Daily Beast: Leon Panetta’s an incompetent moron who’s jeopardizing U.S. security

posted at 9:51 pm on August 19, 2009 by Allahpundit

The Daily Beast is a center-left/RINO news outlet, so for them to kneecap The One this way is nothing short of shocking. So awful that I don’t even know how to excerpt it. Arguably the most damning story to emerge about Obama’s administrative competence since the inauguration.

Remember a few months ago when Panetta wet his pants about some supposed CIA plan to assassinate Al Qaeda leaders that Congress hadn’t been briefed on (but which had been public knowledge since 2002)? Funny thing:

[A]ccording to a half-dozen sources, including several very senior, recently retired CIA officials, clandestine-service officers, and Cabinet-level officials from the Bush administration, the real story is at once more innocent—Panetta was mistaken; no law was broken—and far more troubling: an inexperienced CIA director, unfamiliar with how his vast, complicated agency works, unable to trust senior officials within his own agency, and desperate to keep his hands clean, screwed up.

The Daily Beast has learned that shortly after his electrifying June 24 disclosure, Panetta spoke personally with each of his three predecessors—George Tenet, Porter Goss, and Michael Hayden—and only then realized the mistake he’d made about the program…

Panetta ordered an internal CIA inquiry into the matter, headed by a widely respected senior official. In his private conversations with his three predecessors, Panetta “as much as admitted” to them (in the words of one CIA insider) that he’d misunderstood. Without explicitly apologizing, he assured the men—whom he’d in effect accused of breaking the law—not to worry: The whole thing would quietly go away. He told them that he’d been pre-briefed by the officer conducting the internal inquiry, and that when the report came out it would indeed back them up. It would come swaddled in vague banalities calling for improving communication between the CIA and Congress. And the whole thing would die a quiet death.

But of course it didn’t. The bell couldn’t be unrung…

Panetta’s big mistake has only emboldened those Democrats in Congress who have been pushing to have all CIA debriefings, even the most classified, videotaped, to avoid future ambiguity. As one very former, very senior Bush administration official said to me in annoyance, “You know what? Let’s videotape them all. And when some important covert action gets torpedoed by the those guys on the intelligence committees and then we get hit again, let’s put those tapes up on YouTube for everyone to see who disarmed us. See what they think. It cuts both ways.”

That’s all I’m giving you. To find out about the alleged cover-up, which involves a glorious lie about how the assassination plot was ready to go active even though it never really was, you’ll have to read the whole thing. So egregious is this, in fact, that author Joseph Finder blames this screw-up for the Obama administration’s renewed determination to hold hearings on interrogation policies. Exit quotation: “Not only has Panetta become deeply unpopular within the agency, but, as these recent events demonstrate, Panetta—honorable, decent, savvy—probably wasn’t the best choice after all.”

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

The Daily Beast is a center-left/RINO news outlet

Don’t really read DB, but aren’t they more hawkish than some “news” outlets?

Upstater85 on August 19, 2009 at 9:53 PM

I can’t read it. Just too much bad news in one day. It all gets old.

JellyToast on August 19, 2009 at 9:54 PM

Still not reading DB.

Dead Hand Control on August 19, 2009 at 9:55 PM

The adults are in charge now, just not very competent ones.

jhffmn on August 19, 2009 at 9:55 PM

From the, “and now for something completely obvious” file…

peski on August 19, 2009 at 9:57 PM

President Obama, reasonably, wanted an outsider to run the CIA, someone whose hands, by definition, were clean.

Ya, like that’s ever worked out…

Ozprey on August 19, 2009 at 9:57 PM

When a nookyaler weapon gets smuggled through Baltimore harbor and exploded in an east coast city, Panetta will just say he was mistaken in his belief that it could never happen.

I will continue to say that Ogabe and the dolts he appoints are going to get a lot of innocent people killed before he is driven from office.

Bishop on August 19, 2009 at 9:57 PM

The Greatest Administration EVAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!

So how are all of those FDR,JFK,and Lincoln comparisons going liberals.

You wanted a failed community organizer whose greatest accomplishment was voting ‘present” over 130 times to run the country and this is what you get.

The Obama administration has declared war on business during a recession and declared war on the CIA while we have almost 200,000 Soldiers on the front lines.

Absolute and complete MORONS!!!!

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 10:00 PM

Absolute and complete MORONS!!!!

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 10:00 PM

Eh, well, FDR essentially declared war on businesses too…

Upstater85 on August 19, 2009 at 10:01 PM

Well……….

…….. It’s a good thing that Panetta’s boss will set him straight. Nothing like strong leadership with a clear vision, morale fortitude, and endless resolve.

Seven Percent Solution on August 19, 2009 at 10:01 PM

So the dumb@ss with no experience in the intelligence community didn’t know how things worked within the CIA.

Hmm. Well slap me silly.

fogw on August 19, 2009 at 10:01 PM

I can’t wait to read what regular DB columnist Meghan McCain has to say on this issue.

Probably something about Palin.

Rhinoboy on August 19, 2009 at 10:02 PM

Whats really funny is that the left was freaking wetting its panties over this a few months ago.

The country truly is in the best of hands.

DJ Rick on August 19, 2009 at 10:02 PM

I can’t wait to read what regular DB columnist Meghan McCain has to say on this issue.

Probably something about Palin.

Rhinoboy on August 19, 2009 at 10:02 PM

I thought the Daily Beast was Meghan McCain.

Upstater85 on August 19, 2009 at 10:03 PM

So there was a reason that none of the last three CIA directors had briefed Congress about it: There was nothing to brief.

And yet Nancy Pelosi was treating this like vindication of her lies.

amerpundit on August 19, 2009 at 10:04 PM

I actually read it and I haven’t been to the Daily Beast in a while.

Best quote:

Panetta’s big mistake has only emboldened those Democrats in Congress who have been pushing to have all CIA debriefings, even the most classified, videotaped, to avoid future ambiguity. As one very former, very senior Bush administration official said to me in annoyance, “You know what? Let’s videotape them all. And when some important covert action gets torpedoed by the those guys on the intelligence committees and then we get hit again, let’s put those tapes up on YouTube for everyone to see who disarmed us. See what they think. It cuts both ways.

INC on August 19, 2009 at 10:04 PM

probably wasn’t the best choice after all.”

were any of oboobi’s choices “the right one” in a word no.

SHARPTOOTH on August 19, 2009 at 10:04 PM

I think this applies.

mechkiller_k on August 19, 2009 at 10:04 PM

Another great choice!

Keef Overbite on August 19, 2009 at 10:05 PM

“Incompetent Moron” describes everyone in Obama’s administration including Dear Leader itself.

Panetta was a moron in the Clinton administration and he sure has not gotten smarter or better looking.

enoughalready on August 19, 2009 at 10:05 PM

Well, who leaked to the Post that the plan or operation (using that, in this case, loosely) was going to go active?

SteveMG on August 19, 2009 at 10:06 PM

disaster. I like to think Bush killed and captured enough of these guys to ensure our safety for at least a couple of years.

rob verdi on August 19, 2009 at 10:07 PM

Shameful. Panetta should resign.

aikidoka on August 19, 2009 at 10:07 PM

The fact that Panetta most likely did pay his taxes already makes him over qualified for an Obama appointment.

Upstater85 on August 19, 2009 at 10:07 PM

This is gigantic. The only people who could screw up a gift like this are………are………are……..

Republicans.

>sigh<

drjohn on August 19, 2009 at 10:08 PM

Related parody: “Whistleblower Warns That If Congress Isn’t Briefed on Anti-Terrorism Plans Earlier, Such Plans Can’t Be Leaked to Press in Time to Stop Them” http://optoons.blogspot.com/2009/07/whistleblower-warns-that-if-congress.html

Mervis Winter on August 19, 2009 at 10:10 PM

The CIA made it clear early on that they did not want this political hack (with no intelligence experience) running the agency:

Comment: CIA Insiders Issue Political Threats Against Obama, Panetta

January 8, 2009 ·
http://intelligencenews.wordpress.com/2009/01/08/02-32/

Directors it perceives as outsiders, has already “shown signs of refusing to cooperate with the incoming Administration”. This is now becoming clearer, as numerous CIA sources come forward to sharply denounce Panetta’s nomination and, in some cases, even hurtle political threats at the Obama Administration and its nominee. In one such case, a “former intelligence official” speaking to The Washington Post reminded Obama and Panetta that “many of the people Panetta will be expected to lead [at the CIA] would have participated in implementing [torture-based] interrogation polic[ies]“. Another “former senior official” warned Obama and Panetta to “think twice about pledges they make now [about the handling of terrorism detainees] because they may come back to haunt them in the future if some dire circumstances occur”.

All Obama wanted was some yes man to keep the lid on leaks and cover his a$$ for any intelligence mistakes.

Unfortunately putting politics before country puts American citizens at risk,not our Hustler and Chief who will be safe as a baby should another attack occur due to their incompetence.

Cheney spent the last few months calling the Obama administration out on these types of ignorant moves dealing with intelligence and the War on Terror.

Nothing will vindicate Bush/Cheney more than the disastrous Presidency of Barack Obama.

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 10:10 PM

Well, I also think this makes the CIA look like kind of an inept organization themsel

Rhinoboy on August 19, 2009 at 10:11 PM

This is gigantic. The only people who could screw up a gift like this are………are………are……..

Republicans.

>sigh<

drjohn on August 19, 2009 at 10:08 PM

Dam# it hurts to admit it…but you are right.

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 10:12 PM

Predictably pathetic. Everybody (except Obama and the geniuses in his administration) knew Panetta was unqualified for the job. And I agree with Bishop: we’ll be very lucky if we can survive 4 years of Obama’s incompetence without a lot of innocent Americans getting killed.

AZCoyote on August 19, 2009 at 10:12 PM

From the story:

In fact, in all of General Hayden’s three years at CIA he had exactly two meetings on this, according to a close associate of his. More indicative, Hayden—known to be extremely punctilious—didn’t once mention these plans to George W. Bush, Stephen Hadley (Bush’s national security adviser), or Dick Cheney. (So much for “Cheney’s secret CIA program,” as so many Web sites dubbed it.) Had it been anywhere close to implementation, he surely would have obtained White House signoff. Anything else would have been political suicide. Nor did he brief Congress, according to this associate, because it didn’t approach the legal threshold. It was hardly “significant anticipated action” that obligates a congressional briefing, and it wasn’t clear that it would ever in fact lead to covert action. This was still in the exploratory, intelligence-collection stage.

“If we briefed Congress on every single foreign intelligence-collection activity,” one former CIA director tells me, “we’d be a very small intelligence agency attached to a massive congressional briefing agency.”

We will be lucky to survive these people. They are like the gang that could not shoot straight.

Terrye on August 19, 2009 at 10:12 PM

I am SHOCKED!!

canopfor on August 19, 2009 at 10:13 PM

The article is a False Flag operation.

Or, just a way to purge (and embarrass) the Clinton folks.

faraway on August 19, 2009 at 10:14 PM

Say,wasn’t he from the Bimbo Eruption Administration!

canopfor on August 19, 2009 at 10:15 PM

Eh, well, FDR essentially declared war on businesses too…

Upstater85 on August 19, 2009 at 10:01 PM

You are right.

Maybe I should have posted this instead:

So how are all of those FDR God,JFK,and Lincoln comparisons going liberals.

Better?

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 10:15 PM

but, as these recent events demonstrate, Panetta—…probably wasn’t the best choice after all.”

No d’uh.

I would laugh if only this wasn’t so tragic and dangerous.

LASue on August 19, 2009 at 10:16 PM

I am SHOCKED!!

canopfor on August 19, 2009 at 10:13 PM

I’m not, but I’m scared and wish I was living back down in Kentucky, away from civilization.

Knucklehead on August 19, 2009 at 10:16 PM

“Not only has Panetta become deeply unpopular within the agency, but, as these recent events demonstrate, Panetta—honorable, decent, savvy—probably wasn’t the best choice after all.”

Wow! That quote reads almost like a mad-lib, doesn’t it:

“Not only has _______ become deeply unpopular within the agency, but, as these recent events demonstrate, ______—______, _______, savvy—probably wasn’t the best choice after all.”

Tim Geithner
Geithner
elf-ish
wormy

Weight of Glory on August 19, 2009 at 10:18 PM

I can’t read it. Just too much bad news in one day. It all gets old.

JellyToast on August 19, 2009 at 9:54 PM

My response exactly. My head’s ready to explode.

misslizzi on August 19, 2009 at 10:19 PM

I can’t wait for olberman to get Seymore Hearse back on to correct this on his show .

“Ahhh, about those assassination squads…..Bush lied about that to…

Now on to all those gun toting racist at the town halls.”

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 10:19 PM

Yep.

Not sending a resume there

blatantblue on August 19, 2009 at 10:20 PM

probably wasn’t the best choice after all

Geez, get a little more weasel-y, Finder, could you? Excuse me, ahem: That probably wasn’t the strongest closing line Finder (who writes pretty good thriller novels for a living) is capable of writing.

CK MacLeod on August 19, 2009 at 10:20 PM

Meanwhile,HilRod,supreme architect of the Vast Left Wing Conspiracy,only pounds away from morphing into Madelein
Albright,is probaly working in mysterious ways,to kabosh
Obama’s presidentcy,and purge those that jumped the Clinton
ship,to join Team Hopey,

just an idea!!!ahem.

canopfor on August 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM

I can’t wait to read what regular DB columnist Meghan McCain has to say on this issue.

Probably something about Palin.

Rhinoboy on August 19, 2009 at 10:02 PM

Or that Rush Limbaugh was mean to Bwarney Fwank!

Esmerelda on August 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM

Or that Rush Limbaugh was mean to Bwarney Fwank!

Esmerelda on August 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM

BOR was first!

Rush is late!

blatantblue on August 19, 2009 at 10:23 PM

DOW up 62 pts
Bush recession over
Democrats have the votes
adults are in charge

/getalife

Fallen Sparrow on August 19, 2009 at 10:24 PM

Leon Panetta’s an incompetent moron who’s jeopardizing U.S. security

He IS??? REALLY???
Wow, wonder how he slid in there under the radar…

uncivilized on August 19, 2009 at 10:24 PM

Can you imagine the morale there? I am feeling a general lack of respect for those who try to keep the country safe, from the local level all the way to the CIA.

Cindy Munford on August 19, 2009 at 10:24 PM

No surprised looks allowed. We are talking about Leon “I have not taken a dump in twenty years” Panetta.

He’s way beyond exlax.

patrick neid on August 19, 2009 at 10:24 PM

When a nookyaler weapon gets smuggled through Baltimore harbor and exploded in an east coast city, Panetta will just say he was mistaken in his belief that it could never happen.

I will continue to say that Ogabe and the dolts he appoints are going to get a lot of innocent people killed before he is driven from office.

Bishop on August 19, 2009 at 9:57 PM

Bishop: I think its called a,’Man Made Disaster’!:)

canopfor on August 19, 2009 at 10:25 PM

Romper Room

the Coondawg on August 19, 2009 at 10:27 PM

Say,wasn’t he from the Bimbo Eruption Administration!

canopfor on August 19, 2009 at 10:15 PM

How are you going to blame it on the women?

We all knew that Obama and his whole posse are not capable of doing the job needed.

TXMomof3 on August 19, 2009 at 10:28 PM

Well, that was one, big, needless amputation. I wonder how much it will ultimately cost?

Dusty on August 19, 2009 at 10:28 PM

Pelosi blinked, CIA sinked!

SouthernGent on August 19, 2009 at 10:28 PM

And this surprises who?

Panetta’s only real qualifications for ‘intel’ work was:

[A] sneaking Bubba’s trollops past Hitlery and the MSM.

[B] lying with an utterly straight face [and that skill-set was a 'dime-a-dozen' in the Clinton WH].

…for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap. Gal 6:7

CPT. Charles on August 19, 2009 at 10:29 PM

Meanwhile,the Jihadys are laughing their #ss’s off,at
another Liberal Leadership Debacle,which means,its only
a matter of time,

think of the Clinton Administration,where its all about
Team Liberal,and not *Team America,(*sorry for the pun)!

canopfor on August 19, 2009 at 10:30 PM

Can you imagine the morale there? I am feeling a general lack of respect for those who try to keep the country safe, from the local level all the way to the CIA.

Cindy Munford on August 19, 2009 at 10:24 PM

Morale has got to be beyond bad.
I think in just 6 months, the CIA probably hates Obama and his lackey’s with a passion:

The CIA’s Fight With Obama
By Jack Kelly
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/printpage/?url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/05/the_cias_fight_with_obama_96333.html

The CIA’s war against President Bush was motivated by ass covering, or by political partisanship. But with President Obama, it’s personal.

Many are furious about his disclosure of explicit details of the interrogation methods used on some al Qaida bigwigs, and his waffling on whether or not those who employed them will be subject to prosecution.

Other Western intelligence services regard the Obama administration with contempt and rising concern,

….

“All of us in our little community are worried — us, our friends in Berlin, London, Tel Aviv,” the DGSE officer told Jack. “It is not like the barbarians at the gates. It is every barbarian horde in the world being told there are no gates.”


Obama Administration to Release Detainee Abuse Photos; Former CIA Official Says Former Colleagues ‘Don’t Believe They Have Cover Anymore’

April 24, 2009 10:23 AM
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/04/obama-adminis-3.html

Even though President Obama has announced that the Justice Department will not prosecute CIA officers who were operating within the four corners of what they’d been told was the law, Lowenthal says members of the CIA are worried. “They feel exposed already, and this is going to increase drumbeat for an investigation or a commission” to explore detainee treatment during the Bush years, he said. “It’s going to make it much harder to resist, and they fear they’re then going to be thrown over.


Of course now we know that Holder is probably going to appoint a special prosecutor to go after CIA agents to satisfy his left wing idiots.

Those in intelligence are “gong to become increasingly wary about doing dangerous things,” Lowenthal said. “They feel at the end of the day they won’t be covered. It’s not irreparable right now, but it’s problematic.”


There is no doubt what-so-ever that we are less safe under the Obama administration.

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 10:37 PM

Yep.

Not sending a resume there

blatantblue on August 19, 2009 at 10:20 PM

Yep. Me either. My spouse and I have talked about it as a possible way to use our talents to serve our country – neither of us could get into the military due to minor but disqualifying physical impediments – but after this, no way.

I feel bad for the hardworking, decent CIA employees. I bet a lot of them are considering career changes right about now. Don’t blame ‘em if they do.

Gilda on August 19, 2009 at 10:42 PM

I thought the Daily Beast was Meghan McCain.

Upstater85 on August 19, 2009 at 10:03 PM

no her monthly beast comes daily though

cubbieblue25 on August 19, 2009 at 10:44 PM

Say,wasn’t he from the Bimbo Eruption Administration!

canopfor on August 19, 2009 at 10:15 PM
How are you going to blame it on the women?

We all knew that Obama and his whole posse are not capable of doing the job needed.

TXMomof3 on August 19, 2009 at 10:28 PM

TXMomof3: Blameing it on the women!

HELL NO,the Sexual Predator in Chief had Leon Panetta
on the talk shows 24/7 defending Bill!

I believed all of the women,that Bubba debaucherized!!
—–:)

canopfor on August 19, 2009 at 10:48 PM

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 10:37 PM

I think between the probable Special Prosecutor and those stupid stupid pictures, we have much to worry about. And I don’t think it will net him the political benefits that his cronies believe it will. There will be no winners.

Cindy Munford on August 19, 2009 at 10:49 PM

If anyone on the planet knows about Obama and his friends, and their background, it has to be the CIA. If they don’t know, we’re screwed. If they do know, they have to be really P’Od.

Skandia Recluse on August 19, 2009 at 10:50 PM

I think between the probable Special Prosecutor and those stupid stupid pictures, we have much to worry about. And I don’t think it will net him the political benefits that his cronies believe it will. There will be no winners.

Cindy Munford on August 19, 2009 at 10:49 PM

You are absolutely right.

Unfortunately history shows this type of incompetent leadership costs lives, so even though there will be no winners,there will certainly be losers.

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 10:55 PM

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 10:55 PM

Yes, I remember the Carter years all too well. And it doesn’t stop everyone in the media and Congress (both sides of the aisle) from saying that this is the smartest man to ever inhabit the White House. Makes me want to scream.

Cindy Munford on August 19, 2009 at 10:59 PM

Without explicitly apologizing, he assured the men—whom he’d in effect accused of breaking the law—not to worry: The whole thing would quietly go away. He told them that he’d been pre-briefed by the officer conducting the internal inquiry, and that when the report came out it would indeed back them up. It would come swaddled in vague banalities calling for improving communication between the CIA and Congress. And the whole thing would die a quiet death.

Ummm, has Sandy Burglar regained his security clearance? Something tells me that that his magic disappearing pants and socks are going to be getting a lot of work with this administration and all their screw-ups.

red winger on August 19, 2009 at 11:04 PM

Sandy Burglar? Wasn’t he hired as “Head of White House Security”, or as Rahm refers to it “Chicago, East”?

Hahahahahahaha!!

GarandFan on August 19, 2009 at 11:07 PM

Gilda on August 19, 2009 at 10:42 PM

I’m at a crossroads.

I’ve wanted to work for the CIA for a few years, and I think I have a lot to offer them, in terms of skills and on my feet thinking.

However, story after story comes out that just makes me feel that I should look elsewhere, like NYPD’s counter terror unit

blatantblue on August 19, 2009 at 11:09 PM

When a nookyaler weapon gets smuggled through Baltimore harbor and exploded in an east coast city, Panetta will just say he was mistaken in his belief that it could never happen.

I will continue to say that Ogabe and the dolts he appoints are going to get a lot of innocent people killed before he is driven from office.

Bishop on August 19, 2009 at 9:57 PM

Don’t worry, Napolitano’s DHS is hard on the case of geriatric neo-nazis trying to use an Israeli nuke to spark a war between Russia and the US so that a fascist Europe can arise from the ashes.

It’s beyond words how sad it is that’s not hollywood pipedreaming anymore but government policy.

jarodea on August 19, 2009 at 11:11 PM

Makes me want to scream.

Cindy Munford on August 19, 2009 at 10:59 PM

That’s why liberals have to re-write history, because none of their ideology makes sense when put into perspective and made to pass the test of reality.

This is why you get that brainwashed look of stupidity when talking to a liberal about the “glorious hippy days of the 60′s and how they stopped the war”,then you have to reveal to them that over 3 million people were brutally murdered while Jane Fonda and her liberal friends were bragging about their “victory”.

They never get that part of history from their liberal professors.

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 11:14 PM

Don’t worry, Napolitano’s DHS is hard on the case of geriatric neo-nazis trying to use an Israeli nuke to spark a war between Russia and the US so that a fascist Europe can arise from the ashes.
jarodea on August 19, 2009 at 11:11 PM

Ahh, there must be some kind of mix up.


This is the enemy the democrats are warning everybody about
being such a threat to America:


Meet the Mob

2009 August 6
by DanaLoesch
http://thedanashow.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/meet-the-mob/

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 11:20 PM

Obama needs a CIA Czar.

Daggett on August 19, 2009 at 11:39 PM

The motto of President Obama’s administration is quickly going from “Yes We Can” to “Did I Do That?

29Victor on August 19, 2009 at 11:41 PM

Panetta—honorable, decent, savvy—probably wasn’t the best choice after all.”

Ya think???????

I wonder how much Nancy Pelosi is going to pay Panetta after he quietly slinks out the back door. And I mean that in all seriousness. She’s filthy rich, and he saved her career.

rockmom on August 19, 2009 at 11:42 PM

Panetta—honorable, decent, savvy—probably wasn’t the best choice after all.

That was obvious before he got the job. He has zero experience and knowledge of the work.

dogsoldier on August 19, 2009 at 11:45 PM

Google lists 44 (and counting) related stories, including this one from the Washington Post. White house fax/phone/internet connection working at full speed to get this on the wires.

All but one posted within the last hour.

Skandia Recluse on August 19, 2009 at 11:47 PM

Honorable, decent, savvy????

On June 23, in the course of a routine briefing by the head of the National Counterterrorism Center, Panetta first learned about the assassination squads. Alarmed, he terminated the program at once and called the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-TX). He told Reyes he’d discovered something of grave concern, and requested an urgent briefing for the House and Senate intelligence committees as soon as possible. Less than 24 hours later, he was on the Hill, “with his hair on fire,” as a Republican member of the House committee put it. “The whole committee was stunned,” said Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-CA).

That’s way generous…

r keller on August 19, 2009 at 11:49 PM

Honorable, decent savvy?

I’d rather have Putin run our CIA. At least he knows how to kill people.

Mojave Mark on August 20, 2009 at 12:00 AM

As if putting a guy who doesn’t know d*ck about intelligence in charge of the CIA was going to turn out well. I bet other intel agencies around the world roll around laughing at our stupidity and incompetence.

jonezee on August 20, 2009 at 12:01 AM

That was obvious before he got the job. He has zero experience and knowledge of the work.

dogsoldier on August 19, 2009 at 11:45 PM

Well then he should quit his job right now and run for president.

29Victor on August 20, 2009 at 12:12 AM

To be a little contrairian here, but IF a nuclear attack occurred on our soil in the next 3.5 years, the American people would automatically rally around the CINC in a very similar fashion to the trade center attacks on 9/11 rallied around Bush. A blood price would quickly be defined for retaliation. We are weakened for now but the thirst for revenge will overwhelm iedological fervor to DO something harsh. The Won, like Bush, will bring an immediate surge in approval ratings if he would just act Presidential . My suggestion would be to take ALL Iranian nuclear sites back down to the Stone Age. But it could save Obama’s presidency if it is done well. So to a certain extent we are held hostage to forces beyond our control.

GnuBreed on August 20, 2009 at 12:12 AM

However, story after story comes out that just makes me feel that I should look elsewhere, like NYPD’s counter terror unit

blatantblue on August 19, 2009 at 11:09 PM

Sad to say but you might be better off personally – and do better for others – someplace other than CIA.

NYPD’s counterterrorism unit is world-class, without question. Can’t say the same for the CIA at this point. Too politicized. Too much of a pawn and prop for ignorant elitist government officials.

Gilda on August 20, 2009 at 12:19 AM

My suggestion would be to take ALL Iranian nuclear sites back down to the Stone Age. But it could save Obama’s presidency if it is done well. So to a certain extent we are held hostage to forces beyond our control.

GnuBreed on August 20, 2009 at 12:12 AM

Great points but I believe that through Obama’s appeasement policies toward terrorist nations like Iran combined with his obvious disdain for Israel, it will force Israel to take action against Iran because the missiles are pointed at them.

Obama is much more concerned about his legacy than he is about world peace.His left wing base would never accept a pre-emptive attack against Iran.
Obama values his political skin more than stopping millions from possibly dying if Iran gets the bomb and does what it has promised to do, wipe Israel off the map.

Baxter Greene on August 20, 2009 at 12:22 AM

However, story after story comes out that just makes me feel that I should look elsewhere, like NYPD’s counter terror unit

blatantblue on August 19, 2009 at 11:09 PM

You also might want to look up “COLDWARRIOR” on this subject.
He posts here a pretty good bit and I believe has extensive history with Central Intelligence.

Baxter Greene on August 20, 2009 at 12:24 AM

thought the Daily Beast was Meghan McCain.

Upstater85 on August 19, 2009 at 10:03 PM

No, the Daley Beast is sitting in the Oval Office (when he isn’t campaigning). (The other Daley Beast is sitting upstairs, conferring with her handmaiden staff.)

onlineanalyst on August 20, 2009 at 12:26 AM

I am totally shocked that one of BO’s appointments wasn’t a good choice.

/

Bob's Kid on August 20, 2009 at 12:35 AM

Daily Beast: Leon Panetta’s an incompetent moron who’s jeopardizing U.S. security

Well, he is a Democrat after all.

CP on August 20, 2009 at 1:17 AM

Panetta—honorable, decent, savvy

Maybe in Universe 101B this might be true. In out universe a man that savages women to protect a President isn’t honorable or decent. His blunders at CIA kind of rule out the savvy part also.

chemman on August 20, 2009 at 1:20 AM

Nothing will vindicate Bush/Cheney more than the disastrous Presidency of Barack Obama.

Baxter Greene on August 19, 2009 at 10:10 PM

Consider them vindicated.

NoLeftTurn on August 20, 2009 at 2:01 AM

Exit quotation: “Not only has Panetta become deeply unpopular within the agency, but, as these recent events demonstrate, Panetta—honorable, decent, savvy—probably wasn’t the best choice after all.”

Panetta represents Church by other means, or maybe those means, so yeah the CIA he heads, hate his guts and rightly so.
The result is the same as under Carter, the President flies blind.

By Emerson Vermaat

January 8, 2009 – San Francicsco, CA – PipeLineNews.org -

Leon Panetta, president-elect Barack Obama’s choice for future chief of the CIA, previously strongly sympathized with the “Institute for Policy Studies” (IPS), a Washington based leftist think tank known for its bitter opposition to the intelligence community, notably the CIA. As a member of Congress Panetta supported the IPS’s “Coalition for a New Foreign and Military Policy Line” in 1983. He was also one of the congressmen who bienially commissioned IPS to produce an “alternative” budget that dramatically cut defense spending. He did so together with, among others, fellow democrat John Conyers, known for his close links to the World Peace Council (WPC), an organization financed and led by the former International Department of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (ID-CPSU). And there is even more shocking information: the Soviet Russian secret service KGB appeared to be highly interested in the activities of IPS. This controversial think tank was targeted by a number of KGB agents who will be mentioned below.

Speakup on August 20, 2009 at 2:16 AM

President Obama, reasonably, wanted an outsider to run the CIA, someone whose hands, by definition, were clean.

Unfortunately, what made sense in theory

Did it?

hasn’t worked out in reality. The job called for someone who knew where all the hidden levers were.

Well. No $#!T.

apollyonbob on August 20, 2009 at 2:23 AM

JOb Listing; CIA director wanted. No experience necessary;

firefighter13 on August 20, 2009 at 2:28 AM

Sheesh – has Obama done ANYTHING right since he took office? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

tballard on August 20, 2009 at 2:35 AM

After reading this article, the comments, and the complete article at DB, I only have 2 questions:
What did Pelosi know?
And when did she know it?

mrt721 on August 20, 2009 at 3:08 AM

The Daily Beast is a center-left/RINO news outlet

When did they get someone on staff that’s “center?”

TugboatPhil on August 20, 2009 at 7:08 AM

Obama and his group of morons is quickly overtaking Carter as the most incompetent, moronic, disturbingly evil administration in our history. Some day they’ll write books about the stupidity.

Jeff from WI on August 20, 2009 at 7:19 AM

JOb Listing; CIA director wanted. No experience necessary;

firefighter13 on August 20, 2009 at 2:28 AM

LOL…exactly…actually the last real good one was Bush the elder.

Jeff from WI on August 20, 2009 at 7:20 AM

It’s not their fault.Democrats just aren’t any good at national securuity, strategic intellegence or the military.
They’re better at the arts, and gay things.

Jeff from WI on August 20, 2009 at 7:22 AM

Comment pages: 1 2