yogi41 on October 1, 2009 at 9:23 PM

You would take away AP’s reason for living?

However: There were a few notable exceptions, that didn’t have any ironic component AFAICT and sounded like he meant them as crude slurs. One was “FOX News correspondent”, and the other two were “wingnut” and “there will be a warrant for her arrest” (Sarah Palin). “Ungrateful bastards” (GM) was also in this camp and the snoring sound (Jindal, Romney) was right on the line.

By comparison, the early crack about “if the parole board says it’s okay” (Blagojevich) and even “quitter!” (Palin) were delivered differently and sounded more self-implicating than derisive to me.

There’s obviously Sarah Palin (wingnut) from Alaska who’s a former governor (quitter) and you cannot rule out that by 2012 (there will be a warrant for her arrest) that she’ll be the nominee.”

Whaaatt??? Isn’t one of the first rules of comedy that if you have to explain a joke it’s not funny?

Or maybe he’s hinting that if Obama’s vision for America continues on track, conservatives will be arrested as a matter of course for thought crimes against the state.

Remember when Obama was still in his duel-to-the-death with Hillary Clinton in February 2008 and he played to rust belt audiences in Ohio by bashing NAFTA? To reassure the Canadian government that he didn’t mean it the way it sounded, Goolsbee — then an economic advisor to the BHO campaign from the University of Chicago — went to the Canadian consulate to allay any fears.

From Slate.com, March 4, 2008 (a pic of the actual memo included):

For the Canadians, a key point of concern was Obama’s sharp criticism of the North American Free Trade Agreement. [Joseph DeMora, a consulate staff member] wrote [Canadian Ambassador Michael] Wilson that in the Chicago meeting, Goolsbee “candidly acknowledged the protectionist sentiment that has emerged, particularly in the Midwest, during the primary campaign” but reassured [Georges Rioux, consul general for the Canadian government] that Obama’s NAFTA-bashing “should be viewed as more about political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans.”

Obama economic advisor goofs on “wingnut” Sarah Palin

I would think that being mocked by a proven failure like an “Obama economic advisor” would be a huge plus!!

This is kind of like getting a lecture on seamanship from the captain of the Titanic.

We acknowledge and parrot the “TURDNESS” of the LIBERAL GIGS!

Say NO to Hollywood!

Say NO to MSM!

Say NO to Liberal Musicians!

Teach your children the VALUES OF AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM, INDUSTRY AND SEL WORTH!

Might…. so, would it be worth the risk?

You’ll need a copy of it everyday for the next 3 1/2 years.

http://www.geocities.com/WallStreet/8925/alinsky.htm

For the few that don’t know about it. I’ts called Alinskys’ Rules for Radicals.

RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

Like Letterman……these guys will find out….you sow the wind…..you’ll reap the whirlwind!!!

Bravura.

I have had enough, 4 minutes in and I haven’t heard anything funny. Great post Allah. Your incompetence continues unabated.

Here,here.
So AP, when is your job review with the boss?

You have strang tastes, AP, and an obvious dislike of Sarah Palin.

rlwo2008 on October 1, 2009 at 9:16 PM

And relative to the self-congratulation thread going concurrently, there’s another reason I don’t stay with Hot Air continually.

Now that would’ve been funny.