NYT highlights funemployment in Democratic recession
posted at 10:55 am on September 8, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
How can you tell that we’ve gone from a Republican to Democratic administration? Reading the New York Times provides readers an instructive guide for unemployment coverage. Gone are the snarky references to “McJobs” in a Republican recovery, when unemployment was at 5.4%, or political criticism disguised as pseudointellectual etymology when it was at 5.8%. Now, the NYT highlights the blessings of unemployment when it reaches 9.7%, especially to community organizers-cum-politicians (h/t Geoff A)
The work is often mundane: Investment research analysts are now making cold calls to voters, and headhunters are handing out leaflets at subway stations and supermarkets.
But the experience, coming at a time of crisis in their lives, has been surprisingly powerful for many of them. Volunteering, they say, restores some of what they lost along with their jobs: a place to go every day, a reason to put on a clean suit, people to work beside, a sense of purpose.
And for some of the jobless, the experience has triggered a profound reassessment.
Yukyong Choi, 36, a former litigator who has not worked in a year, is now an unpaid volunteer for P.J. Kim, a City Council candidate in Lower Manhattan.
“One thing that I’ve discovered through this process is I don’t really want to go back to that life,” Mr. Choi said. “That was a life filled with 18-hour days, and having to work with people you may not enjoy. It’s not the money anymore; I want to do things that will have a real effect on people’s lives, as opposed to just trying to get a company out of a situation.”
During the Bush administration, the Times and other media outlets routinely disparaged job creation as somehow beneath the dignity of the workers, even as wages rose and unemployment fell. The work was demeaning and mundane, and the pay inadequate. Every chance they had to use anecdotal complaints about supposed burger-flipping or paper-shifting wound up in front-page stories about how deceptive the Bush recovery was.
Now that the Obama administration has utterly failed to control job losses through its stimulus package, the Times shifts gears. Now work itself was demeaning, and unemployment is liberating. People can volunteer for political campaigns and come home tapping their toes and singing a song! The jobless can now have “profound reassessments”!
Did the New York Times acknowledge in 2003 and 2005 that so-called “McJobs” also gave people a “place to go every day, a reason to put on a clean suit, people to work beside, a sense of purpose”? What’s more, those jobs paid people to do all of that. Private enterprise didn’t just restore a sense of purpose, they gave people a way to pay their bills and contribute to the economy. Somehow, though, that’s more demeaning than doing all of these menial tasks for no pay whatsoever.
What’s next? A series on the joys and liberation of homelessness?









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Does anyone even read the New York Times anymore?
diditagain on September 8, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Homelessness unshackles us from the capitalist anchor of “Place” and “Property”.
Lehosh on September 8, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Glad to see that the MSM is celebrating peoples’ misfortunes.
UltimateBob on September 8, 2009 at 11:00 AM
I hear it’s the number 1 newspaper to use on the floor until the puppy is “house broken”. Very absorbent main section and classifieds.
Jeff from WI on September 8, 2009 at 11:00 AM
me thinks the new york times needs some end of life counseling.
SHARPTOOTH on September 8, 2009 at 11:01 AM
I have found that life is more rewarding if I can volunteer my time to a politician that will take income and wealth from productive members of society, extend my unemployment benefits, provide free to me health care, food stamps, and subsidized rent. I have plenty of time to care about me and my many wants. /s
WashJeff on September 8, 2009 at 11:02 AM
Slavery = Freedom
darclon on September 8, 2009 at 11:03 AM
The homeless disappeared on 1/20/93… reappeared 1/20/01… and have since disappeared sometime around 1/20/09.
They’re a wacky bunch!
mankai on September 8, 2009 at 11:03 AM
In other news, the NYTimes reports that War is Peace.
rbj on September 8, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Advice to all soon to be unemployed New York Slimes workers.
Good luck paying the mortgage, electric bill and feeding yourself you liberated fools.
Knucklehead on September 8, 2009 at 11:03 AM
But you have money coming from somewhere.
LibTired on September 8, 2009 at 11:07 AM
Volunteering does not put a roof over your head nor food on your table. idiots!
becki51758 on September 8, 2009 at 11:08 AM
ignorance is strength
JustTruth101 on September 8, 2009 at 11:08 AM
Whats next? The joy of having the government confiscate 90+% of your assets.
tyrfing on September 8, 2009 at 11:08 AM
What the hell happened to volunteering at a nursing home, soup kitchens, etc….anything but volunteering for a political candidate. That is far from being noble..
becki51758 on September 8, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Shorter NYT:
No dirty capitalist job = liberation
Marxism is awesome! WWWWHHHHEEEEEeeee!
Good Lt on September 8, 2009 at 11:11 AM
Yes, but, the stock market is up, oil is up, gold is up, the economy is looking up. Everything is looking up.
Hope, happiness, joy.
Skandia Recluse on September 8, 2009 at 11:11 AM
The New York Times is a communistic piece of trash and is hopelessly shilling for its godless messiah, Obama.
rplat on September 8, 2009 at 11:11 AM
Now that is true freedom….
ladyingray on September 8, 2009 at 11:11 AM
yukyong choi is using his wealth obtained from his “previous career” (legal work) to fund his volunteerism.
Kudos to him for making lemonade out of lemons; I do have lots of problems with people who would take my money without my permission to fund similar volunteers.
Choi has made a lifestyle choice, and it will work until his money runs out — if it ever does.
unclesmrgol on September 8, 2009 at 11:11 AM
NYT:
We’ve always been at war with Eastasia!
VelvetElvis on September 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM
But they have Obama! Checks on the way.
/s
HoustonRight on September 8, 2009 at 11:14 AM
Looking past the obvious hypocrisy of the NYT, their editorializing betrays a very alarming consistency. Namely, working for private wages is bad, while working to help people lobby for more government power is good. I wish their writers would put it this bluntly, because then at last all the masks would be swept aside and everyone would see easily what they are all about.
jwolf on September 8, 2009 at 11:14 AM
We have a lady friend, 30 something, all was fine until the club spot by her apartment went belly up. And there are no other clubs within walking distance.
Fun-time over.
tarpon on September 8, 2009 at 11:14 AM
Some of us work AND volunteer and it doesn’t take a dipsh!t president wrecking the economy to motivate us to volunteer.
Monica on September 8, 2009 at 11:15 AM
I mean, isn’t EVERYONE in America an actor or trust fund baby or lawyer or Democrat politician? Like, DUH!
Everyone just needs to shut up and worship Obama. That will cure what ails them. With Obama, all things are possible.
Good Lt on September 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Oh yes, there is nothing like the thrill of not knowing where your next meal is coming from. {rolls eyes}
Dark Star on September 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Haven’t they gone bankrupt yet?
MarkTheGreat on September 8, 2009 at 11:17 AM
You’re quickly becoming one of my favorites around here.
LibTired on September 8, 2009 at 11:18 AM
Hell, I take a “demeaning, mundane” job. Thanks to Obambi and crew, I have been “liberated” for several months and I am really pissed about that
ZeeMI on September 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM
Only when it’s linked at HA, and then only sporadically.
thomasaur on September 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM
Surely he represents the common man, who can trade his job for a role as an unpaid volunteer.
Daggett on September 8, 2009 at 11:20 AM
How weak does one have to be to WANT to be a tool.
bbz123 on September 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM
It’s the Summer of George!
tarheelcon on September 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM
This may be a radical thought but don’t the unemployed need to be putting on a clean suit and going out and finding employment?
I’m not totally unsympathetic to people who are so wrapped up in what they do that losing a job means losing one’s identity but that doesn’t give them an out. It just means they were working for the wrong reason to begin with.
highhopes on September 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM
Yeah, who needs money? I mean it’s not like the average American has to pay for food, shelter, clothing, transportation, and electricity.
Doughboy on September 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM
instead of Funemployment the new meme is VOLunemployment.
weewilly on September 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM
With Obama, all things are possible.
Good Lt on September 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Like multipling the loafers!
fourdeucer on September 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM
We should be gravely concerned. From Drudge: AMERICA ‘FACES ARGENTINA-STYLE FALL’…
Alden Pyle on September 8, 2009 at 11:25 AM
You clearly are wise and discerning. :)
Monica on September 8, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Maybe the NYT reporter is preparing for eventual unemployment and getting their mind wrapped around how it should feel. Always with the feelings, and never with being prepared to take care of themselves in the future.
Kissmygrits on September 8, 2009 at 11:27 AM
NYT–great for wrapping fish or lining bird cages.
tomswid on September 8, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Is this NYT story the first volley into mainstreaming a national service movement. Could it be that as unemployment increases that there will be promises made by this administration that brings the masses under their servitude? I’m getting that sinking feeling again.
HoustonRight on September 8, 2009 at 11:28 AM
Anybody who, at this point, still gets their ‘news’ from the NYT belongs to a self-selected group of ignoramuses. Most Americans don’t buy ‘funemployment’ as a concept…they want jobs. They NYT can spin this anyway they like…if the only people who vote for Obama in 2012 are the tiny, ever dwindling group of NYT readers, he’s doomed. The vast majority of Americans will vote the marxist idiot out of office. I can’t wait until the NYT goes broke.
AUINSC on September 8, 2009 at 11:28 AM
Why don’t they just change their name to Pravda? They couldn’t be any more obvious.
aikidoka on September 8, 2009 at 11:33 AM
Nice.
The multiplying of the loafers and fizzles. It will be in the Obama Bible one day, taught as a great parable.
Good Lt on September 8, 2009 at 11:33 AM
After the NYT did not cover the Van Jones controversy it lost what little credibility it had. They are irrelevant.
d1carter on September 8, 2009 at 11:34 AM
You mock, but my hometown newspaper did that very thing last month. They did a profile of a neo-hippie twenty-something who lives under a bridge with his dog and his archery equipment. He found it very liberating not to pay bills and to borrow the bathing facilities of his friend’s parents. The newspaper presented his lifestyle as a reasonable choice. That may be the case up until mid-October, when it will become a cold reality.
mchristian on September 8, 2009 at 11:35 AM
The Wall Street Journal beat them to it….
ujorge on September 8, 2009 at 11:35 AM
Wow! I’m now seriously considering quitting my job. The last year has been so stressful and agrivating that I wonder if I should continue to work so hard. Thanks NYT now I can see how great it is to be among the ranks of the funemployeed. What an idiot I was, now I’ve seen the light.
Tommy_G on September 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM
Our betters tell us
That unemployment is good.
Soon they see close up!
Haiku Guy on September 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM
I can just see it now, Robert Gibbs reporting that 6.9M Americans were so inspired by the filthy liar’s “call to reassess and serve” that they have left the ranks of the employed and are now doing volunteer work.
highhopes on September 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM
What credibility and relevance did it until that time?
mchristian on September 8, 2009 at 11:38 AM
Can’t wait for the articles about the sweet release of death that Obama’s Fun Panels will bring to so many.
LibTired on September 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM
I’m volunteering to help get Harry Red ousted.
VegasRick on September 8, 2009 at 11:41 AM
A good sobering piece on the same topic was in the Wall St Journal a month or so back.
A former financial type who used to lunch at a high-power steak-house is now a waiter at the same steak-house. He said he had to do it to support his family. It wasn’t sugar-coated and it was clear that while some of it could be called a “learning experience” for him, the personal “growth and introspection” was not worth the turmoil to his life and family.
NYTimes and Boston Globe have run several of these fluff pieces on people who find being unemployed to be liberating.
If a Republican was in the White House, the same stories would highlight the pain and suffering of the children.
sultanp on September 8, 2009 at 11:41 AM
Hmmm, my cat seems focused on it when she gets it wee-weed up….
karl9000 on September 8, 2009 at 11:43 AM
What’s Obama going to say when unemployment “officially” breaks the 10% barrier… It is probably WAY over that now…
Khun Joe on September 8, 2009 at 11:43 AM
Does anyone even read the New York Times anymore?
Hmmm, my cat seems focused on it when she gets it wee-weed up….
karl9000 on September 8, 2009 at 11:43 AM
The only time I ever see the NYT is on Red Eye…
Khun Joe on September 8, 2009 at 11:44 AM
Is there a way to get in touch with Mr. Choi? I have a few questions like: Where does Mr. Choi live? How does Mr. Choi pay for where he lives? Does Mr. Choi have to pay to eat? Does Mr. Choi even eat?
moonsbreath on September 8, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Does this mean that Van Jones qualify’s to become the new Volunteering Czar?
Rovin on September 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Cruel and unusual punishment for fish and birds. I’m reporting you to Peta and the Fish and Wildlife Dept.
TXUS on September 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM
What is Van “Ain’t be got no job” Jones take on this funemployment stuff?
ted c on September 8, 2009 at 11:55 AM
There is a job opening for career counseling for Van Jones. Looks like he could use a career coach.
seven on September 8, 2009 at 11:56 AM
The problem I have with this story is that it appears that the man is trying to live the same lifestyle he had as a financial type but on a whole lot less income. I would hope the lesson for him would be to live within one’s means and to save for unexpected occurances.
The Washington Post routinely has stories of people who lost their jobs and what they are doing to get by. All of it usually starts with them attempting to live the same lifestyle they’ve always lived even though they can’t afford that lifestyle.
highhopes on September 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Afrolib got a promotion to the McFlurry machine.
Chuck Schick on September 8, 2009 at 11:58 AM
Volunteering for a political campaign is a career move you idiots! The government is only one hiring these days.
PackerBronco on September 8, 2009 at 12:00 PM
The intellectual value of the NYT can be measured by it’s stock price on the NYSE.
GarandFan on September 8, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Yep, almost all the so-called job growth to offset the 9.7% unemployed is in public sector jobs, many of them temporary. It’s a dirty little fact that the filthy liar’s cheerleaders refuse to mention.
highhopes on September 8, 2009 at 12:05 PM
When the Times runs 8 pages long and costs $15/issue, they’ll still be printing socialist pap. There’ll still be plenty of stupid liberals in New York who will pay it.
Socratease on September 8, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Why don’t they just change their name to Pravda? They couldn’t be any more obvious.
aikidoka on September 8, 2009 at 11:33 AM
I wish people would stop picking on Pravda! In case you’ve missed it, Pravda has been dead on the money regarding who and what Obama is…
http://newsfromrussia.com/world/americas/08-01-2009/106908-obama-0
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/24-12-2008/106866-Obama_Hope_World-0
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/106778-0/
Certainly Pravda has provided more vetting of Obama than any of it’s American counterparts. Who’d-ah-Thunk-it but, if Obama manages to “bring fundamental change” to America, we may be only country on earth actually practicing communism.
Unbeleivable!
Archimedes on September 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM
That lucky Van Jones! Now that those mean conservatives have used Van’s own words to force him to resign his job, Van Jones gets to share the joys of funemployment as well.
There’s Van out volunteering with the kulaks in the hood, cleaning up the toxic sludge dumped by ‘whitey’. And Van imploring his comrades to protest our brutal police and to riot in the streets. And then for fun, smashing the Bourgeois capitalist system as a voluntary tribute to Dear Leader.
Good times…
Ogabe on September 8, 2009 at 12:12 PM
Translation: Si Se Puede!
“we could save all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling, if everybody was just inflating their tires and getting regular tune-ups,”
Mr_Magoo on September 8, 2009 at 12:21 PM
Considering the number of people willing to plop down $5 for a cup of crappy “designer” coffee, the NYT will indeed always have a built in audience. Particularly life-long New York residents who think the earth ends just west of Manhattan.
highhopes on September 8, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Market is up 38 points and the AP runs this ridiculous headline:
Stocks rise as takeover news boosts traders’ mood
Stocks rise as investors look to takeover discussions as promising sign for economic recovery
Mr_Magoo on September 8, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Translation into Obamaspeak: Hey kids, let’s create a government run program that creates mandatory tune-ups and tire inflation at government subsidized facilities.
highhopes on September 8, 2009 at 12:26 PM
I just read a similar article in the local Lawrence, KS (uber-liberal college town) paper while I was out there visiting this past weekend. Essentially titled, “Funemployment”, it covered three individuals who were currently unemployed. Two were college-aged “men” who were doing nothing about being unemployed other than watching movies and honing their MarioCart skills while collecting unemployment. One stated how great it was to no longer have to deal with people at his fast-food job, and now he could sleep late and almost make the same amount of money. Only the woman interviewed was doing something productive with her time, but that amounted to remodeling he own home. Never did the article touch upon job searching or personal responsibility. Unemployment in Kansas is just about to run out, so I know two sets of parents that better be re-feathering the nest for those two well-raised sons.
ej_pez on September 8, 2009 at 12:27 PM
I’ve worn everything short of a tuxedo and applied at enough stores to cover most of the alphabet.
For the idiot die-hard capitalists and the obtuse: There. Are. No. Jobs. Left.
Dark-Star on September 8, 2009 at 12:27 PM
I don’t read the Times, the Post, or L.A. Times (and I live in L.A.)I don’t watch ABC CBS NBC CNN or MSNBC…
I watch Fox and I read online blogs such as Hot Air, Drudge, Conservatives4Palin, Free Republic, Naked Emperor, Townhall, Newsbusters, Ace, Never HuffPo Daily Kos Politico…
I figured this out a while back…the MSM and the Democrats are one and the same.
CCRWM on September 8, 2009 at 12:28 PM
We were always taught, in the retail environment, that if robbed to comply with the robber but not to “suggestive sell.” Oh, what am I talking about! NYT doesn’t read conservative blogs!
ExpressoBold on September 8, 2009 at 12:30 PM
That’s interesting. I’m working. I know a lot of other people working.
Since you hate capitalists, where do you think new jobs will come from? The gov’t? How will the gov’t pay workers? Where will the gov’t get money?
Monkeytoe on September 8, 2009 at 12:36 PM
Nonsense. I had to leave Michigan to find employment but there are jobs out there. I did what I had to do to work. Could it possibly be you or your approach that is the problem? Could it be that you are unrealistic in what you want to be doing, where you want to be working or some other factor? If, for example, you are looking for a job in auto manufacturing in Detroit these days then there are no jobs but that isn’t a realistic job search. Bottom line: Maybe it is you.
highhopes on September 8, 2009 at 12:44 PM
Hooray for you. I’m guessing you’re not one of the younger generation who’s been desperately trying for any sort of employment?
Control+F
“I hate capitalists”
“! Phrase not found”
So much for that nonsense. My wrath is directed at the blockheads who continually insist that us unemployed young whippersnappers are just being too picky. As for the latter part – who indeed? Who the hell has the funds to start hiring new workers, and how will you make a profit anymore?
Same way the gov’t paid workers and got money during WW2 when we were building an army that kicked @$$ on multiple continents simultaneously, I suppose.
Dark-Star on September 8, 2009 at 12:46 PM
..affirm on that. I use the front page for that purpose — especially when the Chief Pantload’s picture is there on the top of the fold. Also, I do NOT buy it. I wait until it’s discarded at a local diner.
VoyskaPVO on September 8, 2009 at 12:48 PM
That’s assuming they don’t make the cut on the professional Mario Cart circuit. :-0
Job searching aside, college-age unemployment would be the perfect time to find an internship (even an unpaid one) in the field where one wants to work. I wonder what it will take to make the twentysomethings realize that they need to act like adults. Perhaps it is a lost cause so long as a child is in the White House and spends more time on vacations than doing HIS job.
highhopes on September 8, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Could it be that you are as dense as a lead block?
The good jobs – the career type jobs – are all claimed already, outsourced, or have a mile-long list of applicants with qualifications my generation can’t possibly hope to match.
I’ve already had to give up on having a good job, probably for the rest of my life, as well as marriage and family. (Can’t feed ‘em, don’t breed em) I discovered the hard way that I stank at computer programming (so much for following in father’s footsteps) and nearly all the techie jobs are long since spoken for, if the greedy pigs in suits haven’t already shipped them to Ching-Ling-Ding-Land.
This leaves the less-desirable jobs. There are literally foot-high stacks of applications from people ranging to those like me to displaced experts trying to pay the mortgage and their food bills. You could crawl in on your hands and knees and spin the biggest sob story ever (I have once or twice), and the competition would still be horrendous.
Dark-Star on September 8, 2009 at 12:52 PM
I think you mean chorelessness!
Jim Treacher on September 8, 2009 at 12:54 PM
It is unfair to paint an entire group with the same brush. It is equally difficult to balance what you claim you’ve been doing with all the stories of individuals who would rather collect unemployment benefits than work jobs they consider “beneath them.” Like it or not, there are “young whippersnappers” who are too picky about the kind of employment they will do. That’s fine so long as they are employed but not so good when it means that government is picking up the check for their funemployment.
highhopes on September 8, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Sorry but if you want to be the perpetual victim, enjoy yourself but understand that none of what you post about your opportunity for gainful employment is true. unless by career-type job you mean one of those union jobs where people without skills are paid in excess of $75/hour (salary and benefits) to turn bolts on an assembly line.
highhopes on September 8, 2009 at 1:06 PM
Dark-Star, are you still young enough to join the military, or the National Guard in your state? The military will give you a career and housing and job training for when you get out. If you’re young enough, it might be just the thing to turn your life around.
(Disclaimer: I myself have never had the honor of serving. I’m “contractor scum” supporting the U.S. military.)
Mary in LA on September 8, 2009 at 1:07 PM
Invested your hopenchange with The Precedent? Welcome to Wee-Wee’s Funemployment House!
ya2daup on September 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM
FIFY
Mallard T. Drake on September 8, 2009 at 1:10 PM
Nice job, bigot. Take your anti-Asian crap somewhere else.
And, maybe, if the union thugs wouldn’t have done their best to slow the growth of the private sector in this country, corporations wouldn’t find it necessary to move to Asia to survive.
PimFortuynsGhost on September 8, 2009 at 1:13 PM
Tell that to someone who
Dark-Star on September 8, 2009 at 1:17 PM
Gah, stupid quotes. Sorry.
Dark-Star on September 8, 2009 at 1:17 PM
Being sent to get shot at in some foreign desert for a corrupt government doesn’t exactly appeal to me. The military is most in need of cannon fodder right now, and that’s what I’ll be used for.
Dark-Star on September 8, 2009 at 1:19 PM
And, maybe, if corporations hadn’t placed profits before the welfare of their own countrymen, they would still be here and have gained a measure of respect for not being such slimeballs?
The whole discussion is academic. The US won’t prevent money from moving out via laws, the free-market system offers NO internal restraints against doing whatever will make the most money, and we as a nation have almost no moral (external) restraints against doing so.
Dark-Star on September 8, 2009 at 1:22 PM
Mary, I know your heart was in the right place but as a Vet, I’ve got to object to your advice in this particular case. Contrary to what John Kerry or Dick Durbin say, the military is not the employer of last resort for stupid people. The military is not a scholarship program either. Dark-Star strikes me as the type who would join for the wrong reasons and then be a hazard to those around him in Afghanistan or Iraq.
highhopes on September 8, 2009 at 1:22 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »