Did Rangel pay off Ethics Committee members? Update: WaPo says, “Time to go”

posted at 10:55 am on September 3, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

CBS goes after Charlie Rangel in a big way this morning by probing the embattled House Ways and Means chair over his connections to the very people evaluating his ethics.  The House committee is currently investigating Rangel for a series of false disclosures and tax evasions, but Rangel acts as though he has nothing to fear.  What does he know that we don’t?  CBS follows the money:

CBS 2 HD has learned of more alleged back-door dealings and political power peddling by Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel.

The reigning member of Congress’ top tax committee is apparently “wrangling” other politicos to get him out of his own financial and tax troubles. …

CBS 2 HD has discovered that since ethics probes began last year the 79-year-old congressman has given campaign donations to 119 members of Congress, including three of the five Democrats on the House Ethics Committee who are charged with investigating him.

Charlie’s “angels” on the committee include Congressmen Ben Chandler of Kentucky, G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina and Peter Welch of Vermont. All have received donations from Rangel.

Only Welch had the brains to realize how bad this looks.  He returned Rangel’s money — almost twenty thousand dollars.

This demonstrates the problems of having the House (and Senate) holding its members accountable for their actions.  In theory, it works great.  However, in practice, elected officials on Capitol Hill do plenty of backscratching, and Rangel gets a lot of contributions in defense of a safe seat.  That makes him powerful on the Hill, as he can dole out cash to allies and deny it to foes.  In this particular instance, Rangel is using it to corrupt an Ethics Committee investigation, which would be the height of irony everywhere else but Capitol Hill.

Nancy Pelosi has assured Rangel that he can keep his powerful chair on Ways and Means while Charlie’s Dirty Angels probes his ethics.  Once again, Pelosi delivers a culture of corruption rather than cleaning up Congress.  (via Michelle)

Update: The Washington Post editorial board has heard enough, even before this report:

FOR POLITICIANS with major bad news to release or to make public, there’s no time like the dead of August to do it. The thinking goes that the public won’t remember a thing come September. We hope Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) will have no such luck. His belated revelation of previously unreported income, property and bank accounts demands that he step aside as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. …

Much is expected of elected officials. Much more is expected and demanded of those entrusted with chairmanships and the power that comes with them, especially when it involves the nation’s purse strings. From all that we’ve seen thus far, Mr. Rangel has violated that trust continually and seemingly without care.

This isn’t a new position for them, but the timing of their reminder is excellent.

Update II: Fixed the incorrect link to CBS.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

too great”

mankai on September 3, 2009 at 11:45 AM


Much is expected of elected officials. Much more is expected and demanded of those entrusted with chairmanships and the power that comes with them, especially when it involves the nation’s purse strings.

WaPo Pansies

So, a Ways and Means chairman who is a tax cheat is simply a bridge too far for the WaPo? I wonder what their editorial position was on Timmy “TurboTax” Geithner being appointed as the effing Secretary of the Treasury?

Jaibones on September 3, 2009 at 11:45 AM

PS Why does the Washington Post hate black congressmen?

Jaibones on September 3, 2009 at 11:46 AM

And the Obama machine is scratching their heads wondering why Obamacare isn’t gaining any traction.

It’s because the American people don’t want crooks like Rangel sitting in Washington on this board or that committee making life or death decisions for us. It’s that simple.

UltimateBob on September 3, 2009 at 11:46 AM

HoustonRight on September 3, 2009 at 11:35 AM

I can’t wait either. This is gonna be great.

And OT……

Fox is pounding away at this Van Jones story this morning.

Knucklehead on September 3, 2009 at 11:46 AM

I am Rangel,
Hear me Roar,
With Tax Fraud to Ignore

(sung to Helen Reddy’s “I am Woman”

BobMbx on September 3, 2009 at 11:46 AM

Wait for it…..one…..two…..three…..YOU BUNCH OF REDNECK RACISTS!

GarandFan on September 3, 2009 at 11:47 AM

Well, it’s good that this isn’t part of the “culture of corruption”.

Just an isolated case. Most Democrats are squeaky clean.

And they’ll stay that way, because Pelosi might furrow her brow or something.

But they won’t lose their job, privileges or anything. But Pelosi will be disappointed with them, so that should be enough.

NoDonkey on September 3, 2009 at 11:51 AM

Some Lib: “You racist!”

Me: *POWPOWPOW!*

*wakes up* Aww, it was all just a dream! T_T

Orange Doorhinge on September 3, 2009 at 11:51 AM

Follow the money….

joedoe on September 3, 2009 at 11:51 AM

“Please forgive the off topoic post but
Olympia snowejob needs to be stopped !
Call her office and say you are from Maine and represent a group of seniors against obamacare. It doesn’t matter if you don’t live in Maine. Find a zip code and town name off the net and call her now. Or say you are a moderate dem who voted for her, and you are against obamacare or any public option. We need to burn her local Maine offices as well as Washington. Call her now before she caves to the libs. Call her now!!!!

texaninfidel on September 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM”

No, don’t lie about where you live. That would make us no better than acorn members.

Call her office by all means and call your Senators and Representatives. Call the RNC and let them know that if Olympia backstabs us again that the RNC had better disown her.

But DO NOT MISREPRESENT YOURSELF!

jpmn on September 3, 2009 at 11:52 AM

Treat this man with the same justice you would a white man in his position, and he’ll be gone from public service and off spending his stolen, tax cheated loot.

He should spend time behind bars.

Hening on September 3, 2009 at 11:53 AM

Only Welch had the brains to realize how bad this looks. He returned Rangel’s money — almost twenty thousand dollars.

Question:
How can one politician give money to another in excess of the normal cap on donations?

Count to 10 on September 3, 2009 at 11:54 AM

Man I wish the midterms were this November!

NathanG on September 3, 2009 at 11:55 AM

I get more and more disgusted at the actions of Congress every day.

KevinFnLshow on September 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM

I always hear about the corruption that is rampant in many countries.

How is the U.S.A. Any different? Pathetic.

bridgetown on September 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM

Are Rangel’s financial disclosure forms actually disclosed to anyone besides his colleagues in the House? Anyone seen any link to them?

Dusty on September 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM

Hey, GOP, Mr. Steele…

GET ON IT. Start making campaign commercials!

bridgetown on September 3, 2009 at 11:58 AM

If this isn’t the first time WaPo has called for his resignation of position, then one has to question the horsepower of the WaPo to move opinion. Maybe there’s a credibility issue here….. Just askin’…

ted c on September 3, 2009 at 11:59 AM

DITTO!!!!!

huskerdiva on September 3, 2009 at 11:59 AM

He is not going anywhere. If he were to step down as Chairman, Pete Stark would get it and he is hated by everyone. Also, Rangel can win re-election until he is sipping meat through a straw, no matter what he does.

tatersalad on September 3, 2009 at 11:59 AM

The arrogance to STAY is the astonishing part. THEY HAVE NO SHAME! It’s surreal.

marklmail on September 3, 2009 at 11:59 AM

Rangel needs to be Wrangled,
Out of Public Trust.
In this the land of the Star Spangled,
His service has been a Bust…

DL13 on September 3, 2009 at 11:59 AM

From all that we’ve seen thus far, Mr. Rangel has violated that trust continually and seemingly without care.

Cynic that I am, I cannot assume they are putting Rangel on the ‘B’ list because he betrayed the public trust. It could be as much he put a fly in the ointment being used to smooth the Obama railroad

entagor on September 3, 2009 at 12:00 PM

Question:
How can one politician give money to another in excess of the normal cap on donations?

[Count to 10 on September 3, 2009 at 11:54 AM]

Rangel’s contributions are not personal campaign donations. They are transfers from one politician’s campaign war chest to another’s.

Dusty on September 3, 2009 at 12:01 PM

Madam Speaker? Care to comment?

JeffinOrlando on September 3, 2009 at 12:01 PM

Where in the hell is the IRS on this,do they actually audit the wons buddies or just tax paying schmucks.

Col.John Wm. Reed on September 3, 2009 at 12:01 PM

I’m shocked that WaPo is even reporting on it.

orlandocajun on September 3, 2009 at 12:03 PM

So the Washington Post is calling for this guy to step down?

Or else what?

Will the Washington Post withhold it’s endorsement of scores of Democrats next election season? Please.

Will they call on Nancy Pelosi to step down? Very doubtful.

Will they call on the leader of the Democrat Party, Barack Obama, to call on Rangel to step down?

Like that would ever happen. The last thing Obama needs is the wrath of the Congressional Black Caucus, who knows where HIS skeletons are buried.

They made him and they can break him.

NoDonkey on September 3, 2009 at 12:03 PM

Which begs the question; Is Rangle on the list of offshore tax cheats or possibly one of those on the Suisse Bank list?

elclynn on September 3, 2009 at 12:03 PM

“Once again, Pelosi delivers a culture of corruption rather than cleaning up Congress.”

You know…

… If someone had access to the Internet, and ever heard of a thing called “YouTube”, I think there is a pretty good campaign commercial in there some where.

Seven Percent Solution on September 3, 2009 at 12:06 PM

Where in the hell is the IRS on this,do they actually audit the wons buddies or just tax paying schmucks.
Col.John Wm. Reed on September 3, 2009 at 12:01 PM

Sir,
Please read this from the National Taxpayers Union. The IRS prepares congress’ taxes at our expense.

http://www.ntu.org/main/page.php?PageID=22

Respectfully,

milwife88 on September 3, 2009 at 12:08 PM

I’m shocked that WaPo is even reporting on it.

orlandocajun on September 3, 2009 at 12:03 PM

Nonsense. The shocker here is that they are speaking ill of a Democrat. Were this a Republican, it would be front page stuff (like the current attempt at defaming the Republican in Virginia’s gubenatorial race).

highhopes on September 3, 2009 at 12:11 PM

Flush
The
Toilet
Now.

If any of these corrupt scumbags end up retaining office in 2010, we will need another kind of purge in this country, sooner than later.

Either way, I think it’s coming and I don’t think anyone in this country is going to be immune to it’s effects on way or another. We’re in for some awful times.

All thanks to the moronic republicans that screwed us on the “contract with America” and the rather stupid voters that put zero the anti-hero in office. Personally, I hope these voters suffer the worst.

Spiritk9 on September 3, 2009 at 12:15 PM

Doesn’t make any difference!

He’s black .
He’s racist .

Therefore is is immune to any prosecution.

bluegrass on September 3, 2009 at 12:16 PM

Some New York attorney should get a search warrant for Rangel’s freezer–they might find a lot of cold cash.

Steve Z on September 3, 2009 at 12:19 PM

Why don’t you mind your Go**mned business!”- Charlie Rangel

portlandon on September 3, 2009 at 12:19 PM

“Rangel can win re-election until he is sipping meat through a straw.”

Come, come. Why should that matter to Democrat voters? It hasn’t mattered with Robert Byrd.

(Actually, the rumor in these parts is that Byrd has been dead for years, and that they just stuffed him and propped him up for the last election. I’m not saying the rumor is true, mind you, but OTOH, if the Democrats can have dead voters, why not dead candidates?)

wolfie on September 3, 2009 at 12:20 PM

OK liberal trolls, defend this.

rbj on September 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM

“Laura Bush killed somebody with her car!”

simplesimon343

Del Dolemonte on September 3, 2009 at 12:23 PM

I still want Schumer investigated for “nudging” IndyMac into failing overnight.

Connie on September 3, 2009 at 12:30 PM

If true that Rangel paid off the other members of the committee, Not ONLY should Rangel be gone, but the other members as well. I think taking Bribes is still a crime.

PappaMac on September 3, 2009 at 12:30 PM

Reporting bribes is racist!

jukin on September 3, 2009 at 12:45 PM

If the WaPo is publicly speaking out, its gotta be even worse than we think.

T

his demonstrates the problems of having the House (and Senate) holding its members accountable for their actions. In theory, it works great.

Uh, not even in theory, IMHO. Thats why an outside agency needs to do this. Politicians act only for political purposes and defend their own interests. The liberals especially protect those of the same ideology over the rule of law.

Look how Pelosi fought to protect the congressman caught with bribe money in his freezer.

dogsoldier on September 3, 2009 at 12:45 PM

Rangel has been lobbying for his job.

ICBM on September 3, 2009 at 12:47 PM

texaninfidel on September 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM

I thought there was a rule about posting multiple same posting on threads. WE GET THE MESSAGE, PLEASE STOP.

lovingmyUSA on September 3, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Is flooding every single thread with the same ill advised comment, for days on end, a bannable offense?

If not, it should be.

MarkTheGreat on September 3, 2009 at 11:10 AM

Amen to that. I thought I was the only one banging my head on the wall every time I see it.

Enough already!

Knucklehead on September 3, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Sorry, didn’t know you had posted something–I think we have given this guy enough rope…

lovingmyUSA on September 3, 2009 at 12:59 PM

Pelosi sees nothing wrong with Rangel’s behavior…

d1carter on September 3, 2009 at 1:00 PM

What a nightmare.

Fuquay Steve on September 3, 2009 at 1:06 PM

Fox had something on this morning about Rangle’s staff not paying THEIR taxes either, but I can’t find a link–I know I heard it–it dated back to 2006…Don’t ANY democrapic congress people pay their taxes?

lovingmyUSA on September 3, 2009 at 1:06 PM

tatersalad – I’m not convinced having Stark run Ways and Means would be a bad thing.

Rangel’s an enrichez-vous kind of guy, crooked as the day is long but no ideologue.

Pete Stark is a top-drawer nutcase and putting him in an important chairmanship would substantially ratchet up the chaos level. He’d be his own Comedy Central show.

JEM on September 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM

Hey Eric, how about an independent investigator to look into this fraud. Oh wait a minute, those are done to the Bush administration officals or CIA.

generouse on September 3, 2009 at 1:09 PM

The Teaparty at the Alamo is a resounding success.

I saw exactly one counter-protestor in a blue SEIU shirt.

Too hot for them.

NoDonkey on September 3, 2009 at 1:14 PM

tatersalad – I’m not convinced having Stark run Ways and Means would be a bad thing.

Rangel’s an enrichez-vous kind of guy, crooked as the day is long but no ideologue.

Pete Stark is a top-drawer nutcase and putting him in an important chairmanship would substantially ratchet up the chaos level. He’d be his own Comedy Central show.

JEM on September 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM

Good point, but Stark can’t be controlled, so he is an unacceptable alternative. By Pelosi saving Rangel’s arse o n this, he becomes more ‘loyal’ to the Speaker. It’s all about power and the ability to advance the agenda.

tatersalad on September 3, 2009 at 1:14 PM

because Pelosi might furrow her brow or something.

That’s impossible.

Missy on September 3, 2009 at 1:15 PM

Mr. Rangel has violated that trust continually and seemingly without care.

Rangel Response: “Mind your own Damn Business”

Give the Caddy up now…….

BigMike252 on September 3, 2009 at 1:26 PM

Rangel is a lying scumbag and needs to have his ass shown the door.

SmallGovtGuy on September 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Rangel is a lying scumdouchebag and needs to have his ass shown thrown out the door.

SmallGovtGuy on September 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM

There, that’s better. :)

NathanG on September 3, 2009 at 1:46 PM

Million. Buck. Chuck.

juanito on September 3, 2009 at 1:49 PM

I also wonder why this story didn’t get as much play as it should have.

crosspatch on September 3, 2009 at 1:51 PM

He needs to join former Louisiana lawmaker William Jefferson in federal prison.

TrickyDick on September 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM

Compare and contrast:

Ted Stevens … prosecuted for not reporting income.
Charlie Rangel … maintains leadership of Ways and Means after not reporting income.

crosspatch on September 3, 2009 at 1:57 PM

Vote the tax cheating bum out!

MCGIRV on September 3, 2009 at 2:03 PM

It’s time to rename Cholly Rangle “Boss Hogg”.

greasywrench on September 3, 2009 at 2:05 PM

I’m really getting tired of government of the congress, by the congress, and for the congress.

That’s not the way the Founders laid things out and it will destroy this nation if it’s allowed to continue.

Toss ‘em all out!

techno_barbarian on September 3, 2009 at 2:06 PM

I think a democrat would have to be caught shooting wolves from a plane with a bazooka..ALONG SIDE SARAH PALIN…before they’d ever get the boot.Stealing?Fraud?Murder?Rape? nahhh.

theTarCzar on September 3, 2009 at 2:16 PM

Go Green! Recycle Congress!

ornery_independent on September 3, 2009 at 2:38 PM

Ole Charlie ain’t goin’ nowhere, and he sure as hell isn’t gonna let a bunch of racist crackers tell him he shoulda paid his taxes.

Rational Thought on September 3, 2009 at 3:14 PM

The House is a National disgrace–and either they don’t know it or they do and don’t care. If the world refuses to take us seriously in the future, it’ll be no surprise. Look what our leadership has become.

jeanie on September 3, 2009 at 3:17 PM

The arrogance to STAY is the astonishing part. THEY HAVE NO SHAME! It’s surreal.

Where do you think the “entitlement mentality” starts?

chickasaw42 on September 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM

He’s being picked on and lied about by those darn racists again.

Jeff from WI on September 3, 2009 at 3:22 PM

Rangel needs to be in jail but he’s a Demoncrap. Can there possibly be a dirtier pos than a tax cheat being the head of the committee that over sees taxes. Talk about balls, just rubs our faces in it and laughs.
jainphx on September 3, 2009 at 11:05 AM

Think Tim Geithner….

metric on September 3, 2009 at 3:40 PM

Or Ted Kennedy

bluegrass on September 3, 2009 at 4:00 PM

Seems to me, one of the things we can do to prevent this corruption in the future is force Congress to pass laws that they can’t shovel their own campaign funds over to other politicians’ campaigns. This is just a tactic that they have to bring cash over from safe seats and skirt the campaign laws that limit contributions (dollar amount wise). This act alone of him spreading his campaign cash out over 119 other Democrats is just so offensive that I am speechless.

Seems to me this is an issue that the Republicans can add to a new contract with america, if they had any brains for the next election cycle.

karenhasfreedom on September 3, 2009 at 4:27 PM

culture of corruption personafide!

FloridaMike on September 3, 2009 at 4:39 PM

How can these bags of festering excrement like Rangel live to be 79 years old and still be in office? We need Term Limits and we need an age cap. We have age caps on Airline Pilots, why not Politicians? Someone needs to push this idiot down a flight of stairs, three or four times.

mrpeabody on September 3, 2009 at 5:26 PM

At least he didn’t kill anybody.

Oh, who am I kidding? That doesn’t matter either. Maybe WaPo coming out against him will do some damage, but unless Nazi Pelosi demands it based on the probability of losing her job, he isn’t going anywhere, unless the FBI does it.

Vashta.Nerada on September 3, 2009 at 5:30 PM

Maybe I’m missing something here, but why is Charlie hearing the bus wheels? He has always seemed as Dragon-Skinned as say, a Bawney Fwank.

Just askin’.

Seems there is more fat in the fire, than smoke in the kitchen.

paragon27x on September 3, 2009 at 6:04 PM

Rangel should be in jail! Is there not ONE Democrat in the House that will stand up to this tax cheater?

I’m sick and tired of CROOKS like Rangel stealing from our country.

TN Mom on September 3, 2009 at 7:23 PM

All I can say to WaPo and CBS:

NAME THAT PARTY!!!!

TheAlamos on September 3, 2009 at 8:17 PM

Be careful what you wish for. Get rid of bottom-feeding Rangel, and you get a fresh bucket of sewage in Pete Stark. This is one case when we have to hold our collective nose, and swallow our disgust for this gravelly-voiced orangutan.

Elessar on September 3, 2009 at 8:34 PM

Why hold our nose!!! Kick his ass out…another crook will follow but you don’t ignore one problem because another scumbag in waiting in the wings…

JohnD9207 on September 3, 2009 at 8:49 PM

He ain’t heavy, he’s my brother!!
Marion Barry ring a bell?

chickasaw42 on September 3, 2009 at 8:59 PM

I love me some Charley Rangel still in office and still in his Committee Chairmanship. Please, DEMs, keep him in!

Red State State of Mind on September 3, 2009 at 9:04 PM

Just Hold On One Second There, Bubba!

We are discussing the possibility of a Democrat doing the honorable thing? I mean, A Democrat?!?!

ROTFLMAOKABTF!

Yeah, and pigs will fly now that The One is running the Communist Party. LMAO!

DannoJyd on September 3, 2009 at 9:10 PM

Why hold our nose!!! Kick his ass out…another crook will follow but you don’t ignore one problem because another scumbag in waiting in the wings…

JohnD9207 on September 3, 2009 at 8:49 PM

Depends on whether the second scumbag is worse than the first one….cutting off your nose to spite your face??

The hesitation one might have in replacing Rangel with Stark reveals the depth of the corruption, incompetence, and simple stupidity that runs rampant in the democratic leadership. Peel off the first layer and the gangrenous infection starts to ooze out.

Elessar on September 3, 2009 at 9:16 PM

You mean he doesn’t fall back in his quick wit and soothing voice?

Jim Treacher on September 4, 2009 at 12:40 AM

Time for Rangel to go? Sure it is. But that’s what we said about Nancy Pelosi after she called the CIA a bunch of liars and she’s still there.

Amy Proctor on September 4, 2009 at 3:29 AM

Nothing to see here, just move along!

Herb on September 4, 2009 at 12:07 PM

Jaibones on September 3, 2009 at 11:46 AM

Because they’re secretly conservative Republicans!
/s

Al in St. Lou on September 4, 2009 at 2:11 PM

Comment pages: 1 2