New ACORN video: Murder in California?

posted at 4:52 pm on September 15, 2009 by Allahpundit

I’ve been checking Big Government since 4 p.m. for the new clip but it looks like they’re going to wait and roll it out simultaneously with Beck’s show on Fox, which I assume pretty much all of you will be watching. Here’s your thread to comment. The rumors of what’s on this new one are scandalous, but they’re still only rumors — for a few more minutes at least. I’ll post the clips here as soon as they’re available.

Over/under on how many questions the community-organizer-in-chief gets about ACORN during his Sunday morning media blitz: One. Stand by for updates.

Update: Here we go.

Looks like we’ve got a confession to either murder or manslaughter in the very first minute here. Can’t wait for that House vote on whether to keep funding this syndicate.

Update: And now, within the second minute, we’ve got a death threat from the murderer/manslaughterer.

Update: I’m not even halfway through and this woman’s spitting out names of California pols she claims to regularly “lobby.” Boxer is among them.

Update: The first clip ends with her confessing to having run a prostitution ring of her very own and, naturally, not declaring a dime of the proceeds to the IRS. Presumably ACORN’s defense will be that this woman’s full-blown nuts and is spinning a yarn to impress her clients, but (a) she sure is specific about dollar amounts, and (b) San Bernardino PD will have something to say about her ex, I’m guessing. Stand by while we wait for the next clip, which I’ll post below.

Update: It’s 6 p.m. and they still haven’t posted the next vid. Maybe they’re saving it for tomorrow? If so, two parting thoughts for now. One: Giles dropped a big hint in her BG post this afternoon that this isn’t the last office they visited. Which makes sense. Why go to the trouble of flying out to the coast to visit only San Bernardino? Two: As sensational as the details about murder are, don’t let that swallow up the larger story about the pattern of conspiracy in covering up sex trafficking that O’Keefe and Giles keep finding at ACORN offices. The murder stuff might not be true or she might already have done her time or, although it sounds unlikely, it might have been a legitimate case of self-defense. ACORN apologists are desperate to change the subject and this may end up giving them a chance. As O’Keefe reminds us, Alinsky Rule #8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”

Update: A clever point from Goldfarb. If ACORN believes all these videos are doctored, why are they firing the employees involved?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 7 8 9 10

Well, I may be wrong, just let me know if I am, but I thought the senate voted on the funding issue yesterday, before this vid came out. So I don’t see the connection between this release today and what happened yesterday.

You are wrong, dumbass. The first tape came out last week. That you don’t see a connection is irrelevant.

As for who cares if she killed someone or not just looking at the title of the thread tells me someone cares. My concern with the truth of her boast is what some posters here have called due diligence. If it turns out to be just pipe-smoker’s shit talking, and due diligence is lacking it leaves a little hole for the enemy to smut up Big Pimpin’s investigative integrity–a subject discussed everyday on HA. To you it’s irrelevant, to me it’s not

.

But, you are an idiot – I am not.

Well, I’ll put forth the argument that they may not be 50, but they are criminal investigators, of a sort, since they’re investigating what we all think is the biggest criminal enterprise in the nation.

No, they’re not criminal investigators, dumbass. And stop saying we, jerk.

Lastly, I consider the pimp and the ho’ as brave hero’s just as you do. We just see a few things differently.

Gang-of-One on September 15, 2009 at 9:27 PM

You’re either putting words into people’s mouths or acting like some kind of victim. As to seeing things differently, I see you for what you are: an ahole.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 9:55 PM

who’s interviewing The Won on sunday?

Stephanopolous?
Wallace?

who is it, anyone know/

ted c on September 15, 2009 at 9:49 PM

Hey, Ted.

From The Washington Post
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/09/14/obama_to_appear_on_5_sunday_ta.html?wprss=44

In making the rounds — appearing on NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN and Univision back-to-back — Obama will do a modified version of “the Full Ginsburg,” as such a sweep was dubbed after Monica Lewinsky’s lawyer, William H. Ginsburg, became the first person to do five broadcast shows it in 1998.

So, he’s making the rounds, just like the media wh*re he is.

Oops…is that racist?

GrannyDee on September 15, 2009 at 9:56 PM

Geez, that’s like the equivalent of wwwhhhhatevahhh.

No, that’s pointing out what is obvious to everyone but you.

What’s next banishment to troll list?

Gang-of-One on September 15, 2009 at 9:49 PM

Thank you for admitting what you are – a troll, however, we all knew that already.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 9:58 PM

trolling is such fun…..

lovingmyUSA on September 15, 2009 at 9:59 PM

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 9:58 PM

Trophey…

lovingmyUSA on September 15, 2009 at 10:00 PM

7 pages and only one troll showed up. Too bad I stated his tediously repeated lines two times before he showed up. LOL!

This is your side lefties. You own this.

daesleeper on September 15, 2009 at 10:01 PM

or should I say trollphy

lovingmyUSA on September 15, 2009 at 10:01 PM

Obama’s silence on this is deafening. The fact that he has said nothing can only indicate that he has no problem with ACORN’s behavior.

I’d imagine Obummer and everyone associated with this would be terrified of uttering a single word at present. Remember, they don’t know what’s coming next. Their own guilt will lead them to make some scary speculations on what might be revealed. So, better to shutup and let everyone believe you’re in it up to your neck, than to open your mouth and confirm it or make it worse.

OTOH, he just can’t seem to help himself can he. Next week could be very entertaining.

Ozwitch on September 15, 2009 at 10:01 PM

From The Washington Post
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/09/14/obama_to_appear_on_5_sunday_ta.html?wprss=44

In making the rounds — appearing on NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN and Univision back-to-back — Obama will do a modified version of “the Full Ginsburg,” as such a sweep was dubbed after Monica Lewinsky’s lawyer, William H. Ginsburg, became the first person to do five broadcast shows it in 1998.

So, he’s making the rounds, just like the media wh*re he is.

Oops…is that racist?

GrannyDee on September 15, 2009 at 9:56 PM

this is just peachy.

I say we target all of these outlets. Say NBC/CBS tomorrow, ABC/CNN Thursday and UNIvision/NBC Friday and CBS/ABC/CNN Saturday?

needs to be a massive wave of emails calls. I think bucsox previously posted all of the contact info for these folks previous in this thread.

ted c on September 15, 2009 at 10:03 PM

Over/under on how many questions the community-organizer-in-chief gets about ACORN during his Sunday morning media blitz: One. Stand by for updates.

I predict he comes down with swine flu and cancels the interviews. Then he spends the weekend hidding in the bunker at Joe Biden’s house.

bitsy on September 15, 2009 at 10:05 PM

you forgot …”and sucking his thumb” bitsy…

ted c on September 15, 2009 at 10:05 PM

I just don’t know why all you Beckheads actually buy into this

/larryannonline

Upstater85 on September 15, 2009 at 10:06 PM

you forgot …”and sucking his thumb” bitsy…

ted c on September 15, 2009 at 10:05 PM

Lolz.

Waaahhh. Being president is so hard.

bitsy on September 15, 2009 at 10:10 PM

I’d imagine Obummer and everyone associated with this would be terrified of uttering a single word at present. Remember, they don’t know what’s coming next. Their own guilt will lead them to make some scary speculations on what might be revealed. So, better to shutup and let everyone believe you’re in it up to your neck, than to open your mouth and confirm it or make it worse.

OTOH, he just can’t seem to help himself can he. Next week could be very entertaining.

Ozwitch on September 15, 2009 at 10:01 PM

Chickens meet roost.

ROFLOL

GrannyDee on September 15, 2009 at 10:10 PM

ACORN = plague to the United States.

Quarantine it; then kill it.

BuckeyeSam on September 15, 2009 at 10:14 PM

Hannity just reported that Charlie Gibson hadn’t heard about any of the ACORN tapes.

Boy, that really made me laugh. The guests said, “He’s the guy who peered over his glasses down at Palin, right?”

:)

Sweet.

AnninCA on September 15, 2009 at 10:16 PM

lovingmyUSA on September 15, 2009 at 9:59 PM

You’ve got the ammo to hunt them too!!!

yoda on September 15, 2009 at 10:16 PM

Thank you for admitting what you are – a troll, however, we all knew that already.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 9:58 PM

How do you take that as an admission of being a troll?

I come to HA because I’m on the same page as far as the issues reported and discussed here.

I may be a rookie at HA, but your claim to have won a troll trophy is way off base.

Gang-of-One on September 15, 2009 at 10:17 PM

Update: A clever point from Goldfarb. If ACORN believes all these videos are doctored, why are they firing the employees involved?

They are just stunned and trying to say tactics they probably used/use on Palin are being used on them. Their way of doing things can’t let them believe two young individuals used their savings to uncover their organization for what it is – corrupt.

truetexan on September 15, 2009 at 10:18 PM

Charlie Gibson is a misogynist (that’s a dude that hates women) and denigrates them with his behavior. I can’t wait till he requests an oval office interview with her.

ted c on September 15, 2009 at 10:18 PM

I bet every sphincter in the White House slammed shut tonight about 5:45 when Beck outed more Obama-approved ACORN toolbags for the corruptocrat tax wasting scumbags they are. Unsurprisingly, they’re in California.

ted c on September 15, 2009 at 10:20 PM

In making the rounds — appearing on NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN and Univision back-to-back —

Is he not appearing on Fox? Hmmmmmmm

Red State State of Mind on September 15, 2009 at 10:21 PM

Charlie Gibson is a misogynist (that’s a dude that hates women) and denigrates them with his behavior. I can’t wait till he requests an oval office interview with her.

ted c on September 15, 2009 at 10:18 PM

I think I got even a bigger kick out of the Country Western singer guys who just said what I kept saying about how Gibson peered down at her.

That was unbelievably rude of Gibson!

Next up, Couric. *haha

AnninCA on September 15, 2009 at 10:22 PM

What’s funny to me. The things people are saying about the teaparty people?

Actually apply to the ACORN employees. :)

Whew, we are talking some rather “rough-edged” folks here.

AnninCA on September 15, 2009 at 10:24 PM

Target: NBC
Target: ABC
Target: CNN
Target: CBS
Target: Univision

there shouldn’t be a janitor left in those organizations who doesn’t know that the president needs to be questioned in regards to ACORN, with multiple followups.

ted c on September 15, 2009 at 10:25 PM

ACORN and all of its front/side/sister organizations needs to be turned over–page by page, fund by fund, brick by brick and lawyer by lawyer. There may be some endearing qualities about such an organization but no American can defend the trafficking of minor girls for sex slavery–that, we can agree upon.

ted c on September 15, 2009 at 10:27 PM

Shazam!

Hening on September 15, 2009 at 10:32 PM

ACORN and all of its front/side/sister organizations needs to be turned over–page by page, fund by fund, brick by brick and lawyer by lawyer. There may be some endearing qualities about such an organization but no American can defend the trafficking of minor girls for sex slavery–that, we can agree upon.

ted c on September 15, 2009 at 10:27 PM

It cracks me up that this is being revealed as complete widespread within the organization.

Talk about organizational problems. :)

AnninCA on September 15, 2009 at 10:32 PM

So lets hear what the slime ball spokesman for ACORN has to say now. The left leaning talk shows are blaming the investigators instead of taking any responsibility for these criminals. Oh & Where is Obama on all this?

Bert Convy on September 15, 2009 at 10:35 PM

In making the rounds — appearing on NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN and Univision back-to-back —

Is he not appearing on Fox? Hmmmmmmm

Red State State of Mind on September 15, 2009 at 10:21 PM

Nope. Not Fox. Bambi may not be the brightest bulb in the lamp, but he’s smart enough to know he should stay as far away from Fox as possible. Too bad.

Can’t help but wonder how he’s going to explain at Univision about illegals not being covered in his health care plan, based on his Wednesday night speech.

Wait. I know. It’s those Wascally Wepublicans.

GrannyDee on September 15, 2009 at 10:37 PM

It cracks me up that this is being revealed as complete widespread within the organization.

Talk about organizational problems. :)

AnninCA on September 15, 2009 at 10:32 PM

Your medication is talking, making no sense, and is not masking your mobiness.

Get stuffed and jog off.

daesleeper on September 15, 2009 at 10:38 PM

Breitbart did do a full lexis / nexis search on the alleged incident I hope????

phreshone on September 15, 2009 at 10:38 PM

So lets hear what the slime ball spokesman for ACORN has to say now. The left leaning talk shows are blaming the investigators instead of taking any responsibility for these criminals. Oh & Where is Obama on all this?

Bert Convy on September 15, 2009 at 10:35 PM

So why are they firing people…

the_nile on September 15, 2009 at 10:39 PM

Your medication is talking, making no sense, and is not masking your mobiness.

Get stuffed and jog off.

daesleeper on September 15, 2009 at 10:38 PM

OK, I’ll spell it out. This is widespread because it’s not just one employee or one story, it’s being multiplied daily with new exposes.

Now, does THAT make sense?

AnninCA on September 15, 2009 at 10:42 PM

Okay, everybody, here we go. Acorn is striking back.

http://www.sbsun.com/breakingnews/ci_13342555

UPDATE: ACORN organizer rips video
By Andrew Edwards
Posted: 09/15/2009 05:42:16 PM PDT

SAN BERNARDINO – The head organizer for California ACORN says a new video that appears to show a staffer at the organization’s San Bernardino office is fake journalism.

The video, which was posted shortly before 2 p.m. Tuesday on a Web site called Big Government.com, shows a female ACORN employee talking to a man who claims to be a pimp interested in establishing a brothel where underage immigrant prostitutes would turn tricks in order to raise money for political activity.

The woman, identified on the video as Tresa Kaelke, appears on posted footage to be interested in cooperating the plan. However, California ACORN head organizer Amy Schur said the video is a gross misrepresentation of what actually happened.

“In this video, there are two actors who come into our office and who were messing with us. And our employee was messing with them,” Schur said.

She said that the complete and unedited video needs to be released to the public.

Schur said that in a moment not shown on the edited video, Kaelke asked the undercover “pimp” if he was joking and then proceeded to play along with the joke.

Furthermore, Schur said that Kaelke will sign an affidavit stating that she was not seriously entertaining the idea of cooperating with an apparent attempt to establish a house of prostitution.

“She (Kaelke) asked if they were joking and asked if they were reporters. They said they weren’t reporters and they aren’t. This is not legitimate news,” Schur said.

Schur’s statements follow comments from ACORN office supervisor Christina Spach, who said Kaelke was afraid of the “pimp” and “prostitute” who broached the prostitution ploy at ACORN’s San Bernardino office.

The Big Government.com video identifies the “pimp” as James O’Keefe and the “prostitute” as Hannah Giles. O’Keefe and Giles could not be reached immediately for comment.

Sign an affidavit? SIGN AN AFFIDAVIT??? Kaelke talks on the tape about getting away with murder and running a prostitution ring, and now she’s going to sign an affidavit that she was joking and afraid of the “pimp and prostitute”!!!!

ROFLOL

GrannyDee on September 15, 2009 at 10:56 PM

The folks at Hannity’s forum have the lowdown on Mme Tresa’s former id:

Ozwitch on September 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM

They do, and they don’t… what follows was found in California records accessible the (paying) public…

Tresa M. Parten married Duane A. Berhow on 04-Jul-1964

Name: Parten, Tresa M; Age: 15
Est. Birth: abt 1949
Spouse Name: Berhow, Duane A; Spouse Age: 18
Est. Spouse Birth: abt 1946
Date: 04-Jul-1964; Location: Los Angeles County

Tresa M. Parten divorced Duane A. Berhow in Apr-1974

Name: Parten, Tresa M; Yr. Birth: 1948
Spouse Name: Berhow, Duane A; Yr. Spouse Birth: 1946
Married: 1964; Divorced: Apr-1974; Location: Los Angeles County

Son of Tresa M. Parten and Duane A. Berhow was Duane Allen Berhow, Jr.

Born: 28-Nov-1964, Los Angeles County, CA
Died: 28-Sep-1992, San Bernardino County, CA
SSN: 561 19 xxxx

Residences of Duane A Berlow (unclear whether father or son)
13130 Carfax Av, Downey, CA 90242-1001 (1972, 1988)
6960 Stanley Av, Long Beach, CA 90805-0901 (1992, 1993)
14406 Castana, Paramount, CA 90723-3606 (1993, 1994, 1995)

Tresa M. Parten married Donald C. Kaelke on 05-Nov-1983

Name: Parten, Tresa M; Age: 35
Est. Birth: abt 1948
Spouse Name: Kaelke, Donald C; Spouse Age: 40
Est. Spouse Birth: abt 1943
Date: 05-Nov-1983; Location: Los Angeles County

I found no California public records regarding the deaths of either Duane A Barhow Sr. or Donald C. Kaelke.

ya2daup on September 15, 2009 at 11:02 PM

I found no California public records regarding the deaths of either Duane A Barhow Sr. or Donald C. Kaelke.

ya2daup on September 15, 2009 at 11:02 PM

Me either. I’ve found other documents, but nothing to confirm the husbands aren’t still alive and kicking.

I honestly think this woman is just off her rocker. Still looks pretty bad for Acorn though.

Meezles on September 15, 2009 at 11:07 PM

I just watched it again, that woman was not joking.

ORconservative on September 15, 2009 at 11:07 PM

Crazy, i’d believe, joking? No way.

ORconservative on September 15, 2009 at 11:08 PM

Okay, everybody, here we go. Acorn is striking back.

http://www.sbsun.com/breakingnews/ci_13342555

UPDATE: ACORN organizer rips video
By Andrew Edwards
Posted: 09/15/2009 05:42:16 PM PDT

SAN BERNARDINO – The head organizer for California ACORN says a new video that appears to show a staffer at the organization’s San Bernardino office is fake journalism.

ROFLOL

GrannyDee on September 15, 2009 at 10:56 PM

You can bet your sweet a$$ that ACORN knows what other cities were visited and they already have statements/denials/etc all lined up ready to go.

darwin-t on September 15, 2009 at 11:09 PM

OH MY! John Stewart just did the FUNNIEST bit on the Acorn Scandal. Holy Guacamole it was hilarious – if the liberals who watch John Stewart didn’t get the Acorn story from their favorite news show (the usual suspects) they have to be dying to get the scoop now.

ace tomato on September 15, 2009 at 11:15 PM

ACORN is changing their name…

Dollayo on September 15, 2009 at 7:56 PM

…to LYCHEE! You can call us LIE-chee or you can call us LEECH-ee: either way you know what we do (and we’re still nuts)!

ya2daup on September 15, 2009 at 11:22 PM

Im sure it was nothing but a joke to Jon Stewart. Something that big, he cant take seriously unless it was against a conservative group.

He’s got a funny show, but I cant watch him. He’s way too liberal and chooses to see only what he wants to see as far as truth goes. Screw him

bucsox79 on September 15, 2009 at 11:28 PM

ya2daup on September 15, 2009 at 11:02 PM

As a person who has lots of experience running raps, prints, court dockets, and public records, you have to be careful. I know it may seem like certain names are unusual and unique but they rarely are.

GrannyDee on September 15, 2009 at 10:56 PM

I agree. I can’t imagine anyone in acorn would deliberately pretend they were pimps, prostitutes, and a murderess.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM

Wow. They are really nuts over at LGF…

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 7:57 PM

I’m new here, so I gotta ask: if they’re starkers over at LGF and its (Jim) Jonesville, why go there at all? Replace the LGF link with one to BigGovernment and be done with it.

ya2daup on September 15, 2009 at 11:33 PM

ya2daup: if you are so inclined, you may want to look through the social security index and see if their are deaths under those names. But, of course, they won’t tell you the cause of death and won’t be listed if no one claimed the $240 death benefit.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:35 PM

As much as I think the lady is lying about “playing along”, it makes you wonder why she would be so stupid to admit to murder basically. Admit that to two strangers.

But Id like to believe that O’Keefe and his partner wouldnt be dumb enough to pass it off as 100 percent real, if it isnt. They’d have to understand what a blow that would be to everything theyve already done and a blow to conervatives in general. If it proved to be fake, the media would all of a sudden wake up and then theyd report on it. It would be a disaster for us.

bucsox79 on September 15, 2009 at 11:35 PM

GrannyDee on September 15, 2009 at 10:56 PM

Tweekers are always in denial, and they specialize in lying…

lovingmyUSA on September 15, 2009 at 11:36 PM

IF these journalists are faking the tapes, then shame on them. They are as bad as any of the media these days.

I’m still assuming this is authentic.

AnninCA on September 15, 2009 at 11:37 PM

I’m new here, so I gotta ask: if they’re starkers over at LGF and its (Jim) Jonesville, why go there at all? Replace the LGF link with one to BigGovernment and be done with it.

ya2daup on September 15, 2009 at 11:33 PM

First, they weren’t always nuts. Second, there is currently a lot of talk that they are attacking everyone and I wanted to read it for myself. And, last, it’s not my blog and not my decision who to link or de-link.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:38 PM

IF these journalists are faking the tapes, then shame on them. They are as bad as any of the media these days.

I’m still assuming this is authentic.

AnninCA on September 15, 2009 at 11:37 PM

As usual, you’re full of $h*te.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:39 PM

KAELKE, RONALD PETITIONER RONALD & BEVERLY KAELKE DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE BFLBS05113 08/30/2000
KAELKE, RONALD Restrained Person TRESA KAELKE -V- RONALD KAELKE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WITH CHILDREN FAMBS700373 11/16/2007
KAELKE, RONALD C Protected Person RONALD C KAELKE -V- TRESA M KAELKE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WITH CHILDREN FAMBS800189 04/30/2008
KAELKE, TRESA Protected Person TRESA KAELKE -V- RONALD KAELKE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WITH CHILDREN FAMBS700373 11/16/2007
KAELKE, TRESA M Restrained Person RONALD C KAELKE -V- TRESA M KAELKE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WITH CHILDREN FAMBS800189 04/30/2008

ace tomato on September 15, 2009 at 11:40 PM

Breitbart did do a full lexis / nexis search on the alleged incident I hope????

phreshone on September 15, 2009 at 10:38 PM

Who cares? He’s not making the allegation — the woman herself is.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:41 PM

OSC RE: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
07/14/2008 – 9:00 AM DEPT. B3

MIRIAM I. MORTON PRESIDING.
CLERK: APRIL MARCUM
COURT REPORTER CATHY ALBRITTON CATHY ALBRITTON
BAILIFF: JANET HALTERMAN
-
APPEARANCES:
PLAINTIFF RONALD C KAELKE PRESENT
PARTIES NOT PRESENT: TRESA M KAELKE
-
PROCEEDINGS:
ACTION CAME ON FOR OSC RE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
OSC/MOTION HELD.
TRESA MARIE KAELKE IS ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED FROM
HARASS, ATTACK, STRIKE, THREATEN, ASSAULT (SEXUALLY OR OTHERWISE), HIT, FOLLOW, STALK, MOLEST, DESTROY PERSONAL PROPERTY, DISTURB THE PEACE, KEEP UNDER SURVEILLANCE, OR BLOCK MOVEMENTS.
HARASS, ATTACK, STRIKE, THREATEN, ASSAULT (SEXUALLY OR OTHERWISE), HIT, FOLLOW, STALK, MOLEST, DESTROY PERSONAL PROPERTY, DISTRUB THE PEACE, KEEP UNDER SURVEILLANCE, OR BLOCK MOVEMENTS.
CONTACT (EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY), OR TELEPHONE, OR SEND MESSAGES OR E-MAIL
TAKE ANY ACTION, DIRECTLY OR THROUGH OTHERS, TO GET THE ADDRESSES OR LOCATION OF ANY PROTECTED PERSONS OR OF THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS, CARETAKERS, OR GUARDIANS.
TRESA M KAELKE IS ORDERED TO STAY AWAY AT LEAST 100 YARDS FROM RONALD KAELKE
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER’S RESIDENCE
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER’S VEHICLE.
A.A. MEETINGS AND NEWBERRY SPRINGS SENIOR CENTER.
THE PROTECTED PERSON MAY RECORD ANY PROHIBITED COMMUNICATIONS MADE TO HIM OR HER BY THE RESTRAINED PERSON.
THIS ORDER SHALL EXPIRE AT MIDNIGHT ON 07/14/11
COMPLAINT STAGE AT DISPOSITION — JUDGMENT BEFORE HEARING. (FL)
DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT BEFORE HEARING. (FL)
ACTION – COMPLETE
=== MINUTE ORDER END ===

ace tomato on September 15, 2009 at 11:41 PM

not sure what this case is, but it’s from her criminal record

Case FVI05722 Defendant 96745 KAELKE, TRESA MARIE

Arrest Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Date Plea Status
1 PC CRIMINAL Z CRIMINAL BAIL 12/31/1996

ace tomato on September 15, 2009 at 11:45 PM

Who cares? He’s not making the allegation — the woman herself is.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:41 PM

Exactly.

the_nile on September 15, 2009 at 11:47 PM

Ace tomato: what state is that in?

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:55 PM

Who cares? He’s not making the allegation — the woman herself is.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:41 PM

Exactly.

the_nile on September 15, 2009 at 11:47 PM

Well let’s assume it wasn’t true. What, they weren’t supposed to run with the footage? And what if the MSM decides this is the point they want to jump in and set the record straight. Don’t you think that’s going to look bad on them…..oh this is important but the whole underlying scandal doesn’t deserve a few minutes? Maybe they want someone to jump on that, after all it wasn’t them that made the claim.

Still, I think this might be against the majority opinion here but I don’t see this as the blockbuster it was hyped to be. I think it’s a big deal that you had co-workers working with these 2 so openly. They had no fears of recrimination from their peers and that told you the structure encourages corruption. I know there were rumors of a connection to a Senator but that just looks like a moonbat running her mouth.

I don’t say that to rip on these guys. What they have done has been the most significant piece of journalism in a long time and they deserve all the praise that comes their way. I just don’t see this as being any more damning than the earlier ones, as it was being spun. At least not as of yet…we all know there is more coming. Drip, drip, drip.

stldave on September 15, 2009 at 11:58 PM

These journalists are not faking the tapes, imo. There is way too much thought in these, right down to the release of them. Of course, I could be werong. If I were interviewing the journalists I would have to ask how they came up with the idea of underage prostitution and sex slavery.
WE all know ACORN is bad news but never in my wildest dreams would I guess that these people are encouraging this kind of depravity.

ORconservative on September 15, 2009 at 11:59 PM

Dueling restraining orders: She got one against him in 2007 and he got one against her in 2008. Again, there is no way of being certain without more info that this is the person in question.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:59 PM

ya2daup on September 15, 2009 at 11:02 PM

As a person who has lots of experience running raps, prints, court dockets, and public records, you have to be careful. I know it may seem like certain names are unusual and unique but they rarely are.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM

I understand and agree about names and whether they’re unique and/or unusual. More often than not the problem is misspelling (and how might someone have done it) in my experience searching through genealogical records.

The key point I wanted to communicate was the birth and death of the son, which was overlooked/misunderstood on Hannity’s site when I visited there.

What I found and reported was confined to California and I did not delve into court records (I’ll leave that to more experienced folks).

ya2daup on September 16, 2009 at 12:04 AM

Dueling restraining orders: She got one against him in 2007 and he got one against her in 2008. Again, there is no way of being certain without more info that this is the person in question.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:59 PM

Trying to parse out the real story about this broad, or her dead Hubby’s life is a tail chase at the very least, and essentially pointless. All this vid does is illuminate what a lying, criminal POS she is, and that she’s the type that ACORN seeks and uses.

paragon27x on September 16, 2009 at 12:15 AM

California. She has been married and divorced twice:

California Marriage Index, 1960-1985
about Tresa M Parten
Name: Tresa M Parten
Age: 35
Est. Birth: abt 1948
Spouse Name: Donald C Kaelke
Spouse Age: 40
Est. Spouse Birth: abt 1943
Date: 5 Nov 1983
Location: Los Angeles

California Marriage Index, 1960-1985
about Tresa M Parten
Name: Tresa M Parten
Age: 15
Est. Birth: abt 1949
Spouse Name: Duane A Berhow
Spouse Age: 18
Est. Spouse Birth: abt 1946
Date: 4 Jul 1964
Location: Los Angeles

California Marriage Index, 1960-1985
about Tresa M Berhow
Name: Tresa M Berhow
Age: 35
Est. Birth: abt 1948
Spouse Name: Ronald C Kaelke
Spouse Age: 40
Est. Spouse Birth: abt 1943
Date: 5 Nov 1983
Location: Los Angeles

California Divorce Index, 1966-1984
about Duane A Berhow
Name: Duane A Berhow
Spouse Name: Tresa M Parten
Location: Los Angeles
Date: Apr 1974

ace tomato on September 16, 2009 at 12:16 AM

ya2daup: if you are so inclined, you may want to look through the social security index and see if their are deaths under those names.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:35 PM

No hits in the SSDI for any Burlow (or Barlow) male dying in CA and no hits for Kaelke, Donald (or Ronald).

ya2daup on September 16, 2009 at 12:16 AM

ya2daup on September 16, 2009 at 12:04 AM

The judge is out of SanBerdoo, so I will assume this is her.

Blake on September 16, 2009 at 12:18 AM

For me, the most telling thing was her mistake and poor correction about “bleeding hearts” being conservatives….

Politics mean nothing to that whore…. cash on the barrel head is all that matters.

paragon27x on September 16, 2009 at 12:20 AM

the Donald/Ronald thing is either a typo or a child. Turns out Tresa had a son who died – Duane Berhow. No idea how he died. You know the joke I’m not making right now . . .

ace tomato on September 16, 2009 at 12:21 AM

Ace tomato: what state is that in?

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:55 PM

And what county?

ya2daup on September 16, 2009 at 12:23 AM

Lots of right wing liberals? (4:32) What an imbecile. I bet this douche never graduated third grade.

Geronimo on September 16, 2009 at 12:26 AM

The records I’m finding on Tresa Parten/Berhow/Kaelke are so far from San Bernadino and Los Angeles Counties.

I’m going to tool around some lesser known databases. It looks like the criminal history of domestic violence and marriage records are making the rounds on other blogs. I am definitely not the only infosleuth on the job tonight =)

Btw: heard CBS/Couric FINALLY reported on Acorn tonight. Don’t know if they were inspired by the mounting information or John Stewart. Guess Stewart won’t be invited to Couric’s holiday parties since he let the acorn out of the bag.

ace tomato on September 16, 2009 at 12:31 AM

Something tells me this wackadoo video was shown to get the ACORN sympathizers all excited about how the might have an out…

and then…

BAM, Breitbart, Giles and O’Keefe hit em hard with something none of us see coming.

uknowmorethanme on September 16, 2009 at 12:37 AM

ace tomato on September 15, 2009 at 11:41 PM

01/25/2008 GAAS:35:08 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Governor Schwarzenegger Appoints Miriam Morton to San Bernardino County Superior Court

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger today announced the appointment of Miriam Ivy Morton to a judgeship in the San Bernardino County Superior Court.

Dotting i’s and crossing t’s

ya2daup on September 16, 2009 at 12:37 AM

Getting weirder by the minute. Tresa Kraeke has two sons that died:

Name: Michael Lee Berhow
Social Security #: xxxxxxxxx
Sex: MALE
Birth Date: 24 Jul 1971
Birthplace: California
Death Date: 23 Jul 1989 [18 years old]
Death Place: San Bernardino
Mother’s Maiden Name: Parten

Name: Duane Allen Berhow
Social Security #: xxxxxxxxx
Sex: MALE
Birth Date: 28 Nov 1964
Birthplace: California
Death Date: 28 Sep 1992 [28 years old]
Death Place: San Bernardino
Mother’s Maiden Name: Parten

Looking for cause of death info . . .

ace tomato on September 16, 2009 at 12:37 AM

Who cares if she killed someone or not? It is irrelevant.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 6:56 PM

Glad to see you gave up the idea that whether or not she killed her husband is irrelevant. It only took from page 7 to page 9 before you decided to jump in on a back ground check. Good for you.

Other than that who’s really the idiot ahole? Quit talking out both sides of your mouth.

Gang-of-One on September 16, 2009 at 12:43 AM

ace tomato on September 15, 2009 at 11:45 PM

The “pc” charge is possession of controlled substance. She was charged in 1997 and had a warrant for her arrest until 2008.

ACORN filed a police report to have them check out the “alledged” homicide…………

http://speakmymindblog.com/2009/09/16/acorn-san-bernardino-response-just-playing-along/

sherryande on September 16, 2009 at 12:48 AM

Who cares if she killed someone or not? It is irrelevant.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 6:56 PM

If you’re starting up a sh^t storm like this, you better know the real story so you don’t get blindsided (as I assume Breitbart & crew did). Especially when you know the MSM will use any excuse to bury/spin the story

phreshone on September 16, 2009 at 12:54 AM

The “pc” charge is possession of controlled substance. She was charged in 1997 and had a warrant for her arrest until 2008.

Thank you – I don’t usually dig around California and thought PC was penal code.

ace tomato on September 16, 2009 at 12:56 AM

Who cares if she killed someone or not? It is irrelevant.

Well it’s just something to check out. I don’t think being full of crap to close a deal is considered a viable defense when you are advocating tax evasion and supporting a plan to engage in child prostitution. I could be wrong – it IS California, but I’m betting that wouldn’t get anyone off the hook with the IRS.
If this was just one wacky acorn employee it could be swept under the rug as a singular kook. But it’s not just this one lady.
All criminal backgrounds of Acorn workers are relevant now.

ace tomato on September 16, 2009 at 1:00 AM

That’s what I thought at first too – I had to ask an unsavory friend ;o)

sherryande on September 16, 2009 at 1:02 AM

Schur’s statements follow comments from ACORN office supervisor Christina Spach, who said Kaelke was afraid of the “pimp” and “prostitute” who broached the prostitution ploy at ACORN’s San Bernardino office.
———————————————————–

AFRAID…. there was another man sitting there the whole time listening to everything.

.

ms on September 16, 2009 at 1:03 AM

it’s official, I’ve confused myself on where I am posting !

Apologies if some of my posts are erratic. I will slow down now.

ace tomato on September 16, 2009 at 1:06 AM

I’ve misspelled some names (it’s too late to be doing this). Here are the corrections.

ya2daup on September 15, 2009 at 11:02 PM

Residences of Duane A Berlow Berhow (unclear whether father or son)

I found no California public records regarding the deaths of either Duane A. Barhow Berhow, Sr. or Donald C. Kaelke.

ya2daup: if you are so inclined, you may want to look through the social security index and see if their are deaths under those names.

Blake on September 15, 2009 at 11:35 PM

No hits in the SSDI for any Burlow (or Barlow) male dying in CA and no hits for Kaelke, Donald (or Ronald).

ya2daup on September 16, 2009 at 12:16 AM

When I searched the SSDI for Berhow, I came up with:

Name: Berhow, D A; SSN: 561-19-9952
Born: 28-Nov-1964; Died: Sep-1992
State (Year) SSN issued: California (1972)

This is the first child and son from the Parten = Berhow marriage. The pay-to-view public database of California births shows that there also were two daughters and another son (born between 1965 and 1973) from this marriage.

ya2daup on September 16, 2009 at 1:11 AM

ace tomato on September 16, 2009 at 1:06 AM

There’s just too much coming in at once………….we’ve been getting hit from every angle – wouldn’t it be nice if we could count on our government and media to do their jobs so we didn’t have to……..

sherryande on September 16, 2009 at 1:13 AM

The “pc” charge is possession of controlled substance. She was charged in 1997 and had a warrant for her arrest until 2008.
———————-
Can you find out when she was hired?

Why did ACORN hire someone with a warrant for their arrest?

What caused the warrant to drop in 2008?

.

ms on September 16, 2009 at 1:22 AM

paragon27x on September 16, 2009 at 12:15 AM

Trying to parse out the real story about this broad, or her dead Hubby’s life is a tail chase at the very least, and essentially pointless.

I don’t agree. If she didn’t kill a husband, she’s an amoral, lying POS. If she’s got a criminal record and/or restraining orders for domestic issues, it would help to know about them to head off any “poor, poor pitiful Tresa” sob stories.

All this vid does is illuminate what a lying, criminal POS she is, and that she’s the type that ACORN seeks and uses.

No argument from me regarding ACORN’s lofty hiring standards.

ya2daup on September 16, 2009 at 1:22 AM

Looking for cause of death info . . .

ace tomato on September 16, 2009 at 12:37 AM

Unless you find newspaper articles or obituaries, you’d have to purchase copies of the death certificates from CA. Cost is about $20 each and turnaround time in my experience is at least four weeks.

ya2daup on September 16, 2009 at 1:27 AM

Did anyone already post this?

Acornofinlandempire’s Blog
Source: acornofinlandempire.wordpress.com
Members Michael and Dennis of the San Bernardino ACORN along with Tresa Kaelke (San Bernardino ACORN Community Organizer) and Christina Spach (California Field Corrdinator); attended the schedule meeting with California State Senator Gloria Negrete McLeod of District 32.

ace tomato on September 16, 2009 at 1:35 AM

ACORN Co-founder defends Group’s Integrity

http://www.biggovernment.com

ms on September 16, 2009 at 1:38 AM

There’s just too much coming in at once………….we’ve been getting hit from every angle – wouldn’t it be nice if we could count on our government and media to do their jobs so we didn’t have to……..

sherryande on September 16, 2009 at 1:13 AM

Agreed.

What is outrageous about this and shows the state-run media (SRM) in the worst light is that digging up the info isn’t hard to do. It’s not related to my regular job (nor, I suspect, the job of nearly all the others doing this right now), but it is time consuming.

On a shoestring budget O’Keefe and Giles brought to light more evidence of corruption than the SRM found in nearly three years. When the knee-walking turkeys in the SRM lose their cushy jobs and can no longer prime The Precedent’s pump at every opportunity, our shouted response to their whining will be, “Tough luck! Now go find yourself a job where you actually have to work!”

ya2daup on September 16, 2009 at 1:45 AM

Wow. Jon Stewart on the Daily Show is really ripping into the MSM and ACORN over this whole pimp/ho thing. Pretty thorough thrashing, actually.

Makes this (ACORN thanks Jon Stewart) that much funnier.

Of course, he’s still a douchebag for what he said about the 9/12 DC protesters.

JoelD on September 16, 2009 at 1:52 AM

Obama is going on Univision? That is Spanish language right? Do they know about the attempted Latina slave trade his pet organization is willing to set up for people?

Maybe someone should clue them in. They might be the ones who could ask the tough questions. My guess is Obama’s current stance of making sure illegals are not eligible is not sitting well… and importing young girls to service men? Yeah that should make a few people explode.

petunia on September 16, 2009 at 1:55 AM

ms on September 16, 2009 at 1:22 AM

I haven’t found anything yet. The earliest I’ve found is November 2008 when she was driving people to vote.

She was originally arrested in 1997 with a bail of $25,000 (so she had a good amount of drugs).

She was put on probation and entered into an alcohol program in 1999. It appears she didn’t follow through on the probation and a warrant was issued.

I can’t tell from the online records how this came back up – whether she turned herself in or got picked up.

5/6/08 she was re-arraigned and the warrant was recalled.
6/2/08 her probation was terminated.

sherryande on September 16, 2009 at 1:59 AM

Glad to see you gave up the idea that whether or not she killed her husband is irrelevant. It only took from page 7 to page 9 before you decided to jump in on a back ground check. Good for you.

You have to be one of the dumbest and most dishonest a-holes that has posted here in along time.

Other than that who’s really the idiot ahole? Quit talking out both sides of your mouth.

Gang-of-One on September 16, 2009 at 12:43 AM

You are. Quit making $h*te up.

Blake on September 16, 2009 at 2:28 AM

ACORN filed a police report to have them check out the “alledged” homicide…………

http://speakmymindblog.com/2009/09/16/acorn-san-bernardino-response-just-playing-along/

sherryande on September 16, 2009 at 12:48 AM

That’s interesting. ACORN claims she was just playing along but they were concerned enough about her weird story to file a police report. Hmmmm I need to compute that for a while something seems in consistent about that.

petunia on September 16, 2009 at 2:30 AM

She did not say she shot him in California.

I can see the advantage of setting up the history in one state, and luring the victim to a vacation sight, say Las Vegas, and killing him there. The police are less likely to interview the neighbors, to confirm the background.

Slowburn on September 16, 2009 at 2:31 AM

If you’re starting up a sh^t storm like this, you better know the real story so you don’t get blindsided (as I assume Breitbart & crew did). Especially when you know the MSM will use any excuse to bury/spin the story

phreshone on September 16, 2009 at 12:54 AM

Once, again, it’s irrelevant. She is the one who said on tape that she killed someone. Either she’s telling the truth or she lied. No one sought out to prove she was a murderess. IOW, it’s entirely her problem. They only wanted to show that acorn encourages people to commit fraud.

Blake on September 16, 2009 at 2:34 AM

Gang-of-One on September 16, 2009 at 12:43 AM

And jackass, don’t you ever edit and repost out of context one of my comments again.

Blake on September 16, 2009 at 2:42 AM

http://hotairpundit.blogspot.com/2009/09/san-bernadino-police-pay-visit-to-woman.html

A San Bernardino woman Tuesday was caught up in a national controversy surrounding the community organizing group ACORN when she appeared on a hidden-camera video bragging about killing her husband.

ACORN employee Tresa Kaelke is shown meeting with them, telling them that she once was an escort and got away with killing her husband. But Kaelke insisted Tuesday she made up her story for shock value. ACORN’s San Bernardino office occupies an otherwise vacant two-story office building on North D Street.

Kaelke was at the office Tuesday afternoon, but ACORN officials would not let her speak to a reporter. Since she claimed on the video to have killed her husband, two San Bernardino police homicide detectives interviewed her at the office Tuesday.

Police said they have been in contact with Kaelke’s former husbands and the homicide claims do not appear accurate. “At this point, we can’t prove that there’s anything to her statement,” said San Bernardino police Sgt. Dave Dillon. “We can’t show that ever happened.” One of her ex-husbands, Ronald Kaelke, 66, of Newberry Springs, said he was unaware of any investigation or that his ex-wife had made any claims of murder.

The couple divorced in 1987, but attempted to reconcile and lived together from 2002 to 2005, Ronald Kaelke said in a telephone interview. In 2007, the couple traded allegations of domestic violence and received separate restraining orders against each other, he said.
“As far as her murdering an ex-husband, that’s news to me,” Ronald Kaelke said. “She’s definitely got problems and goes off the wall sometimes.”

ms on September 16, 2009 at 2:48 AM

Comment pages: 1 7 8 9 10