US drops to #2 on competitiveness

posted at 9:30 am on September 9, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

The effect of the Obama administration’s economic policies have already had an impact on our international standing — and that is bad news.  Financial Times reports that the US has dropped out of its customary position as the most competitive economic environment, allowing Switzerland to capture the top spot.  Why?  Three guesses (via Katie Favazza):

The US government’s sweeping intervention in the private sector has taken its toll on the country’s competitiveness, according to an annual survey by the World Economic Forum.

The country lost its number one spot to Switzerland in the WEF report on global competitiveness, partly because of “particular concerns on the part of the business community about the government’s ability to maintain arm’s-length relationships with the private sector and in the perception that the government spends its resources wastefully”.

Barack Obama, US president, has continued and deepened the government’s involvement in private industry that was started by his predecessor, George W. Bush, as a response to the financial crisis, with bail-outs of the automotive and banking sectors.

The full report has much more detail, but government interventions already committed have dragged our competitiveness down.  That doesn’t include the government takeover of health care and the government takeover of energy production, both under consideration now by Congress.  If the government imposes itself on both industries, it will control more than 30% of the American economy — and the next rating will not be as kind as First Runner-Up.

How did we come to lose our spot?  One reason can be found on page 295 of the report, which ranks nations on the burden of government regulation.  Currently, we rank 53rd on that list, behind such free societies as Morocco, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and China.  The US regulatory scheme is actually 32 nations worse than communist China’s.  (The UK ranks 86th on this list, if that makes us Yanks feel any better.)

Well, at least we’re first in protecting property rights, the very basis of American liberty … or are we?  Nope.  We rank 30th in protecting property rights, two behind the UK.  Maybe we should have skipped the revolution.  France ranks 22nd, and Jordan 24th.    We do somewhat better on protecting intellectual property, but still come in 19th.  In diversion of public funds through corruption, we rank 28th — the wages of pork-barrel politics.  Another outcome of pork: we’re 68th in government waste.

This is an embarrassment to the US.  And yet Congress wants to amplify its pursuit of anti-competitive policies.  Where will we rank when the Democratic leadership finally gets the heave-ho?

Update: HA reader TN pulls some historical data on this that shows we have not always been at #1 — and in fact got as low as #6 three years ago, although we were #1 last year.  Be sure to read it all.  The problem is that we’re moving in the wrong direction to fix the problems that created this drop, as Obama’s domestic agenda seems determined to undermine competitiveness in the long term.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

There are some though that enjoy pulling the pin and throwing the grenade into the mix.

Jeff from WI on September 9, 2009 at 10:11 AM

…says the mortar crew.

MadisonConservative on September 9, 2009 at 10:13 AM

LOLOLOL

Jeff from WI on September 9, 2009 at 10:20 AM

next headline the Dems and Obama will cheer.

“American children hungrier, poorer and increasingly voting Democrat????”

ted c on September 9, 2009 at 10:20 AM

Obama is turing “that shining city on a hill” into “that mediocre country located west of Europe”.

kingsjester on September 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM

1000+

Jeff from WI on September 9, 2009 at 10:20 AM

next headline the Dems and Obama will cheer.

“American children hungrier, poorer and increasingly voting Democrat????”

ted c on September 9, 2009 at 10:20 AM

That’s been their goal for 40+ years

Jeff from WI on September 9, 2009 at 10:21 AM

Something I pray I never hear from my children…

“Look Daddy, the soup line is shorter than the Obamacare line….”

“Daddy, what did you mean when you said, ‘there’s too much month at the end of the opportunity…?’”

ted c on September 9, 2009 at 10:22 AM

I’ve never did he # + deal before. Now if I can only figure out what FIFY means

Jeff from WI on September 9, 2009 at 10:22 AM

“Daddy, tell me what it was like in America when men and women were still free…”

ted c on September 9, 2009 at 10:22 AM

Until 2012, at least, we’ll remain No. 1 in Presidential Bullshit.

TXUS on September 9, 2009 at 10:24 AM

You ain’t seen nothing yet!

jukin on September 9, 2009 at 10:26 AM

Bet we can beat Somalia.

Yes we can!

Loxodonta on September 9, 2009 at 9:38 AM

Yay! I’m so happy!

ladyingray on September 9, 2009 at 10:31 AM

The US regulatory scheme is actually 32 nations worse than communist China’s.

When was the last time you saw melamine in pet food? When was the last time you saw lead-soldered food cans?

Perhaps it’s a good thing that we regulate the quality of the goods we produce, and regulate the truthfulness of advertising.

This study (or at least this part) seems totally bogus to me. It sounds like Somalia ought to come in as number 1, since there appears to be no functioning government there, and people pretty much get to do whatever they want if they have the bullets to back up their decision.

I’m betting that if you adjust the weighting of each category, we come in in front of Switzerland.

I’m sort of shocked at you Ed. I thought you understood lying with statistics…

unclesmrgol on September 9, 2009 at 10:37 AM

The #1 component of Community Organization – Remove all competitive pursuits.
Competition-bad; Weakness-good!

Cybergeezer on September 9, 2009 at 10:38 AM

Jeff from WI on September 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM

my bad…lol

becki51758 on September 9, 2009 at 10:38 AM

I just bought 20 more 1oz Silver American Eagles and a 10 gr gold bar. I may have to raid the ammo suppliers and buy some more metal of the copper coated kind as well.

Economically speaking, this country is going down. You have no idea how much it hurts to even say such things out loud. Denial of reality will do us no good. These numbers (the debt, unfunded liabilities, massive inflation, etc) don’t lie and with this Admin. and Congress we’re only digging the hole deeper. We all need to be prepared. Gold touched just over $1000/oz again yesterday. Get some now before it hits $1500, $2000 or higher. I think Silver is greatly undervalued and is much more affordable than gold for those on a tight budget. Hell, I just wrote off that PS3 I wanted to get since the price dropped and bought the above mentioned metals.

Yakko77 on September 9, 2009 at 10:39 AM

Hey Ochimpy! Go to hell you Marxist sack of crap!

csdeven on September 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM

Predictably, the way Ed phrases his post and present the data, you would think that these horrible rankings are all Obama’s fault.

In fact, all of the horrible rankings in the report that Ed points to were true last year too.

Currently, we rank 53rd on that list, behind such free societies as Morocco, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and China. The US regulatory scheme is actually 32 nations worse than communist China’s….

For reference, last year we were 50th. So we slipped 3 spots in a year half governed by Obama, when we were already so far behind China, and Obama is the only one getting the blame here?

All of the other rankings that Ed mentioned were only slightly higher last year, and the basic conclusions were the same. Here is last year’s report: http://www.weforum.org/documents/gcr0809/index.html.

It is definitely troubling that our rankings are slipping, and it is correct to worry about Congress making things worse, but it is wrong to blame Obama for the basic position we’re currently in.

tneloms on September 9, 2009 at 10:47 AM

Every able-bodied male in Switzerland must own an M16.

Jus sayin.

Akzed on September 9, 2009 at 10:00 AM

excellent point

Jeff from WI on September 9, 2009 at 10:03 AM

It would be other than the fact that it isn’t true.

More like “Just lyin’”.

bileduct on September 9, 2009 at 10:50 AM

Oh, by the way, the most ridiculous part of Ed’s post?

the US has dropped out of its customary position as the most competitive economic environment, allowing Switzerland to capture the top spot.

The US was ranked #6 in 2006!

Oops! It’s amazing how much of an effect Obama was able to have over the US economy all the way back in 2006.

tneloms on September 9, 2009 at 10:50 AM

Under the guise of do gooder Democrats this is what we get when we have the EPA,OSHA,HIGH TAXES and endless litigation. All the time they were just (commies,socialists ,facists)-insert here.
We can come up with a better plan to bring back our manufacturing and production capacities. We can do it at the grassroots level too. The corporations got out of touch just like our representatives. I remember the stories of corporations buying up patent rights of products that would either compete with or make their products obsolete. I mean hey with all this money spent on college grants we should be firing on all cylinders! Don’t forget Ronald Reagan did have a firm belief in the little guy.

sonnyspats1 on September 9, 2009 at 10:52 AM

It is definitely troubling that our rankings are slipping, and it is correct to worry about Congress making things worse, but it is wrong to blame Obama for the basic position we’re currently in.

I think the original post did point out that this slide started w/ Bush’s bailing out of certain companies and that Obama has continued and increased those things that led to the slide, so I think your objections is incorrect.

The spending that happened under Bush was wrong. the bailouts Bush did were wrong. Increasing those things by 10 and socializing parts of the economy will not improve our competitiveness.

Monkeytoe on September 9, 2009 at 10:53 AM

Oh, by the way, the most ridiculous part of Ed’s post?

The US was ranked #6 in 2006!

tneloms on September 9, 2009 at 10:50 AM

I thought the most ridiculous part was where Ed whined about the regulatory system imposing a greater burden on the United States than it does on China, as though that’s a bad thing.

“Relax the regulatory system burden!” cries Ed, “Melamine for everyone!”

bileduct on September 9, 2009 at 10:57 AM

Looks like you missed one of the next ‘ugly’ government controls on the table.

Cap-and-trade is not about energy production, it is about energy use. This will place the government in full control of all businesses.

Look no farther than the city of SF that is now ‘marginally’ taxing businesses for their use of electricity in offices. I say ‘marginally’ because that is the term they are using.

The first part of cap and trade, establishes full government control of all energy use. It simply ‘hands out temporary free passes’ to connected constituants. Once implemented, this will be used to control all business creation from a federal czar of energy use. Probably some well connected individual from Chicago that will be above reproach and not interested in political control in any way at all.

Of course, this will push the US somewhere south of 100 on that list of ‘competitive’ countries.

Freddy on September 9, 2009 at 11:00 AM

Ed Morrissey wants melanine in your food and lead in your kids toys!

bileduct on September 9, 2009 at 11:00 AM

I think the original post did point out that this slide started w/ Bush’s bailing out of certain companies and that Obama has continued and increased those things that led to the slide, so I think your objections is incorrect.

Monkeytoe on September 9, 2009 at 10:53 AM

Actually, it was the Financial Times that noted that. Ed wrote:

The effect of the Obama administration’s economic policies have already had an impact on our international standing

That is true, but not a very good summary of FT’s findings. I would also note that most commenters have targeted only Obama.

But anyway, the more important point is that our ranking was much worse in a year (2006) when Republicans controlled the presidency and the House.

tneloms on September 9, 2009 at 11:10 AM

Ed Morrissey wants melanine in your food and lead in your kids toys!

bileduct on September 9, 2009 at 11:00 AM

That’s Ed, always pushing his “more lead for kids” ideology!

If you want to know why these regulations hurt our economy, check out the CPSIA rules about lead testing for kids’ items. Companies that use metal parts for dirt bikes have to have them lead tested in case a two year old decides to take apart his dirt bike and eat part of it. The market takes care of this stuff all by itself. No company out there wants to see melamine in their food products – mainly because the publicity will hurt their bottom line.

Sheesh – how did we survive these last 200 years without all of these regulations to keep us safe? How did we ever live with electricity without burning our houses down? I mean without the current permit process and inspections and all?

Free Indeed on September 9, 2009 at 11:28 AM

For the life of me, I don’t understand how anyone can look around the world and think that America is the one that needs to change. It’s mind-boggling.

“How happy is the blameless vestal’s lot!
The world forgetting, by the world forgot.
Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind!”

So, what now? Are we going to compete with Britain on who has the biggest mosque?

Michelle Dubois on September 9, 2009 at 11:31 AM

That’s debatable there is datat that still has us as #1 in 2006.

http://www02.imd.ch/documents/wcc/content/pr.pdf
http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/5454.html

xler8bmw on September 9, 2009 at 11:37 AM

The irony is this: America will not be able to afford National Health Care or continue to pay for education until they have a viable energy plan.
By 2019 the US will be importing 75% of it’s oil and that will cost about $2 Trillion per year by then. Priorities….fix the energy problem by starting now or health care & education won’t matter – and no we will not solve Americans energy problem by using solar & wind……

We need Sarah Palin – she would be a real energy Czar.

izoneguy on September 9, 2009 at 11:39 AM

The spending that happened under Bush was wrong. the bailouts Bush did were wrong. Increasing those things by 10 and socializing parts of the economy will not improve our competitiveness.

Monkeytoe on September 9, 2009 at 10:53 AM

Exactly, this is why the democrats and their socialist agenda have to go.
2010 will be the start of that.

China has the Obama administration pegged:

Nobu Su, head of Taiwan’s TMT group, which ships commodities to China, said Beijing is trying to extricate itself from dollar dependency as fast as it can.

 

“China has woken up. The West is a black hole with all this money being printed. The Chinese are buying raw materials because it is a much better way to use their $1.9 trillion of reserves. They get ten times the impact, and can cover their infrastructure for 50 years.”

China is not afraid to call out Obama on his marxist policies just like Russia,and Europe have.

Wednesday, July 01, 2009
China News: Obama’s Economic Reform Is In Conformity With Marxist Doctrine

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/07/china-news-obamas-economic-reform-is-in.html

…The financial reform is very much of the same vein, as the U.S. wants to transform the Federal Reserve into what would be a “super regulator,” comprehensively strengthening regulation towards the financial institutions. It is also planning to establish a new financial consumer safeguard endowed with authority that far supersedes that of the current regulatory system. This way of doing things is in conformity with the Marxist doctrine of the Communist Manifesto in which Marx foretold a capitalist financial crisis. The American Foreign Policy magazine offered a very Marxist “prescription” suggesting that the “whole financial sector be turned into a public utility” — perhaps one could say, “centralization of credit in the hands of the State by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.” (Communist Manifesto)..

The international community is pretty much doing what liberals and their friends in the press are afraid to do and that is tell the truth about Obama’s socialist policies.

“leading America into a black hole” is just about right.

No wonder Obama is loved by Hugo so much,like to peas in a pod.

Hopefully 2010 will do away with the democrats filibuster proof majorities and it’s looking like their hopes of stealing votes with their ACORN friends could be getting exposed right along with their socialist policies:

#
Arrest Warrants Issued
For 11 ACORN Workers
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/09/acorn-turns-florida-workers-voter-fraud-charges/

URGENT: FBI, state law enforcement begin roundup of suspects in Florida voter fraud case

How progressive!!!!!!!!

Baxter Greene on September 9, 2009 at 11:47 AM

Hopefully 2010 will do away with the democrats filibuster proof majorities and it’s looking like their hopes of stealing votes with their ACORN friends could be getting exposed right along with their socialist policies:

#
Arrest Warrants Issued
For 11 ACORN Workers
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/09/acorn-turns-florida-workers-voter-fraud-charges/

Baxter Greene on September 9, 2009 at 11:47 AM

So I noted two things about the article you linked:

1) ACORN reported the criminal activity to the authorities;

2) No votes were recorded against any of the false registrations.

Looks more to me like ACORN got ripped off by lazy workers who were paid to register new voters.

bileduct on September 9, 2009 at 11:56 AM

The problem is that we’re moving in the wrong direction to fix the problems that created this drop, as Obama’s domestic agenda seems determined to undermine competitiveness in the long term.

What happened. Hussein was admired to be his smart guy that obviously did failed in history! His style of economics has already been attempted and failed in the past.

Remember to vote in 2010 and 2012

BigMike252 on September 9, 2009 at 11:56 AM

It really doesn’t matter that GWB was a half assed president and started us down the road on many of these issues. What matters more right now is that we have a president, congress, and senate that don’t give a damn about anything except feeding their coffers to keep themselves in office long term.

That, and the president just doesn’t give a flip about this country. I think it’s pretty clear he hates democracy, capitalism, and freedom in general.

Spiritk9 on September 9, 2009 at 11:57 AM

Arrest Warrants Issued
For 11 ACORN Workers
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/09/acorn-turns-florida-workers-voter-fraud-charges/

Baxter Greene on September 9, 2009 at 11:47 AM

Yeah but Holder won’t prosecute. They got a “good” thing going here.

Christian Conservative on September 9, 2009 at 12:00 PM

xler8bmw on September 9, 2009 at 11:37 AM

The first link you provided is from a ranking that also puts us at #1 in 2009. The second link is simply the Business Competitiveness Index, which was an old component of the ranking noted in this post, but not the index used for the final ranking.

Neither of these links really undercuts my point. Certainly there are many rankings out there that may yield different results, but none of them that I’ve seen (or that has been presented here) shows a precipitous fall for us under policies enacted by Obama or the Democrats.

tneloms on September 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM

Switzerland is number 1? Say, what’s their healthcare system like?

crr6 on September 9, 2009 at 12:05 PM

WE’RE NUMBER TWO! WE’RE NUMBER TWO!

Christien on September 9, 2009 at 12:06 PM

Switzerland is number 1? Say, what’s their healthcare system like?

crr6 on September 9, 2009 at 12:05 PM

Socialized.

bileduct on September 9, 2009 at 12:08 PM

Abolish Switzerland!

Christien on September 9, 2009 at 12:09 PM

Socialized.

bileduct on September 9, 2009 at 12:08 PM

Interesting. In fact, I hear it’s very similar to Obamacare.

crr6 on September 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM

Switzerland is number 1? Say, what’s their healthcare system like?

crr6 on September 9, 2009 at 12:05 PM

Say, when the US was number 1, why was it ahead of all those other nations… most or all of whom have socialized medicine?

I note France and England aren’t in the top 10… what happened to them? Too much free market capitalism?

mankai on September 9, 2009 at 12:12 PM

There isn’t much poverty among the Swiss… then again there isn’t much poverty among Swiss-Americans either.

mankai on September 9, 2009 at 12:13 PM

BTW, off topic a bit….anybody remember how we were told the “HOUSING CRISIS IS OVER!” back in June? Well, not so much:

http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSTRE5883S620090909?feedType=RSS&feedName=businessNews&rpc=23&sp=true

AUINSC on September 9, 2009 at 12:16 PM

Noted: The Swiss do not make their welfare state recipients comfortable, and welfare services are only available to legal citizens.

daesleeper on September 9, 2009 at 12:16 PM

Say, when the US was number 1, why was it ahead of all those other nations… most or all of whom have socialized medicine?

We were #6 just three years ago. Facts really aren’t your friend today. Or any day for that matter.

crr6 on September 9, 2009 at 12:20 PM

Building the socialist, second class nation they all dream about……

Thank you for electing these idiots into office.

Hening on September 9, 2009 at 12:26 PM

The goals of the Swiss reforms sound familiar to Massachusetts: Cover everyone, make insurance more affordable for low and moderate income people, and control health care costs. The individual mandate was combined with insurance market reforms that require Swiss insurers to offer a standardized, comprehensive benefit package defined by the federal government. Individuals can choose from products that have different deductibles (ranging from $240 to $2,050), and they have the right to change health insurers every year. Federal subsidies are available to low and moderate income people to make coverage more affordable.

Eleven years later, Switzerland has achieved its goal of universal coverage: Everyone has access to the same comprehensive health insurance coverage, at the same premiums, and to the same quality of medical care.

In the March [2007] vote on the initiative [single-payer], voters in only two Swiss states out of 26 approved the single payer initiative. Even states with the highest premiums, like Geneva, defeated it. Polls show that voters were concerned about what the measure would mean for their individual health insurance premiums, and they were not persuaded that a single payer system would be more effective at controlling rising costs. So, even if there was strong opposition to the individual mandate 11 years ago, today few Swiss want to be relieved of this obligation.

- Béatrice Schaad Noble is a Swiss journalist who this month got her master’s in public health at the Harvard School of Public Health

mankai on September 9, 2009 at 12:28 PM

Switzerland, which has mandatory health insurance, rejected a proposal to adopt a Single Payer system on March 11, 2007. 71% of voters opposed it. Switzerland currently has 87 different private health plans.

mankai on September 9, 2009 at 12:34 PM

How did we come to lose our spot? One reason can be found on page 295 of the report, which ranks nations on the burden of government regulation. Currently, we rank 53rd on that list, behind such free societies as Morocco, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and China. The US regulatory scheme is actually 32 nations worse than communist China’s. (The UK ranks 86th on this list, if that makes us Yanks feel any better.)

Oh god! How could we be so overregulated? I certainly know that China’s lack of regulation couldn’t have lead to lead paint in children’s toys : http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/10/business/worldbusiness/10iht-lead.5.7455679.html. We should be more like them.

weilbourbaki on September 9, 2009 at 12:34 PM

mankai on September 9, 2009 at 12:34 PM

Yeah, I never said they have a single payer. I said…

In fact, I hear it’s very similar to Obamacare.

crr6 on September 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM

crr6 on September 9, 2009 at 12:37 PM

“Daddy, tell me what it was like in America when men and women were still free…”

ted c on September 9, 2009 at 10:22 AM

Shhhh…quiet dear. Big Brother is listening

Bevan on September 9, 2009 at 12:40 PM

unclesmrgol on September 9, 2009 at 10:37 AM

Good regulations do not present a real barrier to economic activity. The effect they do have is allows the government to stomp executives that violate the trust that you don not put poison in dog food and toothpaste.

Slowburn on September 9, 2009 at 12:45 PM

1) ACORN reported the criminal activity to the authorities;

2) No votes were recorded against any of the false registrations.

Looks more to me like ACORN got ripped off by lazy workers who were paid to register new voters.

bileduct on September 9, 2009 at 11:56 AM

Well with this logic,Bush and the Army are not to blame for Abu Ghraib since the Army first found out about the crimes and were doing their own investigation before it was leaked to the press.
Thanks for clearing that up.

ACORN has an extensive history of voter fraud all across the nation for years:


POLITICS: Obama and the Integrity Gap: ACORN

Chapter four of seven.
C. ACORN
http://baseballcrank.com/archives2/2008/10/war_the_grievin.php

ACORN’s rap sheet for voter fraud alone is extensive. This is “an organization that has a “decade long history of voter fraud, embezzlement and misuses of taxpayer funds” that Consumer Rights League Chief Public Advocate, James Terry testified about last month to the House Judiciary.”

The Complete Guide to ACORN Voter Fraud
October 14, 2008 – by Jim Hoft
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-complete-guide-to-acorn-voter-fraud/

Further igniting the voter fraud/voter registration debate was the news that a national community organizing group is being investigated in at least 14 states and several swing states for massive irregularities. This news would make headlines anyway, but what made it worse was that Barack Obama was a key player in this organization, the [3] Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, in the past. Obama [4] trained its local leaders, [5] represented the organization in court, and worked to [6] funnel funds to the organization. The Obama campaign also [7] donated $800,000 this year to an ACORN affiliate.

ACORN’s corrupt practices span more than a decade and or so important to the democratic party that the NY Times covers for them and Obama:


New York Times Finally Admits It Spiked Obama/ACORN Corruption Story

By Matthew Vadum on 5.18.09 @ 1:50AM
http://spectator.org/blog/2009/05/18/new-york-times-finally-admits

Acknowledging what the blogosphere has known for weeks, the New York Times finally went on record to admit that just before last Election Day it killed a politically sensitive news story involving corruption allegations that might have made the Obama campaign look bad.

These are the same people still whining about Bush stealing the 2000 election(and 2004) even though 5 Major newspapers investigations showed otherwise and not one singe charge has been put forth.

Remember what Gore said when a total state recount was offered to him……”NO”.

But somehow democrats don’t see any problem with the massive evidence of voter fraud of ACORN and black panthers welding clubs and hurling racial slurs in front of a voting center.

According to bileduct, this is just ”
Looks more to me like ACORN got ripped off by lazy workers who were paid to register new voters.

Reality is not a strong suit for the democrats and their supporters.

Baxter Greene on September 9, 2009 at 12:48 PM

This is on the Ninth level of dishonest.

Here’s the deal:

1). Whe people mention that we are 37th on the tier on healthcare by the World Health Organization, you throw that study out, saying that the study is dishonest, flawed etc.

2). You now put up this report to tell us how Obama essentially sucks. Yet, who is ahead of us here? Switzerland!

Guess what folks. They have a national (universal) healthcare system.

But go ahead and pretend we just need malpratice reform and deregulation.

ckoeber on September 9, 2009 at 12:51 PM

Not that I’ll be watching the Liar-in-Chief tonight, but I wonder which MSM reporter will bring up this subject tonight during Q&A session and ask how Teddyscare will impact our international competitiveness.

Would also want China’s take on Ogabe’s healthcare rathole.

crickets chirping……

Thought so!

Sweet_Thang on September 9, 2009 at 1:01 PM

Sure, under full Republican control we got down to 6th place, but nevermind that. Obama is going to send us down the toilet! Fear! Anxiety! Worry! Oh, the humanity! We’re in 2nd place!!!

It’s shocking how little faith you guys have in America.

orange on September 9, 2009 at 1:14 PM

I thought we were talking about ‘competitiveness’, as in the ability to compete in a market place.

How did it get sidetrack to the world’s # ranking on healthcare? Whose ranking anyway, WHO?

Sir Napsalot on September 9, 2009 at 1:19 PM

I thought we were talking about ‘competitiveness’, as in the ability to compete in a market place.

How did it get sidetrack to the world’s # ranking on healthcare? Whose ranking anyway, WHO?

Sir Napsalot on September 9, 2009 at 1:19 PM

Competitiveness looks at all aspects of the economy, not just at the countries that have the coolest products and services.

And guess what? Not having to worry about healthcare makes it easier to focus on your job. Which makes you more competitive than the country that does have to worry.

Not that hard.

ckoeber on September 9, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Good regulations do not present a real barrier to economic activity. The effect they do have is allows the government to stomp executives that violate the trust that you don not put poison in dog food and toothpaste.

Slowburn on September 9, 2009 at 12:45 PM

I doubt this report makes a distinction between “good” and “bad” regulations, as those are in the eye of the beholder.

I have some libertarian friends who think that FDA intrusion into the marketplace is unConstitutional, and that the marketplace will sort out the unhealthy products.

unclesmrgol on September 9, 2009 at 1:57 PM

These communist takeover bills are all about taxing the American people. The health care bill turns lots of enforcement over to the IRS. Tax liens take precedence over all other obligations and cannot even be dismissed by bankruptcy. This is the path toward total takeover of liberty! The ability to tax and take by force will lead to slavery and tyranny the likes of which we can’t imagine in this great nation. Government must be reigned in at all levels: state, local, and federal! Liberty is riding on it!

Marco on September 9, 2009 at 2:13 PM

Socialized.

bileduct on September 9, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Interesting. In fact, I hear it’s very similar to Obamacare.

crr6 on September 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM

The Swiss are also one of the most literate societies in the world, and they have strict immigration controls; while we may view their society as “liberal” as opposed to conservative, most American conservatives would lovingly embrace American liberals who were as fiscally conservative as the Swiss.

BTW, I hope you don’t believe that the U.S. is so bereft of values that we should start entertaining notions of imitating the Swiss. Their societal model is as simple as that of a lab rat in comparison to the U.S. being more the complexity of a human. Medical researchers say that about 92% of compounds that show great effectiveness in lab rats are totally ineffective when used on the complex set of hormones and chemical balances known as humans. For the human, or even the monkey, to look to the lab rat to show us how to develop our values for the new millennia is democracy run amok. Equal voice=equal truth? Not on your life. Libs can look for values like some shaman in fecal matter, stars or small societal models if they want, but the only reason their reverse progressiveness even gets a hearing is due to the complex nature of our society that guarantees first amendment rights and the value we place on listening to losers so we don’t forget how wretched we would all be if we followed them.

rwenger43 on September 9, 2009 at 2:44 PM

crr6 on September 9, 2009 at 12:37 PM

How is it like Obamacare (who has a stated goal of single-payer)?

Do you have access to 87 different private insurance options?

mankai on September 9, 2009 at 2:55 PM

Guess what folks. They have a national (universal) healthcare system.

But go ahead and pretend we just need malpratice reform and deregulation.

ckoeber on September 9, 2009 at 12:51 PM

Guess what? They don’t have single-payer and they have 87 different private insurance options.

Sound anything like Obamacare?

They rejected single-payer in 2007 with 71% voting against.

mankai on September 9, 2009 at 3:02 PM

Sure, under full Republican control we got down to 6th place, but nevermind that. Obama is going to send us down the toilet! Fear! Anxiety! Worry! Oh, the humanity! We’re in 2nd place!!!

It’s shocking how little faith you guys have in America.

orange on September 9, 2009 at 1:14 PM

Our lack of faith is absolutely not with America per se, but with the bozos in charge who have done a masterful job of sending it “down the toilet” in a matter of mere months.

Sweet_Thang on September 9, 2009 at 3:18 PM

Number 2? well, that’s crap.

TheSitRep on September 9, 2009 at 3:26 PM

Sure, under full Republican control we got down to 6th place

It depends on the reasoning. The drop in 2009 is SPECIFICALLY linked to current government policy.

“particular concerns on the part of the business community about the government’s ability to maintain arm’s-length relationships with the private sector and in the perception that the government spends its resources wastefully”.

mankai on September 9, 2009 at 3:34 PM

Truth is, we already fully cover the elderly and the poor (and many middle class children) through Medicare and Medicaid. But just as Clinton and the GOP “reformed” welfare, we must reform Mcare and Mcaid.

I wish I had 87 different options from which to choose (as the Swiss do).

The problem is not “universal coverage” the problem is how you get there… and the Swiss, by nearly a 3-1 margin, rejected the single-payer, government-run option. I’m curious if the Swiss have tort limits as well.

mankai on September 9, 2009 at 3:59 PM

New Zealand and Switzerland have abolished their tort law system and have adopted comprehensive “accident” programs to compensate all injured persons.

Not sure of all the implications, but it sounds interesting.

mankai on September 9, 2009 at 4:02 PM

In fact, I hear it’s very similar to Obamacare.

crr6 on September 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM

Can you please send me a link to Obama’s proposal? There are a few house and senate bills that have circulated around the web.

Where is the text of Obama’s ‘health care reform?’

daesleeper on September 9, 2009 at 4:39 PM

Do I have to say it again?

TOTAL FAILURE!

Obama wants an economic crisis of biblical proportions so he can take over everything for the sake of the crisis.

Get ready for gas lines, food lines, Obama on every channel 24 hours a day. Any complaining or dissent will be dealt with severely, as you will be sent to a work camp in Alaska or Death Valley.

I’m just a racist, right wing terrorist who used to work for CNN…

Atlanta Media Guy on September 9, 2009 at 4:44 PM

A foreign government could scarcely do the economic damage to this country that our own politicians have. The Republicans I suspect got the ball rolling through RINOism and the current administration/Dem Congress through Socialism.

I still have yet to think of anything this current government has done that would forestall the economic decline much less to reverse it. That’s the problem. Government can only cause decline in commerce…they can do little to make it any better.

But I also think they have no intention of allowing the economy to improve as it is to their advantage to have us be in permanent ‘crisis mode’.

Dr. ZhivBlago on September 9, 2009 at 5:07 PM

Don’t worry be happy. Hussein is aiming for dead last…

Friendly21 on September 9, 2009 at 6:13 PM

Republicans unhinged!

bileduct on September 10, 2009 at 12:09 AM

Comment pages: 1 2