New RNC ad: Medicare forever, baby

posted at 6:15 pm on September 1, 2009 by Allahpundit

Via HuffPo’s Jason Linkins, who’s averaging around one ironic exclamation point per paragraph these days. I’m haunted by the Ghost of Medicare Future every time Steele talks about this, but The One’s numbers are so low among seniors and his promises not to cut Medicare benefits so transparently bogus that the GOP really has no choice. Think of this as an attempt to set up a little “death panel” for the Democrats’ reelection chances, with grandma and grandpa seated on the other side of the table.

Can people raised on the New Deal really be counted on to oppose the mother of utopian statist programs? Maybe — considering that many seniors today actually weren’t raised on it:

We are inclined to imagine our oldest citizens as products of the New Deal, voters whose earliest memories engendered a lasting faith in the goodness of government. But conservative theorists like Karl Rove used to say that time was on the side of Republicans where the elderly were concerned, because Depression-era memories would someday give way to a more complicated historical legacy — and perhaps, in this narrow respect, their grand predictions had some validity. If Obama has little of Bill Clinton’s appeal to old folks, it’s probably because old folks now aren’t the same ones who rode volunteer-driven vans to the polls in 1992.

After all, a 70-year-old American today, born in 1939, probably has no personal memory of F.D.R., but he would have lived through the pain of disappearing manufacturing jobs and family farms, and the rapid deterioration of urban neighborhoods and schools, conditions unabated by government experiments in welfare and public housing. Wooed by Ronald Reagan during their prime earning years, these voters may not be nearly as sympathetic to Obama’s vision of activist government as Democrats might have assumed. For these new senior citizens, even the Social Security and Medicare on which they often rely may be viewed less as instruments of beneficent government than as a partial repayment for decades of taxes.

Indeed, which is just one reason why this ad will sting a few years from now when we have to have a chat with granny about Medicare’s insolvency. In the meantime, carpe diem. Incidentally, given the conventional wisdom that one of the reasons Obama did badly with seniors last November was old-school racism, it’s interesting that Steele chose to pitch this himself instead of farming it out to some white underling. I’m glad he did.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

It says alot about the incompetence of the Democrats that the Republicans can make an ad like this with a straight face.

Chuck Schick on September 1, 2009 at 6:18 PM

In the meantime, carpe diem

more like carpe telum

upinak on September 1, 2009 at 6:19 PM

Awesome, so now we are the old people entitlement party.

Really, what’s the difference between democrats and republicans? Hand outs to the young or hand outs to the old?

Just sick…

jhffmn on September 1, 2009 at 6:19 PM

Indeed, which is just one reason why this ad will sting a few years from now when we have to have a chat with granny about Medicare’s insolvency

Not our problem. Sit back and let those brave Democrats eat the sh!t coming their way.

Apologetic California on September 1, 2009 at 6:19 PM

Republicans: Fiscal responsibility

*chuckle* *rolls eyes*

Oh well. Take what you can get, I suppose. Preach socialism-lite Steele!

lorien1973 on September 1, 2009 at 6:20 PM

Pandering. GOP style.

Fletch54 on September 1, 2009 at 6:21 PM

I just think that an honest discussion with people on social security and medicare (and its insolvency) would not be doom like people think it would be. Why not give honesty a shot? Just once. Let’s try it.

lorien1973 on September 1, 2009 at 6:21 PM

I’m so sick of the GOP I could puke. This is how they “seize the day”? Good God.

rrpjr on September 1, 2009 at 6:22 PM

Smart politics, but why do I feel so dirty?

blankminde on September 1, 2009 at 6:23 PM

Calling Glenn Beck!
What is Steele thinking?!
All these government programs are in the red. They are unsustainable. So the GOP wants to lie to get votes. Please GOP, don’t belittle people. Everyone young and old knows what the hell is going on.

cubachi on September 1, 2009 at 6:23 PM

GOP still not getting it.

BadgerHawk on September 1, 2009 at 6:24 PM

Indeed, which is just one reason why this ad will sting a few years from now when we have to have a chat with granny about Medicare’s insolvency

It should not hurt that bad, this is just a bill of rights to address the most egregious and fear inducing parts of the bill.

We will have to reduce benefits, but we can save alot of money by increasing competition in the insurance market and lowering overall costs.

Theworldisnotenough on September 1, 2009 at 6:24 PM

blankminde on September 1, 2009 at 6:23 PM

Cuz it’s a lie. Medicare; the game is over. Same with social security. At some point, there has to be an honest discussion about this reality with people.

Discuss the end game. People will get their tax money back, on a curve, where some people get screwed a little (the younger people mainly) but that everyone needs to learn to rely on themselves for their retirement.

It has to happen.

lorien1973 on September 1, 2009 at 6:24 PM

More proof that you guys inevitably submit to logic. It just takes awhile.

crr6 on September 1, 2009 at 6:25 PM

I’m embarrassed by this. We have high schoolers running both parties.

genso on September 1, 2009 at 6:26 PM

Me likey…

Seven Percent Solution on September 1, 2009 at 6:26 PM

Dammit, Michael, this is stupid.

This reeks of the Democrats circa 2003-2004. The Republicans are circling the bowl, but they’re far too idiotic to do anything about it.

Red Cloud on September 1, 2009 at 6:26 PM

Think of this as an attempt to set up a little “death panel” for the Democrats’ reelection chances, with grandma and grandpa seated on the other side of the table.

And all but puts the final nail in the coffin of the program ever being reformed. Both parties are now in the position of having to ride MediCare until it crashes.

BadgerHawk on September 1, 2009 at 6:26 PM

In the meantime, carpe diem
more like carpe telum

upinak on September 1, 2009 at 6:19 PM

Carpe Dumb. Seize the Idiots!
/stupid democrats.

Key West Reader on September 1, 2009 at 6:26 PM

In the meantime, carpe diem.

As much as I hate Medi-whatev, I have to agree with AP’s point.

We conservatives have too often been all or nothing. We need to take a page from the Dhimmicrat palybook, the one on incrementalism.

davidk on September 1, 2009 at 6:26 PM

This ad was not a good idea.

I don’t mind trying to get seniors on our side against ObamaCare, but we cannot be tethered together for the long haul on Medicare.

myrenovations on September 1, 2009 at 6:27 PM

Indeed, which is just one reason why this ad will sting a few years from now when we have to have a chat with granny about Medicare’s insolvency

Ah, but at the moment it’s the Dem’s problem to either admit that Medicare is going down, or suffer in indignant silence. Either way it’s always enjoyable to watch them fall all over themselves to try and spin it.

anniekc on September 1, 2009 at 6:28 PM

Are there ANY people in politics with brains?

sheesh

bridgetown on September 1, 2009 at 6:28 PM

As someone zooming towards that era of my life I would love it if people would discuss the coming situation honestly and give some ideas on what alternatives to be put in place while I still have the ability to direct funds. I am not sure what lengths the government will go to, to save these programs. I need some pointers from Mr. Rangel on where to hide some bucks.

Cindy Munford on September 1, 2009 at 6:28 PM

Once again, the GOP accepts the Dems premise and tweaks it a bit. *sigh* Playing defense again.

It may be expediently “smart” politics, but in the end only reinforces why the majority of Americans don’t like/trust/(fill in the blank) politicians or their handlers.

conservative pilgrim on September 1, 2009 at 6:29 PM

Medicare has what? 40 trillion in unfunded liabilities according the the debt clock.

If we get to a point in American politics, where young is pit against old, fighting for their entitlements. I’m voting against the old.

They gave us SS and Medicare in the first place.

jhffmn on September 1, 2009 at 6:29 PM

I need some pointers from Mr. Rangel on where to hide some bucks.

Cindy Munford on September 1, 2009 at 6:28 PM

See that would have been a better ad.

lorien1973 on September 1, 2009 at 6:29 PM

A well done ad.

Needs to be flooded into purple states with a senator up in 2010 and all purple congressional districts with high senior voter turnout.

When the enemy’s on the run, run them to the ground or run over them.

TXUS on September 1, 2009 at 6:29 PM

I’m so sick of the GOP I could puke. This is how they “seize the day”? Good God.

rrpjr on September 1, 2009 at 6:22 PM

What is Steele thinking?!
All these government programs are in the red. They are unsustainable. So the GOP wants to lie to get votes. Please GOP, don’t belittle people. Everyone young and old knows what the hell is going on.

cubachi on September 1, 2009 at 6:23 PM

GOP still not getting it.

BadgerHawk on September 1, 2009 at 6:24 PM

Um, what am I missing here? Why is everyone mad at this?? Steele (and Allah) are right — IN THEORY, medicare/soc security is something you THEORETICALLY pay into your entire working life, then reap the benefits at 65 (or 68 1/2 or whatever it’s up to now)

You wanna fix medicare? Ok, fix it. But you won’t be DENYING or CUTTING medicare to the current crop of seniors, because LEGALLY, thats breaking the theoretical promise made to them from decades of FICA taxes

What’s the problem? He’s not advocating “medicare for 23 year olds”, he’s saying “hands off the seniors”.

Wanna have a discussion about unfunded liabilities glenn beck style? Do it. But do it to the group that will see a change, aka the 20-30 year olds. Tell them “you can forsake FICA takes for the rest of your life, but you’ll have to pay for 5 more years and never see a dime of it”, etc. something like that. but again, its about the YOUNGINGS not the OLD PEOPLE

Everyone is acting like you’re worried about falling market value of your neighborhoods when you’re 95 and would never sell the house. Who cares? medicare will NOT be fixed by tinkering with seniors. it WILL be fixed by tinkering (eliminating) it with YOUNGSTERS

take breaths~

battleoflepanto1571 on September 1, 2009 at 6:29 PM

Fianlly!! Steele gets it! Great ad. Looks like Steele has been reading the polls and MAY even know about the 9/12 march on DC.

Nelsa on September 1, 2009 at 6:30 PM

More proof that you guys inevitably submit to logic. It just takes awhile.

crr6 on September 1, 2009 at 6:25 PM

What’s logical about an unsustainable entitlement program that will inevitably bankrupt the country?

That seems to be more feeling, or possibly faith, based.

BadgerHawk on September 1, 2009 at 6:30 PM

Republicans still don’t get it.

beatcanvas on September 1, 2009 at 6:30 PM

This is a REALLY BAD approach. Folks: it’s time to start ‘fessing up and admit that anybody under 55 is just plain screwed when it comes to Medicare. THE MONEY JUST ISN’T THERE!

Of course, a few people started talking about it a while back, as pointed out in this transcript.

michaelo on September 1, 2009 at 6:30 PM

It will be interesting what Levin has to say about this… I understand Steele’s angle here, but he’s being disingenuous to seniors. This whole program must be overhauled and Steele is clearly looking at short term gain. I hope he has the big picture in mind.. Stop the monstrosity first and reform later. Sigh… why do I have this feeling the latter will never come….

davek70 on September 1, 2009 at 6:31 PM

don’t mind trying to get seniors on our side against ObamaCare, but we cannot be tethered together for the long haul on Medicare.

myrenovations on September 1, 2009 at 6:27 PM

First things first; Whatever it takes to clean house in Washington. Starting with the big White one.

anniekc on September 1, 2009 at 6:31 PM

As someone zooming towards that era of my life I would love it if people would discuss the coming situation honestly and give some ideas on what alternatives to be put in place while I still have the ability to direct funds. I am not sure what lengths the government will go to, to save these programs. I need some pointers from Mr. Rangel on where to hide some bucks.

Cindy Munford on September 1, 2009 at 6:28 PM

Cindy, I’ve read your comments enough to believe that you know the answer. Don’t depend on the government. Find your own solution. In this particular case, the only options to fix Medicare is to cut the program way down, roll it into a public plan, or expect high taxes for generations. Or a combination of all. It is dead.

genso on September 1, 2009 at 6:32 PM

Attended a Town Hall last week with the Conservative opponent of our current Dem congress critter. While answering a question about the 300 – 500 billion in cuts to Medicare coming he made the statement that people needed to be weaned off of Medicare and Social Security over a period of time. He received a standing ovation for this. Interestingly enough all the seniors attending were part of those involved with the standing ovation. There were a few younger people sitting and frowning but no elders. It may not sting as much as AP thinks.

chemman on September 1, 2009 at 6:34 PM

Tell them “you can forsake FICA takes for the rest of your life, but you’ll have to pay for 5 more years and never see a dime of it”, etc. something like that.

battleoflepanto1571 on September 1, 2009 at 6:29 PM

Deal. And your point is well made. But this kind of ‘say whatever it takes to win’ is disturbing, and one of the reasons 3/4 of conservatives don’t feel like the GOP represents them.

The GOP and the DNC are both taking the country in the same direction. The only different is one is coasting and the other has the gas pedal buried.

BadgerHawk on September 1, 2009 at 6:34 PM

I just think that an honest discussion with people on social security and medicare (and its insolvency) would not be doom like people think it would be. Why not give honesty a shot? Just once. Let’s try it.

lorien1973 on September 1, 2009 at 6:21 PM

My parents are, I think, like a lot of old folks. (They are in their eighties.)

They see Medicare as an essential lifeline. Their medical expenses are so high that they see no other way out but for the gov. to do it.

If we are going to have this discussion with them, and I agree that we need to have it, we will need to assure them that we are not going to let them die/starve/go homeless.

I would like nothing better than to rid our children of the scourge of paying for social progams. But we need to move very carefully.

davidk on September 1, 2009 at 6:34 PM

DNC: race-baiters. RNC: age-baiters.

blankminde on September 1, 2009 at 6:38 PM

In the meantime, carpe diem

more like carpe telum

upinak on September 1, 2009 at 6:19 PM

Ok, stop that right now….

BigWyo on September 1, 2009 at 6:38 PM

hey I feel your confusion. I was a liberal Dem and now I am rooting for big Tobacco to win their suit against the govt; trying to kill the health care bill; and now looking to the GOP to save Medicare from cuts; through the looking glass but wherever I land there have to be peeps there who love America. On the GOP side I havent had to even think about it I have never met an anti American GOPer, but lots and lots of anti American progressives and Dems nowadays….

ginaswo on September 1, 2009 at 6:40 PM

Are there ANY people in politics with brains?

sheesh

bridgetown on September 1, 2009 at 6:28 PM

No, sorry.

Key West Reader on September 1, 2009 at 6:40 PM

I think the ad works. I like it. Also, Michael Steele is growing on me. Will Allahpundit and Ace take back their calls for Steele to be fired?

terryannonline on September 1, 2009 at 6:41 PM

Everytime he brings this up it is qualified: “No cuts in Medicare to pay for new government programs.” Every. Single. Time.

DaveS on September 1, 2009 at 6:42 PM

CWforFreedom on September 1, 2009 at 6:41 PM

Waiting for the Beck post from AP on this. It’s what we don’t know the WH is doing that’s really beginning to scare me.

genso on September 1, 2009 at 6:43 PM

The GOP and the DNC are both taking the country in the same direction. The only different is one is coasting and the other has the gas pedal buried.

BadgerHawk on September 1, 2009 at 6:34 PM

That is the point all conservatives and libertarians need to understand.

chemman on September 1, 2009 at 6:43 PM

when is the GOP going to hire some savvy media types? Is it just that savvy media types are ideologically opposed? WTF guys… c’mon….

liquidflorian on September 1, 2009 at 6:45 PM

Key West Reader on September 1, 2009 at 6:26 PM
BigWyo on September 1, 2009 at 6:38 PM

why stop? I am Seizing my Guns!

upinak on September 1, 2009 at 6:45 PM

The ad works well. But as mentioned above: “No cuts in Medicare to pay for new government programs.” is a bit weasley worded.

PC14 on September 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM

My parents are, I think, like a lot of old folks. (They are in their eighties.)

They see Medicare as an essential lifeline. Their medical expenses are so high that they see no other way out but for the gov. to do it.

And they didn’t save any money? They weren’t smart and open up IRAs? Savings Accounts?

Let me introduce you to my two grandparents. They were born in the late 1920s early 1930s. He served in the Navy for six months before getting a hardship discharge in the last year of the war.

He worked his entire adult life for Bell South, working 70+ hours a week and she was a teachers assistant/substitude teacher/special education teacher. They built their own home in the country on 11+ acres of land.

They had enough money in their 50s/60s to take off for a month or more and travel the American Northwest, Canada and Alaska. He has healthcare pension, so does she. They seldom rely on the Federal Government. Not even food stamps. They grow and buy their own food even at this late stage in their life because they were responsible and saved their money. They were always active. Their home is a two story home and they are usually up and down those steps 10 times or more every single day.

For the record, he made about 20 dollars an hour and she made probably 36,000 a year if she was lucky. No one has to help them. Hell, when he was 70 I watched him strip the van’s engine out, rebuild it and put it back in. By himself.

The people who think government servies are essential do not know how to live.

Holger on September 1, 2009 at 6:52 PM

The ad works well.

It does. Michael Steele is very comfortable in front of camera.

terryannonline on September 1, 2009 at 6:53 PM

I am Seizing my Guns!

upinak on September 1, 2009 at 6:45 PM

This your weapon
This is your gun
Your weapon’s for killing
Your gun is for fun
(or something like that)

thomasaur on September 1, 2009 at 6:54 PM

AFTER ALL THEY’VE EARNED IT! YEAH!!! THATS what I’m talkin bout baby!!!

sonnyspats1 on September 1, 2009 at 6:58 PM

thomasaur on September 1, 2009 at 6:54 PM

Good God, this site is getting so obscene…

I feel faint…..

BigWyo on September 1, 2009 at 7:01 PM

First things first; Whatever it takes to clean house in Washington. Starting with the big White one.

anniekc on September 1, 2009 at 6:31 PM

Yeah, we heard that back in 2000 too.

Fletch54 on September 1, 2009 at 7:04 PM

Attention RNC commercial director and production people:

Please take Mr. Steele over to LensCrafters and let them adjust his glasses. They are not sitting evenly and he looks like my friends in the high school A/V club.

IMAGE !!!!

Thanks

crom on September 1, 2009 at 7:06 PM

One. Battle. At. A. Time.

First stop fascist boy from gutting our health care system and gutting medicare to do so.

THEN fix medicare. I wouldn’t advocate eliminating it even though yes indeed it is a socialist program, however, it’s a socialist program that was meant to compliment social security which by the way was not meant as a retirement fund but to be a supplement to your retirement fund…..another half assed idea turned socialist almost immediately.

You can’t go after medicare right off and expect to win senior support. Same with social security.

Look, the liberals have been taking baby steps implementing socialist policy since the early 1900s, they quickened the pace in the 70s, and when suckbama was elected they got a boner and over-reached. We need to make it work for us, but not over reach at the same time.

Baby steps are too small, but obliterating SS and medicare is too much at once. Concentrate on getting rid of the commies in office, then lets fix things.

Spiritk9 on September 1, 2009 at 7:07 PM

Yeah, we heard that back in 2000 too.

Fletch54 on September 1, 2009 at 7:04 PM

+∞

Holger on September 1, 2009 at 7:09 PM

A Senior Bill of Rights??
We already have a Bill of Rights for crying out loud!! What about that one!!! It’s being shredded right before our eyes and this is the Republican response??!! Another Bill of Rights,,, but this time just for Seniors???
He’s admitting we lost the battle on the first set of rights so he’s coming back and asking “Hey,, how bout one just for Seniors then?? Would that be OK?”
Obama and the Dems are melting our nation and the Pubs could not think of a single idea for a commercial other than this!!
If the Pubs win back congress it’ll be in spite of themselves,, not because of anything clever they’ve done!!!

JellyToast on September 1, 2009 at 7:12 PM

I heard someone say it somewhere,,, the people will have to drag the Republicans kicking and screaming across the victory line!! There seems to be no other way!

JellyToast on September 1, 2009 at 7:13 PM

I really couldn’t pass up on the chance to say that Steele missed his calling as a TV ad spokesman. Unfortunately, that’s the best I’ve ever seen him.

pcpower1 on September 1, 2009 at 7:13 PM

Between the democrats and republicans we’ll have to rewrite the definition of stupid.

Lonetown on September 1, 2009 at 7:14 PM

There is no solution to Social Security or Medicare. They cannot co-exist with private options because the two programs, by their very nature, crowd out private options.

We can argue all day long about how we might “fix” the two programs, but we’re having the wrong argument. The real argument is this…our government simply cannot be trusted with this much money and power over our lives. Therefore it must be taken away from them.

The two programs must be phased out. Current beneficiaries as well as those who have insufficient time or ability to provide for themselves would continue to receive benefits. People who do have sufficient time to provide for themselves (say those 40 and under) will have to say goodbye to what they’ve put in, but will no longer have to see those taxes withheld.

I’m in my mid-30s, and I can tell you that I would gladly give up the thousands of dollars I’ve had taken from me and thrown into the Social Security/Medicare sinkhole in exchange for not having to contribute a dime going forward.

TheMightyMonarch on September 1, 2009 at 7:15 PM

Politics is war… conservatives must understand that if we want to convince the masses that entitlements for seniors are not a good thing… lets do it by telling our neighbors and friends one by one. DO not expect the GOP to be political machine and prophet/philosopher at the same time. We gotta fight to win

conservador on September 1, 2009 at 7:16 PM

Waiting for the Beck post from AP on this. It’s what we don’t know the WH is doing that’s really beginning to scare me.

genso on September 1, 2009 at 6:43 PM

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pcourrielche/2009/08/31/contradictions-are-revealing-politicizing-the-nea/

davidk on September 1, 2009 at 7:17 PM

I think the ad works. I like it. Also, Michael Steele is growing on me. Will Allahpundit and Ace take back their calls for Steele to be fired?

terryannonline on September 1, 2009 at 6:41 PM

I agree.

Didn’t a lot of seniors vote for Obama because they thought the Republicans were going to take away Social Security and Medicare? What’s wrong with a little reassurance?

redridinghood on September 1, 2009 at 7:17 PM

Um.. You purist dum dums..

This ad is not about the Long-Term validity of Medicare.. it’s about stopping the Federal usurpation of the whole entire damn medical field.

My God you people are so obnoxious with your caterwauling.

And whoever complained about the impact of this in a few years.. in a few years no one is going to freakin remember one stupid ad.

Christ

VinceP1974 on September 1, 2009 at 7:19 PM

davidk on September 1, 2009 at 7:17 PM

Thanks for the link..

genso on September 1, 2009 at 7:23 PM

One of the reasons I said it’s about time in my previous post is because the NRSC annointed Charlie Crist for US Senate in Florida.

Now “The Boss” as she is affectionatley known, has called Charlie Crist a LOSER!!!
I love it.

Nelsa on September 1, 2009 at 7:23 PM

Aw jeez. This morning I looked at O’s poll numbers and starting feeling optimistic. Leave it to Allah and Steele to slap me back to reality.

No matter which way we turn, we’re screwed.

ElectricPhase on September 1, 2009 at 7:30 PM

genso on September 1, 2009 at 6:32 PM

I do know not to count on the government but I don’t trust the government not to roll IRA’s and/or 401K’s into social security. That seems absurd but these folks don’t seem to have much in the way of scruples.

Cindy Munford on September 1, 2009 at 7:40 PM

You mean Republican figureheads like Steele and most others are unprincipled hacks? I’m shocked.

The Dean on September 1, 2009 at 7:43 PM

Cindy

IIRC Melodie Barnes who runs policy at the WH suggested doing just that, rolling IRAs tohgether and redistibuting them

if anyone can confirm.deny pls do, nothing stays on GOOG anymore..but I recall one of TOTUS advisers going to the Hill in the last 2 years and suggesting that to a Panel as an option..

so it isnt far fetched at all

ginaswo on September 1, 2009 at 7:45 PM

Holger on September 1, 2009 at 6:52 PM

You talkin’ about my Mama?

No they didn’t have an IRA. IRAs weren’t around then. Yeah, Dad has a pension, but my Mom does not. She stayed at home and raised five kids.

Savings accounts? Yeah, but something always seemed to come up that needed fixing: a furnace, a car, a kid. Although my dad worked 10-12 hours a day, 6-7 days a week, the factory didn’t pay that much. And company provided insurance didn’t come till later.

Your attitude just shows your ignorance. Stuff happens to people. Some their fault, some somebody else’s fault, some nobody’s fault. (And I’m not just talking about my parents.)

Back then people felt like they could trust their government. They thought that when the gov. told them it was like insurance they believed it. When the gov. told them that it would protect the money they payed into social security, they believed it.

A lot of people back in the day were naive. They didn’t know about ponzi schemes. They didn’t realize that people everywhere weren’t like the people they lived around, people who’s word was their bond.

When I got out on my own, a local businessman told me, “Your dad is cantankerous as hell, but he pays his bills.”

And that’s what my parents expect from the government.

I made it plain that I don’t agree with government social programs. But to tell people, “This program is not right, so we are going to end it next week.” is not only moraly wrong but also cruel.

If the governement defaults on their obligation to my parents they will be OK. They have five children with spouses and their own children who all are successful and would never let them do without.

And if you have to ask why don’t we do it now, you’ll only betray ignorance of the mindset of that generation. They would dare take a handout.

And they don’t see Medi-whatev or SS as a handout–they see it as their money which the gov. has an obligation to pay back.

That is why we talked above about talking to them about these issues. We need to educate them on what the real cost of these programs is. But to belittle them and mock them as you have will not work.

davidk on September 1, 2009 at 7:51 PM

Another interest group gets a bill of rights. What Steele should have been saying is, “Why would you morons allow the government to do anything with everyone’s healthcare after the mess they’ve made with Medicare. How about we ask government to fix Medicare first. They should show us they can fix one thing, anything, before we so much as let them manage the congressional cafeteria.”
 
Second, I’ve had it with Republicans who are not conservative. At least with the democrats, we see how bad their policies are within months or years. The republicans will just slow-boil us over a decade or two. In either case, our goose is cooked.
 
The government trough is surrounded by Donkeys and Elephants.

ClanDerson on September 1, 2009 at 7:56 PM

Democrats:

Healthcare is a right!

Republicans:

Healthcare is not a right!*

* except for the elderly. In fact, it’s in the “Senior’s bill of rights(tm)!”

jhffmn on September 1, 2009 at 8:08 PM

For these new senior citizens, even the Social Security and Medicare on which they often rely may be viewed less as instruments of beneficent government than as a partial repayment for decades of taxes.

We are all selfish in our innermost selves. Those wanting universal healthcare want it for themselves, and they want someone else to pay for it. I’ve paid for someone else’s benefits for years under Social Security and Medicare, and my big question is when it’s my turn, what will I get for all those years of paying for the previous people?

I do not want to pay more — they’ve made me pay more for years. I want to pay

unclesmrgol on September 1, 2009 at 8:11 PM

pandering to the gimme crowd… egads, both these parties suck

painfulTruthDisciple on September 1, 2009 at 8:14 PM

davidk on September 1, 2009 at 7:51 PM

Agree, However, not all seniors have children who can help out. Many would surly be out on the street if SS were just stopped. My wife and I are on medicare and we pay $80 a month for drug coverage. In addition we pay $450 a month for supplemental insurance to medicare (Blue Cross).

If the government wants to give me a lump sum payment (with interest) for the money I was forced to pay in over my 40 years working for the promise of SS and health care, I would be glad to accept.

I was a fool to believe them. If a were 20 and not 70 I would not care and would plan to provide for myself.

I think the ad was great. Please remember that senior vote. If they had not voted for BO in the last election he would not be President. There votes could change the House and Senate in the 2010 election. As a conservative who wants the Libs OUT, I say Thanks for the great AD. Its the first thing the RNC has done right in a long time.

derft on September 1, 2009 at 8:16 PM

And if you have to ask why don’t we do it now, you’ll only betray ignorance of the mindset of that generation. They would dare take a handout.

And they don’t see Medi-whatev or SS as a handout–they see it as their money which the gov. has an obligation to pay back.

davidk on September 1, 2009 at 7:51 PM

They were handouts nonetheless. That generation ignored the old adage about how the real destroyer of the liberties are those who distribute bounties, donations, and benefits. This may have been the generation that fought World War II but it was the same that voted away their freedoms when they elected and repeatedly re-elected a closet communist by the name of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

More than that, that generation was foolish enough to trust the government with their money. I hope this is a lesson we will learn again when it all comes crashing down (and it will…we can only hide the bad debt and maintain the exploding deficits for so long).

Now their grandchildren are weakened by years of a debt-fueled consumption mentality, a non-educating educational system run by politicians and union hacks, and a tax burden so high that single-income, intact families are a thing of the past. They’re dolts with a massive sense of entitlement. The uneducated, unarmed peasants people in our present government love.

The parallels to the Great Depression are truly frightening. FDR was the first to recognize that you don’t let a good crisis go to waste, and put us on the ruinous path to socialist tyranny. God help us if Obama, Pelosi, Reid and company are allowed to get their turn.

TheMightyMonarch on September 1, 2009 at 8:18 PM

I gotta feel sorry for the Chinese, they thought we were brilliant capitalists.

You’ll get back your FICA taxes all right–in a lump settlement, in a time when a wheelbarrow full of dollars will buy a loaf of bread.

Chris_Balsz on September 1, 2009 at 8:23 PM

Olympia snowe
this is off topic but it has to be posted here. She is going to cave and side with the libs on healthcare. Burn her phones at her offices. Pick a zip code or a town in Maine, call her office saying you represent a group of seniors and let her know she’s out if she votes with the libs. Better yet, take a page out of alinskys rules for radicals and say your moderate democrats against the bill. Stop her now before she caves! Call now!!

texaninfidel on September 1, 2009 at 8:25 PM

Personally i thought it was a pretty smart commercial. This really boxes in Obama and the Democrats and puts the GOP seniors side. Would’ve been nice to tack on attractive alternatives to Medicare. Health savings accounts.. Something.

cubbieblue25 on September 1, 2009 at 8:33 PM

ginaswo on September 1, 2009 at 7:45 PM

I don’t trust them. Tin foil hat firmly in place.

Cindy Munford on September 1, 2009 at 8:49 PM

This is the first good Republican ad in ages. Arguing in favor of things that no-one wants to publicly disagree with. Asking for bi-partisan effort right when the Dems are pushing to “go it alone”. Oh, and showing a BLACK MAN not just as a Republican, but a Republican of stature- which blunts any preemptive charge of racism. Two points for the loyal opposition!

Browncoatone on September 1, 2009 at 9:09 PM

Here is the problem with Steele’s statement – its a time bomb.

Remember when HW said “read my lips, no new taxes!”?

Same thing. Medicare is unsustainable. The biggest block of greedy, selfish, whining, undisciplined cry babies ever seen has started to hit Medicare. They are called baby boomers.

The big wave starts in 3 years with the huge group born in 47, then there 49ers, another huge group.

I’m all for driving back this current nightmare but lets not breed our own unicorns.

Lonetown on September 1, 2009 at 9:15 PM

Believe it or not there are things that can be done to save money in medicare without hurting people.

For instance, the Democrats hate the drug prescription plan that Bush signed. It does not have direct negotiations between the government and drug companies and people do pay into it, it is a discount program. This bill was part of a push for Health Savings Accounts and Medicare Advantage, both of which conservatives tend to like.

If the model for that program could be adapted to the rest of medicare, it might well save some money. The drug program has cost a lot less than anyone said it would and since it was established, the price of drugs has slowed its growth somewhat.

Terrye on September 1, 2009 at 9:36 PM

Lonetown:

I am a baby boomer. I started to work when I was 17 years old and since that time I have never asked anyone for anything.

I think the whole greedy selfish line is unfair. If I had to pick a generation that was greedy and selfish, it would be the children of the baby boomers.

The truth is a lot of young people out there have lifestyles today that they might not have if those baby boomers had to spend all their money taking care of their own parents rather than sending their kids to college and paying for their weddings and taking care of their kids and buying houses for them…..

Terrye on September 1, 2009 at 9:39 PM

Hey I’m a boomer too. I was talking about the other boomers!

Lonetown on September 1, 2009 at 9:49 PM

Agree, However, not all seniors have children who can help out. Many would surly be out on the street if SS were just stopped.
derft on September 1, 2009 at 8:16 PM

And that is why I am urging caution. A lot of seniors out there are scared to death. They don’t understand what’s going on. They are hearing that these programs are going broke and they don’t have anywhere else to turn.

These Gen-xers want to cut grandma off at the knees to fuel their own selfishness. Those of us who have been warning–since the 80s–about the demise of these unsustainable programs pointed out that the young people would begin to rebel against what is essentially government redistribution.

I don’t blame them. But let’s have some safety nets in place for those who have no backup.

And at the risk of opening another can of worms, I want to point a finger at the Christian church who gladly and greedily allowed the goverment to assume the role of charity.

I was a fool to believe them.

Naivete does not equal foolishness. Like I pointed out above, at that time people just trusted people.

I’d like to see the gov’ment back off on the amount of regulations it has imposed, but there are evil people out there who continually devise ways to steal from others.

davidk on September 1, 2009 at 10:00 PM

This is the only thing the “do nothing” generation of republicans can come up with?
Seems like another life when a younger Newt Gringrich seized upon a similar situation and offered the contract with America, and then after winning both houses of congress, passed a balanced budget and dared a powerful amd popular democrat president to veto it. Instead he takes credit for it these days, meanwhile look at what this bunch of republicans can do. Sad, so sad…….

paulsur on September 1, 2009 at 10:09 PM

Lonetown:

Oh…them

Okay then.

Truth is I knew when Bush tried to privatize just a little bitty part of social security and people went nuts that there was no stomach for cuts.

But sooner or later changes will be made. Hopefully there will be enough will to do it. And if they use the market to do it, then it does not have to ruin people.

Terrye on September 1, 2009 at 10:11 PM

Believe it or not there are things that can be done to save money in medicare without hurting people.

For instance, the Democrats hate the drug prescription plan that Bush signed. It does not have direct negotiations between the government and drug companies and people do pay into it, it is a discount program. This bill was part of a push for Health Savings Accounts and Medicare Advantage, both of which conservatives tend to like.

If the model for that program could be adapted to the rest of medicare, it might well save some money. The drug program has cost a lot less than anyone said it would and since it was established, the price of drugs has slowed its growth somewhat.

Terrye on September 1, 2009 at 9:36 PM

I want the gov. to get completely out of health care. My stance.

I agree that while we are dismantling these programs there are lots of things we can do “to save money in medicare without hurting people.”

Fraud control is the most obvious. Put fraudulent doctors and hospital admins in jail and jerk their credentials.

Defund the NEA and use that money to take care of seniors while we phase out medicare ans SS. The list is endless.

One of the things that really torqued my jaw about McCain was that he said as president he would veto any bill with earmarks (read pork) that came across his desk and then took time off his wimpy campaign to vote for a bill loaded with pork.

Conservatives need to grab some and start treating the people of the USoA with respect and dignity. The patronizing, condescending attitude coming from Washington is sickening.

davidk on September 1, 2009 at 10:13 PM

paulsur:

Newt knew this was coming, why not deal with it then? For the same reasons.

And when Bush tried to do some reform of social security, how much support did he get from the right or the public?

No, just blaming Republicans is the easy way out, the people are also part of the problem.

Terrye on September 1, 2009 at 10:14 PM

I see it diffeently. The GOP is saying we’ll keep our promises to our Seniors and won’t hang them out to dry. I agree with that stance, fully realizing that fixing the entitlement mess is going to be messy, tough, expensive, etc…. but we shouldn’t do it on the backs of the people that built this country.

Red State State of Mind on September 1, 2009 at 10:17 PM

davidk:

I work for a health care agency. I take care of people who have all sorts of problems, some of them chronic, many of them life threatening. A lot of these people started out on private care, and insurance…but after awhile many of them end up on some sort of government plan or other.

I know one young man who broke his neck in an accident when he was 23 years old. He is a quad. His medication alone costs more than $600 a month. Believe it or not, he would just as soon not be getting any kind of help at all, he would like to be healthy.

I think that we can make the programs better and more efficient, but I also think that there needs to be some sort of safety net for certain people.

Terrye on September 1, 2009 at 10:18 PM

Comment pages: 1 2