Obama to slash nukes: Guardian

posted at 12:55 pm on September 21, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

This should not come as a big surprise, given Barack Obama’s political history, but his drive to drastically restructure the policy on American nuclear weapons could have a far-reaching impact on global security.  Obama will team with Gordon Brown to push for an aggressive schedule of disarmament, so aggressive that even the French have begun to object, according to the Guardian.  Obama apparently hopes to win concessions from Russia and eventually from Iran and North Korea by setting an example:

Barack Obama has demanded the Pentagon conduct a radical review of US nuclear weapons doctrine to prepare the way for deep cuts in the country’s arsenal, the Guardian can reveal.

Obama has rejected the Pentagon’s first draft of the “nuclear posture review” as being too timid, and has called for a range of more far-reaching options consistent with his goal of eventually abolishing nuclear weapons altogether, according to European officials.

Those options include:

• Reconfiguring the US nuclear force to allow for an arsenal measured in hundreds rather than thousands of deployed strategic warheads.

• Redrafting nuclear doctrine to narrow the range of conditions under which the US would use nuclear weapons.

• Exploring ways of guaranteeing the future reliability of nuclear weapons without testing or producing a new generation of warheads.

The review is due to be completed by the end of this year, and European officials say the outcome is not yet clear. But one official said: “Obama is now driving this process. He is saying these are the president’s weapons, and he wants to look again at the doctrine and their role.”

None of this comes out of the blue.  Obama has always echoed strains of the no-nukes crowd in which he marinated in the Ivy League during the 1980s.  His antipathy towards missile defense systems during the campaign hinted at this kind of movement in nuclear-weapons policy.  The Left has often remarked on the supposed hypocrisy of demanding denuclearization of North Korea and prevention of nuclearization of Iran while we keep our own nukes and presumably give tacit agreement to others, especially India and Israel.

However, those arguments ignore the obvious problems of the individual governments that hold the nukes.  India and Israel do not have expansionist or millenial ambitions, as does Iran with its support for radical Islamist terrorist groups.  They are also not totalitarian regimes, as is North Korea, which is also an arms proliferator.  Neither of these governments are likely to be impressed with American disarmament, either.  If we dismantled our entire nuclear regime, this dictators would still pursue their own in order to gain the deterrent they present to aggressive military action.

That is only one of the problems with the utopian no-nukes approach.  Once the technology exists, once the genie has escaped the bottle, it’s impossible to stop.  The problem with nuclear-weapons technology is that it’s becoming rapidly less expensive to produce them, and it’s certainly easier to master than over the past few decades.  There has never been a weapon that disappeared from national stockpiles for reasons other than obsolescence, not long enough so that one nation or another could quickly revive it.

Still, in this age, the threat from nuclear weapons comes not so much from the nation states but from terrorist groups that are their clients, groups that will not be deterred from using them by national stockpiles.  That doesn’t make their deterrent value completely obsolete, but considering the massive damage we could easily inflict on countries like North Korea and Iran without nukes — and the political disaster it would be to use these weapons — reduction may not matter much anyway.

We just need to make sure we get firm concessions and benefits from any reductions, but the track record of this White House thus far indicates we’re much more likely to give away the store.  And that would be a serious blow to American credibility on national and global security.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Worst. President. Ever.

Bruno Strozek on September 21, 2009 at 12:57 PM

Hey, we could all agree to leave our houses unlocked as well.

Great plan Barry!

R Square on September 21, 2009 at 12:57 PM

He actually wants to destabilize the world, doesn’t he?

Vashta.Nerada on September 21, 2009 at 12:57 PM

The French are objecting…

Sorry for all the times we called you “cheese eating surrender monkeys”. T_T

Orange Doorhinge on September 21, 2009 at 12:57 PM

Agreeing we’re too wimpy to use them, anyhow, is creating more problems that it solves.

Chris_Balsz on September 21, 2009 at 12:58 PM

The only nukes allowed will be in Michelles’ armored limo for vegetable shopping.

Coronagold on September 21, 2009 at 12:58 PM

I’m not really against reducing our nuclear stockpile. I just hope we can get something out of it from other nations *cough* missle defense *cough*.

BadgerHawk on September 21, 2009 at 12:58 PM

May I be the first to say, I’m not one bit surprised. Everything we were told was just “hype” in regards to Barry during the election has actually come to pass. He is EXACTLY what we warned people he was.

Shiny_Tiara on September 21, 2009 at 12:59 PM

Liberal political platform: No to nuclear weapons, No to nuclear power plants, No to nuclear families. Sticks, windmills, and welfare forever!

jimmy2shoes on September 21, 2009 at 12:59 PM

Russia/China/NK/Iran: “This is going to be easier than we thought!”

ThePrez on September 21, 2009 at 12:59 PM

What a shocker. Come on, who didn’t see this coming? He pretty much campaigned on this, plus getting rid of SDI.

MDWNJ on September 21, 2009 at 12:59 PM

Let’s hope The Guardian is doing what it always does: wishful Leftist thinking with no real basis in reality.

(Does Barry need Congress to approve this?)

Jenfidel on September 21, 2009 at 12:59 PM

Let’s hope not too many innocent people die before this thug can be removed from office.

Vashta.Nerada on September 21, 2009 at 1:00 PM

Ben Zona. This guy is going to cause WWIII at the rate he’s going.

What is he getting for slashing nukes? Oh, yeah, bupkes.

mjk on September 21, 2009 at 1:00 PM

I miss Bush.

KillerKane on September 21, 2009 at 1:02 PM

Still, in this age, the threat from nuclear weapons comes not so much from the nation states but from terrorist groups that are their clients

However, if we only have a couple hundred nukes, this makes us vulnerable to nation states.

faraway on September 21, 2009 at 1:02 PM

Pants down around our ankles. It’s only a matter of time now. You want some “change”? Gird your loins. The blood will be all over his Marzist/Pacifist hands.

Flyboy on September 21, 2009 at 1:02 PM

Obama will team with Gordon Brown to push for an aggressive schedule of disarmament, so aggressive that even the French have begun to object, according to the Guardian.

Bwahahahaha…sorry, but that’s fuh-neee!

ElectricPhase on September 21, 2009 at 1:02 PM

Exactly when did I move to the Netherlands?

Jed_Eckert on September 21, 2009 at 1:02 PM

Joe Biden explained all this last year:

“Mark my words,” the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We’re about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”

“I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate,” Biden said to Emerald City supporters, mentioning the Middle East and Russia as possibilities. “And he’s gonna need help. And the kind of help he’s gonna need is, he’s gonna need you – not financially to help him – we’re gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it’s not gonna be apparent initially, it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re right.”

The last 65 years mean nothing to this dude.

Mr. D on September 21, 2009 at 1:02 PM

He’s remaking America into a Third World nation. Good job, Barry.

NebCon on September 21, 2009 at 1:02 PM

What a shocker. Come on, who didn’t see this coming? He pretty much campaigned on this, plus getting rid of SDI.

MDWNJ on September 21, 2009 at 12:59 PM

One of the few things he hasn’t lied about.

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/09/21/obama-to-slash-nukes-guardian/

thomasaur on September 21, 2009 at 1:03 PM

(Does Barry need Congress to approve this?)

Jenfidel on September 21, 2009 at 12:59 PM

yes, if he does it through a treaty, he needs Senate approval.

I expect this is his big moment at the UN, “A World without Nukes,” after which he gets the standing ovation.

Wethal on September 21, 2009 at 1:03 PM

This guy is going to cause WWIII at the rate he’s going.

And we won’t have any nuclear weapons in our arsenal by the time we get to that point.

Drained Brain on September 21, 2009 at 1:03 PM

Once again, as it has been for every major move Osama Obama has made since Jan. 20, only one solution will protect this nation from attack, damage or even — as in the case of his disastrous economy-crippling measures — destruction:

Impeachment.

Can we really afford to have the Child-President putting our security in the hands of the Russians, North Koreans, Iranians and terrorist-enablers in the Arab World?

I say no.

Ed’s reasoned discussion is pointless when the person in charge is an unreasonable America-hater.

MrScribbler on September 21, 2009 at 1:03 PM

This is The Guardian, so I am taking their report with a grain of salt. When several other sources say the same thing then I will pull a Claude Rains.

Del Dolemonte on September 21, 2009 at 1:04 PM

I miss Bush.

Heck, I’m starting to miss Clinton.

Drained Brain on September 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM

Obama will team with Gordon Brown to push for an aggressive schedule of disarmament, so aggressive that even the French have begun to object, according to the Guardian.

Gordon Brown has to call an election by next summer, and he’s a dead man walking right now. Definitely want to partner with the guy who won’t be around in a year.

Wethal on September 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM

He is saying these are the president’s weapons, and he wants to look again at the doctrine and their role

Say what???????

MarkTheGreat on September 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM

Obama will team with Gordon Brown to push for an aggressive schedule of disarmament, so aggressive that even the French have begun to object, according to the Guardian

You know, when the French say, “Whoa, slow down, cowboy”, you might want to consider the fact that you’re overstretching.

And we won’t have any nuclear weapons in our arsenal by the time we get to that point.

Drained Brain on September 21, 2009 at 1:03 PM

Yep. Exactly. It’s freaking me out, man.

mjk on September 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM

seceding seem better and better.

upinak on September 21, 2009 at 1:06 PM

Isn’t Gordon Brown’s England already disarmed?

So who is going to stop the insanity?

tarpon on September 21, 2009 at 1:06 PM

OMG We have to figure a strategy to get him the F out of office. He’s on a crusade to destroy all we know America to be.

marklmail on September 21, 2009 at 1:06 PM

The Obamassiah is going to get phunked again.

GarandFan on September 21, 2009 at 1:07 PM

He is saying these are the president’s weapons, and he wants to look again at the doctrine and their role
Say what???????

MarkTheGreat on September 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM

I’ve been wondering about that. Could he, as CiC, unilaterally get rid of US nuclear weapons without waiting for a treaty or Senate approval?

Wethal on September 21, 2009 at 1:07 PM

I miss Bush.

Heck, I’m starting to miss Clinton.

Drained Brain on September 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM

I’m beginning to miss Carter.

Jed_Eckert on September 21, 2009 at 1:07 PM

I’m starting to miss Carter

faraway on September 21, 2009 at 1:07 PM

At what point does our military say NO?

mimi1220 on September 21, 2009 at 1:07 PM

Yes, by all means lets play into the hands of the Russians, Chinese, and most of the American hating Latin countries by completely disarming from nukes and relying on conventional arms so that when they do finally invade they can use tactical nukes to take out our military bases then swarm over us with sheer numbers.

That fits perfectly with this anti-American f*cks plans.

I hate this president as much as he hates our freedom.

Spiritk9 on September 21, 2009 at 1:08 PM

He should be impeached if this happens. We can disagree on somethings like spending and healthcare but this area is not open to debate.

lavell12 on September 21, 2009 at 1:08 PM

The ignorance, arrogance and outright stupidity of this guy is becoming more and more dangerous.

It’s clear he either has no idea what it is he’s doing or he actually wants to hurt this country.

Either why, every day he’s in office is irresonsbily damaging this country. This guy is a complete disaster in every sense of the word.

NoDonkey on September 21, 2009 at 1:08 PM

Concessions? What’s that?

/obama

brak on September 21, 2009 at 1:09 PM

This is also a way of sticking to the Israelis, who have never confirmed they have nukes or how many. Everyone assumes they do, but they would have to release the info, if Obama gets his way.

Wethal on September 21, 2009 at 1:09 PM

We’re surrendering so fast, that even the French are getting nervous.

MarkTheGreat on September 21, 2009 at 1:09 PM

Change. Now for the hope…

NickelAndDime on September 21, 2009 at 1:09 PM

Carter will look like a genius and hawk in the end.

Schadenfreude on September 21, 2009 at 1:09 PM

The question circulating around is: Is Obama just an extreme example of The Peter Pinciple in action or does he truly hate America? The answer is YES.

kingsjester on September 21, 2009 at 1:10 PM

You’ve got to love The Messiah – I mean he is 100% consistently a Marxist Commie Nigerian/Kenyan nit wit scum bag! Wow. He NEVER varies – he’s 100% wrong all the time! Got to love those Dems!

Cinday Blackburn on September 21, 2009 at 1:10 PM

Amy Carter is now getting her wish (for any of you old enough to remember).

Knucklehead on September 21, 2009 at 1:10 PM

Heck, I’m starting to miss Clinton.

Drained Brain on September 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM

I have a sad feeling, that by the end of next year, I will be missing Carter.

MarkTheGreat on September 21, 2009 at 1:10 PM

of course he is. And Dick Lugar who made Obama seem so moderate pre election will be there right beside him..

ginaswo on September 21, 2009 at 1:10 PM

I’m moving to Texas and hope they secede…

PatriotRider on September 21, 2009 at 1:11 PM

“No-Nukes”
Yet another mem bestowed upon the US left by the soviets, in the hope it would lead to US defeat.
News flash: reducing our nuclear stockpiles increases, not decreases, the motivation of other countries to build up there own.

Count to 10 on September 21, 2009 at 1:13 PM

Ronald Reagan….it’s time to roll over again…

PatriotRider on September 21, 2009 at 1:13 PM

He’s creating jobs. Disarming those nukes will require work. Making new replacement bombs will also require work.

ballz2wallz on September 21, 2009 at 1:13 PM

This is going to backfire on Barry and the statists. The American people do not want disarmament. There has got to be something that we can do to stop this insanity.

farright on September 21, 2009 at 1:14 PM

His plan is to leave us open for attacks so there will be less people to cover with Universal Health Care.

Elizabetty on September 21, 2009 at 1:14 PM

I’m starting to miss Carter

faraway on September 21, 2009 at 1:07 PM

Seeing that posted repeatedly among conservative blog comments makes me wonder whether those “rapture” nutballs might be on to something after all.

ElectricPhase on September 21, 2009 at 1:14 PM

I’m moving to Texas and hope they secede…

PatriotRider on September 21, 2009 at 1:11 PM

H*ll, I’m actively looking for jobs in Canada or Israel. I’m getting out whilst the getting’s good.

mjk on September 21, 2009 at 1:14 PM

The French response doesn’t surprise me. The French love them some nukes!

I’m not really against reducing our nuclear stockpile. I just hope we can get something out of it from other nations *cough* missle defense *cough*.

BadgerHawk on September 21, 2009 at 12:58 PM

This is pretty much my position as well. Unfortunately, Obama is a p***y (as his naive notion that rogue nations would agree to cooperate in his Kumbayah exercise clearly demonstrates) so we’re as good as cooked IMO.

Heck, I’m starting to miss Clinton.

Drained Brain on September 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM

I’ve been missing him since Jan. 20. Scary.

NoLeftTurn on September 21, 2009 at 1:14 PM

I miss Bush.

Heck, I’m starting to miss Clinton.

Drained Brain on September 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM

I miss Reagan

Jeff from WI on September 21, 2009 at 1:15 PM

He actually wants to destabilize the world, doesn’t he?

Vashta.Nerada on September 21, 2009 at 12:57 PM

He would see it as shifting the balance of power – away from the US, Europe and its close allies. That the effect will undoubtedly be destabilization I have no doubt, but I suspect he thinks that this is hopenchange that will bring about equality and world peace. Maybe he should have entered a beauty pageant instead of politics…

ProfessorMiao on September 21, 2009 at 1:15 PM

Obama proves yet again to be a game changer and has unilaterally solved the old debate of guns or butter that has faced governments for decades.

Headline: President declares for butter!

R Square on September 21, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Wait, it’s all part of the master plan, and a great one at that. The man is brilliant I tell you, absolutely brilliant. What he is doing has become crystal clear. He is catching our enemies off guard. We have them flat-footed!! They have no counter moves. They are at a loss since there was no contingency for the “completely f’n stupid” scenario now being played out. /sarc off

Jed_Eckert on September 21, 2009 at 1:16 PM

IF you outlaw guns nukes the only ones who have guns nukes will be outlaws.

The “crime” rate is sure to go up

thebrokenrattle on September 21, 2009 at 1:16 PM

The French are objecting…

Sorry for all the times we called you “cheese eating surrender monkeys”. T_T

Orange Doorhinge on September 21, 2009 at 12:57 PM

Dear Leader is turning us into arugula eating surrender monkeys.

No, I’m not calling The One a monkey.

rbj on September 21, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Still, in this age, the threat from nuclear weapons comes not so much from the nation states but from terrorist groups that are their clients, groups that will not be deterred from using them by national stockpiles. That doesn’t make their deterrent value completely obsolete, but considering the massive damage we could easily inflict on countries like North Korea and Iran without nukes — and the political disaster it would be to use these weapons — reduction may not matter much anyway.

Ed, this is either very naieve of you, or else you are seriously deficient in your understanding of our military capabilities.

pseudonominus on September 21, 2009 at 1:17 PM

H*ll, I’m actively looking for jobs in Canada or Israel. I’m getting out whilst the getting’s good.

mjk on September 21, 2009 at 1:14 PM

Canada is what we’ll beome.Israel seems like it has a back bone. You think they need a few goyem?

Jeff from WI on September 21, 2009 at 1:17 PM

He is saying these are the president’s weapons, and he wants to look again at the doctrine and their role.”

EPIC FAIL. Peace through complete and treasonous abdication of responsibility to protect the U.S.? This ivory tower nonsense has to stop – its getting far too dangerous.

Congress needs to block this by threatening to cut off funding for something Barry cares about and that itsn’t actually constitutionally relevant. How about the Dept. of Education?

Firefly_76 on September 21, 2009 at 1:17 PM

That is only one of the problems with the utopian no-nukes approach. Once the technology exists, once the genie has escaped the bottle, it’s impossible to stop.

Details, yawn. Don’t you know the theories he developed, as a student at Harvard, represent the pinnacle of all human thought on the subject? No additional knowledge, especially added by so-called experts, could possibly add to thoughts on the matter?

NickelAndDime on September 21, 2009 at 1:17 PM

The Lightworker learned absolutely nothing from the Left’s “no-nukes” debacle in the ’80s.

Cicero43 on September 21, 2009 at 1:17 PM

farright on September 21, 2009 at 1:14 PM

Barry and the Statists sounds like a rock band.

THEN WHY ISN’T THIS GROOVY NEWS?!?! DX

Orange Doorhinge on September 21, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Dear Leader is turning us into arugula eating surrender monkeys.

No, I’m not calling The One a monkey.

rbj on September 21, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Surrender monkey…LOL..I like it, it fits so well!

Jeff from WI on September 21, 2009 at 1:18 PM

Give them to Israel.

shaken on September 21, 2009 at 1:18 PM

But one official said: “Obama is now driving this process. He is saying these are the president’s weapons, and he wants to look again at the doctrine and their role.”

That is patently false. They are the NATION’S weapons, and not HIS. He is commander in chief od the military, but it is up to Congress to say what the military will consist of.

Those weapons are in our arsenal to provide deterrence to any aggressor who would see us as the target of his ambitions, or, lastly, to retaliate if needs be in order to punish an aggressor or deny an aggressor the means to accomplish his goals.

Those weapons are a part pf the means to protect the Constitution against our enemies, and must never be taken lightly or as a political weapon against political enemies, or to gain some national political advantage.

By this very claim, that they are “The President’s” weapons, Obama has shown his naivete, and lack of understanding of his job as President, and thus incapable of providing the executive decision-making and leadership that this nation needs and demands.

I agree that such a consideration as slashing or eliminating our nuclear weapons should be seen as a “clear and present danger” to the nation, and grounds for impeachment.

AW1 Tim on September 21, 2009 at 1:18 PM

The blood will be all over his Marzist/Pacifist hands.

Flyboy on September 21, 2009 at 1:02 PM

Will?
I’m betting there are already people dying in Iraq and Afghanistan that wouldn’t have been had he not been elected.

Count to 10 on September 21, 2009 at 1:19 PM

what an idiot, he will be cheered however as a peace maker by the Idiots on the far-left and the Idiots on the Lew Rockwell/Ron Paul ‘right’

jp on September 21, 2009 at 1:20 PM

How about a re play of Honduras here in Amerika? Uphold the Constitution.

david kumbera on September 21, 2009 at 1:20 PM

Great post AW1!

RobD on September 21, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Don’t we all wish this were one of those dreams where the dreamer is given the picture of what things would be like if they make a bad choice…

Wake up wake up the 2008 elections have happened yet there is still time to save the world from Obama.

Grrrr. It’s not a dream. Our country really is being spoiled.

petunia on September 21, 2009 at 1:21 PM

It’s time for national GOP leadership to call Barry ANTI-American and demand his resignation… First Governor to do so in a session of his/hers state legislature wins the 2012 GOP nomination

phreshone on September 21, 2009 at 1:22 PM

Maybe my governor should put some North Korean nukes on the old VISA just in case Obambi completely stands down.

flyfisher on September 21, 2009 at 1:23 PM

I’d say we’re all going to die, but that would be racist.

LibTired on September 21, 2009 at 1:23 PM

How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love Michelle’s Arms

Christien on September 21, 2009 at 1:23 PM

No, I’m not calling The One a monkey.

rbj on September 21, 2009 at 1:16 PM

You’re a racist for thinking of it. And you’re a racist for criticizing Obama. And you’re a racist just because it’s now cool to call people racists.

Daggett on September 21, 2009 at 1:23 PM

I’d say we’re all going to die, but that would be racist.

LibTired on September 21, 2009 at 1:23 PM

Too late, racist.

Daggett on September 21, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Pants down around our ankles. It’s only a matter of time now.

Flyboy on September 21, 2009 at 1:02 PM

Every Leftist knows that in prison, the guy with his pants around his ankles gets the most respect from his fellow inmates.

Cicero43 on September 21, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Sick.

the_nile on September 21, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Those options include:

• Reconfiguring the US nuclear force to allow for an arsenal measured in hundreds rather than thousands of deployed strategic warheads.

• Redrafting nuclear doctrine to narrow the range of conditions under which the US would use nuclear weapons.

• Exploring ways of guaranteeing the future reliability of nuclear weapons without testing or producing a new generation of warheads.

With the first option this traitor is trying to unilaterally disarm us of our most effective weapons.

With the second option this fool is trying to tie our hands and give the advantage to the Enemy.

With the third option this scumbag is trying to ensure that his treason extends for long past his regime.

I am angry beyond words.

pseudonominus on September 21, 2009 at 1:25 PM

“Obama apparently hopes to win concessions from Russia and eventually from Iran and North Korea by setting an example…” -Ed

I’m confident that Russia, Iran and North Korea will put their concessions in writing and that Obama will stand on the steps of Air Force One, wave that paper in the air and declare “peace in our time”. We have nothing to worry about.

SKYFOX on September 21, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Oh, John McCain, what was that you said about not being afraid of Obama as president? Thanks for one of the worst-run campaigns in history (outside of the VP pick).

Wethal on September 21, 2009 at 1:25 PM

If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.

Hellrider on September 21, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Faith-based foreign policy.

rockmom on September 21, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Will someone PLEASE wake me up- I’m having one helluva nightmare!

cibolo on September 21, 2009 at 1:26 PM

All we need is a photo of him waving a couple sheets of paper over his head; the caption will write itself.

“There will be peace in our time!”
– N. Chamberlain, J. Carter, B. Obama

Blacksmith on September 21, 2009 at 1:27 PM

I’d say we’re all going to die, but that would be racist. Boy.

LibTired on September 21, 2009 at 1:23 PM

That’s how Maureen Dowd and I heard it, anyway.

Cicero43 on September 21, 2009 at 1:27 PM

It’s time for national GOP leadership to call Barry ANTI-American and demand his resignation… First Governor to do so in a session of his/hers state legislature wins the 2012 GOP nomination

phreshone on September 21, 2009 at 1:22 PM

Pawlenty’s getting pretty damn close. Keep an eye on him.

rockmom on September 21, 2009 at 1:27 PM

I’m confident that Russia, Iran and North Korea will put their concessions in writing and that Obama will stand on the steps of Air Force One, wave that paper in the air and declare “peace in our time”. We have nothing to worry about.

SKYFOX on September 21, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Yep and the MSM and crackpots will rejoice that the One has ‘saved the world’ from the Evil USA

jp on September 21, 2009 at 1:27 PM

Neville Chamberlain In Our Time!

kingsjester on September 21, 2009 at 1:27 PM

I miss Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Jackson, Lincoln, Grant, Cleveland, McKinley, Roosevelt…

Orange Doorhinge on September 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3