Giuliani: Obama only has himself to blame for health-care debate
posted at 9:28 am on August 14, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Want to know why the talk of “death panels” caught fire? Don’t blame Sarah Palin, or even Charles Lane and Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post. Rudy Giuliani tells Politico that the big problem with ObamaCare has been Barack Obama himself and the complete failure of leadership on his signature domestic policy:
Giuliani, in an exclusive interview with POLITICO prior to delivering the keynote address to the second annual GOPAC conference in Chicago, said the president has allowed fears of so-called “death panels” to persist because the White House has not taken a strong enough hand in crafting health care legislation.
“They never really studied the legislation that has been proposed,” Giuliani said. “The reason for the concern about the death panels is the legislation and the claim by the president that he will cover thirty to fifty million people without cost, and any time you say it’s without costs you raise a number of concerns.”
“It has to be with cost, because it costs money with every single person that is covered. That cost has to come from somewhere, which means something has to be cut,” the former Republican presidential candidate explained. “So where are you going to decrease services? There is a great fear that it will be by cutting off care for the elderly.”
Like former Alaska GOP Gov. Sarah Palin, Giuliani insisted that some of the president’s “closest advisors” have advocated for the creation of “death panels” to determine the course of treatment for some elderly and infirm Americans.
“If they’re concerned that they’ve created this massive groundswell that is worried about death panels, the only ones they have to blame are themselves,” Giuliani said of the Obama administration. “If they would like to end it, they should change the legislation, remove all these end of life panels, remove these czars and come clean with the American people that it is going to cost them a lot of money.”
The Obama administration has pushed three extraordinarily large bills in Congress in seven months, and a clear pattern has developed. Obama sets himself as the salesman, but outsources the actual creation of the bill to Democratic leadership in Congress. In each iteration, that Congressional leadership has become more isolated. With Porkulus, they locked Republicans out of the effort to draft the stimulus bill, and with cap-and-trade, they ignored skeptics and moderates in their own party. With ObamaCare, the hard-Left leadership in the House threatened to bypass the committee process altogether in order to keep the Blue Dogs from moderating the direction of reform.
A real leader would have taken control of the process and of the legislation. Yet Obama seems content with his role as salesman instead of executive, speaking around the country in support of a bill that he hasn’t read. The message appears to be, “I trust Nancy Pelosi,” but unfortunately for Obama, most of America does not share that sentiment. Instead, he rebuts the most heated charges about the House bill with assurance that a Republican Senator wrote the clause in question, which turned out not just to be false but also patently ridiculous, since Senators do not write bills that originate in the House. One might expect a high-school civics student to understand that much, but in Obama’s defense, no one in the media seemed to realize it, either.
It does demonstrate, however, the curious disengagement of a President who promised hope and change on the campaign trail. He seems perfectly content to let Nancy Pelosi run his domestic policy with no interference or even any particular objection. Of the big three agenda items Obama has pushed this year, one might have expected him to get most personally involved in health-care reform, the one issue that started with bipartisan support both in the Beltway and among the electorate. Instead, he has floated above the fray and above the details and the hard work, and it shows. When nuggets like Section 1233 come to light, the White House response has been late, incorrect, and usually more damaging than the initial criticisms.
Obama’s not leading. He’s campaigning, and doing that on a float of ignorance about the very bill he touts. Giuliani has it right — this is the President with no leadership clothes at all.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
This is community organizing in action. The President sets the goal then hands the bullhorn to congress and says go to it!
Koa on August 14, 2009 at 10:28 AM
Great speaker…..
um um duh um um duh
drops his g when he is “on”
ssssssssssssss like a snake
so many gaffes, mm needs to write a book of them all.
weaves his head back and forth like a challenged person.
you add some
nondhimmie on August 14, 2009 at 10:28 AM
Oh that was excellent, ted c.
Time for Sarah to hit the road, leave the family at home, get down here and rally the troops. Grab the flag like in The Patriot and turn this thing around!
Mr_Magoo on August 14, 2009 at 10:28 AM
Not really. “Death panels” are an inherent feature of socialized medicine — they can’t be removed. Deleting funding for “end of life discussions” doesn’t touch the problem at all, no matter what they say.
Count to 10 on August 14, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Remember the police rally outside City Hall before the 1993 mayoral election? Rudy was a Klansman as a candidate to the community organizers before he was a Nazi as mayor (and they’ll still tell you New York was better before Giuliani than it was after his two terms).
jon1979 on August 14, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Questioning lack of experience== racism
Asking hard questions about his agenda== racism
Calling his sales pitches just what they are and illuminating his lack of experience== racism
America, do you see what “political correctness” and “affirmative action” has bought us? It has shut your mouth and stifled your freedom of movement. End result..”I Won!”
ted c on August 14, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Obama and the Left have made the mistake of believing their own press.
Fainting women, ‘newsmen’ with tingling legs, celebrity endorsements, choirs of children, etc. They thought a revolution was afoot.
But 52% is not a landslide or a mandate.
The anti-Bush sentiment they spent years stoking can take them only so far. Now people expect these jokers to act like grown-ups and provide good governance. And they’re not up to the task.
jazz_piano on August 14, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Exactly, which further makes my point. It’s just a ruse. Focus on the whole enchilada and continue to swing at the head of this snake with an axe.
ted c on August 14, 2009 at 10:31 AM
ding ding ding
spot on
cmsinaz on August 14, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Of course he’s content. This only convinces me further that the real President is the DNC, with Obama propped up as its pretty-faced, smooth-talker Sales Rep.
misslizzi on August 14, 2009 at 10:32 AM
As Sarah Palin said in her convention speech, “A small town mayor (read leader) is sort of like a community organizer, except you have actual responsibilities.”
SouthernGent on August 14, 2009 at 10:32 AM
who ever thought that a little lipstick and some red naughty monkey toe peepers would pass muster for combat gear?
She needs to just show up out of the blue, right in the enemy’s backyard.
ted c on August 14, 2009 at 10:33 AM
and start stomping mudholes in this thing.
ted c on August 14, 2009 at 10:33 AM
You can say that in hindsight and, yes, he would have been better than the filthy liar we ended up with. Nevertheless, I don’t think I would be entirely happy with a McCain presidency either. He’s far too much of a liberal on social issues to ever be trusted completely. We probably would still have ended up with some version of the stimulus bill, he was in favor of some form of cap & trade, and he was a sponsor of no-strings-attached amnesty.
I’m not happy with the current situation but think in the long-term it may turn out for the best because people are angry and acting against the worst of what they see going on in Congress and government. That wouldn’t have been the case with John McCain in office.
More to the point, do you regret not having McCain as President or just regret that the filthy liar won?
highhopes on August 14, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Apparently, he got tired of it and quit, though I can’t remember if it was to go into law school or go into politics.
Count to 10 on August 14, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Emporer Obama,
Your tailor called. He wants to know why your staff never called to order those clothes.
jazz_piano on August 14, 2009 at 10:34 AM
I agree. But with all eyes on these townhalls, I think they should be figuring out a way to use them as a communication vehicle.
Failing that, no one rivets the attention of the country like Palin. I say enlist her help because the left is absolutely obsessed with her. All the media organizations can’t help themselves. And if she were to be standing with congressional conservatives lauding a very straightforward program for reform, I really think it would make sense to independents. Nothing can be done about the third of the country drinking Kool-Aid, but the middle of the country still has some sense.
BuckeyeSam on August 14, 2009 at 10:35 AM
The battlefield is prepared, the troops are awake, and someone just needs to sound the horn. There needs to be a rally point, a flare go up, and key objectives identified.
ted c on August 14, 2009 at 10:35 AM
Been reading Sharansky’s A Case for Democracy. “Fear societies” have to keep the populace focused on a perceived enemy so they don’t get restless and stop working for the good of the group.
Same applies here. Obama is very good at pointing to perceived enemies in his own country so his supporters don’t get restless and stop working for the good of the group. Different from the fear society is eventually they run out of money. Obama has oodles of money to hand out as entitledments.
We have to stop the flow of money by putting pressure on our representatives to oppose this and other legislation that funds Obama’s agenda.
Mr_Magoo on August 14, 2009 at 10:35 AM
did you see that soros was busy handing out cash for bookbags and stuff in NYC….? Hmmm… a coincidence, I think NOT!
ted c on August 14, 2009 at 10:38 AM
Do you mean “far to liberal on economic issues”?
Count to 10 on August 14, 2009 at 10:38 AM
What would you call someone who had the poor judgment to conceive a child with a philander who travelled the globe siring illegitimate children? Mom?
I call that person a bimbo. His mom/bimbo factually died of female anatomy cancer…i’m just cutting it short and calling it vag cancer.
CMonster on August 14, 2009 at 10:38 AM
I’m going to focus on the President’s character, ideology, and policies, not on his deceased mother.
jazz_piano on August 14, 2009 at 10:41 AM
And we’re all just amateur philosophers and psychologists…opinions are like aholes…everybody has one
CMonster on August 14, 2009 at 10:41 AM
More to the point, do you regret not having McCain as President or just regret that the filthy liar won?
highhopes on August 14, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Good thoughts but the point is moot to me. Those were our choices and I wanted Palin by his side. I think he would have been a different President than a Senator and it would have been better to have a Republican President with a Dem-controlled Congress and less liberal Supreme Court nominees.
Mr_Magoo on August 14, 2009 at 10:43 AM
My original post was examining the reason behind Obama’s push for healthcare and how similar it was to Bush’s push to invade Iraq. I believe both were fundamentally personal in nature.
CMonster on August 14, 2009 at 10:44 AM
I wasn’t aware that the President had character or policies, just ideology
theblackcommenter on August 14, 2009 at 10:45 AM
And what did anyone really expect? ALL HE’S EVER BEEN IS A SNAKE OIL SALESMAN. NO executive experience, NO legislative experience. BIG SURPRISE he’s fallen on his face.
GarandFan on August 14, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Rock, meet Hard Place.
He can’t sell it with the death panels in place and he certainly can’t sell it by admitting how much it is going to cost and in fact, it will cost a lot more with the death panels removed.
Kafir on August 14, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Obama is not the problem. He is the collective’s current leader. And that makes him, by definition, perfect.
The problem is with the American public. There are still an unconscionable number of people who understand basic arithmetic.
While half of all health care is in private hands, the government can’t cut off the top end of the problem — the citizens who have outlived their usefulness to the state.
But the federal government controls practically 100% of the public education system. So the pipeline will continue to churn out properly-trained subjects.
Twenty years from now, when they run this same plan through again, it will work flawlessly.
logis on August 14, 2009 at 10:47 AM
You really think Obama gave a rat’s ass about his white mother?
Disturb the Universe on August 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM
I would not call them anything; they are not part of this debate in any way. The families of candidates and officeholders are off limits, when civilized people discuss policy and politics, using reason and logic.
My original point to you was; when you make an argument, support it. With credible sources, and logical supports.
It’s harder than invective, but oh, so satisfying.
massrighty on August 14, 2009 at 10:51 AM
If she waits, she’ll be sitting by the phone forever. The GOP is too scared to invite her to the dance because they see her as a diversion from their “lofty” goals. She just needs to find some supporters (groups) that will have her speak and let it snowball from there. Once other groups see she is on the road and available, more invites will come.
Mr_Magoo on August 14, 2009 at 10:56 AM
But, there was no “examining” going on – your original post just made a blanket statement, without any supports.
When asked, you replied:
Not.There.Yet.
massrighty on August 14, 2009 at 10:56 AM
As a dear departed friend of mine would say, “Here is some sun-screen. You might want to try some or your private parts will get burnt.”
Mangy Scot on August 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM
What article of the constitution says that families of candidates are off limits? Was that the one where we have to bow to our representatives and state, “Lordly masters, we are not worthy to be in your presence.”
Not only are they not off limits, I would like to see at least half of the viciousness heaped on Laura Bush returned to that HUGE BEHIND THAT RESEMBLES A WEEBLE WOBBLE named MICHELLE OBAMA get whats coming to her.
CMonster on August 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM
by Sarah Palin
you see, Sarah Palin knows and understands that the snake still slithers and the single detail axed by Congress yesterday was simply low hanging fruit. THIS is leadership folks.
ted c on August 14, 2009 at 11:00 AM
He reads speeches well, what I am concerned with is his character.
d1carter on August 14, 2009 at 11:08 AM
from earlier:
All views expressed in the posts of CMonster are strictly political opinions and at least as good or better than most others presented. Permission is released for all those smart enough to adopt them as their own to do so and mimic them at your own leisure.
CMonster on August 14, 2009 at 11:09 AM
To your first point; it’s not an article of the constitution, but the rules of basic civility that make them off limits.
To your second point; you seem to unwittingly reinforce my argument.
Since it was wrong when it was done to former first lady Laura Bush, it must also be wrong to do to others.
Argue your points with reason, logic, and proofs. Leave the incivility to the other side.
massrighty on August 14, 2009 at 11:14 AM
He’s leading to the degree he can. The plan is to keep him “above” the details. Can you imagine Barry engaged in a real discussion/debate of these bills? He’d be destroyed in one second when someone asked him “Did you say in 2003…?” Game over; and any credibility he had left would be gone.
marklmail on August 14, 2009 at 11:19 AM
I see the reality of death panels built into Obama’s history. It was he alone that aggressively sought to slaughter innocent babies by witholding nutrition and hydration (one of the cruelest ways to die) from any baby who escaped the abortionist horror chamber.
It was he that referred to a baby as punishment.
It was he that overturned the Mexico agreement providing funds for China to provide forced unwanted abortions with our money.
It was he that saw no evil in using unborn live human embyros as mere material for medical experimentation.
Any man cold-blooded enough to advocate such evil would have no trouble ridding the world of his latest problem -old people.
The next Kristallnacht will be the broken crutches, walkers, wheelchairs and canes of that undesired class -old people.
He has already loosed his union goons to use violence(hit them twice) against the scared frail and weak.
Why was no one afraid when he demanded a civilian army equal to our military in strength for his own? Did you think he would use them to pass out Christmas toys?
Don L on August 14, 2009 at 11:24 AM
Absolutely no doubt about that. Though I do think you are overlooking McCain’s propensity to cut deals with Democrats including hard left individuals like Feingold and Kennedy. Given the fact that McCain was more interested in courting Democrats than energizing his base, I suspect he would have been a President that would have been brokering deals with the other side and ignoring the concerns of social conservatives like me.
highhopes on August 14, 2009 at 11:26 AM
That’s because The One’s only talent is his ability to spew forth verbiage in a way that makes the elites’ legs tingle. His entire claim to presidential qualification rests on his oratory.
But frankly, unlike the Beltway political class (Democrat and Repblican), most Americans don’t give a rat’s ass that Obambi can discuss the ides of Reinhold Niebuhr coherently or turn an impressive phrase. His single talent is vastly overrated and when it comes down to actually doing something, Obama is at sea.
As Sarah Palin observed, community organizers don’t actually have to accomplish anything. So when you elect one as President, don’t be surprised when you get a guy with no executive ability at all.
Cicero43 on August 14, 2009 at 11:28 AM
Please post your external proof of basic rules of civility as evidenced by a printed guidebook of some sort…otherwise I will have to come to the conclusion that you are subjecting me to your opinions instead of fact.
Please prove that it was wrong to subject Laura Bush to political attacks through the basic rules of civility handbook. My assertion was that families are not off limits…there are no legal precedents, no written guides, and that people of the United States of America are free to be aholes if they want to.
CMonster on August 14, 2009 at 11:29 AM
Don L on August 14, 2009 at 11:24 AM
+1000
Chilling.
Disturb the Universe on August 14, 2009 at 11:33 AM
One of the most interesting aspects of the modern Left is that they are proud of their ignorance of history and civics. Obama is certainly a prime example of this, but you see it across their whole movement.
It does partially explain why they seem to think the same old socialism will work this time…because most of them don’t know it failed the last 50 times it has been tried.
18-1 on August 14, 2009 at 11:34 AM
I really am coming to the conclusion that Barack Obama is a dumbass.
I suspected it strongly during the campaign and said so, but his actions since taking office leave me with no other possible explanation. He is a veritable ventriloquist dummy, and Rahm Emanuel and who-knows-who-else is actually running the country and putting the words in his mouth. Get him away from the script and the teleprompters, and he can’t explain anything his administration is doing or planning.
I believe this election was engineered by Pelosi and Emanuel, to bring in a puppet President they could manipulate and control, while they passed their lifelong leftwing wish list. They couldn’t allow Hillary Clinton to win the election because they knew they could not control her. I think Obama may even be so dumb he hasn’t figured it out yet. Rahm knows how to talk to him and make him think he is actually calling the shots and that turning everything over to Pelosi is a good idea.
rockmom on August 14, 2009 at 11:35 AM
The Artic Fox has just hit Obama again via Rahm’s brother and now she questions the outrageous cost of single payer healthcare. Go read her Facebook page.
Right this red hot minute she doesn’t have to do anything. She is getting her message out and not using the MSM. If you want to know her mind, go to Facebook. Just pure, unadulterated ‘Cuda. Read it and weep, doubters. Even you will be able to understand it.
I sure hope Rudy runs for governor. NY is in financial trouble like we have never seen before. Far worse than back in the early ’70s. Someone has to straighten it out because we just cannot keep going down the wrong path with Democrats.
Rudy is right, there is no leadership in this country. Look to the North. You are starting to see it.
BetseyRoss on August 14, 2009 at 11:41 AM
I think context matters and what you mean by “off limits.” To their credit, the Clintons kept Chelsea far from the public eye. Conversely the Obamas use their kids as props to the point that the White House objected to an ad campaign for a liberal nutrition group asking why the President’s daughters get a healthy lunch at school but the little vegan in the ads cannot. The way I look at it, the underage children of Presidents should be off limits to the extent that their parents maintain their privacy. Therefore, it is more appropriate to comment on the comings and goings of the Obama children.
When it comes to First Spouse, that’s a quasi-public position and some commentary is going to arise. It may be petty and crass but Michelle Obama’s ample rump and inability to wear sleeves are fair game. As is the fact that her racist inside seeps through so that she will never be attractive on the outside.
highhopes on August 14, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Like I said earlier:
CMonster on August 14, 2009 at 11:43 AM
Bama’s disengagement from the work is understandable in that all he has ever done is talk. Never even learned to throw a baseball. While the vast majority of the poltical class are similar, Bama lacks any notable accomplishments even among those who talk for a living. His “present” votes on hard issues indicate he doesn’t want to have to take hard paths, even if he only might have to talk about why he did.
“Coward” comes to mind.
There is an advantage in this disengagement…he can make strong statements and promises without having to deliver, and the blowback will fall mainly on Congress, whom he can accuse of misinterpreting his intentions…and those who are blind to this mix of deceit and incompetence will lap it up.
As Guiliani pointed out, Bamma’s failure here has added fuel to the fire, and I think it has created some sympathy for the Birthers. His bald lies (or ignorance) about what he thinks the plan is and what is on the table simply beg the question of what else is he hiding? Now that he is POTUS, why not release all those documents every POTUS candidate in the last 70(?) years has? I am less worried about his citizenship than I am the lack of transparency behind the strident claims of it.
His “signature” issue and he is generally clueless about it, which doesn’t prevent him from making strong statements and promises (but there is a pattern here, see: Gates, Skip and “Coup”, Honduras).
Liar or incompetent are the most logical explanations for this behavior. There just isn’t much to choose otherwise.
Harry Schell on August 14, 2009 at 11:44 AM
FIFY
chemman on August 14, 2009 at 11:59 AM
OOPs too early for a major screw up; Should read
Liar and incompetent is the most logical explanation
chemman on August 14, 2009 at 12:01 PM
Wrong again. This effort to characterize Ovama as naively disengaged or “content to be a salesman” is rubbish. What is it about conservatives that they cannot get Obama? I’m surprised at Giuliani, but realize in his case he needs to be careful what he says.
Obama doesn’t read the bill because he’s essentially lazy and contemptuous of the process and of the great unwashed, not because he’s “content to be a salesman.” He’s shown these qualites throughout his career — quitting jobs, limited attention span, indifference to detail and ordinary people, all of which he believes he can glide beyond with charm, silvery rhetoric and his faux-Socratic “aren’t I such a stunningly articulate and judicious” black man persona. He’s perfectly content with the left-wing scope and slant of the legislation and still intends to ram it through. This is the measure of his contempt, that he thinks $80 million more in ads and more shock troops and more podium lies and more media spin and more of Axelrod’s iron fist will carry the day.
rrpjr on August 14, 2009 at 12:09 PM
Contentment equates to agreement.
unclesmrgol on August 14, 2009 at 12:11 PM
Obama is San Fran Nan’s lapdog.
Little Boomer on August 14, 2009 at 12:14 PM
jazz_piano on August 14, 2009 at 10:30 AM
bingo. BTW Are y’all still expecting?
txmomof6 on August 14, 2009 at 12:27 PM
But that would require the mope to do some actual work; a concept utterly foreign to him. All rhetoric and no action.
Instead of working, he’s giving interviews to 11 year old girls and jetting around the globe, basking in the glow.
guntotinglibertarian on August 14, 2009 at 12:30 PM
I strongly disagree, with regard to Michelle Obama. She campaigned, made highly-ideological speeches, continues to be actively involved in policy.
They use her to prop up The One’s declining popularity. She basks in MSM adoration.
Not only is it OK to attack her. It’s obligatory.
guntotinglibertarian on August 14, 2009 at 12:39 PM
You can’t be a leader if you’re a leftist, not in the way Giuliani means. A leftist doesn’t want to lead; he wants to dictate. A leader, at least in America, needs to accept the premise of imperfection, that is, a vision in deference to our great civic compact. A leftist wants none of that. He only sees the perfection of his vision, uncontaminated by lessers and their lesser, unholy visions.
rrpjr on August 14, 2009 at 1:10 PM
Obama sees himself as the “Campaigner in Chief”, and not much else. That’s why he needs dozens of Czars and hundreds of advisers to tell him how to think and to get things done. It’s exactly what we feared when a person with so little executive experience was nominated for chief executive of the country.
Socratease on August 14, 2009 at 1:23 PM
I didn’t totally overlook it but I was hoping that between being POTUS and letting VPOTUS bend his ear (or twist it), he wouldn’t have as much opportunity. As Senator, he’s got too much time on his hands and too much time on the Sunday talk shows. As President, I hoped he would be more insulated.
Alas, we’ll never know. I’m all for moving forward on potential candidates for 2012. He’s one of my Senators too so I’m all for moving forward with his replacement if one steps up. That stunt he pulled with Feingold/Kennedy and with the immigration closed door fiasco was enough for me as my Senator. Somehow I don’t think that will happen in 2010. Jeff Flake is my district rep and I like him except I think he is wishy-washy on immigration reform and he is probably doing more good in the House right now, IMO. Next time maybe.
Anyway, good talking with you highhopes.
Mr_Magoo on August 14, 2009 at 1:30 PM
The real problem has been these right-wing demagogues on the radio whipping stupid conservative savages into a frenzy. Gigololiani is just being a political whore.
Norman Blizter on August 14, 2009 at 1:34 PM
These people are some of the most incompetent managers I have ever seen. Unlike King Midas, everything they touch turns to a substance other than gold (quite stinky,IYKWIMITYD). This “administration” is more amateurish than Ted Mack’s Original Amateur Hour.
Proud Texan on August 14, 2009 at 1:45 PM
Obama never did a stitch of real work as a State Sen or a US Sen, so why exactly would you expect him to start now? All has has ever been good at is selling his favorite product, himself, and running for the next highest office. I expect that any day now he will declare his candidacy for chancellor of the universe.
holdfast on August 14, 2009 at 1:51 PM
It’s often hard to tell sarcasm from examples of Leftard wisdom. Which did you intend?
Cicero43 on August 14, 2009 at 1:54 PM
Exactly, Ed. And a poor salesman at that, not listening to his customer’s objections. Instead of recognizing he has a product defect and going back and making some changes, he just keeps pushing the product. Being a true narcissist, it’s impossible for him to admit he’s wrong and he hears our complaints. Instead, he believes we just haven’t seen the light yet and recognize the miracle product he has so he keeps selling.
PatMac on August 14, 2009 at 1:57 PM
Whatever else you have to say, say it to Congress!!!
Send them the same message today. All in caps, and end with “yes, I am shouting at you”. Insult Axelrod, Emanuel and Pelosi and Reid. Use ridicule and sarcasm. All of you are pretty good at it.
elclynn on August 14, 2009 at 2:10 PM
When Granny comes home with some pills in a plastic bag
Hurrah! Hurrah!
Obama will give her a hearty high five then
Hurrah! Hurrah!
The Emanuels will cheer, the Kevorkians will shout
The eugenicists they will all turn out
And the old folks will all be dead by Christmas time next year!
Get ready for the Ezekiel Emanuel Jubilee
Hurrah! Hurrah!
He’ll give Dr Obama three times three
Hurrah! Hurrah!
The Doctor of Life and Death degree is ready now
To place upon Obama’s Godly brow
And he will feel so happy and gay
When Pallbearers carry Grandma and Grandpa to the funeral home
Cheshire Cat on August 14, 2009 at 2:56 PM
It is very curious that all Obama wants to do is campaign. You would think everything has gone to his head and he just thinks it takes a nice speech with platitudes to get something done.
You can get away with that in the election, you cannot get away with that as President.
People want a President who will lead. And in a year or two this will be the primary complaint on Obama, not being willing to lead. Think of the great Presidents, all were people who were great leaders followed by their words. Not words followed by a smile and more words.
Rob
rwblake on August 14, 2009 at 3:08 PM
No leadership skills is right. Maybe that will teach Americans to vote for someone with skills and actual experience next time. Geez, what a disaster these voters created. It will take years to undo the damage he’s done, and some of it, like cap and trade and health care, may not be fixable. McCain may not have been the best candidate in the world, but I know he wouldn’t have spent us into oblivion.
scalleywag on August 14, 2009 at 3:31 PM
umm, “real” conservatives (palinstinians) sank him because he is a gay-touching, mexican-hugging rino libtard. remeber?
yet every time an actual conservative who’s not afraid of entering the life of the mind says something aligned with the palinstinian cult, th cultists recite a bunch of “too little too late” in reference to things the subject has always said.
eh on August 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM
His complete lack of executive and leadership skills is alarming.
He is just a talker and a liar at that.
We got three more years with this Hollow Man?
Sapwolf on August 14, 2009 at 4:29 PM
Rudy is right. Obama is just a cheerleader at this point.
Terrye on August 14, 2009 at 4:58 PM
Sarah has shown impeccable timing. As Paul Revere rode Brown Beauty to save the day, so is the Artic Fox coming to the rescue today. Sarah coined the term “death panel” which is now the rage and through her coments changes have been made. Next, dump the whole medical exercise for now. She is just barely set in the saddle folks. She is mounted up and, then, look out. Ride Sarah, Ride. Get on board that Love Train and bring sense and savvy and ability and experience to this WH in 2012. Bring America back to us. Go Sarah. So far more than good.
highninside on August 14, 2009 at 5:51 PM
This is cute;
Upthread, when you made a couple of statements, (which you presented as if they were either fact, or generally understood to be truths) I asked you for supporting proofs.
Instead of providing them, you have answered me back with a similar challenge.
I will answer.
There is an excellent printed guidebook, which contains all the basic rules of civility one could need.
It’s called the Bible.
Try Matthew 25:40 “Inasmuch as you have done it to one of the least of these my brothers, you have done it to me.”
And, Luke 6:31 “Do unto others, as you would have them do unto you.”
These rules are widely accepted by many, and practiced by many, so they should suffice.
As to your second request:
This is also answered by my previous citations.
massrighty on August 14, 2009 at 8:51 PM
Rudy’s a very smart and tough pol…now, if he could control those facial twitches…..
tatersalad on August 14, 2009 at 8:52 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2