Quotes of the day

posted at 10:52 pm on August 13, 2009 by Allahpundit

“In January, the Congressional Budget Office projected a deficit this year of $1.2 trillion before Obama took office, with no estimate for actions he might take. To a large extent, the CBO’s estimate simply represented the $482 billion deficit projected by the Bush administration in last summer’s budget review, plus the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, which George W. Bush rammed through Congress in September over strenuous conservative objections. Thus the vast bulk of this year’s currently estimated $1.8 trillion deficit was determined by Bush’s policies, not Obama’s.

I think conservative anger is misplaced. To a large extent, Obama is only cleaning up messes created by Bush. This is not to say Obama hasn’t made mistakes himself, but even they can be blamed on Bush insofar as Bush’s incompetence led to the election of a Democrat. If he had done half as good a job as most Republicans have talked themselves into believing he did, McCain would have won easily…

In my opinion, conservative activists, who seem to believe that the louder they shout the more correct their beliefs must be, are less angry about Obama’s policies than they are about having lost the White House in 2008. They are primarily Republican Party hacks trying to overturn the election results, not representatives of a true grassroots revolt against liberal policies. If that were the case they would have been out demonstrating against the Medicare drug benefit, the Sarbanes-Oxley bill, and all the pork-barrel spending that Bush refused to veto.”

***
“‘In the second term, he felt Bush was moving away from him,’ said a participant in the recent gathering, describing Cheney’s reply. ‘He said Bush was shackled by the public reaction and the criticism he took. Bush was more malleable to that. The implication was that Bush had gone soft on him, or rather Bush had hardened against Cheney’s advice. He’d showed an independence that Cheney didn’t see coming. It was clear that Cheney’s doctrine was cast-iron strength at all times — never apologize, never explain — and Bush moved toward the conciliatory.’

The two men maintain respectful ties, speaking on the telephone now and then, though aides to both said they were never quite friends. But there is a sting in Cheney’s critique, because he views concessions to public sentiment as moral weakness.”

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6

Yes it was central to his campaign. But do really think the American wouldn’t understand if he said “Things change. We are in a war on terror now and right now is not the time to cut taxes.”

Don’t get me wrong I’m all for cutting taxes. I just think war time is the appropriate time to do that.

terryannonline on August 14, 2009 at 9:51 AM

No way – the media (which was already heavily invested in hating him) would have cut him off at the knees. His political opposition would have never let go. AND, reneging on a tax pledge did not work out well for GHW Bush, now did it.

massrighty on August 14, 2009 at 9:54 AM

AND, reneging on a tax pledge did not work out well for GHW Bush, now did it.

massrighty on August 14, 2009 at 9:54 AM

But we didn’t end up with the huge deficit under GHW Bush like under W.

terryannonline on August 14, 2009 at 9:58 AM

Leading conservative economist Bruce Bartlett writes that the Obama-hating town-hall mobs have it wrong—the person they should be angry with left the White House seven months ago.

As I wrote earlier, if duke of dumbsh!t here knew half of what he was talking about he would know that it is not only
“conservative mobsters” at these town halls:


Brooklyn Mobsters: ‘You Are Bankrupting Our Country. You Guys are Crooks’

http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2009/08/brooklyn-mobsters-you-are-bankrupting.html

Angry, un-American evil-monger dares to question a Democrat

Keep in mind as you read this that Anthony Weiner’s district votes overwhelmingly for him every two years, and prior to that it was Chuckie Scumer’s Congressional seat, so we’re talking about the bluest of blue districts. This isn’t a bunch angry rednecks (as the media would call them) venting their spleens. These are hardcore urban Democrats and they seemingly don’t want any part of this health care fiasco.

Bartlett’s article is so bad that the only thing I can guess that is going on is that Krugman is leaving the NY Times and this idiot is doing his best to fill his spot.

Baxter Greene on August 14, 2009 at 10:12 AM

Brooklyn Mobsters: ‘You Are Bankrupting Our Country. You Guys are Crooks’

(via Instapundit)

Baxter Greene on August 14, 2009 at 10:13 AM

But we didn’t end up with the huge deficit under GHW Bush like under W.

terryannonline on August 14, 2009 at 9:58 AM

GHW Bush was able to ride the upswell created by the Reagan tax cuts.

GW Bush’s presidency did enjoy the beginnings of a new surge in revenues, resulting from the tax cuts, but these revenues were then subsumed by the cost to the economy of the September 11th attacks, the dampening effects of a recession that was already underway when he took office, and the costs of the war on terror.

So, what you have is a good and earnest attempt to grow the economy (and the tax base,) affected by unforseen events.

massrighty on August 14, 2009 at 10:22 AM

Even though I didn’t agree with everything Bush did… I must say he’s still my favorite president in my lifetime. I’m only 27 but still :)

terryannonline on August 14, 2009 at 10:33 AM

Bartlett is a liar on so many levels.

To start, we do not have a planned economy. The President is not our CEO. Saying the President has “primary influence” on the Federal Reserve Chairman means “of all the people the Fed Chairman can ignore, the President is the loudest”.

In terms of history, Clinton did not take office until 1Q1993 so using 4Q1992 skews the results. Clinton did not see an unchecked boom over his term, he ended with a dot-com bust that rocked world markets. Bush presided over a burst bubble, a terror attack that grounded all civilian air transport in the United States–something unprecedented, even in WWII– and wild speculation on global commodities markets for years. Bush did not start an “unnecessary war” in Afghanistan— a comment that pretty much shows Bartlett is so far Left he’s in orbit.

as for the political calculus–we did object strongly to Republican pork and TARP and Bush’s total cave to the corporate fatcats. Obama is just the second president to ignore us on these matters–but he’s the CURRENT PRESIDENT. Even Bartlett can’t be so stupid as to miss why we yell more about what Obama needs to DO rather than what Bush ought have DONE.

Chris_Balsz on August 14, 2009 at 11:03 AM

I’m not quite sure how ignorant you have to be to believe this “Bush rammed TARP through congress” drivel….but I suspect you can bend light with such density.

No president can ‘ram’ anything through congress. The only motive forces are the congresscritters themselves.

TARP was rubber-stamped almost exclusively by DEMOCRATS. Sure, Bush was amenable to the legislation, and happily signed it (the dumbass) regardless of its illegality, but nevertheless – DEMOCRATS passed this legislation and DEMOCRATS own the consequences in their entirety.

LimeyGeek on August 14, 2009 at 11:03 AM

Even though I didn’t agree with everything Bush did… I must say he’s still my favorite president in my lifetime. I’m only 27 but still :)

terryannonline on August 14, 2009

You were too young to have experienced the greatness of the man, Ronald Reagan. By comparison, GW Bush is, by reasoning and philosophy, a dwarf. Of course, if your frame of reference is him, Billy Jeff and Ogabe, I can see your point.

SKYFOX on August 14, 2009 at 11:11 AM

TARP was rubber-stamped almost exclusively by DEMOCRATS. Sure, Bush was amenable to the legislation, and happily signed it (the dumbass) regardless of its illegality, but nevertheless – DEMOCRATS passed this legislation and DEMOCRATS own the consequences in their entirety.

LimeyGeek on August 14, 2009

You are absolutely right, but…Bush did sign it, so he can’t wash the stench off himself. I think this will stick with him historically, right or wrong, as his doing. And yes, he was most assuredly a dumbass.

SKYFOX on August 14, 2009 at 11:17 AM

SKYFOX on August 14, 2009 at 11:11 AM

Comparisons within that framework remind me of the old expression; “In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.”

massrighty on August 14, 2009 at 11:18 AM

You were too young to have experienced the greatness of the man, Ronald Reagan. By comparison, GW Bush is, by reasoning and philosophy, a dwarf. Of course, if your frame of reference is him, Billy Jeff and Ogabe, I can see your point.

SKYFOX on August 14, 2009 at 11:11 AM

I’ve been watching videos of Ronald Reagan on YouTube lately. He really was a transformational political figure. I really don’t think we will see somewhat like that appear for a good while. I’m not holding my breathe :(

terryannonline on August 14, 2009 at 11:25 AM

You are absolutely right, but…Bush did sign it, so he can’t wash the stench off himself

True, but the idea that a president’s signature immediately washes away all guilt from the legislature is nonsense.

They are the source of these unconstitutional travesties, and they need to shoulder their share of the liability. obama happily endorsed TARP, so for him to now shrug his shoulders like Krusty the Clown and say “I didn’t do it” is just sickeningly fraudulent.

I think this will stick with him historically, right or wrong, as his doing.

While ignorance of our government’s mechanics is widespread, I daresay this will be the case.

And yes, he was most assuredly a dumbass.

SKYFOX on August 14, 2009 at 11:17 AM

Actually, I don’t think he is a dumbass in general (I suspect he’s quite a sharp fella), but he did do some dumbass things.

You can behave like a dumbass without actually being a dumbass….I should know ;)

LimeyGeek on August 14, 2009 at 11:26 AM

but even they can be blamed on Bush insofar as Bush’s incompetence led to the election of a Democrat.

wow.. some peoples’ logic is just… i don’t think there’s a word for that kind of stupidity..

So if Person #1 overruns his one credit card.. and Person #2 overruns 4 credit cards, Person #1 is responsible for Person #2, because he didn’t convince the person #2 to not use those other credit cards?

DaSaintFan on August 14, 2009 at 11:31 AM

As a wise Latino with rich life experiences I can honestly say the Ronald Reagan was the conservative Barack Obama. The big difference was that Reagan always talked up his country not apologize for it. Like W he seemingly alienated the hell out of the Left with little or no effort. That alone is the proof you need that W was a great President in my book. You conservatives who still complain about immigration reform seem to forget that we stopped it. I dare suggest that it is coming up again soon. Steel yourselves.

bigtexmex on August 14, 2009 at 11:46 AM

No this is o’s mess now.He added to it and will continue to add to it.

The whole point is he does not want us out of debt,he wants this country totally dependent on him.

ohiobabe on August 14, 2009 at 11:51 AM

I attended a campaign rally in 1999 where both Bush and Chaney spoke. I came away form that event believing that the wrong man was at the top.

rt66jim on August 14, 2009 at 12:05 PM

Campaign rally in 1999? Cheney campaigning in 1999 when he wasn’t picked as the Veep nominee until Summer 2000?

JimWriter on August 14, 2009 at 7:48 PM

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6