Video: Liberal Dem says dumping the public option will cost 100 House votes
posted at 4:10 pm on August 17, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
The Hill focuses on the political aspect of this CNBC appearance by Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY), but the opening argument from Weiner has to be heard to be believed. Weiner, who actually held a town-hall forum for his constituents, says that ObamaCare opponents are lying to seniors, which is why they’re so dead set against health-care reform. In fact, Weiner thinks that seniors should be grateful for the single-payer system they already have, and insists that consumers of Medicare think it’s wonderful:
Medicare has actually been a pretty successful program. It has some financial problems, but as far as consumers are concerned, they like it.
Except for “some financial problems,” people like Medicare? That’s akin to asking, “Other than that, how did you like the play, Mrs. Lincoln?” Medicare has $36,000,000,000,000 (that’s trillion with a T) in unfunded liabilities in the next 25 years. That’s not “some financial problems,” as Weiner puts it in today’s worst understatement, and ObamaCare promises to make the problem worse — by expanding the program and its coverage.
Amazingly, CNBC doesn’t call him on this statement. Aren’t they supposed to be reporting on financial matters?
Next, Weiner says that opponents are scaring seniors by claiming that Obama will cut Medicare. I wonder where they got that idea? I guess that would be from Obama himself, who proposed almost $500 billion in cuts to Medicare and Medicaid to pay for ObamaCare, which the House used in its version of the bill.
But the topper of that statement comes from saying that consumers of Medicare love the system. At best, it’s tolerable, made so only by Medicare Advantage, which allows its consumers to buy supplemental insurance for broader coverage, better choice of providers, and a wider range of services. Guess what Obama, Weiner, and the rest of the liberals in Congress want to cut to pay for their “reform”? Medicare Advantage, a program demonized by Obama at every opportunity.
And I say that as the spouse of a Medicare consumer. If Weiner’s been within a hundred miles of a Medicare EOB, I’d eat my hat.
As for the politics of dumping the public option, I suspect it won’t come to that. They’ll simply create government-managed co-ops that will do exactly what the public plan would have done — undermine the private sector and allow employers to dump their health-insurance costs. The liberal wing of the Democratic Party will eventually go for that Trojan horse, the same way they’ve been cheering the Trojan horse of a public plan as the gateway to one single-payer health-care system in America.
Update: In case you missed it, The Moderate Voice has allowed me a “guest voice” to reprint my Modest Proposal for a single-payer legal system. I wonder why Weiner hasn’t joined me on that push yet. For a less satirical pushback on ObamaCare, be sure to read Jazz Shaw’s rebuttal to his fellow TMV writers.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Yeah and aside from a little ice issue the Titanic was a great boat.
The government through mandates, trial lawyer campaign bribes and anti competition regulations has created the health care cost escalator, giving the government more control guarantees out of control costs, cuts in the quality and quantity of care and guarantees the aspect of a “wonderful” government mandating what we get treated for or not, what we eat, what we drive or ride in, where we work what work we are allowed, where we live or if we’re allowed to live, what restaurants have on the menu, every facet of our lives can be associated with health care and falls under government mandate.
Tyranny defined.
Speakup on August 17, 2009 at 6:52 PM
That is the real problem. We’re already in too deep. Can we even count a half dozen in DC who can be trusted to bring any passion to our struggle?
If the GOP actually served our interests wouldn’t they start EVERY interview with “Where’s Tort Reform? or “Medicare is Bankrupt!” We all agree the media are totally whored out to the DNC but Republicans are no less part of the status quo.
Let’s face it, there is no “Our Side” in Washington. There are a few individuals that stand out but I expect they’ll suck up to the RNC to pimp for them in the next election. The price will be to moderate their speech and be collegial. A GOP rebound in 2010 would only be a stop gap measure and could actually slow our momentum.
rcl on August 17, 2009 at 7:37 PM
It’s time to cleanse the Congress of statists like Weiner. His views do not represent American values. He appears to be a marxist, just like Obama.
BottomLine5 on August 17, 2009 at 8:40 PM
As I’ve informed CNBC, when they have on liberal idiots who add nothing to knowledge and who cost me money rather than helping me make a living, the volume goes on mute.
CNBC used to show better judgement as to who they have on. I wonder if the Olbermanistas at NBC leaned on them.
WannabeAnglican on August 17, 2009 at 9:11 PM
Ed, I’m in the same position as your wife and I have to agree. I have a specialist in another county meaning coverage is more limited and if I did not have the advantage plan I would be forking out thousands more then I do now. In addition Illinois didn’t allow any type of medicare supplement plan for anyone under age 65 until recentlymeaning without med advantage (that the Dems want to cut) I would be royally screwed!
David
LifeTrek on August 17, 2009 at 9:25 PM
“The only thing dumber than a brooding hen is a New York Democrat.”
Stephen King, The Stand
bookman on August 17, 2009 at 9:39 PM
Actually, I would propose privatizing Medicare and eliminating Medicaid altogether. Provide a 100% tax credit for purchase of individual basic policies and allow insurance across state lines. Anyone who is working age should be able to pay for their own health insurance, including people who are here illegally ostensibly to work. Older Americans have already put in their time and built this country to make it what it is today, and should be taken care of, WITH SOME SUBSTANTIAL CO-PAYS so they do not over-use health care services. I would severely limit government-paid health care to elderly people who are poor and have no family that can help, and people with pre-existing conditions that can’t get private insurance.
rockmom on August 18, 2009 at 10:24 AM
dump medicare all together. Conservative claim they hate government run health care. Why not get rid of medicare
liberal343 on August 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM
When you get your talking poinst from idiots you sound like one. The reason we are having this disscussion on HealthCare is because the Government has ruined Medicare. Yes it provides a care that people need and want but is $37 Trillion in the whole because the government runs it. So your inteligent argument is is that we are now supposed to hand over the whole healthcare system to the government because they not us have run their system into the gorund.
mcl2177 on August 18, 2009 at 11:46 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2