Unbelievable: Maryland may prosecute O’Keefe for shooting ACORN video

posted at 8:23 pm on September 11, 2009 by Allahpundit

No word on whether they’ll be prosecuting any ACORN people for conspiring to cover up sex slavery. They’ve got bigger fish to fry, I guess. Like … the people who exposed the people who conspired to cover up sex slavery.

This is what you get for doing the media’s job for them.

STATEMENT OF STATE’S ATTORNEYS OFFICE FOR BALTIMORE CITY RELATIVE TO THE ALLEGED BALTIMORE ACORN INCIDENT

Baltimore, MD – September 11, 2009 – We have received inquiries from citizens and the media asking whether the Baltimore City State’s Attorneys Office would initiate a criminal investigation for acts allegedly committed at ACORN offices located in Baltimore. The only information received in reference to this alleged criminal behavior was a YouTube video. Upon review by this office, the video appears to be incomplete. In addition, the audio portion could possibly have been obtained in violation of Maryland Law, Annotated Code of Maryland Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article §10-402, which requires two party consent.

If it is determined that the audio portion now being heard on YouTube was illegally obtained, it is also illegal under Maryland Law to willfully use or willfully disclose the content of said audio. The penalty for the unlawful interception, disclosure or use of it is a felony punishable up to 5 years.

Note: Most of the “inquiries” they received from citizens — although perhaps not from reporters — surely were demands that ACORN be prosecuted. So they looked at the tape … and decided to go after O’Keefe instead. The news story at the link reminds us that they went after Linda Tripp for wiretapping too, coincidentally another person who made life uncomfortable for a Democratic president. Here’s the statute. You’ll find exception after exception provided for law enforcement to shield them from liability when they tape criminals surreptitiously to serve the public interest. Kind of like how O’Keefe did here.

I’m torn between hoping they drop this so that he doesn’t go to jail and hoping that they don’t because it’ll make him a conservative cause celebre and throw a giant spotlight on ACORN’s filthiness. Exit question: What should we hope for?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Exit question: What should we hope for?

Much like the results of the 2008 election, I figure it’s all good. While I was terrfied of Obama winning the election, I figured it would be a defining crucible for the conservative movement, and I think this belief is being vindicated. Likewise, I have faith that things will play out in a best-of-all-possible-worlds kind of way.

Faith, baby. We shall overcome.

disa on September 11, 2009 at 10:27 PM

I agree with Rush. It’s time for Obama to resign.

Dave R. on September 11, 2009 at 10:28 PM

Exit question: What should we hope for?

Trial by THUNDERDOME!

CPL 310 on September 11, 2009 at 10:28 PM

Comic relief. Not that we need any.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO2eh6f5Go0
It’s sort of gay in a strange weird way.

JellyToast on September 11, 2009 at 10:10 PM

Another good vid, similar in content, without teh ghey.

bikermailman on September 11, 2009 at 10:28 PM

That is my solution to everything, though.

CPL 310 on September 11, 2009 at 10:29 PM

I just read the statute and the preceding section which provides definitions.

Wow! This statute puts the kibosh on ANY investigative journalism! So, just you try to find out about AND expose another Spiro Agnew or other crooked government official in Maryland.

Does anyone know if there are similar statutes in other states?

[It's too bad all the comments can't be set out on a single page to allow for searching of the comments.]

Ira on September 11, 2009 at 10:30 PM

I’ve read some earlier comments on this thread saying O’Keefe and his helper will be OK because THEY knew the recording was happening, so ONE of the 2 parties knew…but remember Linda Tripp? She secretly recorded telephone calls with Lewinsky and faced prosecution for it. I don’t suppose to know the intricacies of the law here in Maryland but I DO think they broke that law and I’m worried as to what will happen to them.

Red State State of Mind on September 11, 2009 at 10:31 PM

ACORN conspires to cover-up sex slavery, defraud the IRS and banks all while using federal tax dollars. Why is it that no one in Maryland’s state atty office were investigating ACORN?

Culture of Corruption indeed!

TN Mom on September 11, 2009 at 10:31 PM

I’ve read some earlier comments on this thread saying O’Keefe and his helper will be OK because THEY knew the recording was happening, so ONE of the 2 parties knew…but remember Linda Tripp? She secretly recorded telephone calls with Lewinsky and faced prosecution for it. I don’t suppose to know the intricacies of the law here in Maryland but I DO think they broke that law and I’m worried as to what will happen to them.

Red State State of Mind on September 11, 2009 at 10:31 PM

Depends on the state. Some states, Texas is one, only one of the parties to a conversation have to know it’s being recorded. From what I’ve seen, MD requires both parties to be aware it’s being recorded.

bikermailman on September 11, 2009 at 10:33 PM

Is this anything like Islamic law where the girl who get’s raped is stoned to death because she was attractive and that is what caused the man to rape her?

RobertInLexington on September 11, 2009 at 10:34 PM

For the record, a search of contributions on the FEC website shows that this Baltimore City State’s Attorney gave Obama $1000 last year.

CP on September 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM

BINGO!!!!!

Topsecretk9 on September 11, 2009 at 10:34 PM

When all else fails, arrest the complainant.

gbear on September 11, 2009 at 10:35 PM

DO NOT LET HIM GO TO JAIL.

This guy was exposing child-sex-slavery enablers! HOW FREAKING DENSE CAN YOU GET??

Seriously, GREAT SCOTT. This is a massively egregious cover action.

Black Yoshi on September 11, 2009 at 10:37 PM

Exit question: What should we hope for?

This is going nowhere… office space accessible to public = no reasonable expectation of privacy…

elgeneralisimo on September 11, 2009 at 10:38 PM

My informal opinion is that the word “intercept” is the key word. Unless someone intercepts something, there can be no violation. So what exactly does “intercept” mean?

Has an appellate court issued an opinion stating the meaning? If not, then this is a case of first impression. If they charged him, his attorney could take the first adverse ruling to the Supreme Court of Maryland to find out what it means.

I do not see how anyone can intercept something that he/she is creating. Intercept seems to be a word that would apply to a third person not creating the communication.

So I disagree with the idiot official who stated that it might be a violation of Maryland law. An attorney who would render a written opinion about the law based on a videotape (that he/she also said appears to be incomplete) should be hauled in front of a Bar Grievance committee.

These two should join up with that woman who keeps stinging Planned Parenthood. They could be infamous.

platypus on September 11, 2009 at 10:39 PM

Shooting the messenger.

Our problem is we are not shooting enough messengers.
- Vladimir Maryland Lenin

MB4 on September 11, 2009 at 10:45 PM

Exit question: What should we hope for?

Bring. It. On.

I’ll write a check and I’m sure I won’t be alone. James and Hannah are my new 2 favorite people.

Pablo on September 11, 2009 at 10:45 PM

Yes, intercept is key.

According to Maryland Statute §10-401(3):

“Intercept” means the aural or other acquisition of the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device.

Ira on September 11, 2009 at 10:46 PM

They do it so its criminal, if Dan Rather did it they’d be trying to push him as god of all media (well if he did it to Republican cause)

Rbastid on September 11, 2009 at 10:46 PM

Revolution?

HumblyRight on September 11, 2009 at 10:46 PM

For the record, a search of contributions on the FEC website shows that this Baltimore City State’s Attorney gave Obama $1000 last year.

CP on September 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM
BINGO!!!!!

As with all things political, follow the money trail!

College Prof on September 11, 2009 at 10:52 PM

We have to remin d those with an imagination that the recording was not on the telephone. it was video. It is the same cell phone that records most of youtube and townhakll eruptions. The only cases of video troubles are cases of naked pics being sent without permission. A teacher sendin naked pics of herself to a minor is a crime.

seven on September 11, 2009 at 10:52 PM

Jesus H. Christ Think about this:
We were one tax avoision case away from President Spiro T. Agnew!

Lanceman on September 11, 2009 at 9:38 PM

Shame, we missed out on having a president that turns into the funniest anagram ever.

Orange Doorhinge on September 11, 2009 at 10:53 PM

Private Pyle, you have got to be sh**ting me!!

JohnGalt23 on September 11, 2009 at 10:54 PM

Faith, baby. We shall overcome.

disa on September 11, 2009 at 10:27 PM

Pray like everything depends on it.

Then work like everything depends on it.

Chaz706 on September 11, 2009 at 10:57 PM

For whomever of our non-troll HA posters are going to DC tomorrow for the March, I hope I get to meet some of you in person. I have no idea where I am going as I have never been there before and I am going with my friend who organized the bus.

I’ll be with the NJ (yuck-I live there) marchers and wearing my brown Reagan shirt, petite, blond hair & my name is Maria.

Hope I get to meet some of you as you all bring so much laughter and smiles to a sometimes dull life!

margategop517 on September 11, 2009 at 10:58 PM

Un-freaking-believable.

We will soon find out if O is just another hack politician or a real ideologue.

He should renounce thugs like these and repeal the stimulus (can you imagine what the market would do?) if he wants to retain an ounce of credibility. If he doubles down and ignores the rats and forces his bill, we know he is a wacko True Believer.

Either way, it’s gonna be ugly.

PattyJ on September 11, 2009 at 10:59 PM

Great, the AG went to Sidwell Friends and Yale.

barnone on September 11, 2009 at 11:01 PM

It is also a misdemeanor to use a hidden camera on private property “for purposes of conducting deliberate, surreptitious observation of a person inside the private residence,” or in a private place with “prurient intent.”

Md. Crim. Law §§ 3-901, -902, -903. A person who is viewed in violation of these statutes has a civil cause of action.

The court may award actual damages and reasonable attorney fees.

A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding one year or a fine not exceeding $2,500 or both.”

This is about peeping Tom’s.

It’s not a “private residence”, ACORN is publicly funded, and their building is our building.

“prurient intent”
marked by or arousing an immoderate or unwholesome interest or desire; especially : marked by, arousing, or appealing to sexual desire.

Unless the DA wants to explain why he gets a woody when talking about 13 year-old prostitutes, child sex slavery, why that “turns him on” I don’t think the prurient intent applies.

DSchoen on September 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM

So, do they arrest all “gotcha journalists” for “illegal recordings”? Or just ones who make Democratic Party favored groups look stupid?

Is asking this worrying about unequal treatment under the law?

Wait, I forgot; the “Freedom of the Press” clause means reporters don’t follow the same laws we do… according to them. So there is clearly unequal treatment under the law here; but there should be?

gekkobear on September 11, 2009 at 11:04 PM

b

ut remember Linda Tripp? She secretly recorded telephone calls with Lewinsky and faced prosecution for it.

And howd that turn out for president Clinton and the Dems?

DSchoen on September 11, 2009 at 11:06 PM

You morons in Maryland better turn that thought process around.
Wonder how many actual Ho Houses these people really did get help for. You government hacks should being going door to door looking for underage sex slaves, living in houses procured by ACORN!

hopefloats on September 11, 2009 at 11:08 PM

Bring. It. On.

I’ll write a check and I’m sure I won’t be alone. James and Hannah are my new 2 favorite people.

Pablo on September 11, 2009 at 10:45 PM

You’re damn straight you won’t be the only one. Just let me know the name of the defense fund and my check will be on the way.

Gator Country on September 11, 2009 at 11:15 PM

This is going nowhere… office space accessible to public = no reasonable expectation of privacy…
elgeneralisimo on September 11

Also note: that office space is paid for by the US Tax payers.

Are the US Tax payers allowed to Object to ACORNS “Pimps are Us”.

I would reallllly like to know why one of these women when it was clear they were talking about CHILD PROSTITUTION, didn’t excuse herself, get a phone and call the frigging COPS!

How many days ago was this filmed?
And no one at ACORN called the cops?
Are you blanking me!

DSchoen on September 11, 2009 at 11:16 PM

I’m going to break protocol here and go straight to triple dog dare! Ha! Take that mister Attorney General man!

TBinSTL on September 11, 2009 at 11:21 PM

Surely there is some prosecutorial discretion here. Would be interesting to see how this guy exercises his discretion and whether there is any pattern of it being politically motivated (abuse).

Firefly_76 on September 11, 2009 at 11:23 PM

Seriously, GREAT SCOTT. This is a massively egregious cover action.

Black Yoshi on September 11, 2009 at 10:37 PM

Well, yeah. But that is the new Amerika we live in. I expect it to get worse too, before it gets better. The inmates are running the asylum.

MikeA on September 11, 2009 at 11:24 PM

Heh, this is just what went on in the communist block during the 50′s & 60′s – I just the USSA is just warming up.

izoneguy on September 11, 2009 at 11:26 PM

Yes, since Obama was a former employee of ACORN let’s subpoena his ass.

izoneguy on September 11, 2009 at 11:27 PM

Anyone know who to contact in MD about this?? To complain?

reshas1 on September 11, 2009 at 11:28 PM

A prosecution like this would almost be a gift from God for the right.

chasnleo on September 11, 2009 at 11:29 PM

One more thing: I have not noticed a lot of trolls lately, have they ran out of legs to stand on and crawled off?

chasnleo on September 11, 2009 at 11:30 PM

Than we should bring charges against Baltimore’s States Attorney for:
Conspiring to allow Illegal sex trade within the state (i.e. Prostitution)
Conspiring to allow Human Trafficing
Conspiring to allow minors to engage in Illegal sex trade
Conspiring to allow undocumented immigrants into the state
Conspiring against Federal Government by the providing of falsified documents

BigMike252 on September 11, 2009 at 11:30 PM

Baltimore City State’s Attorney Patricia Jessamy can be reached at mail@stattorney.org or (410) 396-4001.

reshas1 on September 11, 2009 at 11:30 PM

For the record, a search of contributions on the FEC website shows that this Baltimore City State’s Attorney gave Obama $1000 last year.

CP on September 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM

Borrowing your post so that I can post it over at Michelle’s site, she just blogged about this. I’ll note to give you the credit for posting it here.

nwsseeker on September 11, 2009 at 11:32 PM

It’s not illegal to turn on a tape recorder. Ask Rodney King, or even anyone who’s filmed a baseball game from the stands.

What’s illegal (in Maryland) is to record someone without their knowledge for the purpose of bringing evidence before a court. (I think that law is stupid and a boon to criminals, but nevermind.)

What O’Keefe did was tape a conversation between himself and a paid representative of an organization with a legal personality, not for prosecutorial purposes but for distribution on YouTube in order to shine a light on is real.

My understanding (and I am not an attorney) is that his videos may not be admissable in court, but they are still an accurate depiction of reality and, for the state of Maryland to prosecute O’Keefe, they would have to show that he taped those conversations with intent to bring charges against them in a court of law.

Those who shot footage of the World Trade center 8 years ago could not be prosecuted for illegal taping since they filmed public events. ACORN is a legaly recognized organization, not a private individual. I’m no lawyer but I think I can argue that case successfully.

Tuning Spork on September 11, 2009 at 11:34 PM

Or not.

Tuning Spork on September 11, 2009 at 11:37 PM

What do we hope for?

JUSTICE! Let O’Keefe go free, let the pawns at Acorn go free and arrest Rathke…their leader.
Here are the morons that cooked this up:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4054553&mesg_id=4054666

njpat on September 11, 2009 at 11:40 PM

Is the picture embedded with the thread a picture of the ACORN worker caught in the video or a picture of Patricia Coats Jessamy, the State’s Attorney?

bayview on September 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM

The Democratic Party is a criminal enterprise that has control of numerous public officials, departments, and state and local governments.

Nobody really understands how bad the situation is – we still think we live in an open society because they don’t actually lean directly on most of us… they just rip us off of billions in our tax dollars, and brainwash us and our children through their media propaganda organs.

Unless something changes, in another 5-10 years, it will be too late, and they won’t have to bother covering it up even to the slight extent they have to now.

I hope I am not jumping the gun here, but if we manage to get control of the legislative branch and/or executive branch, we must demand that our elected officials clean house ruthlessly. GWB’s foolish attempts to govern with bipartisanship early on just allowed the Clintocrats to stay entrenched and nearly destroy his Presidency: the near creation of another Vietnam-like gut-shot to the American psyche was just gravy for them.

The endemic corruption in the US political class must be purged, and since the media won’t do it and the military dare not, that leaves it up to you and me, folks. If it doesn’t happen soon, it will either never happen, or it will happen violently.

Either do it in relative safety with your next vote, or you can wait to do it when your life and those of your families are at risk for it. That time will come sooner than we can imagine if we don’t answer the bell right now!

drunyan8315 on September 11, 2009 at 11:42 PM

Exit question: What should we hope for?
Bring. It. On.

I’ll write a check and I’m sure I won’t be alone. James and Hannah are my new 2 favorite people.

Pablo on September 11, 2009 at 10:45 PM

Mine too. Those kids are gutsy. And I’ll bet they and Breitbart have a few more arrows in their video quiver.

ddrintn on September 11, 2009 at 11:49 PM

WAIT, isn’t Biden’s son in law inforcement there? I see a pattern here.

njpat on September 11, 2009 at 11:49 PM

WAIT, isn’t Biden’s son in law inforcement there? I see a pattern here.

njpat on September 11, 2009 at 11:49 PM

I post confusing messages when I’m pissed….

Isn’t Biden’s son involved in law enforcement in Maryland?

njpat on September 11, 2009 at 11:52 PM

agree with Rush. It’s time for Obama to resign.

Dave R. on September 11, 2009 at 10:28 PM

Dave you must know by now that Democrats almost NEVER resign for what they do. Only when they have no other choice!

G. on September 11, 2009 at 11:57 PM

If memory serves me…Linda Tripp was prosecuted for breaking FCC laws. I can’t remember if VA law was invoked or not.

I am pretty much in agreement with all other postings…Bring It.

valianthunter on September 11, 2009 at 11:57 PM

Bring. It. On.

I’ll write a check and I’m sure I won’t be alone. James and Hannah are my new 2 favorite people.

Pablo on September 11, 2009 at 10:45 PM
You’re damn straight you won’t be the only one. Just let me know the name of the defense fund and my check will be on the way.

Gator Country on September 11, 2009 at 11:15 PM

It should NOT get to the point where charges are filed and these two young heroes need a check from you or anybody else.

I think the whole question of whether these two should be thrown into the meatgrinder of government persecution so that some “conservatives” can use them as a “cause celebre” is truly sick.

Instead of hoping that these brave kids get rolled, terrified and possibly jailed by our corrupt and souless Obamanation, let whoever is willing to stand on the sidelines and send a check, instead step up, do some civil disobedience of some sort, and be their own “cause celebre”.

The more I write the more angry and disgusted I get.
I guess I gave too much credit where it wasn’t due.

I don’t think coward is too strong a word for a fool like Allahundit and anyone who thinks like him.

With friends like you….

tigerlily on September 11, 2009 at 11:58 PM

And, we should be raising Cain to make sure that even the thought of bringing charges against these two wonderful people is UNACCEPTABLE!

tigerlily on September 12, 2009 at 12:01 AM

I want this guy fired. I’ve just e-mailed this story to everyone in my address book who matters. I usually have a long fuse, but this set off a very big bomb.

This will not stand.

RadClown on September 12, 2009 at 12:05 AM

i was havein a great day after i heard acorn would not be in the census now i see this crap..wonder whos laywer found it was two party consensuses??need to puke now…

ATEXAN on September 12, 2009 at 12:07 AM

Hahaha, Hannity just slipped up and called the girl in the video hot.

lavell12 on September 12, 2009 at 12:17 AM

Wait. What?

Making a recording, video or audio or both, by a journalist working undercover on a legitimate story exposing criminal activity inside of or directly connected to a BUSINESS, or even a non-profit BUSINESS enjoying full tax-payer funding alongside their generous tax exemption’s for that matter, is punishable by imprisonment?

I guess Maryland state’s entire local news network roster must be indictable then. They must have nearly ALL surely done some of that journalist undercover sting stuff themselves, or ‘Troubleshooter Undercover Reports’, at some point in time. Here in San Diego we have, at minimum, “10News On Your Side” and “Turko Files” who frequently go undercover gathering information and surreptitiously recording on video and audio people ripping people off. Then the payoff is the big ‘bust’ when the journalist undercover team contacts the target(s) on camera face-to-face for their ‘comments’ and ‘explanations’. The full and complete unedited video recordings are also turned over to the appropriate law enforcement agency’s for review and possible prosecution of those ‘target(s)’ if law enforcement requests them, or subpeona’s them if necessary, as evidence.

If Maryland journalists never ever have done that, well then, everything from auto repair con’s and ripoffs to contractor con’s and ripoff’s to real estate con’s and ripoff’s to slumlord’s … -etc ad nasueum- … must be a helluva booming business in the State of Maryland.

SilverStar830 on September 12, 2009 at 12:19 AM

Where’s all the guys from 60 minutes, Dateline etc. I’m still waiting for the fourth estate to defend the First Amendment.

Hey, ACLU! Does any of this bother you?

RadClown on September 12, 2009 at 12:19 AM

Remember, Maryland passed that “wiretapping” law because a bunch of Maryland Democrats were being caught up in a flurry of corruption scandals. In a one-party state, the best way to shield your buddies and their cronies is to make it illegal to record or tape them without their consent. That way, you can never record their voices when they ask for bribes or offer protection. If you have no recorded evidence, it’s all up to memory and the lawyers can then provide the needed cover.
Yes! The Old Line State has gone the extra mile to cover for the criminals. No evidence…no crime.
Maryland has the law on its side if it wants to prosecute the two who filmed the clip. Those two better lawyer up because those bastards in Baltimore and Annapolis can be relentless.

Problem solved.

shorebird on September 12, 2009 at 12:19 AM

This is who you are dealing with:

Baltimore City State’s Attorney Patricia Jessamy can be reached at mail@stattorney.org or (410) 396-4001.

http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/36loc/bcity/html/msa14094.html

PATRICIA COATS JESSAMY, State’s Attorney (Democrat)

The Cost of Failed Teamwork

http://www.steinershow.org/featured-topics/criminal-justice/cost-failed-teamwork

The public should not expect to get the truth out of this. The media needs to be careful about what it publishes.

But one fact it never published about the Jones case was how the State’s Attorney’s Office sabotaged any chance of success. On December 27, 2005, a prostitute alleged that Jones had raped her at the Southwestern police station after he had arrested her that day. When police investigators shared this allegation with the State’s Attorneys Office, prosecutors—not the police—secured an indictment from the Grand Jury on January 5, 2006, merely nine days after the allegation was made. That practically amounted to prosecutorial malpractice.

It’s notoriously difficult to convince juries of rape no matter who the victim and the defendant may be. For prosecutors to prove that a cop raped a prostitute? Only a careful investigation piecing together enough evidence to significantly support the victim’s story would give them a fighting chance.

When the story broke, police told Sun reporters that they had not yet investigated the case. Warren Brown, retained by Jones, claimed that the State’s Attorney’s Office was trying to embarrass the police department.

Right on both counts. The State’s Attorney’s Office, who could and should have assisted police investigators in putting together a solid case, instead halted any meaningful investigation by charging the case and then leaking what police documents they had to the media. When Jones’s trial attorney ridiculed the police investigation, prosecutor JoAnne Stanton could only respond with an irony lost on the jury, “Would I have liked a better investigated case? Absolutely.”

She absolutely had the chance to make that happen. She didn’t. Jones was acquitted, the criminal cases against two other officers dropped, and they all looked like victims.

So was it Stanton’s fault? I don’t think so. The fiasco had the fingerprints of Margaret T. Burns, spokesperson for State’s Attorney Patricia C. Jessamy, all over it. The interference with operational matters, the premature rush to charge a case that would embarrass the police department, the immediate and unethical leaking of documents– that was the Burns M.O. The harmful effects are still being felt by all of those involved.

If all of this was in the past, I wouldn’t bother to bring it up. But Burns and Jessamy are still at the helm of the prosecutor’s office. And they are still doing their thing. It’s quieter now, more subtle, because Police Commissioner Frederick Bealefeld and Sheryl Goldstein, who directs the Mayor’s Office on Criminal Justice, are too professional to fight. The wars of the O’Malley mayoral years are over, even if the damage continues to manifest itself. But Jessamy is no more a crime-fighting partner now than she was before.

izoneguy on September 12, 2009 at 12:19 AM

What should we hope for?

1. The coming military coup will sweep this aside -or-

2. O’Keefe goes to a safe GOP state like Texas or here in GA and if a request is received for extradition the governor tells Maryland to shove it up their Obama and has the official from Maryland arrested by the State Guard

3. Boycott Maryland

bill30097 on September 12, 2009 at 12:22 AM

Hey Allah,

Note the phrase: “…it is also illegal under Maryland Law to willfully use or willfully disclose the content of said audio.”

Unless I’m missing something, it appears the real agenda here is to go after — or at least threaten — Fox News for broadcasting it.

Heywood U. Reedmore on September 12, 2009 at 12:22 AM

Anyone starting a legal defense fund for O’Keefe?

I’d proudly throw a few buck in.

SuperCool on September 12, 2009 at 12:31 AM

The laws were put into place by crooked politicians to protect crooked politicians. ACORN is part of their inner circle and will be protected by their self-serving laws. We probably should start a legal defense fund for the two heroes of freedom, honesty and decency.

DL13 on September 12, 2009 at 12:34 AM

Trial by THUNDERDOME!

CPL 310 on September 11, 2009 at 10:28 PM

Damn, now I’ve got to clean my monitor and keyboard again and pick up all the paper that went flying. ROTFLMAO!!

belad on September 12, 2009 at 12:41 AM

Unless I’m missing something, it appears the real agenda here is to go after — or at least threaten — Fox News for broadcasting it.

Heywood U. Reedmore on September 12, 2009 at 12:22 AM

Maybe Fox News should be asking the Baltimore officials why they have failed to investigate acorn.

Johan Klaus on September 12, 2009 at 12:50 AM

We should hope O’Keefe has a bunch more videos of rotten ACORNs.

OooohBaMagoo, what have you done?

starboardhelm on September 12, 2009 at 12:51 AM

That is my solution to everything, though.

CPL 310 on September 11, 2009 at 10:29 PM

And why not? It’s a good solution.

TMK on September 12, 2009 at 12:53 AM

Jake Tapper’s story also has the embedded video. And he has this from the Census Bureau:

Buckner said recent videotapes posted on BigGovernment.com and broadcast on Fox News — showing a young man and young woman pretending to be a pimp and prostitute, declaring themselves such and apparently able to secure the help of ACORN employees in Washington D.C. , and Baltimore, in obtaining housing – was “the tipping point.”

There’s too much support out there now for this story. These two “crazy kids” are not going to be prosecuted. No way, no how.

Mr_Magoo on September 12, 2009 at 12:54 AM

Anyone starting a legal defense fund for O’Keefe?

I’d proudly throw a few buck in.

SuperCool on September 12, 2009 at 12:31 AM

Somehow I think Breitbart & Company have their backs one way or another.

Mr_Magoo on September 12, 2009 at 12:56 AM

Buckner said recent videotapes posted on BigGovernment.com and broadcast on Fox News

Hey! I can finally say I’m in favor of BigGovernment. It’s T-shirt time!

Mr_Magoo on September 12, 2009 at 12:57 AM

The b!tch framed me!

Christien on September 12, 2009 at 1:04 AM

Reading that article, it sounds like the person looking for creative ways to charge O’Keefe is using the same tactics ACORN used to call a prostitute an “entertainer”.
Has Maryland gone “NUTZ”…er…I mean “ACORN”?

OxyCon on September 12, 2009 at 1:11 AM

What should we hope for?

That they take the Black Cow out of the Bartender’s Bible?

infidel4life on September 12, 2009 at 1:54 AM

So stay out of Maryland for a while. Nobody’s gonna go for extradition.

mojo on September 12, 2009 at 1:59 AM

O’Keefe did us all a huge favor. It’s HIS call what we should hope for.

voxpopuli on September 12, 2009 at 2:24 AM

tigerlily on September 11, 2009 at 11:58 PM

They launched an offensive against the left, and a trial furthers our cause. If arrested they should wear it with pride, and use the trial as a soapbox to further chastise acorn, and the democraps in general.

Slowburn on September 12, 2009 at 3:27 AM

I post confusing messages when I’m pissed….
Isn’t Biden’s son involved in law enforcement in Maryland?
njpat on September 11

I think he is the assistant AG, but currently he is in the M.E. as part of JAG.
.

DSchoen on September 12, 2009 at 3:53 AM

Hahaha, Hannity just slipped up and called the girl in the video hot.

lavell12 on September 12, 2009 at 12:17 AM

I thought I heard him say that. Horndog. But he’s right.

BuckeyeSam on September 12, 2009 at 4:25 AM

Correct me if I’m wrong but doesn’t the statute say that if ONE of the parties (i.e. O’Keefe) knows and consents to the conversation being recorded than it IS legal?

rspock on September 12, 2009 at 4:52 AM

Clearly this is the sickest of crimes against children and our society and these people were actively engaged in not only allowing it, but in helping to set it up as if it were just business. Its just business for pushers who sell drugs that kill people and just business for those that abort babies, some of which must be born breach so that they can jam a pair of sissors into the base of the skull to insure that as the head leaves the mother the baby is dead and legally aborted. It is just business to protect those that push the change to socialism and punish those who get in the way, or embarass the ONE.

Did anyone catch that the women was posing as a prostitute and the man was posing as a politician who was going to running for an office? I guess that made it okay for them; politics as usual from where they look at it. What also needs to be noted is that the women who was brought in to help them with the tax situation was said to be really good at it. That can only strongly imply that there is a history there of previous crimes. Where is the investigation? They fired them but I bet if someone looked at them later, after they have milked the unemployment until it is dry, that they are hired on someplace eles in Acorn or one of its many affiliates.

In a related concern. Some of us may remember Obama saying that he wanted every school child to be forced to do 50-100 hours of community service. This was to be a mandatory government program, without parent input or supervision. I wondered who would be incharge and Acorn seemed to be the likely canidate. Just imagin who they would have supervising the children out of the sight and supervision of their parents. That part about sending the girls to school and making sure they keep their mouth shut should worry parents everywhere if Obama, Acorn or his people’s army, ever gets their hands on our children.

Franklyn on September 12, 2009 at 5:13 AM

Wonder how long, if ever, that Obama takes to makes a comment on this outting of his darling Acorn.

Franklyn on September 12, 2009 at 5:19 AM

Go for it Maryland… How much exposure of your partisan lies do you think the American people can stand? How big will the contract for James O’Keefe’s first TV show be?

DANEgerus on September 12, 2009 at 5:27 AM

I’m arriving late to the conversation, but since it’s basically been commmon knowledge that ACORN is corrupt–hundreds of thousands of fraudulent voter registrations, corruption investigations in 14 States, etc.–why the hell haven’t law enforcement officials, who are protected by the Maryland statute, already organized such a sting operation? I already know the answer to this question, mind you, but it’s the question that America needs to be asking. Contact your elected officials at every level, municipal to federal and everything in between, and demand that they investigate this criminal enterprise. Make them understand that they protect the Activist Criminal Offenders and Racketeers Network to their incumbent status’ peril.

schafkopf on September 12, 2009 at 6:17 AM

Exit question: What should we hope for?

No good deed goes unpunished.

This is the best example of investigative journalism we’ve seen in a long time. Did Woodward and Bernstein get prosecuted for watergate?

Keefe and Giles did a great job on this one. I hope they keep it up and others take notice.

ted c on September 12, 2009 at 6:17 AM

Wiretapping my foot….

tx2654 on September 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM

izoneguy on September 12, 2009 at 12:19 AM

Great. So the State’s Attorney for Baltimore City, Patricia Jessamy, is a corrupt, hyper-partisan Democrat. It’s Maryland, so I guess we shouldn’t be surprised.

What should we hope for? I hope Maryland voters will be outraged by this, and will inundate their governor and state representatives with complaints about Jessamy’s outrageous statement. I hope some prominent attorneys will step forward and offer their services for free to these kids. I hope there is loud public condemnation of ACORN and its enablers, including Jessamy. I hope the MSM will take their collective heads out of their rears and stop covering for this corrupt administration. I hope there is a groundswell of public indignation that ultimately results in ACORN being stripped of all taxpayer funding.

AZCoyote on September 12, 2009 at 6:26 AM

As much as I hate to say it, I don’t see how ACORN can be prosecuted from this tape. Since the “pimp and prostitute” were actors, there was no actual crime that the ACORN staff were abetting. If the actors were law enforcement, and if their actions could not be classified as entrapment then I think that ACORN could be nailed to the wall.

I don’t know if O’Keefe could be prosecuted or not, but to answer your question, he deserves an award of course, and I sincerely hope that he will not be legally harassed. Not even for the sake of more negative publicity for ACORN.

It makes me sick, but as rancid as ACORN is, I don’t see how they can be nailed by anything more than the publicity from these tapes.

MJBrutus on September 12, 2009 at 6:34 AM

Guess they ought to check if Chris Hansen of Dateline NBC has ever done one of his “To Catch a Predator” shows in Maryland too. This is ridiculous. What’s next? Go after Candid Camera or Ashton Kutcher for Punked?

Ronin11208 on September 12, 2009 at 6:45 AM

I’m sure this has been said in this thread but aren’t whistleblowers protected?

Conventional wisdom would tell us that any investigation into the group would open up a rat’s nest of corruption and criminal activity but it is my understanding that ACORN, being the criminals that they are, are already one step ahead in forming their org and all it’s satellite offices as separate entities. So while the group would be shown to smell to high heaven to those of us who already recognize the group for what it is, the hope that more would be revealed about the group as a whole is unlikely. By firing immediately, which was the right thing to do BTW, the employees involved, ACORN attempts to salvage it’s reputation with the ‘they operated independently’ excuse. It ‘s not us that need convincing, it’s the people that go into ACORN offices truly seeking assistance – and get it.

gopmom on September 12, 2009 at 6:49 AM

After beating any charges brought, O’Keefe needs to sic the Maryland State Bar on the DA in question — if Maryland has adopted ABA Rule 3.8 or something equivalent.

Rule 3.8 Special Responsibilities Of A Prosecutor

The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

(a) refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause; [...]

And O’Keefe’s attorney should make sure the DA knows that if he insists on pursuing a charge so obviously lacking in evidence for the essential element of criminal intent, he’ll do his best to Nifong the SOB and have his bar card.

Alex_SF on September 12, 2009 at 7:25 AM

Shine the light on the cockroaches…That is what happened, O’Keefe shined the light and the roaches are scurrying.
Take a look at what happens to whistle blowers, most every where, they are the ones vilified…except at our military campuses, where the best of the best are educated.

right2bright on September 12, 2009 at 7:27 AM

Nifong the SOB and have his bar card.

Alex_SF on September 12, 2009 at 7:25 AM

I like that…Nifong the SOB…

right2bright on September 12, 2009 at 7:27 AM

If he really wants to grease the skids and open up ACORN to even more scrutiny, he’s welcome to do so…I hope the Baltimore DA does go through with it…go ahead, all it will do is throw more light on ACORN’s illegal ways.

Dickie Dunn on September 12, 2009 at 7:28 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6