We learned a long time ago the ACLU didn’t truly believe in the right to privacy except when it was convenient for its agenda. When it was convenient for fundraising, privacy went out the window. Now we learn that as long as it fits the agenda of end…

Here’s their problem in this case. They are playing around with some very serious people who went halfway around the globe to walk into a God forsaken desert in order to hunt down and kill the men who would murder our own people. They are committed to protecting all citizens, including their own families.

I know and have worked with some of them, and when I say they are very serious people, I mean they are VERY serious people who don’t play well with others. If one of their family members gets even a scratch because those idiot lawyers “outed” them, I wouldn’t bet that lawyer would make it to the weekend. This is especially so if it was discovered the lawyer crossed the line and aided the criminals.

When I was working in an anti crime task force we ran into criminals threatening our people. We reached an “understanding” with them quickly and it stopped. The rule was simple, keep it in court. If you get away we’ll get you next time, if you go to jail, it was meant to be. If you show up at our homes threatening our families, then all bets are off. One time we thought a lawyer was passing personal information belonging to witnesses and the cops to his clients, there was an “understanding” met there also.

The lawyers who are doing this think they can because, well they are lawyers and they have all this paperwork that says they can. We’ve long passed the point where the argument is whether or not terrorists have rights and now moved to how much can we harass those we asked to serve.

There’s a saying that it is often best to let sleeping dogs lie, and if I could offer some advice it would be this, “A wise man would resist the urge to kick it.” For men and women who stood in that God forsaken desert really don’t care about what a lawyer thinks, and frankly one or two less wouldn’t mean nothing to them.

I’m serious here folks – this is ridiculous.

Eric Holder will let ‘em off – wanna bet?

…………… YES!!!

ACLU, Gitmo lawyers exposed CIA agent identities to terrorists
The ACLU and defense attorneys for detainees at Guantanamo Bay
surveilled and took pictures of CIA agents and then showed the photos
to terrorists at Gitmo. The Department of Justice……

Publish the ACLU lawyers names.

I wonder if the same people making that argument … will remain consistent in this

If people were consistent in their politics, there’d be no such thing as the Democratic Party. (There’d be no such thing as the Republican Party either, but that’s another issue for another thread.)

So what is a fitting punishment???

Waterboard them until they pass out. Let them regain consciousness long enough to see they are falling out of a burning skyscraper.

JonR on August 21, 2009 at 4:14 PM

I agree that this needs to be shoved right back into their faces. Town hall meetings should all now include at least one sign demanding a trial for the ACLU.

I call upon President Obama to appoint Patrick Fitzgerald as special prosecutor to investigate and prosecute whatever crimes may have resulted from the actions of the ACLU.

http://community.livejournal.com/black_avenger_1/19849.html

The left has become thoroughly sickening. This is traitorous.

“The Justice Department recently questioned military defense attorneys…”

That would be Eric Holder’s Justice Department, the one that refused to prosecute the New Black Panther Party for blatant voter intimidation in Philadelphia. The one that wants to investigate and prosecute CIA analysts for torture. How much do you want to bet that they do nothing about this case.

xrayiiis on August 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM

Agreed! This won’t go far. And for all the rhetoric we hear from the left about liberties, freedoms, and assaults on those freedoms….I’m betting none of them will see the hypocrisy in this either.