Steve Schmidt: Nominating Palin would be “catastrophic” for the GOP; Update: Video added

posted at 11:10 am on October 2, 2009 by Allahpundit

Despite his denials, he and Nicolle Wallace have always been prime suspects in the leaks aimed at her by unnamed McCain staffers, thanks in part to tense campaign-era e-mail exchanges between Palin and Schmidt having magically appeared in print a few months ago. I guess he figures he’s going to take a beating in her new book, so here he is landing the first punch:

“I think that she has talents, but my honest view is that she would not be a winning candidate for the Republican candidate in 2012, and in fact, were she to be the nominee, we would have a catastrophic election result.”

“In the year since the election has ended, she has done nothing to expand her appeal beyond the base. … Th[e] independent vote is going to be up for grabs in 2012. That middle of the electorate is going to be determinative of the outcome of the elections. I just don’t see that if you look at the things she has done over the year… that she is going to expand that base in the middle.”

Schmidt is the highest ranking former member of McCain’s inner circle to openly criticize Palin. He has largely remain silent since the election, being one of the few McCain staff members privy to entire vice presidential selection process. Partisan political allies have blamed Schmidt for unflattering leaks — including the famous, unattributed quote that Palin had “gone rogue” in the final weeks of the campaign. Schmidt has denied being the source of the leaks, though he has acknowledged tensions with Palin during the campaign.

There’ll be no such thing as a “catastrophic” GOP nominee so long as unemployment remains in the toilet, which, given today’s worse-than-expected numbers — including a real rate of 17 percent if you include “discouraged workers” — it looks set to do for a bad long awhile. Here’s the obligatory link to the updated chart at Innocent Bystanders comparing the actual rate to The One’s moronic pre-stimulus fantasyland projections. Note that the White House has unemployment projected for 5.5 percent or so in late 2012, a number that’s likely to haunt them during the next campaign. So long as things are this tough, Obama won’t have a cakewalk against anyone, Palin included.

But that avoids Schmidt’s basic point, i.e. would nominating Palin give The One a better chance than nominating someone else? She does have trouble with independents, although she may be in the process of addressing that by refashioning herself as a strong-form libertarian. She has huge problems with women. And given the image that’s taken hold of her, in Krauthammer’s words, as someone unduly dependent on “platitudes and cliches,” nominating her would turn an election that’s supposed to be a referendum on Obama’s first term into a referendum on whether Sarah Palin knows what she’s talking about. Every misstep and error when discussing policy on the trail will be magnified through the lens of the Tina Fey “I can see Russia from my house” nonsense; the Democrats and the media will frame her as a female Dan Quayle and contrast Obama’s four years of presidential experience with centrists’ doubts about her qualifications. It’s not that she’ll have to be able to talk policy as fluently as any other candidate, she’ll have to be able to talk about it more fluently to scrub the media image of her as an ignoramus. It’s not impossible but … it’s tough.

Schmidt obviously realizes, though, that she’ll have huge right-wing grassroots/media support in the primary; read down towards the end of the Atlantic piece linked above and you’ll find him warning that “The leadership of the party cannot be outsourced to the conservative-entertainment complex.” Does the “conservative-entertainment complex” really have that much power, though? Exit quotation:

The rise of Beck, Hannity, Bill O’Reilly and the rest has correlated almost perfectly with the decline of the G.O.P. But it’s not because the talk jocks have real power. It’s because they have illusory power, because Republicans hear the media mythology and fall for it every time.

Update: Here’s the clip of Schmidt, anticipating that he’ll come off in Palin’s book as “anti-rogue.”

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

The rise of Beck, Hannity, Bill O’Reilly and the rest has correlated almost perfectly with the decline of the G.O.P. But it’s not because the talk jocks have real power. It’s because they have illusory power, because Republicans hear the media mythology and fall for it every time.

Misreading the American conservative at large again.

The “GOP” has lost power because it is tone deaf to the normal every day American conservative who keeps telling them to quit spending and trying to buy votes from people who would rather have the old message. Dhimmicrats and Republicans both believe the only way to win elections is to buy enough swing votes to win. Both tend to neglect their base once the primaries are over in a chase to win the Hispanic votes and the independents. This is stupid.

The vast majority of Americans want their country run the way their households should be run. Save our money. Educate our kids. Defend our citizenry from harm. And stop giving stuff away to people who don’t deserve it or work for it in judgments, verdicts, and welfare.

The rise of Beck, Hannity, O’Reilly, Limbaugh has coincided with the disenfranchisement of exactly the people the Republican party used to represent, but whom they left behind in search of ever more stupid ways to buy Hispanic and independent votes. Those folks have to live here too. Save America first, then worry about whether the Hispanics and independents are following your lead. Idiots.

This is all about strategy to win a certain election. Instead, build a winning movement, with a common sense message (like conservative fiscal sense with a conservative, but laissez faire attitude towards social issues) and voters will flock to your flag. Stand for something and stick with it. Jackasses.

Mr. Schmidt is an idiot.

Subsunk

Subsunk on October 2, 2009 at 12:04 PM

djn on October 2, 2009 at 12:02 PM

Thanks for sharing that. I am sick of the losers who lost our country going after her. Palin and Beck are standing above the crowd and becoming courageous targets. I may not be their biggest fan, but they’ve earned my respect.

eaglesdontflock on October 2, 2009 at 12:07 PM

So in a day when Obama loses the Olympics bid, David Letter… is getting the other share of the headlines, Sarah’s book cover is all over the net–on this day Steve Schmidt decides to go after Sarah as a viable political force. No one will here what he had to say except the die hard political nutcases, like me. And I don’t care what he has to say. Great timing Schmidt.

bestwins on October 2, 2009 at 12:09 PM

Schmidt ran a Presidential campaign? Really? No wonder they lost.

eaglesdontflock on October 2, 2009 at 12:09 PM

Man, I really hope Sarah really rips this a**hole Schmidt a new one in her book. Same goes for Nicole Wallace.

I am so done with these RINO bastards. That’s one reason I could never support Pawlenty or Romney. Both are probably decent men, but they surround themselves with these RINO excrements.

Never again.

Norwegian on October 2, 2009 at 12:10 PM

Steve Schmidt, a loser, is lecturing the GOP??

Steve Schmidt is a EPIC A-HOLE.

cubachi on October 2, 2009 at 12:10 PM

Reposting this:

http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/gop-war-over-palin-limbaugh-blasts-mccain-advisers-as-losers-for-slamming-sarah

Asked for comment, Rush emailed:

I think it’s time for the McCain crowd to acknowledge they are losers and pack it in. They’ve done enough damage to the Republican Party. Move aside and let a brighter, more principled, and more competent generation of people clean up the mess they helped create.

Enoxo on October 2, 2009 at 12:11 PM

So in a day when Obama loses the Olympics bid, David Letter… is getting the other share of the headlines, Sarah’s book cover is all over the net–on this day Steve Schmidt decides to go after Sarah as a viable political force. No one will here what he had to say except the die hard political nutcases, like me. And I don’t care what he has to say. Great timing Schmidt.

bestwins on October 2, 2009 at 12:09 PM

spellcheck: hear

bestwins on October 2, 2009 at 12:14 PM

Midas on October 2, 2009 at 11:30 AM

Had the internet been around in 1961 then much of what you wrote about Palin would have been written about Richard “You won’t have me to kick around” Nixon. How did those “he’s unelectable” statements work out then. Humphrey cleaned his clock right. Oops I believe it was the other way around. I’m not a fan of Nixon but I am also not a fan of doom and gloom pronostications.

chemman on October 2, 2009 at 12:14 PM

Sounds like Schmidt was upset with Sarah for pulling larger crowds than his boss, so he mishandled her for those interviews. Maybe there’s a bit of misogyny there as well.

Catastrophic is what happened to the GOP in the 2006 & 2008 elections. We need to get back to the conservative principles that made our nation great.

Tennman on October 2, 2009 at 12:14 PM

The Palin-bots will only chalk Schmidt up as another “RINO” now…he *gasp* criticized Saint Sarah!

It is nice to see some conservatives like me with some common sense left.

:P

JetBoy on October 2, 2009 at 12:15 PM

No wonder McCain lost!

d1carter on October 2, 2009 at 12:17 PM

Sounds like Schmidt was upset with Sarah for pulling larger crowds than his boss, so he mishandled her for those interviews. Maybe there’s a bit of misogyny there as well.

You guys so quickly forget who it was who not only chose Sarah PAlin as a runningmate, but by doing so, put her in the national spotlight to begin with.

Heck, she even ripped off McCain’s “Maverick” with her book title “Going Rogue”. “Rogue”, huh? Where could that have come from?

JetBoy on October 2, 2009 at 12:17 PM

It is nice to see some conservatives like me with some common sense left.

:P

JetBoy on October 2, 2009 at 12:15 PM

JetBoy on October 2, 2009 at 12:17 PM

Troll.

atheling on October 2, 2009 at 12:19 PM

People like Schmidt make me never want to vote GOP again. If they put another moderate/RINO on top of the ticket again, screw them. I’m voting Libertarian or Constitutional.

And if that puts Obama back in the White House, so be it. America will deserve another Obama term for being too stupid to put a real conservative reformer in the WH.

atheling on October 2, 2009 at 12:22 PM

Heck, she even ripped off McCain’s “Maverick” with her book title “Going Rogue”. “Rogue”, huh? Where could that have come from?

JetBoy on October 2, 2009 at 12:17 PM

It came from Schmidt and Wallace smearing her as “going rogue” during the campaign and talking about Bill Ayers–trying to say it was her fault their campaign was talking about it, when she was simply doing what they asked her to do.

She took their smear, and turned it into something positive.

Enoxo on October 2, 2009 at 12:23 PM

I don’t like Schmidt or Palin.

davenp35 on October 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM

And if that puts Obama back in the White House, so be it.

Thats nice.

Let America go down in flames because you’d prefer to pout in your corner. Sheesh.

JetBoy on October 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Stevie was catastrophic for the GOP! Man up Steve.

lonestar1 on October 2, 2009 at 12:27 PM

Why is AP publishing so early in the AM? I need my substantial analysis from Ed before my fluffy Behar/Letterman/Palin-bashing stuff. Oh well, there’s always Powerline for the day….

And just to head you off, AP… “terrific“

jwehman on October 2, 2009 at 11:15 AM

I think Ed is speaking somewhere today, so AP must be doing the main page early shift.

I am with you–I need to read Ed’s substance before AP’s afternoon snark and drive-by hits on Sarah Palin. Um, no thanks.

conservative pilgrim on October 2, 2009 at 12:27 PM

***
Sarah Palin is a lot smarter than the AVERAGE BEAR–or the average RINO / DimocRAT / liberal / socialist / statist / marxist / communist politician. Some AVERAGE AMERICANS and those who didn’t do their homework when the Messiah burst on the scene put him in office. They now see that President Obama has no clothes and will vote him out in 2012.
***
Sarah Palin doesn’t need the Left Wing Media (aka AMERICAN PRAVDA) to put her in office. She is avoiding them and going directly to the normal people in this country via her book and the internet. She will clean President Obama’s (PBUH) clock in 2012 when the fruits of The One’s bad economic and foreign policy decisions really kick in.
***
SARAH’CUDA for POTUS–JOHN BOLTON for VP. An AMERICA FIRST ticket with real Hope and Change for the American People. She is the only politician I have seen who is a real conservative and who can win.
***
John Bibb
***

rocketman on October 2, 2009 at 12:29 PM

She and McCain are still claiming Iraq invasion was a good idea.

No it wasn’t.

We need a republican for 2012 who is willing to acknowledge that Iraq was a dumb *** idea like Ron Paul.

Spathi on October 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM

There’ll be no such thing as a “catastrophic” GOP nominee so long as unemployment remains in the toilet, which, given today’s worse-than-expected numbers — including a real rate of 17 percent if you include “discouraged workers” — it looks set to do for a bad long awhile. Here’s the obligatory link to the updated chart at Innocent Bystanders comparing the actual rate to The One’s moronic pre-stimulus fantasyland projections. Note that the White House has unemployment projected for 5.5 percent or so in late 2012, a number that’s likely to haunt them during the next campaign. So long as things are this tough, Obama won’t have a cakewalk against anyone, Palin included.
But that avoids Schmidt’s basic point, i.e. would nominating Palin give The One a better chance than nominating someone else? She does have trouble with independents, although she may be in the process of addressing that by refashioning herself as a strong-form libertarian.

I see her as sort of a blank slate. A blank slate with good instincts, horrible interviewing skills, and an excelent team from what I have seen. She’s tapping into some real fire power and it’s making my mouth water.

I see her most able to redefine the GOP to the Conservative party and not the conservative party to use Buckley’s terms.

Now you’ve just pointed out, 2012 will be up for grabs. Even Palin has a shot. But Palin also has the opportunity to grow, I think she will. There is a good chance she has a real shot.

So take all those strong points of Palin, and add in every lefty head exploding from coast to coast. I will love every moment of mouth foaming madness she will elicit. Palin is just a candidate, she is revenge on the left.

jhffmn on October 2, 2009 at 12:31 PM

Would this be the same Steve Schmidt who failed to run a successful campaign against a candidate with NO EXPERIENCE and RADICAL CLOSE FRIENDS and a HORRIBLE VOTING RECORD!

Why does his opinion matter to anyone?

Stephanie on October 2, 2009 at 12:31 PM

Update: Another potential scapegoat to go along with Michael Jordan: School violence.

To cover himself, Obama sent TWO Cabinet members to Chicago in the wake of the recent murder. Yes, this is a CYA because murders like that happen frequently, daily, in Chicago.

conservative pilgrim on October 2, 2009 at 12:33 PM

It is nice to see some conservatives like me with some common sense left.

:P

JetBoy on October 2, 2009 at 12:15 PM

Poor Jetboy. Conservatives like you are best left to fawning over Orangeman Crist.

Leave common sense conservatism to people who know how to use it.

portlandon on October 2, 2009 at 12:33 PM

Steve Schmidt? Who the f*^k is he???

alwyr on October 2, 2009 at 12:33 PM

You guys so quickly forget. . .

JetBoy on October 2, 2009 at 12:17 PM

Hey, I’m not a one-issue wonder like some around here. I was making a comment about Schmidt, not McCain.

Maybe someone should pull his head out of his nozzles.

Tennman on October 2, 2009 at 12:34 PM

Not only do we need to get Rinos out of office, we need to punish candidates that hire losers like Schmidt. We need candidates with principles that surround themselves with principled people.

huckleberryfriend on October 2, 2009 at 12:39 PM

conservative pilgrim on October 2, 2009 at 12:33 PM

Sorry! Wrong thread.

conservative pilgrim on October 2, 2009 at 12:39 PM

By the time 2012 rolls around, people will be laughing at saying “remember when some thought Sarah Palin was going to get the nom?“.

I don’t know who will get the nom in 2012, but it sure as won’t be Sarah Palin. Unless, you want to see Palin get rolled like Mondale did in 1984.

Moesart on October 2, 2009 at 12:44 PM

Let America go down in flames because you’d prefer to pout in your corner. Sheesh.

JetBoy on October 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Nope. I’m not going to pout. I’m just not going to support a party that has nothing but contempt for me, my values, and the Constitution. And since you’re one of the ass wipes who see nothing wrong with that, the blame belongs to you.

atheling on October 2, 2009 at 12:44 PM

Steve Schmidt? Who the f*^k is he???

alwyr on October 2, 2009 at 12:33 PM

Exactly…ask 1,000 people on the streets and no one would know who he is…ask anyone who Palin is…
This is a little known fact…campaign managers only cast one vote, so Sarah has risked the chance of losing one vote with this book.

right2bright on October 2, 2009 at 12:44 PM

You’re a bit late to the troll dance today, JetBoy. Wassa matter…alarm clock fail you, like your Dear Leader just did?

I don’t like Schmidt or Palin.

davenp35 on October 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Thanks for sharing. But why are you here then?

ornery_independent on October 2, 2009 at 12:46 PM

There’ll be no such thing as a “catastrophic” GOP nominee so long as unemployment remains in the toilet, which, given today’s worse-than-expected numbers — including a real rate of 17 percent if you include “discouraged workers” — it looks set to do for a bad long awhile.

So what is the GOP “solution” to it? The standard “tax cuts” answer is not the solution.

Ridiculing Obama every day on talk radio is not the answer. So what is the solution? Remember that if the GOP wins, they will have to solve problems instead of throwing bricks from the sidelines. Throwing bricks from the sidelines is a much easier thing to do and more desirable.

Remember that winning power means you actually have to do stuff and not just talk. The GOP is good at bashing their opponents, not solving problems.

Decider on October 2, 2009 at 12:47 PM

Heck, she even ripped off McCain’s “Maverick” with her book title “Going Rogue”. “Rogue”, huh? Where could that have come from?

JetBoy on October 2, 2009 at 12:17 PM

What, JetBoy you are usually somewhat lucid in your posts, but this one is really a stretch…take a nap, get some sleep, that just doesn’t make sense.

right2bright on October 2, 2009 at 12:47 PM

We need candidates with principles that surround themselves with principled people.

huckleberryfriend on October 2, 2009 at 12:39 PM

Yea, and it’s not too early to try and find one. But who?

scalleywag on October 2, 2009 at 12:48 PM

We need a republican for 2012 who is willing to acknowledge that Iraq was a dumb *** idea like Ron Paul.

Spathi on October 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM

Ron Paul is a dumb *** idea?

Yes, I guess he is.

JohnTant on October 2, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Why would anyone think of hiring Schmidt, or for that matter, anyone on McCain’s election staff ever again? At least in politics. They picked Palin and then spent a lot of effort to trash her with leaks and false praise. Losers all.

Sporty1946 on October 2, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Spathi on October 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM

So, Spat, where would you like to be fighting the Muslim’s – here?

Sporty1946 on October 2, 2009 at 12:50 PM

We need a republican for 2012 who is willing to acknowledge that Iraq was a dumb *** idea like Ron Paul.

Spathi on October 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM

Where were you in the Ron Paul thread?

the_nile on October 2, 2009 at 12:54 PM

What will be the reaction by the Palin haters if this book is NOT about the presidential campaign?

It would make equal sense for Palin to write her first book about her life in Alaska. So far, we have only seen her in Alaska through the slanted eyes of the media. A good book could be had regarding the things she has done in Alaska.

Freddy on October 2, 2009 at 12:55 PM

Spathi on October 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM

LOL…Man that is a good one.

Where are you performing this weekend? Anywhere in the midwest? I gotta catch your stage show.

PappaMac on October 2, 2009 at 12:55 PM

The only thing we all need to remember is the person the media bashes most is the one the Democrats fear most. Palin 2012.

royzer on October 2, 2009 at 12:56 PM

How cute.

McCain campaign guys think the world cares about their opinion on how to win elections.

…..

The One has some competition for contemptible hubris, it would seem.

Hawkins1701 on October 2, 2009 at 12:58 PM

Let America go down in flames because you’d prefer to pout in your corner. Sheesh.

JetBoy on October 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Where have you been the last 9 months to not notice that America IS going down in flames!!

docdave on October 2, 2009 at 12:59 PM

I promise you I will not support any canadate who has Mark Mckinnon or Steve what’s his name as part of his team, and if any canadate pulls out warren Rudmann or Gramm as some kind of reference, I’m done with them.
I want red meat no prisoners no dear friend this or that, no NBC appearance type of canadate.

kangjie on October 2, 2009 at 1:00 PM

It’s unclear to me whether Palin is even considering a run. I don’t think she could win even as bad as things are going for the dems, though. I think we need someone totally new, with no baggage or drama.

scalleywag on October 2, 2009 at 1:01 PM

Steve Schmidt: Nominating Palin would be “catastrophic” for the GOP

And nominating your boy McCain WASN’T?

LegendHasIt on October 2, 2009 at 1:05 PM

Schmidt is the highest ranking former member of McCain’s inner circle

I think that I see the problem. Maybe Steve thinks that we should renominate McCain. He’d be an even better candidate this time around.

Look, Palin has some issues. I say that as one of her biggest fans. Those problems are correctable, however. And I have a small nit to pick with one of AP’s comments:

…she’ll have to be able to talk about it more fluently to scrub the media image of her as an ignoramus.

Allah, she could cure cancer, balance the federal budget and walk on water on the campaign trail and all we would hear is that she messed with people’s healthcare, cooked the books and pretended to be God. In short, there is nothing-NOTHING- at all she can do to get anything resembling a decent treatment from the media. The only person(s) who will are those destined to lose, like McCain. I’ll throw Pawlenty into that group because despite being a decent conservative, he’s got the impact of dust falling on a down comforter (line stolen from Moxie).

Physics Geek on October 2, 2009 at 1:05 PM

Those folks have to live here too. Save America first, then worry about whether the Hispanics and independents are following your lead. Idiots.

what about “Hsispanics” who are American citizens too? or does that fact not compute for those like you blinded by their ethnic goggles.

Idiot.

Grow Fins on October 2, 2009 at 1:07 PM

Misreading the American conservative at large again.

The “GOP” has lost power because it is tone deaf to the normal every day American conservative who keeps telling them to quit spending and trying to buy votes from people who would rather have the old message. Dhimmicrats and Republicans both believe the only way to win elections is to buy enough swing votes to win. Both tend to neglect their base once the primaries are over in a chase to win the Hispanic votes and the independents. This is stupid.

The vast majority of Americans want their country run the way their households should be run. Save our money. Educate our kids. Defend our citizenry from harm. And stop giving stuff away to people who don’t deserve it or work for it in judgments, verdicts, and welfare.

The rise of Beck, Hannity, O’Reilly, Limbaugh has coincided with the disenfranchisement of exactly the people the Republican party used to represent, but whom they left behind in search of ever more stupid ways to buy Hispanic and independent votes. Those folks have to live here too. Save America first, then worry about whether the Hispanics and independents are following your lead. Idiots.

This is all about strategy to win a certain election. Instead, build a winning movement, with a common sense message (like conservative fiscal sense with a conservative, but laissez faire attitude towards social issues) and voters will flock to your flag. Stand for something and stick with it. Jackasses.

Mr. Schmidt is an idiot.

Subsunk

Subsunk on October 2, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Quote of the day and 1000 internets to you sir!

liquidflorian on October 2, 2009 at 1:07 PM

HA HA, 0bamas and Oprah got DISSED!!!
HA HA

LegendHasIt on October 2, 2009 at 1:08 PM

It’s unclear to me whether Palin is even considering a run. I don’t think she could win even as bad as things are going for the dems, though. I think we need someone totally new, with no baggage or drama.

scalleywag on October 2, 2009

Good luck finding one. No matter who is chosen, the Obama-fellating media will trash them and create baggage and drama even if there is none. It’s what they do.
Until she says no, I’m with Palin. You go find your perfect candidate. Go ahead…we’ll wait.

SKYFOX on October 2, 2009 at 1:08 PM

Dope, (me)
Wrong thread, sorry.

LegendHasIt on October 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM

I just listened to/watched the video. First, this guy just doesn’t get it. Saying she hasn’t “expanded her appeal” to the “middle of the electorate” therefore she can’t be elected is the same sort of bovine residue folks like him were saying about Reagan from 1964 through his second election in 1984. People (not including libs) are starving for leadership from someone, be it Palin or someone else, who has traditional, conservative, common sense American principles and stands by them. Second, I’ve visited Alaska twice and, assuming he was the source of this snarky criticism of Palin, there ain’t no “divas” up there. Any idiot knows you’ll find them in LA and NY.

ncborn on October 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM

Why would anyone think of hiring Schmidt, or for that matter, anyone on McCain’s election staff ever again? At least in politics. They picked Palin and then spent a lot of effort to trash her with leaks and false praise. Losers all.

Sporty1946 on October 2, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Seriously, Schmidt made it his job to submarine their VP candidate at every turn and this shinny-headed douche has the hubris to lecture us about how to win elections…

liquidflorian on October 2, 2009 at 1:12 PM

Steve Schmidt: Nominating Palin would be IS “catastrophic” for the GOP

Suck it Rino!

Branch Rickey on October 2, 2009 at 1:13 PM

Schmidt is the highest ranking former member of McCain’s inner circle to openly criticize Palin, and as such, bears full blame for McCain’s disastrous campaign.

OK, now I feel better.

CarolynM on October 2, 2009 at 1:13 PM

I hope that Sarah is “catastrophic” to the GOP and the dummycrats. Drain the swamp of all the leeches and start over already.

Mangy Scot on October 2, 2009 at 1:15 PM

We need a republican for 2012 who is willing to acknowledge that Iraq was a dumb *** idea like Ron Paul.

Spathi on October 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM

I kept the link to the Paul interview on Iran last night for anarchists like you. But you can get it on the front page now. Paul is a libertarian economically, but his foreign policy is nutball. We’d be toast if he ever came to real power.

And Schmidt is responsible for one of the worst campaigns in history. As one commenter put it a few months ago, if it weren’t for Sarah Palin there would be a McCain-shaped crater somewhere in Arizona. Schmidt and Wallace couldn’t man up and accept blame for the terrible campaign so they anonymously slandered Palin trying to blame her. And he’s still DOING it! Why do we listen to him? Ha! This is so going to backfire on them.

Christian Conservative on October 2, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Stevie did such a great job LOSING.

Subsunk on October 2, 2009 at 12:04 PM

You are correct, sir. The GOP hasn’t offered a decent candidate since Reagan, IMHO. They’re all country club RINOs.

dogsoldier on October 2, 2009 at 1:21 PM

I remember Hugh Hewitt only allowing women callers for 3 weeks discussing Sarah Palin and it was almost universally positive.

ttime500 on October 2, 2009 at 1:23 PM

She and McCain are still claiming Iraq invasion was a good idea.

No it wasn’t.

We need a republican for 2012 who is willing to acknowledge that Iraq was a dumb *** idea like Ron Paul.

Spathi on October 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM

For the first time ever, I agree with you, though I think Ron Paul is nuttier than a fruitcake. Republicans will not win back the White House until we pretty much completely and credibly repudiate most of what George Bush did.

But watch out, Sarah Palin may just do that.

rockmom on October 2, 2009 at 1:24 PM

I guess I should thank this dolt Schmidt for the timely reminder of the GOP, as presently constituted, is dead in the water. The Whigs who have employed Schmidt in the past and are using him now to do their knifework are petrified of Palin and of us. They should be scared. They are out of power and their hold on their own party is now in doubt.

Anyone who employs Schmidt and his pathetic crew from McCain 08 gets no dough and no vote from me.

james23 on October 2, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Schmidt should put that lightbulb back in his mouth. (Addams Family reference).

crosspatch on October 2, 2009 at 1:26 PM

She has huge problems with women.

The problems she has can be overcome IMO. Put her on Oprah, put her on The View, and let her just talk. I personally loved her pro-life speech in Indiana, and I’m not aligned with her on that issue. A lot of women disliked her because of her views on abortion and the fear that she would turn those views into law. I firmly believe she would never do that, and I think more will agree as they hear her directly.

Further, she really does connect at a visceral level to the struggle of a working mom. Plus, she doesn’t need all women to win, she just needs suburban women, and she can get them.

alwaysfiredup on October 2, 2009 at 1:29 PM

btw, Allahpundit, take a vacation. You’re just mailing em in on Palin at this point. You’ve re-written the same tired crap over and over–to no effect–since she was nominated in 08.

james23 on October 2, 2009 at 1:29 PM

I have no inside information but here is my take on Steve Schmidt’s role in the campaign vs. Sarah Palin.

Steve Schmidt was McCain’s campaign manager and had great sway over any decision that McCain would make during the campaign. In addition Schmidt is clearly not an ideological conservative. Everything that has happened since must be seen through these lens.

The most crucial decision that any presidential candidate makes is his choice of a running mate. Realistically the expression “do no harm” has dominated any decision making process. In simplistic terms, do everything in your power to prevent an Eagleton situation from occurring.

As the vetting of potential VP candidates was occurring over the spring and summer in 2008 simultaneously political events and circumstances occurred with regards to the McCain campaign that would influence who the choice would be.

One ongoing or nagging problem for the McCain campaign was its problem with generating any enthusiasm in the “base” for McCain’s candidacy. This is where McCain’s political past (amnesty, McCain-Feingold, the gang of 14) came back to haunt him. I honestly think Schmidt knew this was a problem but McCain I think felt that the “base” would eventually “come around” (where else were they going to go).

Thus his initial choice of Lieberman. What arrogance and hubris when you think about it, to think as a Republican nominee for POTUS that you can win the Presidency without the support of the “base” and then to boot McCain thinks he can thumb his nose at the evangelical and conservative groups in the party and somehow breeze through the convention and get their unqualified support for the Lieberman pick and his candidacy.

It was reported about one week to 10 days before the GOP convention that the word finally was sent to McCain that Lieberman was definitely not acceptable and furthermore conservative groups might walk out of the convention and not endorse the ticket. If this is indeed true why did it take so long for McCain to figure this out and plan for this eventuality. Was this an example of McCain’s ego and classic stubborness overriding common sense? Was this an example of his political naivete and a glaring weakness in his political acumen and could we also assume this also was a weakness in Schmidt’s assessment of the situation and his unability to convince his boss to abandon thinking of choosing Lieberman.

It is my belief on getting the word from the “base” that Lieberman was unacceptable that the McCain campaign was thrown into a loop; and then when Obama chose Biden it further threw the McCain campaign into a semi-panic. Of course the campaign had contingency plans if the Lieberman option did not pan out but how serious were these contingency plans treated by McCain and Schmidt? I would suggest before Biden was chosen, not very high.

Then McCain and Schmidt realized what the political lay of the land was with one week left to go. I can see McCain, Schmidt and all his top advisors sitting around a conference table for hours going over all the other potential VP candidates discussing the pros and cons of each candidate, with the elephant in the room being the potentially disaffected Hillary supporters.

I really believe McCain wanted to choose somebody like Ridge or Pawlenty but this may be one of the times where Schmidt was right and told McCain there was no way in hell he had a chance to win with these fellows in this political climate of the “first black president” and “hope and change”; and even if he chose Romney it would not close the enthusiasm gap among conservatives in his campaign which ahd lingered for the last 6 months. And that had also translated in lower than expected fundraising.

I think on the weekend before Palin was chosen or maybe on the following Monday McCain finally stepped up to the plate and embraced the reality that he had feared: he would have to suck up to a part of the party that he literally had disdain for-the social conservatives and evangelicals. And for McCain to do that was an admission that his arrogant strategy of not bringing conservatives to his tent in the spring and summer had not worked; it had been instead misguided and a colossal mistake in his campaign.

So with that in mind, the charisma of the Messiah and the Hillary factor Schmidt and McCain decided they had to think outside the box, and I believe this was the first time they gave serious consideration to choosing Sarah.

I can see McCain saying I need a conservative who will placate the base, galvanize volunteers to GOTV and increase my fundraising but who will not overshadow my message, because we don’t want to resurrect Reagan conservatism, do we? After checking with Culvahouse who had vetted Palin who told McCain she was “high risk, high reward” McCain talked it over with Schmidt to weigh the pros and cons of choosing Palin. I really think they thought they could “handle her” and make her conform to McCain’s message and toe the line and advertise her as a socon to appeal to the base but still maintain the integrity of the McCain “moderate” message. I honestly think they thought that Sarah being unknown would not attract much attention and also believe they completely missed her “charisma” quotient to potentially overwhelm McCain himself. How they missed that, I really don’t know.

Now to the $64 dollar question. How did Schmidt feel about choosing Sarah Palin as McCain’s VP? I think he considered it like Letterman yesterday confessing to affairs with staffers rather than having to pay over $2m. Schmidt I think he realized if Palin was not chosen McCain had the potential of losing by 15 points and lose in a landslide and that would damage his own career as a political advisor in the future. Thus he reconciled himself to what had to be done but I don’t believe he truly embraced it totally.

And then when Schmidt admitted on Sept 16 that McCain could not win because of the financial meltdown I believe the campaign went downhill from there and on witnessing this Sarah decided to “go rogue” and basically saved the McCain-Palin ticket from being wiped out.

Actually Schmidt should be grateful that Sarah propped the McCain campaign up, but over the last 6 months he has fallen back to his “moderate” roots and attacked Palin over her conservative ideals which he chose to overlook when he agreed with McCain or recommended that she had to be chosen.

That is entirely hypocritical on his part.

technopeasant on October 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM

I don’t think Palin is running in 2012 although I would like to see it.

kangjie on October 2, 2009 at 1:35 PM

Go Sarah Palin!

I’m tired of rinos.

tinkerthinker on October 2, 2009 at 1:37 PM

Why is AP publishing so early in the AM? I need my substantial analysis from Ed before my fluffy Behar/Letterman/Palin-bashing stuff. Oh well, there’s always Powerline for the day….

And just to head you off, AP… “terrific“

jwehman on October 2, 2009 at 11:15 AM

Still up from the night before, so he could stay on top of the Olympics story?

Oh, the sacrifices he makes for us, and how little we appreciate it…..

tom on October 2, 2009 at 1:39 PM

Right now, everybody is making projections of Palin’s appeal in three years based on the past year. If the election were held today, those would be valid assessments. A lot can change in three years. Palin is just starting her foray into national politics. She is going to grow as a candidate. The Sarah of 2012 will not be the Sarah of 2008 in terms of experience and being beholden to another candidate.

I think all these critics should cool their jets for a few years and see how Palin matures as a national figure, then they can make their assessments.

Mallard T. Drake on October 2, 2009 at 1:42 PM

No wonder McCain lost!

d1carter on October 2, 2009 at 12:17 PM

True that.

Actually Schmidt should be grateful that Sarah propped the McCain campaign up, but over the last 6 months he has fallen back to his “moderate” roots and attacked Palin over her conservative ideals which he chose to overlook when he agreed with McCain or recommended that she had to be chosen.

That is entirely hypocritical on his part.

technopeasant on October 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM

This only strengthens the argument that Glenn Made about McCain.

Chaz706 on October 2, 2009 at 1:44 PM

This story is about the spiral down of a career. He clearly was the “anonymous” source, blew the handling of Palin, ran a horrible campaign, and is still so immature that he’s making it about her.

Nothing is worse than a manager with not a shred of personal ethics.

What a complete loser.

AnninCA on October 2, 2009 at 1:44 PM

Steve who?

Basilsbest on October 2, 2009 at 1:45 PM

Schmidt is probably trying to line up a job with Pawlenty or another RINO.

He knows that Sarah is his competition, not Obama.

He is a Frumite.

In 2012, if the GOP picks a moderate like McCain, the libertarians and conservatives will show up in significantly less numbers and Obama will easily win.

Sapwolf on October 2, 2009 at 1:48 PM

(Schmidt) Men who are afraid of women and disparage them, next on Oprah. Time to drop the dead weight Republicans and Schmidt doesn’t have a book that’s number #1 before it’s been released. He doesn’t want to be irrelevant but it’s too late. Nobody cares what happens to Steve Schmidt’s career but Steve Schmidt….Now Sarah Palin people are following her with intense interest.

Dr Evil on October 2, 2009 at 1:49 PM

kangje on October 2, 2009 at 1:35 PM

I DON’T THINK PALIN IS RUNNING IN 2012 ALTHOUGH I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT

Have you not read the tea leaves since January 2009:

1)establishing SarahPAC in late January

2)her speech in the spring to the Alaskan GOP attacking Obama and accusing him of enslaving the nation

3)her reception in June in NY State and her continued attacks on Obama

4)her resignation in July

5)her decision to go into the “wilderness” like Ronald Reagan

6)”death panels” and her attacks on cap and trade

7)her speech in HK which essentially could be what she could run on and to enhance her foreign affairs credentials

8)her book being moved up till Nov 17th from spring 2010

9)and today word that Todd Palin has resigned from his north slope job

What more evidence do you need that she is running? of course she is going to deny it, like all the candidates do, but right now she is proceeding to get all her ducks in a row and building a campaign infrastructure.

Sarah is definitely running in 2012.

technopeasant on October 2, 2009 at 1:49 PM

AnninCA on October 2, 2009 at 1:44 PM

Thank you Ann. I think we know who it was and we can probably throw in Wallace too due to the ambush setup of allowing interview edits and going SIX hours on the interview with Couric. That long of an interview is practically an interrogation.

This guy is pointing fingers around rather than taking the blame for a very poor campaign. He clearly does not get it.

Sapwolf on October 2, 2009 at 1:50 PM

There should be a list of RINOS a score card.

Dr Evil on October 2, 2009 at 1:50 PM

technopeasant on October 2, 2009 at 1:49 PM

I agree. She’s running.

Which foolish GOP politician will get in her way and get run over?

Sapwolf on October 2, 2009 at 1:52 PM

Schmidt is probably trying to line up a job with Pawlenty or another RINO.

Well, LOL* I’m sorry, but the idiot who would hire him after his behavior with leaking stories, etc., truly has no business running a cash register, nevermind the country.

There are clear ethical guidelines that were violated. He has put McCain in a terrible spot, too.

He really should just go become a consultant to some country in Africa, or do whatever those guys do after they blow their political credentials.

AnninCA on October 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM

Liz Cheney/Sarah Palin 2012 (either order)

Knott Buyinit on October 2, 2009 at 1:57 PM

You know, when you compare Schmidt to a master like Axelrod, you only then really understand WHY Obama won.

Axelrod’s Rommel to Schmidt’s Gen. Clark (WW2)

Sapwolf on October 2, 2009 at 2:00 PM

Ahhhhh… Palin smeared by an inside the Beltway RINO looser… a guy who is part of the GOP Oligarchy…

And this guy thinks it will HURT her? Heck… it HELPS!

Romeo13 on October 2, 2009 at 2:02 PM

Liz Cheney/Sarah Palin 2012 (either order)

Knott Buyinit on October 2, 2009 at 1:57 PM

Yep. However, the media would go after Liz because she has not had public office experience.

At least we know now how important it is to have a good campaign manager who has the VISION thing down and understands the mood and politics of the country. Schmidt doesn’t have a handle on it.

I’ll bet he has yet to go to a Tea Party to understand what it is all about. Even if you are not one of them, you go anyway because you are a professional and need to have a feel for the grassroots.

Schmidt lacks vision and is probably lazy and he is definitely elitist.

Sapwolf on October 2, 2009 at 2:03 PM

AnninCA on October 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM

I hope your right Ann, but in my life I have seen idiots hire idiots before.

This guy is a cancer for the libertarians and conservatives.

Sapwolf on October 2, 2009 at 2:05 PM

I hope your right Ann, but in my life I have seen idiots hire idiots before.

This guy is a cancer for the libertarians and conservatives.

Sapwolf on October 2, 2009 at 2:05 PM

Well, then they’ll be burned, too. You either have a code or you don’t. He obviously doesn’t.

Beyond that, if they hire him, they are incompetent themselves.

Some of the memes that got started with her came directly from the campaign pen.

Pushing the Alaska/Russia connection……right from the manager
Not addressing the clothes issue immediately……his call
Ayers/Obama connection…….I bet we’ll read that she was told to hit that hard. Sarah was a team player. That’s the role of the VP to hit on topics the candidate should avoid.
The interviews and poor reading of how Couric and Gibson would use her to make themselves look like tough interviewers. (Remember, they were under heat about giving Obama a soft ride.) That’s just basic stuff.

But the worst was that she was a prima donna. Oh please, she asked for a diet coke? No back-up. No proof. Nothing but sheer malignant gossip without foundation.

He’ll repeat this. This stuff screamed of a lack of professionalism.

AnninCA on October 2, 2009 at 2:11 PM

I’m ready to see more of Palin! She doesn’t need to turn into a media hawg, but she could stick her head up every now and then. She hasn’t even done a good Facebook note in a while and there has been plenty of subject matter out there lately.

joedoe on October 2, 2009 at 2:14 PM

I’m feeling optimistic

Kini on October 2, 2009 at 2:18 PM

Waiting to hear McCain come out and defend his vice presidential candidate…..

Crickets.

HornetSting on October 2, 2009 at 2:20 PM

And then when Schmidt admitted on Sept 16 that McCain could not win because of the financial meltdown I believe the campaign went downhill from there and on witnessing this Sarah decided to “go rogue” and basically saved the McCain-Palin ticket from being wiped out.

Actually Schmidt should be grateful that Sarah propped the McCain campaign up, but over the last 6 months he has fallen back to his “moderate” roots and attacked Palin over her conservative ideals which he chose to overlook when he agreed with McCain or recommended that she had to be chosen.

That is entirely hypocritical on his part.

technopeasant on October 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM

Techno,

You are correct about how Schmidt and McCain GAVE UP after the economic meltdown in the mortgage/housing industry.

At that point, the election was lost barring a meteor landing on the Messiah’s head.

Schmidt then went into damage control to protect himself and to minimize their blame and try to put it on Sarah because she was perceived to be the conservative.

Schmidt used the rest of the time to attack Palin to protect his reputation.

It was CLASSIC rats scrambling off a sinking ship while the fighter Sarah was the LAST ONE ON THE SHIP.

Sarah fought til the end, and McCain/Schmidt gave up in mid-Sept. Schmidt/Wallace then tried to blame Sarah because they don’t want the base to control the party.

Sapwolf on October 2, 2009 at 2:22 PM

Sorry AP but did you not actually read the excerpt of her HK speech she posted on Facebook – it was quite a perceptive look at the Geopolitics of Asia. Watch out particularly for what she says about Islam – much more Michael Yon than Jihad Watch. Also she was fairly even handed about China…indeed the speech was so good the HuffPo posters followed the meme “she didnt write it herself..just performed it”
I think that over the next few months she will rebuild her image into the pre RNC Governor who was tough, took no prisoners but was not partisan. Dont forget that this is the umpteenth time you have written this article yet she is still around without forcing herself into the public eye…

callingallcomets on October 2, 2009 at 2:27 PM

I don’t like Schmidt or Palin.

davenp35 on October 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM

And we are supposed to care about that? Move on punk…

lovingmyUSA on October 2, 2009 at 2:28 PM

what about “Hsispanics” who are American citizens too? or does that fact not compute for those like you blinded by their ethnic goggles.

Idiot.

Grow Fins on October 2, 2009 at 1:07 PM

That is not what he is saying Growfins.

He is basically saying just build the libertarian/conservative movement and stand for the American values that ALL Americans can aspire to.

You want to attract Hispanics? Here’s how.

Emphasize FAMILY.
Emphasize SMALL BUSINESS

That is a start.

Hispancs hate overregulation of their businesses as non-hispanics do.

The problem is that the GOP refuses to construct the VISION. That VISION works basically for ALL Americans.

If Sarah Palin learns some Spanish and takes her vision to Hispanics, she will get many votes. She is very likable and personable and has the retail skills to make a dent in that vote.

Sapwolf on October 2, 2009 at 2:34 PM

However, I think she is being a lazy *** and not putting in the work….

Who knows? Maybe she is in it for the money only.

TimeTraveler on October 2, 2009 at 11:52 AM

Save the BS for someone else, did you bother to pay attention to what Sarah said in Hong Kong regarding the future of China or the war against terrorism? Do you think that her views are the product of laziness of research?

heshtesh on October 2, 2009 at 2:35 PM

Someone wants to take election advice from this guy?

Here he is trying to take her out before the campaigning begins. If she is so bad, and so limited she cannot win nomination.

The leadership of the party cannot be outsourced to the conservative-entertainment complex

True. It cannot because it is a free country and the elites of the party can start their own conservative-entertainment complex to compete with the false conservatives everyone is listening to.

Which makes me ponder what he means by leadership

entagor on October 2, 2009 at 2:39 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4