<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did the UK trade Lockerbie bomber for oil contracts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tel-Chai Nation</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-2/#comment-2632540</link>
		<dc:creator>Tel-Chai Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2632540</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Free speech fades away in Britain...&lt;/strong&gt;

Robert Spencer writes on Human Events about how Britain is shutting out free speech in discussing Islam and jihad...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Free speech fades away in Britain&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Robert Spencer writes on Human Events about how Britain is shutting out free speech in discussing Islam and jihad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruh Roh: Questions Arise About Megrahi&#8217;s Real Health Status : The American Pundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-2/#comment-2622470</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruh Roh: Questions Arise About Megrahi&#8217;s Real Health Status : The American Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2622470</guid>
		<description>[...] our supposed allies trading a man who killed hundreds of people in order to make a profit. In fact, Ghadaffi hinted at there being an oil deal in the release &#8212; a claim his son later flat-out made. It&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our supposed allies trading a man who killed hundreds of people in order to make a profit. In fact, Ghadaffi hinted at there being an oil deal in the release &#8212; a claim his son later flat-out made. It&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace of Spades HQ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-2/#comment-2622461</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace of Spades HQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2622461</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Scottish Government:  It&#039;s Like Totally Tasteless to Ask Questions Like &quot;What Doctor Said That Megrahi Only Had Weeks to Live&quot; and Stuff...&lt;/strong&gt;

The only doctor who made this claim wasn&#039;t an oncologist or even a urologist (who might know something about the prostate). In fact, he might have been directly employed by the Libyans. The medical report stated that the less than......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Scottish Government:  It&#8217;s Like Totally Tasteless to Ask Questions Like &#8220;What Doctor Said That Megrahi Only Had Weeks to Live&#8221; and Stuff&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The only doctor who made this claim wasn&#8217;t an oncologist or even a urologist (who might know something about the prostate). In fact, he might have been directly employed by the Libyans. The medical report stated that the less than&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Did Megrahi only have weeks to live?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-2/#comment-2621541</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Did Megrahi only have weeks to live?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2621541</guid>
		<description>[...] Both parties now want the doctor identified in order to determine whether the government allowed itself to get hoodwinked by the Libyans.  The alternative theory would be that the government wanted to construct a good cover story for Megrahi&#8217;s release for other reasons &#8212; for instance, oil deals, as Moammar Gaddafi hinted and his son flat-out claimed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Both parties now want the doctor identified in order to determine whether the government allowed itself to get hoodwinked by the Libyans.  The alternative theory would be that the government wanted to construct a good cover story for Megrahi&#8217;s release for other reasons &#8212; for instance, oil deals, as Moammar Gaddafi hinted and his son flat-out claimed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geezer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-2/#comment-2619458</link>
		<dc:creator>Geezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2619458</guid>
		<description>Hey Ed...

I’ve really come to respect...
You’re always on the cusp of the defining certitude...
I luv it...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ed&#8230;</p>
<p>I’ve really come to respect&#8230;<br />
You’re always on the cusp of the defining certitude&#8230;<br />
I luv it&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grunchy Cranola</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-2/#comment-2617659</link>
		<dc:creator>Grunchy Cranola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2617659</guid>
		<description>And now it equates victims’ compensation funds with prostitution that Kaddafi was right to describe widows, orphans and aging parents as a bunch of “greedy” whores.
--It does? Wow. This news to it. Obviously it needs to work on its blogside manner.

Though it must disagree with this assertion: it thinks that&#039;s an incorrect extrapolation. The statement was in reference to the main point of this thread; that the return of Megrahi pivoted (mostly/partly?) on burgeoning petrol contracts between Libya and the UK, which &lt;strike&gt;spanks &lt;/strike&gt;smacks of politics, and therefore prostitution. What Ghadaffi the Younger thinks doesn&#039;t really concern it.

What’s this then?
--Fair action by the sound of things. Good on them.

Speaking of turnabout, a (believe it or not) friendly suggestion: if you want to claim the moral high ground, drop the Gollum-gone-Thelma Harper routine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now it equates victims’ compensation funds with prostitution that Kaddafi was right to describe widows, orphans and aging parents as a bunch of “greedy” whores.<br />
&#8211;It does? Wow. This news to it. Obviously it needs to work on its blogside manner.</p>
<p>Though it must disagree with this assertion: it thinks that&#8217;s an incorrect extrapolation. The statement was in reference to the main point of this thread; that the return of Megrahi pivoted (mostly/partly?) on burgeoning petrol contracts between Libya and the UK, which <strike>spanks </strike>smacks of politics, and therefore prostitution. What Ghadaffi the Younger thinks doesn&#8217;t really concern it.</p>
<p>What’s this then?<br />
&#8211;Fair action by the sound of things. Good on them.</p>
<p>Speaking of turnabout, a (believe it or not) friendly suggestion: if you want to claim the moral high ground, drop the Gollum-gone-Thelma Harper routine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terp Mole</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-2/#comment-2617072</link>
		<dc:creator>Terp Mole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2617072</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s this then?&lt;blockquote&gt;BBC: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8219433.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Call for Libya to pay IRA victims&lt;/a&gt;

Relatives of IRA terrorist victims have renewed their calls for compensation from Libya following the release of the Lockerbie bomber.

During the Troubles, Libya supplied guns and explosives to the IRA, and the families want the country to face up to its responsibilities.

They are calling on the Libyan leader to &lt;strong&gt;demonstrate the same compassion shown to Abdelbaset Ali Al Megrahi&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;/nemo me impune lacessit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s this then?<br />
<blockquote>BBC: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8219433.stm" rel="nofollow">Call for Libya to pay IRA victims</a></p>
<p>Relatives of IRA terrorist victims have renewed their calls for compensation from Libya following the release of the Lockerbie bomber.</p>
<p>During the Troubles, Libya supplied guns and explosives to the IRA, and the families want the country to face up to its responsibilities.</p>
<p>They are calling on the Libyan leader to <strong>demonstrate the same compassion shown to Abdelbaset Ali Al Megrahi</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>/nemo me impune lacessit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terp Mole</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-2/#comment-2617054</link>
		<dc:creator>Terp Mole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2617054</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;No. I wondered how creepy you are for maintaining “improved relations” (secured by releasing this thug) are worth the price of inflicting this awful agony– on victims’ widows, orphans and aging parents– if only “accompanied by little fanfare.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Idiotarian sneered: &quot;I am shocked that you could conspire to violate the survivors’ dignity for petroleum, among other things.” I think it was Reagan who said something about politics resembling the world’s oldest profession.&lt;/blockquote&gt;And now it equates victims&#039; compensation funds with prostitution-- that Kaddafi was right to describe widows, orphans and aging parents as a bunch of &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/gaddafi-son-slams-very-greedy-lockerbie-families-912531.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;greedy&lt;/a&gt;&quot; whores.

So, that&#039;s how creepy it is, folks. Now we know. Pray we never meet in person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>No. I wondered how creepy you are for maintaining “improved relations” (secured by releasing this thug) are worth the price of inflicting this awful agony– on victims’ widows, orphans and aging parents– if only “accompanied by little fanfare.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Idiotarian sneered: &#8220;I am shocked that you could conspire to violate the survivors’ dignity for petroleum, among other things.” I think it was Reagan who said something about politics resembling the world’s oldest profession.</p></blockquote>
<p>And now it equates victims&#8217; compensation funds with prostitution&#8211; that Kaddafi was right to describe widows, orphans and aging parents as a bunch of &#8220;<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/gaddafi-son-slams-very-greedy-lockerbie-families-912531.html" rel="nofollow">greedy</a>&#8221; whores.</p>
<p>So, that&#8217;s how creepy it is, folks. Now we know. Pray we never meet in person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grunchy Cranola</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-2/#comment-2612913</link>
		<dc:creator>Grunchy Cranola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2612913</guid>
		<description>Not according to the IRA victims who (yes) still hold Kaddafi responsible for the IRA’s bloody atrocities. 
--As opposed to non-bloody atrocities?

Presumably some of the victims who aren&#039;t included in this tort may hold other people (Loyalist paramilitaries, IRA splinter groups) responsible as well. But I trust you know exactly what all the aggrieved think and who they blame.

And your moronic insinuation that ILLICIT arms shipments are (somehow) morally equivalent to Kaddafi’s LICIT Libyan state-sponsorship shows very weak reasoning skills.
--I didn&#039;t insinuate that - I was pointing out that Ghadaffi didn&#039;t direct IRA policy and only provided a portion of the &quot;tools&quot; used to further their politics. Re: legality, Ghadaffi&#039;s &quot;donations&quot; &lt;em&gt;weren&#039;t &lt;/em&gt;licit, either; that&#039;s why they were typically smuggled on liners and container ships (e.g. the &lt;em&gt;Claudia &lt;/em&gt;affair). 

One major moral difference, if you like, is that the arms shipments from the US didn&#039;t have the stamp of a US President, whereas Libyan equipment probably couldn&#039;t have left that state without official state assistance. Another is that arming rather unpleasant &quot;revolutionary&quot; groups was a disproportionately focal part of Libyan foreign policy.

None of this changes the fact that the IRA were (and maybe are) dependent on arm supplies from North America and places outside Libya - including old British Army hardware.

No. I wondered how creepy you are for maintaining “improved relations” (secured by releasing this thug) are worth the price of inflicting this awful agony– on victims’ widows, orphans and aging parents– if only “accompanied by little fanfare.”
--Since oil is at the heart of the accusation in this thread, I&#039;ll take that as a &quot;yes, I am shocked that you could conspire to violate the survivors&#039; dignity for petroleum, among other things.&quot; I think it was Reagan who said something about politics resembling the world&#039;s oldest profession.

Because clearly, their suffering doesn’t concern you.
--Outside of killing this man (mentioned earlier, not the worst alternative as these things go), I&#039;m not sure how their suffering could be eased. Doubtless this little escapade didn&#039;t help. Their story is moving but I don&#039;t pretend to share their grief or speak for them; some, surprisingly, supported Megrahi&#039;s release. 

I regret my support of his release given the consequences, even despite the possible benefits it might have accrued. But in this instance like a lot of things, words carry little weight after the fact.

Grade: F
--Would that be &quot;fantastic&quot; or &quot;flattering?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not according to the IRA victims who (yes) still hold Kaddafi responsible for the IRA’s bloody atrocities.<br />
&#8211;As opposed to non-bloody atrocities?</p>
<p>Presumably some of the victims who aren&#8217;t included in this tort may hold other people (Loyalist paramilitaries, IRA splinter groups) responsible as well. But I trust you know exactly what all the aggrieved think and who they blame.</p>
<p>And your moronic insinuation that ILLICIT arms shipments are (somehow) morally equivalent to Kaddafi’s LICIT Libyan state-sponsorship shows very weak reasoning skills.<br />
&#8211;I didn&#8217;t insinuate that &#8211; I was pointing out that Ghadaffi didn&#8217;t direct IRA policy and only provided a portion of the &#8220;tools&#8221; used to further their politics. Re: legality, Ghadaffi&#8217;s &#8220;donations&#8221; <em>weren&#8217;t </em>licit, either; that&#8217;s why they were typically smuggled on liners and container ships (e.g. the <em>Claudia </em>affair). </p>
<p>One major moral difference, if you like, is that the arms shipments from the US didn&#8217;t have the stamp of a US President, whereas Libyan equipment probably couldn&#8217;t have left that state without official state assistance. Another is that arming rather unpleasant &#8220;revolutionary&#8221; groups was a disproportionately focal part of Libyan foreign policy.</p>
<p>None of this changes the fact that the IRA were (and maybe are) dependent on arm supplies from North America and places outside Libya &#8211; including old British Army hardware.</p>
<p>No. I wondered how creepy you are for maintaining “improved relations” (secured by releasing this thug) are worth the price of inflicting this awful agony– on victims’ widows, orphans and aging parents– if only “accompanied by little fanfare.”<br />
&#8211;Since oil is at the heart of the accusation in this thread, I&#8217;ll take that as a &#8220;yes, I am shocked that you could conspire to violate the survivors&#8217; dignity for petroleum, among other things.&#8221; I think it was Reagan who said something about politics resembling the world&#8217;s oldest profession.</p>
<p>Because clearly, their suffering doesn’t concern you.<br />
&#8211;Outside of killing this man (mentioned earlier, not the worst alternative as these things go), I&#8217;m not sure how their suffering could be eased. Doubtless this little escapade didn&#8217;t help. Their story is moving but I don&#8217;t pretend to share their grief or speak for them; some, surprisingly, supported Megrahi&#8217;s release. </p>
<p>I regret my support of his release given the consequences, even despite the possible benefits it might have accrued. But in this instance like a lot of things, words carry little weight after the fact.</p>
<p>Grade: F<br />
&#8211;Would that be &#8220;fantastic&#8221; or &#8220;flattering?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: utbw42</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-2/#comment-2612469</link>
		<dc:creator>utbw42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2612469</guid>
		<description>part of the new &quot;Bombers For Oil&quot; program....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>part of the new &#8220;Bombers For Oil&#8221; program&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobydutch</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-2/#comment-2611829</link>
		<dc:creator>mobydutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2611829</guid>
		<description>Time for Mr. Obama to apologize for our arrogance and give Gaddafi a big hug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time for Mr. Obama to apologize for our arrogance and give Gaddafi a big hug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: argos</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2611731</link>
		<dc:creator>argos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2611731</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s simply astounding.  British manhood is no more.  I never thought I&#039;d live to see it, but the evidence is irrefutable.  Everything that Churchill said about the English character is now stone cold myth.  I suppose we should open our shores to their survivors, but what would we get out of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s simply astounding.  British manhood is no more.  I never thought I&#8217;d live to see it, but the evidence is irrefutable.  Everything that Churchill said about the English character is now stone cold myth.  I suppose we should open our shores to their survivors, but what would we get out of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terp Mole</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2611207</link>
		<dc:creator>Terp Mole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2611207</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;idiotarian drooled: &lt;em&gt;Pretty sure the IRA was the IRA&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Not according to the IRA victims who (yes) still &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/29/northernireland-libya&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hold Kaddafi responsible&lt;/a&gt; for the IRA&#039;s bloody atrocities. They can no longer afford to ignore the kabuki theatre of Libyan state-sponsorship.

And your moronic insinuation that ILLICIT arms shipments are (somehow) morally equivalent to Kaddafi&#039;s LICIT Libyan state-sponsorship shows very weak reasoning skills.&lt;blockquote&gt;idiotarian sneered: Are you saying oil isn’t worth blood?&lt;/blockquote&gt;No. I wondered how creepy you are for maintaining “&lt;em&gt;improved relations&lt;/em&gt;” (secured by releasing this thug) are worth the price of inflicting this awful agony– on victims’ widows, orphans and aging parents– if only “&lt;em&gt;accompanied by little fanfare&lt;/em&gt;.” Because clearly, their suffering doesn&#039;t concern you.&lt;blockquote&gt;idiotarian sneered: Sending him to die elsewhere won’t bring their families back.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Gee, thanks for reminding folks-- as if that trite remark justifies Megrahi&#039;s release. MacAskill&#039;s appeasement conceit (cheapening the value of innocent blood) will only invite more terrorism against other families-- as surely as rewarding Kaddafi will only embolden his jihadist proteges, imitators and competitors.

Grade: F

/&lt;em&gt;dismissed&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>idiotarian drooled: <em>Pretty sure the IRA was the IRA</em>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not according to the IRA victims who (yes) still <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/29/northernireland-libya" rel="nofollow">hold Kaddafi responsible</a> for the IRA&#8217;s bloody atrocities. They can no longer afford to ignore the kabuki theatre of Libyan state-sponsorship.</p>
<p>And your moronic insinuation that ILLICIT arms shipments are (somehow) morally equivalent to Kaddafi&#8217;s LICIT Libyan state-sponsorship shows very weak reasoning skills.<br />
<blockquote>idiotarian sneered: Are you saying oil isn’t worth blood?</p></blockquote>
<p>No. I wondered how creepy you are for maintaining “<em>improved relations</em>” (secured by releasing this thug) are worth the price of inflicting this awful agony– on victims’ widows, orphans and aging parents– if only “<em>accompanied by little fanfare</em>.” Because clearly, their suffering doesn&#8217;t concern you.<br />
<blockquote>idiotarian sneered: Sending him to die elsewhere won’t bring their families back.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gee, thanks for reminding folks&#8211; as if that trite remark justifies Megrahi&#8217;s release. MacAskill&#8217;s appeasement conceit (cheapening the value of innocent blood) will only invite more terrorism against other families&#8211; as surely as rewarding Kaddafi will only embolden his jihadist proteges, imitators and competitors.</p>
<p>Grade: F</p>
<p>/<em>dismissed</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grunchy Cranola</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2611078</link>
		<dc:creator>Grunchy Cranola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2611078</guid>
		<description>The sad irony (lost on Brits) is that Kaddafi was the IRA.
--Pretty sure the &lt;strong&gt;IRA&lt;/strong&gt; was the IRA (just ask the Kennedys). 

But now that you bring it up, the link you cited indicates that Republican paramilitaries obtained weapons from Europe, Libya, and, most importantly, the US. 

The &quot;Armalite and ballot box strategy&quot; of the 80s and 90s had little to do with Muammar Ghadaffi or the victims of PA103 - mostly because he didn&#039;t usually deal in US arms. Significantly, large elements of the IRA moved away from violence (the &quot;Armalite&quot;) as a political tool at the signing of the Anglo-Irish Agreement, which was a stepping stone to the (ongoing) Good Friday Agreement.

Here we see a perfect example of the dysfunctional moral compass that flew Lockerbie justice into ruin.
--Well thanks. If you&#039;re done preaching, it might have been easier to shoot him. But clearly that option wasn&#039;t on the table. Nor, apparently, is the Carthaginian scenario you&#039;ve hinted at.

The oil “improved relations” secured by releasing this thug is (apparently) worth the price of inflicting this awful agony...
--Are you saying oil &lt;em&gt;isn&#039;t &lt;/em&gt;worth blood? Maybe I&#039;m the only one who found that slogan insulting for the wrong reasons.

That release might be worth it &lt;em&gt;if &lt;/em&gt;it helps influence a Libyan regime (Ghadaffi or not) to &lt;em&gt;reject&lt;/em&gt;terrorism as a central plank of its foreign policy.

not the agony WE inflicted upon the victims’ loved ones...
--Sending him to die elsewhere won&#039;t bring their families back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad irony (lost on Brits) is that Kaddafi was the IRA.<br />
&#8211;Pretty sure the <strong>IRA</strong> was the IRA (just ask the Kennedys). </p>
<p>But now that you bring it up, the link you cited indicates that Republican paramilitaries obtained weapons from Europe, Libya, and, most importantly, the US. </p>
<p>The &#8220;Armalite and ballot box strategy&#8221; of the 80s and 90s had little to do with Muammar Ghadaffi or the victims of PA103 &#8211; mostly because he didn&#8217;t usually deal in US arms. Significantly, large elements of the IRA moved away from violence (the &#8220;Armalite&#8221;) as a political tool at the signing of the Anglo-Irish Agreement, which was a stepping stone to the (ongoing) Good Friday Agreement.</p>
<p>Here we see a perfect example of the dysfunctional moral compass that flew Lockerbie justice into ruin.<br />
&#8211;Well thanks. If you&#8217;re done preaching, it might have been easier to shoot him. But clearly that option wasn&#8217;t on the table. Nor, apparently, is the Carthaginian scenario you&#8217;ve hinted at.</p>
<p>The oil “improved relations” secured by releasing this thug is (apparently) worth the price of inflicting this awful agony&#8230;<br />
&#8211;Are you saying oil <em>isn&#8217;t </em>worth blood? Maybe I&#8217;m the only one who found that slogan insulting for the wrong reasons.</p>
<p>That release might be worth it <em>if </em>it helps influence a Libyan regime (Ghadaffi or not) to <em>reject</em>terrorism as a central plank of its foreign policy.</p>
<p>not the agony WE inflicted upon the victims’ loved ones&#8230;<br />
&#8211;Sending him to die elsewhere won&#8217;t bring their families back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred 2</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2610881</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2610881</guid>
		<description>Why does this remind me of an episode from &quot;Yes, Prime Minister&quot;? That time I think it had something to do with aircraft orders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does this remind me of an episode from &#8220;Yes, Prime Minister&#8221;? That time I think it had something to do with aircraft orders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terp Mole</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2610061</link>
		<dc:creator>Terp Mole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2610061</guid>
		<description>linky repair

/&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemo_me_impune_lacessit&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nemo me impune lacessit&lt;/a&gt;… &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthago_delenda_est&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kaddafi delenda est&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>linky repair</p>
<p>/<em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemo_me_impune_lacessit" rel="nofollow">Nemo me impune lacessit</a>… <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthago_delenda_est" rel="nofollow">Kaddafi delenda est</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terp Mole</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2610037</link>
		<dc:creator>Terp Mole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2610037</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Grunchy Cranola: &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I supported the release of this thug &lt;/strong&gt;on the condition that he was on his last legs, that it would &lt;strong&gt;improve relations&lt;/strong&gt; with a regime that I despise but has moderated its behaviour towards the outside world, and that it would be accompanied &lt;strong&gt;by little fanfare&lt;/strong&gt;. I should have known they would pull a Kuntar&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Here we see a perfect example of the dysfunctional moral compass that flew Lockerbie justice into ruin.

The &lt;strike&gt;oil&lt;/strike&gt; &quot;&lt;em&gt;improved relations&lt;/em&gt;&quot; secured by releasing this thug is (&lt;em&gt;apparently&lt;/em&gt;) worth the price of inflicting &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article6794586.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this awful agony&lt;/a&gt;-- on victims&#039; widows, orphans and aging parents-- if only &quot;&lt;em&gt;accompanied by little fanfare&lt;/em&gt;.&quot;

The shame of a cheering Libya mob-- not &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article6794586.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the agony WE inflicted&lt;/a&gt; upon the victims&#039; loved ones-- is all many find objectionable.

That appalling nihilistic animus is precisely what motivated this grotesque Faustian bargain.

/&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemo_me_impune_lacessit&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nemo me impune lacessit&lt;/a&gt;... &lt;a href=&quot;en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthago_delenda_est &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kaddafi delenda est&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Grunchy Cranola: <em><strong>I supported the release of this thug </strong>on the condition that he was on his last legs, that it would <strong>improve relations</strong> with a regime that I despise but has moderated its behaviour towards the outside world, and that it would be accompanied <strong>by little fanfare</strong>. I should have known they would pull a Kuntar</em>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here we see a perfect example of the dysfunctional moral compass that flew Lockerbie justice into ruin.</p>
<p>The <strike>oil</strike> &#8220;<em>improved relations</em>&#8221; secured by releasing this thug is (<em>apparently</em>) worth the price of inflicting <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article6794586.ece" rel="nofollow">this awful agony</a>&#8211; on victims&#8217; widows, orphans and aging parents&#8211; if only &#8220;<em>accompanied by little fanfare</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>The shame of a cheering Libya mob&#8211; not <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article6794586.ece" rel="nofollow">the agony WE inflicted</a> upon the victims&#8217; loved ones&#8211; is all many find objectionable.</p>
<p>That appalling nihilistic animus is precisely what motivated this grotesque Faustian bargain.</p>
<p>/<em><a href="en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemo_me_impune_lacessit" rel="nofollow">nemo me impune lacessit</a>&#8230; <a href="en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthago_delenda_est " rel="nofollow">Kaddafi delenda est</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terp Mole</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2610005</link>
		<dc:creator>Terp Mole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2610005</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Grunchy Cranola: &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The IRA lost in Northern Ireland&lt;/strong&gt; and show little enthusiasm for a second round with their countrymen. It appears &lt;strong&gt;British diplomacy had a role in their disarmament&lt;/strong&gt; programme&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;The sad irony (lost on Brits) is that &lt;strong&gt;Kaddafi was the IRA&lt;/strong&gt;. Kaddafi financed, supported, trained and armed the IRA for decades.

Up to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2006/mar/19/uk.northernireland&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;6,000 innocents&lt;/a&gt; were killed or injured with Libyan supplied guns and explosives. And many IRA bombs employed the same &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_IRA_arms_importation&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Semtex&lt;/a&gt; that destroyed Clipper Maid of the Seas.

IRA victims still seek to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/29/northernireland-libya&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hold Kaddafi accountable&lt;/a&gt; for those countless bloody atrocities.

Kaddafi&#039;s IRA proxies might still be in business if not for the tireless efforts of the Victims of Pan Am 103 to sanction and isolate Libya.

/&lt;em&gt;and no good deed goes unpunished&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Grunchy Cranola: <em><strong>The IRA lost in Northern Ireland</strong> and show little enthusiasm for a second round with their countrymen. It appears <strong>British diplomacy had a role in their disarmament</strong> programme</em>.</p></blockquote>
<p>The sad irony (lost on Brits) is that <strong>Kaddafi was the IRA</strong>. Kaddafi financed, supported, trained and armed the IRA for decades.</p>
<p>Up to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2006/mar/19/uk.northernireland" rel="nofollow">6,000 innocents</a> were killed or injured with Libyan supplied guns and explosives. And many IRA bombs employed the same <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_IRA_arms_importation" rel="nofollow">Semtex</a> that destroyed Clipper Maid of the Seas.</p>
<p>IRA victims still seek to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/29/northernireland-libya" rel="nofollow">hold Kaddafi accountable</a> for those countless bloody atrocities.</p>
<p>Kaddafi&#8217;s IRA proxies might still be in business if not for the tireless efforts of the Victims of Pan Am 103 to sanction and isolate Libya.</p>
<p>/<em>and no good deed goes unpunished</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terp Mole</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2609982</link>
		<dc:creator>Terp Mole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2609982</guid>
		<description>Down the memory hole: Lockerbie bomber received &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/1868930.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;exquisite care&lt;/a&gt; inside &lt;strike&gt;Scottish jail&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/1147904.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Kaddafi cafe&lt;/a&gt; while the grand wizard of rehabilated terrorists &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/Lockerbie/Story/0,2763,740130,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nelson Mandela lobbied tirelessly&lt;/a&gt; for release.&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Megrahi is all alone,&quot; Mr Mandela told a packed press conference in the prison&#039;s visitors&#039; room. &quot;He has nobody he can talk to. &lt;strong&gt;It is a psychological persecution that a man must stay for the length of his long sentence all alone&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Kaddafi even bought Megrahi&#039;s wife and children an &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/2487091.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;estate in Glasgow&lt;/a&gt;.

/&lt;em&gt;&quot;compassionate release&quot; is a rancid lie&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Down the memory hole: Lockerbie bomber received <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/1868930.stm" rel="nofollow">exquisite care</a> inside <strike>Scottish jail</strike> <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/1147904.stm" rel="nofollow">The Kaddafi cafe</a> while the grand wizard of rehabilated terrorists <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Lockerbie/Story/0,2763,740130,00.html" rel="nofollow">Nelson Mandela lobbied tirelessly</a> for release.<br />
<blockquote>&#8220;Megrahi is all alone,&#8221; Mr Mandela told a packed press conference in the prison&#8217;s visitors&#8217; room. &#8220;He has nobody he can talk to. <strong>It is a psychological persecution that a man must stay for the length of his long sentence all alone</strong>.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Kaddafi even bought Megrahi&#8217;s wife and children an <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/2487091.stm" rel="nofollow">estate in Glasgow</a>.</p>
<p>/<em>&#8220;compassionate release&#8221; is a rancid lie</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakko77</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2609756</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakko77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2609756</guid>
		<description>Churchill, we need you more than ever... or at least the Brits do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Churchill, we need you more than ever&#8230; or at least the Brits do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grunchy Cranola</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2609147</link>
		<dc:creator>Grunchy Cranola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2609147</guid>
		<description>The IRA lost in Northern Ireland and show little enthusiasm for a second round with their countrymen. It appears British diplomacy had a role in their disarmament programme. The Taliban are another story.

While one may empathize with the idea of compassion for the dying, the consequences of this decision - giving Ghadaffi&#039;s purported hundreds of supporters and the worst of the Arab world a &quot;victory&quot; - are not commensurate with that principle. 

I supported the release of this thug on the condition that he was on his last legs, that it would improve relations with a regime that I despise but has moderated its behaviour towards the outside world, and that it would be accompanied by little fanfare. I should have known they would pull a Kuntar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IRA lost in Northern Ireland and show little enthusiasm for a second round with their countrymen. It appears British diplomacy had a role in their disarmament programme. The Taliban are another story.</p>
<p>While one may empathize with the idea of compassion for the dying, the consequences of this decision &#8211; giving Ghadaffi&#8217;s purported hundreds of supporters and the worst of the Arab world a &#8220;victory&#8221; &#8211; are not commensurate with that principle. </p>
<p>I supported the release of this thug on the condition that he was on his last legs, that it would improve relations with a regime that I despise but has moderated its behaviour towards the outside world, and that it would be accompanied by little fanfare. I should have known they would pull a Kuntar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2609070</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2609070</guid>
		<description>One the face of it this looks like an absolute disgrace. 

Not hard to believe the British government would do this though given their shameful surrender to the IRA and desire to negotiate with the &#039;moderate&#039; elements of the Taliban.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One the face of it this looks like an absolute disgrace. </p>
<p>Not hard to believe the British government would do this though given their shameful surrender to the IRA and desire to negotiate with the &#8216;moderate&#8217; elements of the Taliban.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Was Lockerbie bomber released for oil contracts? &#124; The Lonely Conservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2608840</link>
		<dc:creator>Was Lockerbie bomber released for oil contracts? &#124; The Lonely Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2608840</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrissey has more on the subject, including information suggesting this had been in the works for some time. But not to worry, the British are thinking about cancelling Prince Charles&#8217;s trip to Libya to celebrate 40 years of a Gaddafi dictatorship. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey has more on the subject, including information suggesting this had been in the works for some time. But not to worry, the British are thinking about cancelling Prince Charles&#8217;s trip to Libya to celebrate 40 years of a Gaddafi dictatorship. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did The U.K. Trade Lockerbie Bommber for Oil Contracts?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2608214</link>
		<dc:creator>Did The U.K. Trade Lockerbie Bommber for Oil Contracts?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2608214</guid>
		<description>[...] for oil contracts?  posted at 8:00 am on August 22, 2009 by Ed Morrissey  Share on Facebook &#124; printer-friendly   The outrage over the release of the bomber and mass murderer responsible for killing 270 innocent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for oil contracts?  posted at 8:00 am on August 22, 2009 by Ed Morrissey  Share on Facebook | printer-friendly   The outrage over the release of the bomber and mass murderer responsible for killing 270 innocent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJL</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/22/did-the-uk-trade-lockerbie-bomber-for-oil-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2608209</link>
		<dc:creator>RJL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=63139#comment-2608209</guid>
		<description>From the &quot;trial balloon&quot; link dated April 20th:

&lt;blockquote&gt;This would allow Megrahi &quot;to continue his sentence in a Libyan prison, particularly since he is suffering from an advanced stage of cancer and &lt;strong&gt;has only a few weeks left to live&lt;/strong&gt;,&quot; the source added on condition of anonymity.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Back in April he had only a few weeks to live, it&#039;s now late August and yet somehow he&#039;s still alive.  

I feel a miraculous recovery in the works or perhaps a very quick death with no one able to see the body and then Megrahi and his entire family will disappear from public view to an undisclosed location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the &#8220;trial balloon&#8221; link dated April 20th:</p>
<blockquote><p>This would allow Megrahi &#8220;to continue his sentence in a Libyan prison, particularly since he is suffering from an advanced stage of cancer and <strong>has only a few weeks left to live</strong>,&#8221; the source added on condition of anonymity.</p></blockquote>
<p>Back in April he had only a few weeks to live, it&#8217;s now late August and yet somehow he&#8217;s still alive.  </p>
<p>I feel a miraculous recovery in the works or perhaps a very quick death with no one able to see the body and then Megrahi and his entire family will disappear from public view to an undisclosed location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
