Video: Hannity interviews socialists at the G20. What could go wrong?
posted at 10:11 pm on September 25, 2009 by Allahpundit
The perfect way to heal the rift in the Kirk Cameron thread: Surely the theological contempt we feel for each other is dwarfed by the political contempt we feel for these two imbeciles. On this foundation does the conservative coalition rest, my friends.
Actually, they’re probably atheists, aren’t they? Heart-ache.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Something tells me these two idiots don’t have any skills of relevance to the modern economy, but that they’re self-proclaimed experts in “people-run redistribution of wealth”. All that training I got in b-school about how to actually try creating wealth and these two bimbos think I’m going to just create it so they can redistribute it? F that. I’d rather watch them starve to death, then go back to business as usual.
venividivici on September 25, 2009 at 11:45 PM
That was a train wreck all the way around. Where’s Alan Colmes when you need him?
Pablo on September 25, 2009 at 11:45 PM
Yes, my post above earns the geek of the day award.
Thank you.
SteveMG on September 25, 2009 at 11:45 PM
What a sad endorsement of the Pitt English PhD program. Like, you know, come on.
Jim R. on September 25, 2009 at 11:46 PM
This ignorance is mostly a manifestation of youth. I thought like that too when I was 20. They believe they are thinking clearly, when really they are not thinking at all. Why would anyone need to have more than 44K a year, she asks? Because hun, if that was the limit, there would be no modern society as you know it, and all those “poor ravished by capitalism”, would be dead of malnourishment for we would have the same economic system as the Third World. Financial incentive, be it $4000, $44,000, or 44 billion, is what creates innovation, invention, development, and progress, and by extension, health and freedom for everybody regardless of their own personal wealth. Ironic then, that it is always the “progressives” who never appreciate what it takes to actually progress. They believe they can live in the same prosperous, free and democratic utopia they now enjoy while eliminating the very system that makes it possible.
Only a kid could see the world like that and actually believe it.
keep the change on September 25, 2009 at 11:48 PM
They won’t get their PhDs. That takes work to create a Doctoral Thesis and then defending it before a board. Those girls won’t get far beyond where they are at the moment. It will come as a shock, and they’ll blame ‘the system’.
Liam on September 25, 2009 at 11:48 PM
These two are nothing but mindless myrmidons puking up the same old socialist shyt. That is why liberals like these two need to wear diapers over their mouths
hamradio on September 25, 2009 at 11:51 PM
What a fun bunch of gals those two are. Wouldn’t you like to hang out and have a few drinks while the rant about what horrible place this country is. Yikes.
The idiot on the left doesn’t realize that despite coming from a working class background, she has been able to reach the PhD program at Pitt. If she gets a clue, she will leave academia and make a nice living as a professional, once she realizes that capitalism isn’t so bad. How often in a socialist or communist country would that story be able to occur?
Mallard T. Drake on September 25, 2009 at 11:51 PM
You know who we needed debating these young ladies?
Does anyone remember that attractive economist that Ed and Allah featured several times about a year ago?
Whatever happened to her? I thought she was a sure bet to wind up on Fox News or Fox Business. Sorry, I can’t remember her name. But I suspect that she could have schooled them.
OT: Greta interviewed a local reporter near the school where that creepy video was played. According to the reporter, the principal is claiming that song lyrics got sent home in advance to parents–and the school got no complaints.
Anyone hear anything else?
BuckeyeSam on September 25, 2009 at 11:52 PM
Twenty years from now, if her ‘dream’ came true, she’d be bitching she’s unable to advance.
Kids are idiots, and I can’t take seriously the complaining of 19-year-olds who have daddy paying for their college. I worked for my college credits at low-level job only illegals allegedy work for. And I paid for my car loan that my dad co-signed.
If you’re anti-gun, you haven’t been mugged; if you oppose the death penalty, you have never been raped; if you never worked for the things you own because everyone else paid for it, you’re a liberal.
Liam on September 25, 2009 at 11:58 PM
More would have been gained, by
having a wet T shirt contest.
/
But seriously, Pol Pot lined up the teachers,
the doctors, the educated in close quarters and
used a single bullet. These two would be just
nightly entertainment for Che’s collective.
dopes.
falderal on September 25, 2009 at 11:58 PM
Are you kidding me? Where do you think they got this drivel?
Christian Conservative on September 26, 2009 at 12:00 AM
Twenty years hence, if her ‘dream’ comes true, she’ll whine she’s unable to advance.
Kids are idiots, and I can’t take seriously the complaining of 19-year-olds who have daddy paying for their college. I worked for my credits at low-level jobs only illegals allegedy work for now. I also paid my car loan that my dad co-signed.
If you’re anti-gun, you haven’t been mugged; if you oppose the death penalty, you have never been raped; if you never worked for the things you own because everyone else paid for it, you’re a liberal.
Liam on September 26, 2009 at 12:00 AM
These gals represent the finest in liberal thinking. They believe that through government and social engineering, human nature can be changed towards the good of society. Never has worked, never will. Even these tards, if they had money, wouldn’t give it up unless they were required to by the government. Not many rich liberals pay extra taxes.
Meanwhile, capitalism works because it appeals to human nature. We look out for ourselves first, and then if we choose to, we can look out for others. Capitalism appeals to our natural desire, we don’t need to have our essence altered for the system to work. This is what liberals can’t or won’t accept.
Mallard T. Drake on September 26, 2009 at 12:03 AM
‘Capitalism doesn’t guarantee complete freedom but the absence of it guarantees no freedoms.’SteveMG
that is absolutely correct and that’s why I said Hannity should have brought some nuance in. But then sure he opted for the shorter and simplified version of that. his time with the ladies was limited, I got that :-)
jimver on September 26, 2009 at 12:05 AM
does the term hot air come to mind regarding these 2
Let’s sing KUMBAYA, smoke a joint and watch the rocks fly
robo on September 26, 2009 at 12:09 AM
To truly see a liberal woman, blend Rosanne and Peggy Bundy.
Liam on September 26, 2009 at 12:10 AM
When these girls are 30 – and a bit more experienced in life on this planet – they will be sorry, sorry, sorry that they did this interview!!
Also – they can count a career as a politician out – unless they run in San Francisco of course.
HondaV65 on September 26, 2009 at 12:14 AM
Has ANYONE ever seen Sean Hannity get angry or even raise his voice?
How does he maintain his boorish robot like quality of predictable annoyingness. Does Fox News have Sean Hannity drugged?
Spathi on September 26, 2009 at 12:16 AM
Expect them, too, to marry liberal guys who will ‘disappoint’ them. They’ll be divorced five to seven years after marrying.
They’ll also blame the men for all of it.
Liam on September 26, 2009 at 12:17 AM
It’s the Engish Department.
exception on September 26, 2009 at 12:30 AM
One of the said her parents and uncles earned “like, ten thousand dollars a year” despite working ‘their fingers to the bone’
like, that’s probably what Pitt pays its retardo grad assistants each year
Janos Hunyadi on September 26, 2009 at 12:30 AM
I assume that when the idiot on the left claimed to have a PHD, she meant Pink Haired Daughter.
Ugly on September 26, 2009 at 12:30 AM
LOL!
“MY RELATIVES MAKE $10,000 PER YEAR!”
$10K/yr is $4.80 PER HOUR. Federal minimum wage is way bigger than that.
So either this is some HELLA PART TIME CRAP, or someone needs a second min-wage part time job, or someone is a lying, rich, “I have the time to protest because I’m a liberal and make shit up!” failmonger.
lansing quaker on September 26, 2009 at 12:35 AM
Seriously, we need to get someone on this! Bumper stickers too, make some cash!
ThePrez on September 26, 2009 at 12:39 AM
PhD = Pittsburgh High school Diploma
Caper29 on September 26, 2009 at 12:39 AM
Or a PhD in English Literature………You know, where the big money is.
ThePrez on September 26, 2009 at 12:41 AM
***
Let’s take up a collection and send them to a socialist paradise like Cuba so they can have a 1 year “grand tour” of what fine treatment, lifestyle, and freedom socialism provides.
***
No internet access for peons. Phony money. Limited food. Corncobs and Castro photos for toilet paper. Jutias (big RATS!) for added protein. Let them work with Yoani Sanchez and the brave Cuban bloggers for a while to “expand their horizons” a little. Then return them to the good old U.S.A. on a Cuban inner tube raft like Elian Gonzalez and family used.
***
John Bibb
***
rocketman on September 26, 2009 at 12:47 AM
That girl, with the annoying smirk, on the left is some master of English:
“who have been ravaged by capitalism”
“because we could get the labor for cheaper”
“I’m in a PhD department, um, studying”
Don’t they teach English at the “PhD department” at Pitt? That was just pathetic.
progressoverpeace on September 26, 2009 at 12:57 AM
Well that’s great, honey. So do burglars, robbers, car-jackers, and others of their ilk. Sad that someone can rise so high in the area of academics and never be exposed to a class in basic logic.
oldleprechaun on September 26, 2009 at 12:58 AM
After the hyperinflation 0bama’s monetizing the debt will likely cause, you’ll be lucky if 44k buys you a can of beans.
Rebar on September 26, 2009 at 1:11 AM
SIGH! Sean…Sean…Sean. Why interupt them? They sounded dumb I could have debated them better.
Anyway why Interupt them just let them say something stupid? Also you SHOULD HAVE ANSWERED THEIR questions.
rednebulastudios on September 26, 2009 at 1:17 AM
Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you two shining examples of the public school system.
Oy vey!
csdeven on September 26, 2009 at 1:20 AM
What we are looking at here is a complete failure of the educational system.
I found the rant about capitalism forcing the steel mills out of Pittsburgh, and the US, really showed the lack of understanding she has in matters regulatory and financial. The steel industry was destroyed by two main factors, environmental regulations and labor unions. The combination of these two factors resulted in an uncompetitively priced product. US Steel did not have any desire to be reduced in size at any point in its history.
Clearly, they need a substantial amount of education in the laws of supply and demand.
Another tidbit I found amusing was their lack of understanding between wealth and income. Hannity only asked them about income redistribution leaving the other question of wealth redistribution for another day. I guess he was feeling sorry for them.
Maybe after they leave school they will have a better chance to actually contemplate the basic things in life. ;-)
Freddy on September 26, 2009 at 1:21 AM
Gah, Hannity is little more than a bunch of shopworn slogans at times. He made a couple of good points there but damn, most of us here could have reduced those two socialist dullards into racking sobs within about 2 minutes.
The trouble with Hannity is that he needs to go away a while and do some proper reading. He needs to read some Rand, Mises, Hayek and Hazlitt. He needs to learn a decent repertoire of arguments and absorb the word flow which made those writers so persuasive and successful. Because from where I was sitting he came across as someone whose only saving grace is that he happens to be sitting on the right side of the fence. Let’s see someone who really knows how to debunk socialism, someone who really understands the benefits of the free market and who knows how to articulate them.
He annoyed me during the election campaign for the same reason why he annoyed me during that interview. So many wasted opportunities, so many idiotic points unchallenged by him.
I really think Hannity is under the mistaken impression that jabbing that damn pen at his opponents somehow makes up for the fact that what he’s saying is weak and ineffectual. He needs to put the pen down, keep his hands on the table and concentrate on making better points.
Sharke on September 26, 2009 at 1:21 AM
“Did you miss me, Al?”
“With every bullet so far, Peg!”
Sharke on September 26, 2009 at 1:24 AM
Three Short Points
They seemed brighter than some UC Berkley products I saw on tube recently. A higher rated school…
Why did they believe the government was going to pay for private property breakage during the protests? If anyone did, it would be an evil insurance company or the capitalist landlord or business owner.
Why doesn’t anyone ask these types to explain exactly how the government creates wealth? And how governemnt employees work their fingers to the bone? And did they know that the poor woman who raised The One actually worked as a VP of a Bank?
IlikedAUH2O on September 26, 2009 at 1:34 AM
Norman, please tell us what country has freedom without capitalism?
Freddy on September 26, 2009 at 1:38 AM
That was truly embarrassing, but those were likely Berkeley undergrads, anyway … not from “a PhD department” (LOL). It’s a real shame, because Berkeley is the best school in the world, bar none – both in terms of quality of departments and cost (when I was there, Californians were only paying around $700/semester, and they were complaining about the cost).
These two nitwits don’t even understand that there is a difference between public and private. They are really that stupid.
Questions such as these would be wasted on those ditzes.
Heh. They’d probably come up with some story that she was “working from the inside”, or that she was just forced into it by society.
progressoverpeace on September 26, 2009 at 1:44 AM
Best was when Wingnut #1 started talking about her working-class Pennsylvania grandparents. Wonder what they think of having a pinko commie for a granddaughter?
evergreen on September 26, 2009 at 1:52 AM
I could have written your post as it described what drives me crazy about Sean Hannity. I would have loved to see Rush interview those girls — or even Beck. People can say what they want about Beck, but the man is a reading machine and could have really dug into progressive thinking with those two.
Rapunzel on September 26, 2009 at 1:55 AM
Well, looking on the bright side, at least I got to laugh for 8:55. What a couple of morons…
Dopenstrange on September 26, 2009 at 1:56 AM
This is kind of like that video a couple of weeks ago of the woman making her environmental statement at the Santa Clara City Council meeting. The visuals were the only mitigating factor that made the audio tolerable, since the woman had far more going for her below the neckline than above it.
So just turn down the sound on this one, and stare at the girl on the right’s chest. That’s the most edifying thing about the entire interview.
jon1979 on September 26, 2009 at 1:58 AM
Take away the motivation to create wealth and the result will be a lot less wealth created and thus less for them to redistribute leading to less money for everyone. It’s so obvious, why can’t so many Americans understand this?
Dollayo on September 26, 2009 at 2:01 AM
Wow. Twits soon heading to a classroom near you to train and indoctrinate your children, and teach them a thing or two about life.
SilverStar830 on September 26, 2009 at 2:11 AM
I wish it was just chalked to just being young. This a post from facebook in response to mine. This was the most inane one (guess his age, it’s at the bottom)
The person who wrote this is 45.
JackofNoTrades on September 26, 2009 at 2:14 AM
Private property rights are necessary conditions, though not sufficient, for individual liberties to be able to exist. Our Founders were very keen on this, and it is one of the simplest, yet most powerful, truths. The natural economic system of a society with private property rights is capitalistic. Any other system is ‘unnatural’, and does not work well with individualists, who happen to be the most creative and productive people this Earth has ever seen.
Collectivists don’t care about freedom, since they’re all about group actions and thoughts. And collectivist can never handle growth. It always throws them for a loop and everything breaks down, horribly. Static worlds don’t need private property, since they never make any more than already exists.
progressoverpeace on September 26, 2009 at 2:36 AM
You can see why they’re English Majors… not Computer Science, Mathematics, Engineering, Chemistry, Physics, Pre-Med, or Economics.
C
MrBrowncoat on September 26, 2009 at 2:37 AM
Isn’t that more or less what all liberals think?
jhffmn on September 26, 2009 at 2:48 AM
You can see why they’re English Majors… not Computer Science, Mathematics, Engineering, Chemistry, Physics, Biology, Pre-Med, or Economics.
I’m sure they’ll complete their graduate degrees. They’ll just regurgitate this kind of nonsense to sympathetic professors. Pass with honors I bet. Kinda makes me sick.
I spent months on my Information Systems Masters project. 8-10 hours a day on top of work on it. Then spent time defending my work with people actually knew things, who had worked in the field for decades.
MrBrowncoat on September 26, 2009 at 2:51 AM
http://www.veteranoutrage.com
I watched this live and i was about too throw my shoe
through the tv..
I was absolutly pissed
Why is it that Every one of these God Damed
communist idiots
LIVES HERE in america FREE
WORKS HERE in america MAKING MONEY
EATS HERE in america WELL NOURISHED
PROTESTS HERE in america AND IT PUT ON TV
but these SAME LIBERAL IDIOTS
never had to work to get all of these benefits
never had to sacrifice anything for the freedom to be stupid
never shed their own blood for this nation
No ALL i see is a bunch of
SELFISH
CRYING
WHINNING
BABIE
PUSSIES
all complaining about the evil system
if you dont like it here
GET THE HELL OUT
LEAVE
No american will miss you
Move to iran
or mexico
or china
or russia
Hell i would like too see if these liberals
would last more than a day in these countries..
http://www.veteranoutrage.com
veteranoutrage on September 26, 2009 at 2:59 AM
Children are Marxists because all of their needs are taken care of by doting parents who cringe at the thought of their ‘little dears’ wanting. As a result, they have this Santa Claus mentality that everything should be ‘free,’ because, you know, for them it always has been.
TinMan13 on September 26, 2009 at 3:20 AM
As a wise woman once said to me:
flagrant on September 26, 2009 at 3:20 AM
Looking at those girls reminds me of what several of my long-ago acquaintances said of their own protesting days:
“Who cares what the issue is. It’s a great way of picking up chicks!”
AD
JG27 AD on September 26, 2009 at 4:40 AM
I love the comment of her parents and uncles making only 10 Grand a year. And then the other head of mush says something to the effect that no one needs to make over 500 Grand a year.
Tell ya what, give her parents a million dollars. Have her tell them they should give half of it back just because its not right.
Wanna bet they do what they should have done years ago and slapped some sense into her silly little head.
Note the sort haired girl mentions her studies in the Ph.D. department. Any more proof needed that going to college is in no means one is intelligent. Even at the Ph.D level.
mikkins on September 26, 2009 at 4:55 AM
I caught this live. Those two girls have overdosed on Socialist Kool-aid.
kingsjester on September 26, 2009 at 5:07 AM
Sounds like these two should ask for a refund of the money they have spent on their education. They have received a defective product. Is there a lemon law they can invoke?
jims on September 26, 2009 at 6:11 AM
Ah, the two geniuses had no answer to the simple question “What business is it of yours how much money someone else makes.”
Thank goodness those two don’t belong to me and my money does not go to “Pitt.”
Virginia Shanahan on September 26, 2009 at 6:34 AM
Pittsburgh wanted this in their city? I don’t want that meeting in our country.
Jeff from WI on September 26, 2009 at 6:38 AM
These two will make a couple of guys very lucky. Heck, I can’t even say that with a straight face. Gawd Communists are homely.
Jeff from WI on September 26, 2009 at 6:41 AM
“English Department” grad student. How is it that our universities’ English Departments have become so infested with these lefdt wing dolts? English departments?
sbvft contributor on September 26, 2009 at 7:15 AM
speaking of english, does anyone know how to spell “left”? lol
sbvft contributor on September 26, 2009 at 7:16 AM
Remember their names because they will be in Obama’s administration in the next term.
chickasaw42 on September 26, 2009 at 7:19 AM
Hannity: “You don’t support freedom.”
Oy vey. What an idiot. Please let Fox fire this moron asap. We could use a Mark Steyn show.
Go RBNY on September 26, 2009 at 7:26 AM
Sean Hannity co-opted Jay Leno’s Jaywalking. But Hannity needn’t select nitwits to argue his case for an easy win except to pleasure his audience with what he found off the street.
maverick muse on September 26, 2009 at 7:44 AM
Hey Girls, What’s your stance on the use of toilet paper?
chickasaw42 on September 26, 2009 at 7:49 AM
I am interested in actually following these further protest incidents providing protocol precedent for police response. I can’t help but wonder about the absolute confrontation between police and protesters, no gray area. And no, I’m not faulting the police for protecting themselves.
maverick muse on September 26, 2009 at 7:49 AM
And lesbians, too?
Can’t wait to get my share of AP’s wealth! LOL
I have no great love for the wealthy. It’s human nature that if you accrue a great amount of wealth you become an arrogant a-hole if you weren’t one to begin with…guess that’s how one becomes wealthy in the first place.
The way I see it is that the parasitism is a two-way street. They get what they can from us, we get what we can from them. That’s why I believe in unions (even though a lot of them are corrupt and suck). The wealth is out there to be gained. Some take risks and start their own businesses…some buy stock…others get elected to Congress.
Others sit around and enjoy the fruits of our labor courtesy of the Libtard establishment. You can tax a rich man heavily and he’ll still be rich. But these tax/redistribution Ponzi schemes always hurt average, middle class Americans the most.
Dr. ZhivBlago on September 26, 2009 at 7:50 AM
… hear our prayer.
maverick muse on September 26, 2009 at 7:51 AM
New Jersey.
Jerome Horwitz on September 26, 2009 at 7:57 AM
Imbeciles, don’t you have something a little more descriptive?
tarpon on September 26, 2009 at 7:57 AM
“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.”
Winston Churchill
Friendly21 on September 26, 2009 at 8:02 AM
Typical lefty socialist response from a couple of suburban white chicks, who by yhe way think they can speak for African Americans in Pitt.. next joke.
Viper1 on September 26, 2009 at 8:04 AM
Wow. Twits soon heading to a classroom near you to train and indoctrinate your children, and teach them a thing or two about life.
SilverStar830 on September 26, 2009 at 2:11 AM
Time Travel:
Subtract a few years and these morons were sitting in a classroom in front of a socialist making snarky reamrks about conservatives, the US economic system and most aspects of this country.
Right now they are finishing 15 or 20 years of government subsidized brainwashing in the intellectual cesspool of a “major” university. Of course, major meaning size, not quality. And Penn State is no better, Pitt fans.
A few years in the future and they will be frustrated since their skills are almost worthless in the real world except for the lucky ones who manage to find a paying position in someplace like one of the two “departments” mentioned above.
This is what The One really means when he speaks of jobs for the 21st Century. Sean Hannity tried to explain about efficiently producing items that people want and reaping the reward for both business and customers but their only idea of producing anything has come from decades of living in a classroom dictatorship.
IlikedAUH2O on September 26, 2009 at 8:21 AM
This is what college does to people. Ugh.
Honestly, I think most people are better off learning a trade and joining the work force right out of high school. With a few exceptions, most degrees are leftist social sceince bs that don’t enable people to do much of anything except hide on campus somewhere and spew the bs they’ve been programmed to believe. They’re all so damn bitter too.
But hey, if I paid 45k for a degree and was still worthless to 99.9% of employers, I’d be bitter too. Must sting to spend all that money and not be able to hang in the real world. Myself, with no degree, make more money in a month than those two fools will in the next 5 years.
moonbat monitor on September 26, 2009 at 8:28 AM
Wait! You mean Useful Idiots really are complete morons? Who knew?
Buy Danish on September 26, 2009 at 8:43 AM
Same old Woodstock type drivel.These “broads” are a high school football teams dream.A couple of beers,a little weed and it’s choo choo time.
docflash on September 26, 2009 at 8:51 AM
So Mr. Soros and Mrs. Kerry support these wonderful people. Seems to me that a RICO prosecution might be appropriate. Just asking.
amr on September 26, 2009 at 8:52 AM
Well put and something I’ve thought about Hannity for quite a while. He doesn’t have the intellectual chops to really debate, his whole schtick is just repeating his talking points over and over. I find him painful to watch or listen to.
Ann NY on September 26, 2009 at 8:52 AM
Bet their parents are proud.
yoda on September 26, 2009 at 8:53 AM
My guest blogger from yesterday on this topic is from Duquesne University. The woman up top is from Pittsburgh University- the English Department. Private vs Public education, it makes all the difference. My guest blogger told me days before in preparation, these people were filling buckets with feces and filling water pistols with urine. Yeah that’s who I listen to on Global issues, people who play with their own bodily waste/SARC.
Dr Evil on September 26, 2009 at 8:54 AM
Why can’t they have these summits in Fairbanks, Alaska, or maybe the Aleutians in January. That’ll show who the “true believers” are.
Jeff from WI on September 26, 2009 at 9:06 AM
Sad, but these are our future leaders.
yoda on September 26, 2009 at 9:16 AM
What these idiots don’t understand is that if there would be a stop to letting people make $500,000 a year is that those people wouldnt do what it is that made them the money in the first place such as create a business that hires people and create goods and services that make life much better. They actually think that we can all just split the countrys income and life would remain the same. Man, it makes me want to sream!!
pageram on September 26, 2009 at 9:18 AM
Incredible! BUT a perfect contrast of the systems — socialism “make it equal”; capitalism “maximize freedom”; K Marx vs M Freedman; one fosters lethargy the other personal responsibility.
My favorite was “Who needs to make more than 500k a year?” Answer: BHO and the Clintons for no more real “production” than speeches and books; Al Gore for the scam of “carbon credits.” Michael Moore and O Stone for films with lies and stupidity! I could go on . . .
rebuzz on September 26, 2009 at 9:19 AM
A perfect example of the product of our educational system in this country.
End product of indoctrination and brainwashing with abosolutely no common sense in regards to taking care of themselves and coping with everyday life.
bluegrass on September 26, 2009 at 9:30 AM
Hannity likes to think he can handle these fools.Most of the time they do not want to listen to the other side and the rest of it hannity shows his frustration.Elrushbo he isn’t!His tv show with his great american panel is ridiculous,let’s see who can scream the loudest.No thanks!
ohiobabe on September 26, 2009 at 9:32 AM
That´s all the brain power it takes to get into a PhD program???
Sheesh, I finished my college education too soon.
albill on September 26, 2009 at 9:36 AM
To be young and stupid again, those were the days.
la.rt.wngr on September 26, 2009 at 9:36 AM
I didn’t see it live but saw the re-run overnight.
One of the idiots kept referring to her first amendment rights. So, they believe in THEIR Constitutional rights, but don’t recognize the Constitutional private property rights of others?
Hannity was not on his game if he didn’t catch that and point it out to them. Then again, Hannity tends to just repeat hte same talking points over and over without really thinking of anything new to say. Mark Levin, he’s not.
UltimateBob on September 26, 2009 at 9:40 AM
Where and in what field do you work, may I ask? I’ve all but given up on being able to get any kind of satisfying or well-paying career based on education. What positions the greedy suits haven’t outsourced or automated are in danger of being lost as companies all over nosedive, many due to no real fault of their own.
I’m not afraid to work with my hands for a living but there are almost no trade-based jobs around here that are left…oh yes, and the apprenticeship system has been *totally abandoned* as a cost-saving measure. ‘Training’ is now basically putting a raw recruit out and telling them to learn it on the fly or get fired. I am not joking.
Dark-Star on September 26, 2009 at 9:52 AM
No TP. No showers. And what is with a grad degree in english? We are aborting the english speakers and spanish and arabic are hot. Where do they go to snith wealth when th wealthy run out? The market undrer Der leader lost 10 trillion dollars.
seven on September 26, 2009 at 9:54 AM
They’ll both be working in Wal Mart next year and getting employee discounts.
Fletch54 on September 26, 2009 at 9:56 AM
Actually… about 4:30 the green giant had a good point:
Sean: If you want to redistribute wealth, how do you get people to voluntarily give up their wealth.
green giant: You TAX them
hmmmmmmmm… that seems to be Obama’s strategy in a nutshell.
So… green giant, what do you do when people stop voluntarily paying taxes? (Appoint them to a cabinet posiiton?)
bitsy on September 26, 2009 at 10:03 AM
The solution is sooo simple. ask shorty if she is really committed to socialism. I bet she gives an unconditional yes.
Socialism requieres that if she is “workin” on a doctorate in engrish, every one else gets an identical doctorate in english. If she whines about it, tough. Every american is entitled to a Doctorate in english whether they can speak english or not. Even all her classmates are “entitled” to an A on every test or paper. she says it’s not fair for those that did the work.
Tough. Socialsim says nothing is fair unless all is equal. People that are sloppy spellers are also entitled to perfect grades. Grades are judgemental and the left callls judgementalism the un pardonable sin.
seven on September 26, 2009 at 10:06 AM
“Wouldn’t it be great if their kids grew up to be capitalist pigs?” , says the unrepentant capitalist pig.
Mangy Scot on September 26, 2009 at 10:11 AM
Translation- I agree but I’m too big a chicken sh*t to get involved.
DFCtomm on September 26, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Have you tried offering to work for a non-profit, doing whatever it is you do, for free? I’ve seen your posts on the difficulties of finding a job and my advice would be to just get something that proves you can do the job you were trained for in college. It’s not optimal, and you might need to pick up a second job doing something menial to get some pocket cash, but at this point in your work life, having projects and accomplishments to put on your resume is more important than anything. Given the outlook for the employment market, it’s not going to pick up any time soon, but non-profits are chronically understaffed in areas that require significant skills and also have “looser” hiring/employment practices than companies, i.e. they will let someone work for free, whereas a corporation will not.
This also assumes you can live at home for free, so you’re not having to make a rent payment every month.
venividivici on September 26, 2009 at 10:39 AM
A few places, but quite simply my interests are becoming more mercenary every day I remember my income is $0.00.
*hangs head in shame* Yep.
Dark-Star on September 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »