Greenpeace: Yeah, we misled, but we needed the emotionalism!

posted at 8:47 am on August 20, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Phelim McAleer, the co-director of Not Evil, Just Wrong, catches the BBC in an act of journalism when interviewing Greenpeace leader Gerd Leipold. The activist organization insisted in a July 15th press release that all of the Arctic ice would disappear by 2030, a claim which reporter Stephen Sackur finds ridiculous — and for good reason. Watch Leipold backpedal in this 98-second clip from the interview (full interview here):

The BBC, later in the interview, gets to the heart of Greenpeace’s agenda:

Although he admitted Greenpeace had released inaccurate but alarming information, Leipold defended the organization’s practice of “emotionalizing issues” in order to bring the public around to its way of thinking and alter public opinion.

Leipold said later in the BBC interview that there is an urgent need for the suppression of economic growth in the United States and around the world. He said annual growth rates of 3 percent to 8 percent cannot continue without serious consequences for the climate.

“We will definitely have to move to a different concept of growth. … The lifestyle of the rich in the world is not a sustainable model,” Leipold said. “If you take the lifestyle, its cost on the environment, and you multiply it with the billions of people and an increasing world population, you come up with numbers which are truly scary.”

The global-warming movement isn’t really about climate. It’s about stunting the economic growth of the West. That’s why groups like Greenpeace like to “emotionalize” rather than conduct and promote actual science. They’re interested in specific outcomes, not scientific truth, and that specific outcome is statist control over energy production and economic activity to redistribute wealth.

Be sure to watch my interview with Phelim and his co-director and wife Ann McElhinney from last weekend, and to participate in the worldwide premier of Not Evil, Just Wrong.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Didn’t greenpeace jump the shark years ago?

cannonball on August 20, 2009 at 8:50 AM

Leipold defended the organization’s practice of “emotionalizing issues” in order to bring the public around to its way of thinking and alter public opinion

So I’m not tasting any dolphin in my canned tuna ???

Jerome Horwitz on August 20, 2009 at 8:51 AM

The global-warming movement isn’t really about climate. It’s about stunting the economic growth of the West.

Just like Healthcare Reform. It’s all about control. Our own people in alliance with the America is Evil crowd.

kingsjester on August 20, 2009 at 8:51 AM

Imagning this conversation:

“If you take the lifestyle, its cost on the environment, and you multiply it with the billions of people and an increasing world population, you come up with numbers which are truly scary.”

“And what are these numbers?”

“I don’t know, but they’re truly scary. They might even go to eleven.”

apostic on August 20, 2009 at 8:52 AM

Liars…

Khun Joe on August 20, 2009 at 8:52 AM

Although he admitted Greenpeace had released inaccurate but alarming information, Leipold defended the organization’s practice of “emotionalizing issues” in order to bring the public around to its way of thinking and alter public opinion.

“Damn, I wish I’d have thought of that”…..Dan Rather

Rovin on August 20, 2009 at 8:53 AM

Save the Planet….Kill the Humans!

ny59giants on August 20, 2009 at 8:53 AM

“We will definitely have to move to a different concept of growth.

Like negative growth, or what?

BadgerHawk on August 20, 2009 at 8:53 AM

What about the whales? That, TOO? Say it ain’t so, Gerd.

Jerk.

genso on August 20, 2009 at 8:54 AM

Didn’t greenpeace jump the shark years ago?

cannonball on August 20, 2009 at 8:50 AM

The whale shark, maybe…

kiltedscotsman5 on August 20, 2009 at 8:54 AM

I can’t believe we’re to question their spokescutie Leonardo DiCaprio. He did grad-jee-ate the eighth grade.

Marcus on August 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM

Prologue to Jurassic Park

bears repeating

You think man can destroy the planet? What intoxicating vanity. Let me tell you about our planet. Earth is four-and-a-half-billion-years-old. There’s been life on it for nearly that long, 3.8 billion years. Bacteria first; later the first multicellular life, then the first complex creatures in the sea, on the land. Then finally the great sweeping ages of animals, the amphibians, the dinosaurs, at last the mammals, each one enduring millions on millions of years, great dynasties of creatures rising, flourishing, dying away — all this against a background of continuous and violent upheaval. Mountain ranges thrust up, eroded away, cometary impacts, volcano eruptions, oceans rising and falling, whole continents moving, an endless, constant, violent change, colliding, buckling to make mountains over millions of years. Earth has survived everything in its time. It will certainly survive us. If all the nuclear weapons in the world went off at once and all the plants, all the animals died and the earth was sizzling hot for a hundred thousand years, life would survive, somewhere: under the soil, frozen in Arctic ice. Sooner or later, when the planet was no longer inhospitable, life would spread again. The evolutionary process would begin again. It might take a few billion years for life to regain its present variety. Of course, it would be very different from what it is now, but the earth would survive our folly, only we would not. If the ozone layer gets thinner, ultraviolet radiation sears the earth, so what? Ultraviolet radiation is good for life. It’s powerful energy. It promotes mutation, change. Many forms of life will thrive with more UV radiation. Many others will die out. Do you think this is the first time that’s happened? Think about oxygen. Necessary for life now, but oxygen is actually a metabolic poison, a corrosive glass, like fluorine. When oxygen was first produced as a waste product by certain plant cells some three billion years ago, it created a crisis for all other life on earth. Those plants were polluting the environment, exhaling a lethal gas. Earth eventually had an atmosphere incompatible with life. Nevertheless, life on earth took care of itself. In the thinking of the human being a hundred years is a long time. A hundred years ago we didn’t have cars, airplanes, computers or vaccines. It was a whole different world, but to the earth, a hundred years is nothing. A million years is nothing. This planet lives and breathes on a much vaster scale. We can’t imagine its slow and powerful rhythms, and we haven’t got the humility to try. We’ve been residents here for the blink of an eye. If we’re gone tomorrow, the earth will not miss us.

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM

Greenpeace Redface

jgapinoy on August 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM

Scare tactics?

The Brits are too nice. This is just straight up lying.

xax on August 20, 2009 at 8:56 AM

The global-warming movement isn’t really about climate. It’s about stunting the economic growth of the West. That’s why groups like Greenpeace like to “emotionalize” rather than conduct and promote actual science. They’re interested in specific outcomes, not scientific truth, and that specific outcome is statist control over energy production and economic activity to redistribute wealth.

The global warming movement is a religion and is being foisted upon us as shown by this interview. They appeal to emotion and try to drum up faith in their movement. They have their ministers–”green czars” and activists like this gentlemen. They call “heresy” on skeptics who try to use reason, logic and empiricism to dispute their claims–and are largely successful in doing so. They have their churches of “green buildings” and their god “Earth” and “the environment” as well as their satan which is the heretics, consumers and polluters who may drive cars with V-8s. Moreover, we are being forced to pay our tithes for carbon taxes and cap and trade energy taxes in order to fund the work of the “new church.” Does this sound familiar?

The left crows about separation of church and state when someone posts the Ten Commandments or utters a prayer in school. That’s surely small ‘taters when put into context with the environmental statists—THIS movement is why we have the separation of church and state.

ted c on August 20, 2009 at 8:57 AM

The only thing shocking here is the admission of the truth that we conservatives have been articulating for years.

search4truth on August 20, 2009 at 8:57 AM

EMOTIONS RULE!

Keef Overbite on August 20, 2009 at 8:57 AM

Jeez, when the communists at the Beeb bust you, how pathetic is that?

ebrown2 on August 20, 2009 at 8:57 AM

Keef Overbite on August 20, 2009 at 8:57 AM

great tag name!

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 8:59 AM

I’ve always considered Greenpeace to be a half-step from being a terrorist organization anyway so this doesn’t surprise me.

Oh, and the BBC defending blatant lies? Par for the course with them.

Browncoatone on August 20, 2009 at 8:59 AM

Greenpeace: Yeah, we misled, but we needed the emotionalism!

The democrats are suing Greenpeace for stealing their slogan.

right2bright on August 20, 2009 at 9:00 AM

The Left is so convinced of its correctness, that the ends justify the means. Lying, demagoguery, slander, demonizing, suppression of other voices, are all ok if they result in the Lefty goal of controlling society. Thus we end up with the gulags, the Cultural Revolution and Auschwitz.

rbj on August 20, 2009 at 9:00 AM

China is the fastest-growing economy in the world right now. And there are 1.2 billion Chinese. Would this nutcase advocate stunting their economy and ‘removing’ 700 million of them to save the planet? Or do his ideas(?)involve only the US, Britain, and other Western nations?

Chucklenuts fascist…

Liam on August 20, 2009 at 9:00 AM

You think man can destroy the planet? What intoxicating vanity… We can’t imagine its slow and powerful rhythms, and we haven’t got the humility to try.

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM

Thank you. That does bear repeating.

xax on August 20, 2009 at 9:01 AM

I’ve always considered Greenpeace to be a half-step from being a terrorist organization anyway so this doesn’t surprise me.

Oh, and the BBC defending blatant lies? Par for the course with them.

Browncoatone on August 20, 2009 at 8:59 AM

I fully consider them to be economic terrorists.

ICBM on August 20, 2009 at 9:01 AM

If the greens really want the world to live a simpler life, how about they set an example by abandoning all the trappings of the “rich” that they despise. Drop the cell phones, and the mass-produced clothes, and the car, and the flying, and the house.

hawksruleva on August 20, 2009 at 9:02 AM

Thank you. That does bear repeating.

xax on August 20, 2009 at 9:01 AM

I mean

It’s not that I don’t believe in conservation and reducing our impact. I believe we should try to do that, but as individuals. We should encourage one another to do the right thing, but we should not be coerced into it by government.

In the end, though, their argument is weak because they talk of “killing the planet.” There is no “killing the planet.” If you want to may hay about killing ourselves, then perhaps you’ll have an ear from me.

But we won’t kill the planet.

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 9:03 AM

If the greens really want the world to live a simpler life, how about they set an example by abandoning all the trappings of the “rich” that they despise. Drop the cell phones, and the mass-produced clothes, and the car, and the flying, and the house.

hawksruleva on August 20, 2009 at 9:02 AM

Oh no no no…..THEY won’t give up the stuff you mentioned…it’s for the rest of us to sacrifice. Everyone is equal, but they are more equal.

search4truth on August 20, 2009 at 9:04 AM

may hay should read
make hay

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 9:04 AM

I fully consider them to be economic terrorists.

ICBM on August 20, 2009 at 9:01 AM

All I can say is the French had the right idea when they took out the Rainbow Warrior.

highhopes on August 20, 2009 at 9:04 AM

Awesome post Ed. People like Leipold, Gore and even the IPCC do the legitimate climate science a disservice.

toliver on August 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM

Kill the Babies… Save the Whales!
Smoke… but don’t inhale. Lying Hypocrites, every one of them. This Cold War between those on the Right, and those on the… Wrong Side, is reaching a boiling point that neither side can control.

ronnyraygun on August 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM

Leipold said later in the BBC interview that there is an urgent need for the suppression of economic growth in the United States and around the world. He said annual growth rates of 3 percent to 8 percent cannot continue without serious consequences for the climate.

Well, they should be particularly happy about the recession, and the latest job numbers.

ICBM on August 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM

Nothing different from the “higher truths” defense people like Michael Moore use in their crusades. In their minds, it’s OK to lie to get you to your goal, because that goal is more important than the truth.

jon1979 on August 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM

According to your average liberal, if your goal is noble, then any means to acheive it is justified.

Of course the liberal reserves the right to decide which goals are noble, and which aren’t.

Conversely, if your opponents goal isn’t noble (as defined by the liberal, of course), then any means to oppose it are justified as well.

MarkTheGreat on August 20, 2009 at 9:06 AM

Emotionalist!

surrounded on August 20, 2009 at 9:07 AM

I have said a long time if these animal-rights and global-warming types want to make the world a better place, they should all go up north and make sure polar bears are getting enough nutrition.

Wasn’t it Greenpeace that killed all those baby seals in the 70s to make a point?

Liam on August 20, 2009 at 9:10 AM

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM

Yes…thanks for the good reminder. I would recommend all these globull warming/climate change morons watch How the Earth was Made on History Channel.

becki51758 on August 20, 2009 at 9:11 AM

Politics has become primarily theater. Dictated by the 24hr news cycle. That’s why celebrities/actors are good at it and feel the need to participate.

NickelAndDime on August 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM

I no longer know how to feign shock.

txag92 on August 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM

Fake, but accurate. Isn’t that how it is supposed to be? Just ask Dan Rather.

Vashta.Nerada on August 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 9:03 AM

Might I add to what I said before:

These people do think we will “kill the planet.” They are wrong.

I was driving home yesterday evening from the ocean, and as I made my way home on a two lane highway, I noticed grass and weed starting to make progress into the shoulder of the road. Life finds a way. We can take our mixtures and pave roads, but eventually, nature will usurp our efforts. So for all the doomsdaying the left throws out there, the basis of their arguments don’t hold water.

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM

The lifestyle of the rich in the world is not a sustainable model,” Leipold said.

Except, of course, for the intelligentsia.

Vashta.Nerada on August 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM

Prologue to Jurassic Park

bears repeating

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM

This reminds me: Must read State of Fear someday…

apostic on August 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM

Liar, liar your north and south pole is on fire.

Or maybe not!

SouthernGent on August 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM

“What matters is the sentiment, not actual fact. What is truth, anyway? Is it not relative? What’s true for you might not be true for me? What makes your truth any more truthful than my truth?”

Says the postmodern liberal.

Mommypundit on August 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM

Life does find a way.

ladyingray on August 20, 2009 at 9:15 AM

Emotionalize: Definition: A WHOPPER OF A LIE

Jeff from WI on August 20, 2009 at 9:16 AM

This is typical “Ed Morrissey”. Stating that greenpeace “Misled”. Can’t we simply call it what it is? An outright, open lie?

Anyway, great work here Ed getting this info out to us. Credit where credit is due. DD

Darvin Dowdy on August 20, 2009 at 9:17 AM

Didn’t greenpeace jump the shark years ago?

cannonball on August 20, 2009 at 8:50 AM

And the shark was up to the task.

WashJeff on August 20, 2009 at 9:17 AM

So I’m not tasting any dolphin in my canned tuna ???

Jerome Horwitz on August 20, 2009 at 8:51 AM

Yeah well I never understood that whole dolphin/tuna zero-sum game anyway. Everybody was always on a rant about the dolphins getting caught in nets.

WHAT ABOUT THE TUNA’S RIGHTS HUH? Tuna have feelings too! *munches tuna sandwich with choked sob*

inviolet on August 20, 2009 at 9:17 AM

I am sick and tired of the indoctrination of our children. You would not believe the things my kids come home preaching. Remember Al Gore telling the kids to ignore their parents? I’m pretty laid back, but I’d like to smack that guy around a little bit.

TXMomof3 on August 20, 2009 at 9:20 AM

Just like Healthcare Reform. It’s all about control. Our own people in alliance with the America is Evil crowd.

[kingsjester on August 20, 2009 at 8:51 AM]

Just like granting billions to Brazil to develop oil and killing oil development in the US, the added side benefit of helping Soros recoup the $35M political contribution he “invested” in teaming up with Dems to use taxpayers money to buy voters in NY.

Dusty on August 20, 2009 at 9:20 AM

So when do “rhetorical flourishes” become the same as yelling fire in a crowded theater?

singlemalt_18 on August 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM

Maybe the libs can work on getting a whale elected for Potus after the current cartoon character’s term runs out? Now that they’ve done Black radical socialist…a blue dog whale might just be the ticket to smash the Western market system. If Biden can pass as someone a heart beat away from the Oval Office, whales who are in general more intelligent should be under the radar for two terms.

Hening on August 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM

These people do think we will “kill the planet.” They are wrong.

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM

This planet can survive ANYTHING we dish out. We may survive it (e.g., shooting off all of the nuke weapons this world has at once), but the planet will.

WashJeff on August 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM

I think that it is interesting that these folks never seem to realize the advancement and environmental improvement to manufacturing. Their theory seems to be that the evil rich who have grown wealthy through the destruction of the environment live in a bubble away from the masses. Industry will continue to improve on waste and other pollution while improving the standard of living for everyone.

Cindy Munford on August 20, 2009 at 9:22 AM

Greenpeace is a name straight out of Orwell.

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on August 20, 2009 at 9:22 AM

If the greens really want the world to live a simpler life, how about they set an example by abandoning all the trappings of the “rich” that they despise. Drop the cell phones, and the mass-produced clothes, and the car, and the flying, and the house.

hawksruleva on August 20, 2009 at 9:02 AM

Don’t forget the boat.

Johan Klaus on August 20, 2009 at 9:22 AM

I’m going to remember that one. Now when people accuse Obamacare supporters as being “fearmongers” (or evil mongers), I can say that’s not at all true! They’re just emotionalizing the issue.

taznar on August 20, 2009 at 9:23 AM

Greenpeace: Yeah, we lied misled, but we needed the emotionalism!

Fixed

johnsteele on August 20, 2009 at 9:23 AM

What is the source of the income of greenpeace? If they stayed at home, would it save the earth?

Johan Klaus on August 20, 2009 at 9:25 AM

TXMomof3 on August 20, 2009 at 9:20 AM

In my son’s senior year of high school, one of the first things his science teacher did was to show Al Gore’s propaganda movie…the teacher said it was “fact”…my son disagreed with him very publically.

The teacher got angry that my son had true facts to dispute his bull.

ladyingray on August 20, 2009 at 9:25 AM

Evil and wrong would be a better title.

DuctTapeMyBrain on August 20, 2009 at 9:26 AM

Wouldn’t it be cheaper and less risky to figure out how to live with climate change than it would be to change the climate? We probably could even profit off it.

pappy on August 20, 2009 at 9:26 AM

These ba$tards are not just about stunting the economic growth of the west. They are about stunting economic growth for everyone. These racist scum have no problem keeping the undeveloped world in poverty and destitution.

Round them up and shoot them for crimes against humanity. And no, that isn’t hyperbole.

PimFortuynsGhost on August 20, 2009 at 9:28 AM

TXMomof3 on August 20, 2009 at 9:20 AM

In my son’s senior year of high school, one of the first things his science teacher did was to show Al Gore’s propaganda movie…the teacher said it was “fact”…my son disagreed with him very publically.

The teacher got angry that my son had true facts to dispute his bull.

ladyingray on August 20, 2009 at 9:25 AM

Excellent…My kids were famous conservative in High School that the teachers all hated too.

Jeff from WI on August 20, 2009 at 9:28 AM

Appeal to emotion, while effective, is the most pathetic of fallacious logic.
This turd got off easy – notice the ‘commenter/journalist’ trying to let him off, as he goes from ‘It will!!!‘ to ‘I don’t check every press release.’

TinMan13 on August 20, 2009 at 9:29 AM

I think that it is interesting that these folks never seem to realize the advancement and environmental improvement to manufacturing.
Cindy Munford on August 20, 2009 at 9:22 AM

Why should they be different than any other special interest group? To listen to the NAACP, Southern governors are still using fire hoses on blacks attempting to enter public schools and lynchings are an everyday experience.

highhopes on August 20, 2009 at 9:29 AM

I am sick and tired of the indoctrination of our children. You would not believe the things my kids come home preaching. Remember Al Gore telling the kids to ignore their parents? I’m pretty laid back, but I’d like to smack that guy around a little bit.

TXMomof3 on August 20, 2009 at 9:20 AM

So many adults believe the tales, too, and refuse to hear when I speak of the science of these matters. I get shouted down and bombarded with questions from several at once, and if I can’t answer all at the same instant, those fools feel somehow vindicated. Worse, when I make a point of fact, they refuse to believe it so again, in their small CO2-filled minds, they’re vindicated.

The whole concept of the scientific method eludes them though it was taught in grade school. Well, at least that’s where I learned it.

Liam on August 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM

Cindy Munford on August 20, 2009 at 9:22 AM

Hence by oft stated theory that radical environmental groups have done more harm to the environment than any other group.

Their knee-jerk reaction is to block any incremental improvement because “its not good enough”. Take cleaner coal-burning electrical plants. They block the construction of these plants everywhere they can because they still burn coal! So 20 years from now, instead of generating much of our electricity from these cleaner, more efficient plants, we’ll still be using the old plants, running 24×7, wasting stacks of money and increasing pollution, because environmentalists wouldn’t allow the building of something better that would have naturally taken over.

taznar on August 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM

pappy on August 20, 2009 at 9:26 AM

Absolutely.

Read either Cool It or The Skeptical Environmentalist by Bjorn Lomborg. This is his premise.

PimFortuynsGhost on August 20, 2009 at 9:31 AM

In Canada, Greenpeace backed Kyoto to the hilt despite revelations that the then-Liberal government exempted Ontario’s auto industry. This not only undercut any efforts to climate change, it exposed Greenpeace as a supporter of corruption. Their credibility, already extremely weak, was further reduced. Good.

KillerKane on August 20, 2009 at 9:31 AM

These ba$tards are not just about stunting the economic growth of the west. They are about stunting economic growth for everyone. These racist scum have no problem keeping the undeveloped world in poverty and destitution.

PimFortuynsGhost on August 20, 2009 at 9:28 AM

It isn’t economic control – it’s population control. They’re Eugenicists.
Do those with ‘special needs’ not take up more resources while contributing little or nothing? To these Sangerists, those individuals are in the way.

TinMan13 on August 20, 2009 at 9:33 AM

Feelings. It is all about feelings with these guys.

Facts? Science? Not so much.

The end of the global warming/climate change scam is upon us…

coldwarrior on August 20, 2009 at 9:34 AM

Only the liberal mind who think it nobel to BS people to get people thinking their way. Only a liberal would be stupid enough to believe them.

Jeff from WI on August 20, 2009 at 9:35 AM

noble

Jeff from WI on August 20, 2009 at 9:35 AM

That formula, “not evil, just wrong,” seems worth noting well, both for its truth and for its usefulness. It takes away the false grandeur of one’s opponents and returns one’s image of them to that of mere human beings. It may hurt recruitment, for one might be tempted to be evil, but not to be just wrong.

But now I have to reconsider such formulas as “the evil empire” and “the axis of evil.”

Kralizec on August 20, 2009 at 9:36 AM

All these lefty causes lie their butts off. I think it is less about advancing their cause and more about bringing the money in to keep them in business and power.

Blake on August 20, 2009 at 9:37 AM

Finally, a breath of fresh air and a whiff of truth from someone whose stock-in-trade is emotionalizing a lie and manipulating your emotions in order to control you.

Spread the word to everyone you know: anyone who believes in man-made global warming has been brainwashed. Any politician who professes a belief in this hoax is intellectually weak, unable to think for themselves, is easily swayed by lies and is therefore unfit for office.

BackwardsBoy on August 20, 2009 at 9:38 AM

taznar on August 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM

It’s maddening.

Cindy Munford on August 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM

It isn’t economic control – it’s population control. They’re Eugenicists.
Do those with ’special needs’ not take up more resources while contributing little or nothing? To these Sangerists, those individuals are in the way.

TinMan13 on August 20, 2009 at 9:33 AM

They would make Hitler proud.

Johan Klaus on August 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM

A lot of people have known this is all crap, almost from day one.
I’m shocked this is printed.

bridgetown on August 20, 2009 at 9:41 AM

Although he admitted Greenpeace had released inaccurate but alarming information, Leipold defended the organization’s practice of “emotionalizing issues” in order to bring the public around to its way of thinking and alter public opinion.

Didn’t Gore admit as much after he sensationalized testimony at a congressional hearing?

CP on August 20, 2009 at 9:44 AM

The most chilling aspect of this is the science and evidence has been out there for decades, moreso in the past five or six years.

The pseudo-science and the politics of it all have cost lives.

It has also cost millions of minds, as the young since the earliest years have been fed this ignorant pap by teachers, professors, and deranged scientists. Walking this back will take more effort over the next decades than trying to walk back Oswald in Dallas.

Hundreds of millions duped. Hundreds of billions of dollars wasted, perhaps trillions lost.

And AlGore? There has got to be a law he can be nailed under. Bet he is shifting over heavy to oil futures.

coldwarrior on August 20, 2009 at 9:46 AM

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM

+10. This is always my answer when one of my MSM-indoctrinated friends or co-workers starts bemoaning how our gas-guzzling clunkers will surely destroy the planet (all the while drinking water out of a plastic bottle that they might or might not recycle, depending on how inconvenienced they’ll be). I agree we have an obligation to be good stewards of the planet while we’re here — it’s just common courtesy — but not at the expense of responsible progress. We are just so insignificant in the life cycle of this planet. We could very well wipe out ourselves and 99.9% of the rest of the life forms on Earth (or a comet or something could do the job for us), but we will never, ever kill it. Life will return; it always does, just as it has countless times before. The Earth will only be destroyed when the Sun finally collapses and sucks it and everything else around it into its void. You’d think these “scientists” would have a better appreciation how, you know, science actually works.

NoLeftTurn on August 20, 2009 at 9:49 AM

I’d like to see McAleer interview Gore!

Star20 on August 20, 2009 at 9:50 AM

It’s all about envy, jealousy, hatred. Nothing else.

OldEnglish on August 20, 2009 at 9:52 AM

Wouldn’t it be cheaper and less risky to figure out how to live with climate change than it would be to change the climate? We probably could even profit off it.

pappy on August 20, 2009 at 9:26 AM

IIRC that was Newt’s position on the issue before the session on the couch.

News2Use on August 20, 2009 at 9:52 AM

Why is it when I exit a highway around poorer communities there is more trash on the side of the exit ramp? I assume these people tend to vote for Democrats. Don’t they care about the environment?

WashJeff on August 20, 2009 at 9:58 AM

Not just liars but DAMN liars.

Yakko77 on August 20, 2009 at 10:00 AM

Environmentalism is a business. These jokers hate the American way of doing things yet they’re doing things the American way: Innovate, sell the product, and make a profit. The way they do it is by taking donations from schlubs who buy their snake oil.

The top people in these groups live like kings, taking high salaries. They’re professional panhandlers, one of whom bought land and sold off the wood of the trees he had chopped down. I forget who did that and what group he controlled, but it was in the news a few years ago.

Gore’s investment firm sells stocks of ‘green’ companies, and Gore makes a profit with each transaction.

Hypocrisy, anyone?

Liam on August 20, 2009 at 10:02 AM

Professor William Ruddiman from the University of Virginia claims that ancient farmers may have started global warming because of slash-and-burn methods. ( Notice the hyperbole.)

Johan Klaus on August 20, 2009 at 10:03 AM

As the old saying “The truth will out” Greenfleece finally gets tired of trying to think up new emotional ads.

MSGTAS on August 20, 2009 at 10:05 AM

Let’s start to save the planet from overheating by neutering all the wacko environmentalists. Then they can’t reproduce more of their hot air spewing kind.

txdoc on August 20, 2009 at 10:05 AM

Gee, I wonder what kind of people would base their politics on emotions and not those pesky facts?

Wingnut Willie on August 20, 2009 at 10:13 AM

Where are all of the Trolls on this one? Why aren’t they here howling out a defense of this guy? Didn’t he just mis-speak? Or maybe we are just misinterpreting his remarks. I want to hear the excuses I mean, the sound reasoning behind this.

Come on Trolls, what have you got to say?

InTheBellyoftheBeast on August 20, 2009 at 10:13 AM

Greenpeace lied? The whole Global Cooling/Warming/Change thing is a ruse to control? Who’dda thunk it? Please tell me how one can change a climate? Can you stop the sun from shining? Can you turn back the tides and ocean currents? Can you stop the rain? Shall we cover the planet with a layer of chicken wire to stop erosion?

Finally, a breath of fresh air and a whiff of truth from someone whose stock-in-trade is emotionalizing a lie and manipulating your emotions in order to control you.

Spread the word to everyone you know: anyone who believes in man-made global warming has been brainwashed. Any politician who professes a belief in this hoax is intellectually weak, unable to think for themselves, is easily swayed by lies and is therefore unfit for office.

BackwardsBoy on August 20, 2009 at 9:38 AM

You said it well……

blatantblue on August 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM

Thank you for taking the time to write this piece….

If I remember correctly the Moon guy from the U.N. said that the World was in imminant danger of collapsing in 4 months, if we didn’t control global change?? The man is off his rocker!! Who is lining his pockets? It all comes down to who can make the most money by insisting that our ‘carbon footprints’ cause soooooooooo much devastation….I ask, when is our very exhalation gonna be taxed???? They tax farmers in Northern Europe for their cows Methane emmissions. Come on people, we breath out carbon dioxide!!!! Fork over the money….I want my piece of the action…. /sarc

Onward Forward and Upward!!

RoxanneH on August 20, 2009 at 10:15 AM

Comment pages: 1 2