“Meet the Press” finds the big lesson in the Van Jones story: You can’t trust the Internet

posted at 6:24 pm on September 6, 2009 by Allahpundit

You have to see it to believe it. The singular lesson of the past week, after big media failed to uncover Jones’s Truther past and then actively suppressed it when it broke online, is that they can’t be trusted to chase stories that are inconvenient to The One — especially if doing so would burnish Glenn Beck’s credibility. And yet here they are, through two of their priestlier representatives, warning the public that only a fool would play in the “open sewer” that is the Internet, where lies and smears and video clips that the networks won’t show of Obama administration officials calling Republicans “assholes” flow insidiously onward. Plenty of viewers will believe them, too: Remember, for many, their first taste of the Van Jones story came this morning, and no sooner did they hear about it than a trusted figure like Tom Brokaw appeared to dismiss it as a smear campaign. You couldn’t script a more Orwellian ending. Friedman actually goes so far as to call this a cautionary tale about how everyone’s a potential target in the age of mass media. Hey, Tom? He’s a Truther in charge of $60 billion in taxpayer money. We’re not talking about some alderman here who got caught saying something off-color at the Dairy Queen. Quoth Jonah Goldberg: “What a tragedy that fewer people will support cop-killers and anti-American conspiracy groups because of poor Van Jones chilling effect on the culture.”

Oh, and speaking of whitewashes, the White House wants you to believe that they didn’t know about any of it.

A White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter, said Sunday that Jones’s past was not studied as intensively as other advisers because of his relatively low rank.

Jones’s position, for example, did not require Senate confirmation. So he avoided the kind of vetting Cabinet officials were subjected to…

“He was not as thoroughly vetted as other administration officials,” the official said. “It’s fair to say there were unknowns.”

Valerie Jarrett seemed pretty excited about him, so presumably she had an inkling about his past. But even if they’re telling the truth and somehow the multiple-page questionnaire all administration officials are required to fill out wasn’t broad enough to catch, ahem, Trutherism, this is nothing less than a confession by the White House that its czars might very well be unsavory characters with skeletons in their closets. Why vet them if they don’t have to pass the Senate, right? And if you do vet them and conclude that they can’t pass the Senate — as almost certainly happened with Jones — then just make them a czar and the problem is solved. It’s not like Tom Brokaw or Tom Friedman is going to hassle you. Exit quotation from Glenn Beck: “The American people stood up and demanded answers. Instead of providing them, the Administration had Jones resign under cover of darkness.” Click the image to watch.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 5

Orwellian.

elduende on September 6, 2009 at 6:26 PM

“The American people stood up and demanded answers. Instead of providing them, the Administration had Jones resign under cover of darkness.”

Yup.

PoodleSkirt on September 6, 2009 at 6:29 PM

Tom Brokaw, how do you sleep at night?

Never mind. I know. You’re dogshit.

zeebeach on September 6, 2009 at 6:29 PM

Jones’s position, for example, did not require Senate confirmation. So he avoided the kind of vetting Cabinet officials were subjected to…

Actually, it’s like they are basically blaming the ‘Czar system’ for the fact that VJ got past them at all…which may be the most circular-logic based spin I’ve seen yet. It’s retarded.

AUINSC on September 6, 2009 at 6:29 PM

The media is in Obama’s back pocket. Beck stood up and so did great bloggers and Americans against this Orwellian machine.

cubachi on September 6, 2009 at 6:29 PM

Obamian

ignorantapathy on September 6, 2009 at 6:29 PM

I expected this, and to make matters wors they will get away with this scot free. Next week all of this will be forgotten and the drones will move on.
They look right into the camera and lie in the most sincere way.

kangjie on September 6, 2009 at 6:30 PM

When will we find out who overode the Secret Service objection to letting this guy within 100 yards of the Oval office ?

borntoraisehogs on September 6, 2009 at 6:30 PM

That darn internet, what a sewer Al Gore invented!

Jeff from WI on September 6, 2009 at 6:32 PM

It’s Meet The (De)Press(ed) on the National Barack Channel!

What the heck did you expect, for them to actually admit that Van Jones was three french fries shy of a Happy Meal when it came to his POV on virtually everything?

pilamaye on September 6, 2009 at 6:32 PM

Moral of the story: The media has been overrun by left-wing radicals. The journalists have left the building.

faraway on September 6, 2009 at 6:32 PM

Wow. Tom Brokaw says the information people have needs to be “vetted.” Sure. But the president doesn’t have to be vetted, nor his cabinet members.

Do these people even understand just how stupid they sound, lecturing all of us about the dangers of misinformation and how we use it?

HoosierEm on September 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM

Vetting process too “hard” for Democrats to figure out: GOOGLE

Jeff from WI on September 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM

only a fool would play in the “open sewer” that is the Internet

Because people keep catching Obama’s turds floating around there.

Guardian on September 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM

and to top this, NBC will make OlbermanBoy its ‘Evening News” anchormanBoy

Nothing But Crap…….

Janos Hunyadi on September 6, 2009 at 6:34 PM

That sounded like an argument for Obama and Mark Loyd to declare the emergency shutdown of the internet. Only credentialed journalists should be allowed to have an opinion or garner facts.

fourdeucer on September 6, 2009 at 6:34 PM

Who are these people kidding? They knew everything there was to know about this goober-cheese commie long before they brought him in.

Dave R. on September 6, 2009 at 6:34 PM

Actually the “sewer” was blocked with Van Jones but our trusty plumber Beck snaked out that fecal matter.

Jeff from WI on September 6, 2009 at 6:35 PM

Bitter clingers , clinging to old media.

They were really upset they got beaten by the serfs.

the_nile on September 6, 2009 at 6:35 PM

“It’s fair to say there were unknowns.”

I’d say it’s fair to say they were “known unknowns”.

aquaviva on September 6, 2009 at 6:35 PM

I couldn’t read it all. It made me sick and I’m tryin’ t’ eat.

Army Brat on September 6, 2009 at 6:35 PM

Vetting process too “hard” for Democrats to figure out: GOOGLE

Jeff from WI on September 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM

You mean the google?

the_nile on September 6, 2009 at 6:36 PM

Honestly, I thought Tom Brokaw was dead. What is he now, ninety?

Jeff from WI on September 6, 2009 at 6:36 PM

You mean the google?

the_nile on September 6, 2009 at 6:36

Yup..THE google..lol

Jeff from WI on September 6, 2009 at 6:37 PM

Where’s the meat? All rhetoric, no facts. So what else is new? America is waking up.

chipandcharge on September 6, 2009 at 6:37 PM

I wish I could say that I’m shocked and surprised about all of this…but…

The One and crew are only living up to my every expectation, and doing so extraordinarily well.

JetBoy on September 6, 2009 at 6:37 PM

The old media knows their jobs are in jeopardy and they have to justify their existence. The usual suspects will always live in denial.

Long live the new media.

uber-con on September 6, 2009 at 6:38 PM

An open sewer, untreated, unfiltered information.

Judgement not included. Hey Tom (both of ya) we don’t need your stinkin judgement, or opinion, or your filter.

And that’s just driving you nuts….

JeffinOrlando on September 6, 2009 at 6:38 PM

Obamian

ignorantapathy on September 6, 2009 at 6:29 PM

Exactly.

Mommypundit on September 6, 2009 at 6:38 PM

They’re just pathetic hacks-state run media, indeed.

One down, more to go.

texanpride on September 6, 2009 at 6:38 PM

When will we find out who overode the Secret Service objection to letting this guy within 100 yards of the Oval office ?

borntoraisehogs on September 6, 2009 at 6:30 PM

He wasn’t a danger to this president. They agree on needing a revolution of change.

JeffinOrlando on September 6, 2009 at 6:39 PM

So they never admitted Jones was a lost cause – just that the internet is a sewer of information from the Huffington Post

wheels on September 6, 2009 at 6:39 PM

All anyone ever needed to know about Van Jones is:

Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement

The fact that someone who started such a group – which the HuffPo described as “maoist-inspired” – is considered for any position of power is all the indictment one needs, for both Jones and whoever let him pass.

We are well through the looking glass when a guy who started a “revolutionary” maoist group is working in the White House and people claim that they didn’t know about him.

progressoverpeace on September 6, 2009 at 6:41 PM

So teh web needs to be “filtered”? I wonder who they have in mind? We certainly are unable to do so for our selves. At least in their estimation. Elitist aholz.

ronsfi on September 6, 2009 at 6:41 PM

Keep pushing BECK!! Don’t stop with Jones – let’s go after every single czar!!!!!

whatzit2u on September 6, 2009 at 6:41 PM

The liberal media is corrupted to the core. The faster they die the better America will be.

jdun on September 6, 2009 at 6:41 PM

An open sewer, untreated, unfiltered information.

Judgement not included. Hey Tom (both of ya) we don’t need your stinkin judgement, or opinion, or your filter.

And that’s just driving you nuts….

JeffinOrlando on September 6, 2009 at 6:38 PM

There was a lot of projection going on in that video..

the_nile on September 6, 2009 at 6:41 PM

The Onion can’t out-parody those people.

SouthernGent on September 6, 2009 at 6:42 PM

Watching that clip made me thinking of two things:

1) The drive-bys know they’re finished. Think about it. Van Jones was brought down by Glenn Beck and a bunch of bloggers. Obamacare is on the verge of being derailed by so-called “teabaggers” and “astroturfers”. These are ordinary everyday Americans and a handful of conservative commentators defeating The One, the Democrat Party, the radical left, George Soros, and 98% of the media. Not only are we doing it against those kinds of odds, we’re not even being aided by the GOP.

2) The drive-bys’ hypocrisy knows no bounds. These are the same degenerates who read an easily debunked smear on Daily
Kos about Sarah Palin’s down syndrome baby and ran with it as legitimate news. They consider Ariana Huffington a credible journalist. They regularly invite bloggers onto networks like MSDNC and offer them as qualified political pundits. Yet at the same time, they ignored countless online clips and articles during the campaign last year that revealed Obama’s true radical left politics and made no effort to investigate the Van Jones story even after the blogosphere exposed who he really was. If the internet is a sewer of disinformation, it’s only because they’re frequenting the slimy websites and ignoring the reputable ones.

Doughboy on September 6, 2009 at 6:42 PM

LOL Good one.

Hey, Tom? He’s a Truther in charge of $60 billion in taxpayer money. We’re not talking about some alderman here who got caught saying something off-color at the Dairy Queen.

NeoKong on September 6, 2009 at 6:43 PM

Honestly, I thought Tom Brokaw was dead. What is he now, ninety?

Jeff from WI on September 6, 2009 at 6:36 PM

My favorite Tom Brokaw story: after Ray Charles performed at the 1980 Rep. Conv. in Dallas, Brokaw turned to his co-anchor and said, “He’s blind, you know.”

Tom ain’t dead, just brain dead.

itsacookbook on September 6, 2009 at 6:43 PM

They had this same discussion when it was about Sarah Palin, yes?

redzap on September 6, 2009 at 6:44 PM

Brokaw and Friedman look about as happy as I want them to look.

Bwaahaaahaaa!!!!

Rotating like little toy tops, ready to topple.

Pathetic excuses for “journalists”.

And all because they are still stumped and intimidated by the evil Internets (and its mysterious ability to ctrl + alt + delete unvetted losers like Van “L’il Trotsky” Jones).

Excuse me for a final:

Bwaaahaaahaaa!!!!

profitsbeard on September 6, 2009 at 6:44 PM

They had this same discussion when it was about Sarah Palin, yes?

redzap on September 6, 2009 at 6:44 PM

Well , that was completely different , because those were all lies. Had to be reported.

the_nile on September 6, 2009 at 6:45 PM

Tom Brokaw and Tom Friedman losing their grip, dribble by dribble as it were… on one of the Depends networks.

How sad.

TXUS on September 6, 2009 at 6:46 PM

These two fossils rant about disinformation. OK. What was the disinformation in this case? What wasn’t true?

Friedman and Brokaw offer no evidence. They wont even discuss the story itself.

What these unhinged morons are really angry about is that they can no longer control information. They deemed the Jones case a non-story and ignored it. Then it became a story anyway.

RadClown on September 6, 2009 at 6:46 PM

And after that, the MSM wonder why they all are on the verge of bankruptcy…

Maybe the real dangers are not those crazy czars but the MSM itself. They are the enabler.

Antagonist on September 6, 2009 at 6:47 PM

Every modem should come with a surgean general warning.

Like rightwing bloggers and talk radio could be hazardous to your health.

fourdeucer on September 6, 2009 at 6:47 PM

An open sewer, untreated, unfiltered information.

Judgement not included. Hey Tom (both of ya) we don’t need your stinkin judgement, or opinion, or your filter.

And that’s just driving you nuts….

JeffinOrlando on September 6, 2009 at 6:38 PM

Heaven forbid that the unwasheded come to conclusions of their own without Brokaw’s adult supervision. F-’em and feed ‘em fish.

thomasaur on September 6, 2009 at 6:47 PM

er uh ah hello and allow me to be perfectly clear I uh ah uh ah had no idea Van Jones held these ideas I also hold so uh ah…as I have always said, “Van who?”

//Ogabe

sven10077 on September 6, 2009 at 6:47 PM

Think about how crazy this is, step all the way back to over a decade ago.

Tell yourself that Clinton would leave office, shortly after Jihadist would hijack planes with Boxcutters and slame them in WTC and the Pentegon for Global Sharia Law and their Virgins and Paradise and all that stuff…

We man up initially, only for the left to start taking the side of the fruitcakes and the MSM aiding them the whole way along, to the point they basically elect a Radical Leftist POTUS while getting away with campaigning as a Moderate.

Then this Leftist POTUS, 8yrs after 9/11 is nominating “Czars” who call themselves “Communist” and to top it all off is a 9/11 Truther!

God Save Us!

jp on September 6, 2009 at 6:47 PM

Here’s your intellectual elite, folks, waxing and buffing their artificial rules and not a common sense to spare among them, either.

Dusty on September 6, 2009 at 6:48 PM

Tom Brokaw is starting to look like Tim Conway’s “little old man” character.

ppaint on September 6, 2009 at 6:48 PM

Heh, Beck made fools out of them. They know it, and the public certainly does. No credibility, there, Brokaw, you hack. As for Friedman, what a pathetic rant.

Cody1991 on September 6, 2009 at 6:48 PM

Jones’s position, for example, did not require Senate confirmation. So he avoided the kind of vetting Cabinet officials were subjected to…

Thats why we have 31 Czars and 15 cabinet members I guess.

Koa on September 6, 2009 at 6:49 PM

Their just pissed because they got their butts kicked by Beck and other conservative bloggers.

They have to be steaming mad.

Heh

gophergirl on September 6, 2009 at 6:50 PM

Their – They’re

OY bad grammar there

gophergirl on September 6, 2009 at 6:50 PM

Here’s your intellectual elite, folks, waxing and buffing their artificial rules and not a common sense to spare among them, either.

Dusty on September 6, 2009 at 6:48 PM

Van Voorhees VII fits right in.

the_nile on September 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM

Jim over at Gateway Pundit deserves as much credit as Beck.

And I don’t care how they try to cover this up, the man had to quit in the middle of the night on a holiday weekend.

Terrye on September 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM

Next week all of this will be forgotten and the drones will move on.
They look right into the camera and lie in the most sincere way.

kangjie on September 6, 2009 at 6:30

Yes,but how many will be looking back?

katy the mean old lady on September 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM

The way these guys keep blasting that evil-doer Internet, you’d think George Bush invented it instead of Algore.
And isn’t Glenn Beck feeling a bit neglected? I could have sworn he appears on TV occasionally.

Barnestormer on September 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM

1 down, 36 to go. Damn the torpedoes, full steam ahead.

faraway on September 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM

Jones’s position, for example, did not require Senate confirmation. So he avoided the kind of vetting Cabinet officials were subjected to…

Actually, I don’t believe that for a minute…as Jarrett said about VJ when announcing his hire at the nutroots convention…they had been watching him for a long time…it’s just that by using that excuse, they are in effect, making the strongest case for immediately eliminating the Czar system. Which they have no intention of doing.

AUINSC on September 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM

The interent needs filters, eh? Obama’s Information and Regulatory Affairs czar, Cass Sunstein, thinks the First Amendment damages democracy.

And the new FCC Diversity czar, Mark Lloyd, is busy finding a way to fine/fee/tax “non diverisfied” (aka conservative) radio stations to support PBS.

As much as I celebrate Beck’s win over Van Jones, I know it is just the first battle in a very long war.

itsacookbook on September 6, 2009 at 6:52 PM

Bloggers find the big lesson in the Van Jones story:

You can’t trust Meet the Press.

izoneguy on September 6, 2009 at 6:52 PM

[the_nile on September 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM]

LMAO.

Dusty on September 6, 2009 at 6:53 PM

Only months ago the democrats were so proud of how they were able to use the internet to garner the support for Obama. He is the cool techno president. His campaign actively used the internet to blog during the campaign to cultivate the messiah like following.

Now, that the same medium is coming back to be used against him it is all of the sudden a sewer.

Typical.

HoustonRight on September 6, 2009 at 6:53 PM

Who are these people kidding? They knew everything there was to know about this goober-cheese commie long before they brought him in.

Dave R. on September 6, 2009 at 6:34 PM

Be specific ! You mean Obama Bin Laden or Van Helsing Jones?

cableguy615 on September 6, 2009 at 6:53 PM

Actually, I don’t believe that for a minute…as Jarrett said about VJ when announcing his hire at the nutroots convention…they had been watching him for a long time…it’s just that by using that excuse, they are in effect, making the strongest case for immediately eliminating the Czar system. Which they have no intention of doing.

AUINSC on September 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM

They cant win either way , it’s just a lame excuse.

the_nile on September 6, 2009 at 6:53 PM

OT, but related….

The earlier part of the MTP this morning included something else that caught my eye.

In the Axelrod interview, Gregory and Axelrod spent more than a little time discussing Zero’s health care initiative and whether the “private option” would be included, and what that would mean. I’m not sure you have to be conservative to believe that the private option is, or will lead to a socialized health insurance.

Then, the subject turned to Zero’s school session for later in the week. And Axelrod said….

…He’s [Obama] been–he’ll say the same thing he’s been saying to young people throughout his public life, which is that they have control over their own destiny, they have to work hard, they have to study, they have to make–they’re the ones who can make something of their own lives. [my emphasis]

So, on one hand, people facing health care insurance issues can turn to the government to provide a safety net to keep them from harm, yet on the other hand, students “have control over their own destiny”.

So, which is it? Do we have control over our own destinies when we are children in school, but somehow become unable to do that when we are adults facing healthcare questions?

azlibertarian on September 6, 2009 at 6:54 PM

But they’re for an informed electorate!

artist on September 6, 2009 at 6:54 PM

1 down, 36 to go. Damn the torpedoes, full steam ahead.

faraway on September 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM

Mark Lloyd – That is your next target….

http://www.redstate.com/izoneguy/2009/09/06/one-down-and-many-more-to-go/

izoneguy on September 6, 2009 at 6:54 PM

Shame

Streecar on September 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM

Old Obama had a farm, A F L C I O,
And on his farm he had some czars, A F L C I O.
With a czar czar here and a czar czar there,
Here a czar, there a czar, ev’rywhere a czar czar.
Old Obama had a farm, A F L C I O.

faraway on September 6, 2009 at 6:56 PM

They had this same discussion when it was about Sarah Palin, yes?

redzap on September 6, 2009 at 6:44 PM

Just compare this to the glee these same a-holes were knowingly reporting every lie about Palin.

And noting said about Van Jones were a lie.

the_nile on September 6, 2009 at 6:56 PM

This is like the closing scene from a Scobby Doo Cartoon:

If it wasn’t for that pesky Internet, we would have gotten away with this.

kingsjester on September 6, 2009 at 6:57 PM

Scobby=Scooby

kingsjester on September 6, 2009 at 6:57 PM

Notice, too, Giuliani sitting there with that clueless, stupid smile on his face.

As Mayor of NYC at the time, I’m sure he knew all about the federal government’s booby-trapping of the World Trade Towers with explosives so as to start a war. /s

Dusty on September 6, 2009 at 6:57 PM

David Gregory sullies the chair of Tim Russert. Brokaw and Friedman would have at least been challenged by Russert.

thomasaur on September 6, 2009 at 6:58 PM

The elite MSM can’t stand that the proletarians are doing their job. //s

yoda on September 6, 2009 at 6:58 PM

David Gregory, you sir, are no Tim Russert.

faraway on September 6, 2009 at 6:58 PM

What Friedman says is essentially true. But then we’ve learned to become our own sanitation ‘engineers’ and can safely wallow through the muck for sources of clean information.

Sadly for Tom Brokaw and Tom Friedman is that they smell the reek of the cesspool…

and are oblivious that it is their own.

bains on September 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM

An open sewer, untreated, unfiltered information.

Judgement not included. Hey Tom (both of ya) we don’t need your stinkin judgement, or opinion, or your filter.

And that’s just driving you nuts….

JeffinOrlando on September 6, 2009 at 6:38 PM

What’s so hypocritical about NBC doing this? Namely that the same network (and the same show, Meet the Press) several years back made a media star out of that Markos feller.

Josef Goebbels would be proud of all of them.

Del Dolemonte on September 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM

HoustonRight on September 6, 2009 at 6:53 PM

And Valerie Jarrett’s “This must be his house” cheerleading got posted on what, by Kos who? It’s true, you really can’t make this stuff up.

Barnestormer on September 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM

And I don’t care how they try to cover this up, the man had to quit in the middle of the night on a holiday weekend.

You are right. That’s going to be hard to spin. Heh.

mchristian on September 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM

These two fossils rant about disinformation. OK. What was the disinformation in this case? What wasn’t true?

Friedman and Brokaw offer no evidence. They wont even discuss the story itself.

What these unhinged morons are really angry about is that they can no longer control information. They deemed the Jones case a non-story and ignored it. Then it became a story anyway.

RadClown on September 6, 2009 at 6:46 PM

That is exactly what I thought too..did Giuliani say anything about this? Did anyone mention that if it’s all lies where did all the video of him saying it and the petition come from?

I only watch Fox and read conservative blogs…so have no idea who Friedman is…

CCRWM on September 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM

Don’t these celebrity-lite news sources scout the Kos Diaries for story ideas? Don’t some of the more progressive politicians post there? Talk about open-sewered material!

BTW Did Politico pick up on any of the material on Van Jones and run with it, or did it also consider Glenn Back too radioactive?

onlineanalyst on September 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM

Brokaw and Friedman are just angling to be named, respectively, QuibblingStupidity Czar and BlameSomeOneElse Czar.

Shoo-ins.

profitsbeard on September 6, 2009 at 7:00 PM

So Friedman, how carefully did the NYTimes “vet” that story about McCain’s “close relationship” with a lobbyist that had his staffers “concerned”?

When your reporter went fishing for information from Bridget McCain’s high school classmates, to find out about what kind of a mother Cindy McCain was, how carefully was the reporter going to “vet” that?

Wethal on September 6, 2009 at 7:00 PM

Two elitist journalist clowns.

Keep patting yourselves on the back boys, the rest of us out here in internetland will do your work for you.

HAHAHAHA. Brokaw wants information on the internet vetted but doesn’t give a crap about vetting a commie czar controlling 30 billion dollars at the highest levels of our government.

Wow, this just goes to show how far these guys have their heads up Obama’s butt.

fogw on September 6, 2009 at 7:00 PM

faraway on September 6, 2009 at 6:58 PM

GMTA *_*

thomasaur on September 6, 2009 at 7:00 PM

Scobby=Scooby

kingsjester on September 6, 2009 at 6:57 PM

Boomerang, the Cartoon Newtork spinoff, is running a Scooby marathon as I type this-all of the “New Scooby Doo Movies”. Some great guest stars, including Sonny and Cher and Mama Cass Elliott.

Del Dolemonte on September 6, 2009 at 7:01 PM

NBC is the new Kos front man

faraway on September 6, 2009 at 7:01 PM

Tom ain’t dead, just brain dead.

itsacookbook on September 6, 2009 at 6:43 PM

LOL..I hadn’t heard that one…priceless stupidity! Thanks

Jeff from WI on September 6, 2009 at 7:01 PM

You are right. That’s going to be hard to spin. Heh.

mchristian on September 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM

They’re gonna walk away from this as if they were Teddy and Van was Mary Jo.

thomasaur on September 6, 2009 at 7:02 PM

Is Van Jones the first Communist in history to leave the White House?

faraway on September 6, 2009 at 7:03 PM

What Friedman says is essentially true. But then we’ve learned to become our own sanitation ‘engineers’ and can safely wallow through the muck for sources of clean information.

Sadly for Tom Brokaw and Tom Friedman is that they smell the reek of the cesspool…

and are oblivious that it is their own.

bains on September 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM

THEY want to be the vetters, and until the internet, the MSM had the power to filter out anything that didn’t fit their narrative. (As has been noted recently, imagine if Teddy had gone into Chappaquidick Bay in the age of the internet.)

They’ve lost the power, and are taking it hard.

Wethal on September 6, 2009 at 7:04 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 5