It’s come to this: Polanski’s suffered enough, says … feminist leader; Update: Polanski memoir recounts more underaged girls
posted at 4:17 pm on October 1, 2009 by Allahpundit
Another gold nugget buried in that LA Times piece that Ed linked earlier, even purer and finer than the quote from Harvey Weinstein trumpeting Hollywood’s famous, er, moral compass.
Honestly, at the rate we’re going, it can’t be long before some celebrity and/or liberal tells us that the kid was asking for it.
Jonathan Kuntz, a visiting professor in UCLA’s Cinema and Media Studies school, said the local reaction may be a version of the “there, but for the grace of God, go I.” “I think that there are a lot of folks in Hollywood in the late ’60s and ’70s who may have done a lot of things they weren’t really proud of, and may have been participating in very similar things,” Kuntz said. “And it touches on a question that’s been around for a long time: whether the celebrity is above the law.”
Some of the industry’s most prominent women said they believe Polanski, who faces a sentence as low as probation and as high as 16 months in prison for pleading guilty to having sex with a minor, should be freed. “My personal thoughts are let the guy go,” said Peg Yorkin, founder of the Feminist Majority Foundation. “It’s bad a person was raped. But that was so many years ago. The guy has been through so much in his life. It’s crazy to arrest him now. Let it go. The government could spend its money on other things.”
In fairness to the sisterhood, this sort of cretinism appears to be an outlier. NOW dropped the hammer on Polanski apologists last night and Katha Pollitt took off the gloves early this morning. Quote: “That some of his defenders are women is particularly disappointing. Don’t they see how they are signing on to arguments that blame the victim, minimize rape, and bend over backwards to exonerate the perpetrator? Error of youth, might have mistaken her age, teen slut, stage mother–is that what we want people to think when middle-aged men prey on ninth-graders?” Click through and read down to the end for the final, devastating line, which captures just how much of a bipartisan PR catastrophe this is turning into for Hollywood. I’m skeptical that there’ll be financial consequences, but Weinstein, at least, sounds vain and stupid enough to pursue his defense of a child-rapist to the very end. The longer this drags on, the bigger and more bitter the backlash gets. Frankly, I hope they go all-in; I’m more curious than ever to see where else that famous “moral compass” points.
I’ve been pushing this piece by a child-rape survivor on Twitter and in Headlines but let me take the opportunity to push it again here. It starts brutal and gets more brutal as it goes along. Don’t miss it. Exit question: Has anyone read the source material for the detail on Wikipedia that Polanski started, ahem, “dating” Nastassja Kinski when she was 15? The footnotes link to a book that’s not online and a movie I haven’t seen. Anyone out there able to confirm/deny that this has been reported somewhere besides Wikipedia?
Update: Exit question answered by Reason’s Matt Welch, who flags this passage from Polanski’s memoir involving Kinski a.k.a. “Nasty.”
One day a German gossip columnist invited me out on a double date with two girls he wante me to meet. Both were young and, in different ways, strikingly beautiful. One of them was rather dowdily dressed. I asked her name. “My friends call me Nasty,” she said. [...] Very late that night, after a long round of discos, the four of us ended up in my suite. Leaving Nasty with the journalist, I took the other girl, a stunning blonde, to bed. By the time I surfaced the journalist had gone. Nasty was half-asleep in an armchair in the sitting room. Taking her by the hand, I led her back into the bedroom.
We never repeated this threesome, though I saw a lot of both girls thereafter. I dated the blonde for several weeks, but it was Nasty who grew on me more and more. [...]
Nastassia introdued me to her mother, who discussed her career with me [...]. That was when I first learned Nastassia’s age. She was only fifteen.
We made love more than once during my three months in Munich. [...] On the night we met I’d thought her a couple of years older than her friend, who was, in fact, seventeen.
Exit question: How many more teenyboppers has he, ahem, “made love” to?










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Relentless…a person defending a child rapist deserves nothing less.
The weird part is he advertises his agency through his posted name…would you do business with a person who excuses a pervert?
right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 5:03 PM
Pedophilia is incurable. Some are so messed up they dress their bedrooms like as might a child. The ailment is complex, and the only way to stop them is by permanent incarceration or execution.
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 5:03 PM
FIFY
Loxodonta on October 1, 2009 at 5:04 PM
Barbara Leaming’s book on Polanski:
http://www.amazon.com/Polanski-Barbara-leaming/dp/0671249851
Leaming’s trade seems to be biographies of famous women — she’s done Katherine Hepburn, Marilyn Monroe, Rita Hayworth,Jackie Kennedy,…
…and Roman Polanski. Hmm.
unclesmrgol on October 1, 2009 at 5:05 PM
When this story broke I could have cared less.Now with all the push back from the left I hope he gets his buns buttered.More than once.
docflash on October 1, 2009 at 5:06 PM
Absolutely, Abby.
HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 5:06 PM
I would say the left had lost their minds…if they had minds to lose in the first place…..
Okay for me….not for thee….the new democratic motto.
HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM
Evidently ONE is never enough for Roman.
GarandFan on October 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM
Polanski…repeat offender. Hollywood…repeat excuser.
MaaddMaaxx on October 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM
Can we feed them to sharks?
I’m in!
HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM
Hey, it’s bad a person was killed, but that was many years ago…….wadda ya say we let Charlie Manson out of jail. I hear he writes some good music on his guitar, so support the arts and all that, eh ???
Let’s ask the douchebag Polanski what he thinks about that.
Jerome Horwitz on October 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM
Yeah, he was suffering in Europe….way to go Peg…good call Kuntz, you putz.
right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM
I’ll see no justice in this sordid affair until Polanski’s 300 lb cellmate “dates” him without using the Crisco.
Zorg on October 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM
absolute sicko….is there a level of Hell for boneheads like him?
cmsinaz on October 1, 2009 at 5:10 PM
Absolute proof that Feminism was never about setting women free.
Chaz706 on October 1, 2009 at 5:10 PM
He’ll be bunking with John Couey….burning in hell as we speak.
HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 5:11 PM
sounds good
cmsinaz on October 1, 2009 at 5:11 PM
Back then, it was common knowledge. Nobody tried to hide it. Try People Magazine from that time period.
Blake on October 1, 2009 at 5:11 PM
r
I never looked at his moniker to be a legitimate business address and, really, I rather not. If I do, I’m going to all his clients and destroy him. I rather not get involved so deeply; he’ll become his own undoing without me being sued for slander and/or libel. If you look at his most recent posts, he’s already becoming undone.
He’s also into getting noticed. When logical arguments call him on his shit, and especially when he starts being ignored, he becomes more insane and offensive in his remarks. He has gone from defending Polanski to all but claiming the notion of raping little girls is ‘going out on a limb’ when people like you and me revile that notion.
Not even AnninCA is that bad.
We have not only a troll in our midst with this one, but a true psychopath who gets into pissing us off.
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 5:11 PM
Indeed. Or Larry Craig. Leno, Conan, MSNBC and all the other ass kissing whores at GE/NBC still can’t shut up about Larry Craig but they’ll be silent at best about Polanski. Larry Craig tries – unsuccessfully – to get his weird-beard gay freak on in a public bathroom and Leno does jokes about it for years; Polanski ass rapes a 13 year old girl and – whoa! – circle the wagons. One of “ours” is actually being held responsible for a felony that he confessed to.
Part of America’s problem is the sleep-like state so many people are in where they just drift along with the highly selective mores and attitudes of bozos like Leno.
Django on October 1, 2009 at 5:12 PM
Did you hear that Sharon Tate’s sister came out in defense of Polanski?
mizflame98 on October 1, 2009 at 5:12 PM
Women should be covered from head to toe in burkas and never be allowed to leave the home and tempt the natural instincts of men. Men have suffered enough from these rape charges.
— Peg Yorkin, founder of the Feminist Majority Foundation
Loxodonta on October 1, 2009 at 5:12 PM
Allah, do you really want to know?
upinak on October 1, 2009 at 5:12 PM
I could actually agree with her on that one.
At least where I grew up, trying Polanski by “the standards of the day” would have involved the girl’s father and a few close friends of his, a couple of shotguns and a few alligators getting a free meal. And no one would have shed a tear.
She ought to be careful what she wishes for.
Gator Country on October 1, 2009 at 5:12 PM
Page 210 on Amazon.com is the page. This link should take you directly to the page (you’ll have to log in to Amazon):
http://www.amazon.com/reader/0230607780?_encoding=UTF8&token=qCyedoYLRFdwOmRHcytBFy5jUo6ibGVQQJvrt5KBeiK0vLghsdhCNg%3D%3D&query=Kinski&page=228#reader
If that doesn’t work, just type in “Kinksi” in the box to the left.
eforhan on October 1, 2009 at 5:12 PM
Oops! She was 17 when they filmed Tess but I remember reading that he was boinking her when she was 15 in conjunction with publicity with that film.
Blake on October 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Q: Why hasn’t a reporter asked for a quote from Elizabeth Smart about Polanski?
A: Fear that America’s sweetheart survivor will say the wrong thing.
ScottMcC on October 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM
I see the update and I am not surprised, this sort of behavior is rarely a one time thing. The man is a sex offender. He is the kind of guy who can’t live near schools and who has to notify local police departments when he moves into a neighborhood, that sort of thing.
Anyone read Lolita? Roman prefers nymphets. Nasty little man.
Terrye on October 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Meet you by the sea with the criminals ready to be tossed in. Then duck, when the sharks puke them out.
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Who’d thunk I’d agree with Katha Pollitt?
I think there is a lot of amazing stuff happening, not only with this Polanski case…it’s like there are a whole bunch of rocks (or Acorns) being turned over and America is getting a good close look at the scuttling insects underneath. If not for the blogs, none of these issues would have legs.
I want to see somewhere (does someone have a link?) a list of these “friends” of Polanski, cause I wonn’t spend one dime to partake in any of their “art”.
Catherine Wilkinson on October 1, 2009 at 5:15 PM
On Roman Polanski, who directed her in Tess (1979): “As a director, he was 10 times more wonderful than as a lover.” from Kinski’s IMDB page. Creepy.
UnLiberaledWoman on October 1, 2009 at 5:15 PM
So who is Roman dating these days?
albill on October 1, 2009 at 5:16 PM
I’m really starting to think that the Left wants SHITRIA Law in this country. I’m surprised they’re not demanding the execution of the victim for dishonoring her family.
ronnyraygun on October 1, 2009 at 5:16 PM
Not a problem, give her the key and let her release Charles Manson…after all he has paid a severe price. And how does she know that her sister didn’t want to commit suicide, and Manson just helped her?
I swear, Hollywood is sicker then I ever imagined…
right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 5:16 PM
He’s a sick bastard, and so are the people who defend him.
NebCon on October 1, 2009 at 5:17 PM
Deal. Can we throw in some politicians for flavor?
HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 5:17 PM
AP
I have the Biography mentioned.It does say on page 155 Kinski became Polanski’s lover at 15. He was her patrone, paying for acting lessons, etc. It also mentions later that Kinski became an issue during the sentencing phase because Polanski had her visit him in LA and Munich. The Judge was concerned but Polanksi insisted it was professional and she was always accompanied by a chaperone. Polanski himself says he became interested in Kinski after seeing her appear nude in a Mastroianni film at 13.
Rocks on October 1, 2009 at 5:18 PM
I agree. It is almost a parody, a caricature. I don’t know if it is the frustration or if they are just trying to change the subject or what, but they are just acting nuts.
BTW, I saw that for some reason Obama has come up in the polls a couple of points in the last few days. Why? What got better?
The truth is when I see polls that show the left does not have a majority on any single issue, I find it hard to believe that Obama has an approval rating over 50%. But what do I know?
Terrye on October 1, 2009 at 5:18 PM
She said the report of her date of birth is wrong, she was actually born 2 years later…something about work permits.
right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 5:18 PM
The next thing up is Hollywood all the way, an all star cast to sing She Had It Comin and Whose sorry Now.
mkm19602000 on October 1, 2009 at 5:19 PM
I did a LexisNexis search. This fact concerning Kinski is apparent stated in his autobiography, “Roman by Polanski.” Here’s what a book review in the Globe and Mail (Canada) said:
year_of_the_dingo on October 1, 2009 at 5:19 PM
Hornet! I accuse you of cruelty to sharks!
Loxodonta on October 1, 2009 at 5:19 PM
Hey I was right! It was in People Magazine. You know you are a geezer when you can remember things from 30 years ago but not where you put your glasses.
Blake on October 1, 2009 at 5:19 PM
Oh, why scrimp? Let’s go for all!
And they buy the beer.
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 5:20 PM
Hey! I left room for the sharks to yak then out!
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 5:21 PM
Do you think Jack Nicholson knew what he was like when he let him stay at his house? I would be really pissed off if a house guest used my house to rape and sodomize a 13 year old.
Terrye on October 1, 2009 at 5:22 PM
Liam is going to get them drunk on beer before we toss the politicians in.
HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 5:22 PM
Ain’t that the truth.
Terrye on October 1, 2009 at 5:22 PM
The Left cares about women, minorities, soldiers, civilians and children only when they are useful for the acquisition of power or the destruction of their enemies.
29Victor on October 1, 2009 at 5:23 PM
After that update I don’t know if I should first vomit or take multiple baths…
I’m going with vomiting and then baths…
Branch Rickey on October 1, 2009 at 5:24 PM
Exactamundo, as the Fonz used to say.
Clenis did the following:
1. Sexually exploited a workplace subordinate, in the workplace.
2. Asked her to lie about it under oath, a felony.
3. Lied about it himself to a Federal Grand Jury, also a felony calling for a 3 year prison sentence.
4.Earlier had his Justice Department successfully prosecute a female Federal employee for lying under oath about the same thing.
5. Had a prominent writer for TIME magazine offer to take Monica’s place.
Had a Republican President done the exact same things, he would be taken out back and shot, likely in the nether regions.
Move along, folks, no double standard here.
Del Dolemonte on October 1, 2009 at 5:24 PM
She was born in 1961 and Tess was filmed in 1978. That makes her 17. However, it appears he was boinking her before the film.
Blake on October 1, 2009 at 5:24 PM
The left never cares for the soldiers. obama is making that QUITE CLEAR.
HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 5:25 PM
I wonder if polanski’s defenders think these 3 should be let go as well.
redshirt on October 1, 2009 at 5:25 PM
This man is too sick for words. I cannot even believe even Hollywood would be this twisted. I feel so awful for this girl and the many girls that are victim to this degenerate. I feel even sicker to learn all these idiots defending him. They should be a list where these folks are permanently blacklisted or everytime their name comes in the credits it should end with “defender of child molester Polanski”. Sick Sick Sick.
nyx on October 1, 2009 at 5:27 PM
The beer is for us, and Lox. Not the sharks. The politicians pay for the brews. I hope you guys like Sam Adams.
The sharks are on their own, but maybe I’ll cast something to settle their stomachs after they yak up those politicians we feed them.
Hey–where’s my fave heartless psycho who claims to have a heart–AnninCA? Anybody seen my baby since Hollywood Leftists started coming out against the kiddie-rapist-at-large?
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 5:27 PM
Helen Thomas.
Del Dolemonte on October 1, 2009 at 5:29 PM
Easy rider was yaking all over the threads this morning.
HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM
Okay, I give up. Wiki says she was born in 1961. I know the film was made in 1978. She says he slept with her in 1978. I googled her dob and I get different hits, such as 1959.
Blake on October 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM
Are the feminists and Hollywood elite going to defend Elizabeth Smart’s abductor/rapist? She was 14 years old, taken/held against her will, plied with drugs&alcohol and repeatedly raped? Is this considered rape-rape? And if not, why aren’t the nitwits in H-wood defending Elizabeth’s rapist? I am getting more and more confused each day?!
jen on October 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM
I know many of you have seen this already, but I’m sorry this is too sick to ignore! Thacker, I hope you’re not hanging out outside of some middle school looking for a WELL developed 8th grader.
thevastlane on October 1, 2009 at 5:33 PM
Side note: Has anyone ever read whether Jerzy Kosinki’s novel “The Painted Bird” was based, in part, on Polanski’s real life experiences during the Holocaust?
I understand the two were close friends.
SteveMG on October 1, 2009 at 5:34 PM
Me, too, Friend. I can’t find justifying someone who sleeps with an underage girl, even if he was drunk off his ass and been begged for it.
But premeditated drugging and all else Polanski did–no excuse at all.
Know what? I’ll let Polanski off in full if all his supporters go to prison in his stead, to the fullest extent of the law.
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 5:35 PM
Kinski looked 15 when she was 15. Does Polanski really think every girl is over 18? He does remind me of some pedophiles I’ve heard. They will tell you that the girl really wanted it, that she was the one coming on to them. Uh, the girl was only 6 years old, jacka$$!
Blake on October 1, 2009 at 5:35 PM
This statement from the Goolrick article really struck me:
Blake on October 1, 2009 at 5:38 PM
Many of us are keeping Thacker’s posts for later use. Stand fast, and let things happen. He’s not in this thread for a reason: you, me, and others have him profiled; we have him on his own words. Due time…
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 5:38 PM
Hey Hollywood, let me put this in a way you can maybe understand:
Vito Corleone knew how to deal with a filmmaker who raped underage age girls.
Bruno Strozek on October 1, 2009 at 5:38 PM
Well, it seems like the same trash in Hollywood also support cop killers, Mumia…I say Fry Mumia!, myself.
They are on the wrongside of humanity and should be treated as such.
HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 5:38 PM
She had already starred in some films…he new exactly who she was and how old…
right2bright on October 1, 2009 at 5:39 PM
Del, that was beneath you.
What’s interesting is that, when I did the google search to find out what Helen really thinks about Polanski, this post and your comment were already up.
Google is amazing. And Helen appears to be silent. No dog in this hunt, maybe.
unclesmrgol on October 1, 2009 at 5:41 PM
Suffered? He won’t know the meaning of the word until he bends over to pick up the soap in the shower when he starts his prison term.
VoyskaPVO on October 1, 2009 at 5:42 PM
Think this whole episode has been revealing for the American people to see the real “compassion” of the Hollywood left. (Compassion for the perps, especially leftist perps vs. the victims.) These people live in a different country than most of us morally. Yet they are in public service announcements on TV showing US how to live. Are you kidding me? Hope everyone who signed the petition has it backfire in the careers, salaries and box office receipts.
Christian Conservative on October 1, 2009 at 5:43 PM
And now Whoopi tells us it not “rape-rape” so it’s okay…and this is the spokesperson for Toys R Us? Child advocate?
You may want to let corporate know what it will take to get you to shop there this Christmas…
http://www4.toysrus.com/guest/contUs.cfm
scituate_tgr on October 1, 2009 at 5:44 PM
I’m surprised no one is paying more attention to the history with his wife, Emmanuelle Seigner. True, they didn’t get married until she was 23, but he had a long, um, fascination with her that started when she began her modeling career at age 14 in France (and conveniently, that coincided with when Polanski had just fled back there). His film Bitter Moon is semi-biographical, and a weird monument to their marriage.
I_C on October 1, 2009 at 5:44 PM
You’re right. And they weren’t bit parts, either. It’s like when he uses the same excuse with the LA victim ignoring the fact that he obtained permission from her mother because he knew she was underage.
Blake on October 1, 2009 at 5:48 PM
They’re probably watching me.
Well, let them.
Let them see what kind of a person I am.
I’m not even going to swat that fly.
I hope they are watching… they’ll see.
They’ll see and they’ll know, and they’ll say,
“Why, she wouldn’t even harm a fly…”
LOL*
Loxodonta on October 1, 2009 at 5:49 PM
Confirming my suspicions that the institution of feminism, in regards to bringing about equity and justice, is worse than useless.
Dark-Star on October 1, 2009 at 5:50 PM
You can learn a lot about liberals by the pedophiles they defend.
Roy Rogers on October 1, 2009 at 5:51 PM
Zorg on October 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM
A friend of mine told me about her son. He was raped as a kid, went on drugs, eventually ended up in jail for setting his cheating wife’s house on fire. He was fine in jail until a fellow inmate made the mistake of bragging about molesting a 3-year-old.
My friend said her son said you’d never guess how many male inmates started going the wrong direction after they were sexually molested as a kid. Like the author of the piece AP mentioned, their whole life is impacted.
Maybe somebody here knows, but I think they generally have to keep child molesters separate, to keep the other inmates from killing them.
My friend’s son would have killed that guy if somebody hadn’t pulled him off him.
justincase on October 1, 2009 at 5:51 PM
Can we broaden the scope of this to include the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition (that no one EXPECTS–ha! headed you off )?
NTXLass on October 1, 2009 at 5:51 PM
Liberals have always been on the wrong side of history and the law. They’re never going to change, really, because THEY change, to suit the moment they think is valuable. Consistency and constancy is a concept alien to them, unlike how it is among you, me, and most others here.
But now we have a new chance, brought by the Hollywood elite. They’re in schism now over Romie, the rapist and sodomizer of little girls. This is a golden opportunity, to watch the Left fight itself. Some of them are actually going to agree with you, me, and others here. I find it sweet and useful.
Tactics, tactics, tactics. If the Left opposed us about Romie, and now some of their top people are agreeing with us, we just scored something. Now to make use of it, albeit quietly.
Remember: if we get the Left on our side for something, we won something bigger than politics.
Cook up that popcorn!
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 5:51 PM
If nobody knows where I am, and nobody even cares, I am safe.
Then again, if I checked into a motel and someone there did care, I’d probably freak out.
I have big problems with this guy’s article. He tries to convert what should be a slam dunk into a reasoning exercise with the perverts, and tries to do so using statistics which are questionable at best. His opponents will fixate on the broken stats, and he will fail.
It’s enough to say “He did the crime, now he needs to do the time.” Very conservative, concise, and to the point. Then his opponents’ only valid debating approach is to convince him and the rest of us that there wasn’t a crime.
Fat chance.
unclesmrgol on October 1, 2009 at 5:51 PM
What was wrong with the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition?
unclesmrgol on October 1, 2009 at 5:53 PM
You’re right. I just hope he’s not out somewhere acting on his “natural urges”.
thevastlane on October 1, 2009 at 5:54 PM
If he does, I hope his victim owns a concealed-carry permit.
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 5:58 PM
Good point, though I don’t think their intellectual inconsistencies/dishonesty matters to them one lick.
Diane on October 1, 2009 at 5:58 PM
I understand that both Bill Maher and Michael Moore (one wears a ridiculous baseball hat all the time, in case you get them confused) support extraditing Polanski.
Which really causes me to reconsider my view that Polanski needs to go to jail.
But not really…
SteveMG on October 1, 2009 at 6:01 PM
In re “feminism,” all that needs to be remembered is Nina Burleigh, whose response to the Clinton/Lewinski mess was “Hell, I’d give him a blowjob just for keeping abortion legal.”
“Feminism” is a cancer. Like every other “movement” whose name ends in “ism,” it’s about power, and nothing more. Somebody oughta ask Whoopi whether slave-rape was excusable on the grounds that the perpetrators were otherwise admirable people.
Polanski drugged and buggered a 13-year-old girl, period. I promise you that nobody, ever, gets over child abuse. If his victim now says she forgives him, all it proves is that she’s a hell of a lot better person than him or any of the scum defending him.
warbaby on October 1, 2009 at 6:02 PM
I read Polanski’s memoirs many years ago. There was a passage in which he describes sitting outside a private girl’s school in some foreign country…I don’t remember whether it was pre- or post- rape incident. he would sit outside in his car and watch the students go in and out of the school. Got a big kick out of it ya know, teens in their uniforms, etc.
surrounded on October 1, 2009 at 6:04 PM
Between this and healthcare, pass the salt!
HornetSting on October 1, 2009 at 6:05 PM
Ah, but now that cancer has turned upon itself. It has no place to go.
You’re quite right; I’m with you here. But Roman–a rapist and sodomizer of children–is forcing that cancer to consume itself.
I’m truly enjoying this, and hope you take some heart. You’re right, and me and others are with you.
We have a victory in process here. Enjoy! The enemy’s comeuppance is before our eyes. Revel in this time! Another might not come for a while.
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 6:09 PM
The beer is for us, and Lox. Not the sharks.
Hey, now. Sharks is people, too.
I R A Darth Aggie on October 1, 2009 at 6:09 PM
Nothing coming from the left shocks me anymore. The lunacy is pretty much expected.
alwaysright43 on October 1, 2009 at 6:10 PM
Arrives with butter
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 6:10 PM
I’d love to see someone ask Whoopi if she was okay with being raped, as long as it wasn’t “rape – rape.”
WWS on October 1, 2009 at 6:10 PM
Though his Hollywood defenders have been quick to claim he’s no longer a threat to the public, I had long wondered if she was the only one he raped. A man who thinks the only reason people cared about his story is because most men want to f- young girls isn’t likely to stop f-ing young girls. He doesn’t seem to see anything wrong with it, unfortunately, even when they say no (I’m not even convinced she’s the only one who said no).
In Germany, she could have been 14, and unless she said no or was coerced (by someone over 21), it wouldn’t be considered rape, but that’s possibly also why this is a published story.
Who knows if there were others?
I’m disgusted. I hope he gets the book thrown at him, not just for his original crime but for fleeing as well. We cannot tolerate that in a just society.
Esthier on October 1, 2009 at 6:10 PM
But only on dry land, and if they vote Democrat–including their dead.
Liam on October 1, 2009 at 6:11 PM
It’s no surprise that a feminist would say this. What else would you expect from someone dedicated to human sacrifice (abortion) to the gods of liberalism.
RandyChandler on October 1, 2009 at 6:17 PM
Actually, I agree with you, and the fact that this entire fiasco has pulled the Left’s pants down on the public square is far from lost on me. And I feel the same nasty glee that I’m sure you do.
When it comes to the outrages blithely perpetrated by “feminists” and child molesters it gets real personal, and I’m afraid my perspective slips a little bit. Sorry for making it about me, and let’s by all means enjoy the public humiliation of these cretins.
Schadenfreude ranks right up there with envy as the greatest of sins, for me at least, and like Augustine I pray that I stop enjoying it so much – but not yet.
warbaby on October 1, 2009 at 6:18 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »