Will the US join Canada in A’jad walkout?; Update: Video of Harper’s clear, uncompromising language
posted at 10:12 am on September 23, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Our friends to the North have heard enough from Iranian “president” Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, thanks to his Holocaust-denying rants and virulent anti-Semitism. Canada plans to protest his presence today at the United Nations, with their entire delegation walking out of the chamber when Ahmadinejad takes the podium. The big question will be whether other nations join Canada’s protest of this hate-spewing oppressor, including the US:
Canada will boycott Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s speech at the United Nations today, saying his outbursts about the Holocaust and Israel are “shameful.”
Foreign Minister Lawrence Cannon will be at the world body to attend the opening of the UN General Assembly’s annual debate, but officials signal he and other members of the Canadian delegation will vacate when the Islamic republic’s president approaches the podium.
Walking out of the chamber is seen as a strong diplomatic show of disgust at the UN — and since the 192-member chamber is generally packed on the first day of the annual summit, Canada’s empty seats will not go unnoticed.
“President Ahmadinejad’s repeated denial of the Holocaust and his anti-Israel comments run counter to the values of the UN General Assembly, and they’re shameful,” said one Canadian official.
“He uses his public appearances to provoke the international community, and that is why Canada’s seats will be empty.”
Canada will be setting a standard today for the West. Who will sit and listen to Ahmadinejad’s speech and afford him that kind of credibility after his hateful and lunatic rants? One can certainly expect the usual suspects to sit in rapt attention: Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Lebanon, Russia, China, and so on. They have done nothing but enable the mullahs of Iran to conduct nuclear weapons programs, terrorism by proxy, and oppression.
But what about the Western democracies? Will the UK, France, and Germany sit and listen to Ahmadinejad? Iran is one of their trading partners, and thus far none of them have shown much inclination to take opportunities to rebuke Iran in public, except when being accused of fomenting unrest.
How about the US? We don’t have diplomatic relations with Iran, but Barack Obama certainly wants them. He did everything he could to avoid commenting on the rigged election in Iran that put Ahmadinejad on the dais at Turtle Bay. Obama wants talks so badly that the White House has shown no inclination to react to Ahmadinejad’s bigotry. When Canada walks out, it seems extremely unlikely that they will have their southern neighbors joining them — which will be a sorry day indeed for the United States.
Update: Stephen Harper does not mince words:
Impressive. Very impressive. We used to have national leaders here with this kind of clarity.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 … 5 Next »
Of course not.
That would require moral and intellectual clarity. Susan Rice, a moral and intellectual midget, is our UN Ambassador. Hillary Clinton, a moral and intellectual rapist, is our Secretary of State.
Jaibones on September 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM
Need a thread ASAP on Obama’s apology and heinous message to the UN. STAT!
ProudPalinFan on September 23, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Oh please, let me imagine that happening. Isn’t Iran holding four of our citizens? I guess since they aren’t former beauty queens or related to someone from Hollywood they are expendable.
Cindy Munford on September 23, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Let us be clear
We will not walk out and disrespect the Iranian people
blatantblue on September 23, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Definitely a worthwhile Canadian initiative.
Mr. D on September 23, 2009 at 10:17 AM
Walking out would make the U.S. no better than Joe Wilson.
LibTired on September 23, 2009 at 10:17 AM
Hooray to my home country!!! You go, Canada!
mjk on September 23, 2009 at 10:17 AM
Teh Won, a moral and intellectual non sequitor, is our Preceduhnt, too.
VelvetElvis on September 23, 2009 at 10:18 AM
It’s sorry enough that the U.S. didn’t announce their plan to do exactly this before anyone else did.
If the Polish and Czech delegations were to walk out too, they would be definitely be sending a message, and not just to Iran.
Bishop on September 23, 2009 at 10:18 AM
Now I wish I were Canadian. Does Obama remind anyone else of Neville Chamberlain at this point? Why do I get the feeling we are headed into a bloody big war any year now?
Bladerunner1701 on September 23, 2009 at 10:18 AM
Obama: “We have reengaged the UN. We have paid our bill.”
genso on September 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM
That would only happen if Obama had any convictions.
It won’t happen.
bridgetown on September 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Western civilization will die because they won’t stand together for the important issues
swimcoachmike on September 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Nope, that would take cajones and principles.
Mr. Bingley on September 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Not bad company to be in.
VelvetElvis on September 23, 2009 at 10:20 AM
The UN that has significance, because we remain a member. Not the other way around.
Chris_Balsz on September 23, 2009 at 10:20 AM
Obama: “If we are honest with ourselves….”
genso on September 23, 2009 at 10:20 AM
Canada is looking more and more appealing as the days go by.
Grafted on September 23, 2009 at 10:20 AM
Don’t make me laugh. Obama’s entire foreign policy legacy is based on negotiating SOMETHING with Iran. No way on earth he risks that by embarrassing and upsetting them.
Look to his passive reaction to the murderous regime’s actions during the election protests for a clue.
BardMan on September 23, 2009 at 10:20 AM
Hey Mahmoud I’m real happy for you and Imma let you finish, but Gamal Abdel Nasser had one of the best Holocaust denying speeches of ALL TIME.
LibTired on September 23, 2009 at 10:21 AM
Are you kidding? Barry will sit there and clap. He hates the Jews almost as much as Dinnerjacket.
Daggett on September 23, 2009 at 10:21 AM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
ThePrez on September 23, 2009 at 10:21 AM
According to Reuters the Germans will walk out if he denies the Holocaust or makes an anti-semitic statements. They are trying to get a unified approach from other EU members.
I hope they do. Because it’s a sure bet the crazy dinner jacket will say something about the Holocaust or Israel – he always does. All those empty seats would send a powerful message to the world, because you know the press will cover it.
Then again – Qaddafi’s tent on Trump’s property seems to be taking up some headline space this morning.
I think it would be great if the U.S. would walk out on him. But they won’t – the great appeaser-in-chief will sit there and take it.
KrisinNE on September 23, 2009 at 10:21 AM
Of course the US won’t join Canada . . . this is one of Obama’s best buddies.
rplat on September 23, 2009 at 10:22 AM
Join Canada? Obam…uhhh… will bring along extra people to fill the Canadians’ seats when they leave, so as not to insult the genteel Iranian delegation.
Master Shake on September 23, 2009 at 10:23 AM
I’d like to say that for the first time in my life I’m ashamed of my country. I’d like to say that, but I crossed that line sometime earlier this year.
crazy_legs on September 23, 2009 at 10:23 AM
Maybe Alec Baldwin was on to something a few years ago . . .
Dudley Smith on September 23, 2009 at 10:23 AM
The we would grant visas to the Burmese (amongst others) shows our lack of ‘moral clarity’ with these tyrants.
catmman on September 23, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Well, I’ll be walking out in spirit.
Bob's Kid on September 23, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Tom Shipley is tearing out his hair.
a capella on September 23, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Does anyone in this administration have a spine? Yeeeeeah…….no.
Our guys (gals) will sit there and take it.
XWing5 on September 23, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Hopefully.
Rollie on September 23, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Good for Canada. There are some ways where I wish our leadership were more like the Canucks. Unfortunately, the WH just picks all the bad qualities, then sets about to emulate them.
ted c on September 23, 2009 at 10:25 AM
Rumor has it that the Canadians have already turned Ahmadinejad down. Now if those philosophers and uh hockey-lovers can find that kind of nerve.
Mr. Harper is clearly the best prime minister Canada has had in the past 20 years. A world leader in the proper causes, not “climate change” or any of that “peacekeeping” nonsense.
KillerKane on September 23, 2009 at 10:25 AM
Now Ed, how are we supposed to dialog (without pre-conditions) with tyrants if we constantly walk out of their speeches?
BKeyser on September 23, 2009 at 10:25 AM
Seriously, this would go against everything we believe in. We cannot insult the rightful winner of the democratic Iranian election.
LibTired on September 23, 2009 at 10:25 AM
John Bolton is needling a little doll right now….
ted c on September 23, 2009 at 10:25 AM
At this point, I’d walk out on BO.
Bob's Kid on September 23, 2009 at 10:25 AM
The president and his cabinet are not the country.
Esthier on September 23, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Why would we walk out, Obama and Ahmanutjob have the same goals.
cntrlfrk on September 23, 2009 at 10:26 AM
HotAir road trip to Canada!
(That would get weird really fast.)
Diane on September 23, 2009 at 10:26 AM
After Obama apologizes to the two-bit dictators for the US being the imperialistic piece of crap they believe we are, to walk out would go against everything he stands for. Obama has his sight on world leadership and having dictatorships cooperating, their people’s opinions are reduced to one man’s opinion. In the end, Obama will have done to the US what they have always wanted to do. Just give them a peice of the pie and they will help bring us to the level they, with Obama, want us to be.
volsense on September 23, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Ahmadinejad does not outright deny the Holocaust. He asks why people are not allowed to question it. He has a point. Why is it OK to say that astronauts never landed on the moon, but if you ask questions about the Holocaust, you can end up in jail? Ahmadinejad also asks that if the Holocaust did happen, then why do Palestinians have to pay for it? Why shouldn’t Germany pay for it? Another valid point. Ahmadinejad says the the Holocaust was used as a tool by Jews to establish Israel. Veyr true. Israel would not exist today if it was not for the Holocaust story. The West constantly alters or fabricates what Ahmadinejad says. Pay attention to what he really says.
baltimorechronicle.com/2009/092009Parry.shtml
dave742 on September 23, 2009 at 10:26 AM
It will be more interesting if Canada walks out on Zelaya. Our initial response was a knee-jerk emulation of the US before there was time to figure out what was going on. Haven’t heard anything since.
Harper already had reversed the liberal’s anti-zionist policy but there’s an election in the wind and if he’ll be replaced by another Haavaad elite if he screws up.
gh on September 23, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Will the Cubs win the world series?
jbh45 on September 23, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Of course not. They are all a bunch of wusses. I think it’s time the US kicked the UN out of this country.
blr2449 on September 23, 2009 at 10:28 AM
I hope someone has a camera ready for when Barry bows to Ahmadinejad.
Vashta.Nerada on September 23, 2009 at 10:29 AM
The Iranian people know all about Barry’s “moral” leadership.
GarandFan on September 23, 2009 at 10:29 AM
If the U.S. doesn’t walk out at the very beginning, I’m actually hoping that Ahmedinejad delivers an all-time record batshirt anti-Semitic, anti-American sidewinder, to the point that the big media folks cannot possibly avoid asking the White House why they allowed their delegation to give the Iranian loon any respect in the first place.
jon1979 on September 23, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Smoething is rotten in Denmark when the Canadians take a position for truth and freedom and the USA is MIA. Obama’s goals must be to destroy truth and freedom in Honduras and while he ignores that Iran is a Perfect Storm of evil about to sink our ship of state. Ergo, Obama’s goal is the destruction of the USA’s power.
jimw on September 23, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Does a bear crap on a toilet?
TexasDan on September 23, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Do you also believe Hitler did some bad things, probably?
Vashta.Nerada on September 23, 2009 at 10:30 AM
The country voted for this. Whether ignorantly or not, we got what we voted for.
beatcanvas on September 23, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Ok then, can I be ashamed of my fellow Americans who elected President POS?
Even having human garbage such as DinnerJacket on American territory, in NYC no less, is a disgusting travesty. The fact that Ogabe will not join braver nations in a walkout to protest Iranian tripe makes it all that much worse.
Bishop on September 23, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Don’t really care.
Every other blog is afire about Palin’s speech, though. Pretty fun stuff!
AnninCA on September 23, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Go Canadia
Will some one hang back and shout “he lies”????
seven on September 23, 2009 at 10:31 AM
To quote a famous American appeaser “I won” If we wanted a robust foreign policy we shouldn’t have elected a filthy liar and coward.
highhopes on September 23, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Sorry Cannucks, you’ll have to be the ones with the gonads today. Our Dear Leader hasn’t and never will grow a pair and the terrorist know it.
Jeff from WI on September 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM
He certainly has.
Obviously, that’s not the case in Iran or the US or in most countries.
They didn’t pay for it.
Because we destroyed them.
Ever heard of the term “useful idiot”?
Esthier on September 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM
I’d like to hear the reasoning behind that.
a capella on September 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM
Obama will clap knowing full well that Iran is arming the Taliban.
Obama: our enemy within.
BuckeyeSam on September 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM
“which will be a sorry day indeed for the United States.”
Here lately it seems like we’ve been having a lot of these sorry days. How many more are we going to need before the country wakes up and does something about it?
rayvet on September 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM
Mahmoud should never have been allowed into the country.
Much less the UN building.
Since Obama has not enough spine to do that:
-all sane delegates should yell “YOU LIE!” and walk out.
profitsbeard on September 23, 2009 at 10:33 AM
Vashta.Nerada:
“Do you also believe Hitler did some bad things, probably?”
Yes, I believe Hitler did bad things. Funny how you don’t have to do bad things any more to be evil, you only have to say something bad (or have something you say be mistranslated to be something bad).
Hitler did bad things. What has Ahmadinejad acually done that is so bad?
dave742 on September 23, 2009 at 10:34 AM
O/T…..the AP link to Palin is old. There are some articles out now that are far more informative.
AnninCA on September 23, 2009 at 10:34 AM
“The One” is not going to allow our folks to walk out, he is trying so desperately to kiss I’manutjob’s a$$ because he still thinks he can charm his way out of anything.
My question is, what is he going to do when Israel flies missions into Iran to protect their country? My guess, fold and watch them duke it out. I think he would like to see Israel go down, not that they would, and our gas at $10 a gallon.
kam582 on September 23, 2009 at 10:34 AM
I won’t be happy until we walk out of the UN, and never come back.
MarkTheGreat on September 23, 2009 at 10:34 AM
What point? The perpetrators of the crime admit everything, they ADMIT it; what is so effin hard about that? You would have to be stupid on a entirely new level to keep “questioning” the holocaust when the Germans have already owned up to it a million times over.
Bishop on September 23, 2009 at 10:35 AM
Go Canada!
gophergirl on September 23, 2009 at 10:35 AM
Canada has nothing to lose by walking out. The U.S. and its Western Allies have to decide whether war with Iran is inevitable — at a time when we are hardly in shape to make that leap — and can thus afford a gesture that will accomplish nothing save gratuitously pissing off the the Iranians; or whether we want to make a real effort to make the pending negotiations work.
I suggest the latter as the sane option.
Bleeds Blue on September 23, 2009 at 10:35 AM
I agree—-we should RUN OUT!
Rovin on September 23, 2009 at 10:35 AM
Naw, not when we have that fiasco in Honduras to worry about…now that is a “real” threat…if we don’t walk, we will be perceived as weak. It will be another signal to Russia, China, North Korea, Syria, Libya, etc. that our diplomacy will be “beta”…
right2bright on September 23, 2009 at 10:35 AM
Appeasers conveniently forget that Jordan was given to the moslems, and that the ‘palestinians’ couldn’t get along with the Hashemites.
Vashta.Nerada on September 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM
I say probably. The reason why I think the US will walk out b/c we can’t forget that in the end they did boycott Durban II. We all know how much Obambi wanted to attend the conference, but in the end he still boycotted the whole thing. Now Susan Rice is no friend of Israel, but I have a feeling even she won’t put up with Dinnerjackets garbage.
Lance Murdock on September 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM
The Brit’s plan to walk out.
Germany does plan to walk out.
There are many additional reasons to walk out on Ahmedinnerjacket other than just his Holocaust-denying rants and virulent anti-Semitism.
The U.S. will not walk out.
There’s a new Sheriff in town. Barack Hussein Obama does not have the stones.
Also because, naturally, Barackus and Ahmedinnerjacket can’t be buddy pals if B.O. allows the U.S. to walk out.
SilverStar830 on September 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM
they’ve been at war with us for 30 years…get a clue…all your ‘negotiations’ are a waste of time, and just make us look weak..
right4life on September 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM
Barely over half of voters did, and not even half of Americans voted. This man will be out of office before most have a chance to realize what they voted for.
It was childish when Lefty celebrities whined that they’d go to Europe or Canada if Bush won the presidency, and it’s no more different now to treat the president as the country rather than a mere part of the country.
Esthier on September 23, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Killing American troops comes to mind.
Vashta.Nerada on September 23, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Canada, you know you’re on your own, we have a Democrat as President. That means the world knows we’re under weakling leadership.
Jeff from WI on September 23, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Because an American citizen giving a speech is just as important as the illegal president of Iran, who is building nukes, addressing the UN, ranting about evil America, evil gays and evil Jews. Yeah Palin is the news of the day. How did I not see that??
sammypants on September 23, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Very nice.
gh on September 23, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Good morning. I just sent an email to you.
Lightswitch on September 23, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Because astronauts didn’t systematically roast 13 million people? Seriously, no one in this country is in jail for denying the holocaust, you idiot.
LibTired on September 23, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Candidate Obama made it clear that he’d willingly hold face to face summit talks with Morondinajad. So why ask what this Chairman of Security Council is willing to do except to point out the facts? Obama will do everything in his power to empower the current Iranian regime that Jimmy Carter anointed after decapitating the Shah from government. Obama’s apology is A’jad’s dream come true.
Make note: The glory of Potus Obamapologist rests absolutely in proportion to American destruction from within.
And all that FBI/cia/nypd bomb-drill routine is because of this Morondinejad and Ghadafi’s NYC UN contingency parade.
maverick muse on September 23, 2009 at 10:38 AM
I can’t wait to wordfind Obama’s speech text. Need to search for “freedom, democracy, liberty, individuality, or rule of law” in his text.
Makes me think it’ll be a dry hole search…..
ted c on September 23, 2009 at 10:38 AM
BS.
The state of Israel was supposed to come into being in the 1920′s or so. The Balfour declaration was signed in 1910′s with a resolution to make the State of Israel so. Even before that (late 1800′s), the Zionists were buying land no one wanted and making it flower. The State of Israel was inevitable.
Had WWII not happened (and the resulting genocide), it still would have happened. The out-and-out Anti-Semitism of the ENTIRE WORLD just made it happen quicker.
It’s actually a damn shame that Israel wasn’t established sooner. Perhaps then 6 million Jews in Europe wouldn’t have been killed.
mjk on September 23, 2009 at 10:38 AM
Agreed. See how far their anti-American resolutions go without American dollars.
sammypants on September 23, 2009 at 10:39 AM
I can’t wait to wordfind Obama’s speech text. Need to search for “freedom, democracy, liberty, individuality, or rule of law” in his text.
Makes me think it’ll be a dry hole search…..
ted c on September 23, 2009 at 10:38 AM
and then do the same with palin’s
ted c on September 23, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Esthier:
Show me the quote.
In Europe, you can go to jail for denying the Holocaust.
Losing your house is paying for it.
a capella:
Normally, when someone commits a crime, the person or group that committed the crime pays for it. Not a different person or group.
dave742 on September 23, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Canada is just clinging to their morals and principles because they are afraid of people that don’t look like them.
Right Barry?
DeweyWins on September 23, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Funny how so many of the anti-semitic crackpots always use “David” in their screen-names.
That you, Mahmoud? (I heard you had a few Jews in your family’s past.)
profitsbeard on September 23, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Personally, I’d love to see the entire assembly rush the stage and treat that little p***k to the same level of respect that he shows to his own people.
ronnyraygun on September 23, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Iran’s position on the Holocaust is pretty much old news, and bringing it up again on the eve of a meeting is a great way for them to deflect any criticism of their current ongoing atrocities. The US will sit. And why not?
For fear of even irritating Iran, Obama refused to utter a peep when Iran was slaying its own people in the street.
The US will stay.
marybel on September 23, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Canada has nothing to lose by walking out. The U.S. and its
What’s the point of negotiations when the people we negotiate with would lie like a Persian rug for their own gain.
Jeff from WI on September 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Obama will be inside the lecturn while A’jad rants. *slurp, slurp, slurp*
SouthernGent on September 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Sounds like an outright denial to me.
Puddleglum on September 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Jeez. Make a post with more than one link and bannished to Hot Air purgatory you will be.
C’mon Hot Air Pope… bless it already.
SilverStar830 on September 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Killling gays, killing people who convert to Christianity, killing Jews, killing protesters, torturing people, sponsoring terrorism in Iraq, Israel, etc, hiding wanted terrorists in his country, building nukes when he’s not supposed to….. Denying the Holocaust is a very tiny part of this moron’s arsenal of jackholeness.
mjk on September 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM
We won’t walk out. Obama doesn’t have the cajones to stand up to anyone that doesn’t have an R after their name.
Sue on September 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Use google.
Seriously, if you don’t know what Ahmadi Nejad has been saying for the past 3 years you have no business commenting on this topic.
gh on September 23, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 … 5 Next »