Obama on Iran talks: “A constructive beginning”

posted at 4:17 pm on October 1, 2009 by Allahpundit

The media seems more interested in the two-week deadline he lays down here for UN inspections at the Qom enrichment site (which will be met, I’m sure) but the real news comes at 1:35 when he talks about an agreement in principle to send some of Iran’s low-enriched uranium to another country so that it can be turned into fuel for nuclear power. What’s potentially significant about that? The Daily Beast explains:

President Obama’s statement about a confidence-building measure from Iran this afternoon left out the key detail: In a breakthrough agreement at talks in Geneva, Iran has agreed to send 1,200 kilograms of enriched uranium to Russia for further processing, two diplomats told the Daily Beast, noting this would mean Iran no longer has enough uranium to make a nuclear weapon…

Under the deal reached today, the two diplomats told the Daily Beast, Iran has now however agreed to send this uranium, which is enriched up to 3.5 percent, to be refined in Russia up to 19.75 percent enrichment and then returned to Iran. That enrichment level would enable it to be used at a research reactor in Tehran which could then burn the fuel to make medical isotopes. But it is not high enough for nuclear weapons.

The diplomats said this deal effectively amounts to a freeze of Iran’s nuclear work, and meets the condition for a second phase of talks at which nuclear issues will be discussed, as well as other proposals put forth by both sides.

If you believe that Iran only has 1,500 kg or so of low-enriched uranium on hand and if you believe there are no other secret Iranian enrichment/weaponization sites, then this is important. Remember, uranium isn’t bomb-capable unless it’s highly enriched, i.e. up to a 90 percent level; if Iran’s serious about wanting nuclear power but not a nuclear weapon, then its uranium only has to be enriched to a low level to be converted into fuel. Having Russia or some other third party take over enrichment duties is a way to make sure that the uranium is only processed to that lower threshold, not the higher one (unless, of course, you think Vladimir Putin would lie). If you don’t believe either of those things, though, then this logic goes out the window: Iran could simply feed Russia some low enriched uranium in order to soothe western fears about its nuke program while continuing to weaponize uranium in its secret facilities. Even if Iran’s on the level and is willing to send its entire current uranium stockpile to an outside party for processing, the machinery to weaponize uranium would still remain in place, ready and willing to go whenever Tehran decides to restart the program. In other words, unless Iran is willing to either disclose its remaining secret sites or agree to very intrusive inspections” to determine whether any secret sites exist or not, then at best this is simply buying time. Which isn’t a terrible outcome — it gives Mousavi’s green movement a little space to try to unseat the regime, after all — but it’s kicking the can down the road, not resolving the issue.

More talks are coming, apparently, perhaps at a higher level next time. Exit statistics via the new Fox News poll: 61 percent are willing to use force against Iran if need be and 69 percent think Obama hasn’t been tough enough. Number who say they’re worried about Iran getting nukes: 77 percent, which I guess is a further reminder of why Ron Paul will never be president.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

the Won has lost.

moonbatkiller on October 1, 2009 at 5:17 PM

it feels like dear leader is about to get punk’d

cmsinaz on October 1, 2009 at 5:20 PM

A contructive beginning would be an end to they ayatollahs and their minions.

Mangy Scot on October 1, 2009 at 5:20 PM

Why should I believe anything Obama says? More importantly, why should I trust a deal between Iran and Russia? I’m sure Iran would love to get some legitimacy for their nuclear program, but that doesn’t mean they’re not spinning more uranium in an underground lab.

hawksruleva on October 1, 2009 at 5:20 PM

Yeah, and North Korea signed a piece of paper with Jimmy Carter. Big deal. They’re playing games here.

CP on October 1, 2009 at 5:21 PM

How do Ahmateenywad and the mullahs contain their laughter at Obimbo in public so well?

Fishoutofwater on October 1, 2009 at 5:21 PM

The only thing missing is a piece of paper in an upstreched hand.

Vashta.Nerada on October 1, 2009 at 5:21 PM

If you believe that Iran only has 1,500 kg or so of low-enriched uranium on hand and if you believe there are no other secret Iranian enrichment/weaponization sites, then this is important.

That’s a mighty big IF. Personally, if they’re only interested in nuke power, why the ‘secret’ enrichment facilities?

Obviously they have enough at 3% to spread around so that no one pays too much attention to what else they’re doing.

GarandFan on October 1, 2009 at 5:21 PM

Who is more dangerous to the planet, Iran’s mullahs or Obama? Tough call.

Fletch54 on October 1, 2009 at 5:22 PM

the Won has lost.

moonbatkiller on October 1, 2009 at 5:17 PM

He was never even in the game…

SouperConservative on October 1, 2009 at 5:22 PM

“What is damn fool, Alex?”

Trebek: Correct for $2000

SouthernGent on October 1, 2009 at 5:22 PM

Afghanistan Iraq Iran, here we come!

The Calibur on October 1, 2009 at 5:23 PM

They will talk to him, and laugh at his humor, listen intently as he lectures, nod their head in agreement. Murmur in total consent, whisper their adoration, with knowing smiles on their faces. They will share their food, and stories of leadership, and they will bond…and Obama will know he is someone special, because they show him honor, and truly will honor him in public. They will toast his bravery, and applaud his speeches…and he will have won their hearts.
*
Then they will ram a bomb up his a$$ and laugh at his naivete…

right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 5:23 PM

but it’s simply kicking the can down the road, not resolving the issue.

We are going to need a long road for this process.

WashJeff on October 1, 2009 at 5:23 PM

“It was very constru–” BOOM!

Rational Thought on October 1, 2009 at 5:24 PM

This is the start of WWIII.

upinak on October 1, 2009 at 5:25 PM

He doesn’t know how to deal with international relations. Only how to subjugate existing systems for socialist control.

At his level, however, there are no existing systems to subjugate. So without his marxist rudder, he’s powerless.

As for the Iranians. Diplomatic stalling tactic. “See? We’re safe… we’re so weak and unskilled that Russia must enrich our fuel…” Never mind that second, buried reactor we never talk about…

Skywise on October 1, 2009 at 5:26 PM

president p*ssy, you are an EPIC FAILURE!

HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 5:26 PM

John Stossel nailed it today when he indicated obama will call success at any outcome. Outright failure, Obama will call it productive. Failed talks? It’ll be constructive dialogue. He lives in an alternate reality and cannot realistically judge events which happen to contain him.

ted c on October 1, 2009 at 5:26 PM

Time for somebody to transfer those “Duck and Cover” films to DVD. They’ll be as useless as this President. Achmedinejad and the boys are laughing their tails off at President Pantywaist as we speak.

kingsjester on October 1, 2009 at 5:27 PM

He’s like the kid on the playground that always says, “Yeah, I can take ya!” and will never fight….

ted c on October 1, 2009 at 5:27 PM

Wait a minute, so the Ruskies will enrich to 19+%, BFD! I’m not a physics guy so someone correct me if I am wrong here. But could’nt they just take the Ruskie fuel and further enrich it to 90% by simply dropping it back into their own centerfuges?

I need a resident HA egg-head on this one as this not my forte, can someone step up on this issue please?

Archimedes on October 1, 2009 at 5:27 PM

“It was very constru–” BOOM!

Rational Thought on October 1, 2009 at 5:24 PM

Tru Dat.

*Begins digging underground bunker*

HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 5:28 PM

ted c on October 1, 2009 at 5:26 PM

9.4% unemployment, on the way to recovery…it’s a good sign.

right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 5:28 PM

It seems to me that the Iranians were offered a deal like this several years ago and it fell through. In the end they did not live up to their end of the bargain and backed out of the deal.

I will believe there is progress, when I see proof of it.

Terrye on October 1, 2009 at 5:29 PM

A strong majority is ready for mayhem. Obama is going to be feeling embarrassed about increased tweaking. Then Iran does something that he takes as a person affront. Then he overcompensates and overreacts. I’m just making this up, but this limpness feels unstablizing to me.

exception on October 1, 2009 at 5:32 PM

Translation:

“I Lost”.

Del Dolemonte on October 1, 2009 at 5:32 PM

This is a dangerous world, and this cat isn’t remotely qualified to handle it. This guy has no clue, I promise you.
~~George W. Bush

sannhet on October 1, 2009 at 5:33 PM

“My good friends, this is the second time in our history that there has come back from Iran to Washington peace with honour. I believe it is peace for our time. We thank you from the bottom of our hearts. And now I recommend you to go home and sleep quietly in your beds.”

Caper29 on October 1, 2009 at 5:33 PM

wtf….
we are just giving them time.
Dear Leader is *such* a weakling.

nyx on October 1, 2009 at 5:33 PM

Thanks, AP. Best explanation I’ve read so far.

Still, I’m lacking perspective:
1) It’s taken Iran all this time to get up to 3.5 percent? Based on our best estimates of their current technology, how much longer does it take to enrich to 20 percent, or even 90 percent?
2) What does 1,200 Kg of uranium really mean? Is this a lot, or a drop in the bucket? Enough for one, two, three bombs? What sort of estimates do we have on worldwide uranium production, and does this represent a big chunk?

John the Libertarian on October 1, 2009 at 5:37 PM

We’re already involved in two wars with no end in sight and trillion dollar deficits – and a majority of Americans want to use force against Iran?

Make fun of Ron Paul all you want, but WHAT F*CKING PLANET ARE YOU PEOPLE LIVING ON?!?! “Using force” requires money and lives, neither of which we have to spare. I don’t agree with Paul’s blame-America-first attitude, but I simply can’t fathom the mentality of anyone who would want to use force against Iran after our two most recent military exercises have resulted in less than complete success.

We don’t have the resources to use force against Iran anymore than we have the resources to institute socialized health care. I hate to be obvious, but if Iran wants the bomb, we can’t stop them. This is real life – sometimes the bad guys win. The only way we should use force against Iran is if they attack us first. Other than that, we can’t do anything.

Threatening to use force against Iran is like a child threatening to hold her breath until she explodes. Jesus, get some perspective people.

Enrique on October 1, 2009 at 5:37 PM

Enrique on October 1, 2009 at 5:37 PM

I think the “Force” that everyone wants is in the belly of a plane… and it drops a load over some mountains.

upinak on October 1, 2009 at 5:39 PM

A la Strangelove, watch Barry’s left hand.

Christien on October 1, 2009 at 5:39 PM

But watch the media give him a big WIN for this….

pseudonominus on October 1, 2009 at 5:41 PM

John Stossel nailed it today when he indicated obama will call success at any outcome. Outright failure, Obama will call it productive. Failed talks? It’ll be constructive dialogue. He lives in an alternate reality and cannot realistically judge events which happen to contain him.

ted c on October 1, 2009 at 5:26 PM

Those are some bold and accurate words. I look forward to Stossel coming to fox.

jhffmn on October 1, 2009 at 5:41 PM

Make fun of Ron Paul all you want, but WHAT F*CKING PLANET ARE YOU PEOPLE LIVING ON?!?! “Using force” requires money and lives, neither of which we have to spare. I don’t agree with Paul’s blame-America-first attitude, but I simply can’t fathom the mentality of anyone who would want to use force against Iran after our two most recent military exercises have resulted in less than complete success.

I hope force is not the only way to deal with Iran, I am still holding out hope that the democracy forces in Iran will topple that government.

However, as crazy as you might think this is, if Iran gets that bomb and goes after Israel and starts an arms race in the Middle East…it could be a real disaster for all of us. What do you think would happen to the deficit if oil stopped flowing? Or if the whole region blew up or if Iran managed to nuke someone?

Terrye on October 1, 2009 at 5:41 PM

Enrique on October 1, 2009 at 5:37 PM

we dont need an invasion to knock out all of their weapons facilities

blatantblue on October 1, 2009 at 5:42 PM

but i get what you are saying.

blatantblue on October 1, 2009 at 5:42 PM

“Our patience is not unlimited.”

Or else what, Mr. Obama?

Good Lt on October 1, 2009 at 5:43 PM

I hope Netanyahu knows what to do next…

nyx on October 1, 2009 at 5:43 PM

I am not a nuclear physicist but, is it really a good idea to send enriched urnaium to Russia so they can enrich it and send it back? How do we know that Russian will hold up it’s end of the bargain? I think this is dangerous all the way around.

milwife88 on October 1, 2009 at 5:44 PM

Threatening to use force against Iran is like a child threatening to hold her breath until she explodes. Jesus, get some perspective people.

Enrique on October 1, 2009 at 5:37 PM

Yeah, you say that but look what he did to Joe the plumber…wait until Obama delivers his strongly worded message…don’t mess with Obama, Joe Biden has his back…

right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 5:44 PM

WTF?

“…constructive start, but Iran must live up to it’s committment to full transparency…”

You’re joking right? The bunker itself is demonstrable proof of non-transparency! The last twenty years has been proof of non-transparency! The very word “Iran” is bloody proof of non-transparency!

And forgive me if my memory fails me here, but I do not remember Iran ever making even a tacit committment to transparency in the first place! EVER!
WE ARE SO F%$KING SCRRRREEEEWWWWWD!

Archimedes on October 1, 2009 at 5:45 PM

blatantblue on October 1, 2009 at 5:42 PM

And seeing as their only AWAC ended up in a mid-air “mishap” a couple of weeks ago, and they have no “eye in the sky” to protect their skies.

right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM

We have a serious crisis of leadership. This may be the calm before the storm. Scary.

ronsfi on October 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM

I smell surrender….

But hey, how ’bout them Olympics, huh?

Osama Obama needs to be impeached before Israel is vaporized and the background radiation level here gets too high.

MrScribbler on October 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM

I love it. Obama’s been in office for just 8 months and has already gotten far more progress on the issue than Bush did in 8 years. Thus, all AP can muster to weakly mewl that the issue isnt completely resolved.

orange on October 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM

feels like dear leader is about to get punk’d

cmsinaz on October 1, 2009 at 5:20 PM

We all are. When he’s long gone from desecrating his Office, we’ll still be trying to deal with this mess.

Monica on October 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM

A “new” beginning?

How many “new” beginnings must we endure?

It has been 30 years since the mullahtocracy was installed in Tehran, and over the three decades Iran has done nothing positive at all in any sector to demonstrate that their intentions are benign. They retreat when they actually view and understand a real threat, and they advance in the face of real or perceived weakness. [Something in the Koran that spells it all out...sura anyone?]

As Iran makes new friends, or solidifies older friendships…Venezuela, Syria, China, Russia, et al., it should be apparent to any rational observer that they are buying time and Obama is willing to sell it to them.

Obama cannot make a decision. Above his pay grade.

Our present dithering in Afghanistan is seen by the mullahs as yet another great hope; we lose it in Afghanistan and Iran is free to act as they see fit. Obama heading off to do yet another campaign stop on Copenhagen surely puts the feasr of God in the mullahs, ya think?

Bet they are trembling in their sandals waiting for another stern letter from Obama once they tell us to drop dead in the upcoming “negotiations.”

So, let’s have yet another “new” beginning with Iran…why not…new beginnings and hope and change are all that Obama is made of…nothing of substance, of course, and Iran can understand this readily. Carter 2.0 must really be a hit in Tehran.

coldwarrior on October 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM

I think we should trust the Iranians/Chinese/Russians. It’s worked well in the past!

Make fun of Ron Paul all you want, but WHAT F*CKING PLANET ARE YOU PEOPLE LIVING ON?!?! “Using force” requires money and lives, neither of which we have to spare. I don’t agree with Paul’s blame-America-first attitude, but I simply can’t fathom the mentality of anyone who would want to use force against Iran after our two most recent military exercises have resulted in less than complete success.

We don’t have the resources to use force against Iran anymore than we have the resources to institute socialized health care. I hate to be obvious, but if Iran wants the bomb, we can’t stop them. This is real life – sometimes the bad guys win. The only way we should use force against Iran is if they attack us first. Other than that, we can’t do anything.

Threatening to use force against Iran is like a child threatening to hold her breath until she explodes. Jesus, get some perspective people.

Enrique on October 1, 2009 at 5:37 PM

We don’t have the resources for nation building, but raw destruction? I think we can manage the necessary air strikes.

TheUnrepentantGeek on October 1, 2009 at 5:48 PM

I love it. Obama’s been in office for just 8 months and has already gotten far more progress on the issue than Bush did in 8 years. Thus, all AP can muster to weakly mewl that the issue isnt completely resolved.

orange on October 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM

BOOOOOOOSSHHHH!!!!

TheUnrepentantGeek on October 1, 2009 at 5:48 PM

How do we know that Russian will hold up it’s end of the bargain?

milwife88 on October 1, 2009 at 5:44 PM

Methinks this is their end of the deal if we take down the missile shield. I suspected there was more in play here, and a lot of face-saving going on. I mean, nobody would be that stupid to give up the missle-defense bargaining chip for nothing, right?

Bueller?

John the Libertarian on October 1, 2009 at 5:49 PM

Obama’s been in office for just 8 months and has already gotten far more progress on the issue than Bush did in 8 years.

orange on October 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM

Dangerously naive at best, Mr. Chamberlain.

John the Libertarian on October 1, 2009 at 5:51 PM

I am not a nuclear physicist but, is it really a good idea to send enriched urnaium to Russia so they can enrich it and send it back? How do we know that Russian will hold up it’s end of the bargain? I think this is dangerous all the way around.

milwife88 on October 1, 2009 at 5:44 PM

Isn’t Venezuela helping Russia WITH Uranium?

Yes… and I even blogged about it as it was China, Russia, Iran, and Venezeula all in one day and it was bothering me.

upinak on October 1, 2009 at 5:51 PM

So now we’re going to let Iran send the uranium it has said for years it never had to Russia so the Russians can enrich it and then give it back to the Iranians?

This is insane!

Now Iran gets exactly what it wants and no one can do anything. No one is going to attack Russia afterall. And if a few extra pounds of the “good stuff” get put in the shipment from either end, no one will know about it until it’s too late.

Why don’t we just let the Russians give them a few old warheads, cut out all this stupid diplomacy and be done with it!?

Enrique on October 1, 2009 at 5:37 PM

It won’t matter one way or the other you blithering moron.

Iran is the one who is going to force a hand on this – one way or the other, sooner or later form us or the Israelis.

catmman on October 1, 2009 at 5:52 PM

This is awesome. I’m going to Turkey next year. I can’t wait to see what unholy h*ll this version of the Munich agreement is going to cause.

mjk on October 1, 2009 at 5:53 PM

A “new” beginning?

How many “new” beginnings must we endure?

coldwarrior on October 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM

BHO: As long as it takes for Iran to get a nuclear weapon…hey, did I say that out loud?

nyx on October 1, 2009 at 5:53 PM

upinak on October 1, 2009 at 5:51 PM

Nothing like being surrounded huh? It only takes one nervous Nelly to make people glow in the dark.

milwife88 on October 1, 2009 at 5:55 PM

I think the “Force” that everyone wants is in the belly of a plane… and it drops a load over some mountains.

upinak on October 1, 2009 at 5:39 PM

More specifically each B-52 has a 60 ton “belly”, no ground pounders needed. Just Rolling Thunder ptII.

However I am still of a mind that the only way to acheive a significant set back to their program is a “magnetic-pulse” weapon to knock the entire above groung country back to the stone-age! Whatever “underground hardened facilities” you may have, if the elevatror up top, or the commo-links to are non-operable, or electrical delivery to said facility are ka-put, they are basically toothless as far as WMD’s go.

But you’d have plenty of problems still dealing with their proxies elsewhere, their is no “good” option. So take the best you can get, and that definately is not a nuclear capable Iran!

Archimedes on October 1, 2009 at 5:56 PM

He got nothing and iran is still building their nukes and missiles . . . who is this guy trying to kid? If you don’t feel very insecure then you probably need to have your nerve endings tested.

rplat on October 1, 2009 at 5:57 PM

Wasn’t Obambi going to give them until Oct.1 to show good faith??

How much weaker can he make us appear??

drjohn on October 1, 2009 at 5:58 PM

Obama will be on the ground, listening to this

right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 5:59 PM

So why didn`t Iran make this “deal” before?

-Why didn`t Iran just have Russia provide the uranium in the first place since they are also building the nuclear plant?

-Why did Iran go through all the expense and trouble to build refining plants to now say they are not going to use them?

-Don´t they have their own uranium mines (if you call them that) in Iran?

Meanwhile in Iran the Mullahs cannot stop laughing at how easily they can fool the Obama.

albill on October 1, 2009 at 6:01 PM

I love it. Obama’s been in office for just 8 months and has already gotten far more progress on the issue than Bush did in 8 years. Thus, all AP can muster to weakly mewl that the issue isnt completely resolved.

orange on October 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM

Are you off your effing meds? What progress, a peice of paper? A promise from someone who has never kept one, ever?

Dude, have you lost your effing mind?

Archimedes on October 1, 2009 at 6:02 PM

OT: Palin’s book cover released. NICE.

portlandon on October 1, 2009 at 6:02 PM

Obama, you are an unmitigated failure. It is truly embarassing to have you speak for our great nation. So, you decided to go ahead and shake with them even though they still have their fist clenched huh……

They are gaming you sucker, playing you like a violin. We are becoming the laughing stock of the world. You don’t think like and American. You don’t act like an American. YOu don’t have American values or ideals. Oh….I guess that is because you aren’t…. election day can’t come too soon…

highninside on October 1, 2009 at 6:05 PM

I love it. Obama’s been in office for just 8 months and has already gotten far more progress on the issue than Bush did in 8 years. Thus, all AP can muster to weakly mewl that the issue isnt completely resolved.

orange on October 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM

Hey, cupcake, he has already given up on our missile defense…you call that a success? He gave it up for what?

right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 6:05 PM

OT: Palin’s book cover released. NICE.

portlandon on October 1, 2009 at 6:02 PM

Classy…

right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 6:06 PM

My understanding is that once the enriched uranium is turned into fuel rod, it’s hard to get it back out and turn it into uranium hexafluoride again. The fuel rods would obviously go missing–somewhat hard to miss. If Iranians are doing to do something clandestinely, I think they would be better off setting up the centrifuge cascades to enrich from natural uranium to HEU directly.

year_of_the_dingo on October 1, 2009 at 6:10 PM

I love it. Obama’s been in office for just 8 months and has already gotten far more progress on the issue than Bush did in 8 years. Thus, all AP can muster to weakly mewl that the issue isnt completely resolved.

orange on October 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM

He’s given up a major portion of our security including our missile defense system and Iran is playing him like a banjo . . . yes indeed he certainly has done a lot. You liberals wouldl be sitting in the middle of a mushroom cloud saying “oh, how pretty”.

rplat on October 1, 2009 at 6:11 PM

I love it. Obama’s been in office for just 8 months and has already gotten far more progress on the issue than Bush did in 8 years. Thus, all AP can muster to weakly mewl that the issue isnt completely resolved.

orange on October 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM

That is a lie.

Terrye on October 1, 2009 at 6:13 PM

2) What does 1,200 Kg of uranium really mean? Is this a lot, or a drop in the bucket? Enough for one, two, three bombs? What sort of estimates do we have on worldwide uranium production, and does this represent a big chunk?

John the Libertarian on October 1, 2009 at 5:37 PM

1200kg of 3.5% Uranium contains 42kg of U235.
The critical mass of U235 about 50kg, so it’s not quite enough for a single bomb. But they required mass can be reduced by using material that reflects neutrons back that are trying to escape the bomb. I seem to remember the U235 required can be readily reduced to something like 40kg, but I could have that wrong. This type of weapon was more or less obsolete before it was ever used.

exception on October 1, 2009 at 6:14 PM

OT: Palin’s book cover released. NICE.

portlandon on October 1, 2009 at 6:02 PM

Man oh man, that’s inspiring. You just wanna be there, looking at whatever she’s looking at.

John the Libertarian on October 1, 2009 at 6:15 PM

exception on October 1, 2009 at 6:14 PM

Thanks for this. It’s still dangerous, but it sounds as though it’s a lot more meager than first feared. Depending, of course, on what they’re not telling us.

John the Libertarian on October 1, 2009 at 6:17 PM

Beginning in 2005, Bush suggested that Russia enrich uranium for Iran, under supervision by UN..if indeed all the Iranians wanted to do was create energy. However, the Iranians messed up the deal. In 2007, the Russians actually gave them some sort of ultimatum saying they would have to do this or face sanctions…and here we are today acting as if this all some brand spanking new idea that Obama just thought up.

I will believe it when I see it. And even then I will have my doubts.

Terrye on October 1, 2009 at 6:17 PM

“Our patience is not unlimited.

Uh,uh, uh, what’s just below that??

drjohn on October 1, 2009 at 6:18 PM

Hey, cupcake, he has already given up on our missile defense…you call that a success? He gave it up for what?

right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 6:05 PM

So that Russia could also help Iran enrich their uranium further?

Loxodonta on October 1, 2009 at 6:19 PM

Loxodonta:

I would think the smart thing to do would be to wait until the deed was done, the deal was made and there was real progress…giving Russia what they want upfront does not give them any incentive to stick with the plan.

and the Russians are still dragging their feet on sanctions too.

Meanwhile, they are working with Chavez.

Terrye on October 1, 2009 at 6:21 PM

It’s still dangerous, but it sounds as though it’s a lot more meager than first feared. Depending, of course, on what they’re not telling us.

John the Libertarian on October 1, 2009 at 6:17 PM

You asked the right question. Something’s fishy. If this is a significant amount of their material, then it all not such a big deal. Even with this Russian work they still have to enrich it from 20% to 80-90%.

If this is not a significant chunk of Iran’s U, then this is a distraction. Considering how involved it is it seems like a deliberate distraction.

I’m going to try to find out what Iran’s declared Uranium inventories are.

exception on October 1, 2009 at 6:27 PM

I’d rather laugh than cry about something so momentous over which I have no control. Only the invincible ignorant believe that Iran has any intention of giving up on the Bomb and using it. Every time I heard someone commenting positively on this idiocy today, including Fox news reporters, I just had to laugh out loud. And so are the Iranians. The boy-king and his regents are playing and losing with our future at stake.
Randy

williars on October 1, 2009 at 6:27 PM

Why don’t we just let the Russians give them a few old warheads, cut out all this stupid diplomacy and be done with it!?

Enrique on October 1, 2009 at 5:37 PM

Better yet, why does’nt Obama quit F%$king around and give them our weapons, that would seem to acheive his true goals best.

Archimedes on October 1, 2009 at 6:27 PM

O/T, but not really because it also pertains to Barry’s ongoing stupidity-

When are they supposed to announce the Olympic decision?

And I’m sorry if this offends anyone, but I hope we lose.

anniekc on October 1, 2009 at 6:30 PM

Terrye on October 1, 2009 at 6:21 PM

Obama is giving away the store and getting nothing in return. Therefore, friendly competitors, potential enemies and actual enemies of America are going to take advantage of this. Eventually, there will be a price to pay.

I hope Americans, Israelis and Poles don’t have to pay with their lives before Obama is replaced with a president that will defend American interests.

Loxodonta on October 1, 2009 at 6:31 PM

Americans never forget 9/11 because our president has.

shick on October 1, 2009 at 6:34 PM

If Iranians are doing to do something clandestinely, I think they would be better off setting up the centrifuge cascades to enrich from natural uranium to HEU directly.

year_of_the_dingo on October 1, 2009 at 6:10 PM

Which they have already done, and have running…

This uranium is EXTRA…

Bolivia and Venezuela seem to be suppliers…

http://www.startribune.com/world/61485012.html?elr=KArks:DCiUBcy7hUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUr

As well as some limited local sources…

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iran/mines.htm

Romeo13 on October 1, 2009 at 6:35 PM

So, there gonna take the deal the EU offered, what, two years ago?

And NOW we’re supposed to be happy about that?

Obama’s just phoning it in now.

LifeTrek on October 1, 2009 at 6:38 PM

BTW, I seem to recall another time the west abandoned the Czechs, received a paper with concessions written on it, and claimed victory in the name of peace.

LifeTrek on October 1, 2009 at 6:40 PM

Sarah’s book cover….dynamite!!!

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/01/print/main5356793.shtml

highninside on October 1, 2009 at 6:47 PM

Act Two of the Obama Kabuki Dance.

MB4 on October 1, 2009 at 6:49 PM

“What is damn fool, Alex?”
Trebek: Correct for $2000
SouthernGent on October 1, 2009 at 5:22 PM

LOL (to keep from screaming)

Ayatollah so!

Drained Brain on October 1, 2009 at 6:50 PM

Just as Robert Gibbs is Baghdad Bob’s replacement, Barack Obama is Joe Isuzu’s replacement.

MB4 on October 1, 2009 at 6:52 PM

I love the title of that video clip “Obama demands transparency“…look who’s talking.

Vigilante on October 1, 2009 at 6:52 PM

As CK just said on FNC, this is a complete victory for Iran.

It’s also a willing charade on the part of both parties, because both parties have an identity of interests. Both parties want mainly to buy time, to postpone a showdown until extraneous goals are accomplished. Dinnerjacket wants to buy time until he gets a few nukes. Obama wants to buy time until he gets ObamasCare and otherwise nukes the domestic economy. Both want simply to buy time.

petefrt on October 1, 2009 at 6:53 PM

I think 1,200 kg is about what the Natanz facility can produce in a year at its current capacity. It wouldn’t be a huge price to pay to buy some extra time.

year_of_the_dingo on October 1, 2009 at 7:04 PM

And this little piggy cried wee wee all the way to Copenhagen.

He & the Mrs are A national disgrace.

bluegrass on October 1, 2009 at 7:04 PM

“Peace with Honor”

drjohn on October 1, 2009 at 7:07 PM

Barry has a habit of telling opponents he’s losing patience… as if anyone ever gave a rat’s ass that he’s losing patience. What a tool.

We’ll live to regret this supposed deal, if it comes to pass. You can’t negotiate with a duplicitous madman.

redfoxbluestate on October 1, 2009 at 7:24 PM

Comment pages: 1 2