to come from somewhere, and will most likely be stolen from others in the form of higher taxes. That&#8217;s 1 trillion(cough 2 trillion cough) dollars taken out of the private sector that won&#8217;t be available for job creation, innovation, new medical treatments, business start-ups, etc, that will instead go to deadbeats like AnninCa because they choose to spend their money elsewhere. </p>
<p>Man, do I hate libs. Is there anyone more ignorant, immoral, and despicable than the average liberal? A pox on all your houses, you freakin&#8217; morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ne0365</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810844</link>
		<dc:creator>ne0365</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810844</guid>
		<description>Just want to clarify something.....THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just want to clarify something&#8230;..THERE IS NO BAUCUS BILL !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dasher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810805</link>
		<dc:creator>Dasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810805</guid>
		<description>The most ominous words you will hear from a politician; &quot;We have to do something!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most ominous words you will hear from a politician; &#8220;We have to do something!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Vampire Bill &#8212; it Will Not Die Well &#171; Temple of Mut</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810800</link>
		<dc:creator>The Vampire Bill &#8212; it Will Not Die Well &#171; Temple of Mut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810800</guid>
		<description>[...] As I am part Romanian, vampire lore is of special interest. In light of the news out there today (supposed deficit reduction; false promises of &#8220;opt-outs&#8221; to tempt moderates and false numbers to tempt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I am part Romanian, vampire lore is of special interest. In light of the news out there today (supposed deficit reduction; false promises of &#8220;opt-outs&#8221; to tempt moderates and false numbers to tempt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ris4victory</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810740</link>
		<dc:creator>Ris4victory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810740</guid>
		<description>So if I buy a 90K Porsche, marked down from 95K, then I am actually getting a better deal than if I bought the 25K Malibu?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if I buy a 90K Porsche, marked down from 95K, then I am actually getting a better deal than if I bought the 25K Malibu?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheVer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810732</link>
		<dc:creator>TheVer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810732</guid>
		<description>Moby?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moby?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810718</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810718</guid>
		<description>TheVer:

I think you are a Moby. I really do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TheVer:</p>
<p>I think you are a Moby. I really do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810713</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810713</guid>
		<description>Ann:

I tell you what will work with Independents: a deficit that is 9.9% of GDP. Independents tend to get pretty upset about trillion dollar deficits and higher taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann:</p>
<p>I tell you what will work with Independents: a deficit that is 9.9% of GDP. Independents tend to get pretty upset about trillion dollar deficits and higher taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheVer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810670</link>
		<dc:creator>TheVer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810670</guid>
		<description>somebody needs to call in an alpha-strike on capitol hill with as many smart munitions as we have available-it will help one way or another- perferably at 8pm on a tuesday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>somebody needs to call in an alpha-strike on capitol hill with as many smart munitions as we have available-it will help one way or another- perferably at 8pm on a tuesday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archimedes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810610</link>
		<dc:creator>Archimedes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810610</guid>
		<description>A while back I stipulated the following.....

&lt;em&gt;This demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of what the “recociliation” process really means. “Recociliation was adopted as a an optional practice to be employed under the “Pay-Go” rules to limit deficit spending. To reconcile in this sense is to reconcile spending with revenues.

Explicit in langauge adopted to invoke “reconciliation” protocols is that the bill in question must reduce the deficit, or at a minimum be “revenue neutral.”

This why I think we saw so much pressure by Orszag and the House leadership on CBO cheif Elmendorf, when Elmendorf put out candid CBO numbers on Obamacare he essentially was depriving the Dem’s from being able to invoke the weapon of”reconciliation.”

Dean is Either bluffing or the DNC is holding Elmendorf’s children in “an undisclosed secure location” in ransom against serious budget fudging.&lt;/em&gt;
Archimedes on August 17, 2009 at 7:54 PM


&lt;strong&gt;Has anyone seen Elmendorf&#039;s kids recently?&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while back I stipulated the following&#8230;..</p>
<p><em>This demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of what the “recociliation” process really means. “Recociliation was adopted as a an optional practice to be employed under the “Pay-Go” rules to limit deficit spending. To reconcile in this sense is to reconcile spending with revenues.</p>
<p>Explicit in langauge adopted to invoke “reconciliation” protocols is that the bill in question must reduce the deficit, or at a minimum be “revenue neutral.”</p>
<p>This why I think we saw so much pressure by Orszag and the House leadership on CBO cheif Elmendorf, when Elmendorf put out candid CBO numbers on Obamacare he essentially was depriving the Dem’s from being able to invoke the weapon of”reconciliation.”</p>
<p>Dean is Either bluffing or the DNC is holding Elmendorf’s children in “an undisclosed secure location” in ransom against serious budget fudging.</em><br />
Archimedes on August 17, 2009 at 7:54 PM</p>
<p><strong>Has anyone seen Elmendorf&#8217;s kids recently?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjshaka</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/07/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-deficit-by-81-billion-over-10-years/comment-page-5/#comment-2810571</link>
		<dc:creator>jjshaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68269#comment-2810571</guid>
		<description>So basically what this is a giant tax scam with big Medicare cuts facilitated by the MSM and echoed by a panicky Rinopundit. On a draft no less!
Thanks to Dr.K for doing the basic research. I&#039;ll take him in a foxhole when it gets tough, not Mr. GULP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically what this is a giant tax scam with big Medicare cuts facilitated by the MSM and echoed by a panicky Rinopundit. On a draft no less!<br />
Thanks to Dr.K for doing the basic research. I&#8217;ll take him in a foxhole when it gets tough, not Mr. GULP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
