Tax hikes coming for Californians anyway
posted at 1:38 pm on August 27, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Californians must have thought they’d sent a loud and clear message to Sacramento in May when they rejected a series of referendums that would have approved tax hikes to solve their budget crisis. The only ballot initiative approved cut off legislators’ pay when they failed to produce a budget, in what should have been a sign that the Golden State electorate had had enough. The political class in the state capital apparently has their fingers stuck firmly in their ears:
While Californians are still feeling the sting of income and sales tax hikes signed into law earlier this year, now comes news that state tax authorities plan to take a little more from their pockets.
For only the second time in 30 years, the tax board is lowering the point where each tax bracket begins, bumping many people into a higher category. At the same time, officials are cutting back some deductions. Everyone will pay more, even people whose bracket or income doesn’t change.
The extra sums will total as much as $140 per family, on top of the increases previously enacted.
You’ll love the excuse:
Officials said the latest adjustments have been triggered by inflation, or rather the lack of it. This year, the state’s inflation index was a negative numberfor the first time since 1983. When the economy takes a deep plunge, so do tax brackets.
Er, what? If deflation occurs, then buying power of existing dollars goes up, at least in the short term. Strictly speaking, that should require less tax revenue as costs decline for the state. Instead, as people make less, they get taxed more.
How does this affect tax brackets?
Under the latest changes, for a married couple filing jointly, the top tax rate of 9.55% now begins at $92,698, down from $94,110. Combined with the earlier increases, such a couple with two children, earning $100,000, will see their California income tax bill rise by 22.3%, or $716, according to the state Franchise Tax Board. Their tax would go from $3,208 to $3,924, factoring in a $110 drop in the standard deduction for joint returns.
For singles, the top tax threshold has dropped from $47,055 to $46,349. This year, a single filer without children who earned $30,000 in 2008 and 2009 would pay 13.8% more: $617 instead of $542. The standard deduction for sole filers will fall by $55.
But for sheer cluelessness, you have to love this:
Not everyone minds paying more to protect such services as education, healthcare and parks, though.
An extra $100 or so, said Sharon Sugerman, a 59-year-old Sacramento resident who declined to give details about her job, “seems pretty reasonable to me.”
Do you wonder why Sugerman didn’t want to give her job details? It appears that Sugerman works for the California Department of Health, which took me all of ten seconds to discover on Google. She might have a personal interest in seeing tax hikes enacted, and it’s not about keeping parks open.
The rest of California employed outside of government disagrees, as they made clear in May. Maybe they should find representatives that will take their fingers out of their ears and actually listen to their constituents.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
the PRC just doesn’t get it.
homesickamerican on August 27, 2009 at 1:40 PM
This is only the beginning. There are going to be even more taxes on the way in CA. Congress is going to have to raise taxes as well. Get ready to BOHICA.
Weebork on August 27, 2009 at 1:41 PM
Shameless is Sacramento
ICBM on August 27, 2009 at 1:41 PM
Outside of an armed rebellion, i don’t precisely know how our legislature will ever figure it out.
And I love it especially because I’m 26, fresh out of law school, and trying to find a job. Whereas this state seems to be obsessed with driving every possible job out of the state. Help?
Defector01 on August 27, 2009 at 1:42 PM
Probably 75% of people in Sacramento will be in favor of the tax increases, because they’re government employees whose useless jobs are paid for with the revenue.
hawksruleva on August 27, 2009 at 1:43 PM
Everybody is hurting but public employees keep milking the system.
Blake on August 27, 2009 at 1:43 PM
That’s OK, I’m sure this will be the last one.
Because if we know anything about California politicians, it’s that they know what they’re doing.
Oh wait, aren’t they the people who have turned one of the greatest places to live into a banana republic, in a couple of decades.
There may possibly be more tax increases . . .
NoDonkey on August 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM
Maybe Arnold can auction off HIS burial plot in Arlington…..
Seems all you have to be to be buried there is a bloated member of the Kennedy clan…MILITARY SERVICE BE DAMMNED.
seejanemom on August 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM
Fingers in ears? Their whole heads are implanted in their nether regions!
Guardian on August 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM
The city of LA has laid off a whole 9 employees.
Blake on August 27, 2009 at 1:45 PM
Not all CA government employees are as clueless as Sugarman (I’ll bet she’s an upper manager). to working stiffs like me, that extra $100 in graft for the state means a heck of a lot – especially with unpaid furlough days coming!
This has got me so mad I could spit nails
irishspy on August 27, 2009 at 1:45 PM
This would be a better headline pic.
Guardian on August 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM
So, even WITHOUT a job, my taxes will go up. Congratulations Democrats. And now, word is out that the Democrats don’t want to give the public a voice in the new Indian Casino compacts either.
Geez, CA sucks.
originalpechanga on August 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM
Good job on becoming a “sanctuary state” morons. One day you’ll wise up and get a clue about paying the way for deadbeats.
TrickyDick on August 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM
Mz. Sugarman is probably doing a happy dance, behind closed doors. I’m sure this means a nice lil raise in pay, for her, and others within the government gang.
capejasmine on August 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM
Outside of an armed rebellion,
me thinks it will come to this before oboobi’s term has expired…..
SHARPTOOTH on August 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM
Did the author of the piece run into Ms Sugerman on the street and accepted her declining to give information about her state job, or did he/she contact Ms Sugerman at her state job and accepted her declining to give information about her state job?
Marcus on August 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM
And the exodus out of California will continue.
cat-scratch on August 27, 2009 at 1:48 PM
If I lived in Cali now, I’d be packing my stuff into a moving truck instead of typing this.
Every business owner and wage earner for that matter should be prepping to move out of that idiotic state. It’s the only way these complete dumbasses will ever get the message.
How many times does it need to be shown that to reduce revenue to the state all one has to do is RAISE taxes.
Stupid = liberal.
Spiritk9 on August 27, 2009 at 1:48 PM
Since when did the fascist cali govt listen to the Citizens.
They are all bums.
hawkman on August 27, 2009 at 1:49 PM
i hope this will be the last cool, hip, intelligent, knows how to talk african american president too.
ooohh….i am so racist!
Ghoul aid on August 27, 2009 at 1:49 PM
Yeah, my ass is sore and this is why.
Apologetic California on August 27, 2009 at 1:49 PM
Andy Stern of SEIU is smiling, so all is well with the solons of Sacto. They will be taken care of, and the hell with the rest of the citizenry.
And Guardian is right, their heads are wedged firmly. Give one of them a prostate exam, you have to be careful about not poking them in an eye.
Waxman has the same problem, but his nostrils are more at risk than those beady eyes.
Harry Schell on August 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM
Does anyone have any kind of a comparison of Dem-controlled states versus Republican-controlled states? I am curious as to whether historically right-leaning states are having as many struggles. I can guess the answer, but is there any data available?
search4truth on August 27, 2009 at 1:51 PM
By the way, the tax-happy harpy Sharon Sugerman quoted in the article?
She’s a California public employee working for the California Department of Public Health.
Apologetic California on August 27, 2009 at 1:51 PM
Nice work finding out she’s a parrot for the obama crowd.
tx2654 on August 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM
ObamaCare will cure that.
Free KY for all.
Might have to scimp on those cancer treatments, but what the hell, you can’t have everything.
NoDonkey on August 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM
Only a matter of time before we’re all Californians.
TXUS on August 27, 2009 at 1:54 PM
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Let California fail.
I’ll feel bad for all of the sensible people in the state that haven’t had the opportunity to leave yet, but
NOTHING would serve better as a canary in the socialist/facist coal mine.
It might help wake up a bunch of other blue states and the nation as a whole. Or not. Still, let it fail anyways. Short of the people subverting the state government the way they subverted the referendum results, it’s going to go down in flames, and then ARRA money will be used to bail it out because they just can’t let that canary die.
Dean_L_Can on August 27, 2009 at 1:54 PM
Great News!!! And the illegals continue to laugh at the people paying taxes
Tremmy on August 27, 2009 at 1:55 PM
What a state I live in. Where is Lex Luthor when you need him?
George Orwell on August 27, 2009 at 1:55 PM
We might as well give our state back to Mexico, for all it’s worth now.
The Ugly American on August 27, 2009 at 1:55 PM
It’s a very simple lesson for California and the rest of the country…you can’t expect different results with the same degenerate political class…you have to exorcise the lefty demons who got you into this mess before you can start to recover.
AUINSC on August 27, 2009 at 1:55 PM
The tax man can kiss my you know what. I can use my 403b to get out of a tax bracket.
Theworldisnotenough on August 27, 2009 at 1:56 PM
Yeah! So much for any of Obubmbles policies being for the benefit of all! A few choice people get above par care, at the expense of everyone else. I sure wonder what those that thought they’d be getting their mortgage, and car payments taken care of, and gas for their cars, are thinking right about now.
capejasmine on August 27, 2009 at 1:56 PM
Too many electoral votes and too big to fail.
States that managed their finances well will be forced to bail out the California jackasses, which means that once again, the jackasses will learn nothing.
NoDonkey on August 27, 2009 at 1:57 PM
Nothing’s going to change in Clownifornia until the entire districting scheme is eradicated and replaced with something that doesn’t practically guarantee life-long seats for scum like Pelosi. I hope Clownifornia fails… and I’m stuck here.
George Orwell on August 27, 2009 at 1:57 PM
They already have it, save for the formalities of surrender.
Fletch54 on August 27, 2009 at 1:58 PM
So wait a minute. The top tax rate kicks in at $46K? I thought the super high tax rates were only meant to hurt the “rich”. So am I to believe then that $46K = rich now according to Democrats?
angryed on August 27, 2009 at 1:59 PM
Typical.
lorien1973 on August 27, 2009 at 1:59 PM
and you know that they will keep electing the same type of politicians over and over and over again.
You would think they would finally figure out that sticking a fork into an electrical outlet is not wise but hey, who doesn’t like “free” stuff?
Doctor Zhivago on August 27, 2009 at 2:00 PM
Go east young man. Hang a right when you get to Oklahoma.
Guardian on August 27, 2009 at 2:00 PM
Too big to fail – the AIG of states. lol.
You’re right – there’s serious political fallout for failure. On the plus side, a bailout should get huge visibility and should still be used to point out the shortcomings of bad political decisions based on the misguided notion that government knows best.
Dean_L_Can on August 27, 2009 at 2:00 PM
What I’m going to love is the exodus of middle class families and the destruction of the tax base. If there is no one left to tax, they’ll have to tax poor people via more expensive fees and services.
If we do have small growth in GDP it won’t be in California. Businesses that might come here will settle in Nevada and Arizona. Even the Democrat base will tire of this.
Theworldisnotenough on August 27, 2009 at 2:01 PM
I certainly do mind paying more…How about you?
It would be great if we could get a part-time legislation back in Caalifornia.
1.That would cut Californias Budget 40-50%
BigMike252 on August 27, 2009 at 2:01 PM
May I recommend Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand.
A few “Days without Rich people” might be a worthwhile intermediate step.
Chainsaw56 on August 27, 2009 at 2:02 PM
Working….that’s a stretch of a word don’t you think? Loafing around for 8 hours a day complaining for 6 of those 8 is more appropriate.
angryed on August 27, 2009 at 2:03 PM
California politicans to the California electorate: “Fire in the hole!”
Dean_L_Can on August 27, 2009 at 2:04 PM
Or Max Zorin. He seemed to have it in specifically for San Francisco.
Doughboy on August 27, 2009 at 2:06 PM
Well, let’s hear it from California again. Shut down the legislature, shut down the governor, shut down the counties, shut down the cities, and shut down this misrepresentation.
Why do Californians subject themselves to this?
ted c on August 27, 2009 at 2:07 PM
Meanwhile, Arnie is asking for his piece of the high speed rail stimulus pie while our highways and bridges fall into ever-worsening disrepair.
Remember that 12 cent gas tax that was supposed to go towards highways infrastructure?
Yep, you guessed it….sucked right up to fund Sacto legislators’ pet budget line items.
It’s torches n’ pitchforks time.
The Ugly American on August 27, 2009 at 2:07 PM
Honestly, why do these people feel that We want them to educate or medicate us in anyway. Use all tax money to out the illegals and defend the country. Stop these BS give away programs. Stop 90% of the programs. No spending. And please no more programs to put people in debt.
Tremmy on August 27, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Every percent in tax increase is met with a three times reduction in state spending., five times reduction of state employees, and ten times reduction of elected officials salary and operating budget.
jukin on August 27, 2009 at 2:09 PM
They can’t, they’ve got votes to be buying
Doctor Zhivago on August 27, 2009 at 2:10 PM
Elections mean things.
lorien1973 on August 27, 2009 at 2:11 PM
Don’t worry, no one reads the LAT anymore except to mock it.
PattyJ on August 27, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Imbeciles, both the State and the Times.
TAR AND FEATHERS!
Bought in bulk.
EZnSF on August 27, 2009 at 2:13 PM
Maybe so, but I’m not holding my breath. Seems Sacramento’s saying “The only thing we have to fear is we ourselves.”
Blacksmith on August 27, 2009 at 2:13 PM
If someone WANTS to pay more, there is nothing stopping them cutting a check and sending it in. People are free to donate to the government at any time.
All these people who talk about not minding higher taxes should simply write a check and send it in … and stop trying to increase MY taxes. That pretty much exposes their bull crap as just that. It isn’t about them paying more taxes, it is really about me paying more taxes and I DO mind.
crosspatch on August 27, 2009 at 2:15 PM
They are going to be pushing hard to rewrite the Calif. Constitution to include this. DO NOT FALL FOR IT. It’s also going to include raising taxes by a majority vote instead of 2/3 vote, getting rid of Prop 13, gay marriage, and doing away with citizen propositions which I have mixed feelings about.
Blake on August 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM
What we need is a Cutting Chute at the border. The R’s get into Arizona and the D’s are cut out and sent to Oregon.
Ghostbuster on August 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM
Should we expect journalists to waste their time on Google?
They have more important things to do… they’re busy checking IDs at Klan meetings.
mankai on August 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM
“Er, what? If deflation occurs, then buying power of existing dollars goes up, at least in the short term. Strictly speaking, that should require less tax revenue as costs decline for the state.”…………….
Except costs never decline for the state, at least since Reagan was governor anyway.
They look at deflation as extra income–for you, not for them.
Noel on August 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM
..well, they may lower the brackets with the expectatrion of raisning taxes on us poorbastards, but that does NOT guarantee that the revenue stream will be increased.
And will someone please tell that stupd-a**ed Sacto-C*nt to go pound sand!
VoyskaPVO on August 27, 2009 at 2:17 PM
Capitalism: When my life improves, the lives of others improve as well.
Liberalism: in order for my life to improve, I must subtract from the lives of others.
beatcanvas on August 27, 2009 at 2:19 PM
Talk about your coincidences, right after reading this article, I received a company wide e-mail announcing that our San Jose facility is being closed, most of the functions will be transfered to other facilities around the country.
This means a loss of 600 jobs for California.
MarkTheGreat on August 27, 2009 at 2:20 PM
Shhhhhhhhhhhhh! Chainsaw, you can’t go telling everybody about the plan, because the looters will just follow us! I’ve hesitated from telling people to move out of Cali because when no one is left to loot, the looters will move inland.
j_galt on August 27, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Every day I am thankful I left California and moved back home to Texas…
mimi1220 on August 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM
I have, on a number of occasions, asked liberal acquaintances the following quesiton: “What is your definition of slavery?”
Most of the time, they can not provide a very good answer. I then give them my definition: “Slavery occurs when someone takes all the fruit of your labor and then decides what to give back to you.” Most of the time, that definition makes sense to them.
They quickly change the subject when I then ask them: “At what tax percentage would you consider our government slave owners?”
ClanDerson on August 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM
This talk of tax hikes gets me wee-weed out.
rjoco1 on August 27, 2009 at 2:23 PM
Maybe Arnold can auction off HIS burial plot in Arlington…..
Seems all you have to be to be buried there is a bloated member of the Kennedy clan…MILITARY SERVICE BE DAMMNED.
seejanemom on August 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM
As much as this pains me to say this, Teddy did a 2 year hitch in the Army as an MP in Paris during the Korean War… He qualifies for Arlington in that manner… His tenure in the Senate didn’t hurt, either…
I’ll make it a point NOT to walk by his marker the next time I visit John and Bobby… Those 95 feet seems like an eternity to me… Not worth the walk, EVAH!!
Khun Joe on August 27, 2009 at 2:25 PM
It’s Michael Jackson Fiscal Policy: whittling at your nose to spite your face.
RushBaby on August 27, 2009 at 2:28 PM
Normally, I could care less about what happens to Californians (they deserve what they get for supporting Libs/Statists/RHINO they way they do) but this means more of them coming to Colorado. Last thing I need to see is California plates on a Prius in ski traffic in a blizzard on I70.
Jussi on August 27, 2009 at 2:28 PM
When you keep getting re-elected by people who don’t pay taxes,you don’t have to worry about the one’s that do.
BruceB on August 27, 2009 at 2:28 PM
come to Arizona Californicans, we have an ample supply of housing *cough* and 3 measures on our ballot in 2010 that should be good for business on the anti card check, health care freedom, and affirm action ban….
we are also trying to get some tax cuts through our budget process..
ginaswo on August 27, 2009 at 2:28 PM
He qualifies for Arlington because he was an MP across the world during wartime?
I somehow doubt my dad would qualify for a plot even though he was in ‘Nam while that war was going on, even though he was just guarding a huge ammo dump rather than on active patrol.
teke184 on August 27, 2009 at 2:29 PM
Jussi
the dumb ones will stay in Cali til its totally driven into the ground by their policies, we should get a inflow of business first, hopefully!
ginaswo on August 27, 2009 at 2:29 PM
Curiously,
-
As tax rates go up, tax revenue will continue to fall.
-
Then what will they do?
-
See 1987-1988, 1991-1992, 1999-2000, 2008-2009
-
It happens every time.
esblowfeld on August 27, 2009 at 2:30 PM
Why? Whenever anyone (especially a conservative) speaks up regarding the issues they are labeled as “terrorists” or “mobs” or “fascist” etc by their elected reps!
Besides, they’re the gubment and the gubment ALWAYS knows what’s best for the
peasantspeople!Liberty or Death on August 27, 2009 at 2:30 PM
I can see Arnold now starring as quarterback John E Unite US…. A hush falls over the crowd as the quarterback stakes the snap.. 15% 20% 25% Hike Hike Hike – Snap.
This is definately the way to go. I hope they double it for the Hollywood and Berkely crowd. No more need for IOUs.
It is a shame to see an entire state pay for the stupidity of a few enviormentalist wackos.
kanda on August 27, 2009 at 2:30 PM
Love it!
j_galt on August 27, 2009 at 2:31 PM
You might want the invitation delayed until after the referendum passes. Make sure the liberal legislative dreams are locked out, just like our federal constitution *cough*, before they come.
WashJeff on August 27, 2009 at 2:31 PM
Ah, but you see, its not about the costs the state pays (which won’t go down with deflation because the unions have the fix in), but what one can buy with one’s money. If your costs go down, that just means you can afford to pay more taxes. What part of “progressive tax system” don’t you understand?
…
Yet another reason to have a flat tax.
Count to 10 on August 27, 2009 at 2:32 PM
I can only hope that the 2010 elections will be a bloodbath for anyone with a “D” and “incumbent” next to their name.
Pissed off in the PRK.
GarandFan on August 27, 2009 at 2:32 PM
So when we have inflation, taxes must to up because everything costs more for the state and when we have deflation, taxes must go up because the states revenue hasn’t kept pace.
Fred 2 on August 27, 2009 at 2:35 PM
Sacramento is bigger than that, but I know what you’re getting at.
Count to 10 on August 27, 2009 at 2:36 PM
Sacramento COUNTY is a swinger county and pretty conservative fiscally; it is the home of Tom McClintock and Dan Lungren after all. The city is a hell hole; Bakersfield with a dome.
Apologetic California on August 27, 2009 at 2:54 PM
I currently reside in California and I have my whole life. Born and raised here, I have watched California quickly turn from red to blue, and with that, quickly disintegrate.
The ultra-liberal tax and spend politicians, or so-called ‘progressives’ as they prefer to be called, from one to the next in seemingly rapid progression, along with the ones who have remained in office for decades, have run this state into the ground at a solid pace over the last 30 years.
I can hardly wait to see California fade away in my rear view mirror once I have finished my career.
SilverStar830 on August 27, 2009 at 3:01 PM
What? The LA Times misleading their readers by not disclosing Sugerman’s position and job title?
I’m Shocked, Shocked, it tell you!
SalHansen on August 27, 2009 at 3:07 PM
Oh really?
Check this out…
Once folks start to realize that a motel stay is cheaper than a state park, this little rate hike scheme of theirs will ultimately fail as miserably as all the rest.
The Ugly American on August 27, 2009 at 3:15 PM
I work in Sacramento, so no bombs please!
pseudonominus on August 27, 2009 at 3:17 PM
Does ANN have the day off today??
BigWyo on August 27, 2009 at 3:23 PM
I’m a Californian, born and raised. Stuck here though, since I own my home (condo) and units in my neighborhood aren’t selling. If I could get this albatross from around my neck, I’d be packed up and outta here. Don’t know where I’d go, but I’d make good time.
As for the dirty pool that Sack-a-tomatoes is playing, I’m not so sure that it’s the case of our “representatives” not listening to the voters as much as it is retaliation for what the voters said. The voters said “NO!” the pols are saying, “Oh yeah? Well, we’ll show you!”.
Left Coast Right Mind on August 27, 2009 at 3:29 PM
We are making plans to leave, but the poorer you are, the more difficult that is. I never should have moved here (from PA “bitter clinger” country), but my spouse’s family is here.
However, we want to start our own family, and it’s becoming increasingly clear this is the last place to have a family, run a business, or do anything except a) suck from the public teat or b) make movies and sneer at the unwashed.
evergreen on August 27, 2009 at 3:30 PM
So am I to understand that once liberals have effectively ruined California by creating a welfare state and by welcoming illegal aliens, most of them will relocate to nearby states to introduce the same type of thinking that will ruin those states too?
I guess that’s one way to ruin a country.
BuckeyeSam on August 27, 2009 at 3:31 PM
If I can avoid buying products from Cali, I will.
Why?
Why should I pay for products from California, when my payment will go to pay workers for their labor, which will be taxed out of their pocketbooks?
Yeah. That’s my logic.
madmonkphotog on August 27, 2009 at 3:43 PM
Just about time to go John Galt in California.
tballard on August 27, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »