Obama fudges another health-care horror story

posted at 10:12 am on September 29, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Does anyone get the feeling that Barack Obama would have made a great summer-camp cabin mate?  Especially around the campfire, as kids began telling ghost stories to scare everyone else, Obama would probably have told the most outrageous and frightening stories — simply by embellishing stories he heard from other people.  As President, he has shown himself adept at this practice, having wildly embellished two health-care horror stories in the past month to frighten people into backing ObamaCare:

One of President Barack Obama’s health care “horror stories” is about a woman who, he says, lost her health insurance on the verge of breast cancer surgery because she didn’t disclose a case of acne to the insurer. That’s not what happened.

Robin Lynn Beaton, 59, of Waxahachie, Texas, indeed had her insurance suspended and then terminated when she needed it the most. Hers is a cautionary tale about how an insurance company can act in a seemingly arbitrary manner to revoke coverage for lifesaving treatment.

But not for the reasons Obama cites.

She “was about to get a double mastectomy when her insurance company canceled her policy because she forgot to declare a case of acne,” he said in one telling.

Beaton did not lose her insurance because she failed to own up to a skin problem in her past. She lost it because, when enrolling in the plan, she had not reported a previous heart condition and did not list her weight accurately.

As the Associated Press reports, the surgery she needed had nothing to do with a heart condition.  However, hiding a pre-existing heart condition from an insurer is much more significant than an acne condition.  Obama tells the story as if the insurer acted irrationally, when in fact the woman hid important information in order to obtain the insurance in the first place.

She didn’t miss the surgery, either, but not because of the beneficence of the insurer.  She contacted Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX), who demanded that the insurance company reinstate her policy, especially since the breast cancer had nothing to do with the prior heart condition.  After a few days, in which Barton made clear that he would make Beaton’s case a national cause, the insurer reinstated Beaton and she had her surgery ten weeks later.

President Obama warned people not to spread myths about health care and insurance, but he seems to be the Mythmaker in Chief these days.  Maybe he should stop retelling tall tales and start governing his own tongue before instructing anyone else on governing theirs.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Liar liar, mom’s pants on fire.

Dhuka on September 29, 2009 at 10:15 AM

“You lie, again”

the_nile on September 29, 2009 at 10:16 AM

She contacted Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX), who demanded that the insurance company reinstate her policy, especially since the breast cancer had nothing to do with the prior heart condition. After a few days, in which Barton made clear that he would make Beaton’s case a national cause, the insurer reinstated Beaton and she had her surgery ten weeks later.

Barton apparently didn’t get the message that a representative is supposed to avoid constituents.

Vashta.Nerada on September 29, 2009 at 10:17 AM

The facts are mere trivialities to be downplayed and spun by this Admin when they don’t fit the template.

The ends justify these types of memes…………

JoeinTX on September 29, 2009 at 10:17 AM

Once you have master embleishing your own past to become President, everything else is easy.

WashJeff on September 29, 2009 at 10:17 AM

He’s just trying to make lying cool.

Monica on September 29, 2009 at 10:18 AM

Does anyone get the feeling that Barack Obama would have made a great summer-camp cabin mate?

I have no doubt that he and Hugo went to the same “Summer camp”.

elduende on September 29, 2009 at 10:18 AM

At least the media is providing the fact-checking and calling him out accordingly….. /sarc

search4truth on September 29, 2009 at 10:19 AM

Who gets acne when they’re 59?

BigD on September 29, 2009 at 10:19 AM

Maybe he should stop retelling tall tales and start governing his own tongue before instructing anyone else on governing theirs.

oboobi is a firm believer in, do as i say not as i do…

SHARPTOOTH on September 29, 2009 at 10:20 AM

Does he have any true stories? Really, it seems that every tale of woe he’s put forward is a lie. Did I miss an anecdote that wasn’t a lie?

Pablo on September 29, 2009 at 10:22 AM

After a few days, in which Barton made clear that he would make Beaton’s case a national cause, the insurer reinstated Beaton and she had her surgery ten weeks later.

Is this a good thing?

This seems like a form of black mail. On the assumption that the insurance company followed its rules when the policy was established, I really do not care for a person in power using his\her influence to twist the rules.

WashJeff on September 29, 2009 at 10:22 AM

Obama = CIC = Carbuncle-in-Chief.

ICBM on September 29, 2009 at 10:22 AM

Who gets acne when they’re 59?

BigD on September 29, 2009 at 10:19 AM

Unfortunate people.

sammypants on September 29, 2009 at 10:23 AM

He can’t get over his early job success – selling scary BS to fearful, disadvantaged people as a “community organizer” – in order to rile them up and extract money from the Government/Taxpayers.
Hard to break a habit.

PaddyJ on September 29, 2009 at 10:24 AM

Am I going to have to start replacing Dear Leader with Dear Liar?

rbj on September 29, 2009 at 10:24 AM

So does this mean that both stories he told in that speech were made up?

Joe Caps on September 29, 2009 at 10:24 AM

Chicago 2016!

LibTired on September 29, 2009 at 10:26 AM

The only reason to listen to Barack Obama is to collect a record of his outright lies, his mistatements, his strawmen arguments and his slanders of the previous admininistration and our country in general.

Otherwise, it’s pointless to listen to this guy.

The basic message always remains the same, it’s just the lies that change to keep people interested.

NoDonkey on September 29, 2009 at 10:26 AM

Is this a good thing?

This seems like a form of black mail. On the assumption that the insurance company followed its rules when the policy was established, I really do not care for a person in power using his\her influence to twist the rules.

WashJeff on September 29, 2009 at 10:22 AM

If insurance wasn’t a highly regulated industry, it would be a bad thing.

Vashta.Nerada on September 29, 2009 at 10:27 AM

this is rehashed news

maverick muse on September 29, 2009 at 10:27 AM

Ho Hum. Another day and another lie (or lies) from the most dishonest President we’ve ever been inflicted with.

Webrider on September 29, 2009 at 10:28 AM

Im going to go with the assumption that everything he says is made up.

becki51758 on September 29, 2009 at 10:28 AM

Slightly OT: We need to keep the pressure on!

Montana’s Max Baucus is in a hurry to get the highway robbery of American seniors’ health care benefits over and done with, and so he’s using jam-down tactics in his Senate Finance Committee. Arizona’s Jon Kyl is standing up against the attempt to blow the seizure of $500 billion in seniors’ medical dollars, but Baucus is aiming to shut the process down and jam down the bill this week.

http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/ea694068-a561-4c1b-bd1f-a59d69e5f3c4

There’s a comprehensive list of numbers and emails of those that need to be contacted. Keep the pressure on.

elduende on September 29, 2009 at 10:29 AM

If insurance wasn’t a highly regulated industry, it would be a bad thing.

Vashta.Nerada on September 29, 2009 at 10:27 AM

Because it is highly regulated, it is OK? Is that your point?

Politicians should not interfere in contract disputes, thats what our court system is for.

WashJeff on September 29, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Most cases of people having their health insurance dropped is because of them lying on the applications about preexisting conditions.

The new legislation is supposed to make it illegal to drop people because of preexisting conditions.

Does this mean we will all be able to lie about preexisting conditions to keep our premiums low and not have to worry about repurcussions when the health insurance company discovers the preexisting conditions?

Joe Caps on September 29, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Related parody: “Obama Credits Handful of Green Eyeshades with His Decision to Radically Reinvent Entire Health Care System” http://optoons.blogspot.com/2009/09/obama-credits-handful-of-green.html

Mervis Winter on September 29, 2009 at 10:33 AM

Weight is an automatic decline for self pay policies if someone exceeds a weight limit. When I was out in California, Kaiser was not writing policies for anyone who was 5 feet 5 inches tall who weight more than 180 pounds. That leaves out half of the population. It was an issue for me. I had to hire an employee and create a group before I could get coverage. When you consider the salary of my admin assistant, on top of the insurance premium, my monthly cost was quite high. I really didn’t need an assistant, but it got me insurance at the time.

There are issues with this whole system, but I still do not advocate nuking what we have now and replacing it with a multi trillion dollar government run program.

We need some easy fixes:

1) Allow people who can’t get private coverage like my situation out in CA to buy into whatever policies Congress has. That would work :)

2) ALlow people to get policies across the state lines so someone could purchase insurance from a astate that has not put in all of these mandates that most people don’t want or need.

3) TORT REFORM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

karenhasfreedom on September 29, 2009 at 10:35 AM

The only reason to listen to Barack Obama is to collect a record of his outright lies, his mistatements, his strawmen arguments and his slanders of the previous admininistration and our country in general.

NoDonkey on September 29, 2009 at 10:26 AM

It would be far easier and more efficient to make a record of the very few times he utters a truth.

TXUS on September 29, 2009 at 10:35 AM

Remember how liberals get all bent out of shape when we jokingly call Obama The Messiah? Well, how do they explain this?

mizflame98 on September 29, 2009 at 10:35 AM

MORE COWBELL!!!

percysunshine on September 29, 2009 at 10:36 AM

Too bad the MSM isn’t exposing all of Obama’s little white lies.

Will everyday Americans, who are too busy to bother with actual research on the issues, actually be aware of what Obama has said that is not truthful?

texasconserv on September 29, 2009 at 10:36 AM

Politicians should not interfere in contract disputes, thats what our court system is for.

WashJeff on September 29, 2009 at 10:32 AM

I agree with you, but I think that politicians should not be involved with health care or insurance at all. It is none of their business, or wasn’t, until they started regulating it. They also regulate baseball, which is none of their business, but it means that they can impact the game. My point is that congress shouldn’t be involved in health care at all, but since they are, they might as well be responsive to their constituents on specific issues.

Vashta.Nerada on September 29, 2009 at 10:40 AM

Has he broke Clinton’s record yet as “The Most Lying President Ever”?

I think he’s already broken the record for “The Most Blatant and Ridiculous Lies Ever Told by a President”. And he did it in less than eight months! It took Clinton nearly 8 years to set that record.

Rod on September 29, 2009 at 10:40 AM

From now on, we can no longer call out Obama on his lies.

The new decorum is *cough*bullshit*cough*.

PappaMac on September 29, 2009 at 10:42 AM

Acne-cardiac, Maya-Malia, Insurance reform-socialism come on now folks, what’s the big difference, you get my point and that is….

I Won.

ted c on September 29, 2009 at 10:42 AM

Is this post about a mistake (willful or not) that Obama made, or about health insurance?

The lesson of the story is still the same, as the article notes:

Hers is a cautionary tale about how an insurance company can act in a seemingly arbitrary manner to revoke coverage for lifesaving treatment.

Does anyone here deny that conclusion? If you heard this about an insurance company, wouldn’t you be much less likely to do business with them (not that you really have a choice as an individual in most cases)?

tneloms on September 29, 2009 at 10:44 AM

Obama tells the story as if the insurer acted irrationally, when in fact the woman hid important information in order to obtain the insurance in the first place.

Barry tells stories as if Americans are irrational enough to believe any lie he tells, and will never check up on the accuracy of his statements

That’s because Barry is a pampered intellectual elitist who is used to having his lies believed by his elite supporters in Congress, academia and the MSM.

Loxodonta on September 29, 2009 at 10:44 AM

Is this a good thing?

This seems like a form of black mail. On the assumption that the insurance company followed its rules when the policy was established, I really do not care for a person in power using his\her influence to twist the rules.

WashJeff on September 29, 2009 at 10:22 AM

Yeah, it’s a good thing. Corporations do lots of stupid things that may be consistent with their policies and the law, but would give them a reputational beating if made public. Insurance fraud is common, but insurance companies use that as an excuse to go on fishing expeditions into people’s initial applications in order to deny them coverage later on. While they are legally entitled to do that, they are stupid for doing it in this politically charged environment. I have no problem with an elected official reminding them of that. Better to have a Congressman convince a company to give up dumb and abusive practices than the entire Congress vote for a legislative solution that will shut down the entire industry.

It’s similar to the mortgage lenders voluntarily giving up 2-year ARMs when the heat was put on them by Congress about many of those loans being abusive. Sure, a few of them weren’t and people did actually choose them, but they weren’t necessary and the reputational cost to the industry far exceeded the few dollars in profits made on those loans.

rockmom on September 29, 2009 at 10:47 AM

People need to write the White House with these corrections everytime Obama does this sort of thing. The adminstration seems to cling to the idea we are like a bunch of college kids who will believe what ever Prof. Obama spews out. Then then ignore evidence presenting the truth to them. If they were inundated with emails to the contrary, just maybe they would pay attention before it is too late.

Zelsdorf Ragshaft on September 29, 2009 at 10:50 AM

Well, how do they explain this?

mizflame98 on September 29, 2009 at 10:35 AM

I just heard that on Beck’s radio show, creepy.

thomasaur on September 29, 2009 at 10:51 AM

My point is that congress shouldn’t be involved in health care at all, but since they are, they might as well be responsive to their constituents on specific issues.

Vashta.Nerada on September 29, 2009 at 10:40 AM

From a purely political standpoint, Barton probably had to intervene. The danger with your final statement is that congress forces its regulations on companies that do not want them. They are uninvited guests that quickly set the terms of the party.

WashJeff on September 29, 2009 at 10:51 AM

Liar is such a strong word. Perhaps “factually challenged”?

Hog Wild on September 29, 2009 at 10:53 AM

Obama may be the biggest douchebag in the universe.

cadams on September 29, 2009 at 10:54 AM

Does this mean we will all be able to lie about preexisting conditions to keep our premiums low and not have to worry about repurcussions when the health insurance company discovers the preexisting conditions?

Joe Caps on September 29, 2009 at 10:32 AM

That’s an interesting point. If insurers can’t drop your coverage when they find out you deliberately lied on your application (about being 200 pounds overweight, or having chronic heart problems, or being diabetic, or having been previously diagnosed with MS, or ALS, or cancer, or some other expensive-to-treat illness), then won’t everybody (except for the young, fit and healthy, perfect-weight crowd) have a strong incentive to lie?

AZCoyote on September 29, 2009 at 10:57 AM

Joe Wilson hit the nail on the head!

ohiobabe on September 29, 2009 at 10:57 AM

His presidential evaluation report this year is going to read: “Makes frequent mischaracterization of facts and events that require subsequent recalibration.”

ted c on September 29, 2009 at 10:58 AM

President Obama warned people not to spread myths about health care and insurance, but he seems to be the Mythmaker in Chief these days. Maybe he should stop retelling tall tales and start governing his own tongue before instructing anyone else on governing theirs.

It’s standard practice. Accuse the other side of doing exactly what you HAVE ALWAYS BEEN DOING!!!

Blacksmith8 on September 29, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Not to nitpick, but I think a surgeon about to perform an operation as involved as a double masectomy, and the oncologist prescribing chemotherapy and/or radiation afterwards would REALLY REALLY want to know about that heart condition and her accurate weight before doing the procedures invovled, since both can impact on several decisions made in the OR and afterwards regarding medication, anesthesia choices, etc.

DrAllecon on September 29, 2009 at 11:00 AM

Ed,

Not enough info here. If a Republican legislator from Texas thinks something is wrong here, then I can’t fault Obama for thinking likewise.

We don’t know whether the patient knew about the heart condition, or how many years the coverage was in place without the heart condition mattering — until the operation was needed. It sure would be nice to know these things before calling Obama a liar.

And, as you point out, it was not beneficence that did it — it was potential bad publicity. If you think you are right, then bad publicity doesn’t matter, but if you think you aren’t, it indeed matters.

Your stature is diminished when you do this kind of half-baked reporting. The best stories are the ones where the blogger presents all the damning facts.

unclesmrgol on September 29, 2009 at 11:00 AM

If he’s lying to our faces and the faces of the world (I closed Gitmo) in his G-12 or UN or whichever speech, what is he doing behind closed doors with Russia, Venezuela, Iran, France, Germany, his on the ground Commanders, Big Pharma, Big Insurance, AARP, AMA, and the Blue Dog Democrats.

This Usurper cannot be trusted by ANYONE! HELLO!

dhunter on September 29, 2009 at 11:08 AM

Barry tells stories as if Americans are irrational enough to believe any lie he tells
////
You’re right there!He assumes we are all uninformed,like his voters.

ohiobabe on September 29, 2009 at 11:08 AM

Insurance companies should be held to the same standards as vets applying for service related illnesses, show the nexus. If A isn’t related to or causes B you can’t be dropped.

Tom

marinetbryant on September 29, 2009 at 11:09 AM

Who gets acne when they’re 59?

BigD on September 29, 2009 at 10:19 AM

No one said she had acne at age 59.

When you apply for an insurance policy you are asked to list — in detail — any and all past medical visits, treatments, outcomes and medications taken. In some instances there is a specified time limit such as “within the last ten years”. Near the end of the application is a statement to the effect that you have disclosed everything and that failure by you to have done so may lead to the policy being revoked.

The cancellation because she “failed to disclose being treated for acne” statement was ridiculous on its face and I said so as soon as Obama made it. Now that other, more serious medical conditions that she failed to mention have surfaced it appears likely that these set off alarms by her insurer, not an acne treatment. That Mr. Mendacity elected to use a lesser oversight to generate more shock value about heartless insurers just goes to show how low he’ll stoop.

ya2daup on September 29, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Why didn’t Dr Zero tell her to take a fookin blue pill and be done with it? You know how these Doctors like to ramrod surgery on unwitting souls.

iam7545 on September 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM

marinetbryant on September 29, 2009 at 11:09 AM

Everyone else pays higher premiums because some are willing to lie on an insurance app and get away with it.
Those who don’t get away with it are furious.
Either way favors Socialization, (someone else paying more because the liar is not willing to).

dhunter on September 29, 2009 at 11:16 AM

President Obama warned people not to spread myths about health care and insurance, but he seems to be the Mythmaker in Chief these days. Maybe he should stop retelling tall tales and start governing his own tongue before instructing anyone else on governing theirs.

It has to fit the narrative, Ed, and if it doesn’t fit the narrative, you make it fit the narrative.

Bob's Kid on September 29, 2009 at 11:21 AM

Obie gives the true prevaricators a bad name.

rjoco1 on September 29, 2009 at 11:22 AM

“Liar-in-Chief” says it all.

marklmail on September 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM

It’s standard practice. Accuse the other side of doing exactly what you HAVE ALWAYS BEEN DOING!!!

Blacksmith8 on September 29, 2009 at 10:59 AM
////
Yup,and when you call them on it,you’re a RACIST!

ohiobabe on September 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM

If somehow all “progressives” were forced to tell the truth, they would be run out of the country in tar and feathers.

Christian Conservative on September 29, 2009 at 11:35 AM

Funny how a REPUBLICAN Congressman was willing to go to bat for a woman unjustly denied coverage against the EEEEEEVIL insurance companies. Who’d a thunk it?

Insurance companies can and do make mistakes, and sometimes unjustly deny coverage. In this particular case, the Government (in the person of Rep. Barton) defended Ms. Beaton against the insurance company, which caved because it didn’t want its name besmirched on national TV (in competition with other insurance companies) over one denied claim.

But what if the Government WAS the only health insurance company in the country? Would anyone then defend patients against abuses of denial of coverage?

Steve Z on September 29, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Facts are just little inconveniences.

Schadenfreude on September 29, 2009 at 12:04 PM

If you think you are right, then bad publicity doesn’t matter

You are joking, right? Ask the Duke Lacrosse team if bad publicity matters when you’re think you’re right…..Hell, ask George Bush.

xblade on September 29, 2009 at 12:12 PM

when you’re think you’re right

you

xblade on September 29, 2009 at 12:13 PM

When I was out in California, Kaiser was not writing policies for anyone who was 5 feet 5 inches tall who weight more than 180 pounds. That leaves out half of the population. It was an issue for me.

Is Kaiser the only insurer in California?

xblade on September 29, 2009 at 12:15 PM

Hers is a cautionary tale about how an insurance company can act in a seemingly arbitrary manner to revoke coverage for lifesaving treatment.

Does anyone here deny that conclusion?

tneloms on September 29, 2009 at 10:44 AM

Yes, see e.g.:

Joe Caps on September 29, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Premiums are a function of the insured’s state of health. It’s simply a matter of pricing the risk. Understating the risk understates the price (premium) and, in the aggregate, distorts the actuarial soundness of the risk pool. The real cautionary tale should have been, don’t lie on your application.

Barnestormer on September 29, 2009 at 12:18 PM

You know, all Obama’s lying would make more sense if he were actually GOOD at lying. At least Clinton always kept his lies in the gray-maybe area where you couldn’t just look up the facts and discredit him. Obama is such an amateur.

WashingtonsWake on September 29, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Obama decries THE USE OF FEAR TACTICS, except when they suit his ends.

GarandFan on September 29, 2009 at 12:32 PM

Remember how liberals get all bent out of shape when we jokingly call Obama The Messiah? Well, how do they explain this?

mizflame98 on September 29, 2009 at 10:35 AM

My humble opinion…..this link praying to Obama is scarier than anything happening in the world right now!! It is one of the attributes of the antichrist. Our nation should be on its needs praying for salvation and help during this great spiritual warfare taking place. God help us – God save us!!

whatzit2u on September 29, 2009 at 12:38 PM

That sound you don’t hear is the press not doing its job.

drjohn on September 29, 2009 at 12:48 PM

You LIE FUDGE!

hillbillyjim on September 29, 2009 at 12:52 PM

Liar liar, mom’s pants JEANS on fire.

Dhuka on September 29, 2009 at 10:15 AM

FIFY…..

Sponge on September 29, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Makes you wonder if the next myth out there, is that Obama is really a woman! :o

capejasmine on September 29, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Fudges? Is this the political correct term for, He Lied?

BigMike252 on September 29, 2009 at 1:31 PM

Premiums are a function of the insured’s state of health. It’s simply a matter of pricing the risk. Understating the risk understates the price (premium) and, in the aggregate, distorts the actuarial soundness of the risk pool. The real cautionary tale should have been, don’t lie on your application.

Barnestormer on September 29, 2009 at 12:18 PM

I understand that, but the reaction to finding out this lie shouldn’t be to deny life-saving treatment for an unrelated problem. Perhaps it should be to charge the customer for the difference in premiums over the years, though I don’t know if insurance companies can do this. But I would rather not do business with an insurance company does works like this, even though I don’t lie about pre-existing conditions, because I don’t want my insurance company using one excuse to get out of paying for something unrelated.

tneloms on September 29, 2009 at 2:11 PM

The insurance…uh…company…ahh…acted stupidly…

AmericanDad on September 29, 2009 at 3:11 PM

He starts talking
we know hes a liar
He says some more
but he still is a liar
And he yaps yaps yaps
once a liar
always a liar

( thanx Johny Cash, Ring of fire)

macncheez on September 29, 2009 at 3:44 PM

Does a tree falling in the forest make a sound if there is no one there to hear it?
Does the O lie if there is no media willing to talk “Truth to Power?”

chickasaw42 on September 29, 2009 at 4:13 PM

As I have always said…….

HAnthonyWayne on September 29, 2009 at 4:20 PM

The facts are mere trivialities to be downplayed and spun by this Admin when they don’t fit the template.
The ends justify these types of memes…………
JoeinTX on September 29, 2009 at 10:17 AM

Is that why at summer camp they tell the kids Timothy McVeigh was executed for littering?

DSchoen on September 29, 2009 at 6:22 PM

It’s only a lie if you get caught – Ask BJ Clintoon.

TinMan13 on September 29, 2009 at 6:53 PM

What does everyone expect from this pathological liar?
Obama lies, it’s what he does.

nelsonknows on September 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM

Too bad the MSM isn’t exposing all of Obama’s little white lies.

Will everyday Americans, who are too busy to bother with actual research on the issues, actually be aware of what Obama has said that is not truthful?

texasconserv on September 29, 2009 at 10:36 AM

You RACIST..

CrockObama lies, the economy dies. Iran bomb, Israel sold down the river, kids killing other kids in Chicago, unemployment sky high, spending out of control..

Hey everyone, lets go to Denmark to get the 2016 Olympics in Chicago. What a turd.

dthorny on September 30, 2009 at 12:20 AM

CrockObma doesn’t lie, we just hear misstatements. wink, wink. mmm mmm mmm.

Makes you wonder if the next myth out there, is that Obama is really a woman! :o

capejasmine on September 29, 2009 at 1:17 PM

He throws like a girl and wears mom jeans? huuuuuummmmmmm.

dthorny on September 30, 2009 at 12:23 AM