Did the UK trade Lockerbie bomber for oil contracts?
posted at 8:00 am on August 22, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
The outrage over the release of the bomber and mass murderer responsible for killing 270 innocent people grew overnight as a key Libyan political figure claimed that the release came as part of a commercial deal. Seif al-Islam, the son of Libyan strongman Moammar Gaddafi, met Abdelbaset Ali Mohmet al-Megrahi at the airport and proclaimed him a hero in a display that embarrassed the UK when video of it hit British televisions. Gaddafi’s son then told interviewers that British commercial interests had required Megrahi’s release:
The release of Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset Ali Mohmet al-Megrahi was linked to trade deals with Britain, Seif al-Islam, the son of Libyan leader Moamer Kadhafi, said in a interview. …
“In all commercial contracts, for oil and gas with Britain, (Megrahi) was always on the negotiating table,” said Islam, interviewed late Thursday as he accompanied Megrahi on the flight back from Scotland to Libya.
“All British interests were linked to the release of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi,” Islam said in an interview broadcast by Libyan TV channel Al Mutawassit on Friday.
The Brown government in London quickly denied any commercial deal for Megrahi:
The claims were vehemently denied by the UK government.
A Foreign Office spokesman said: “There is no deal. All decisions relating to Megrahi’s case have been exclusively for Scottish ministers, the Crown Office in Scotland and the Scottish judicial authorities.
“No deal has been made between the UK government and Libya in relation to Megrahi and any commercial interests in the country.”
This has turned into a massive embarrassment for Brown and his advisers. They have been reduced to admitting that they urgently requested Libya not to stage a hero’s welcome for Megrahi in order to keep from angering British voters. That effort failed miserably, as even before al-Islam’s remarks hit the televisions, Brits had reacted with shock and anger to Megrahi’s release.
And what will the British do now? They say they’re reconsidering plans to have Prince Andrew attend Moammar Gaddafi’s 40th anniversary of his dictatorship. Andrew, not coincidentally, represents British trade interests in Libya, including oil and gas contracts. Hmmmm.
The abject nature of Britain’s response to the celebrations, as well as al-Islam’s revelations, won’t ease that anger one bit. The British have utterly fumbled this situation from top to bottom.
Update: My friend Scott Johnson at Power Line hears from one of their regular correspondents, whose personal experience indicates that this decision was driven by commercial interests and Gordon Brown. However, the British may not have been the only ones to fumble this:
I’ve been quite perplexed at the characterization of this as a Scottish decision, as my friend spoke of it in terms of something that had already been cleared conditionally by the courts and had been signed off on by the Prime Minister. In fact, he pointed me toward this February 2009 AFP article, mentioning that it was a trial balloon from the British government to test the reaction in the US and UK.
Note the date. They had not detected much anger of the article, so they British government had already decided that they would acquiesce to the Libyan request. He was also very explicit that they had informed the US of their plans to release him.
Sounds like either the White House, the State Department, or both were asleep at the switch. Either that, or Hillary Clinton was too busy making a reset button to care.
Update II: It doesn’t get any better for Britain, as Gaddafi himself hints that commercial interests drove Megrahi’s release:
Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi hugged the convicted Lockerbie bomber and promised more cooperation with Britain in gratitude for his release, while London and Washington condemned his “hero’s welcome” home.
Meeting Abdel Basset al-Megrahi and his family late on Friday, Gaddafi thanked British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Queen Elizabeth for “encouraging” Scotland to release the dying prisoner from a Scottish jail, Libyan news agency JANA reported. …
“This step is in the interest of relations between the two countries … and of the personal friendship between me and them and will be positively reflected for sure in all areas of cooperation between the two countries,” the Libyan leader said.
Gaddafi’s comments drew a flat denial from Britain that Megrahi’s release was in any way linked to business deals with Libya, which has Africa’s largest proven oil reserves. Britain said all responsibility for his release rested with Scotland, which runs its own judicial affairs.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Egg on the face times a million.
SoulGlo on August 22, 2009 at 8:05 AM
Damn those three AM phone calls!
Maquis on August 22, 2009 at 8:06 AM
One bright side of being held in prison in the UK was that his prostate cancer wasn’t detected early. But other than that…
Caper29 on August 22, 2009 at 8:08 AM
If there is anything to the buzz about oil and gas, it would probably be for a British company to do the drilling in Libyan oil fields. The UK is a petroleum exporter.
Regardless, they really set themselves up. Who did they think they were dealing with?
fluffy on August 22, 2009 at 8:08 AM
Good lord, where to start on this?
elduende on August 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM
you know what? if the UK has egg on its face, then i hope they got something out of this.
but its not like Libya wouldn’t lie about this, right?
kelley in virginia on August 22, 2009 at 8:14 AM
Absolutely disgusting.
I think that this might just be the beginning though. Europe is increasingly reliant on Russia for it’s energy needs. That means that other countries that can supply some of those energy needs will have more and more leverage.
We as Americans are more or less in the same position. We, fortunately, have the ability to draw upon our own reserves of energy if we ever get the political will to develop them.
donkichi on August 22, 2009 at 8:14 AM
Everyone in Gitmo just started complaining about pain when they pee… why shouldn’t the UK let their 1 terrorist go, Obamama is letting a few hundred of the worst go…
Floriduh Jim on August 22, 2009 at 8:15 AM
Sounds like a job for a special forces sniper team to me.
Hellrider on August 22, 2009 at 8:15 AM
Sounds more like blackmail than a trade deal.
Ronnie on August 22, 2009 at 8:16 AM
This was an appalling debacle from start to finish, and I hope Gordon Brown and everybody else responsible for (or complicit in) this mess pays a heavy price for their treachery.
The victims and their families deserve so much better than this.
AZCoyote on August 22, 2009 at 8:16 AM
But wait, didn’t we just perfect the electric car? They’ve got great health care and will soon have the Chevy Volt- why wheel and deal on oil and gas? /s
BKeyser on August 22, 2009 at 8:17 AM
AZ; I agree that the victims’ families deserve better, but wouldn’t it be great if all those worthless prisoners in our US prisons were actually an asset on which we could trade?
i don’t blame the Brits for this one.
kelley in virginia on August 22, 2009 at 8:18 AM
Look at the heroes who blew up an unarmed civilian plane loaded with innocent men, women and children! How brave they were! How gallant!
Wonder if Obama’s little paw prints are on this anywhere?? Gosh,,, ya just never know sometimes. Seems like and awfully big thing to do on their own.
JellyToast on August 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM
I can’t wait for the protests about “No blood for oil!”
bekarlss on August 22, 2009 at 8:23 AM
No blood for oil.
Shockah!
jgapinoy on August 22, 2009 at 8:23 AM
of course they had an affect.
rob verdi on August 22, 2009 at 8:24 AM
Perhaps a redo of Operation El Dorado Canyon, carried out on April 15, 1986, would do the trick. Cruise missles might be better this time. Where is a Reagan when we need him?
Yoop on August 22, 2009 at 8:24 AM
So much for “no blood for oil” mantra.
maverick muse on August 22, 2009 at 8:25 AM
So, I just perused some of the left’s favorite America-hating blogs for any mention of the Lockerbie atrocity. Imagine my surprise to find not a single word at: Daily Kos, Greenwald, TPM, FireDogLake, Crooks and Liars, Juan Cole. “Talk Left” mentioned it, but only to support the decision. Heh. The left doesn’t hate America though. No. Not at all.
sbvft contributor on August 22, 2009 at 8:25 AM
Come to the UK and we’ll (re)set (button) about you.
apostic on August 22, 2009 at 8:29 AM
AZCoyote on August 22, 2009 at 8:16 AM
Agreed.
However, I certantly do not believe a word coming out of Gaddafi’s mouth. The one thing that he can be counted on doing is lying.
I guess it was nice all those years he was too afraid to say anything. With the left-o-sphere in charge of the west he has no LGB fears anymore. Makes me reget that Ronnie didn’t finish the job.
Right-brained on August 22, 2009 at 8:29 AM
ugh
blatantblue on August 22, 2009 at 8:30 AM
Amatuer Hour accross the pond too.
This new generation of world leaders should have spent a few more years in triple-A before they cast off the training wheels and played dress-up at the adult table.
These dictators have decades of experience playing hardball with true leaders, they are using this bunch as punching bags. Pathetic.
Alden Pyle on August 22, 2009 at 8:30 AM
Wasilla, Alaska.
Hellrider on August 22, 2009 at 8:35 AM
At some point, apart from the visceral damage this has done, someone is going to realize the terrible symbolism and precedent this sets.
Great Britain, a nation that once enjoyed the status of superhegemon, who’s Navy and economic power once ruled this planet, have just capitulated to the backward Libyans over the possibility of future oil contracts?
Geopolitically speaking, acts like this reverberate in history.
This demonstrates political decadence not lack of British power. Churchill must be turning in his grave.
elduende on August 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM
I thought I felt sorry for the families before, this is such an insult. I don’t quite understand Mr. Johnson’s friend assertion, is he suggesting that Britain never spoke to Washington directly but floated a news article as a balloon to see which way the wind blows. If it wasn’t for the surprise of the Uugars sent to Bermuda incident I would think this impossible.
Cindy Munford on August 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM
It’s very sad
Looking at a nation that used to have a pair.
Now they no longer do.
blatantblue on August 22, 2009 at 8:38 AM
If Scotland had used a rope some years ago, this “problem” would never have surfaced. Any rational government would have hung the idiot in the town square and been done with it.
People against the death penalty say it’s not a “deterrent”, ignoring the fact it deters hell out of the person they hang.
bradley11 on August 22, 2009 at 8:40 AM
Does anyone remember that Obama was a member of Rev Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity Church- Black Liberation Theology?
Who does Jeremiah Wright like to praise? Louis Farrakhan and didn’t Lybia try and give Farrakhan a lot of money once like over a Million Dollars and the U.S. wouldn’t let him accept it….Didn’t Obama go to the Million Man March?
There are all kinds of things going on behind the scenes and the trail always ends up back in Chicago.
Dr Evil on August 22, 2009 at 8:40 AM
Thanks for that reminder, Cindy. The home office faux-outrage at that fiasco was pretty transparent. And, isn’t it funny how all that outrage died so quickly.
I’m not sure whether this new administration is just stupid and missed the trial balloon entirely; or evil: saw the trial balloon and thought, “Meh.”
Nevermind. I’ve just decided they are extraordinarily evil. They saw the trial balloon and thought, “Good.”
IrishEi on August 22, 2009 at 8:45 AM
Dr Evil on August 22, 2009:
“*Who does Jeremiah Wright like to praise? Louis Farrakhan and didn’t Lybia try and give Farrakhan a lot of money once like over a Million Dollars and the U.S. wouldn’t let him accept it….Didn’t Obama go to the Million Man March?
August 21 2009 the day Abdelbaset Ali Mohmet al-Megrahi returned home, also the day President Obama started his vacation, and the day the Islamic religious holiday Ramadan begins …. I know its just a coincidence and I’m a racist for even contemplating coincidences.
.
philly_PA on August 22, 2009 at 8:48 AM
Actually, this is a country that still has the capacity to have “a pair” they just won’t use them.
Its cowardice and decadence masquerading as internationalism.
This sort of lack of will eventually kills a nation. Most of western Europe is on this path and so are we.
elduende on August 22, 2009 at 8:48 AM
blatantblue on August 22, 2009 at 8:38 AM
One can only hope that they “wake up” soon. Progressivism has waxed and waned in the UK for the better part of the last century. They seem shift to extremes in the UK though. For every Chamberlain they have a Churchill. For every Callaghan they have a Thatcher.
The trend seems lean more to the left but you could say that about the west as a whole.
Right-brained on August 22, 2009 at 8:51 AM
RED STATE: “Ironically ten years ago this week, when it was politically expedient for her senate run, the Clintons, with an assist from Eric Holder granted clemency to 16 equally remorse less FALN terrorists who also were convicted after fair trials”
sbvft contributor on August 22, 2009 at 8:51 AM
It will be interesting to see how many times this magic trick is performed before the great unwashed catches on. I thought that they realized that we aren’t as stupid as they believe us to be. Obviously I was wrong.
Cindy Munford on August 22, 2009 at 8:52 AM
Well that DVD gift set appears to have been a complete waste of money.
Jed_Eckert on August 22, 2009 at 8:55 AM
What’s the over/under on how long this guy lives? The February AFP story says he had a few weeks to live. Now in August, they say he has three months. What’s next, come November another year left??
Prediction: This guy is still partying two years from now.
ex Dem from Miami on August 22, 2009 at 8:58 AM
If this is true,then British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and anyone else connected to this decision to release this murderer should be forced to resign from office immediately, then the House of Parliament should conduct an immediate investigation into just high up the ladder did the order to release Abdel Basset al-Megrahi go.
And if it goes all the way to the Queen herself, I would then say Britain is in very very serious trouble.
pilamaye on August 22, 2009 at 8:59 AM
Great Britain is the perfect example of liberalism in control of government. They would sell out their own mother for a song even if it meant flushing the best interests of those they represent down the tube. Gordon Browni is a disgrace to the human race and is not fit to lead anyone. Can this be an indication of what is evolving here?
volsense on August 22, 2009 at 8:59 AM
Compassion is feeding the hungry and clothing the naked, not protesting a death sentence or letting mass murderers off early from a life sentence.
Remember the false story that Reagan traded arms for the hostages in Iran? Now it seems to have happened in reality but between Britain and Libya. Well, at least Obama said something against it whether genuine or not.
Where is the rest of the Left and all its ‘compassion’?
Liam on August 22, 2009 at 8:59 AM
WHEN THE OIL DEAL WAS ANNOUNCED, JWF PREDICTED THE BOMBER’S RELEASE WOULD HAPPEN THE NEXT DAY.
HE WAS RIGHT – AND WE LINKED TO THIS FACT IMMEDIATELY.
THESE NEW REVELATIONS MERELY BACK-UP JWF’S PREDICTION AND ANALYSIS.
THIS BIT OF BRIT APPEASEMENT IS EVERY BIT AS BAD AS THEIR SUDATELAND TREACHERY.
IT’S AN AFFRONT TO THE FREE WORLD AND THE RULE OF LAW.
GADDAFY NOWS IT AND IS FLAUNTING IT.
SICKENING.
reliapundit on August 22, 2009 at 9:00 AM
AP had a post a few days ago when al-Megrahi was first released and I left the following comment:
What are the odds that Kenny McAskill’s “humanitarian compassion” is tied to a numbered Swiss bank account? Just a thought.
Ordinary American on August 21, 2009 at 4:42 AM
I would like to apologize to Mr. McAskill. Apparently this was not about cash, but about oil and gas and apparently the responsibility lies with Gordon Brown rather than Mr. McAskill.
A word to Mr. Brown:
If you would like to give the British people a break, I have an American DVD player that I would be glad to let you borrow. Maybe if you spent some time watching those films that our beloved President gave you, you would have less time for this kind of fiasco and perversion of justice.
Really sir, this type of behavior is not very cricket or old school tie, what? Quite!
Ordinary American on August 22, 2009 at 9:01 AM
Britain releases a Muslim terrorist, we elect a Muslim terrorist sympathizer, it’s all good.
Jeff from WI on August 22, 2009 at 9:04 AM
Jeff from WI on August 22, 2009 at 9:04 AM
….we elect a
Muslimeconomic terroristsympathizer, it’s all goodFIFY
Right-brained on August 22, 2009 at 9:07 AM
A once great civilization that gave us Shakespeare, Marlowe, Churchill, and, yes, Monty Python’s Flying Circus.
How hath the mighty fallen.
SagebrushPuppet on August 22, 2009 at 9:07 AM
I left out Margaret Thatcher. How could I forget her?
SagebrushPuppet on August 22, 2009 at 9:11 AM
Well that of course is also true, but I find it a bit ironic that Americans are upset about this, but have no problem electing a man for President, that proudly announced the support of HAMMAS on his official website.
Jeff from WI on August 22, 2009 at 9:35 AM
Dear Ed: Thanks for your work on this important topic. But this release still makes me so angry that I can’t really post about it without going on a rant. And the business connection makes it even worse. So I have to stop typing now.
Loxodonta on August 22, 2009 at 9:38 AM
Remember when Bush was ordered by the Saudis to release whoever they wanted for their terror cure of cash and big screen TVs? The west dances to the tune of the oil ticks. Don’t be hard on Britain. They are cowards like the rest of us.
BL@KBIRD on August 22, 2009 at 9:40 AM
this is a UK snafu. Hill has been trying for months to stop this from happening:
This was a business deal for Brown, oeriod,. And it looks like Blair laid the groundwork:
ginaswo on August 22, 2009 at 9:41 AM
Lets not for get that the British civilization gave us the USA (as much as the British government protested at the time).
Count to 10 on August 22, 2009 at 9:45 AM
Of course they did! The Libyans have been quite up front about this deal for some time. The UK did plenty of horse trading in the Lockerbie affaire’– but not just the UK. This was done across the board in the EU.
The “compassionate release” lie was a thin veil for the real quid pro quo. The Lockerbie bomber’s release is one of several payments on Kaddafi’s terrorist extortion demands that secured release of (what Saif Ghadafi admitted) were brutally prison raped and tortured EU nurse hostages.
This bald-faced hostage extortion payoff does not bode well for Iran’s three American hostages. Westerners should expect more of this old school hostage extortion game in the future… because it clearly works.
/once again, terrorism pays… handsomely
Terp Mole on August 22, 2009 at 9:46 AM
So let’s add up some of Kaddafi’s extortion booty for brutally prison raping EU nurses;
EU $400 million (includes Bulgaria’s $57M ransom)
French nuclear deal (+ military hardware)
EU free trade (+ political normalization)
Brand new US Ambassador + date w/ Condi
An historic handshake and UN podium w/ Obama for Ramadan
Lockerbie bomber’s release… PRICELESS
[Kaddafi learned the rehabilitation jig well under the expert tutelage of that old "necklassing" terrorist thug, Nelson Mandela.]
/Kaddafi delenda est
Terp Mole on August 22, 2009 at 9:52 AM
Asleep or part of the negotiations (with plausible deniability)?
The Powerline link says:
The AFP article is dated Apr 20, 2009 not February 2009.
For the record, Gordon Brown visited Obama March 3, 2009. Obama visited Brown on April 1, 2009 – both of which predated the release of the trial balloon article.
Heck, al-Megrahi’s release could be part of his efforts for a “new beginning between America and the Muslim World”. Coincidentally, al-Megrahi was released to Libya the same day Barry issued a Happy Ramadan videogram while expressing faux-outrage over al-Megrahi’s release.
BTW, Barry makes a big deal out of fasting and says:
Ask yourself if The Messiah has fasted and given up Wagyu steaks. Ask yourself whether he extolled the virtues of fasting on Good Friday. Ask yourself whether or not highlighting fasting [during the month of Ramadan, no less] is an appropriate role for the President of the United States.
Buy Danish on August 22, 2009 at 9:52 AM
They’ve already started, here and in Scotland.
unclesmrgol on August 22, 2009 at 9:53 AM
Hmmmmmm. Didn’t the POTUS just do a two billion dollar oil deal with Brazil(Soros)? All of this within a couple of days of each other. What is all of this nonsense that we just have to go green if we are going to be digging for oil. I guess we have a lot more of it to dig up before the well goes dry. That stupid Sarah Palin must have been right. She is everywhere and she is right! We must become oil independent.
BetseyRoss on August 22, 2009 at 9:57 AM
Prepare to have your cake frosted. Kaddafi’s victory dance in New York City next month. Naturally, Kaddafi will earn a standing ovation in New York next month at the Parliament of Thugs.
Judging from Obama’s willingness to shake hands with Kaddafi, I expect they’ll exchange big wet UN smooches– full on the mouth.
Terp Mole on August 22, 2009 at 10:02 AM
Releasing this guy was evil. Don’t expect good results from evil actions.
Mojave Mark on August 22, 2009 at 10:03 AM
Is it really too much too ask that our Justice Department serve 187 arrest warrants when Kaddafi steps off his plane in New York next month?
What a grotesque irony that Kaddafi will arrive at JFK Intn’l– the Christmas 1988 destination of Clipper Maid of the Seas.
Terp Mole on August 22, 2009 at 10:10 AM
Correction: 189 American innocents
Terp Mole on August 22, 2009 at 10:14 AM
I hope the oil in this deal is as slick as Browns excuses. Seems like a lot of sludge in this.
capejasmine on August 22, 2009 at 10:28 AM
A rotisserie was installed there a long time ago.
Disturb the Universe on August 22, 2009 at 10:33 AM
A) follow the money and B) did the lawsuit by the Lockerbie victims ever get paid out, ie, follow the money.
Robert17 on August 22, 2009 at 10:50 AM
Remember, today is the first day of Ramadan! The most important holiday for humanity! Be sure to be especially respectful of Islam during this sacred time for the world. Be gracious to your Muslim fellow citizens by not eating in front of them or mentioning non Muslim things in their presence during this holy time for the worlds most conservative religious people. Remember, Islam gave the world all that is of value.
BL@KBIRD on August 22, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Yessiree, another stunning victory for UK style health care.
Can’t wait to see how it works here.
Amendment X on August 22, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Your conflation of Kaddafi’s hostage extortion scheme with the Lockerbie victim’s compensation is asshatted.
It merely repeats Saif Kaddafi’s sick public taunts that the victims families (widows, orphans, aging parents) were “greedy.”
Haven’t they suffered enough?
Terp Mole on August 22, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Incompetence….
ladyingray on August 22, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Simple answer?
Yes.
Shame on the Scots. All those great warriors and poets and scientists and thinkers must be achieving light speed with their spinning.
Mommynator on August 22, 2009 at 11:20 AM
It is hard to believe that President Lovebama and his handler-in chief, George Soros were not involved in this terrotist -for oil scheme.
Wonder if Libya will get its neucs back from us as part of the deal.
Amazed on August 22, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Can I say “yes, without a doubt” to the headline question?
Europe has been trading open borders on immigration from Muslim countries for decades in exchange for oil. They are committing cultural suicide to keep the oil flowing.
DerKrieger on August 22, 2009 at 11:24 AM
Well, wonder no more… that too was part of the extortion payoff in Kaddafi’s hostage extortion scheme.
The payoff afforded Sarkozy’s missus an heroic photo-op jetting home with Kaddafi’s brutally raped and tortured EU nurse hostages.
/oh yes, terrorism pays… handsomely
Terp Mole on August 22, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Is this anything “new”? Just more of that “smart diplomacy”.
And it’s not going to go away. Just wait until Mohmet dies and gets a ‘state funeral’.
GarandFan on August 22, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Wouldn’t that involve removing Kaddafi’s member from Obama’s butt, we see how he bends over for Saudi kings.
UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST on August 22, 2009 at 11:49 AM
We trade terrorists for oil…
We fund oil rigs in Brazil…
We shake hands with dictators.
But we don’t drill in Alaska?
WHY, MR.O? WHY?
PattyJ on August 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM
Obama’s Blackberry
You have one missed call at 3:01 am
The Race Card on August 22, 2009 at 12:29 PM
This whole situation is just wrong on so many levels, but what really frosts my b@lls is how the msm and the same liberals who demand we close Gitmo and release the terrorists imprisoned there are ‘outraged’ over this.
mrt721 on August 22, 2009 at 12:31 PM
Hmmmmm.
1. I’m pretty pissed off about this. But this is par for the course with Europeans. This isn’t the first time Americans have been screwed over by Europeans.
2. Anybody remember Arnold Klinghoffer? The mastermind behind the Achille Lauro piracy and the murder of Arnold Klinghoffer was tried, at the insistence of the Italian government, in Italy. He was given a 30 year sentence, served about a month and then was given a weekend furlough!
That’s right. A terrorist murdered an American and the Italians just let him walk out on a 30 year sentence.
3. Bomb Lybia again? No offense but we can’t afford that again. Why? Because we paid millions of dollars to Lybia in compensation for that bombing.
WTF!? Google it. Link: Libya to receive reparations for Reagan air strike
So while bombing Lybia may be a way to “vent the spleen” if we end up having to pay to compensate Lybia it doesn’t seem to be a winning strategy.
Just once, ONCE!, I’d like for America to blow someone up =without= having to pay money to compensate someone for it.
memomachine on August 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Good Article over at PJ Media
What Was Really Behind the Lockerbie Bomber’s Release?
elduende on August 22, 2009 at 12:49 PM
The Scottish government should be ashamed.
But if the British Government had anything to do with this, especially with oil contracts, heads should roll. That might be the one thing that could bring the Brown government (and Labor) out for good.
newton on August 22, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Their nitwit politicians are just like our nitwit politicians. They won’t develop their own energy supplies but rather wait for the technology fairies to bring giant green pinwheels to harness the winds. Meanwhile something has to keep the lights on so they make obscene deals with obscene gangster regimes.
dhimwit on August 22, 2009 at 1:08 PM
BL@KBIRD –
I’ll share a little laugh so bear with me – I lived in Tripoli Libya as a kid from ’64 – ’68. Even in our Oil Company funded American school we had a semester of Arabic and a semester of Libyan History each year (4th – 7thg grades while I was there). So all us Oil patch kids learned quite a bit about the middle east in General and Libya / Islam in particular.
Here in Houston I recently entered a local convenience store – and saw not one person in the place – not even behind the counter! Feeling like I’d walked into an old Twilight zone episode I looked all over that store for anyone – I’d given up and was walking out when I noticed the clerk kneeling on a prayer rug behind the counter (of course why I didn’t see him before). He finally noticed me and begrudgingly arose to help me make my purchase. He about fainted when I commenced to correcting the direction he was facing while praying. The guy was facing northeast roughly towards NY City!
I advised him he should be facing slightly south of due EAST, paid for my stuff, and left him agape at an old Texan Biker teaching him his own cultural info………..HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Katfish on August 22, 2009 at 1:37 PM
MEMO WE SMELL WHATCHA STEPPIN IN PAHDNAH!
Katfish on August 22, 2009 at 1:39 PM
Imho, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmet al-Megrahi should meet a more sudden death than with his prostate cancer…one delivered from 50,000ft via the B-2 with a JDAM.
McBaine on August 22, 2009 at 2:05 PM
Michael Yon’s reporting with the 2 Rifles company in Afghanistan is the only good news I’ve heard involving the UK in several years.
They get a little sympathy from me because they’ve been our supporters in the GWOT, and because The One is a douche to them, but this story is sick.
Johnson on August 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM
From the “trial balloon” link dated April 20th:
Back in April he had only a few weeks to live, it’s now late August and yet somehow he’s still alive.
I feel a miraculous recovery in the works or perhaps a very quick death with no one able to see the body and then Megrahi and his entire family will disappear from public view to an undisclosed location.
RJL on August 22, 2009 at 2:46 PM
One the face of it this looks like an absolute disgrace.
Not hard to believe the British government would do this though given their shameful surrender to the IRA and desire to negotiate with the ‘moderate’ elements of the Taliban.
Anders on August 22, 2009 at 8:11 PM
The IRA lost in Northern Ireland and show little enthusiasm for a second round with their countrymen. It appears British diplomacy had a role in their disarmament programme. The Taliban are another story.
While one may empathize with the idea of compassion for the dying, the consequences of this decision – giving Ghadaffi’s purported hundreds of supporters and the worst of the Arab world a “victory” – are not commensurate with that principle.
I supported the release of this thug on the condition that he was on his last legs, that it would improve relations with a regime that I despise but has moderated its behaviour towards the outside world, and that it would be accompanied by little fanfare. I should have known they would pull a Kuntar.
Grunchy Cranola on August 22, 2009 at 8:56 PM
Churchill, we need you more than ever… or at least the Brits do.
Yakko77 on August 23, 2009 at 1:32 AM
Down the memory hole: Lockerbie bomber received exquisite care inside
Scottish jailThe Kaddafi cafe while the grand wizard of rehabilated terrorists Nelson Mandela lobbied tirelessly for release.Kaddafi even bought Megrahi’s wife and children an estate in Glasgow.
/“compassionate release” is a rancid lie
Terp Mole on August 23, 2009 at 8:30 AM
The sad irony (lost on Brits) is that Kaddafi was the IRA. Kaddafi financed, supported, trained and armed the IRA for decades.
Up to 6,000 innocents were killed or injured with Libyan supplied guns and explosives. And many IRA bombs employed the same Semtex that destroyed Clipper Maid of the Seas.
IRA victims still seek to hold Kaddafi accountable for those countless bloody atrocities.
Kaddafi’s IRA proxies might still be in business if not for the tireless efforts of the Victims of Pan Am 103 to sanction and isolate Libya.
/and no good deed goes unpunished
Terp Mole on August 23, 2009 at 8:57 AM
Here we see a perfect example of the dysfunctional moral compass that flew Lockerbie justice into ruin.
The
oil“improved relations” secured by releasing this thug is (apparently) worth the price of inflicting this awful agony– on victims’ widows, orphans and aging parents– if only “accompanied by little fanfare.”The shame of a cheering Libya mob– not the agony WE inflicted upon the victims’ loved ones– is all many find objectionable.
That appalling nihilistic animus is precisely what motivated this grotesque Faustian bargain.
/nemo me impune lacessit… Kaddafi delenda est
Terp Mole on August 23, 2009 at 9:26 AM
linky repair
/Nemo me impune lacessit… Kaddafi delenda est
Terp Mole on August 23, 2009 at 9:46 AM
Why does this remind me of an episode from “Yes, Prime Minister”? That time I think it had something to do with aircraft orders.
Fred 2 on August 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM
The sad irony (lost on Brits) is that Kaddafi was the IRA.
–Pretty sure the IRA was the IRA (just ask the Kennedys).
But now that you bring it up, the link you cited indicates that Republican paramilitaries obtained weapons from Europe, Libya, and, most importantly, the US.
The “Armalite and ballot box strategy” of the 80s and 90s had little to do with Muammar Ghadaffi or the victims of PA103 – mostly because he didn’t usually deal in US arms. Significantly, large elements of the IRA moved away from violence (the “Armalite”) as a political tool at the signing of the Anglo-Irish Agreement, which was a stepping stone to the (ongoing) Good Friday Agreement.
Here we see a perfect example of the dysfunctional moral compass that flew Lockerbie justice into ruin.
–Well thanks. If you’re done preaching, it might have been easier to shoot him. But clearly that option wasn’t on the table. Nor, apparently, is the Carthaginian scenario you’ve hinted at.
The oil “improved relations” secured by releasing this thug is (apparently) worth the price of inflicting this awful agony…
–Are you saying oil isn’t worth blood? Maybe I’m the only one who found that slogan insulting for the wrong reasons.
That release might be worth it if it helps influence a Libyan regime (Ghadaffi or not) to rejectterrorism as a central plank of its foreign policy.
not the agony WE inflicted upon the victims’ loved ones…
–Sending him to die elsewhere won’t bring their families back.
Grunchy Cranola on August 23, 2009 at 5:44 PM
Not according to the IRA victims who (yes) still hold Kaddafi responsible for the IRA’s bloody atrocities. They can no longer afford to ignore the kabuki theatre of Libyan state-sponsorship.
And your moronic insinuation that ILLICIT arms shipments are (somehow) morally equivalent to Kaddafi’s LICIT Libyan state-sponsorship shows very weak reasoning skills.
No. I wondered how creepy you are for maintaining “improved relations” (secured by releasing this thug) are worth the price of inflicting this awful agony– on victims’ widows, orphans and aging parents– if only “accompanied by little fanfare.” Because clearly, their suffering doesn’t concern you.
Gee, thanks for reminding folks– as if that trite remark justifies Megrahi’s release. MacAskill’s appeasement conceit (cheapening the value of innocent blood) will only invite more terrorism against other families– as surely as rewarding Kaddafi will only embolden his jihadist proteges, imitators and competitors.
Grade: F
/dismissed
Terp Mole on August 23, 2009 at 6:52 PM
It’s simply astounding. British manhood is no more. I never thought I’d live to see it, but the evidence is irrefutable. Everything that Churchill said about the English character is now stone cold myth. I suppose we should open our shores to their survivors, but what would we get out of it?
argos on August 23, 2009 at 11:09 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »