sent to flag@whitehouse.gov

I am really at a loss for what to say in this letter other than to convey my shock. To start, abhorrent party animals are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the “poeta nascitur, non fit” that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that Democratic Congress recently went through a particularism phase in which it tried repeatedly to support international crime while purporting to oppose it. In fact, I’m not convinced that this phase of its has entirely passed. My evidence is that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, Democratic Congress’s lickspittles don’t really care that those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to encourage our spirits to soar have no right to complain when it and its spokesmen impair the practice of democracy.

When Democratic Congress is challenged, it either denies everything or claims that its words were taken out of context and that its enemies are plotting against it. The denial of this fact only proves the effrontery, and also the stupidity, of jackbooted, randy sideshow barkers. Democratic Congress’s apparatchiks are hardly strangers to elitism. In just a moment I’ll discuss some important recent developments based on this fundamental truth. First, however, I want to add a bit to what I wrote previously. If Democratic Congress had lived the short, sickly, miserable life of a chattel serf in the ages “before technocracy” it wouldn’t be so keen to hijack the word “phenolsulphonephthalein” and use it to provide the pretext for police-state measures. Maybe it’d even begin to realize that it ignores a breathtaking number of facts, most notably:

Fact: It is a small dollop of pond scum masquerading as an organization.

Fact: It functions not as a social critic, but as an unoriginal imitator of the ruling ideologues.

Fact: It should exercise greater judiciousness when extolling unilateralism.

In addition, its criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, Democratic Congress’s criticisms are based solely on its emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in its “I think … I believe … I feel” game.

Too many emotions to count raced through my mind when I first realized that some reputed—as opposed to reputable—members of Democratic Congress’s army of gin-swilling pipsqueaks quite adamantly allege that we ought to worship worthless, vengeful polluters as folk heroes. I find it rather astonishing that anyone could think such a thing but then again, Democratic Congress’s victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Democratic Congress’s protégés, who loudly proclaim that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. Regardless of those maledicent proclamations, the truth is that if I said that it is a spokesman for God, I’d be a liar. But I’d be being utterly honest if I said that I’m no psychiatrist. Still, from the little I know about psychiatry I can unequivocally say that Democratic Congress seems to exhibit many of the symptoms of Asperger’s syndrome. I don’t say that to judge but merely to put Democratic Congress’s tendentious, destructive imprecations into perspective. Let me end by saying that I know that what I have written in this letter will send many readers (especially any who are big fans of Democratic Congress) into a tizzy or a tantrum. I am sorry, but I remind them that Democratic Congress’s methods of interpretation provide a vivid example of how Democratic Congress seems to have a bitter ideological conflict with my statement that it’s a social liability.

Viper1 on August 13, 2009 at 9:15 PM