CNN poll: Palin’s net favorable rating at -9
posted at 5:20 pm on August 12, 2009 by Allahpundit
The good news? Fox News and WaPo had her at -13 a few weeks ago. The bad news? Given the trend lines, it’s now obvious that her resignation has cost her some national support.
Thirty-nine percent of people questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Wednesday have a favorable opinion of the former Alaska governor and last year’s Republican vice presidential nominee. That’s down seven points from a poll conducted in May, and it’s also nine points lower than the 48 percent who now say they now view Palin unfavorably. Forty-three percent viewed Palin negatively in May.
“Most of that change has come among Republicans and conservatives,” says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. “GOP voters still like Palin — two-thirds continue to have a favorable view of her — but she is not as wildly popular among GOPers as she was in the spring, when eight in ten Republicans had a favorable view of her.”…
“A 39 percent favorable rating makes it that much tougher for Palin to become president should she decide to run in 2012. Her favorable rating is almost identical to the numbers that former vice president Dan Quayle got just after leaving office in 1993,” says Holland.
The margin of error for the Republican sample is 6.5 points but these numbers do jibe with what Fox News found: In that poll too, 67 percent of Republicans viewed her favorably. Most pols have their polling ups and downs over time (see, e.g., Hillary Clinton) but so far it’s been a downhill slide for the ‘Cuda. My sense is that the media/SNL caricature of her is so vivid in the public imagination that it’ll be unusually difficult for her to undo the bad impression; even the “death panel” comment might cost her, especially with fellow Republicans like Isakson and Lisa Murkowski spinning it as “nuts” and offensive. Exit question which I don’t think I’ve ever asked before: If she decides she’s momentarily too radioactive to win the nomination and bows out of 2012, whom do the Palinistas break for? I can’t see them being real thrilled with either Romney or Huck. Does some Palin-esque dark horse jump in once she decides not to run in hopes of snapping up her base? If so, er, who is it?
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 8 9 10 11 Next »
Idiocy on this level is impressive, in its own way.
ThereGoesTheNeighborhood on August 12, 2009 at 11:47 PM
You must understand that Spathi has a special fondness for idiocy and a passion for it on account of personal experience and heredity.
Luka on August 12, 2009 at 11:48 PM
If Obama REALLY becomes that bad, it’s up to every individual to ATTEMPT to get their money out of the U.S. or into precious metals that are hidden from the government or preserve wealth however they may.
FDR went hour to house to steal people’s gold. That would probably never happen again since the situation is totally different, but I still think it’s up to each individual to keep an eye on the Federal Government and know that they don’t have your best interests in mind.
I guess if you trust 5-termer Chris Dodd to take care of you. heh.
Lots of reason for skepticism.
Spathi on August 12, 2009 at 11:49 PM
I’ll tell you something, darwin said this guy was in left field, but I think he never left the locker room. He’s the skeeve that slinks around, sniffing the jock straps.
HornetSting on August 12, 2009 at 11:50 PM
“Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation … And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real…”
– Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
“I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”
– Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
“One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.”
– President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
“If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”
– President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
“We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction.”
– Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998
“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”
– Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
– Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
“Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.”
– Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”
– Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”
– Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”
– Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”
– Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
Joe Bloggs on August 12, 2009 at 11:52 PM
I don’t know about that but what I do know is Hot Air is about to retool into the anti-Spathi blog.
darwin on August 12, 2009 at 11:52 PM
Rookie.
Saltysam on August 12, 2009 at 11:53 PM
I think I finally understand.
darwin on August 12, 2009 at 11:53 PM
HornetSting on August 12, 2009 at 11:50 PM
poor soul needs put out of it’s misery.Or maybe regular doses of thorizene
flyoverboy on August 12, 2009 at 11:55 PM
Romoney care.
MSimon on August 12, 2009 at 11:55 PM
Joe Bloggs,
good point. I think Clinton contributed to the WMD hype actually. Clinton was pouring gasoline all over the situation, but it took scrub to light the match.
article: Iraq’s WMD myth: why Clinton is culpable. A new UN testimony, revealed to andrew cockburn, shows the WMD fiasco goes back to 1997
Spathi on August 12, 2009 at 11:55 PM
NFW
Say it isn’t so.
You think?
I think Woodrow Wilson may have been a
warmongerpacifist!Upstater85 on August 12, 2009 at 11:57 PM
Slick Willy stacked the deck against Saddam.
Saddam stopped cooperating with the inspectors because Clinton changed the terms so that there was no longer an eventual reward involved it. Hence this led to the 1998 bombing campaigns.
Spathi on August 12, 2009 at 11:59 PM
The military-industrial complex is the best thing left of America. This is a major driver of the technological advancements that have raised the standard of living to what we have now.
Undeclared wars are awesome, because we, as Americans, get to blow sh!t up.
Makes for great YouTube videos.
Ain’t freedom cool?
I love Abrams tanks, F-22 Raptors, Nimitz Class nuclear carriers, Stryker infantry vehicles, Amphibious Assault Battle Groups, A-10 Warthogs with that awesome 30mm vulcan cannon, 2,000lb JDAMS, B1B Lancers, MIRV ICBM’s, Ohio Class boomer subs, H-bombs, Apache attack choppers.
That is what America is all about.
Freedom to f*ck your sh!t up when you cross us, to show the rest they better not get to cocky, if they know what is good for them.
America, the arsenal of democracy.
Land of the Free, home of the brave.
America, your best friend in the world, or your worst f*cking nightmare.
I love the US Army.
I love the US Air Force.
I love the US Marine Corps.
I love the US Navy.
I love the US Coast Guard.
America, f*ck yeah!
Brian1972 on August 13, 2009 at 12:00 AM
B-b-but I thought the Donks were like less imperialist or something.
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:01 AM
Upstater85,
B-b-but..
Kind of like the republicans are anti-socialism or something: TARP, Medicare part D, the Housing Society, Social Security Expansion of 2005, increased military spending etc etc
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 12:03 AM
Posted again by popular request.
Sapwolf on August 13, 2009 at 12:05 AM
Uh, yeah.
I don’t get your point. Are you trying to save me from the Republican Party and show me the light? That might be a little hard. After all, I bow down and worship a statue of Lincoln with GOP bling hanging around the neck – EVERY NIGHT!
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:05 AM
Upstater85,
I was pointing out that the Democrats are kind of anti-Imperialist in the same respect that the GOP is anti-socialist. Also-known-as they’re not.
Both are imperialist and bother socialist. There may be differences in degree but I’m not a huge fan of either one right now.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 12:08 AM
I was hoping she left due to the state forcing her to take the “stimulus” money against her will. They took it right after she left. I was HOPING that was the reason. I would have bought that and called it a day.
HoneyWagon on August 13, 2009 at 12:09 AM
Well, you said
I don’t see how.
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:09 AM
Look at the faces. Romney can’t do it. Pawlenty can’t do it. Huck? Dream on.
Sapwolf on August 13, 2009 at 12:10 AM
Not to interfere but as a highly trained professional I must say that is not nearly strong enough in this case.
My recommend treatment plan would include:
1) An anti-psychotic drug protocol must be started immediately. The protocol should include but not be limited to the following medications.
A) Clozapine usually requires doses between 300 and 600 milligrams a day, but some patients require as much as 900 milligrams/day. Doses higher than 900 millgrams/day are not recommended except in extreme cases such as Spathi’s case.
B) Loxapine may be beneficial at doses of 60-100 milligrams/day, but may be used in doses as high as 250 mg/day if needed which it probably will be for Spathi.
C) Olanzapine doses vary with the exact level of the condition being treated. The usual maximum dose is 20 milligrams/day. For Spathi 40 milligrams/day.
D) Quetiapine may be dosed anywhere from 150-750 milligrams/day, depending on how well the patient responds. Spathi’s dose should probably be started at 750 milligrams/day.
If the Spathi fails to respond to the above protocol, it is recommended that the following rescue protocol be attempted.
1) Triturating up to very high doses of Donepezil, Galantamine and Rivastigmine.
2) Possible electroshock treatment. The judicial placement of several leaches on his head may also be beneficial.
3) Being placed in a small private room with a couple of Soldiers or Marines to council him may also be needed.
Even with this complete treatment plan, Spathi’s chances of making any meaningful recovery are unfortunately quite small, but we in my profession do have the responsibility to at least try.
Sigmund on August 13, 2009 at 12:12 AM
Upstater85,
Ya, Obama hasn’t changed much. He has supposedly ended Bush’s extraordinary rendition program. That’s a great step.
There is a gay civil rights march scheduled for 60 days from now in D.C.
Of gay rights activists want their rights, they will have to be out in the streets for it. So we’ll see how things go.
Not much has changed on wiretapping.
Not much has changed in terms of Iraq-Afghanistan, but McCain wanted to bomb Iran so at least we’re not attacking any new countries.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 12:14 AM
Uh… yeah, you let me know when he stops meddling. If anything the whole imperialism thing is just as bad as under Bush – now we are totally behind the UN (at least with Bush we weren’t).
What’s the march for? Letting gay people vote, participate in gov’t, &c?
Or maybe it’s one of those Gay Rights Marches where they demand the Gov’t recognize their marriages…
Shocking… The party of Wilson, FDR, and Kennedy has nothing to say about wiretapping.
Just because we aren’t attacking new countries doesn’t mean we aren’t interfering at the same level. See above. I’m sure you have no problem with us working with Pakistan, funding Gaza, and telling Honduras what they should do… /s
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:19 AM
The National Equality March is the one I’m thinking about.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 12:20 AM
Sigmund on August 13, 2009 at 12:12 AM
I like that.Could the electroshock be applied to the testes(I hope).As an ol jarhead I can guarentee that if placed in a room with some gyrenes he would be given an appropriate tune up that may put him closer to the realm of reason
flyoverboy on August 13, 2009 at 12:20 AM
Wait, are we funding Gaza?
It gets so confusing.
Perhaps indirectly.
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:21 AM
Well, I see nothing wrong with people in any group getting together to remind the gov’t that the Constitution was written for them too.
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:23 AM
Not true,
Obama has completely ended the extraordinary rendition program at least as has been reported so far. There could be something secret going on, but for right now it’s not.
Keep in mind Bush’s extraordinary rendition is worthy of a war crimes charge in itself beyond anything else Bush did. Extraordinary rendition IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. GET IT THROUGH YOUR HEAD.
Also what about Gaza? Clinton had changed the Bush policy and has recommended that there be no new settlements there.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 12:23 AM
Hmmm
Something seems strange about this.
Is this good for us?
I mean, who are we to tell Israel and the Palestinians to do?
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:25 AM
?
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:25 AM
Oh, I get it.
Obama is still less imperialistic.
Well, if it makes you sleep better at night.
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:26 AM
Upstater85,
Israel is to a degree anyway, a U.S. colony.
They rely on our funds to fund their government, their nuclear arsenal, and their military so it’s not that unreasonable considering the situation.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 12:26 AM
Meddle because we meddled
Gotcha
With this reasoning, Iraq IS most definitely a US colony and we should probably be there for the next 100+ years…
*vomit in mouth*
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM
Upstater85,
That fact that he’s not engaged in extraordinary rendition means A LOT in my book. Maybe you don’t care, but I do.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM
Also, since we hold up Europe with our military, I’d like them to start paying us for it…
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:28 AM
Upstater85,
Or defund the colonies.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 12:28 AM
I don’t know who’s more afraid of Palin-the Dems or the RINOs.
Dr. ZhivBlago on August 13, 2009 at 12:29 AM
Oh, I see you care.
You put different weighting on different types of forms of intervention … kind of like Bill Maher – hero of classical liberalism /s
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:29 AM
But we couldn’t do that. Clinton is making progress…
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:30 AM
Red Hot! The Cuda strikes again!
Sapwolf on August 13, 2009 at 12:30 AM
Nobody cares anymore we already obliterated another medium sized nations military, beyond that very few people actually care why we got into the war anymore- well okay people still care most people are tired of hearing the WMD stuff from both sides. As for the line between Imperialism, and Socialism the only real difference in todays world between the two is that Imperialism is willing to tell us it’s evil, socialism trickis with goodies. ANd for the record If hadn’t been for Israel destroying their nuke site in the 80′s we might be talking about this from a completley different perspective.
Now back to what this topic is REALLY ABOUT Sarah Palin.
I’d still consider her a contender but I’m betting on Romney for 2012.
Sierraniner on August 13, 2009 at 12:30 AM
Extraordinary rendition was a Bush program used to torture people.
I don’t support allowing our government to do that.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 12:31 AM
We know.
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:31 AM
Liz Cheney 2012
HellCat on August 13, 2009 at 12:32 AM
Leave AP something to post tomorrow…
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:34 AM
Is Spathi a redirection troll because it seems every time i check back in Spathi is driving the bus.
heshtesh on August 13, 2009 at 12:34 AM
yes!
I have an idea…
You folks that want to go off on social BS or carry on with the never ending banter between yourselves…get a room huh? or email yourselves? No sense carrying us all along to the hijack destination.
;o)
HoneyWagon on August 13, 2009 at 12:35 AM
I hope sarah runs, but not in 2012.I think she needs more time to put her base together and let her kids get a little older.I may be wrong but I doubt she will “fade away”.
flyoverboy on August 13, 2009 at 12:38 AM
The good thing about Sarah’s kids is I can’t see any of them being such failures as to turn out to become MegMac when they get older.
*Thank goodness*
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:39 AM
by the way–SCREW SPATHI
flyoverboy on August 13, 2009 at 12:40 AM
Sarah Strikes Back.
Played like a pro.
Gave enough to get them riled and draw a response from the big CaCahuna…
Then strikes back with a classic “ORLY?” followed with proof and citations.
Sorry people, you guys don’t deserve this woman. She is smarter than almost all of you harvard educated pundits and rinos.
You republicans, after the crap you all pulled post reagan really do not deserve Sarah…but you shoud thank your lucky stars you have her.
Imagine if all you had was Mehgan McCain…
BillaryMcBush on August 13, 2009 at 12:42 AM
Sarah is smacking Obama about again… He lies she comes back with the truth (and proof)
See Headlines…
CCRWM on August 13, 2009 at 12:43 AM
Not sure if anyone else noticed that the picture of the Messiah (standing in front of a giant American flag with a stupid looking smirk on his face) is directly opposite a picture of that great lady from Alaska (also in front of a giant American flag)?
One person just seems right standing there.
Here’s hoping she’ll be elected to represent those colors in 2012!
red winger on August 13, 2009 at 12:44 AM
Thank you, Sigmund. You’re point of view is always needed around here.
HornetSting on August 13, 2009 at 12:45 AM
No matter how many times you tell some people …
CCRWM on August 13, 2009 at 12:45 AM
I’m a afraid she will go the way of Gary Hart. They take her down (the way we did Gary), The R’s then give her all the attention and credibilty around eleaction time to get her base to vote for whoever they want, then toss her into the mud until next election. Do that a few times then she will just fade away.
I hope not. But it still ticks me off that Our own people took her down, really. Juan McCain will always be a little bag of fecal matter if you ask me. His Daughter apparently is a big bag.
HoneyWagon on August 13, 2009 at 12:45 AM
Spathi does seem to have some issues, but we’re currently in the testing and interview stage to flush those issues out. After that, and if Spathi continues in this manner, then we can flush Spathi out.
Loxodonta on August 13, 2009 at 12:46 AM
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 12:39 AM
I agree–seems to be some pretty decent kids. They certainly didn’t need to be treated as they were by the left and msm. That kind of bs deserves a bigtime, well thought out payback
flyoverboy on August 13, 2009 at 12:48 AM
Loxodonta on August 13, 2009 at 12:46 AM
Makes you wonder why wait for the inevitable?
heshtesh on August 13, 2009 at 12:49 AM
Wouldn’t be prudent.
These things have to be done delicately.
Loxodonta on August 13, 2009 at 12:51 AM
All very hypnotic as to Palin video, not sure about the boots but way hot, no more needs to be said. Well laid out, my favorite part was her last still. That shot alone touches the heart of America. She is in her full patriot glory, vintage harmony.
Palin is a warrior in blazing glory, she brings back the ebb of time to better days. Yeah, blah, blah but she works it and this is whom Obama fears a strong, determined, honorable woman who will crush him in the palm of her hand. Pre 1733 its a New Age, now lets go kick some azz!
stormen on August 13, 2009 at 12:52 AM
Love my girl!! Got to shake her hand when she came to Des Moines, took my 10 year old grandson too!
lovingmyUSA on August 13, 2009 at 12:54 AM
How quickly everyone writes her off.
True_King on August 13, 2009 at 12:54 AM
Wouldn’t be prudent.
These things have to be done delicately.
Loxodonta on August 13, 2009 at 12:51 AM
Just so happens i wear a pair of compassionate size 11 with big compassionate treads.
heshtesh on August 13, 2009 at 12:55 AM
Loxodonta,
ha! Well I already lasted longer than I do on the Redstate site.
They ban people right away.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 12:57 AM
Im not writing her off, as much as realizing we have some really Baaaaaaad people in power, and a really Baaaaad state of affairs right now in this United States Of Afrika America. I just don’t think she or anyone can take it down. It will take an act of God. Hopefully He (yes, I said He) will use…Her!
HoneyWagon on August 13, 2009 at 12:58 AM
What Obama not engaged in renditions?
Obama preserves renditions as counter-terrorism tool
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/feb/01/nation/na-rendition1
lovingmyUSA on August 13, 2009 at 12:58 AM
SECOND LOOK AT SARAH PALIN.
Mcguyver on August 13, 2009 at 12:59 AM
Too bad that was ghostwritten by someone else.
Your typical Palin-worshiper can’t follow all the links and sources anyways LOL
welcome_ghosts on August 13, 2009 at 1:00 AM
I think AP will ban ya pretty quick here too if you don’t roll the HA way.
HoneyWagon on August 13, 2009 at 1:01 AM
I have only stood behind,and campaigned for, two presidents. JFK and RR. If Sarah runs it will be #3
flyoverboy on August 13, 2009 at 1:02 AM
She is the only one that matters, right now. If someone I like steps up, may the primary go to the best conservative!
HornetSting on August 13, 2009 at 1:03 AM
There is a huge difference between rendition and extraordinary renditions.
The two topics aren’t even related but just have similar named so that article is kind of lost in semantics.
Renditions are what “The Bounty Hunter Dog” does when he goes to Mexico, and kidnaps someone in his trunk to bring him back to the U.S. to face a trial.
Extraordinary Renditions are the torture tours.
If Obama is really continuing the extraordinary renditions program and that is not some bogus crap, then his ass his grass in 2012.
The left wing base will abandon him in droves.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 1:06 AM
Obama doing extraordinary rendition= zero chance at reelection.
That’s an absolute game breaker among the civil liberties oriented left.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 1:07 AM
Ya ever notice how sexy Sarah Palin looks in a pair of Renditions?
HoneyWagon on August 13, 2009 at 1:09 AM
Different offenders have different agendas and use different tactics, so counter-trollism includes studying the perp, strategic planning, then effective tactical execution. In some cases, all that can be done is to correct misinformation and not feed them. In others, a good group stomping is best. And there are many other approaches in between, some quite nuanced. However, anyone willing to participate effectively in this effort is welcome.
Loxodonta on August 13, 2009 at 1:10 AM
And we care what the supposed civil liberties oriented left cares because…?
Focus on the Palin…
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 1:10 AM
Ya ever notice how sexy Sarah Palin looks in a pair of Renditions?
HoneyWagon on August 13, 2009 at 1:09 AM
Thank You.
heshtesh on August 13, 2009 at 1:10 AM
She set the trap and they walked right in.
Funny how she’s suppose to be so stupid, but as far as I’ve witnessed, she was the smartest one of both tickets.
Saltysam on August 13, 2009 at 1:11 AM
Ya ever notice how sexy Sarah Palin looks in a pair of Renditions?
HoneyWagon on August 13, 2009 at 1:09 AM
spathi wouldn’t have a clue–it may infringe on his rights
flyoverboy on August 13, 2009 at 1:11 AM
Good god, is that little puddle of enema leavings still going? Hey anarchist, move along. Your picture of ruthless murderer Jules Bonnot needs more loving attention.
MadisonConservative on August 13, 2009 at 1:11 AM
Your typical Palin-worshiper can’t follow all the links and sources anyways LOL
stormen on August 13, 2009 at 1:11 AM
This Greg Miller guy at the LATimes is lost in translation.
Obama’s campaign official campaign pledge was to keep renditions (not controversial) but do away with extraordinary renditions.
So since he can’t keep the terms straight (nor is he addressing the terminology), I’m not going to draw any conclusions yet. I’ve seen a lot of bogus stories in the past so….take a deep breath on this LATimes sotry.
However, there will be absolute hell to pay if Obama is torturing people.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 1:12 AM
God. (Big “G”)
HoneyWagon on August 13, 2009 at 1:13 AM
For future trolling,
Palin-worshiper = Palinista.
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 1:13 AM
It realized the left didn’t like to hear him blabbering on either…
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 1:14 AM
The civil liberties oriented left ended in the late 19th century.
Ease back on the keyboard throttle and take a look out your window.
Saltysam on August 13, 2009 at 1:15 AM
He didn’t figure that out when Huff-N-Puff banned him…
Upstater85 on August 13, 2009 at 1:16 AM
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Any poll which uses “adults” is useless. It includes non-voters, including those who aren’t even registered.
Rasmussen and Public Policy Polling are who I trust, and the latter will be posting national favourables for ‘Cuda soon.
Damian G. on August 13, 2009 at 1:22 AM
The only “Poll” I will ever believe in is my Flag Pole. All the others be dammed.
HoneyWagon on August 13, 2009 at 1:28 AM
As opposed to Dreams from my Father which was ghost written by Bill Ayers?
BillaryMcBush on August 13, 2009 at 1:30 AM
For future trolling,
Palin-worshiper = Palinista.
I’m touched over your concern, tried to balance the diet.
stormen on August 13, 2009 at 1:31 AM
AMEN
flyoverboy on August 13, 2009 at 1:34 AM
No faith. Therefore, god is a noun, as in “the gods”.
MadisonConservative on August 13, 2009 at 1:38 AM
Well said, Honey.
HornetSting on August 13, 2009 at 1:39 AM
fify
jhffmn on August 13, 2009 at 1:40 AM
Clinton did “rendition” not “extraordinary rendition
It is alleged that the CIA runs a secret global abduction and internment operation of suspected terrorists, known as “extraordinary rendition”, which since 2001 has captured about 3,000 people and transported them around the world. Dr Rice will give a robust defence of America’s actions in response to terrorism. She will tell European leaders that the US does not fly prisoners around the world to be tortured, and that it has respected the sovereignty of all the countries that it has dealt with. It has been alleged that torture has been employed with the knowledge or acquiescence of the United States (President G.Bush)and United Kingdom (PM Tony Blair)(a transfer of anyone to anywhere for the purpose of torture is a violation of U.S. law). Condoleezza Rice, while United States Secretary of State, stated in an April 2006 radio interview that the United States does not transfer people to places where it is known they will be tortured.[1][2][3]
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 1:43 AM
Also know as the U.S.’s Torture by proxy program.
Spathi on August 13, 2009 at 1:44 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 8 9 10 11 Next »