Video: Ron Paul spins for Iran, of course
posted at 8:31 pm on October 1, 2009 by Allahpundit
A follow-up to my post last weekend about what a disgraceful, denialist crank this guy is. Let me go in chronological order, as there’s so much here that’s either dumb or dishonest that I’ll overlook something if I don’t.
1. Who are the mysterious “neocons” who forced poor Barack Obama to disclose the secret Qom site, which Paul would have you believe he didn’t want to do even though he’s been preparing to do it for months? Or have I misunderstood and he’s actually suggesting that Obama’s been duped and that there’s no secret Qom site at all, even though other western intel services have been keeping tabs on it for years? Give us the names of this nefarious Jewish — sorry, I mean “neocon” — cabal, please.
2. According to The Only Man Who Can Save America, Iran actually disclosed the existence of the Qom site to the IAEA before Obama disclosed it, ergo it’s not actually a secret. True. What he doesn’t mention: They only disclosed it a week ago, in the vaguest possible terms, after having kept it a secret for at least three years, and only because they realized that the west knew about it and was about to blow their cover. Nuance, Ron Paul style.
3. An excellent point: He notes that U.S. intel apparently knew about the secret Qom site even before the infamous 2007 NIE declaring that Iran had halted its weapons program was released. Not so excellent: The conclusion he draws from this, apparently, is that the Qom site is nothing to worry about rather than the much more likely conclusion that evidence of Iranian weaponization was withheld from the NIE in a politicized bid to deny Bush any reason to take military action against Iran. Oh, also? No mention here that classified portions of that very same NIE declared that Iran had an estimated 10 to 15 secret nuclear sites. How come, Doctor?
4. “What does the law say?” wonders our hero, declaring Iran innocent of any international violations. In fact, IAEA chief Mohammed ElBaradei acknowledged just this morning that Iran had broken the law. (In Paul’s semi-defense, this clip was recorded three days ago.)
5. He asserts that the IAEA has never found Iran’s nuclear program to be at fault, which (a) overlooks point 4 above and (b) ignores the fact that the IAEA has been credibly accused by western intel agencies — and not just America’s — of suppressing evidence that incriminates Iran in order to avoid military conflict. In fact, ElBaradei himself is an Iranian stooge of such longstanding that we’ve been writing about it since practically day one of Hot Air. The fact that even he’s been forced to get tough-ish is all the proof you need that Tehran’s in flagrant violation of its international commitments.
I’ll probably find five more out-and-out lies if I watch the clip again but that’s all for now.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 Next »
Is it Crazy Douchebag Awareness Day?
Monica on October 1, 2009 at 8:34 PM
As they say in downtown Tehran, Oy, you just nuked Dr. Paul, AP.
Might as well close this thread; no additional comments needed.
SteveMG on October 1, 2009 at 8:34 PM
I live in his district, but we can’t seem to ‘primary’ him. Sigh.
Countrysquire on October 1, 2009 at 8:35 PM
Well…maybe this will finally run the paul-nuts off…nah, that would be too good.
AUINSC on October 1, 2009 at 8:35 PM
Paulbots invade the thread in 5..4…3…
on the bright side, maybe we’ll finally get to find out who those Traitorous Foreigners are that own the media and subvert it to their evil neocon will.
TheQuestion on October 1, 2009 at 8:36 PM
Really, this is about as devastating a destruction of someone by AP that I’ve read in a long time.
Sure, Paul’s a low hanging fruit but still….
SteveMG on October 1, 2009 at 8:38 PM
On domestic issues like auditing the Fed and such I generally like the guy but on foreign policy the guy is a complete and total loss.
He’s not on any foreign relations committee’s is he?
Yakko77 on October 1, 2009 at 8:38 PM
Ron Paul wants Iran to radiate Israel, it is as simple as that.
Daemonocracy on October 1, 2009 at 8:39 PM
Oh my, AP puts up a post about Ron Paul which must make him a Paulian if one is to use Charles Johnson’s method of guilt by association.
Knucklehead on October 1, 2009 at 8:39 PM
Is Ron Paul really Charles Johnson’s daddy?
Maybe the Rooskies did poison our water years ago with that “fluoride” stuff like the Birchers claimed. It was a long-term project, and we’re finally seeing the amount of brain damage it caused.
MrScribbler on October 1, 2009 at 8:40 PM
Can this idiot go away already?
WisCon on October 1, 2009 at 8:41 PM
MSNBC’s favorite republican (after pat buchanan, of course)…
homesickamerican on October 1, 2009 at 8:42 PM
Ever notice that Paul has more trust in every other government than the United States’ government?
For some reason, our government always lies, is always duplicitous and is always in the wrong.
Meanwhile, foreign governments hostileto us must be trusted and believed because they are only our enemies because Washington makes them so.
No wonder those twenty-something dopeheads like him.
SteveMG on October 1, 2009 at 8:42 PM
If Obamacare goes through, Paul and any of his friends and/or relatives should be triaged if they (God forbid) fall victim to a terrorist attack especially by an Iranian nuke. Even if they have chance to survive, they should be left to die–like babies who survive abortion are left in pails in closets.
Turnabout is fair play, and libs love fair play!
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 8:42 PM
Instead of that nonsense, it is beyond me why the big pages are ignoring the amazing talent coming out of JoeDanMedia. Conservative Rock & Roll Provocateurs… a guitar in one hand slapping the left with the other hand. This stuff is featured on the MarkLevinFan site. And we need to push this guy… He loves his country, and he rocks. Come on Allah, Ed…you need to feature this!
deedtrader on October 1, 2009 at 8:42 PM
Supporting autocratic governments = not a libertarian.
exception on October 1, 2009 at 8:42 PM
Bildebergers!
SouthernGent on October 1, 2009 at 8:42 PM
How do people become robots taht follow this nutcase?
daesleeper on October 1, 2009 at 8:45 PM
Part of me wouldn’t mind if the whole ****ing lot of them nuked themselves into extinction so we could say goodbye to the whole debacle!
Mr. Paul, I understand where you’re coming from – there has been PLENTY of Chicken-Little nonsense in the media over the past couple decades – but this is a real threat. NK and Iran are developing nukes and they will find an excuse to use them sooner or later.
Dark-Star on October 1, 2009 at 8:46 PM
Well, many conservatives keep saying to vote for the lesser of two evils at election time. (and not just for president) So simply apply that a little further to voting for the least of two evils and one semi-clueless.
Dark-Star on October 1, 2009 at 8:49 PM
This tin-foil hat kook of an anti-Semite is a one man answer to the question posed by Norman Podhoretz’s recent book.
Knott Buyinit on October 1, 2009 at 8:49 PM
So its not the Iranians,but the evil right,that controls
the Iranians!!
Me thinks in a Liberal worldview that makes some sense,
but in the mind of a Righty,do you really believe what
you just said,no seriously that just whacked!
canopfor on October 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM
Brown acid.
AUINSC on October 1, 2009 at 8:51 PM
I don,t know who,s hates Israel more Paul or Msnbc,s Buchanan?
thmcbb on October 1, 2009 at 8:52 PM
Seems to me that’s enough to send all the Paulnuts to the corner. I’m saving this link to be used every time someone shouts out “Ron Paul for President.” His foreign policy is whacko.
Christian Conservative on October 1, 2009 at 8:54 PM
<—was told being a Palinista is being a tin foil hat kook.
Mine will include an antenna made from a coat hanger.
Jeff from WI on October 1, 2009 at 8:54 PM
Ron Paul would be brilliant if he wasn’t so stupid.
JellyToast on October 1, 2009 at 8:55 PM
You forgot Jimmy the peanut farmer.
Knucklehead on October 1, 2009 at 8:56 PM
Ron Paul. “That’s kooky!”
He’ll always be on the side of whoever wants to wipe Israel off the map. Two decades of tirades against Israel and Jews, nothing but support for the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism. He’s not even trying to pretend he didn’t write those newsletters anymore.
BruthaMan on October 1, 2009 at 8:57 PM
Thank the Lord Jesus Christ that there is at least one good man in congress who actually is loyal to THIS country and is looking to restore this country to it’s former glory and protect and defend our citizens: Ron Paul!
All of you phony conservatives who oppose Ron Paul and American freedom and sovereignty should just give up your act. You’re not fooling anyone anymore.
MaximusConfessor on October 1, 2009 at 8:58 PM
Really, any respect I ever had for him is in the gutter.
Diane on October 1, 2009 at 8:59 PM
This guy is batshit insane.
tetriskid on October 1, 2009 at 9:00 PM
Yes he is, unfortunately. See here, below the “media outlets” area on the right.
unclesmrgol on October 1, 2009 at 9:01 PM
Conservatives have to decide which they value more: low taxes, strong borders, diminishing the size of the federal government, or the status quo middle east foreign policy. No one is suggesting we side with the arabs, as the Left suggests. The arabs nations are dirt and should be treated as such. However, what he is suggesting is that we side with no one but ourselves which is the real road to national security. Nation building is a liberal endeavor.
It’s a shame that people who consider themselves conservative are willing to burn a man at the stake who is the vanguard of all the conservative signature issues like low taxes, strong borders, and a dimished federal government simply because he doesn’t tow the neocon party line on foreign policy. Not only is it a shame, it’s a tad odd.
keep the change on October 1, 2009 at 9:02 PM
I would have more trust in Ru Paul on foreign policy.
ICBM on October 1, 2009 at 9:02 PM
Finally, one rises to the bait. Gaff ‘em and bring ‘em in!
unclesmrgol on October 1, 2009 at 9:02 PM
Nice act. Or not. Either way, I still laughed.
Bishop on October 1, 2009 at 9:03 PM
That’s two. Forget the gaff, we need the net.
unclesmrgol on October 1, 2009 at 9:03 PM
Does it look like he is sitting in front of a green screen?
wowrob on October 1, 2009 at 9:04 PM
I don’t know. I find it difficult to support one’s ‘conservatism’ (so called) while being anti free trade. It doesn’t make sense.
anuts on October 1, 2009 at 9:04 PM
There’s always one….
See, the Iranians and the Islamists (not the same thing of course) only threaten us because we support Israel or something.
It has nothing to do with their own ideology, their own interests as they see them, their own desire to dominate their world.
Nope, it’s us.
SteveMG on October 1, 2009 at 9:05 PM
It really is a slow news day…
d1carter on October 1, 2009 at 9:05 PM
The only people who are insane are the ones who actually think that bombing and invading iran would actually stop SUNNI wahabist terrorism whatsoever.
MaximusConfessor on October 1, 2009 at 9:05 PM
I consider myself very conservative, does this make me a neocon?
I feel like afrolib is hanging around somewhere.
SHARPTOOTH on October 1, 2009 at 9:08 PM
No one believes that attacking Iran will end the radical Sunni threat since the Persians are Shi’a.
And it’s about at this point where the discussion with a Paul supporter really goes off the rails.
SteveMG on October 1, 2009 at 9:08 PM
Oh please. Let’s not get carried away MaximusHyperbolizer.*
*sorry for the name pun. I try to avoid that play as it’s silly. Couldn’t resist though.
anuts on October 1, 2009 at 9:09 PM
Ooof. You lost already, though apparently are unaware of the fact.
Bishop on October 1, 2009 at 9:10 PM
Dr. Paul, 1939 called and they want you back… for a Mothers Against War March on FDR’s White House.
Those Nazis were just harmless buffoons, remember?
Hitler was an impotent clown.
If we just let little old Adolf alone, he’d have no further territorial demands.
Somebody please forward this to Ron… via carrier pigeon.
Or loin-cloth clad barefoot runner.
profitsbeard on October 1, 2009 at 9:10 PM
MaximusConfessor on October 1, 2009 at 9:05 PM
Nobody want’s to invade Iran, We just wan’t to bomb the hell out of their nuke facilities.
SHARPTOOTH on October 1, 2009 at 9:11 PM
Do any sane, stable humans run for high political office . . . if so, where?
rplat on October 1, 2009 at 9:11 PM
Meanwhile,back at Terrorist Cave Central,
Abby dabby praise you know who,I cannot believe some of these Americans,who needs a PR Team,bewteen Ron Paul
and Obama,I cannot believe our luck,and after our
glorious leader ImWearingADinnerJacketNutJob has stall
ed the Western Powers are plans are almost complete,
praise you know who,… ….(Snark)
canopfor on October 1, 2009 at 9:11 PM
Ron Paul is whatever the kooks and cranks that follow him make up for the day. RP nuts talk about freedom, yet support a man that wouldn’t lift a finger to defend freedom for our country, let alone other countries whose freedom is threatened by “gasp!!!” those that place no value on freedom.
Maybe it’s not everyone else that needs to decide what they support. In a “Ron Paul” world, nothing would ever be dealt with and pretending nothing’s wrong would just make it go away. In the real world, it simply doesn’t work that way.
Ron Paul is a third rate monday morning quarter back who never misses an opportunity to blame America first. You can always count on him to say kind things about terrorists, but never a good word for his own country.
BruthaMan on October 1, 2009 at 9:12 PM
Or loin-cloth clad barefoot runner.
profitsbeard on October 1, 2009 at 9:10 PM
profitsbeard: Maybe smoke-signals from a We Weed Up
party would help as well!hehe:)
canopfor on October 1, 2009 at 9:14 PM
Just out of curiosity, where do you get this idea of “true conservatism”. When was the last time conservatism was aligned with isolationism? Prior to Eisenhower?
jhffmn on October 1, 2009 at 9:14 PM
When is Hot Air going to do a story about the jail in Hardin Montana?
infidelgranny on October 1, 2009 at 9:16 PM
You racist degenerate.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
Evidentally here you are free to be as racist as you want against arabs(many of whom are Christians BTW).
MaximusConfessor on October 1, 2009 at 9:17 PM
The Hippie generation raised our misguided Paul supporters. Shame on them for dropping the ball on parenting.
His supporters are primarily our young Gen X men that haven’t got a clue but they do have careers and money to waste now. So tragic the waste of time, energy, and money that went into Ron Paul’s campaign.
scotash on October 1, 2009 at 9:21 PM
The old joke about Pat Buchanan is that he lost a relative at Auschwitz – one who fell out of a guard tower. Ron Paul is just bats**t nuts.
mcassill on October 1, 2009 at 9:22 PM
It’s never too late to take back a hijacked political philosophy. Conservatism used to be something respectable; a reasonable counterpart to liberalism. No longer. “Conservative” in today’s parlance means Bible-thumping, warmongering lunatic. What used to be the centerpiece features of conservative ideology have now been reduced to tacked-on platitudes; window dressing. The pro-life maniacs, the gun nuts, the people who’ve never seen a war they didn’t like–these are today’s “conservatives.”
mr_B on October 1, 2009 at 9:22 PM
Eat s**t SaintOlaf, you anti-semitic little wretch.
MadisonConservative on October 1, 2009 at 9:22 PM
People that reach for the racist card prematurely should take into consideration whom they are defending, less they be reminded of the numerous Ron Paul newsletters that exposed his hatred for blacks and Jews.
Two decades or rants against Jews and now defending those that want to “wipe” Israel off the map simply reaffirms those old newsletters.
How do you take your hypocrisy? “Black” or “cream and sugar?”
BruthaMan on October 1, 2009 at 9:25 PM
That was your fellow paultard you just called out. Or is it just your sockpuppet?
mcassill on October 1, 2009 at 9:26 PM
Ron Paul is a true American hero for trying to prevent this.
Bombing iran would ONLY make things TEN TIMES WORSE.
It would almost definitely be the final deathblow to America
There is no way we could sustain this or the gigantic blowback that would surely happen because of this.
Starting a huge war with iran does not benefit us AT ALL and ONLY helps the state of israel. It is only in their best interest and not ours.
If they want to do this so bad, let them do it themselves and have their children die and not ours.
MaximusConfessor on October 1, 2009 at 9:26 PM
Hm, I could’ve sworn that was a video of Jimmy Carter.
CP on October 1, 2009 at 9:27 PM
Email Allah or Ed so they can check it out, granny.
Gitmo coming to Montana?
HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 9:28 PM
It doesn’t matter how right Paul is about economics, the guy is a crackpot and an incredibly naive halfwit when it comes to everything else.
Sharke on October 1, 2009 at 9:30 PM
That’s not how it works. It’s our money and technology that funds the Israeli war machine and our soldiers who get killed to further their regional ambitions and shut down their perceived enemies.
It’s time to say enough is enough: Israel is on its own and they had better learn to play nice because we’re not going to be their bodyguard anymore.
mr_B on October 1, 2009 at 9:31 PM
What is it with kooks and antisemitism?
It always boils down to the Zionist war machine and Jew beams with you guys.
jhffmn on October 1, 2009 at 9:32 PM
The neocons are anyone who disagrees with Herr Doktor and his followers. And accusing neocons of making Obama do anything is rich.
These same morons also claim Obama himself is a neocon.
catmman on October 1, 2009 at 9:33 PM
o you are an anti-semite as well as a supporter of pedophiles. Well ain’t you just the multi-taskin’ little devil.
thomasaur on October 1, 2009 at 9:34 PM
This just goes to show that conservatives fully deserve the constant charges of racism that vex them so: because they’re perfectly willing to turn around and do the same exact thing by calling anyone who disagrees with their foreign policy “antisemites.”
Why do you hate black people, jhffmn?
mr_B on October 1, 2009 at 9:36 PM
I’m intrigued at how, in the Ronulan mind, “blowback” only goes one way and it’s always America’s fault.
Say…what about Iran risking “blowback” by antagonizing the rest of the world with its nuclear ambitions and not-so-veiled threats against the West? Gee…far from the US bombing Tehran being an invitation for blowback, I think it’s actually blowback against Iran for being such buttheads…that is, if the concept of “blowback” is intellectually consistent to begin with and not just a handy club for Ronulans to use in bashing the US.
JohnTant on October 1, 2009 at 9:36 PM
Ron Paul wants Iran to radiate Israel, it is as simple as that.
Daemonocracy on October 1, 2009 at 8:39 PM
Bildebergers!
SouthernGent on October 1, 2009 at 8:42 PM
“Bohemian Grove! Illuminati!”
*slobber* – Paulbot
catmman on October 1, 2009 at 9:36 PM
There is something really off about Ron Paul. I really think that his idea of foreign policy is totally loony.
ReneePA on October 1, 2009 at 9:37 PM
I know Ron Paul personally and agree with his domestic/fiscal/border policy views completely.
As to foreign relations/national security, however, he has a disconnect.
The only way we can fully disengage from the various entanglements and imbroglios throughout the globe, any of which can involve our own security, is to have an outright resolve to wipe from the face of the earth those nations/interests and their entire populations, if need be, who would bring harm to us.
It’s the absence of this mindset that has hamstrung us for 60 years, and what hamstrings even a Ron Paul.
You turn your back on evil for but a brief moment, you will feel the cold fire of a knife.
TXUS on October 1, 2009 at 9:37 PM
How many times does Ron Paul have to say something utterly stupid about foreign policy and world affairs for us to accept for good that the guy is crazier than a foot loop and should be disregarded?
Phil Byler on October 1, 2009 at 9:38 PM
Ok then, explain why the US supports Israel without making allusions to a Zionist conspiracy.
jhffmn on October 1, 2009 at 9:39 PM
That’s complete nonsense. Our foreign aid to Israel is less than we send to craphole dictatorships like Egypt and Pakistan.
And they actually help to defend our country. Since the Democrats gelded what passes for US “intelligence” in the ME, we get a ton from Israel.
I trust Bibi to go it alone and do the right thing with regards to Iran, than I do the clown who presently occupies our Oval Office and the lunatic fringe element of Ron Paul. Wish we had an actual leader in this country like him.
Sure, let’s kick the only Democracy in the Middle East to the curb, because they haven’t let the terrorist dogs surrounding them murder them all. Very rude of them.
NoDonkey on October 1, 2009 at 9:39 PM
Thank you Mr B.
What these neo cons don’t understand is that the republican party has always held what these brainwashed and warmongering Neo-cons call the “paleoconservative” position and that the neocon republicans are a new phenomenom who have destroyed ALL of the republican party’s credibility and endangered our country tremendously.
MaximusConfessor on October 1, 2009 at 9:40 PM
Good question. I was just about to ask if there were any RP supporters that were not anti-semites?
Paultards will never miss an opportunity to let you know they hate Israel, and you’ll never hear a bad word from them about terrorists or any entity that wants to kill Jews.
It’s more than a coincidence, it’s a persistent pattern that can be observed in virtually any thread that discusses Ron Paul’s latest “blame America first, defend terrorists first” rants.
BruthaMan on October 1, 2009 at 9:40 PM
How is saying this any different than Ahmadinejad saying that Israel should be wiped off the map? Your ideas of foreign policy are just as hard-headed, belligerent, and nuance-free as Iran’s are.
mr_B on October 1, 2009 at 9:40 PM
Ron Paul is embarrassing when it comes to foreign policy.
SG1_Conservative on October 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM
Why doesn’t it benefit the Great Satan? And your idea of not standing in the way sounds great too.
unclesmrgol on October 1, 2009 at 9:42 PM
Why don’t you and your pal ‘goose step’ on over to Storm Front where you would be more welcome.
thomasaur on October 1, 2009 at 9:42 PM
“ONLY make things TEN TIMES WORSE”
Only TEN TIMES?! I was hoping for ELEVENTY TIMES WORSE!
catmman on October 1, 2009 at 9:42 PM
How, precisely? Can you give specific reasons why bombing Iran would be worse than the consequences of not bombing them, especially since they’re on track to get the bomb and use it against us? Which is worse: America or Israel bombing Iran and taking out their nuclear facilities, or Iranian nukes raining down on Tel Aviv, Eastern Europe, and eventually America?
TheQuestion on October 1, 2009 at 9:43 PM
Let’s see: Iran has funded terrorism that has killed Americans, has called for the destruction of the US, and is building nuclear weaons in defiance of international law.
The US, meanwhile, has spent nearly a decade offering talks with the regime to resolve the disputes. And every time, until recently, we’ve been rebuffed.
But according to the Paul supporters, it’s the US that is the warmongering party in this dispute.
Notice that his supporters here haven’t expressed one single word of criticism of the Iranian regime?
That’s not an accident.
SteveMG on October 1, 2009 at 9:44 PM
It’s not just Paul kooks either it extends to crazies all over, from Rev. Wright to President Zelaya.
It’s sort of creepy.
jhffmn on October 1, 2009 at 9:44 PM
Conspiracies have nothing to do with it. Israel enjoys America’s unconditional support for two key reasons: aggressive lobbying efforts by Israel, and latent beliefs that Jews are “God’s chosen people” and Israel is the “holy land” by many insane evangelical Christians. Fortunately, both of these groups are rapidly losing political influence.
mr_B on October 1, 2009 at 9:44 PM
Who do you think you are fooling?
They are a THEOCRACY. Not a democracy.
Are you really not aware of how they treat the Orthodox Christians and the Roman Catholics over there?
MaximusConfessor on October 1, 2009 at 9:45 PM
Soon, We’re gonna need a bigger boat!
massrighty on October 1, 2009 at 9:45 PM
If the extermination of entire nations is hamstringing Paul, maybe he’s saner than I thought.
And, enquiring minds ask, what happened 60 years ago to turn the United States away from its allegedly avowed resolve to exterminate?
unclesmrgol on October 1, 2009 at 9:45 PM
Is it my imagination, or does every Paulbot have a KEYBOARD that just HAPPENS to have a STICKY SHIFT KEY?
Anyway, after the pounding they took on the last thread (did you know the innocent muslims bombed Bali before the invasion of Iraq to punish Australia for aiding us with not yet invading Iraq?!), my bet is most of them stay in the bunker for this one.
Tomblvd on October 1, 2009 at 9:46 PM
Better than any other middle eastern country.
But, thanks for playing!
massrighty on October 1, 2009 at 9:47 PM
If you really believe that, and I mean you aren’t indulging in your typical hyperbole, then you have exposed your ignorance of not only the underpinnings of the philosophy you claim to champion, but also an alarming lack of knowledge of conservative zoology and the history of conservatism in general. Your reliance on (and ignorance of) the “neocon” label is evidence enough of that.
Ron Paul doesn’t get to redefine conservatism into something that is palatable to his cult, and neither do you.
JohnTant on October 1, 2009 at 9:47 PM
So, where do you stand on Israels’ right to exist?
massrighty on October 1, 2009 at 9:48 PM
Your ideas of foreign policy are just as hard-headed, belligerent, and nuance-free as Iran’s are.
mr_B on October 1, 2009 at 9:40 PM
You say this, yet it’s somehow the other guy’s fault for wanting to bomb the hell out of Iran, but it’s perfectly alright for Dinnerjacket to want to blow the hell out of Israel.
catmman on October 1, 2009 at 9:49 PM
Let’s answer this question with a question: what do you think would happen if we (or Israel) bombed their facilities? Is Iran going to shrug, say “oh well”, and give up their pursuit of the bomb? Obviously not. Here’s what would happen: we get cut off from Iranian and possibly Venezuelan oil and both Israeli and American military interests would be targeted. In a worst-case scenario, we could get dragged into a conflict that could evolve into World War III, once China and Russia get involved.
mr_B on October 1, 2009 at 9:49 PM
That must make you very happy, to have a perception that “Jews” are loosing influence. How do you feel about the Arab lobby?
Watch the pattern folks…RPtards will never miss an opportunity to tell you how much they hate Jews. Not a peep about state sponsors of terrorists.
BruthaMan on October 1, 2009 at 9:49 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 Next »