Did Rangel pay off Ethics Committee members? Update: WaPo says, “Time to go”

posted at 10:55 am on September 3, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

CBS goes after Charlie Rangel in a big way this morning by probing the embattled House Ways and Means chair over his connections to the very people evaluating his ethics.  The House committee is currently investigating Rangel for a series of false disclosures and tax evasions, but Rangel acts as though he has nothing to fear.  What does he know that we don’t?  CBS follows the money:

CBS 2 HD has learned of more alleged back-door dealings and political power peddling by Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel.

The reigning member of Congress’ top tax committee is apparently “wrangling” other politicos to get him out of his own financial and tax troubles. …

CBS 2 HD has discovered that since ethics probes began last year the 79-year-old congressman has given campaign donations to 119 members of Congress, including three of the five Democrats on the House Ethics Committee who are charged with investigating him.

Charlie’s “angels” on the committee include Congressmen Ben Chandler of Kentucky, G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina and Peter Welch of Vermont. All have received donations from Rangel.

Only Welch had the brains to realize how bad this looks.  He returned Rangel’s money — almost twenty thousand dollars.

This demonstrates the problems of having the House (and Senate) holding its members accountable for their actions.  In theory, it works great.  However, in practice, elected officials on Capitol Hill do plenty of backscratching, and Rangel gets a lot of contributions in defense of a safe seat.  That makes him powerful on the Hill, as he can dole out cash to allies and deny it to foes.  In this particular instance, Rangel is using it to corrupt an Ethics Committee investigation, which would be the height of irony everywhere else but Capitol Hill.

Nancy Pelosi has assured Rangel that he can keep his powerful chair on Ways and Means while Charlie’s Dirty Angels probes his ethics.  Once again, Pelosi delivers a culture of corruption rather than cleaning up Congress.  (via Michelle)

Update: The Washington Post editorial board has heard enough, even before this report:

FOR POLITICIANS with major bad news to release or to make public, there’s no time like the dead of August to do it. The thinking goes that the public won’t remember a thing come September. We hope Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) will have no such luck. His belated revelation of previously unreported income, property and bank accounts demands that he step aside as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. …

Much is expected of elected officials. Much more is expected and demanded of those entrusted with chairmanships and the power that comes with them, especially when it involves the nation’s purse strings. From all that we’ve seen thus far, Mr. Rangel has violated that trust continually and seemingly without care.

This isn’t a new position for them, but the timing of their reminder is excellent.

Update II: Fixed the incorrect link to CBS.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Between this, Van Jones, ACORN, Dodd & Richardson, I’m really having a hard time keeping my breakfast down today.

Chris of Rights on September 3, 2009 at 10:58 AM

including three of the five Democrats on the House Ethics Committee who are charged with investigating him.

Are these guys in “safe districts”? If not, excellent fodder for campaign commercials.

MarkTheGreat on September 3, 2009 at 10:58 AM

Rangel has GOT to go.

UltimateBob on September 3, 2009 at 10:58 AM

Please forgive the off topoic post but
Olympia snowejob needs to be stopped !
Call her office and say you are from Maine and represent a group of seniors against obamacare. It doesn’t matter if you don’t live in Maine. Find a zip code and town name off the net and call her now. Or say you are a moderate dem who voted for her, and you are against obamacare or any public option. We need to burn her local Maine offices as well as Washington. Call her now before she caves to the libs. Call her now!!!!

texaninfidel on September 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM

In an editorial today, the WaPo has called for Rangel to relinquish his chairmanship. Rangel is a one-man swamp.

ICBM on September 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Robbing Paul to pay Peter.

Hi, I’m Paul.

And so are you.

therightscoop on September 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Ethics Committee members paid off.

Talk about irony.

powerpro on September 3, 2009 at 11:00 AM

That first link doesn’t go where you think it goes, I think.

mesquito on September 3, 2009 at 11:00 AM

Just another putrid scum-bag feeding off the people. These turds continue to demonize wealthy free-market business people and entrepreneurs, yet THEY are the sleazy, greedy, criminal element we MUST weed out of the nation’s capital. Combined with the traiterous socialists, it makes for a veritable rat’s nest.

HomeoftheBrave on September 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM

And term limits are bad because…

WashJeff on September 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM

Dear Mr. Rangel,

Please provide the panel with the locations of all your freezers.

Sincerely,

Limerick on September 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM

Ever see pigs come up to the trough……?

Cinday Blackburn on September 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM

But if you call him a dirty corrupt lying feckless lump of lard that makes you part of an unruly, racist mob.

scalleywag on September 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM

This is an embarrassment to the U.S. political system. I imagine his constituents will vote him back into office regardless of the outcome. I am sure he can figure a way to be a congressman from a jail cell.

BioTeachEd on September 3, 2009 at 11:02 AM

Rangel needs to be in jail but he’s a Demoncrap. Can there possibly be a dirtier pos than a tax cheat being the head of the committee that over sees taxes. Talk about balls, just rubs our faces in it and laughs.

jainphx on September 3, 2009 at 11:05 AM

If he were a republican Pelosi would have had him for lunch years ago.

scalleywag on September 3, 2009 at 11:05 AM

Charlie Rangel (R-NY)

The R is for Rangel.

LibTired on September 3, 2009 at 11:05 AM

The Democrat Party generally makes a mockery of ethics and this case is no exception.

But that’s tempered by Democrat’s circus clown like incompetence, so we have that going for us.

Anyone who votes for a Democrat anywhere at anytime, should be receiving a payoff.

Otherwise, they’re just a complete idiot.

NoDonkey on September 3, 2009 at 11:05 AM

Anybody have an extra fine wheel for my grinder? The pitchfork is about ready but I need to hone the tips just a bit more.

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:06 AM

Of course one of the roots of his ethics problems was the building of an annex on the grounds of a cuny school to be named after him. Vain Glorious and crooked, the lot of them.

rob verdi on September 3, 2009 at 11:06 AM

No wonder congress critters never read the bills. They’re too busy making out receipts to each other.

Fletch54 on September 3, 2009 at 11:07 AM

Nancy Pelosi is circling the wagons trying to get every vote she can from being ousted from her job as majority leader of the House.

Obama talks of a new way of doing politics, if so he would suggest to Rangel to resign. Plus he would have his Attorney General investigate him.

The bottom line with this will be Rangel screaming that his enemies are racists.

albill on September 3, 2009 at 11:08 AM

Rangel has GOT to go

to Allenwood for a long, long time…

Mr. Grump on September 3, 2009 at 11:08 AM

CBS 2 HD has learned of more alleged back-door dealings and political power peddling by Democratic (emphasis mine) Rep. Charles Rangel.

Don’t these media people know they’re not supposed to mention the “Democratic” thing.

tgharris on September 3, 2009 at 11:09 AM

texaninfidel on September 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Is flooding every single thread with the same ill advised comment, for days on end, a bannable offense?

If not, it should be.

MarkTheGreat on September 3, 2009 at 11:10 AM

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:06 AM

Too sharp and the tip snaps or the edge chips. Let the surgeons to do incisions. Broad cuts are much more effective, and hurt like hell.

Limerick on September 3, 2009 at 11:10 AM

OT: James Traficant is out of jail.

And on-topic, if the press would do it’s job, this kind of nonsense wouldn’t happen all the time. It’s sad…that’s what they are for.

But they’ve become so partisan that no sin the right commits is too small and nothing the left does is big enough to report.

Asher on September 3, 2009 at 11:11 AM

Don’t you all remember that Democrats don’t pay taxes. That just for the “little” people.

BetseyRoss on September 3, 2009 at 11:11 AM

Obama talks of a new way of doing politics, if so he would suggest to Rangel to resign. Plus he would have his Attorney General investigate him.

albill on September 3, 2009 at 11:08 AM

Hey, that’s not the Charlie Rangel that Obama knew.

tgharris on September 3, 2009 at 11:11 AM

Anyone from Kentucky? For some reason, I’m under the impression that Chandler was planning to run as a Democratic for Bunning’s Senate seat. If so, I can’t believe Kentuckians would favor a candidate who was bought off by a POS like Rangel.

BuckeyeSam on September 3, 2009 at 11:12 AM

But Nancy said she was going to “drain the swamp.” What happened Nancy? We need to flush ALL of the DC scum in next elections. How is our government any less corrupt than say – Russia’s? Exit question: But how is it possible to get term limits for these crooks?

johnnybgood on September 3, 2009 at 11:13 AM

This demonstrates the problems of having the House (and Senate) holding its members accountable for their actions. In theory, it works great. However, in practice, elected officials on Capitol Hill do plenty of backscratching.

Ya think?

Just look at Murtha, that guy has been peddling influence and greasing palms for years to keep his nuts out of the fire.

All this corrupt double dealing just further reinforces the concept that there really needs to be term limits placed on members of the Congress and Senate.

Hellrider on September 3, 2009 at 11:13 AM

Wrong link at the top there Ed.

Knucklehead on September 3, 2009 at 11:13 AM

Limerick on September 3, 2009 at 11:10 AM

See that’s why I always have to defer to your expertise.

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:15 AM

These crooked politicians like Rangel, Obama Pelosi & Reid are such a slap in the face to all of the Soldiers who sacrificed for our freedoms.

They make me want to puke.

Here’s is a great Soldier Tribute that is dead on. Even mentions Obamanism

deedtrader on September 3, 2009 at 11:15 AM

One of the virtues of having a Republican Congress from 1995-2006, and some might say the only virtue, was that criminal scumbags such as Rangel were kept out of power. I hope we can do the same in 2010. It would be worth it for that reason alone, though of course there are many others as well.

jwolf on September 3, 2009 at 11:16 AM

Great case for term limits and lay-citizen representation in Congress, oh, I thought we had that already…

ted c on September 3, 2009 at 11:17 AM

A tax cheat in charge of the tax pople bribing the ethics people in charge of keeping tabs on the tax cheats who are keeping an eye on the tax people.

If this was in a novel, people would mock it as being outrageously implausible.

davidk on September 3, 2009 at 11:17 AM

Is flooding every single thread with the same ill advised comment, for days on end, a bannable offense?

If not, it should be.

MarkTheGreat on September 3, 2009 at 11:10 AM

Amen to that. I thought I was the only one banging my head on the wall every time I see it.

Enough already!

Knucklehead on September 3, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Turn the matter over to the Corruption Czar.
What? We don’t have one?

whitetop on September 3, 2009 at 11:18 AM

At least Rangel is consistent.

hawksruleva on September 3, 2009 at 11:20 AM

Turn the matter over to the Corruption Czar.
What? We don’t have one?

whitetop on September 3, 2009 at 11:18 AM

We may have one, but I think his role is not what you might think ;-)

hawksruleva on September 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM

Why is it that Democrats can do anything, up to and including murder, and all a Republican has to do to be condemned is tap his foot in a bathroom stall?

TXMomof3 on September 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM

It’s none of your g-damn business, Ed.–Charlie Rangel

Good God. I’ll say it for the 100th time. I hope, if America has any sense, that the Democrats get their asses WHOOPED in next year’s elections. This is ridiculous.

NathanG on September 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM

Amen to that. I thought I was the only one banging my head on the wall every time I see it.

Enough already!

Knucklehead on September 3, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Ease up on the bangin’ there sweetheart. Can’t have any swelling or your brown bag won’t fit your head next weekend for the march.

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM

The culture of corruption has reached such critical mass that nothing short of a revolution will set our nation straight.

TheSitRep on September 3, 2009 at 11:22 AM

The reigning member of Congress’ top tax committee is apparently “wrangling” other politicos to get him out of his own financial and tax troubles. …

Another candidate for Obama’s cabinet.

Johan Klaus on September 3, 2009 at 11:23 AM

“Change you can believe in”
The Democrats no longer have to hide their corruption

Guest1.1 on September 3, 2009 at 11:23 AM

Ease up on the bangin’ there sweetheart.

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM

I choked on that one.

TXMomof3 on September 3, 2009 at 11:24 AM

Van’s incremental revolution is obviously already well on its way when it comes to congress. Seems corruption is now so commonplace that few even notice. Moreover the voters defintely forget come election time.

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:25 AM

texaninfidel on September 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Is flooding every single thread with the same ill advised comment, for days on end, a bannable offense?

If not, it should be.

MarkTheGreat on September 3, 2009 at 11:10 AM

To be fair, he is trying to stop the health care bill, and I’m definitely in favor of that. But agreed, that message on every thread may not be the best approach.

Cheating to win is a Democrat model. And I’d put misrepresenting your status as a constituent under that category.

hawksruleva on September 3, 2009 at 11:25 AM

“CBS 2 HD has discovered that since ethics probes began last year the 79-year-old congressman has given campaign donations to 119 members of Congress”

Bear in mind, these campaign donations are most definitely not via Rangel’s income but money from his campaign war chest, money that others have contributed to him. It will be replenished in short order via the Dem Party money mill.

I suppose Rangel is still not taking questions, but in a slightly different vein, when he does, I certainly hope they ask this: How many times, Mr Rangel, have you claimed the capital gains exemption for the sale of a principal residence on your income tax returns?

Maybe it’s also time to ask those on the ethics committee how they view claiming the deduction on a principal residence when such principal residence is not in a representative’s Constitutionally required district for holding office.

Dusty on September 3, 2009 at 11:25 AM

These folks (Dems) seem to be unaware off all the new technology available, they are working under 1970 rules of behavior and ability to be caught. It’s kind of cute in a clueless sort of way.

Cindy Munford on September 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM

In an editorial today, the WaPo has called for Rangel to relinquish his chairmanship. Rangel is a one-man swamp.

ICBM on September 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM

How very bold of the WaPo. Rangel needs to relinquish his liberty for a jail cell.

OK liberal trolls, defend this.

rbj on September 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM

TXMomof3 on September 3, 2009 at 11:24 AM

Good morning!

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM

The House committee is currently investigating Rangel for a series of false disclosures and tax evasions,

The fox guarding the henhouse.

Johan Klaus on September 3, 2009 at 11:27 AM

Can someone explain to me why the media doesn’t beat this story to death until Rangel is forced to step down? Ok, dumb question. The media is as corrupt as the politicians.

But it’s incumbent upon the people to hammer these jerks until they either resign or get voted out. Because the only other alternative is a violent one, and I don’t want to see our country reach that point ever.

Doughboy on September 3, 2009 at 11:27 AM

Good morning!

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM

Good morning to you! We are getting closer…

TXMomof3 on September 3, 2009 at 11:27 AM

I keep telling you that this is going nowhere.

God I hope I am wrong.

drjohn on September 3, 2009 at 11:27 AM

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM

g’morning big guy.

Knucklehead on September 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM

Is the MSM finally waking up?

roux on September 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM

Did Rangel pay off Ethics Committee members? — Isn’t that sort of like asking the question “are politicians crooks”

tarpon on September 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM

Isn’t this the commitee in charge of Social Security, tax laws and medicare? No wonder we are bankrupt.

fourdeucer on September 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM

definition of safest district.

Black politician in black district. “marion barry” come to mind. Crime, conviction, fraud, does not matter.

I know. I am such a racist. But how else do you explain it?

How do you explain Barack Hussein getting 95% of the black vote other than race loyalty.

Only Saddam Hussein beat thos numbers in an election.

CriticalUpdate on September 3, 2009 at 11:29 AM

Donations to ONLY “three of the five Democrats on the House Ethics Committee who are charged with investigating him?”

Oh Boy! The other two Dem clowns are really gonna be pissed when they read about this!

Barb Dwyer on September 3, 2009 at 11:30 AM

The racist idiots in Rangel’s district only care about his corruption because it shows him getting over on “the man”. That’s why they reelect him. He makes them comfortable in their hatred and bigotry. Like other entrenched Democrat scum he will die in office.

SKYFOX on September 3, 2009 at 11:30 AM

Most ethical congress EVAH!

faol on September 3, 2009 at 11:31 AM

Good for the Washington Post Editorial Board.

RushBaby on September 3, 2009 at 11:31 AM

How do you explain Barack Hussein getting 95% of the black vote other than race loyalty.

CriticalUpdate on September 3, 2009 at 11:29 AM

Blacks routinely tell polsters that they vote Democrat 80% of the time.
How they really vote, is not as well known.

MarkTheGreat on September 3, 2009 at 11:31 AM

Update: The Washington Post editorial board has heard enough,

Well, there ya go. If WaPo has had enough, then we should do somethin’!

Rangel’s political expediency has expired for the Left. About time.

conservative pilgrim on September 3, 2009 at 11:32 AM

Please forgive the off topoic post but
Olympia snowejob needs to be stopped !
Call her office and say you are from Maine and represent a group of seniors against obamacare. It doesn’t matter if you don’t live in Maine. Find a zip code and town name off the net and call her now. Or say you are a moderate dem who voted for her, and you are against obamacare or any public option. We need to burn her local Maine offices as well as Washington. Call her now before she caves to the libs. Call her now!!!!

texaninfidel on September 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Are you trying to get a job with ACORN?

mph on September 3, 2009 at 11:32 AM

SSDD

—–
DRAIN the SWAMP!!

cmsinaz on September 3, 2009 at 11:34 AM

Is the MSM finally waking up?

roux on September 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM

Not a chance. They report the most outlandishly egregious stuff in the world from people they deem worthy of sacrifice and use it to show how “fair” they are.

LibTired on September 3, 2009 at 11:35 AM

Charlie should be in an orange jumpsuit. Surrounded by his cronies.

Christian Conservative on September 3, 2009 at 11:35 AM

Nancy Pelosi has her press conferences on Thursdays…will the media ask her about this?

SouthernGent on September 3, 2009 at 11:35 AM

Rangle has petitioned to rename his committee to the By Any Ways and Means

So I guess he is going to ride this out.

WashJeff on September 3, 2009 at 11:35 AM

TXMomof3 on September 3, 2009 at 11:27 AM

Knucklehead on September 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM

Just one you ladies to know that the countdown has begun. Exactly 7 days 2 minutes we will be touching down in DC. Almost feel like a child waiting for Christmas.

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:35 AM

one=want more coffee pls

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM

But since he’ll appear on the Bill O’Reilly show, he’s automatically a “stand-up guy.”

mankai on September 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM

Hmm the Media is eating their own now it seems.

upinak on September 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM

Much is expected of elected officials. Much more is expected and demanded of those entrusted with chairmanships and the power that comes with them, especially when it involves the nation’s purse strings. From all that we’ve seen thus far, Mr. Rangel has violated that trust continually and seemingly without care.

where has WAPO been for the last 2 yrs?

cmsinaz on September 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM

WaPo Update should read: It’s past time to go

ted c on September 3, 2009 at 11:37 AM

Is the MSM finally waking up?

roux on September 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM

CBS 2 HD? That’s not the major network, that’s some local affiliate, right? Local media sometimes blunders into fair reporting.

hawksruleva on September 3, 2009 at 11:37 AM

Hey yall. I need suggestions for quetion to ask my rep Debbie Halvorson tonight.

I dont want to repeat all the logical questions. I want something unique.

send ideas to stealthring at gmail.com please.

CriticalUpdate on September 3, 2009 at 11:37 AM

Update: The Washington Post editorial board has heard enough, even before this report:

Bunch of racists :-)

johnsteele on September 3, 2009 at 11:39 AM

bye bye Charlie, wont say we’ll miss you, or your nasty comments….

VTWaldrup on September 3, 2009 at 11:39 AM

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:35 AM

I cannot wait. The issue with the Obama/child indoctrination attempt gave me more fuel for the fire. My son’s school called today and said that they have decided not to have the kids watch. Score one for TXMomof3 (plus all the other outraged parents).

TXMomof3 on September 3, 2009 at 11:39 AM

Obama and Pelosi will soon give Rangel a “great service to your country” award of some kind and all will be forgotten.

albill on September 3, 2009 at 11:40 AM

I sent faxes to both Chandler and Butterfield saying that I saw the report on CBS, and asking if they would be returning the contributions that Rangel made to them,

I closed by saying that the media and I would be watching carefully how they vote on Rangel’s investigation.

If they get a lot of these kinds of messages, they may think twice about voting to clear Charlie.

Chandler:
Phone: (202) 225-4706
Fax: (202) 225-2122

Butterfield:
Phone: (202) 225-3101
Fax: (202) 225-3354

sultanp on September 3, 2009 at 11:40 AM

definition of safest district.

Black politician in black district. “marion barry” come to mind. Crime, conviction, fraud, does not matter.

Not necessarily… there is that one extreme leftist from TN who represents a predominantly black district… he is Jewish… and in an ironic twist, he wasn’t allowed to join the Congressional Black Caucus… which is supposed to represent the “needs” of blacks (not the people from the districts that elected them, I suppose).

mankai on September 3, 2009 at 11:40 AM

Rangel–Rotten to the core.

mobydutch on September 3, 2009 at 11:40 AM

My son’s school called today and said that they have decided not to have the kids watch. Score one for TXMomof3 (plus all the other outraged parents).

TXMomof3 on September 3, 2009 at 11:39 AM

You gotta love our state! GREAT JOB!

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:41 AM

Maybe this could help?

http://www.federalismamendment.com/index.html

Onward Forward and Upward!!

RoxanneH on September 3, 2009 at 11:41 AM

Another case of the fox watching the chickens. Rangel should go, and the committee members that accepted political donations should go as well. But then that would require Democrats to have ethics and we all know how that works…

rukiddingme on September 3, 2009 at 11:42 AM

You mean to tell me?! he is a cheating, lying, power hungry democrat! WOW, simply amazing. I thought Obama and the Democrats were saints.

Tremmy on September 3, 2009 at 11:43 AM

Perp walk this thug

Wade on September 3, 2009 at 11:43 AM

Good Tx. Mom!!! This is just another example of the One trying to cause confusion and split the country.

mobydutch on September 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM

The Dems are realizing that they need some housecleaning before 2010… things aren’t looking to great and they can spare a 79-year-old guy from a safe district. If they get him out now, they eliminate one issue and can claim they are acting on “ethics.”

mankai on September 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM

Comment pages: 1 2