It’s come to this: Olbermann lectures Joe Wilson
posted at 9:47 pm on September 10, 2009 by Allahpundit
A very special comment indeed on the eve of 9/11 from a guy who thinks Fox News is “worse than Al Qaeda,” who regards any and all criticism of Barack Obama as thinly veiled racism, and who treats the veritable certainty that ObamaCare will eventually be extended to illegal immigrants as the height of paranoia. Not a single word uttered about the president’s assurance that our trillion-dollar health-care “experiment” will supposedly be deficit-neutral. It’s all about Joe Wilson, don’t you know.
You’re looking at the leading liberal light on American television here. This is the top of the food chain.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Darth Executor, have you written about your departure from the Left anyplace online?
OhioCoastie on September 10, 2009 at 11:31 PM
GE’s pockets are deep.
Limerick on September 10, 2009 at 11:31 PM
From 2001-2003? Find me a clip.
crr6 on September 10, 2009 at 11:32 PM
Beck is “mainstream” now? Get the story straight.
ddrintn on September 10, 2009 at 11:32 PM
His political views sure aren’t. But he’s on a major cable news channel and has significant pull among conservatives. Comparing his rhetoric now to a Dkos diarist’s back in 2000 is disingenuous.
crr6 on September 10, 2009 at 11:34 PM
I wish Mr. Oblabbermann would just go away. I truly hope to never ponder another moment on MSNBC while he is employed there.
TBenton on September 10, 2009 at 11:34 PM
From 2001-2003? Find me a clip.
crr6 on September 10, 2009 at 11:32 PM
No problem, crr6
Limerick on September 10, 2009 at 11:36 PM
If the sportscaster knew anything about medicine, he’d know that that stat means little. Why does MSNBC put him in “straight news” environments? Why does NBC Sports ruin my Sunday Night pregame with this asswipe?
toliver on September 10, 2009 at 11:36 PM
People who have advanced beyond the intelligence of a hamster didn’t call Bush a fascist or socialist in his first 2-3 years, because…. He wasn’t a fascist or socialist.
Obama… Nationalizing Car Companies, Health Care, Banks, and calling up his Union Thugs to suppress dissent. Hires communists and truthers to top advisory positions.
Why is Obama called a fascist… Cause he acts like one.
James on September 10, 2009 at 11:38 PM
That clip is from 2008. Try again.
crr6 on September 10, 2009 at 11:38 PM
I’m guessing Bill Moron on Politically a Reject doesn’t count…because….
sven10077 on September 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM
Bush never was a fascist. Neither is Obama. If he was you wouldn’t have the freedom to post here.
crr6 on September 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM
nah Keefe is a lot lighter there I’d say 1904 by his current girth.
sven10077 on September 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM
Bush didn’t fire the CEO of GM and didn’t propose taking over a huge chunk of the national economy. Tax cuts and the like aren’t all that “fascistic”, except in the minds of moonbats for whom ALL conservatives are “fascists”. And instances of that — along with “President Select” and variations on “We was robbed!” and “who paid off the Supreme Court” as well as pretty vile, pre-Palin personal attacks on Katherine Harris — are easily found from December 2000 up til the present.
That “Who, us???” bullsh1t just won’t get it. We remember.
ddrintn on September 10, 2009 at 11:40 PM
Apples and oranges. First, Bush, unlike Barry 0, was a popular president at the time with high approval rating. Second, he was dealing with an issue that was important to most Americans: a rogue dictator who supported terrorists and possessed WMD. So, yes, unlike Joe Wilson, who came out of this episode looking like the true patriot that he is, that fictitious heckler from 2003 would have been seen as just a liberal kook. BTW, Joe Wilson is raising lots and lots of money. And do you really think South Carolinians are going to vote for some fem Democrat in 2010?
WarEagle01 on September 10, 2009 at 11:40 PM
fishy@whitehouse.gov
give him time cutie pie he has to lay some groundwork first
sven10077 on September 10, 2009 at 11:40 PM
crr6…
It doesn’t happen overnight. Obama has an internet CZAR and wants to control the internet when in crisis mode.
Which he will determine to be anything he deems a crisis to his presidency.
James on September 10, 2009 at 11:41 PM
Count me in as a non-watcher. The sanctimony is too cringe inducing. Has he crossed into a parody of himself yet?
And is this goob still doing Sunday Night Football? I mean, if it wasn’t football, it’d almost be enough to not watch that either.
somewhatconcerned on September 10, 2009 at 11:41 PM
If Obama and his Kool-Aid drinkers could have their way, we WON’T be allowed to post here.
ddrintn on September 10, 2009 at 11:42 PM
crrap6 eats another crrap sandwich.
Beck isn’t a “Republican leader” any more than BathTub Boy is a ‘Demoratic leader’. Many leftist groups and their leaders were calling Bush a fascist and Hitler soon after Afghanistan heated up in Nov 2001.
The eff word was even tossed around before that. Crr6 is religiously Dumb; fanatically Dumb; Kool-Aid Dumb….
Janos Hunyadi on September 10, 2009 at 11:42 PM
Olbermann is a reasonably effective speaker. The problem is that he’s stupid.
Olbermann heaps the WMD fiasco on Bush, conveniently skipping the fact(s) that WMDs are a Clinton-era item, and they date back to 1994 or so. Plenty of time to get to the truth about WMDs, no? Yet EVERYONE had little doubt of WMD existence in Iraq as late as 19 January 2001. Who was saying different; Olbermann?
Olbermann seems unable to assemble 2 or more facts to form an argument, certainly not sentences one of which follows the other.
No care for illegal aliens? Perhaps the words are in there, but no matter; there is no provision to determine if a patient is a citizen, legally-admitted alien, or not. Atlanta was precluded from requiring ID for the 2008 elections. How well does employer verification of employee SSNs and other data work today? Even today, the police are frequently not allowed to check citizenship status of people detained for questioning.
Olbermann, fool, illegals will obtain Obamacare via this backdoor, as they currently obtain many other benefits. Legislation to close this backdoor was blocked by the Democrats.
No death panels? Certainly not by name, but follow this argument (and compare to HR3200). There will be panels of bureaucrats who
1. define standards of care
2. determine eligibility based on responsiveness
3. are subject to budgetary restrictions
As anyone familiar with government bureaucracy (or any bureaucracy, for that matter), interpretation counts for much, and general, vague and imprecise wording allows wide latitude for interpretation.
Set the standards of care a certain way, then make “responsiveness” a slightly high bar to reach. After all, there is a budget. Regrettably, many will fail. Doubtless, the panelists will feel bad, but it’s not their fault.
As per the Oregon precedent, “Sorry, we can’t afford to provide the prescription”. See, this isn’t a “death panel”. There is a budget, “we’re not made of money”, “we ‘d like to help”, but there are no other options, private payments are no longer legal, etc.
Olbermann seems to be a case study for making journalists, TV show hosts and other talking heads ineligible for any public office.
Arbalest on September 10, 2009 at 11:44 PM
BTW. Obama mentioned an “ultimate goal” in his speech last night, but did not share that with the American people. I think it’d be interesting to know what his “ultimate goal” is.
Is it some kind of master plan only certain people with the right handshake and wink are in on?
James on September 10, 2009 at 11:46 PM
The word in 2000 thru 2004 wasn’t fascist. Nobody associated Bush with fascism. Your team did, however, call him stupid, a drug addict, selected not elected, and said he should be impeached, arrested or even assassinated. This was the entire daily press coverage of the MSM, not one lousy network.
I recall it all fondly and gleefully as I thought the Clinton years were finally over for good.
If you want me to take an hour or so on Lexis to find you some clips and NYT, Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune stories to link for you I will.
But, you’ll be gone by then, tossing turds in the punchbowl on a different thread.
BacaDog on September 10, 2009 at 11:46 PM
MSNBC still broadcating? I bet my local cable access chnnel has more viewers. I just can’t watch Olby. 10 seconds of his whine and I start to twitch.
conservativegrandma on September 10, 2009 at 11:47 PM
Maybe it’s known only to those who use that stupid “O” salute thingy.
ddrintn on September 10, 2009 at 11:47 PM
Why cant conservatives across the country just organize against GE? That would rule!
In The Flesh on September 10, 2009 at 11:50 PM
Not a single example guys? Weak.
crr6 on September 10, 2009 at 11:51 PM
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm
Sorry, Bacadog, but Bush was often called a fascist in his first term. This is from July 2003, Entitled “George Bush and the 14 Points of Fascism”.
google “Bush and fascism” and many, many articles come up…..
Janos Hunyadi on September 10, 2009 at 11:51 PM
Not a mainstream commentator, and it’s far later than when Beck started the fascist meme anyway. Try again.
crr6 on September 10, 2009 at 11:53 PM
saying that conservatives are having a ‘circle jerk’ TWICE in one day is weak, troll. On this thread and
Janos Hunyadi on September 10, 2009 at 11:53 PM
When is Obama going to at least acknowledge our troops fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq?
His Health Care speech could have at least ended with a tribute to the fighting men in Afghanistan and Iraq who have died after 9/11… Instead of the drivel about Ted Kennedy.
Obama has not sent one word of support to our troops in my recent memory. Does he even care about the war… or the troops?
James on September 10, 2009 at 11:54 PM
http://www.bushwatch.com/fascism.htm
Janos Hunyadi on September 10, 2009 at 11:55 PM
http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/george-bush-is-a-fascist-you-wanted-proof-here-it-is/
Janos Hunyadi on September 10, 2009 at 11:57 PM
Thanks, Janos. I was writing that trying to recall the events in the first term era. Memory’s not so sharp as it once was.
I certainly remember the fascist theme, just thought it was later.
Anyway, crr6 is wrong on his point in more ways than one. He’s complaining about FOX and conservatives criticizing his idol when Bush had the entire MSM and the liberal movement tossing grenades at him.
Good catch.
BacaDog on September 10, 2009 at 11:57 PM
Does Obama even know that 9/11 happened? Is he going to be in NYC tomorrow, and not toss a wreath carelessly?
Will he at least fly his Jumbo Jet around Lower Manhattan in a menacing gesture tomorrow, to at least let us know it’s on his mind in some vein…
James on September 10, 2009 at 11:57 PM
Yeah, that was probably the most idiotic thing crr6 has said on this thread. Having to reinvent history is pretty damn desperate. Liberals lecturing people on civility is just galling. It’s just like how they suddenly were against protests and shouting and busing in protester (something they did but the right didn’t) when the tea parties or town halls happened. It just highlights their dishonor and dishonesty.
Ampersand on September 10, 2009 at 11:59 PM
Bill Moron, Politically I’m a reject on CC and ABC….
“good luck”
sven10077 on September 10, 2009 at 11:59 PM
This is from 2008, and once again it’s obviously not a mainstream commentator. You fail again.
I’m not sure where this is from but it’s obviously not a mainstream either. If someone random dude says it on the internet, you think it’s equivalent to a prominent conservative pundit saying it day after day on a major cable news network?
Find something from 2003 or earlier, from a major political commentator or quit wasting my time.
crr6 on September 11, 2009 at 12:00 AM
When Olbermann’s show tanks further, he can leave MSNBC and become the new spokesman for Depends…
djn on September 11, 2009 at 12:04 AM
Wait a second. Beck is “mainstream”? I thought you guys were intent on showing he’s a paranoid lunatic.
Anyway, look through your past issues of The Nation, the New Republic, the NYT, WaPo, remarks of Carville and Begala (especially pre-9/11/01).
You point out “one conservative pundit” and say “well, that isn’t Beck, so it isn’t applicable”. You’ve had the whole friggin’ MSM for decades.
ddrintn on September 11, 2009 at 12:05 AM
What’s so special about 2003? Wait…it’s all about Iraq then, right? That’s when the US became satan in your eyes and the eyes of all you moonbats, isn’t it?
AUINSC on September 11, 2009 at 12:06 AM
Hey Olby,
We already know you don’t like GWB so move on…OK! Furthermore, what does GWB lies have to do with Hussein Lies? That was then and this is now!
Olby, Hussein Lied now accept it and, SHUT THE HELL UP!
BigMike252 on September 11, 2009 at 12:08 AM
Almost forgot: the 4000+ dead soldiers and tens of thousands of wounded/crippled soldiers in Iraq.
Some of them, perhaps the first 100, can be attributed to Bush actually invading Iraq. How many did we lose during the actual invasion?
But the remainder, some 3800+, and virtually all the wounded and crippled, can be blamed on Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, and every other Senator (including Guess Who) and Congressman who obstructed the Iraq effort, dragged their heels, gave the opposition (Al Q in Irag, Mookie and his Madhi Army, etc,) cause to believe that if they attacked us, we’d run away.
It looks like someone is repeating these actions; we now (explicitly post-Bush) have ROEs in Afghanistan that, yesterday, I think, got 4 Marines killed because someone refused to authorize artillery fire.
These deaths were caused by Obama and his minions, no one else.
Olbermann really is an idiot. Even Dylan Avery, college Radio-Television-Film drop-out, isn’t this idiotic.
Arbalest on September 11, 2009 at 12:10 AM
Since when has “Faux News” been a “major cab;e news network”? I thought it was the conservative TV equivalent of Ramparts or Red Mole or something.
ddrintn on September 11, 2009 at 12:11 AM
the fact that you are requiring such specific examples is evidence to how weak your entire point is. The left was hateful from the “selected not elected” days.
Ampersand on September 11, 2009 at 12:12 AM
Yeah, I remember the word was IN NEWS COVERAGE often. No one on the networks had to actually say the word, because they could hide behind their ‘coverage’ of various groups saying it, publishing it, carrying signs with the word, etc
Nice try, douchebag–there are over TEN PAGES of ‘Bush fascist’ stuff on google, and that’s just a start. The media found ways to keep that word in front of the public without actually saying it themselves
What you leave out–because you’re dishonest as well as stupid–is that is that BECK IS ACCURATE.
Obama is a fascist; Bush wasn’t.
Bush was called a fascist even though he wasn’t; Obama is increasingly called a fascist BECAUSE HE IS PROVING THAT HE IS ONE
Janos Hunyadi on September 11, 2009 at 12:13 AM
A friend of mine typed a word search in a bible verse engine. This is what he got back. Fits Obama perfectly.
“abomination”
A malicious man disguises himself with his lips,
but in his heart he harbors deceit.
Though his speech is charming, do not believe him,
for seven abominations fill his heart.
Proverbs 26:24-25
GoodBoy on September 11, 2009 at 12:14 AM
Of course…2003…the year the US stopped being a victim and started fighting back…the year you lefty, traitorous, crapweasels decided to start stabbing your country in the back 24/7…awwwwww…it hurt your feelings that we started fighting back against your precious overlords, eh?
AUINSC on September 11, 2009 at 12:18 AM
Well, crr6′s oh-so-clever “argument” is that if there wasn’t a lefty Gelnn Beck with a huge audience on cable TV back in 2000-2003, then it must mean that the left was oh-so-civil in its attitude toward Bush. The thing that’s ignored is that editorial staffs on loads of major newspapers and in loads of TV newsrooms have been packed with lib Glenn Becks for decades.
ddrintn on September 11, 2009 at 12:21 AM
some could say this is evidence that Bush wasn’t acting like a fascists 2001-2003 and that Obama is acting like one in 2009…
I’m at a loss for what you think it proves…
Ampersand on September 11, 2009 at 12:22 AM
You couldn’t pay me in .223, .308, .44, or .45 ammo to listen to that POS Olberwussy. If you got 45-70 though…
TinMan13 on September 11, 2009 at 12:22 AM
Is he putting on weight? Perhaps he’s drowning his sorrow.
ezye on September 11, 2009 at 12:22 AM
Yeah, the past 24 hours on the ‘news’ had a Bizzaro World quality to it: Democrats are hiking up their skirts and SHOCKED at INCIVILITY. But ever since Borking Robert Bork they’ve been relentless and doing things Chicago Style
Time to fight Fire with Fire……..
Janos Hunyadi on September 11, 2009 at 12:23 AM
To hell with Olbermann. Why should we spend our time talking about this douche on the anniversary of 9/11?
bighead4 on September 11, 2009 at 12:29 AM
WOW! 231 mentions about WMD’s and the dems didn’t call him a liar!
Hum, could that be due to the fact that on Oct. 31 1998 President Clinton signed into law the “Iraq liberation Act” The act was passed by Congress, unanimous in the Senate and 360-38 in the house.
The Act specifically citing Saddam’s WMD’s and his connection to terrorist?
Hint, for Uberidiot that’s about 460 members of congress, the ones that didn’t call Bush a liar when he mentioned WMD’s.
Anyone think the congress didn’t call Bush a liar when made some sort of link tween AQ and Saddam cuz, as reported by The Guardian February 6, 1999
That Saddam was link to Bin Laden based on US attorney general, Janet Reno and Richard Clark (Yes that Richard Clark) Senate testimony that Saddam and Bin Laden
Had linked up!
In Uberidiots world no one EVER heard of AQ, Bin Laden or WMD’s before Bush took office.
DSchoen on September 11, 2009 at 12:31 AM
He lost me at “the real Joe Wilson.”
I wonder how long it takes each night to extract that stick that is up Keith’s ass?
Mallard T. Drake on September 11, 2009 at 12:33 AM
heh. Ask crr6. She / He’d know……
although both Keith and crr6 seem more like gerbil fans
Janos Hunyadi on September 11, 2009 at 12:37 AM
After a few minutes, I stopped listening to what he was saying and by 6 minutes in the droning sound of his voice actually put me to sleep.
willamettevalley on September 11, 2009 at 12:40 AM
The crazed nutroots would say the same thing. “Uhhh well it was ok when we did it because Bush really was a fascist“.You’re no better. If Obama was a fascist he’d come to your mother’s basement and arrest you.
I’m actually being generous. You guys started the fascist crap nearly from Day 1. I’m just asking you to find something from a mainstream commentator in Bush’s first 3 years. You can’t.
crr6 on September 11, 2009 at 12:41 AM
Show some respect for Keith Olbermann. After all, except for Faux News (tee-hee, so clever) he owns his time slot amongst left-handed people with, blond hair and hazel eyes, suffer from mild to moderate astigmatism, own a goldfish named Gill and are allergic to kumquats.
Left Coast Right Mind on September 11, 2009 at 12:42 AM
so? What is your point?
Ampersand on September 11, 2009 at 12:43 AM
President Bush bombed Iraq’s WMD facilities in Operation Desert Fox in 1998.
James on September 11, 2009 at 12:45 AM
Read back. Someone made some sort of comment about the hysteria about Bush being worse than with Obama. I simply said that my side took a few years to kick the “fascist” nonsense into high gear. You guys started nearly from the beginning. Pace yourselves.
Seriously, where do you go from here other than calling for an armed insurrection? You can’t up the lunacy much more.
crr6 on September 11, 2009 at 12:46 AM
….ok. still don’t get you point but I’m sure it all fits together in your head…
Ampersand on September 11, 2009 at 12:50 AM
Do you accept .50 Beowulf?
Chaz706 on September 11, 2009 at 12:52 AM
“Mainstream commentators” frequently “reported” on the “news stories” associating Bush with fascism. They exaggerated and bent over backward to have the President directly associated with fascism on nationwide news network’s Prime Time coverage.
They out-Becked Beck. CNN specialized in doing this.
You have an invalid illogical argument which is essentially a nonsequitur. But, you usually have less than that…….
Janos Hunyadi on September 11, 2009 at 12:53 AM
Your crazies are crazier than the crazies on my side.
crr6 on September 11, 2009 at 12:56 AM
You’re grasping at straws. You tried to find examples, and failed. Another lost argument for you. Don’t worry, this time I won’t make you apologize.
crr6 on September 11, 2009 at 12:57 AM
CCR whats so special about the early years? You hate to admit the fact that the MSM is in the demo/leftist pocket I can’t remember any serious MSM every asking BO any tough questions and he surely was not vetted compared to others on the GOP side. The only ones who get fair treatment is people like McCain who sometimes side with the Demos. The only reason they do this is to cause splits on the GOP side. I can’t remember any major media praising Bush starting from my local paper on up to the NYT. Truely it seems like we are in the last days of freedom of expression for those who disagree with a lefty.
garydt on September 11, 2009 at 12:57 AM
What’s a “mainstream commentator”? A NYT columnist? The Nation? NPR? Mike Malloy? What you’re asking for is a lib equivalent of Beck from 2000-2003. Olbermann wasn’t active as a political commentator during those years.
ddrintn on September 11, 2009 at 12:58 AM
That’s not it. Your side is more saturated with crazies who can’t seem to handle victory or the existence of any opposition whatsoever. It’s all not been as sweet as you dreamed.
ddrintn on September 11, 2009 at 1:01 AM
You don’t have a ‘side’ troll. You’re an odd creepy little troll who comes here to toss out insults to most of the people here and lie repeatedly.
On occasion, you seem strangely interested in childhood sexual behavior and revert to ‘circle jerk’ and other childhood-related sexual references. Why is that imagery in your head so often?
I’m not interesting in debating you; you bring nothing to the table except the insights of an emotionally troubled 10-year-old. You’re about half as smart as you think you are, and keep stumbling over your own juvenile stubborn idiocy.
Get some help: There are lotsa new medications out there…
Janos Hunyadi on September 11, 2009 at 1:02 AM
Olbermann isn’t “the top of the food chain.” He’s the sphincter of the digestive system.
willy v on September 11, 2009 at 1:03 AM
Okay, you asked for this:
You are the one who, on an earlier thread, asked me specific questions about my childhood sexual experiences. This is what pedophiles do; therefore, you are either a pedophile or you decided to adopt the M.O. of one.
No one “forced” me to apologize, or do anything. Your saying so is another lie.
After reading several of your comments since last Summer, I believe that you either ARE or have decided to act like a pedophile for the purpose of attacking me and others. So, for the record:
You, crr6, ARE or show clear signs of being a pedophile.
You, crr6, used this blog to ask me about my childhood sexual experiences, and stated that my political views stemmed from childhood sexual trauma–which clearly interest and apparently arouse you.
You, crr6, have asked similar inappropriate questions of others, which shows a pattern of deviant sexual behavior.
So, make me apologize……..
Janos Hunyadi on September 11, 2009 at 1:05 AM
Your reasoning reminds me of a joke…
Q: How many surrealists does it take to change a light bulb?
A: Fish.
I was going to make a point about “your crazies” actually rioting and causing massive property damage at protests, but I figured the point would be over your head…
Ampersand on September 11, 2009 at 1:07 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiSwqaQ4VbA&feature=related
James on September 11, 2009 at 1:15 AM
I gave you 3 chances, crr6–3 times you tossed out that ‘I made you apologize’ lie, so now you get exposed as what you either are or choose to act like. Get help…….
Janos Hunyadi on September 11, 2009 at 1:20 AM
http://revcom.us/a/017/gay-marriage-veto.htm
Janos Hunyadi on September 11, 2009 at 1:22 AM
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rockwell/red-state-fascism.html
Janos Hunyadi on September 11, 2009 at 1:23 AM
I paused the vid at 00:39
I seriously, seriously will not watch anymore.
Ugly on September 11, 2009 at 1:49 AM
Makes me want to get all mobby.
Ugly on September 11, 2009 at 1:50 AM
Janos Hunyadi on September 11, 2009 at 1:05 AM
Please ban this tool
Ugly on September 11, 2009 at 1:52 AM
Liberals are getting more pathetic day by day.
Dr B on September 11, 2009 at 1:59 AM
I don’t know about that, he’s the left’s version of Michael Savage, and I don’t consider him the leading light of conservatism, whether radio or television.
Anyway, why do you insist on posting this guys over the top propaganda? He’s a caricature, a Bill O’Reilly wannabe, a comic book hero for the urban hip. He has no credibility, no argument, no brains, and yet you continue to post on him as if he has something legitimate to say, or at least comment worthy.
Enough, we know he’s a fool, that’s been proven over and over, no need to constantly remind us! He’s not the problem, Obama and the Democrats are the problem. He’s small potatoes compared to them. Stay focused, Allah, or you’re going to lose a lot of us.
Joe Pyne on September 11, 2009 at 2:02 AM
MSNBC management looks upon this and sees that it is good ?
borntoraisehogs on September 11, 2009 at 2:06 AM
“She/He’d…”
We call crap6 an “it”…
lovingmyUSA on September 11, 2009 at 2:31 AM
Sorry,..No gooberman for me,…. by the look of the picture, let me make this prediction.
Gooberman is sitting on a lollipop,.. any minute he’s gonna tell the rest of us what the flavor is!
Am I close?
christene on September 11, 2009 at 2:42 AM
Which makes crap6 the “end result” of the liberal digestive system.
lovingmyUSA on September 11, 2009 at 2:57 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck3Kh8LcF2k&feature=channel_page
Pretty Good Olby Impressions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lluDooESmlM&feature=video_response
Watch the end of this one Olby gets turned into Chocolate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=warAQ5G5GCg#t=9m30s
rednebulastudios on September 11, 2009 at 3:05 AM
All I heard was Olby whining about Bush. Very original. Oh yeah, using a guys birth name even though he doesn’t go by it. That seems to be a favorite of the deranged Left.
Speedwagon82 on September 11, 2009 at 3:09 AM
If I were at Obama’s Speech I would have LAUGHED OUT LOUD REAL HARD when he said, “That this plan will not add ONE DIME to our DEFICIT!” The Republicans should have fallen on the floor screaming and pointing fingers.
900 BILLION DOLLARS? Well Olbermann would defend that by saying, “Well Mr. Obama TOLD THE TRUTH 900 BILLION IS NOT ONE DIME towards our Deficits it’s 900 BILLION more proof that Republicans are retarded, wrong and I OLBY am always right! Good Night and Good F*&k!”
rednebulastudios on September 11, 2009 at 3:11 AM
Wait one more funny one I found. There should be more OLBY Impersenators out there I mean Colbert has made a fortune ripping off O’Reilly?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5rNwDBQhX8#t=8m24s
rednebulastudios on September 11, 2009 at 3:14 AM
There’s nothing worse than a small thingy ;-)
AsianGirlInTights on September 11, 2009 at 3:27 AM
Sorry, AP…not gonna watch any excerpts from ‘Clowndown.’
It’s too difficult to clean the spittle off the inside of my monitor.
James on September 11, 2009 at 3:44 AM
He may be partisan but at least he tells the truth all the time, unlike the hate network Fox.
Afrolib on September 11, 2009 at 4:02 AM
And we all know a majority of you claiming not to watch the video did watch. Why do cons have to lie to justify that immature partisanship?
Afrolib on September 11, 2009 at 4:03 AM
We do? How? Why do libs have to make things up?
AsianGirlInTights on September 11, 2009 at 4:07 AM
He must have a huge staff of writers or something. That was an 11:00 minute soliloquy–with like 4 words per second.
I don’t get msnbc, but assuming that his program’s an hour long. I wonder if he does that special comment segment every night.
I also wonder if that’s done in one take.
The only reason why I ask is that it seems like a lot of work to only be #5 in the ratings. Seriously, this guy must kick himself when he sees himself losing miserably to the insufferable glenn beck.
EMR on September 11, 2009 at 4:19 AM
Wow, you and crap6, and simplesemen have all done a great job of providing comic relief tonight. Between laughing at your president, the “lap”dog Olbermann, and you all, it’s been a rather enjoyable day/night.
Sorry Charlie, most of us don’t have strong enough stomachs to watch Olberman–a mere glance at his face causes us to shudder.
“immature partisanship”??? You thought that up all by yourself?
lovingmyUSA on September 11, 2009 at 4:30 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »