Porkulus money flow drops even further

posted at 2:15 pm on August 14, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Two months ago, Barack Obama ordered his Cabinet to pick up the pace of stimulus spending after the public began losing confidence in its ability to generate an economic recovery.  With the unemployment rate heading to 9.5%, the need for Obama’s urgency was obvious.  So the federal government must really have turned on the cash spigots, right?  Wrong:

Stimulus bill spending has slowed to a trickle, despite President Obama’s June order to his Cabinet to speed it up.

The average stimulus spending per week has dropped severely, to just $4.2 billion over the past month from $9.7 billion during the prior four months. The government spent $2.9 billion in the week ending Aug. 7.

Taxpayer groups say the numbers show spending decisions are random and prove that the $787 billion stimulus program has had no effect on the economy.

“This is a typical bureaucracy. They don’t operate in an efficient way. They can’t operate in an efficient way and make an impact,” said Leslie Paige, media director for Citizens Against Government Waste.

When Casey Stengel managed the New York Mets in the team’s debut season — a team that had as many rookies, retreads, and screw-ups as the Obama Administration apparently does — he moaned, “Can’t anyone here play this game?”  It’s been six months for Team Obama, and they keep proving themselves inept at governance.  Instead of picking up the pace, they’ve cut the flow by two-thirds.

This has two salutary effects, of course.  First, the less they spend now, the more Congress could conceivably get back from Porkulus if they decide to call a halt to the farce.  Second, with their continuing ineptitude, the White House demonstrates why the federal government should not be in charge of health care in the US.  If they can’t figure out how to spend $787 billion in a one-time stimulus package, why should we trust them to handle an industry that generates 15% of American GDP, somewhere north of $2 trillion annually?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

But, the stimulus is working all that cash infusion.
No wonder people want it returned/stimulus bill revoked.
This is all going to catch up to Obama and Dems. in a big way come 2010.
Rob

The thing is, I don’t want to wait until 2010 to be shod of them…and waiting until 2012 (Obama) is unthinkable.

DeoGratias on August 14, 2009 at 6:26 PM

C’mon, aren’t we supposed to use the postal service model ?
/sarc

Jeff2161 on August 14, 2009 at 7:08 PM

Hoping to find the RIGHT answer, President Obama has tried to channel many of the country’s past leaders. This is clear evidence that he is going to try to see what President Ford.

Or, could he think that the auto maker Ford had it RIGHT too, because they are the only one to make it without his help.

MSGTAS on August 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM

More “change” you can believe in.

Stimulus transparency watchdogs keep contract details secret
By Christopher Flavelle

Back in July, a software company named Smartronix landed an $18 million contract to build a Web site where taxpayers could easily track billions in federal stimulus money. It was just another part of the Obama administration’s ongoing effort to bring transparency to stimulus spending, we were told.

But it seems the drive for transparency doesn’t cover the contract itself.

After weeks of prodding by ProPublica and other organizations, the General Services Administration released copies of the contract and related documents that are so heavily blacked out they are virtually worthless.

Don’t believe us? Take a look.

ProPublica sought the contract under the Freedom of Information Act to find out what kind of site Smartronix planned to build and to assess whether it justified the cost, which Republican critics of the stimulus plan called “unreal.”

Original Document (PDF) 15.42 MB

18 million to build a website seems like a little much these days. I think I read on one of the links that Google or something was started with only $3,000 dollars in a garage.

Patriot Vet on August 15, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Comment pages: 1 2