Name ‘em and shame ‘em: More than 100 filmmakers sign petition defending child rapist

posted at 8:16 pm on September 29, 2009 by Allahpundit

Most are European and unfamiliar, but among the people whose movies I’ll never watch again: Jonathan Demme, John Landis, Michael Mann, Martin Scorsese, and, bless his heart, Woody Allen, who I guess was forced to sign lest the press seize on the idea of a guy who married his almost-stepdaughter passing judgment on Polanski. Open question to any of these rape-defending turds: How far would you have let Polanski go before deciding that, hey, he probably should serve some time after all? What if he punched the kid in the face when he was raping her? Beat her with a tire iron? Seriously, how far?

Lest you think that this is about anything other than some perverse droit de seigneur for talented artists, here’s how the petition phrases the signatories’ deep moral objection to arresting this guy:

By their extraterritorial nature, film festivals the world over have always permitted works to be shown and for filmmakers to present them freely and safely, even when certain States opposed this.

The arrest of Roman Polanski in a neutral country, where he assumed he could travel without hindrance, undermines this tradition: it opens the way for actions of which no one can know the effects.

Roman Polanski is a French citizen, a renown and international artist now facing extradition. This extradition, if it takes place, will be heavy in consequences and will take away his freedom.

They’re explicitly calling for film festivals to be treated as de facto international waters, above the laws of any sovereign land and beyond the reach of any cop, even if that cop is in the area looking for … a fugitive who raped a kid. And the beat goes on: Polish filmmakers are calling his arrest a “judicial lynching” and a separate petition organized by a French philosopher objects to this degenerate being pinched like, and I quote, “a common terrorist.” This entire story comes back to that word “common,” doesn’t it?

Even HuffPo’s commenters can’t believe there are people on the site defending Polanski. Keep punching yourself in the eye, Hollywood; the blacker and more bruised it is, the better. Exit fun fact: Which poor, persecuted, misunderstood genius once said this?

“If I had killed somebody, it wouldn’t have had so much appeal to the press, you see? But… f—ing, you see, and the young girls. Judges want to f— young girls. Juries want to f— young girls. Everyone wants to f— young girls!”

Update: A Jesuit priest wonders, what if it were Father Polanski who’d raped a kid? “Entertainment, not religion, is the new opiate of the people and we don’t want our supply disturbed.”


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

DISGRAZIA!!!!!

Gob on September 29, 2009 at 8:17 PM

Uh

I don’t want to f*ck 13 year old girls.

21 year olds? Maybe

30 year olds? Definitely

But uh..
13?

F*cking freak, f*ck you!

blatantblue on September 29, 2009 at 8:17 PM

Shame’Em List,sooooooooooo excellent,let it be said,
so it is written!!

canopfor on September 29, 2009 at 8:18 PM

this stuff makes me sick

people

idk

these people belong back in the time of the Greeks

so they can go penetrate little slave children

bastards

blatantblue on September 29, 2009 at 8:18 PM

Roman Polanski is a French citizen, a renown and international artist

Like I was saying the other day. The Hollywood elite believes they have the right to do things like rape a little girl and get away with it. Because laws are for little people – like you and I.

18-1 on September 29, 2009 at 8:19 PM

Oh, cut ‘em some slack… Remember it wasn’t “rape-rape”.

RightWinged on September 29, 2009 at 8:19 PM

NO.

NOT MANN AND SCORSESE.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!

MadisonConservative on September 29, 2009 at 8:20 PM

Oh, cut ‘em some slack… Remember it wasn’t “rape-rape”.

RightWinged on September 29, 2009 at 8:19 PM

i should forward that whole thing to my ex

“I didnt CHEAT cheat on you, blatantblue!!!”

blatantblue on September 29, 2009 at 8:20 PM

Terry Gilliam and Buck Henry, too.

Disgusting.

Meryl Yourish on September 29, 2009 at 8:21 PM

its amazing how people adore a child rapist

then again

they also adore “freedom fighters”

cop killuhz

etc

so should we be surprised?

blatantblue on September 29, 2009 at 8:21 PM

Beyond belief.

brak on September 29, 2009 at 8:21 PM

A commenter over there said Polanski said in an interview with Martin Amis that everybody wants to screw little girls and asked why was everyone picking on him.

We need to find that interview.

Blake on September 29, 2009 at 8:22 PM

Monica Bellucci?

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

/KAAAAAHN!!

CurtZHP on September 29, 2009 at 8:22 PM

Its is the year 2009,

and according to Whoopee,

Its the way we see things,

er,

the way Liberals see things!
(sarc).

canopfor on September 29, 2009 at 8:22 PM

Everyone wants to f— young girls!”

Translation (for me): “She wasn’t the first or last girl I f—-ed.”

He needs to go to prison for the rest of his life.

SteveMG on September 29, 2009 at 8:22 PM

progressive = pagan degeneracy

Ris4victory on September 29, 2009 at 8:23 PM

Lacking an internal form of morality and self-control that can only come from one source…

never mind.

ted c on September 29, 2009 at 8:23 PM

These creepy, pretentious gits are fools.

Just because Polanski made great films (“Rosemary’s Baby”, “Bitter Moon”, “Tess”) does NOT mean that one has to support the pervert! He’s a disgrace as a man and has disgusting (lack of) character!

I’d be ashamed of myself to barrack (an Australian slang to “root”) for an unrepentant pervert!!

Gob on September 29, 2009 at 8:23 PM

We need to find that interview.

AP has it at the end of his post.

SteveMG on September 29, 2009 at 8:23 PM

An excellent post, AP. Thank you!

Perverts must face the light of truth and, hopefully, justice.

NebCon on September 29, 2009 at 8:24 PM

sick.

libertylady on September 29, 2009 at 8:24 PM

sick

honestly
im waiting to walk on campus one of these days and see a

Free Polanski! shirt

blatantblue on September 29, 2009 at 8:24 PM

Oops! Looks like you found it already.

I believe Harrison Ford also is supporting Polanski.

Blake on September 29, 2009 at 8:25 PM

21 year olds? Maybe

Uhhhhh…. maybe? DEFINITELY. He didn’t say “date” them, just “f–” them.

p0s3r on September 29, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Scorsese..that sucks. I used to respect him.

These people are insane and defending a monster.

BakerAllie on September 29, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Who gives a damn about what 100 filmmakers sign? I generally watch movies now of the classic nature. I rarely if ever go to a theater anymore.

d1carter on September 29, 2009 at 8:26 PM

I think allah is right about Woody Allen, he’s a bit in a hard spot himself to pass judgement…well, he should have refrained from signing or saying anything, or making any comment at all…but then I am sure some dimwit lefty journalist would have looked for the opportunity to ask him precisely that question…so I guess he anticipated a little and signed the petition so they they leave him alone …

jimver on September 29, 2009 at 8:26 PM

I had linked earlier to a NY Times pieces where it appears that the majority of French opinion is against Polanski and for his extradition: Polanski.

Revolt of the masses vs. the revolting elites.

SteveMG on September 29, 2009 at 8:26 PM

You can bet I’ll never watch a film from these jerks who support child rapists.

cubachi on September 29, 2009 at 8:27 PM

I’m sure Joycelyn Elders is on the list,crap,
I mean,She should be on that list,after all,
Joyceln did want to teach kindergartens,
the art of self-service,ahem!!

canopfor on September 29, 2009 at 8:27 PM

NO.

NOT MANN AND SCORSESE.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!

MadisonConservative on September 29, 2009 at 8:20 PM

Dude, exact same reaction here. Too many good movies between the two of them.

Codec717 on September 29, 2009 at 8:27 PM

This is where lefty thought leads…there is no bottom at all for these people…they always find a way to sink further and further down.

AUINSC on September 29, 2009 at 8:29 PM

And still no call to Boycott Hollywood?

ronsfi on September 29, 2009 at 8:29 PM

Martin Scorsese? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

ronsfi on September 29, 2009 at 8:30 PM

Oops! Looks like you found it already.

I believe Harrison Ford also is supporting Polanski.

Blake on September 29, 2009 at 8:25 PM

Polanski directed him in Frantic if I’m not mistaken.

Damn, what the hell is Michael Mann doing?! I had so much respect for that dude as a filmmaker. John Landis indirectly caused the beheading of one of his actors, so he’s messed up in the head anyway. Martin Scorsese? Maybe he’s back on the coke.

Doughboy on September 29, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Michael Medved spent an entire hour of his show explaining to his audience that all should be forgotten based on he’s old and it will be expensive.

Disgusting.

We can forget when rapists everywhere get the chair.

mattshu on September 29, 2009 at 8:31 PM

The way I see it, these signers are announcing that their artistic creations are now free for the public to aquire, use, and disseminate at will.

Dusty on September 29, 2009 at 8:32 PM

its amazing – I am convinced that a liberal is completely incapable of what I and many other people call “judgement call”

kerry’s vietnam service was the same as mccain’s for instance

seaniep on September 29, 2009 at 8:33 PM

No Whoopi Goldberg? It wasn’t rape-rape after all.

SouthernGent on September 29, 2009 at 8:33 PM

As Ace pointed out, she was 5 years under the age of consent and he knew that full-well since he had already gotten release forms signed by her mom for the nude photographs.

What. A. Pig.

Y-not on September 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM

The way I see it, these signers are announcing that their artistic creations are now free for the public to aquire, use, and disseminate at will.

Dusty on September 29, 2009 at 8:32 PM

Hit em where it hurts.

javamartini on September 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM

Roman Polanski is a French citizen, a renown and international artist now facing extradition. This extradition, if it takes place, will be heavy in consequences and will take away his freedom.

It would appear that their morals, ethics, sense of shame and their grammar are all about on the same level…shouldn’t that read “renowned”?

Incidentally, is the last line an argument or a statement of fact? Of course it will take away his freedom. That’s the point, idiots.

Blaise on September 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM

This entire story comes back to that word “common,” doesn’t it?

Only little people do jail time.

calbear on September 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM

All these Hollywood types and celebrities that are outraged over Polanski’s arrest are just afraid that this will set a precedent where they are actually held accountable for their actions from now on and that some of their past indiscretions may come back to bite them in the ass.

For far to long celebrities because of their fame and wealth have been able to dodge the legal ramifications of criminal behaviour that would land a regular person in prison and I think Polanski’s arrest may be a sign that the Celebrity get out of jail free card may have just been revoked.

Hellrider on September 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM

There must be politicians all over the country who want to avoid this injustice being served on poor Roman.
I say there should be a petition for politicians to sign.
Oh please! Let some politicians, besides Barney Frank, sign this.

Rocks on September 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM

Uhm, err…not that I would erm, promote that or anything.

javamartini on September 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM

Martin Scorsese? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

ronsfi on September 29, 2009 at 8:30 PM

ronsfi: Ugh! I can’t believe Scorsese,

well,John Edwards is right,there IS TWO AMERICAS!!:)

canopfor on September 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM

they are above such things.

rob verdi on September 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM

I didn’t recognize the majority of those names. I searched, looking for the usual suspects: Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins, Danny Glover, etc…. and instead, I get Abderrahmane Sissako, Alain Terzian, Ettore Scola. It makes it a lot easier to boycott these “artists”.

yogi41 on September 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM

21 year olds? Maybe
Uhhhhh…. maybe? DEFINITELY. He didn’t say “date” them, just “f–” them.

p0s3r on September 29, 2009 at 8:26 PM

While they say ,”no”.

exception on September 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM

So…read any good books lately?

ronsfi on September 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM

Medved? Seriously?

I’m all for posting the audio of that, and making sure his advertisers hear about it.

see-dubya on September 29, 2009 at 8:36 PM

Martin Scorsese? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

ronsfi on September 29, 2009 at 8:30 PM

Are you kidding me? He probably supplied the Qualudes.

Rocks on September 29, 2009 at 8:36 PM

Well,two can tango this one,its time again for a
good old fashion boycott of all the names on the list!!

canopfor on September 29, 2009 at 8:37 PM

mattshu on September 29, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Wow Matt. Medved has been going so soft as of late. I guess I am not sorry I don’t listen to him anymore. I’m not missing much!

Well, let me plug “Quinn & Rose”, “Monica Crowley”, “Rusty Humphries”, “Bauer & Rose”, “Mike Church” and “Andrew Wilkow” to give others GREAT alternatives.

Gob on September 29, 2009 at 8:37 PM

Tilda Swinton. Sh*te.

So what if all the child rapists start fleeing the jurisdictions? Are we supposed to forget about it because it’s been awhile? How people can actually present a defense for this “petition” is beyond me.

fireweednectar on September 29, 2009 at 8:37 PM

Bring back the BLACK LIST!

FloridaBill on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM

Chronological age is relevant to what is legal,not what is biologically and psychologically normal. In some states the age of consent is 14 and in others as high as 18. So if you’re bumping uglies with a teenager it could be legal in one state and in another state a felony that gets you on the sex offender list for life.

If a female has already gone through puberty it is 100% normal for an adult male to find her sexually attractive, regardless of her age. It may be socially unacceptable or even illegal in some jurisdictions to act on that attraction, but the attraction itself is normal. It goes to the definition of puberty. People who have gone through puberty are sexually mature. It’s normal to find sexually mature females to be attractive.

Like that old saying goes, if she’s old enough to bleed, she’s old enough to breed. Consensually, of course. That’s certainly how humans mated before the invention of “adolescence”.

AP, so you don’t think that hot 16 year olds are hot?

The honest males here will admit that at least once in their lives they’ve noticed a very attractive female only to be shocked to find out how young she really was.

rokemronnie on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM

Just another example of the “elite” being above the law. Screw every single one of them.

Let’s have a list of how many would let their 13 yr old daughter “sit” for photographs, unsupervised, with Uncle Roman.

GarandFan on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM

if i did my math right, he was 44 when he raped the 13 year old? Anyone, especially anyone with children should be disgusted.

phillypolitics on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM

I, by my authority as Anonymous commenter, hearby place all works by these artists, and future petitioners, in the public domain.

The Burn Convention for the Protection from Literary and Artistic Workers

exception on September 29, 2009 at 8:39 PM

Tilda Swinton…LOL, no shocker, that. She has an open marriage (if it is even legit) and has a young stud shacking up with her too.

Pervs love pervs.

Gob on September 29, 2009 at 8:39 PM

Notice that you will never see a similar list showing those filmmakers who condemn him.

Joe McCarthy would approve.

Bizarro World.

Hello.

Del Dolemonte on September 29, 2009 at 8:39 PM

The Smoking Gun has the transcripts of the 1977 Grand Jury minutes, including the (graphic) testimony of the young girl.

aquaviva on September 29, 2009 at 8:41 PM

The honest males here will admit that at least once in their lives they’ve noticed a very attractive female only to be shocked to find out how young she really was.

rokemronnie on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM

I card. But saying “no” makes that moot.

exception on September 29, 2009 at 8:41 PM

Noticing an attractive girl and actually doing the deed are TWO DIFFERENT things. Duh!

Gob on September 29, 2009 at 8:41 PM

Like that old saying goes, if she’s old enough to bleed, she’s old enough to breed. Consensually, of course. That’s certainly how humans mated before the invention of “adolescence”.

rokemronnie on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM

Ten years old? Yeah, that’s right.
‘If there’s grass on the field, play ball?’
You have out scumbagged yourself.

HornetSting on September 29, 2009 at 8:42 PM

Michael Medved spent an entire hour of his show explaining to his audience that all should be forgotten based on he’s old and it will be expensive.

Disgusting.

mattshu on September 29, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Disgusting is right. I’m shocked. Shame on him. I hate when these tools say that it is a waste of money to prosecute him. Prosecutors are in the business of prosecuting. There are a 1,000 DAs on staff who get paid if they are in trial, in appellate, or doing nothing, so, might as well make them earn their salary.

Sending out the message that you can’t rape kids and get away with it is an invaluable message.

Sending out the message that if you are rich and/or old you can get away with it, is not.

Seriously, screw Medved!

Blake on September 29, 2009 at 8:42 PM

rokemronnie on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM

And your point being? Are you making excuses for this pervert?

Knucklehead on September 29, 2009 at 8:42 PM

The honest males here will admit that at least once in their lives they’ve noticed a very attractive female only to be shocked to find out how young she really was.

rokemronnie on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM

No doubt

and living in an area with many hoochie moms, the daughts look like hoochies too, and ive been shocked to find out that girls that i thought were 18-20 were 16

so i see your point

but at that point
finding out age should eliminate any ideas

because when you realize shes 15 or 16, you should have the maturity to understand that they are not adults.

blatantblue on September 29, 2009 at 8:42 PM

aquaviva on September 29, 2009 at 8:41 PM

They have the transcript of his guilty plea as well, with the letter from the victim’s attorney asking for the plea to be accepted only to protect her.

exception on September 29, 2009 at 8:43 PM

This is where lefty thought leads…there is no bottom at all for these people…they always find a way to sink further and further down.

AUINSC on September 29, 2009 at 8:29 PM

aint that the truth, how deep does the hole go?

NY Conservative on September 29, 2009 at 8:43 PM

This whole episode is painfully depressing. I need an ice cream.

ronsfi on September 29, 2009 at 8:44 PM

I’ve often wondered how low the Libs will go. Now we know. Way too many of them consider raping children within the bounds of being OK. There doesn’t seem to be any depravity that they will not support if you are one of “them”. There is no law that is not to be scorned by them. Hence the President trying to out wit the Constitution is no big deal.

BetseyRoss on September 29, 2009 at 8:44 PM

rokemronnie on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM

You have out scumbagged yourself.

HornetSting on September 29, 2009 at 8:42 PM

Agreed.

Blake on September 29, 2009 at 8:44 PM

Honestly, is anyone really surprised that Hollywood and intellectual illuminati, aka the you-create-your-own-moral-reality-people—are supporting Polaski here? This is classic moral relativism verses principled right-and-wrongism. And never the twain shall meet. If anything the chasm only grows wider and deeper.

Webutante on September 29, 2009 at 8:45 PM

This is very dangerous petition. Pedifiles the world over are vindicated.

Who will defend the little children?

TN Mom on September 29, 2009 at 8:45 PM

blatantblue on September 29, 2009 at 8:42 PM

I don’t think you need to worry about this, BB. You’re only criteria is that you don’t want to call the ambulance when you break a hip.

HornetSting on September 29, 2009 at 8:45 PM

Michael Medved spent an entire hour of his show explaining to his audience that all should be forgotten based on he’s old and it will be expensive.

Disgusting.

mattshu on September 29, 2009 at 8:31 PM

I said eff you to medved when he bent over for the mccain train.

HornetSting on September 29, 2009 at 8:45 PM

Michael Medved spent an entire hour of his show explaining to his audience that all should be forgotten based on he’s old and it will be expensive.

mattshu on September 29, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Shocker coming from a former movie critic. I won’t forget that. Never cared much for him to begin with, now I find him utterly repulsive.

MadisonConservative on September 29, 2009 at 8:45 PM

No offense, but I’m going to wait to hear the audio of Medved before I write off to his advertisers screaming for his ouster. Because that’s a big deal and we owe him that much.

see-dubya on September 29, 2009 at 8:45 PM

Monica Bellucci played the victim in the most graphic rape scene ever filmed in the movie Irreversible. How she could sign this petition is staggering.

SnarkVader on September 29, 2009 at 8:46 PM

HornetSting on September 29, 2009 at 8:45 PM

Lately it’s 30+ or bust

blatantblue on September 29, 2009 at 8:46 PM

The honest males here will admit that at least once in their lives they’ve noticed a very attractive female only to be shocked to find out how young she really was.

rokemronnie on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM

Probably but only the dishonest ones drug and rape them.

Rocks on September 29, 2009 at 8:46 PM

If the girl he raped was black, oh my . . . Hollywood wouldn’t touch him with a ten foot pole.

keep the change on September 29, 2009 at 8:46 PM

Is this a precursor do demanding equal rights and protection under the law? If it’s okay for Polanski…

obladioblada on September 29, 2009 at 8:46 PM

Don’t you wonder how many times Polanski did this sort of thing and got away with it?

Labamigo on September 29, 2009 at 8:46 PM

I’m waiting to hear the argument asserted that those who signed this petition don’t understand it and that by signing it in no way means they agree with its “Leave Polanski Alone!” sentiment once the signators begin to take heat for placing their names there.

Sharr on September 29, 2009 at 8:47 PM

If a female has already gone through puberty it is 100% normal for an adult male to find her sexually attractive, regardless of her age.

rokemronnie on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM

You’re absolutely right…if we’re talking about a teenage male.

If you’re talking about a man in his mid-forties, you need to beaten into sensibility, slimebag.

MadisonConservative on September 29, 2009 at 8:48 PM

Darren Aronofsky :-(

Just in time. I was going to buy The Wrestler dvd.

Caper29 on September 29, 2009 at 8:48 PM

Par for the course in Hollyweird entertainment industry

larvcom on September 29, 2009 at 8:48 PM

Okay,I just did a quick Intel Mission!

If you want to put faces on the names from
the above article,go to,

http://www.imdb.com/

and put them on zee search,you’ll get the
whole nine yards,on who and what movie!!:)

canopfor on September 29, 2009 at 8:48 PM

Monica Bellucci played the victim in the most graphic rape scene ever filmed in the movie Irreversible. How she could sign this petition is staggering.

SnarkVader on September 29, 2009 at 8:46 PM

That she agreed to be the actress in the most graphic rape scene ever filmed should have told you a lot in the first place.

MadisonConservative on September 29, 2009 at 8:48 PM

Open question to any of these rape-defending turds: How far would you have let Polanski go before deciding that, hey, he probably should serve some time after all?

Like Romie did with the girl he raped: all the way.

Liam on September 29, 2009 at 8:49 PM

Wow Matt. Medved has been going so soft as of late. I guess I am not sorry I don’t listen to him anymore. I’m not missing much!

Well, let me plug “Quinn & Rose”, “Monica Crowley”, “Rusty Humphries”, “Bauer & Rose”, “Mike Church” and “Andrew Wilkow” to give others GREAT alternatives.

I listen to an hour or so per day. The other option during my lunch is Hannity and I tire of his “I love you, Sean, you’re a great American,” and country music blather. Some days Medved’s great, some days he’s awful. The bad days are getting more and more frequent. He’s definitely continuing on with the McCain/centrist love he found during the presidential campaign.

I still listen because he generally has great debates with his guests. I used to tell everyone they should listen to him. But I’m not really a fan anymore.

mattshu on September 29, 2009 at 8:49 PM

Caper29 on September 29, 2009 at 8:48 PM

Tomei looked so good nude in that movie

holy hell

why cant Polanski appreciate a naked adult like i can?

blatantblue on September 29, 2009 at 8:49 PM

rokemronnie on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM

Who gives a shit? The law is that age of consent is 18. An more importantly, he raped her. It was not consensual. Stop trying to hijack the thread.

Blake on September 29, 2009 at 8:49 PM

In some cases I’m sure those who signed the petition would recoil in horror from news of a child rape if it happened today. They are so hung up on their “artistic freedom uber alles” nonsense that they carry it to ridiculous extremes.

Put Joe Sixpack in the story and they’d be all for having him serve his sentence, or would demand worse punishment. But hey, it’s Roman-freekin’-Polanski, creative genius!

They can’t help themselves.

MrScribbler on September 29, 2009 at 8:51 PM

Leftism on parade.

Cicero43 on September 29, 2009 at 8:51 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4