What a wonderful opportunity.

If he lives that long on the inside.

No matter what the Hollywood ME Worshipers think, or the jury that never heard this case might have thought, there is one jury that thinks very little of f****** little girls (as Polanski chortled in his ’79 interview), that’s the jury of his peers, inside a California State Correctional Institution.

I can predict their verdict. And predict, as well, that it will be swift and painful.

The government could spend its money on other things.

The goverment’s money, eh?

So the Left’s standard of justice is now “How much will it cost?”

So who is Roman dating these days?

albill on October 1, 2009 at 5:16 PM

With any luck, it will soon be a guy named Bubba.

Compare and contrast:

. . . but to suggest that a sexy 13 year old (there are some WELL developed 13 year olds) asking for sex would be the worst crime possible completely misunderstands human nature.

Guys like sex. The whole ‘to catch a predator’ thing is based on this premise. Even if an underaged girl begs you to come over and have sex with her, you are required to deny your natural urges and say no – or you break the law.

Thirteen year old girls in this day and age are perfectly capable of making decisions about what they want and don’t want. . . look at their shopping habits.

ThackerAgency on September 29, 2009 at 9:58 AM

and

If I had killed somebody, it wouldn’t have had so much appeal to the press, you see? But… f******, you see, and the young girls. Judges want to f*** young girls. Juries want to f*** young girls. Everyone wants to f*** young girls!

Roman Polanski – child rapist – 1979 interview

I can’t tell any substantive differences, can you?

Weinstein’s fingers are all over the place.

No Fraggle Rock movie for my kids.

It doesn’t matter but I can see why he would turn to drugging. It is really yucky – the Hollywood crowd is nursing a kind of freak to their bosom. Who do they think he is Toulouse Lautrec?

As an after thought, if this imbecile from the Feminist Majority ever ends up as the “involuntary recipient of a male reproductive assembly”, do you think she’ll be so blase?

Aaarrrrrghhhhhhh!

All I want to do is take my 10 year old to see an animated movie this weekend as the rain pours down and now I’m looking at an hour or two of research to find out how many of these depraved, godless kooks were involved and whether I can spend the $20 or not? Our world really sucks.

gopmom on October 1, 2009 at 8:00 PM

I know. =/ My daughter really wants to see The Fantastic Mr Fox. Stupid Wes Anderson.

Did Polanski have any connection to the movie ‘Lolita’?

That would have been unbearably sweet-sweet shadenfreude!

Ogabe on October 1, 2009 at 6:46 PM

He did make Chinatown, which is about a dirty old man who rapes a girl, raises their daughter to adolescence, and tries to rape her, and in the end walks off with the girl…

“It’s bad a person was raped. But that was so many years ago. The guy has been through so much in his life. It’s crazy to arrest him now. Let it go. The government could spend its money on other things.”

But be Clarence Thomas with the allegation of a comment hanging over your head involving pubic hair and a can of coke……well if the left haid their way, he’d be ready for parole in about a year if they had their way.

All I want to do is take my 10 year old to see an animated movie this weekend as the rain pours down and now I’m looking at an hour or two of research to find out how many of these depraved, godless kooks were involved and whether I can spend the $20 or not? Our world really sucks.

I knew it. People who behave as cravenly as Polanski did with the 13-year old victim (about whom he’s been charged and found guilty) RARELY ever limit this offense to “just” one victim. Likely as not, Polanski’s been doing this to many, many victims for a long time.

Ugly does not even come close to calling him what he is. Detestable fails, too.

PEDOPHILE PIG! PEDOPHILE PIG!

bannedbyhuffpo on October 1, 2009 at 6:55 PM

FIFY.

The girl Polanski RAPED was A THIRTEEN YEAR OLD JUNIOR HIGH EIGHTH GRADER for Chrissake!!

After he fled the U.S. justice system in 1979, he hid in France and immediately began RAPING a FIFTEEN YEAR OLD Nastassja Kinski.

Castrate this sick degenerate slime pig, lock him up, and throw away the key.

Sorry you brilliant Hollywood “progressives” … Polanski deserves no special consideration for being an “artist”!

He’s a filthy, perverted, dirty old man lecher. And needs to be dealth with as such by civilized society.

…nobody ever “gets over” child abuse. It’s a gift that keeps on giving, as I’m sure you learned from your ex-wife.

warbaby on October 1, 2009 at 6:49 PM

You are SO right on that, and you just exploded the notion of Polanski’s defenders that Samantha’s forgiveness of Polanski somehow annuls his actions. Not to try putting you on a poster, but you remind of a powerful point about people who have never been victims deny as if they know better.

I live among liberals, too, in the artsy-craftsy part of Buffalo. My son once quipped the most conservative man he knows chooses to live in the most liberal part of town.

For what it’s worth, you’re doing okay. You seem not only a survivor but more a winner.

Hollywood will be what it is; those people tend to sit around ‘yessing’ themselves to death and feel all warm and squishy for it. Would only those elites dare come down to be average people like you, me, and the others who post here.

Regards,
Liam