Nope, never expect any agreement from this blog. AnninCA on September 30, 2009 at 3:11 PM

Are you kidding? Everyone here is in total agreement about you.

thuja on September 30, 2009 at 7:06 PM

Sure, like a ball of yarn taunting a cat. The yard ain’t having half the fun the cat is.

Substance is great. Keep your eye on the substance. Skip the yarn-swatting stuff.

As it is now, AnninCA is enjoying taunting you. And you are attracting your karma by responding to her in childish ways.

thuja on September 30, 2009 at 7:06 PM

Karma? Yeah, used to smoke that shit.

it would be unfair to require women to purchase separate insurance coverage for abortion services.

Arrrrrrrghhhhhhhhh!

For Pete’s sake, a freakin’ abortion is cheaper than the insurance policy you would need to purchase to cover it – unless you’re Whoopi and you get a few a year, I guess.

Someone please, wake me the F up! This cannot really be happening.

not O/T – Anti – Healthcare Takeover/Tea Party on the Boston Common on Saturday, 10/17, noon

Usually the best way to get rid of people you don’t like is to ignore them or to sincerely ask them difficult questions. The latter method works, because most people don’t like to have to answer challenging questions. As it is now, AnninCA is enjoying taunting you. And you are attracting your karma by responding to her in childish ways.

Then go elsewhere.

Buh Bye.

Knucklehead on September 30, 2009 at 3:15 PM

Bye!

(Although, I’m not leaving. I guess if I make you this uncomfortable, you are?)

So you admit that you were totally out of touch with reality when you voted for him?

Del Dolemonte on September 30, 2009 at 3:58 PM

No me. I voted for McCain.

rcl on September 30, 2009 at 5:42 PM

Grassley knows what he’s doing–he is not “disilllusioned”–he knows the game they are playing. I call his office about every week. He is my Senator. Some Democrats now wonder whether Grassley had been toying with them – and particularly his good friend Baucus – from the start. One joked that Baucus needs to see the movie He’s Just Not That into You.
“The simple truth is that I am and always have been opposed to the Obama Administration’s plans to nationalize health care,” Grassley wrote. “Period.” Grassley’s late-August campaign fundraising letter.

He is one of the few people still arguing that a grand bipartisan deal is possible – though he suggests that the way to get there is through a Democratic surrender. “There’s a feeling that the only way to get a bipartisan agreement is to defeat a Democratic proposal on the first hand, and then the Democrats will come to Republican leadership, and then, at that point, they’ll know the only way they’re going to get health-care reform is bipartisan,” he recently told Iowa reporters.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20090903/us_time/08599192020900

So cost will not be lower even if Taxpayers will need to foot the bill of Illegal Aliens and someone is too lazy to use birth control? LMAO

LIAR

I’m throwing a party when Ann finally leaves us for good! Who wants to come?

AsianGirlInTights on September 30, 2009 at 2:52 PM

I’m in. I’ll bring some Foster’s.

BTW, jimbo, we aren’t picking on Ann. We’re just tired of being shat on by her, post upon post, ad nauseum, with her self-righteous, emotional, sanctimonious bullsh!t.

She has written the odd post where she didn’t lecture everyone else, but those times are very few and far in between.

If she could mount a logical argument, we’d be all for it, even if we disagreed. But she doesn’t. So here we are, ready for the departure party.

-Wanderlust

I’ll bring some Puser’s British Navy Rum if Ann in the Can gets canned, along the Canadian MP Avid Drywall.

Afterward, it was Grassley’s turn for disillusionment:

Disillusionment my ass! These feckless jerks have made a career out of their Capt. Renault moments.

Let’s please get rid of Chuck & Orrin any way possible.

TXUS on September 30, 2009 at 4:45 PM

Heh :p

Just let me know, and I willbring those weenie thingees….

lovingmyUSA on September 30, 2009 at 4:38 PM

Well, last I checked, I’ll probably be able to cover part of that, too…

…he said, slapping his own bad boy hand. -_*

TXUS on September 30, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Just let me know, and I willbring those weenie thingees….

sherryande on September 30, 2009 at 3:38 PM

Gotta admit, I missed that one–*shudders…

I really don’t think Rush wants to do that. For a lot of reasons.

Maybe she should run herself, she seemed to know just exactly what she did and did not want.

The key element is
distancing the Catholic
HMO from the direct
provision of or payment for
forbidden services. In some
cases, the Catholic HMO
will contract with non-
Catholic providers to
administer the services it
cannot provide.

For instance, a CFFC study
in 2000 found that Seton
Health Plan in Texas
provided contraception to its
Medicaid clients through
Planned Parenthood.

Catholic HMOs can also
arrange for the portion of
the premiums they receive
that would pay for
reproductive health services
to go though third-party
administrators so that the
HMO is not directly paying
for reproductive health
services.

Finally, a Catholic
HMO can arrange for
another insurer to handle
payment for and the
provision of reproductive
health services. Many
Catholic plans which
participate in the Medicaid
program utilize this
arrangement

There was probably a time in my life when looks overcame comfort but they are long gone. Except for really really tall heels.

Cindy Munford on September 30, 2009 at 3:30 PM

mmm mmmm mmmmm.

P.S. Saw where you might temporarily be AWOL from us. Come back soon. Always enjoy your thoughts.