The media strikes (out) again on Jones resignation
posted at 11:45 am on September 6, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
If people relied on the mainstream media, especially print media, to keep up to date on the government, then they must have quite a shock this morning with the resignation of Van Jones. For instance, the New York Times makes its first mention of the Jones controversy this morning — by reporting his resignation:
In a victory for Republicans and the Obama administration’s conservative critics, Van Jones resigned as the White House’s environmental jobs “czar” on Saturday.
Controversy over Mr. Jones’s past comments and affiliations has slowly escalated over several weeks, erupting on Friday with calls for his resignation.
Did the Times report it on Friday? On Saturday? No. Their first print report of any controversy at all over Van Jones came today, in reporting his resignation. The Times does a credible job laying out the more substantial accusations against Jones, but there is a problem here as well:
Appointed as a special adviser for “green jobs” by President Obama, Mr. Jones did not go through the traditional vetting process for administration officials who must be confirmed by the Senate. So it was not until recently that some of Mr. Jones’s past actions received broad airing, including his derogatory statements about Republicans in February and his signature on a 2004 letter suggesting that former President George W. Bush might have knowingly allowed the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to occur in order to use them as a “pre-text to war.”
Mr. Jones’s involvement in the 1990s with a group called Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement prompted recent accusations by conservative critics that he associated with Communists. The group, according to a post-mortem written by some of its founders, was an anti-capitalist, antiwar organization committed to achieving “solidarity among all oppressed peoples” with “direct militant action.”
When did the 9/11 Truther connection come to light? Jim Hoft reported it Thursday, and it flew through the blogosphere. Even more Truther connections came out the next day. When did the New York Times — and to be fair, most other newspapers in the country — get around to reporting in print that a paranoid conspiracy theorist had a job as a White House czar? Today, after he quit.
Byron York gives us the round-up:
Coverage of the Jones controversy was a case study of some of the deep divisions within the media. Fox News’ Glenn Beck devoted program after program to Jones’ past, and a number of conservative blogs were responsible for finding some of Jones’ most inflammatory statements. Yet even as the controversy grew — and even after Jones himself apologized for some of his words — several of the nation’s top media outlets failed to report the story. As late as Friday, as the Jones matter began to boil over, it had not been reported at all in the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the evening newscasts of ABC, CBS, and NBC. Although the Post and CBS went on to report the Jones story on Saturday, the Times did not inform its readers about the Jones matter until after Jones resigned.
So much for speaking truth to power, eh?
This reminds me very much of the lack of coverage given to Eason Jordan’s accusations of deliberate journalist assassinations by the US military in early 2005. Jordan, a vice-president at CNN, made those accusations at a conference in Davos, Switzerland, where he thought Americans would not learn of them. After all, if CNN doesn’t report it, does it really happen? A reporter quoted Jordan and started a firestorm … in the blogosphere and on talk radio, which dug out more outrageous accusations and statements from Jordan. Newspapers couldn’t be bothered to cover it, however — not until Jordan’s resignation from CNN forced them to do so. In that case, the LA Times didn’t report it until almost 48 hours after Jordan resigned, and the New York Times only ran one wire-service report on its website prior to the resignation.
With Jordan, the assumption was that the media didn’t want to eat its own. That same assumption could be made about their reluctance to report on Van Jones. They have beclowned themselves a second time, and now have to answer for their silence in defense of a government official.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
From the AP article:
Yeah, I kinda wish he would have had to publicly defend or repudiate all his “past” statements and associations, and Obama too. Maybe the next few czars won’t go so… quietly.
Fishoutofwater on September 6, 2009 at 12:30 PM
What makes me mad is how the news continue to frame protesters of Obamacare, Van Jones, etc, is how they continue to label us as “Republicans”.
I’ve seen very little party (GOP) activity online or at protests. The Tea Party and Obamacare protest movement is almost entirely organic. Calling us “Republicans” is a misnomer feeds the lunacy on Left and tries to frame us as political partisans.
southsideironworks on September 6, 2009 at 12:30 PM
You and nearly a thousand other former lizards…
What Charles doubled down on was his clozapine dosage…
doriangrey on September 6, 2009 at 12:30 PM
It’s Bush’s fault…oh wait, can’t blame him anymore…so NBC’s headline “Obama Aide Van Jones Resigns After GOP Attacks” – it is the GOP’s fault.
You know they probably will be hesitant to mention Glenn Beck….that may cause their zombie readers to find out what actually happened to the wackie commie. Valerie Jarrett next? I wish we could skip the peons and go right for the big problem….Obama.
njpat on September 6, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Van who?
“All the News That’s Fit To Hint“
profitsbeard on September 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM
LA Times of this morning ignored the story, has done all the way along.
Typical, if appalling, for them.
Harry Schell on September 6, 2009 at 12:34 PM
You mean they aren’t attacking him as someone who quits in the middle of the night?
deadenders on September 6, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Maybe Jones should buy Obama’s books and study up on how Barry was able to fool the Man. In one of the books (can’t recall which) Barry boasts about the tactics he used to get white people to trust him. Then again, Barry himself may need to figure out some new routines, as the old tricks don’t seem to be working too well for him lately.
AZCoyote on September 6, 2009 at 12:35 PM
I saw that list linked over at Ace’s last night. I’m not on it (got the boot back in May). It needs to be updated cause I’m seeing literally dozens getting the boot in the past week.
Knucklehead on September 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM
McChristian, you’re exactly right. I’m as sickened by the traitorous republicans. Now you hear some of them saying they’re concerned about czars. If it weren’t for Beck, Fox, and the bloggers, it would have never made the light of day. Throw them all out.
So funny to hear dems say he’s being smeared. By what-the truth?! ha
texanpride on September 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM
Lol….they don’t attack the libs….he’s the poor victim…we know the drill by now.
njpat on September 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM
New bill proposal H.R. 3226 Czar Accountability and Reform Act of 2009 needs your support.
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3226/show
pjean on September 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM
ABC News
77 W. 66 St., New York, NY 10023
Phone: 212-456-7777
General e-mail: netaudr@abc.com
Nightline: nightline@abcnews.com
20/20: 2020@abc.com
CBS News
524 W. 57 St., New York, NY 10019
Phone: 212-975-4321
Fax: 212-975-1893
Email forms for all CBS news programs
CBS Evening News: evening@cbsnews.com
The Early Show: earlyshow@cbs.com
60 Minutes II: 60m@cbsnews.com
48 Hours: 48hours@cbsnews.com
Face The Nation: ftn@cbsnews.com
CNBC
900 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632
Phone: (201) 735-2622
Fax: (201) 583-5453
Email: info@cnbc.com
CNN
One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta, GA 30303-5366
Phone: 404-827-1500
Fax: 404-827-1784
Email forms for all CNN news programs
Fox News Channel
1211 Ave. of the Americas, New York, NY 10036
Phone: (212) 301-3000
Fax: (212) 301-4229
comments@foxnews.com
List of Email addresses for all Fox News Channel programs
Special Report with Bret Baier: Special@foxnews.com
FOX Report with Shepard Smith: Foxreport@foxnews.com
The O’Reilly Factor: Oreilly@foxnews.com
Hannity: Hannity@foxnews.com,
On the Record with Greta: Ontherecord@foxnews.com
Glenn Beck: GlennBeck@foxnews.com
bucsox79 on September 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM
MSNBC/NBC
30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10112
Phone: (212) 664-4444
Fax: (212) 664-4426
List of Email addresses for all MSNBC/NBC news programs
Dateline NBC: dateline@nbcuni.com
Hardball with Chris Matthews: hardball@msnbc.com
MSNBC Reports with Joe Scarborough: joe@msnbc.com
NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams: nightly@nbc.com
NBC News Today: today@nbc.com
PBS
2100 Crystal Drive, Arlington VA 22202
Phone: 703-739-5000
Fax: 703-739-8458
The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer: newshour@pbs.org
National Radio Programs
National Public Radio
635 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20001-3753
Phone: 202-513-3232
Fax: 202-513-3329
E-mail: Alicia Shephard, Ombudsman ombudsman@npr.org
List of Email addresses for all NPR news programs
The Rush Limbaugh Show
1270 Avenue of the Americas, NY 10020
Phone (on air): 800-282-2882
Fax: 212-445-3963
E-mail: ElRushbo@eibnet.com
Sean Hannity Show
Phone (on air): 800-941-7326
Sean Hannity: 212-613-3800
James Grisham, Producer: 212-613-3807
E-mail: Phil Boyce, Program Director phil.boyce@citcomm.com
National Newspapers
The Los Angeles Times
202 West First Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Phone: 800-528-4637 or 213-237-5000
Fax: 213-237-4712
L.A. Times Contact Information by Department
Letters to the Editor: letters@latimes.com
Readers’ Representative: readers.rep@latimes.com
The New York Times
620 8th Ave., New York, NY 10018
Phone: 212-556-1234
D.C. Bureau phone: 202-862-0300
Fax: 212-556-3690
Letters to the Editor (for publication): letters@nytimes.com
Write to the news editors: news-tips@nytimes.com
Corrections: senioreditor@nytimes.com
New York Times Contact Information by Department
How to Contact New York Times Reporters and Editors
bucsox79 on September 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM
USA Today
7950 Jones Branch Dr., McLean, VA 22108
Phone: 703-854-3400
Fax: 703-854-2078
Letters to the Editor: editor@usatoday.com
Give feedback to USA Today
The Wall Street Journal
200 Liberty St., New York, NY 10281
Phone: 212-416-2000
Fax: 212-416-2658
Letters to the Editor: wsj.ltrs@wsj.com
Comment on News Articles: wsjcontact@dowjones.com
The Washington Post
1150 15th St., NW, Washington, DC 20071
Phone: 202-334-6000
Fax: 202-334-5269
Letters to the Editor: letters@washpost.com
Ombudsman: ombudsman@washpost.com
Contact Washington Post Writers and Editors
Magazines
Newsweek
251 W 57th Street, New York, NY 10019
Phone: 212-445-4000
Fax: 212-445-5068
Letters to the Editor: letters@newsweek.com
Time
Time & Life Bldg., Rockefeller Center, 1271 6th Ave., New York, NY 10020
Phone: 212-522-1212
Fax: 212-522-0003
Letters to the Editor letters@time.com
U.S. News & World Report
1050 Thomas Jefferson St., Washington, DC 20007
Phone: 202-955-2000
Fax: 202-955-2049
Letters to the Editor letters@usnews.com
News Services / Wires
Associated Press
450 West 33rd St., New York, NY 10001
Phone: 212-621-1500
Fax: 212-621-7523
General Questions and Comments: info@ap.org
Partial Contact Information for the Associated Press by Department and Bureau
Reuters
Three Times Square, New York, NY 10036
Telephone: 646-223-4000
Reuters Editorial Feedback
United Press International
1133 19th Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: 202-898-8000
FAX: 202-898-8048
Comments and Tips: tips@upi.com
bucsox79 on September 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM
Sounds like treason to me.
farright on September 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM
You all know exactly what to do with that long list. Spread it over the net, call/email, voice your outrage and concern.
bucsox79 on September 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM
There is nothing more arrogant than the MSM. They think they don’t have to cover this, just like Obama thinks he doesn’t have to follow the Constitution.
Well, there is something just as arrogant and and that is the congress critters in the House and Senate. The handful of them that are true partiots have been emboldened this morning. So have we, the people. Keep on. We have only begun.
BetseyRoss on September 6, 2009 at 12:38 PM
RagTag on September 6, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Comparing office to office, they accomplished a full term abortion on Palin. And to their chagrin, failed to complete the fete accompli as Palin is the political force that just won’t give up. And God bless her.
Van Jones’ has resigned. But Obama has yet to accept his resignation.
And while Van Jones leaves this position, his political career as a communist in American politics is not over, but only just begun with national/international/global recognition thanks to Obama, Soros’ puppet, our bankrupter.
maverick muse on September 6, 2009 at 12:38 PM
I was kicked out of lgf several months back—-just for saying I thought Charles was a closet liberal. Imagine that.
texanpride on September 6, 2009 at 12:38 PM
If you know someone who should be on the list, go tell Kirley, she’ll gladly add them…
doriangrey on September 6, 2009 at 12:38 PM
by jpat
It’s Gore’s fault; he invented this internet.
Pelayo on September 6, 2009 at 12:39 PM
bucsox79 on September 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM
3X stuff it
maverick muse on September 6, 2009 at 12:40 PM
Answer for their silence? Since when Ed? They answer to the White House.
alwaysright43 on September 6, 2009 at 12:40 PM
What has happened to Charles, I wonder? I understand some of the stuff about BNP and the rest…Van Jones dug his own grave long ago though and is a dangerously warped man. That Glenn Beck is over the top emotionally about it doesn’t change the facts about Jones.
Lewinsky and Tripp were and are ugly, but the dress proved who the liar was…and it wasn’t them.
Harry Schell on September 6, 2009 at 12:40 PM
So much for reporting “all the news that’s fit to print.”
MobsterinVA on September 6, 2009 at 12:40 PM
Nah – Beck has just inserted the first lance into a giant, festering, throbbing boil, and the pus and blood has begun to ooze. It will take a while to excise the core, but at least we get to watch the MSM and Obama’s entire Insane Clown Posse convulse with pain as the lance is being worked in, deeper and deeper. Also, the more you squeeze it, the worse it gets. ;^)
Fishoutofwater on September 6, 2009 at 12:41 PM
Sorry, Ed–should be “media strike (out)” “Media” is a plural word.
Or Media are a plural word? heh
itsnotaboutme on September 6, 2009 at 12:41 PM
My guess, very uninformed as it is and strictly personal opinion… Chemical induced psychosis.
doriangrey on September 6, 2009 at 12:43 PM
Welcome to Obama’s Amerika.
jukin on September 6, 2009 at 12:43 PM
When all else fails….go after Palin….that will keep the libs busy today….even though she is now a private citizen.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/09/05/ING219GKJL.DTL
njpat on September 6, 2009 at 12:44 PM
pjean, thanks. I would’ve missed it! Let’s get behind this and give it traction and energy.
H.R.3226 – Czar Accountability and Reform (CZAR) Act of 2009
To provide that appropriated funds may not be used to pay for any salaries or expenses of any task force, council, or similar office which is established by or at the direction of the President and headed by an individual who has been inappropriately appointed to such position (on other than an interim basis), without the advice and consent of the Senate.
Sponsor, Jack Kingston, R-Georgia
maverick muse on September 6, 2009 at 12:45 PM
bucsox79 on September 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM
Awesome, dude. Battlefield coordinates. Thanks for posting all that, it’s going into a “special” folder in my contacts list.
Fishoutofwater on September 6, 2009 at 12:46 PM
Anyone who expects the old media, the democrat propaganda machine, to report the warts on their folk is an idiot…
JIMV on September 6, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Some of the biggest trolls and ass kissers are in charge over there now. Wierd.
VegasRick on September 6, 2009 at 12:47 PM
So, why don’t all the “moderates” and “independents” and other “martyrs” take their little azzes to LGF where they can insult and bash republicans/conservatives all day long and not have to worry about getting any back??
Blake on September 6, 2009 at 12:47 PM
That’s AmeriKKKa if you please!
Obama never skimps on his special K’s.
profitsbeard on September 6, 2009 at 12:48 PM
Fishoutofwater
I’m with you on this one, taking their own radical agenda and using it against them, will make their heads rotate off their shoulders, maybe when they see each one being exposed they will abandon ship like the cowards they are.
God bless Glenn Beck and all the good people exposing this scum in our Whitehouse.
concernedsenior on September 6, 2009 at 12:48 PM
The main stream media can’t stop whitewashing liberals, its like admitting everything they believe in is wrong.
Speakup on September 6, 2009 at 12:52 PM
Cross post from Ace:
And yet another thread @ HotAir ignoring the elephant in the room.
maverick muse on September 6, 2009 at 12:52 PM
The lazy and incompetent Big Media will spin this as a Black Guy had to resign because he called Republicans “a**holes.” What? Hell, Ive called a lot of Republicans “a**holes.” What conservatives haven’t?
And of course, it’s not about his race. It’s about his ideology. Honestly? The item that got me the most P.O.’d was he allegation that “white polluters steered their pollution to the black community.” Hey, Attorney General Holder, let’s have a talk about race and those “white polluters.”
If this is what a Harvard education gets you in today’s education market, somebody done be gettin ripped off.
BigAlSouth on September 6, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Savage is fine right where he’s at…
he’s a worse albatross around our neck than Sam Adams was the patriots until the die was cast.
sven10077 on September 6, 2009 at 12:54 PM
As I posted on another post on Jones, we cannot stop now, ask exactly what Obama knew, and I am sure he knew and agreed with almost if not all. Also, go after all other czars. The GOP needs to push that Congresswoman’s bill (in the house, forget her name) to stop this whole czar nonsense. And the media needs to be forced to cover these stories as they are being forced now and continuing to keep the heat on Obama about Van Jones will force them to cover more.
immigrantchick on September 6, 2009 at 12:55 PM
Can you translate that to English?
VegasRick on September 6, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Bingo!
Beck and the blogs are driving most of this change and not the Republican Congress.
yoda on September 6, 2009 at 12:56 PM
I can’t tell you how many people I’ve told that the MSM is censoring the news…then I give them sites like this and ask them just to read it for one night and tell me what they think…I rarely hear back on it but when I do it’s usually, “Gee I didn’t know I’ve been missing so much!”
Our country is under attack from within. Various groups have aligned themselves for their own reasons to accomplish this… We need a leader to start the fight and the only person I can think of who could do it is Sarah Palin. It’s pretty sad when the only person who has demonstrated the will to fight Obama is a Hockey Mom from AK. The GOP is in deep sh*t. This could be a gold mine for them and there is no one there leading.
CCRWM on September 6, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Remember, MSNBC and NBC which is owned by GE, has a lot of interest in the “green job” stuff.
ms on September 6, 2009 at 12:57 PM
I was yelling the same thing at the TV when Juan said that!
move along now, nothing to see here…
*sugh*
cmsinaz on September 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM
sugh=sigh
cmsinaz on September 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM
cmsinaz on September 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Off topic a bit but part of the whole FIGHT, if we stop Obama on health care overtake, we will stop him on all else that matters. The 2 things that will destroy AMerica are socialized med (co-ops, trigger, or whatever they call it) and amnesty to illegals. I am an immigrant, but illegals from countries where they are raised to hate America and capitalism are unacceptable and the dems know that the only way they can change this country is by bringing in anti-capitalism people in. It all started with Ted Kennedy changing the immigration laws in the 1960s.
immigrantchick on September 6, 2009 at 1:00 PM
When Savage is sane enough not to get ran off the TV in five days time he can be a bigger face for the movement. Until that day comes if ever he is a nice source of data and a good voice in house for the right. Thought the Sam Adams(he wasn’t always just a beer) reset would have conveyed that.
Apologies.
sven10077 on September 6, 2009 at 1:00 PM
My questions:
If Van Johnson, only one of 34 “czars” appointed without advice or consent of the Congress is given THIRTY BILLION DOLLARS to run his little “enviromental green jobs” (newest communist and very socially acceptable cover-up scheme),
A. How and from whom in Congress was Obama given this money to spend on his shadow appointment, without a single objection from anyone?
B. What is the total number of BILLIONS allocated to the 34 czars, and by what constitutional authority do these positions exist, much less receive this obscene funding?
Obama’s little politburo of czars is the real cabinet, doing his real radical dirty work, with untold amounts of OUR MONEY – he has to be stopped.
tigerlily on September 6, 2009 at 1:01 PM
30 billion dollars is about a 100 bucks for every man woman and child in the country….with no oversight.
sven10077 on September 6, 2009 at 1:02 PM
When I lived in a commie country, they were all obsessed with recycling and saving energy to the point where we had a quota at school on how much paper we recycled, so students were forced to take even their parents’ books to meet quota, maybe the book think was part of their plan, less books, less knowledge. Also, I cannot tell you how many times the electricity went out and I was stuck in dark elevators, trying to crawl out with my grandmother. there was never warning. Environmentalism has always been a tool of authoritarians to control people, I wish more Americans were aware of what went on in commie countries and Nazi Germany (a socialist regime).
immigrantchick on September 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM
None needed, and thanks for the clarification.
VegasRick on September 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM
If the Jones hire isn’t it, what’s the last straw before Valerie Jarrett gets the sunlight due her? It’s becoming increasingly clear why Obama’s interest in her appointment to his U.S. Senate seat was so quickly abandoned. After all, why relegate her to a place of relative obscurity (by his standards), when he knew there’d be important recruiting work to be done in his administration? Van Jones may have been a train wreck, but he was no accident.
Barnestormer on September 6, 2009 at 1:04 PM
Is this just a rumor, but I had heard that Obama has only had one Cabinet meeting since taking office? Is this true?
BetseyRoss on September 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM
If true that’s one more meeting he’s had with them than the number of times he has asked for prayers for our troops deployed in any of his speeches.
sven10077 on September 6, 2009 at 1:07 PM
Notice the orchestration, intentional or not.
1. State-run media blacked out the story of the communist in the white house until he resigned.
2. Leftist bloggers take their cue, and many blog posts this morning oddly begin with some variation on the words “I’ll bet you’ve never even heard of this guy whom conservatives find so threatening, blah blah blah.”
Left hand feeds spin to other left hand.
jeff_from_mpls on September 6, 2009 at 1:07 PM
If true, it’s par for the Democrat course.
Bill Clinton met more often with Monica Lewinsky than with the head of the FBI, a perverse reversal of priority which no doubt is in part to blame for the attack on the World Trade Center that occurred under his watch, as well as the one that followed his leaving office in disgrace.
jeff_from_mpls on September 6, 2009 at 1:10 PM
The question has to be asked why MM would have the LGF link especially since she goes on Glenn Beck all the time.
LGF was in support of the Beck boycott which is another reason why the psycho boy CJ is so flustered about Beck taking van jones down. It is self defeating for Malkin to defend this guy.
kangjie on September 6, 2009 at 1:12 PM
H.R.3226 – Czar Accountability and Reform (CZAR) Act of 2009
To provide that appropriated funds may not be used to pay for any salaries or expenses of any task force, council, or similar office which is established by or at the direction of the President and headed by an individual who has been inappropriately appointed to such position (on other than an interim basis), without the advice and consent of the Senate.
Sponsor, Jack Kingston, R-Georgia
maverick muse on September 6, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Didn’t see this when I posted five min. ago. I think it should go further, though. Because the Dem Congress of 2009, if it had to, would give consent to each and every czar, and gladly OK more. No, the bill should read that czars, special advisors, or whatever they want to call them are neither constitutionally nor traditonally part of our democratic Republic and will not exist, period.
tigerlily on September 6, 2009 at 1:12 PM
indypat on September 6, 2009 at 1:15 PM
Last couple of weeks? More like in the last year. His near constant rants about creationism turned me off of him as a daily at least a year ago.
Chuckie is all about “guilt by association”. I was banned merely for following a link from Jihad Watch to LGF when they had their feud. Or maybe it was for modding down something about it at LGF, thereby branding me as a neo-fascist ally of Vlams Belang, or something.
JeffWeimer on September 6, 2009 at 1:18 PM
Evangelical atheism is a joy to watch…
AP is more like an agnostic atheist….
Chuckles is feeling the (theoretical lack of) the Lord
sven10077 on September 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM
EARLY COMMUNIST RULE UNDER MAO
After the proclamation of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, China was ruled by the “Eight Immortals,” which included Mao at the helm and Zhou Enlai and Lin Biao. Under Mao, factories were put under central control, land was taken from landlords and redistributed among peasants, and the population was organized into several million work units under pyramidal central control. In 1953, with inflation brought under control and industrial production restored, Mao launched his first five-year plan, which boosted heavy industry but failed to increase farm productivity.
Once in power, the Communists, who had rebelled against the despotism of the Kuomintang, became despots themselves. Trained as fighters not managers, they became inward-looking, conservative, authoritarian, suspicious of change, corrupt, and suspicious of intellectuals. Repeating a pattern established by the Chinese emperors that preceded him, Mao withdrew China from the international community and the international marketplace. He created a state economy which controlled and owned everything from flower shops to pig farms to munitions factories.
Mao era China was a remote, mysterious, drab place of ration cards, uniforms, Big Brother watchfulness—sort of what North Korea is like today.
Mao Cleans Up China
Mao was very successful in cleaning up the decadent mess left by the Western powers. Almost overnight, Shanghai was given a face lift. Chinese ghettos were torn down, hundreds of thousand of opium addicts were forced into cold turkey and child and slave labor were abolished. In Beijing, the splendid medieval wall with its 44 bastions and 16 gates, was torn down in 1952 to ease traffic congestion.
The opium problem was solved with a declaration that anybody found using it or selling it would be put to death. Severe punishments were also dished for prostitution, helping to virtually eradicate venereal disease. Mao clamped down on wife selling by ordering the keeping of marriage records to discourage the practice. It seemed like the only vice the Communists couldn’t eliminate was smoking. Most party leaders were heavy smokers, and no doubt peasants would have smoked more if they could have afforded it.
Instead of sex and drugs, Communists were encouraged to participate in volunteer public works programs and attend self-criticism sessions. Mao also encouraged people to head off to the frontiers of Tibet, Qinghai and Xinjiang. “A good comrade, he wrote, “is one who is more eager to go where the difficulties are greater.”
Mao thumbed his nose at traditional Chinese culture, undermined traditional scholarship and criticized Confucius for not being a revolutionary.
Order Restored
Describing the scene at Nanjing a few months after the Communist takeover, AP reporter Seymore Topping recalled in the New York Times, “Before long, the prices of daily necessities stabilized. Most shops reopened, as did dance halls. Beggars disappeared from the streets. Censorship was imposed on the local newspapers and radio.”
“University students, enthusiastic about the new government, gathered in public assemblies to sing songs that commissars had taught them with lines like, ‘Reactionaries who exploit the people deserve to be cut into thousands of pieces.’”
“People began grumbling about the new Communist administration. Taxes had risen sharply as the city’s commercial life withered. The local press reported of sabotage of Communist offices in the surrounding countryside…Ideological structures on the universities and other spheres of intellectual life tightened. In schools, factories and municipal offices, study groups were formed to discuss Maoist theory and participants were required to confess ideological sins.”
Land Reform Under Mao
The Communist Party’s greatest legacy arguably has been taking land from wealthy landlords and rich farmers and redistributing it in rural areas among the poorest peasants under the principal of “land of the tiller.” During their struggle to take power, the Communists promised land to the poor. When the Communists came to power they began seizing land from landowners. Land owners that resisted, even those with as little as two thirds of an acre, were often executed.
Farmers classified as “poor peasants” by the Communists were given ownership to land taken away from local landlords and rich farmers. Estates and large farms were divided up. Each family got no more than 1.3 acres. One farmer told the New York Times, “Of course we were extremely happy—everyone was happy we got land!”
The seizure of land was not always easy. In some cases “certain necessary steps” had to be taken and this resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, of people. In many cases villagers were executed or beaten to death by fellow villagers to get their land. See Violence in the Early Years of the People’s Republic Below.
The peasants didn’t hold on to their land for long. By the late 1950s, private land ownership was eliminated and peasants were given usage rights to the land but not ownership. The land from then on was owned by the state. Peasants were organized into mutual aid teams and lower-level cooperatives and then collectives in the early and mid 1950 and became property-less members of “people’s communes.”
Similar scenarios were played in the cities. Rich families who stayed in Shanghai after Communist Revolution were told they had nothing to worry about, but in the end their land and property was expropriated. The Communists also confiscated their art. One Hong Kong art dealer told the New York Times. “The Shanghai museum’s best pieces are all from those private collections.”
Top down economic plans after independence bore fruit. The national income rose at rate of 8.9 percent a year between 1953 and 1957 but created problems down the road. Giving peasants usage rights rather than ownership paved the way for the seizures of land by local officials and businesses which is taking place today. See Land Seizures, Agriculture, Economics
Just sayin………….
sonnyspats1 on September 6, 2009 at 1:24 PM
They. Don’t. Matter. Anymore.
The MSM are on a steep approach. They will have a bumpy landing at around 20% (circulation and share of viewership). I think that is about where the level is for the hardcore, liberal base that will continue to get their news from those outlets.
As shown by the polls the vast majority of the public has moved on to other news sources.
I rabidly await the time when we can start holding solemn (/s) wakes for their passage into bankruptcy.
Yoop on September 6, 2009 at 1:24 PM
Let’s see if the following comment is “fit to print” on the New York Times blog, The Caucus:
September 6, 2009, 9:09 am
The Sunday Word: Vetting Wars, Redux
By Janie Lorber
Trochilus on September 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM
OT, but well worth the read to find out what true Catholic teaching is re: Obamacare.
Bishop Nickless’ article begins at http://www.scdiocese.org/ and continues at http://www.scdiocese.org/Stewardship/healthcare/tabid/416/Default.aspx
tigerlily on September 6, 2009 at 1:26 PM
Thats not quite true..Beck had already started exposing some of the czars,especially jones,before any boycott against Beck happened.Sheesh even Breitbart had that in his article today.Beck went after jones…THen jones group attacked Beck..Then Beck really let jones have it.
theTarCzar on September 6, 2009 at 1:28 PM
If a big enough stink is made out of their complicity they will lose even more subscribers and viewers. Thats capitalism.
They will go the way of Air America and the NYSlimes.
Pour on the email and give them hell.
dogsoldier on September 6, 2009 at 1:31 PM
It’s the same story with the BBC. In June Van Jones was lauded as an “environmental hero” in a softball interview with the BBC’s Matt Frei. Suddenly out of nowhere this morning: “Embattled Obama adviser resigns“.
DDB on September 6, 2009 at 1:33 PM
The msm can not seem to find a a label for the disinters.
How about AMERICANS for open government ie. Citizen who care.
Col.John Wm. Reed on September 6, 2009 at 1:38 PM
Van Jones resigned for the good of the Commune.
Long Live the Glorious Proletarian Revolution!
Anarchists Unite! [sic]
profitsbeard on September 6, 2009 at 1:38 PM
Agreed. The best evidence of which is the absence in the Senate of the normal turf-protecting hue and cry over “checks and balances,” “oversight function,” yadayada…amp. Can you even conceive of this happening in a Republican administration? The heads of Patrick Leahy and his ilk would become more lethal than IEDs.
Prancing with the Czars. Tune in; it’s playing regularly on C-Span.
Barnestormer on September 6, 2009 at 1:38 PM
Thanks for posting all these contacts, I’m working my way through them today.
anniekc on September 6, 2009 at 1:39 PM
Many of them were last spotted standing in the square, in front of the bus, sticking greenish peace flowers in the grill.
Then the bus jolted forward to run over Mr. Van Jones. Reports from the scene are that there were some trolls that got a bit wee-weed up, then squished.
More at 11:00…
Yoop on September 6, 2009 at 1:42 PM
Thanks for posting that link.
whitetop on September 6, 2009 at 1:47 PM
Let’s contact all these MSM traitors for their dishonesty in their reporting (or non-reporting) and let them know there’s a people’s army out here that’s going to take them down at the same time we are taking out the communists in the White House.
silvernana on September 6, 2009 at 1:48 PM
Obama fails again.
Obama could have exacted a modicum of credibility by firing Jones, but gave him the option to resign instead, which he took because resigning is always less terrible than getting fired.
But I would much rather have seen Zero the anti-hero throw Jones completely under the bus, it would have at least made me feel an immeasurably small amount better about Zero’s radicalism and his hatred toward America…molecular sized movement to the positive, but movement none the less.
He decided not to take that route because he is such a narcissist that he thinks Jones radical anti American racist hatred doesn’t reflect on him at all.
The downfall of Zero continues unabated. Now I wish it would just accelerate to the point that he’s either impeached or forced to resign.
Spiritk9 on September 6, 2009 at 1:50 PM
Thank you tigerlily for the information. Is Steve King your Representative? I like him.
yoda on September 6, 2009 at 1:51 PM
A start in making the left accountable. In the words of Nancy Pelosi “drain the swamp”.
hotdax on September 6, 2009 at 1:52 PM
The funny thing about this loser nut is that he graduated from Yale, which says a lot about the quality of education and the quality of the student body at Yale. Nothing but commie, truther idiots.
ThomasB. on September 6, 2009 at 1:55 PM
Van Jones is now one less Rodent of Unusual Size that we have to worry about. Of course, the MSM claims that they do not exist (RUS, that is).
My collie says:
CyberCipher on September 6, 2009 at 1:57 PM
God and Van at Yale?
profitsbeard on September 6, 2009 at 1:57 PM
“I can no more disown Van Jones than I can disown my white grandmother, and she was, uh, um, white. Unlike Van Jones, who is uh, not white. But as I’ve said all along…”
Barnestormer on September 6, 2009 at 1:59 PM
FIFY, NYT.
BacaDog on September 6, 2009 at 2:00 PM
Can we all just agree that it is unfair to report the truth about the Obama Administration? and that people who do so are probably racist?
>sarcasm off<
It’s not enough for Jones to go. There needs to be a spotlight on the rest of the “czars” and the crackpot policies that they’re working to implement in the name of The One.
cruadin on September 6, 2009 at 2:01 PM
Using their own playbook against them is excellent.
The rest of that rule is worth mentioning also.
From Rules for Radicals, rule 13:
Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and ‘frozen.’…
“…any target can always say, ‘Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?’ When your ‘freeze the target,’ you disregard these [rational but distracting] arguments…. Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the ‘others’ come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target…’
“One acts decisively only in the conviction that all the angels are on one side and all the devils on the other.” (pps.127-134)
justltl on September 6, 2009 at 2:04 PM
If a tree falls in the forest, and lands on a NYT reporter, would anyone hear it?
percysunshine on September 6, 2009 at 2:04 PM
Would anyone care?
HornetSting on September 6, 2009 at 2:06 PM
Glenn Beck begged the White House to respond to everything he was reporting and the only thing the white House would complain about was that Glenn was referring to Van Jones as a czar rather than an adviser. Question: was the White House just ignorant to the affect the information would have on the public? Or, were they testing the water to see how or if the Jones information would have an affect on the public figuring that they have so much of the mainstream media in their pocket so very little of the info would really get out to the general public and because of that all this would blow away relatively soon. Or, did the mainstream eventaully say to the WH: look, the story on Jones is getting too big for us to continue to hold it back and still look credible.
ranzofola on September 6, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Obama needs a pair of suspenders…
Suspender of Czars for a start.
And then Suspender of Disinformation.
…coz Barry’s pants are down around his ankles.
profitsbeard on September 6, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Ed, I’m thinkin’ 2012 headline something like “Dewey Wins!” only it says “Obama Wins!” with Sarah Palin holding up the copy of the NYT..
..and everyone in New York saying someting like, “I can’t believe she won; I didn’t know anyone who voted for her.”
So, let them live in their little dream-world echo chamber while the rest of us carry out the business of fomenting a grass roots revolution in this country.
Ooh-rah!
VoyskaPVO on September 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM
The best part of the resignation is the agony the MSM had to go through with having to report on the resignation of one of their own Communist comrades. You know this had to kill them.
Jeff from WI on September 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM
Actually, In this case, I think it is Yale.
CC
CapedConservative on September 6, 2009 at 2:14 PM
The festering toe may have finally fallen off but the body is still rotting due to bad blood. We need to treat and cure the disease and not just the obvious symptoms.
Rod on September 6, 2009 at 2:18 PM
If the last few years of IVY league graduates that went into politics is any indication, I think we’d be better off with the Big Ten, SEC, ACC, Pac 10 or just about anyone else.
Jeff from WI on September 6, 2009 at 2:19 PM
THE NYT mailbox sends this to all y’all.
his is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
nytimeletters@timeinc.com
Col.John Wm. Reed on September 6, 2009 at 2:19 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »