WSJ/NBC poll shows ObamaCare fading; Update: Poll data coming out later; Update: New numbers look as bad as the old
posted at 1:36 pm on August 18, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Update: The key data in the post below comes from a survey done at the end of July. Here’s the NBC report from today on the poll coming out this evening:
And according to a brand-new NBC News poll, 47% of Americans — a plurality — oppose the public plan, versus 43% who support it. That’s a shift from last month’s NBC/WSJ poll, when 46% said they backed it and 44% were opposed.
In a follow-up question explaining the benefits and disadvantages associated with a public plan, 45% said they agreed with the description — by supporters — that it would help lower health-care costs and provide coverage for uninsured Americans.
But 48% sided with opponents who say a public option would reduce access to their choice of doctors, and would lower costs by limiting medical treatment options.
Here’s what happened. When I read the MS-NBC report on the poll, I went to the WSJ front page and found the headline for a poll, but didn’t realize that headline was for a story from three weeks ago. Thanks to Geoff A for pointing out the difference. I’ll have the new poll data when it gets released.
My apologies for the confusion. However, it doesn’t look as though the thrust of the post will be incorrect when the latest poll data gets released today.
Update II: Geoff A forwarded me the PDF from the new survey … and it’s at least as bad as the end of July. Same survey type (adults), the partisan sample is even more skewed (33% Democrat/20% Republican without leaners, 41%/29% with leaners), and still bad news for Obama. Some lowlights:
- Overall approval drops from 53% to 51% — and that’s with a four-point boost to the Democratic advantage in the sample of adults, as opposed to registered or likely voters
- Health care approval gap spreads to -6, with 47% disapproving and 41% approving
- Support for a complete overhaul of the health-care system dropped from 33% in April to 21% in August. Support for a “minor reform” jumped 10 points to 31% in the same time period.
- 40% of respondents say that Obama’s plan will make their health care worse, as opposed to 24% who say it will improve it. In April, those numbers were 24% and 22%. He’s lost 16 points on that question.
- The public option still trails, 47%-43%.
- What will ObamaCare bring? 55% believe it will allow access to illegal immigrants, 54% believe it will lead to a full gov’t takeover of the health-care system, and 50% believe that tax money will pay for abortions. On the plus side, 50% thought death panels were unlikely to happen, although 45% weren’t as sanguine.
With a sample like that, Obama should have gained ground. Instead, he’s losing ground. It’s not brain surgery to figure out why.
Original post follows:
=============
The longer Americans look at ObamaCare, the less they like it. A new poll by NBC and the Wall Street Journal of adults, rather than likely or registered voters, confirms that Barack Obama has lost ground on his ambitious overhaul of the US health-care industry. Two months ago, a WSJ/NBC poll showed Americans split on ObamaCare. Now a plurality opposes it, and only 15% of those currently with insurance think it would improve their care:
In mid-June, respondents were evenly divided when asked whether they thought Mr. Obama’s health plan was a good or bad idea. In the new poll, conducted July 24-27, 42% called it a bad idea while 36% said it was a good idea.
Among those with private insurance, the proportion calling the plan a bad idea rose to 47% from 37%.
Declining popularity of the health-care overhaul reflects rising anxiety over the federal budget deficit and congressional debate over the most contentious aspects of the legislation, including how to pay for it. The poll also shows concern over the role of government in determining personal medical decisions. …
In the Journal poll, only two in 10 people said the quality of their own care would improve under the Obama plan; just 15% of those with private insurance thought it would. Twice as many overall, and three times as many with private coverage, predicted their own care would get worse.
Again, sampling adults rather than registered voters or likely voters would tend to skew polls more to the left — which makes this result even more compelling. Their sample includes 30% Democrats and 22% Republicans, without leaners; with leaners, it’s 42% Democrats and 33% Republicans, which seems like too wide a split for any real predictive value.
Given that, it’s not surprising that Obama’s job-approval number in this poll is still at a majority, but at 53%, it’s getting closer to crossing the line. Three months ago, that number was 61%. He’s now below the majority line for handling the economy, with a 49% plurality of approval. On health care, however, he’s below water, with a 46% plurality disapproving of his performance, while only getting 41% approval.
And on individual mandates, the news looks especially bad for Obama. Only 34% approve of requiring Americans to carry health insurance, while 60% oppose the individual mandate. The business mandate for offering coverage has slipped in support from 55% a month ago to 49% now. These have been key points of Obama’s health-care reform, and people have begun rejecting government mandates — which would eliminate the entire notion of saving costs on services to the uninsured, a critical component of Obama’s argument for reform.
In other words, Obama and his allies are losing ground. Why? People have had the opportunity to ask questions — and find out that the people who pushed this legislation have no clear idea of what’s in it. The natural suspicion of common-sense people when seeing complicated matters being handled in a rushed fashion piqued their interest, and the more they discover, the less they like.
Update: Gallup’s poll now shows Obama at his lowest approval rating — a still not-bad 52% — and at his highest disapproval, 42%.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Waterloo baby! W.A.T.E.R.L.O.O.
redwhiteblue on August 18, 2009 at 1:39 PM
No wonder they wanted to rush it through. The more that Americans examine it, the less they like it, except for the hard left.
Drained Brain on August 18, 2009 at 1:39 PM
They will ram it thru using Reconciliation.
Count on it.
The fat lady is no where to be found.
Knucklehead on August 18, 2009 at 1:40 PM
ObamaCare = EPIC FAIL
Chances of passing has now plummeted to the low 20s on InTrade.
Norwegian on August 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM
I think the Dems are about to get the crash-cart out to resuscitate ObamaCare.
teke184 on August 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM
Euthanize the bill……..
PatriotRider on August 18, 2009 at 1:42 PM
I don’t think ObamaCare is fading so much as trust in the messenger is fading. People seem less willing to believe him, and this will carry over to other policy areas. My guess is everything is fading.
JiangxiDad on August 18, 2009 at 1:42 PM
The worse the numbers the less awful the crap sandwich we’re eventually forced to eat.
BadgerHawk on August 18, 2009 at 1:42 PM
I Don’t care if it’s fading. I want it dead and buried and gone.
That any United States Administration would attack and demonize LAWFULLY ACTING corporations and threatening them with destruction is disgusting. These people should be run out on a rail and the mid term elections will not come soon enough.
Skywise on August 18, 2009 at 1:42 PM
Independents to MSM: Gee, you know that information… really would’ve been more useful to me in November.
WashJeff on August 18, 2009 at 1:43 PM
Imagine how low his poll number would go if he actually told the truth about what he believes and what he wants for this country.
Spiritk9 on August 18, 2009 at 1:43 PM
NBC weighting the polls to make it appear better than it actually is. First of all, “leaners” are MUCH more likely to be embarrassed and/or “stealth” libs now. I think the negatives are higher by 25% MORE than this poll suggests.
marklmail on August 18, 2009 at 1:45 PM
I am seeing more & more people who were Obama supporters building an immunity to the Hopey Changey Virus they were all happily infecting themselves with in ’08.
I knew Obama would eventually out himself as an incompetent far left hack, but not right out of the gate. 7 months in office and he is his own worst enemy.
portlandon on August 18, 2009 at 1:46 PM
If was like
aWeiner?WashJeff on August 18, 2009 at 1:46 PM
Hillary is in the WH right now, supposedly to report to Obama about Africa.At the moment, she’s chatting to Biden, while O plots to destroy Israel with Mubarek. I wonder what she’s telling Biden, as he’s the new Health care spokesperson, and she has such “experience” with the topic.
JiangxiDad on August 18, 2009 at 1:46 PM
I have no idea what if or what kind of health care reform passes. I do know that Dear Leader and his friends now know that there is a conservative voice out here that they are going to have to deal with the rest of this administration. We will be heard and we will vote.
d1carter on August 18, 2009 at 1:47 PM
JiangxiDad on August 18, 2009 at 1:47 PM
I dont want it to fade….I want it to disappear like the skidmark on the underwear of America that it is!!!
Asajj Ventress on August 18, 2009 at 1:47 PM
Well she didn’t take care of herself so those
deaathalternative-life panels denied her ObamaCare.No fatties!
rbj on August 18, 2009 at 1:48 PM
I think O has always lived in a liberal blue bubble. This must be something of a shock to him.
JiangxiDad on August 18, 2009 at 1:49 PM
From the CBS Evening news in the near future……..
Seven Percent Solution on August 18, 2009 at 1:49 PM
So the Dems “Reconcile” and ram it through. The startup glitches alone in whatever monstrosity they end up with will make Cash for Clunkers look positively efficient.
Then come the 2010 elections…
Drained Brain on August 18, 2009 at 1:50 PM
That brings to mind the movie Dave when the VP comes back from an African trip showing what gifts he was presented to give to Dave.
WashJeff on August 18, 2009 at 1:52 PM
not fading fast enough….
PatriotRider on August 18, 2009 at 1:52 PM
You just summarized everything the Obama administration has done (and will do).
VibrioCocci on August 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM
Joey B: I’ll wack ‘em in the back of the head and swear its a suicide, If you’ll be my VP and alibi. Come on… you did it to Vince, what’s one more.
Laura in Maryland on August 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM
He tied himself to this bill and there is more at stake then just this power grab going south. What happens when you keep showing your true colors…remember Cambridge Mass, remember Stupid…a lot of Americans have that stuck in their brain. Nancy Pelosi called the C.I.A. Liars. Obama called the Police Liars and now they are calling American Citizens the Mob.
http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2009/08/obama-fighting-for-his-presidency-not.html
Dr Evil on August 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM
Which will be too late to avoid the catastrophe.
Beltway Bandit on August 18, 2009 at 1:55 PM
is the 15% just kool-aid drinkers and the media??
cmsinaz on August 18, 2009 at 1:55 PM
I think Biden should have a Townhall…..that would be fun, and it would kill the bill at the same time
PatriotRider on August 18, 2009 at 1:55 PM
If Obama’s poll numbers are still this high we have a surplus of brain dead idiots still infesting the country.
duff65 on August 18, 2009 at 1:55 PM
LOL
cmsinaz on August 18, 2009 at 1:55 PM
yeah, this is far from over.
Obama wants to be the one that signs a huge health bill so that he’ll be known for generations, the savior of the US.
The libs will do whatever it takes. they’re working the Senate Dems right now.
r keller on August 18, 2009 at 1:56 PM
The percentage opposed to O’CommieCare is probably greater because most Liberals I’ve encountered certainly wouldn’t qualify as “adults.”
viking01 on August 18, 2009 at 1:57 PM
David Axelrod used the Massachusett’s governor’s race as a test ground for all that hopey and changy and coined Yes We Can.
Will Obambi follow the same fate as Deval Patrick the emptiest of empty suits….
Governor Deval Patrick’s approval rating nears zero
by: Bill Dupray posted: 2009-08-18 12:36:00
Okay, at 19% it is technically still double digits, but given that the reviled, detested and utterly evil George W. Bush had an all-time low approval-rating of 20%, which was also the lowest figure for any president in history, Patrick is really plumbing the depths.
The latest quarterly poll from MassInsight, a nonprofit research institute, spells more bad political news for Governor Deval L. Patrick: His job-approval numbers have plunged to levels not seen in decades for a Massachusetts governor.
In a survey of 445 residents, taken last month and released this week, only 19 percent of respondents gave him a positive job rating, while 77 percent rated it fair or poor. One percent said he was doing an excellent job. Those numbers are significantly worse than last month’s Globe poll, which also found him to be struggling politically.
‘Struggling politically’ when used by liberal media to describe liberal politicians is a euphemism for ‘getting his ass handed to him.’
The PR office pool is now open for your picks for the date after January 6, 2011 (when Patrick becomes unemployed) on which he joins the Obama Administration. You will get 1000 extra points (which have the same value as an Obama campaign promise) if you correctly name the department or position in which he will serve.
Good luck.
Ricki on August 18, 2009 at 1:57 PM
More weird WH stuff. Bill Clinton is also scheduled to meet privately with Obama today, to bring him info. re. his meeting with NK’s Kim. (I’m guessing that means an end to the 6-party talks which NK hates, and the beginning of 2party talks which they want.) But SoS Hillary is sending a deputy to that meeting with her husband, instead of attending herself, even though she is in the WH.???
JiangxiDad on August 18, 2009 at 1:57 PM
Of course Napoleon was emperor for a decade before he had his downfall and had managed to dominate almost a whole continent.
Obama’s been in office six months and the only accomplishment is giving a trillion dollars to his friends.
18-1 on August 18, 2009 at 1:59 PM
ding ding ding
+100
cmsinaz on August 18, 2009 at 2:00 PM
Yes, I think the ObamaCare Bill is in need of some “end of life” counseling. ;-)
Logic on August 18, 2009 at 2:00 PM
We need to be pushing the GOP and SCOTUS to take on Obamacare on purely Constitutional grounds. No where is the federal government empowered to run a health care system. Medicare and Medicaid included. Simply ask all Obamacare supporters for the passage in the Constitution that supports their desired takeover.
The 10th Amendment is quite clear on the limits of Federal power “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
“In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson
DerKrieger on August 18, 2009 at 2:00 PM
She is talking about a document she picked up in Kenya, lol
Vashta.Nerada on August 18, 2009 at 2:00 PM
DNR
cmsinaz on August 18, 2009 at 2:01 PM
I do wonder just what the Leftists/Marxists/Socialists think we Conservatives are going to do if Obamacare passes. Do they think we’ll quietly go home and sulk and accept defeat? I don’t think they are prepared for what may happen if they don’t stop trying to force socialism on a free people. 10th Amendment challenges to Obamacare will be the least of their worries but they too will happen. I think a lot of Red states will push through initiatives similar to Arizona’s nullifying Obamacare in their states.
We may see some real armed uprising because a free people won’t simply lay down and willing become enslaved to the federal government. Does the Left not understand this? Unlike the Left, we like our guns and have a lot of them.
DerKrieger on August 18, 2009 at 2:01 PM
If they have the guts to do it, as Mr. Robinson urges them to do.
I of course am hoping they don’t.
Drained Brain on August 18, 2009 at 2:01 PM
still can’t help giggling about how quickly this administration has dropped like a lead stone. And they are so thick headed to boot.
No sir, you do not have a mandate
Doctor Zhivago on August 18, 2009 at 2:01 PM
Damn, he’s in a freefall. And this is with crap-and-betrayed shelved and amnesty and tax hikes still on the horizon.
Doughboy on August 18, 2009 at 2:02 PM
And I wonder how many of Obama’s relatives she smuggled in :)
JiangxiDad on August 18, 2009 at 2:02 PM
A real news coup right now would be to see who is on Rahm’s “hit list”. And he ain’t shopping for Christmas presents.
GarandFan on August 18, 2009 at 2:02 PM
What is the next target should Obamacare pass? Our private retirement system/market? What? We know Progressives/Marxists won’t rest until we’re all slaves to the government so what is the next target? This is why we can never rest.
“In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson
DerKrieger on August 18, 2009 at 2:03 PM
Plausible deniability. Hillary needs an alibi.
SoS aide: Why is my briefcase ticking?
portlandon on August 18, 2009 at 2:03 PM
Very well said, and my sentiments exactly!!!
capejasmine on August 18, 2009 at 2:04 PM
MA racism on full display. The whole place should be kicked out of the progressive soviet socialist ass’n of states. Disgraceful!!
Obama–boycott MA. Cancel your summer trip to Martha’s Vineyard. It’s full of racists!!!
JiangxiDad on August 18, 2009 at 2:05 PM
Rushing it through was key. It’s been key to everything they’ve proposed. Without it, they’re lost. Consider what that says about their political and moral character: their success depends on people not learning more about their ideas and not debating them. Very American.
rrpjr on August 18, 2009 at 2:05 PM
the picture says it all….good choice Ed!
cmsinaz on August 18, 2009 at 2:05 PM
Among adults? No problem, lower the voting age to 5. And give out lollipops.
Bat Chain Puller on August 18, 2009 at 2:06 PM
Most of the country is on vacation or just not paying much attention. The stock market is up. The media have grasped any morsel of good news on the economy to try to convince people that it isn’t in the tank. So a lot of people who rely only on the MSM for their news still think Obama is doing a good job.
The remarkable fact is that Obama started out with a stratospheric 75% approval rating and that has fallen by over 20 points in just six months. Independents now are more likely to disapprove than approve of his job performance.
rockmom on August 18, 2009 at 2:06 PM
There is no trust for these criminals. KILL THE BILL! No negotiations. No compromises. Nothing.
If they force this unconstitutional socialist abortion on the country they will be responsible for the consequences.
elduende on August 18, 2009 at 2:07 PM
Yep.
And Barry’s BIG problem, which will become more and more apparent, is that there is no substance there.
Once the BS and the shuck and jive fade away there’s nothing left.
PaddyJ on August 18, 2009 at 2:08 PM
OBAMACARE IS DEAD! DEAD! DEAD!
battleoflepanto1571 on August 18, 2009 at 2:10 PM
I just clicked through your username. Dude, you owe me a monitor and a replacement coffee.
Laura in Maryland on August 18, 2009 at 2:11 PM
“If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, what more do you people want from me?”
NickelAndDime on August 18, 2009 at 2:11 PM
“Healthcare” is different than “Health Insurance,” just as the automobile is different than “auto insurance.” The solution here is simple: even a Gekko could figure it out:
1) Medical malpractive tort reform, including liability caps and a “loser plays” law to discourage slip-and-fall lawyers. “Defensive medicine” and malpractice insurance is killing the system.
2) Get illegals out of the system; emergency room care for American citizens only. Bill the country-of-origin for U.S. healthcare received (or deduct it from foreign aid.)
3) Require citizens to have commercial proof-of-insurance for medical, just like automobile insurance.
4) De-couple health insurance from employment, unions, etc. Make it portable, and treat it like family auto insurance; you should not lose your insurance just because you changed jobs. Allow insurance companies to build lifecycle-long relationships with customers, to enjoy young/mid-life profits to offset end-of-life costs.
5) Let Health Insurance companies compete nationally, not just state-by-state. Why does there need to be 39 independent Blue Cross-Blue Shields?
6) Let Medical insurers innovative, e.g. “good driver discounts” for health insurance: non-smoking, low-body fat/BMI, wellness, low-risk lifestyle, etc. Charge “points” (just like with car insurance) to the premiums for high-risk customers, e.g. $250/year for smokers; $5/pound over your target weight; $100/year for skateboarders, skiiers, and other active/injury-prone groups, etc.
7) Increase competition: let AAA, GEICO, Progressive, State Farm, Liberty Mutual, etc. get into nationwide health insurance. They are masters are handling claims and minimizing costs in a highly-regulated environment. Let them offer health, auto, life insurance bundles… just like AT&T does wireless, home phone, and TV. (And who do you think does a better job spotting and stopping insurance fraud: GEICO, of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services? Hmmmmm?)
8) We know demographics play a role in insurance: 16-21 year old males are nightmares for auto insurers; so are 65+ year old seniors for health insurers. Factor this into the acturial base, and manage your rate structure accordingly: if you want the business for our family’s healthy 25-40 year olds, you have to take Grandma, too.
9) Eliminate pre-existing condition rules. Life insurers know you’re going to die someday, and they stay in business. Health insurers know you’re going to sick some day; that’s life… and that’s business in any numbers-game industry. Casinos don’t throw you out for getting Blackjack.
10) No “Death Panels,” but require living wills: make it easier for families to “pull the plug” for their near-deceased loved ones, who have insisted [in writing] that no extraordinary life-saving be used for them. We do this for our ailing pets… but we watch our grandparents rot away over a period of months, or years?
BOTTOM LINE: We need to get, and keep, the Government out of health care. Their track record — VA Hospitals, public mental institutions, MediCare, and Medicaid — is a lesson in how NOT to do it.
VastRightWingConspirator on August 18, 2009 at 2:12 PM
no worries
cmsinaz on August 18, 2009 at 2:12 PM
cmsinaz on August 18, 2009 at 2:00 PM
As Elvis would say: “Thankya verrah much.”
viking01 on August 18, 2009 at 2:12 PM
I’ve been listening to Mark Steyn, and he was talking to a caller about how this might just be the rope-a-dope strategy:
tell America the public option is dead, then have congress pass a public-option-lesss bill (rammed through with 50 votes), THEN in conference committee add the public option back in, and badda bing badda boom, ObamaCare is enacted, with a mere 50 votes.
I want to think this won’t happen, because the dems would be reduced to about 160 members in the house after 2010 if they did that…. and Obama would be a 1 termer, if only for the reason that it was all a big lie and no one would EVER believe ANYTHING he said….. so would he do it??
battleoflepanto1571 on August 18, 2009 at 2:12 PM
But SoS Hillary is sending a deputy to that meeting with her husband, instead of attending herself, even though she is in the WH.???
JiangxiDad on August 18, 2009 at 1:57 PM
TXUS on August 18, 2009 at 2:12 PM
I wish but I’ve got a bad feeling about this
Doctor Zhivago on August 18, 2009 at 2:13 PM
They are no doubt arguing over which one was dumber for giving up their Senate seats.
David2.0 on August 18, 2009 at 2:13 PM
OBAMACARE= “Change You Can DECIEVE In”
justonevictory on August 18, 2009 at 2:13 PM
nice pic, huh :)
JiangxiDad on August 18, 2009 at 2:15 PM
Obama wants a prime time slot so he can read his “Declaration of Dependence” to the nation.
darwin on August 18, 2009 at 2:15 PM
I smell another prime time speech in the GREEN HOUSE (all plants), coming up soon.
Jeff from WI on August 18, 2009 at 2:15 PM
I LAWL’D!
HondaV65 on August 18, 2009 at 2:16 PM
Yeah, but some hit shows last a few seasons. Obama might want to ditch Michelle and talk to Paula Abdul. Might give the show another season at least. On a much more serious note, if Obama did marry someone hot, or get a hot girlfriend like Sarkozy did, I really think he could get his poll numbers up.
JiangxiDad on August 18, 2009 at 2:18 PM
Or discussing their 2012 primary challenge to the One (shhh.)
JiangxiDad on August 18, 2009 at 2:19 PM
Now that’s funny.
JiangxiDad on August 18, 2009 at 2:20 PM
WTF? That 52% is still way too high.
Winebabe on August 18, 2009 at 2:21 PM
battleoflepanto-YES.
di butler on August 18, 2009 at 2:22 PM
It’s a coup! The Clintons are storming the White House! Hillary will be POTUS and VPOTUS, Bill will be SoS.
Brat on August 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM
Obama wouldn’t let Biden paint a town hall, much less hold one.
David2.0 on August 18, 2009 at 2:24 PM
Thank the 88-90% of Dem’s who think “the one” is just doing a bang up job.
David2.0 on August 18, 2009 at 2:25 PM
I’d love to see the takeover of 1/6 go the way it for the Clintons. Unfortunately, and as much as I’d love to see it, I think this is far, far from done. These are people who will do whatever it takes to get their agenda done. They have to shove something through for Obama’s sake.
Too much effort/resource/time has been invested by the congressthugs, the MSM, & any/all others to make Dear Leader out to be our Savior. I cannot foress that backing down, which would be perceived as failing, is an option for them.
Rahm Emmanuel will not let this manufactured crisis be wasted. If nothing else they’ll tack bits on to funding for our troops. They’ll sneak it in piece-meal if they can’t get the whole bloody package in one swoop.
Keep ever peaceful & even more vigilant in opposition.
As always, God help us & our nation.
PalmettoPatriot on August 18, 2009 at 2:26 PM
i don’t think the P.O. passes the house. there are 52 blue dogs and we only need 40 defectors (assuming new orleans’ cao stays loyal, keeping all gop in the no column) to beat it. there are far too many blue freshmen and sophomores like heath shuler that are far more concerned about losing their job than a public option.
the senate? its tricker. who will defect? we dont just need 10, we need 11 (b/c of the tie breaker). who is there?
-Baucus MT
-Tester MT (maybe?)
-Dorgan ND (maybe?)
-Conrad ND
-Bayh IN
-Landrieu LA
-Lincoln AR
-Pryor AR (maybe?)
-Nelson NE
-Bingaman NM (maybe?)
that’s only 10, assuming all those red state d’s come through. who else? SPECTER? Virginia’s Warner? Alaska’s Begich????
Man i wish we had norm coleman right about now….
battleoflepanto1571 on August 18, 2009 at 2:26 PM
But Obama is doing such a fine job of screwing it all up on his own, what more could Biden add?
I mean, comparing Obamacare to the post office was a whopper. Biden would have to come up with something really good to beat that one. I’m sure the clown could do it though, without even trying too hard.
UltimateBob on August 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM
Oh woe is me. Now Michelle can no longer be proud of her country.
Way to go, you damn racists.
8>P
On the serious side, this is only the first skirmish; these people have a powerful hankerin’ for some serious “social justice” and they don’t particularly care who or what they have to destroy in its pursuit.
Vigilance.
hillbillyjim on August 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM
John Boehner writes Big Pharma.
Strong stuff starting from the first sentence:
Drained Brain on August 18, 2009 at 2:33 PM
Sorry to be a process geek, but that can’t happen. The only way to get this through with 51 votes is through reconciliation, and if they add a trillion-dollar public option back in during conference THEY HAVE TO PAY FOR IT in the final bill. Won’t happen. Reconciliation requires that the bill is revenue-neutral.
rockmom on August 18, 2009 at 2:34 PM
It’s not over until the conference bill is voted on. And I mean that in the worst way possible.
DrSteve on August 18, 2009 at 2:36 PM
You can add Bennett (CO) to that list. He was never elected, just appointed after Salazar became Sec of the Interior and is up for election in 2010.
An overwhelming majority of Coloradoans are against ObamaCare according to a recent poll. Also, Obama’s approval rating has tanked here.
It would be political suicide for Bennett to vote for the bill. He will lose in 2010 anyway, but I am sure he would like to have a chance.
Norwegian on August 18, 2009 at 2:36 PM
What you say is true in theory, but don’t for a minute think that they won’t fudge the numbers in order to get their desired outcome. They have too much at stake at this point not to go “all in”.
hillbillyjim on August 18, 2009 at 2:38 PM
what do you think about Ryan Frazier? never heard of him until recently, but he’s polling pretty well for an unknown against Bennett.
And i hate to say it, but from his speech delivery, he sounds MUCH like Obama — the republican version — delivery style only :)
battleoflepanto1571 on August 18, 2009 at 2:39 PM
I can’t see Warner or Jim Webb voting for a public option. There are 44 Senators representing states that voted for McCain, and that doesn’t include Warner and Webb. I don’t think Dick Lugar will vote for a public option either.
Bob Casey and Arlen Specter are going to get a lot of pressure on it, too – over 200,000 jobs in Pennsylvania depend on pharmaceuticals and bioscience, and there is a huge elderly population in PA that opposes the Medicare cuts in the House bill. (PA has the second-highest % of population over age 65.)
rockmom on August 18, 2009 at 2:40 PM
Obamacare: It’s as shovel ready as it gets.
ted c on August 18, 2009 at 2:41 PM
They may try in the the House, but Republicans can procedurally shut down the Senate if they try it there, and they will. That’s why Max Baucus is still trying to get a bill with Republican support. They know in the Senate that they don’t have any realistic shot to get anything passed without 60 votes, and they don’t have 60 votes for a public option.
rockmom on August 18, 2009 at 2:42 PM
the senate? its tricker. who will defect? we dont just need 10, we need 11 (b/c of the tie breaker).
battleoflepanto1571 on August 18, 2009 at 2:26 PM
First – if Byrd and Kennedy cannot vote due to health reasons then the GOP need 50 in opposition rather than 51.
Second – this assumes it goes through reconcillation, i.e. the nuclear option. If that happens look for more to defect than the 10 you have listed and none of the Republicans to defect.
Jed_Eckert on August 18, 2009 at 2:44 PM
When the refs come bouncing out of the tunnel at the start of the game, each and every one wearing cheerleaders’ uniforms and waving pom-poms for one team, it does them no good to try to change back into their zebra-outfits midway through the first quarter so they can at least pretend to be evenhanded and fair.
This is just NBC (GE?) trying to get off a ship that’s taking a little water, so it doesn’t take them down with it. To the press: “Good luck with that.”
Blacksmith on August 18, 2009 at 2:48 PM
I think if they squeak it out of the House, the Senate will pull the reconciliation stunt to get it through w/ 50 votes.
These evil-doers will use any bogus facts or numbers to get their victory. Hillybillyjim is on to something.
I’d be surprised if some of this wasn’t to create chaos as they plot to charge through w/ something. Consult Alinsky’s rules to see how they may fight.
As some have thought, they’ll cost themselves at least part of Congress & possibly Obama re-election to have this shining victory as their historical legacy. The rest of us will suffer with that legacy.
PalmettoPatriot on August 18, 2009 at 2:49 PM
The Canadians are doing a study on this – look up in the headlines.
Vashta.Nerada on August 18, 2009 at 2:51 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »