Marine who went nuclear on Democrat: “The swastika is on their own arm”

posted at 7:16 pm on August 25, 2009 by Allahpundit

Via Greg Hengler, a palate cleanser starring conservatives’ newest grassroots hero. Disabled vet, passionate about small government, renowned for delivering juicy cuts of rhetorical red meat: Why not run him against Brian “Brownshirts” Baird next year? Sure, the Nazi comparison is offensive, but Baird and company started it. Let them spend the campaign defending it.

Since he mentioned Pelosi, this seems like a fine opportunity for our Nan-bashing quote of the day. Which stalwart Republican said this: “I would not vote for her. Someone that divisive and that polarizing cannot bring us together.” Answer here.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

He didn’t look physically disabled when he walked away after his little huffy rant.

Probably has PTSD.

These are the people we need to look out for. Vets with a chip on their shoulder and pipebomb making supplies in their closet. I’m surprised those loud clapping noises didn’t make him duck for cover, pull out a bowie knife, and start gutting the nearest angry middle-aged white protester.

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Alright….it is TIME TO FLUSH THIS TURD….I can’t email allah, something about a restraining order, but PLEASE, let’s pull the plug.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:33 PM

Wow, that guy is a real dope. Thankfully, he wasn’t paid to think.

simplesimon on August 25, 2009 at 8:25 PM

He was defending our country as your mommy was still wiping your arse, simpleton.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:34 PM

“He didn’t look physically disabled when he walked away after his little huffy rant.”

Time for mommy to flush the toilet in the basement and wash this scum into the sewer.

notagool on August 25, 2009 at 8:38 PM

Wait a minute! This guy must be a plant! Didn’t Jon Cary patiently explain to us that people go into the military cause they r dum?

I’d like to see this guy go toe to toe w/Kerry over those comments. Mucho fun.

di butler on August 25, 2009 at 8:38 PM

2010: The year we pull the plug on congress.

JellyToast on August 25, 2009 at 7:51 PM

“2010: The year we make contact.”

Updated for election:

“2010: The year we pull the plug.”

Awesome!!!!

Sapwolf on August 25, 2009 at 8:38 PM

simplesimon on August 25, 2009 at 8:25 PM
He was defending our country as your mommy was still wiping your arse, simpleton.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:34 PM

Hey Simpleton, go tell mommy she missed a spot..you stink.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:40 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:33 PM

Do you need help with these trolls?
:P

FontanaConservative on August 25, 2009 at 8:43 PM

He didn’t look physically disabled when he walked away after his little huffy rant.

We can see that yours is entirely psychological. There’s no chip on his shoulder, like you seem to have. You might just want to thank someone like him for serving because you have the right to spew such crap, or did you think that your freedom was free? I won’t hold my breath.

I think it is time for you to take those meds and put the keyboard down. The orderly is calling you…

Patriot Vet on August 25, 2009 at 8:45 PM

These are the people we need to look out for. Vets with a chip on their shoulder and pipebomb making supplies in their closet. I’m surprised those loud clapping noises didn’t make him duck for cover, pull out a bowie knife, and start gutting the nearest angry middle-aged white protester.

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM

See, this is what you get when you don’t take your medication…know take the medication, lie down, everything will be all right…you don’t know where I live do you?

right2bright on August 25, 2009 at 8:46 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:33 PM
Do you need help with these trolls?
:P

FontanaConservative on August 25, 2009 at 8:43 PM

Hey FonCon….nah, lightweights, the both of them…but get while the getting is good.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:47 PM

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM

I have a chip on my shoulder against Marxists in Democrat clothing to enslave me to an out of control federal government and this was my specialty when I was in the Navy.

Quick! Call DHS!

DerKrieger on August 25, 2009 at 8:47 PM

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM
See, this is what you get when you don’t take your medication…know take the medication, lie down, everything will be all right…you don’t know where I live do you?

right2bright on August 25, 2009 at 8:46 PM

Nah, this is what happens when your mom and dad are also brother and sister.
Pathetic little nothing, this one. AP needs to put the slam down.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:47 PM

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM

I have a chip on my shoulder against Marxists in Democrat clothing to enslave me to an out of control federal government and this was my specialty when I was in the Navy.

Quick! Call DHS!

DerKrieger on August 25, 2009 at 8:48 PM

He didn’t look physically disabled when he walked away after his little huffy rant.

Probably has PTSD.

These are the people we need to look out for. Vets with a chip on their shoulder and pipebomb making supplies in their closet. I’m surprised those loud clapping noises didn’t make him duck for cover, pull out a bowie knife, and start gutting the nearest angry middle-aged white protester.

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM

wecome_ghosts:

Unwelcome Spook,its obvious,your a disciple of Murtha’s
“In Cold Blood”,as well as Kerry’s”Cutting of ears and heads”!

canopfor on August 25, 2009 at 8:48 PM

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM
I have a chip on my shoulder against Marxists in Democrat clothing to enslave me to an out of control federal government and this was my specialty when I was in the Navy.

Quick! Call DHS!

DerKrieger on August 25, 2009 at 8:48 PM

I liked the lines better. Very nice.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:49 PM

You guys sure didn’t mind going after a women who’d lost her son in the Iraq war. It’s odd that you’re not up in arms about people with “absolute moral authority” speaking out on public policy now.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 8:11 PM

You’ve lied again.
No one “went after” Cindy Sheehan.
You just lie.
Your party is the one that provably seeks to defame and destroy those who disagree with it.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 8:49 PM

He didn’t look physically disabled when he walked away after his little huffy rant.

Probably has PTSD.

These are the people we need to look out for. Vets with a chip on their shoulder and pipebomb making supplies in their closet. I’m surprised those loud clapping noises didn’t make him duck for cover, pull out a bowie knife, and start gutting the nearest angry middle-aged white protester.

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Village: We found your idiot.

GrannyDee on August 25, 2009 at 8:50 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:47 PM

This bile spewing cretin has had it coming since he got here in the last open registration. And the simpleton would not be missed either.

kingsjester on August 25, 2009 at 8:50 PM

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Ban-worthy.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 8:50 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:47 PM

This bile spewing cretin has had it coming since he got here in the last open registration. And the simpleton would not be missed either.

kingsjester on August 25, 2009 at 8:50 PM

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM
Ban-worthy.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 8:50 PM

Email AP or ED, I can’t….for some reason, seriously….this sewage needs to be flushed…he made a Trig crack and everyone emailed AP, with no avail…I think he might have dirt on AP and his cats…..I don’t know for sure.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:53 PM

You guys sure didn’t mind going after a women who’d lost her son in the Iraq war. It’s odd that you’re not up in arms about people with “absolute moral authority” speaking out on public policy now.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 8:11 PM

Did you get your kneepads, crr6?

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:54 PM

I hope this guy runs for congress, He is smarter than most congressmen (Dumocrats/Liberals/Progressives/Socialist/Liars/Insane idiots) He is agreat American. Thank you sir…

vulcannomad on August 25, 2009 at 8:55 PM

German Worker’s Party = Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei
NSDAP
Nazi

At one time the Democratic Party of the US used to look out for the ‘little guy’, now they just want to take his money, run his life, decide how much medical treatment he deserves. Such nice people are the Democratic Party members looking out to make sure our liberty gets removed for the ‘security’ of health care… that turns out to be fleeting due to the problems of government doing such.

Thus they forget Franklin on liberty and security.

Soon they will forget him on the Republic.

Then things get nasty, very quickly.

ajacksonian on August 25, 2009 at 8:55 PM

“he Nazi comparison is offensive…”

Why?

rrpjr on August 25, 2009 at 8:56 PM

Sure, the Nazi comparison is offensive

On behalf of which group are you offended? The Nazis or the Dems?

Ronnie on August 25, 2009 at 8:56 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:53 PM

That night he made the Trig crack, he also made one about me and my daughter. Needless to say, he’s not on my faves list.

kingsjester on August 25, 2009 at 8:57 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:53 PM

That night he made the Trig crack, he also made one about me and my daughter. Needless to say, he’s not on my faves list.

kingsjester on August 25, 2009 at 8:57 PM

He has something on the Allah’s cats…I’m telling you…

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:00 PM

You’ve lied again.
No one “went after” Cindy Sheehan.
You just lie.
Your party is the one that provably seeks to defame and destroy those who disagree with it.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 8:49 PM

SAN FRANCISCO, Oct 30, 2008 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ — Just 5 days before the election, at 3a.m. on October 30th, all of the front windows of the Cindy Sheehan for Congress campaign offices were shattered. Although staffers had been in the office less than an hour earlier, no one was in the building at the time of the incident. No one was hurt and there were no witnesses. Cindy Sheehan is a candidate for Congress in California’s 8th Congressional District race against incumbent Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).
“It seems to have been a calculated intimidation tactic,” said Tiffany Burns, the Cindy for Congress campaign manager. “One of our computers was stolen, but no other property was taken from our offices and no surrounding buildings were targeted. Clearly they wanted to both frighten us and to gather information.” Total damage to the campaign office is currently estimated at more than $5,000.

Does that count as “going after her”? I eagerly await your response.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:01 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:53 PM

Email sent.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:02 PM

Wow, that guy is a real dope. Thankfully, he wasn’t paid to think.

simplesimon on August 25, 2009 at 8:25 PM

simplesimon: Been there,done that!

“Halp us Jon Carry-We R stuk Hear in Irak”!

canopfor on August 25, 2009 at 9:02 PM

Does that count as “going after her”? I eagerly await your response.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:01 PM

Pelosi did that. Prove otherwise.

Ronnie on August 25, 2009 at 9:03 PM

Does that count as “going after her”? I eagerly await your response.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:01 PM

Nancy and her brownshirts…

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:03 PM

Does that count as “going after her”? I eagerly await your response.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:01 PM

However, knowing what an attentin whore Sheehan is, I find it hard to believe that it wasn’t Sheehan and her pinkos who did the damage. You lose.

Blake on August 25, 2009 at 9:04 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:00 PM

Some late afternoon mid-morning to the cat nip no doubt

FontanaConservative on August 25, 2009 at 9:06 PM

German Worker’s Party = Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei
NSDAP
Nazi

ajacksonian on August 25, 2009 at 8:55 PM

ajacksonian:
———————————————————-
Liberal Democrat Party=Civilian National Secruity Forces!
-just try’n to help!:)

canopfor on August 25, 2009 at 9:06 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:00 PM

Some late afternoon mid-morning trips to the cat nip no doubt

FontanaConservative on August 25, 2009 at 9:06 PM

FontanaConservative on August 25, 2009 at 9:06 PM

Does that count as “going after her”? I eagerly await your response.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:01 PM

You bring me an isolated act of vandalism, as if it compared in scope to how your side has treated any number of people from the conservative side.

Why do you look at the speck in my eye, and ignore the plank in your own?

No, it does not count as “going after her;” unless you can show that it was done by a conservative, specifically to intimidate.

It could have been a code-pinker, or one of the unhinged “international anwer” types. Or, a rabid environut. Or a Larouchetard.

Your example doesn’t prove anything.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:06 PM

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:01 PM

Was anyone charged?

Why would any Republican right before the election – Oct 30, 2008 – go after Ms Sheehan? It would most likely backfire and cause more people to turn out for BO?

So I am guessing that someone who really wanted the anti war contigent to turn out at the polls did it.

Or do you have more information that your going to blindside us with after someone challenges you?

journeyintothewhirlwind on August 25, 2009 at 9:07 PM

The only disabled stuff Libtards accept are alphabet conditions dreamed up by fellow Libtard psychologists excusing laziness and bad behavior in schools, and those who exercised their God-universal consciousness-given right to screw themselves up with drugs, alcohol and “free luuuuuv”.

Dr. ZhivBlago on August 25, 2009 at 9:08 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:00 PM

Some late afternoon mid-morning trips to the cat nip no doubt

FontanaConservative on August 25, 2009 at 9:06 PM
FontanaConservative on August 25, 2009 at 9:06 PM

I’m currently trying to ween my cat off of her cat nip before grooming her for her WH gig….she also still licks her butt, but with obama doing that too, she feels that it should not be much of a problem…..

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:09 PM

Does that count as “going after her”? I eagerly await your response.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:01 PM

The logical person to have been going after Sheehan in that senario, would in all probability be Pelosi. Logic escapes liberals.

tessa on August 25, 2009 at 9:10 PM

You guys sure didn’t mind going after a women who’d lost her son in the Iraq war. It’s odd that you’re not up in arms about people with “absolute moral authority” speaking out on public policy now.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 8:11 PM

Well, moron, the difference is that Saint Cindy’s son was not dragooned into the military. He joined up. He re-enlisted. His moon bat mother, along with the sorry Pricks we have for media, used his honorable sacrifice to try and further her moon bat agenda. Moral Authority by Proxy is hor$eshit.

BigWyo on August 25, 2009 at 9:10 PM

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM
I have a chip on my shoulder against Marxists in Democrat clothing to enslave me to an out of control federal government and this was my specialty when I was in the Navy.

Quick! Call DHS!
DerKrieger on August 25, 2009 at 8:47 PM

NAVY EXPLOSIVE ORDINANCE DISPOSAL–Holy freaking shite! “Ghost”–good thing you don’t have to meet him face to face!

lovingmyUSA on August 25, 2009 at 9:10 PM

Does that count as “going after her”? I eagerly await your response.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:01 PM
Nancy and her brownshirts…

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:03 PM

HornetSting:Nancy and her brownshirts…

riding Palomino’s bare back,no doubt!hehe:)

canopfor on August 25, 2009 at 9:11 PM

Your example doesn’t prove anything.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:06 PM

Well of course not dear. Because then you’d have to admit you’re wrong, which is something that doesn’t happen very often, if at all on the internet. But I’ve came about as close as is possible. You look ridiculous and that’s enough for me tonight.

Let’s just remember, you said “no one” went after her. Someone did. And the odds are much much higher that it was some loony on your side then someone who agrees with her politically. Of course you know this. I understand the need to keep dodging against the odds though. If it’s any consolation, I pity you.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:12 PM

The were talking at A of S that Bernie Goldberg exposed Mary Mapes today for knowing that Bush volunteered to fly in Vietnam and Mapes suppressed it.

tessa on August 25, 2009 at 9:12 PM

Nazi comparison is offensive

The truth hurts, but is never offensive.

Fighton03 on August 25, 2009 at 9:12 PM

Sure, the Nazi comparison is offensive

Of course it is. Nazism is an offensive thing. And if the shoe fits…

atheling on August 25, 2009 at 9:13 PM

Let’s just remember, you said “no one” went after her. Someone did. And the odds are much much higher that it was some loony on your side then someone who agrees with her politically. Of course you know this. I understand the need to keep dodging against the odds though. If it’s any consolation, I pity you.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:12 PM

Heck, if they’d left a noose on the door then you could be sure about it huh?

Once again….you assert an opinion and call if fact.

FAIL.

Fighton03 on August 25, 2009 at 9:14 PM

You guys sure didn’t mind going after a women who’d lost her son in the Iraq war. It’s odd that you’re not up in arms about people with “absolute moral authority” speaking out on public policy now. –crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 8:11 PM

The problem with Sheehan is that she was lying, and that she increased her disingenuous rantings as she realized that it made her popular with the press.

For what its worth, I still don’t buy into the idea of “absolute moral authority”. I think what welcome_ghosts said is offensive and pretty much made him/her sound like a complete moron, but I think the “BUUUURRRRN HIM!” type stuff is a little over the top. And I think this David Hendrick fellow seems perfectly capable of defending himself… it isn’t like welcome_ghosts (and others who will undoubtedly follow) insulted a 6 year old girl and stole her cookies.

DaveS on August 25, 2009 at 9:16 PM

Your example doesn’t prove anything.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:06 PM

Well of course not dear. Because then you’d have to admit you’re wrong, which is something that doesn’t happen very often, if at all on the internet. But I’ve came about as close as is possible. You look ridiculous and that’s enough for me tonight.

Let’s just remember, you said “no one” went after her. Someone did. And the odds are much much higher that it was some loony on your side then someone who agrees with her politically. Of course you know this. I understand the need to keep dodging against the odds though. If it’s any consolation, I pity you.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:12 PM

Cute, troll; having no facts, you tried to make some up. When I (and others) call you on this, with reason and logic, you fall back on snark, with bad grammer thrown in.

And, for good measure, you think I look ridiculous.

Heh.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:17 PM

Once again….you assert an opinion and call if fact.

FAIL.

Fighton03 on August 25, 2009 at 9:14 PM

I didn’t call it a fact. Everyone else here seems to believe it’s a fact that Pelosi did it.

Nancy and her brownshirts…

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:03 PM

Pelosi did that. Prove otherwise.

Ronnie on August 25, 2009 at 9:03 PM

Is that a FAIL?

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:17 PM

Is that a FAIL?

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:17 PM

Nope…and you know FAILURE, crr6.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:18 PM

I think what everything welcome_ghosts said is offensive and pretty much made him/her sound like a complete moron,

DaveS on August 25, 2009 at 9:16 PM

FIFY

Fighton03 on August 25, 2009 at 9:18 PM

@crr6: How did you come to the conclusion that the article you linked had anything at all to do with… whatever you are implying it has to do with?

DaveS on August 25, 2009 at 9:18 PM

The problem with Sheehan is that she was lying, and that she increased her disingenuous rantings as she realized that it made her popular with the press.

You mean like appearing on Hannity and spouting more “Nazi” rhetoric?

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:19 PM

DaveS on August 25, 2009 at 9:16 PM

You are not exactly the one to go to for all things intelligent, DaveS.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:19 PM

And the odds are much much higher that it was some loony on your side then someone who agrees with her politically.

Asserted as fact….

Like I said. Fail.

Fighton03 on August 25, 2009 at 9:20 PM

You mean like appearing on Hannity and spouting more “Nazi” rhetoric?

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:19 PM

NO, that would be your mom, Nancy.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:20 PM

Is that a FAIL?

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:17 PM

It’s a FACT. No one else had a motive. The right was very pleased that Sheehan was running against Pelosi.

Ronnie on August 25, 2009 at 9:20 PM

Let’s just remember, you said “no one” went after her. Someone did. And the odds are much much higher that it was some loony on your side then someone who agrees with her politically.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:12 PM

Are you kidding? The “odds are much better” that it was a righty in a voting district with a Partisan Voting Index of +35 Democrat? Are you on crack?

DaveS on August 25, 2009 at 9:21 PM

If it’s any consolation, I pity you.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:12 PM

I take my consolation from the fact that many of the better posters here have my back.

I’m all set, even without your misplaced pity.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:21 PM

Does that count as “going after her”? I eagerly await your response.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:01 PM
Nancy and her brownshirts…

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:03 PM

HornetSting:Nancy and her brownshirts…

riding Palomino’s bare back,no doubt!hehe:)

canopfor on August 25, 2009 at 9:11 PM

Was she screaming ‘wildfire’, Canopfor…hee hee.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:22 PM

You are not exactly the one to go to for all things intelligent, DaveS.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:19 PM

You’re just annoyed that I call you out on some of the silly arguments you make.

DaveS on August 25, 2009 at 9:23 PM

@crr6: How did you come to the conclusion that the article you linked had anything at all to do with… whatever you are implying it has to do with?

DaveS on August 25, 2009 at 9:18 PM

Honestly when I said “going after” I was referring to the conservative punditry railing against her. At the time the right claimed she was set up as an absolute authority figure to protect her from criticism, and this rationale led them to skewer her merrily. Something tells me if the left started acting similarly with this guy massrighty would crap his pants.

The campaign HQ attack was just something I had remembered from a few years ago, and I thought it was an even more extreme example of someone “going after” Sheehan. But it wasn’t really what I had in mind when I made the original point.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:23 PM

You are not exactly the one to go to for all things intelligent, DaveS.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:19 PM
You’re just annoyed that I call you out on some of the silly arguments you make.

DaveS on August 25, 2009 at 9:23 PM

You’re like a gnat, Dave.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:23 PM

I take my consolation from the fact that many of the better posters here have my back.
massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:21 PM

LOL. Well they probably would, considering you’re on a conservative blog now wouldn’t they?

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:24 PM

DaveS on August 25, 2009 at 9:23 PM
You’re like a gnat, Dave.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:23 PM

You annoy me because I loathe stupidity.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:25 PM

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:24 PM

Then why are you here? Are you lost or simply a masochist?

kingsjester on August 25, 2009 at 9:26 PM

I take my consolation from the fact that many of the better posters here have my back.

I’m all set, even without your misplaced pity.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:21 PM

Saying the “odds are much higher” doesn’t assert it as a fact moron. It simply says it’s more likely. You know this of course, but like massrighty you have to defend your idiocy to the bitter end.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:26 PM

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:21 PM
LOL. Well they probably would, considering you’re on a conservative blog now wouldn’t they?

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:24 PM

…That, and the fact that you are a douchebag…run along and play under obama’s desk, little liberal.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:26 PM

Saying the “odds are much higher” doesn’t assert it as a fact moron. It simply says it’s more likely. You know this of course, but like massrighty you have to defend your idiocy to the bitter end.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:26 PM

Produce the odds then.

Assertion…FAIL.

Fighton03 on August 25, 2009 at 9:26 PM

This is amusing. The Trig Troofers are complaining that people rejected Cindy Sheehan’s Absolute Moral Authority(TM)?

What is the argument, that the right should have been going after Cindy’s children instead of her arguments?

18-1 on August 25, 2009 at 9:27 PM

Something tells me if the left started acting similarly with this guy massrighty would crap his pants.

The campaign HQ attack was just something I had remembered from a few years ago, and I thought it was an even more extreme example of someone “going after” Sheehan. But it wasn’t really what I had in mind when I made the original point.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:23 PM

So, this follows logically (from another of your posts:)

then you’d have to admit you’re wrong, which is something that doesn’t happen very often, if at all on the internet.

So, this, then, is your admission that you were wrong.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:27 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:26 PM

Thanks, Sting.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:29 PM

Folks, I have to go now; duty calls.

Goodnight.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:30 PM

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:30 PM

Night

Fighton03 on August 25, 2009 at 9:31 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:26 PM
Thanks, Sting.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:29 PM

Folks, I have to go now; duty calls.

Goodnight.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 9:30 PM

Welcome and good night.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:31 PM

Honestly when I said “going after” I was referring to the conservative punditry railing against her. At the time the right claimed she was set up as an absolute authority figure to protect her from criticism, and this rationale led them to skewer her merrily. Something tells me if the left started acting similarly with this guy massrighty would crap his pants.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:23 PM

She was set up as an absolute authority figure… because as such she was a potent, emotional weapon to harm the president. The problem with the concocted “absolute moral authority”–beyond the fact that such a concept is ridiculous in the context of a mother who has no expertise on conducting wars and should therefore have no authority at all–was that it was used to prevent people from pointing out simple facts, such as the fact that she was lying about not getting a meeting with the President.

If you are aware of some lie being perpetrated by this retired Marine which he is only allowed to perpetrate due to his “absolute moral authority” then maybe you have a point… IF you can find anyone who actually claimed that he had such authority. I certainly haven’t seen it.

You’re like a gnat, Dave.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:23 PM

Thanks, man.

DaveS on August 25, 2009 at 9:31 PM

Does that count as “going after her”? I eagerly await your response.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:01 PM

Apparently Cindy Sheehan’s own staff figured they knew who it was.

Typital liberal research. You people are pathetic.

Here is an excerpt from an interview with Shehan campaign staffers:

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=prnw.20081030.LATH152&show_article=1

Campaign staffers also note each incident, including today’s early morning incident, has followed closely on the heels of a confrontation with Cindy Sheehan’s opponent Nancy Pelosi. This morning’s incident occurred after an on-air confrontation between the two candidates on KQED’s public affairs program Forum with Michael Krasny on Wednesday morning.

“Each time we confront her, each time we ask her for a debate, each time we gain ground in the polls, something horrible happens,” said Burns. “Once or twice might be a coincidence, but such a consistent correlation is hard to ignore.”

Yoop on August 25, 2009 at 9:31 PM

You’re like a gnat, Dave.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:23 PM
Thanks, man.

DaveS on August 25, 2009 at 9:31 PM

No problem…seriously, I usually disagree with you, but you seem to back your arguments so….I won’t swat you.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:33 PM

Saying the “odds are much higher” doesn’t assert it as a fact moron.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:26 PM

This does.

You guys sure didn’t mind going after a women who’d lost her son in the Iraq war.

Ronnie on August 25, 2009 at 9:34 PM

Leftists attack Cindy Sheehan in order to make it look like conservatives did just to try to influence a point of view? Nah, would never happen…

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/25/fake-hate-crime-alert-leftists-vandalize-denver-democrat-hq-dems-smeared-obamacare-foes/

IamKurtacus on August 25, 2009 at 9:34 PM

Does that count as “going after her”? I eagerly await your response.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:01 PM

Well, Cindy Sheehan is so 2004. She’s history, she’s done. Let’s talk about your mother, Nancy.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:34 PM

“Each time we confront her, each time we ask her for a debate, each time we gain ground in the polls, something horrible happens,” said Burns. “Once or twice might be a coincidence, but such a consistent correlation is hard to ignore.”

Yoop on August 25, 2009 at 9:31 PM

Once is bad luck, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action

Fighton03 on August 25, 2009 at 9:34 PM

Separate the wheat from the chaff.

If you want blood, you got it!

CEA_Agent on August 25, 2009 at 9:34 PM

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:47 PM

This bile spewing cretin has had it coming since he got here in the last open registration. And the simpleton would not be missed either.

kingsjester on August 25, 2009 at 8:50 PM

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM
Ban-worthy.

massrighty on August 25, 2009 at 8:50 PM
Email AP or ED, I can’t….for some reason, seriously….this sewage needs to be flushed…he made a Trig crack and everyone emailed AP, with no avail…I think he might have dirt on AP and his cats…..I don’t know for sure.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 8:53 PM

this troll better be gone by now. last week a nasty anti-Mormon remark was made, of course nothing was done then, either.

I_C on August 25, 2009 at 9:36 PM

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:24 PM

Then why are you here? Are you lost or simply a masochist?

kingsjester on August 25, 2009 at 9:26 PM

Naw…this here’s either an Ed/Allah construct to keep things lively or a dyed in the wool, sniveling, angry, ‘I’m smarter than you’ Liberal Fu#*Tard…

In this case, I believe the latter……

BigWyo on August 25, 2009 at 9:37 PM

this troll better be gone by now. last week a nasty anti-Mormon remark was made, of course nothing was done then, either.

I_C on August 25, 2009 at 9:36 PM

Maybe we need the boss to take a look. Allah seems to be unimpressed.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 9:37 PM

First to the dumb ass scum bag liberal
who DARES to complain about how disabled this veteran is?

How about this you pussy asswipe..
You liberals think every drug addict licking a swashed
toad on the road is disabled and needs free
housing, cars, whores and condoms..

so you liberal asswipes
i think this veteran even if he is walking after suffering injuries suffered in defense of this great nation
Is WAY more elligle for disability than
all of your DRUGGED out
Wacked out, pot smoking, toad licking asswipes
whos only case for disability

is their INABILITY to take a shower more than once a month.

http://www.veteranoutrage.com

veteranoutrage on August 25, 2009 at 9:41 PM

welcome_ghosts on August 25, 2009 at 8:31 PM

I have seen him speak on two programs since the townhall. He is far more mentally stable than you could ever be.

Your sickness is to the bone. That is obvious.

CWforFreedom on August 25, 2009 at 9:42 PM

this troll better be gone by now. last week a nasty anti-Mormon remark was made, of course nothing was done then, either.

I_C on August 25, 2009 at 9:36 PM

Never fear…it’s gonna be gone before long…

The Asshole is strong with this one…..

BigWyo on August 25, 2009 at 9:43 PM

Oh and sorry for all of the misspells
i get a little bit flustered by these liberals

veteranoutrage on August 25, 2009 at 9:43 PM

You mean like appearing on Hannity and spouting more “Nazi” rhetoric?

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:19 PM

You truly are a piece of work. You are bought and paid for. You really cannot think for yourself. Do you not get he was playing on the left’s use of the Nazi card?

CWforFreedom on August 25, 2009 at 9:44 PM

veteranoutrage on August 25, 2009 at 9:43 PM

We alll do it. NP

CWforFreedom on August 25, 2009 at 9:45 PM

Oh and sorry for all of the misspells
i get a little bit flustered by these liberals

veteranoutrage on August 25, 2009 at 9:43 PM

Well said. And thank you.

HornetSting on August 25, 2009 at 10:03 PM

Oh and sorry for all of the misspells
i get a little bit flustered by these liberals

veteranoutrage on August 25, 2009 at 9:43 PM

Don’t get flustered. These assholes can get their shits and giggles while they’re in power, but they’re going to have their “heroes” are going to be kicked to the curb in 2010. Mark my words. We will take this country back.

NathanG on August 25, 2009 at 10:03 PM

Does that count as “going after her”? I eagerly await your response.

crr6 on August 25, 2009 at 9:01 PM

Grannie Rictus had her goons working. lol.

Campaign staffers also note each incident, including today’s early morning incident, has followed closely on the heels of a confrontation with Cindy Sheehan’s opponent Nancy Pelosi. This morning’s incident occurred after an on-air confrontation between the two candidates on KQED’s public affairs program Forum with Michael Krasny on Wednesday morning.

“Each time we confront her, each time we ask her for a debate, each time we gain ground in the polls, something horrible happens,” said Burns. “Once or twice might be a coincidence, but such a consistent correlation is hard to ignore.”

Itchee Dryback on August 25, 2009 at 10:12 PM

Am I going crazy, or have I seen this video like a few weeks ago? I could have sworn I was getting a weird sense of deja vu.

iamse7en on August 25, 2009 at 10:21 PM

this troll better be gone by now. last week a nasty anti-Mormon remark was made, of course nothing was done then, either.

I_C on August 25, 2009 at 9:36 PM

Personally, I like the trolls. Its fascinating to realize that beings can actually function..eat, sleep, crap, and actually peck away at a keyboard and only have two or three synapses sporadically firing. Its amazing to me. Truly there must be a God because that just can’t be an accident of chance.. natural selection would have had the animals outsmarting and eating them long ago. They are little more than animated Hot Pockets without the frosting.

Itchee Dryback on August 25, 2009 at 10:22 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3