The obligatory “Meghan McCain dumps on Michelle” post
posted at 8:30 pm on August 11, 2009 by Allahpundit
I was going to save this for quote of the day but the boss deserves a defense.
So Michelle Malkin successfully rounds out the trifecta of extreme female conservative pundits, following Laura Ingraham and Ann Coulter, who believe that I, and Republicans like me, need to shut up and get out of the party. Is this surprising? Not really, given my father’s complicated history with the extreme right of the GOP. But what confuses me is this: Malkin recently posted an item on her blog about how “drowning out opposing views is simply un-American.”…
I don’t know exactly what about me threatens them so much, other than that people are listening to me. Malkin has the No. 1 book on The New York Times bestseller hardcover nonfiction list, but I have nearly twice as many Twitter followers as she does. And trust me, Twitter is more of an indication of where young people are than books published by the hyper-conservative publisher Regnery—which will be bringing you Carrie Prejean’s new book and published one of Ann Coulter’s.
There is a place for the far right in this party, Malkin included, and I respect their right to be heard. But the Republican Party will continue to lose elections unless we start reaching out in a more effective way to people my age and to moderates. Barack Obama won the last election on the slogan “Yes We Can,” and there is no reason why Republicans can’t go forth and win elections with equally positive messages. We will not get anywhere by continuing to sell hate and fear. Of course, there is always going to be a fraction of the GOP that is going to respond to that, but at some point we have to start facing the reality that hate and fear will only get us so far. Those emotions are not sources for inspiration of joining anything, let alone supporting a political party.
Laying aside (a) the glaring error of imputing Pelosi’s quote about un-American activity to Michelle, who was quoting her ironically, (b) the arbitrary assumption that Twitter followers are a fair gauge of influence among younger voters, and (c) the lingering question of why MegMac would want to be part of any party that contains a wing she perceives as being devoted to “hate and fear,” this whole line of attack demonstrates how fundamentally she misunderstands why so many “far right” Republicans don’t like her. As I think I’ve said before, McCain’s really no further towards the center than I am; she supports gay marriage, as do I, and she’s conventional on most other core conservative issues (guns, abortion, religion). And yet the base hates her while they, errrrr, tolerate me. Why is that? If the “old guard” of right-wingers is so retrograde, how does a wayward atheist like me end up co-blogging at one of the biggest righty blogs in America? Simple answer: I spend most of my time challenging the left while Meggie Mac spends hers challenging the right, so I have a certain baseline credibility on our side that she has yet to establish. And why would anyone listen to criticism of their own side from someone who doesn’t (yet) have credibility? I tried to explain that to her, both here and on Twitter, but the message simply hasn’t taken — the proof of which is the fact that she’s now tangled with Coulter, Ingraham, and the boss in high-profile fashion and has yet to tangle (as far as I know) with anyone of similar prominence on the left. All the vitriol spilled this week by the Democrats about health-care protesters, all the demagoguery directed at her fellow conservatives, and the thing that sticks in her craw the most is … Michelle taking a one-line shot at her during a public chat?
Which reminds me: I can’t find the transcript, but from what I can recall, MM didn’t say she should leave the party or even that she should shut up. What she said was that Meghan was someone she’d like to hear “less” from, i.e. that she’s overexposed. I leave you to judge whether she’s right. Exit question: If Michelle’s so “far right” and all about “drowning out” voices that sometimes disagree her, how’d Ed and I last this long at Hot Air?
Update: Predictably, Meghan’s column is the number-one story on MSNBC’s hour of DNC propaganda power tonight.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
catlady on August 11, 2009 at 10:20 PM
Not during the election, He showed some class.
He is what came out of the primaries. Your problem is with the voters.
“RINO” is a dnc weasel word designed to split the GOP and elect democrats. It was Pelosi’s dream come true when republicans started calling each other RINO’s.
Enough was going wrong on it’s own, it didn’t need any help to go wronger.
Boxy_Brown on August 11, 2009 at 10:29 PM
You just made the list, buddy.
Boxy_Brown on August 11, 2009 at 10:31 PM
Isn’t Tila Tequila the most popular MySpace chick with millions of “friends” and isn’t Ashton Kutcher king of the twits? And this is comparable to a New York Times Bestseller?
Marcus on August 11, 2009 at 10:31 PM
So by MegMac standards, she’s like totally a bottom when it comes to Tila…
Upstater85 on August 11, 2009 at 10:32 PM
Also, I don’t like nobody touching me. Now, any of you homos touch me, and I’ll kill ya.
jaime on August 11, 2009 at 10:33 PM
One of these guys may save your life one day.
Lanceman on August 11, 2009 at 10:34 PM
F. Leghorn does it again going after Meggie M.:
“She’s like Paul Revere’s Ride,…a little lite in the belfry.”
Sapwolf on August 11, 2009 at 10:35 PM
But then again, maybe we won’t.
.
‘nite..
Boxy_Brown on August 11, 2009 at 10:36 PM
The Boss deserves a defense against Meghan?
What? Is Meghan a force to be reckoned with? Since when? She’s a twit who, at best, could inspire a whole new wave of blond jokes.
Since when does Michelle need a defense against this moron, who is in the limelight ONLY because the MSM can take advantage of her?
Danzo on August 11, 2009 at 10:37 PM
Sorry, Boxy_Brown, but Rush wrongly and dumbly ran anti-McCain parodies right up to the 2008 Election Day. Rush still runs anti-McCain paraodies today, even though John McCain has one of the most conservative voting records in the U.S. Senate this year and has been speaking out visibly in opposition to Obama. Rush needs to cut it out and spend that valuable air time attacking Obama, the Democrats and the state controlled media.
Phil Byler on August 11, 2009 at 10:38 PM
Hey, I never asked you, but are you one of Meggy’s followers?
Upstater85 on August 11, 2009 at 10:38 PM
I can see how that would confuse you, dear. The difference is between union thugs being paid to “drown out” (or “punch out”) opposing views, and someone expressing a different opinion than you, and making shitloads of money for it because people want to hear what she has to say. That’s it in a nutshell, hon.
Let me know if I can clarify that for you.
drunyan8315 on August 11, 2009 at 10:40 PM
I don’t know WHY we have to see the same picture of Meghan from Allah time after time after time, when she wore her best bedspread to the Correspondent’s dinner in DC:
http://www3.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Capitol+File+Hosts+White+House+Correspondents+KdyXolLHKvUl.jpg
Marcus on August 11, 2009 at 10:42 PM
I guess we know who the f*ck she is now…god, what a dog.
AUINSC on August 11, 2009 at 10:43 PM
Because it is ALWAYS about her. That is what I find so irritating about her. If you follow her tweets…they are usually links back to stuff about her.
She claims to be the new face of the Republican party, but spends all her time talking about herself…which is fine, I guess. But you can’t claim to be the “new voice” of the party and then use that voice to talk about how much you love sex, how super-fantastic your new edgy tattoo is, what you should wear on your date that has promise, how you are the only person you know who has purple walls and snake skin tables, how you love men with a sleeve of tattoos, how you drink beer and whiskey, how you have kissed a girl (cuz your edgy), how biker guys are just, like, the coolest, like ya know, how you don’t give a f*ck about michelle malkin, and on and on and on. AP makes very valid points about Meghan claiming to support Republicans but then using her voice to criticize MM, when she could be helping fellow Republicans get a decent health care bill. But I think she can’t help herself.
If she wants to spend her time talking about herself and how cool and edgy she is – fine. But if she wants to be the “face of the party” she is going to have to come up with something of substance.
And it would be nice if she could show a little class while she is at it.
ramrants on August 11, 2009 at 10:44 PM
I’m puddling…
*Huhhhhh huhhhh huhhh…*
Upstater85 on August 11, 2009 at 10:44 PM
One thing that would help is for all to accept that in 2008 there was a combinaiton of factors that spelled defeat: (i) a financial crisis that caused economic uncertainties that historically have favored Democrats and did in 2008 (McCain had gone ahead in September in the polls, but then the financial “crisis” hit); (ii) a Bush Administration bailout that muddied the waters of the difference between the parties on economics and diluted the largely Reaganesque message on the campaign trail delivered by the McCain-Palin ticket; (iii) Bush unpopularity, which was unfair but which was a factor; (iv) the Obama money that paid for what was false political advertising (how do you win against a 7 to 1 money advantage?); (v) the media bias that operated day in, day out as a propaganda machine for Obama; and (vi) demographic changes (if the country had the same demographic make up as 1992 and groups voted in the same percentage McCain-Obama as they did in 2008, McCain would have won). Had more foreign problems arose and reminded everyone of McCain’s strengths in foreign policy, military matters and national security, then McCain would have been elected despite everything.
The point is that today, we cannot comfort ourselves with easy formulas, but rather confront all that went wrong in 2008. To overcome a mainstream media bias, Leftist money fueling Leftist propaganda and causes, ACORN operatives, and demographic changes are favoring Democrats, just talking conservative principles won’t be enough. Among other things, Republicans need to reconnect with the people at such gatherings as TEA parties and Town Hall meetings and bring a message applied to the specific circumstances of American lives and explain how Democrat multi-trillion dollar deficit spending and Big Government hurts people in their every day lives.
Phil Byler on August 11, 2009 at 10:45 PM
Also, I hope AP isn’t in too much despair. Apparently, she has “unfollowed” him on Twitter.
Which I would like to point out…her maturity is also a HUGE problem.
ramrants on August 11, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Her maturity is the smallest part of her body… well, except for her brain cell.
Upstater85 on August 11, 2009 at 10:48 PM
I am always late to the party here, ah well, better late than never!
I wholeheartedly agree with Michelle M. here. Every single time I hear about about Megan McCain, it’s something she’s said that’s being screeched on left wing media outlets with such glee it’s sickening. If Miss McCain is truly a Republican who wants to help her party she needs to stop giving the left talking points and ammo to use against us. She’s really not helping.
4shoes on August 11, 2009 at 10:48 PM
We’d be fighting the amnesty fight all over again.
csdeven on August 11, 2009 at 10:51 PM
And perhaps some version of McCainCare – the progressive he is and all.
We just wouldn’t fight as hard, because ya know, he’s not “that bad.”
Upstater85 on August 11, 2009 at 10:52 PM
Umm, how to put this?
Oh.
Grow up.
That probably what she needs to hear.
mmmm, K?
juanito on August 11, 2009 at 10:56 PM
I wouldn’t call Michelle extreme and/or an advocate of “fear and hate,” that’s rather exaggerated. I consider myself more of a moderate and don’t see why I would go to this site if it actually represented that. Though I do disagree with Michelle, Allahpundit, and Ed Morrissey time to time, I view their differing beliefs as another side of the political debate.
Let me put it this way, Meghan McCain isn’t helping “us moderates.” Meghan McCain is annoying, about as annoying as Sean Hannity and Michael Moore.*
*Did I confuse you? Good.
DanStark on August 11, 2009 at 10:59 PM
Fat, rich and stupid. What’s not for The View to love?
sloopy on August 11, 2009 at 11:00 PM
Oh no she didn’t!
Rightwingguy on August 11, 2009 at 11:01 PM
Her and Sheri would be like twins.
Upstater85 on August 11, 2009 at 11:01 PM
THE APPLE DOESNT FALL FAR FROM THE TREE JOHN AND DAUGHTER CLOSET DEMOCRATS
rone5847 on August 11, 2009 at 11:01 PM
Why is Meghan McCain even newsworthy? She evidently has led a pretty sheltered life and appears to be a little limited in depth of what she knows, but, she is pretty good at dishing out criticisms of Conservatives so she can pal around with her MSNBC buddies, though. What price one pays to get on TV so they can have a few minutes of fame and sell a few books….!
DL13 on August 11, 2009 at 11:02 PM
I don’t find it the slightest bit strange that Allahpundit and Michelle Malkin and Ed Morrissey can function quite happily under the same general ideological umbrella. Of course there are individual differences, and no lockstep agreement on every issue. Obviously Michelle has no problem with it and actively encourages (and employs!) such diversity of thought.
Meghan McCain is trolling for attention and for someone to blame when she (no surprise) decides to leave the Republican party. She’s picked the wrong target in Michelle Malkin.
Gilda on August 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM
Ms.McCain is young. Shes smart but lacks wisdom. That will come with age( I hope). She has been exposed enough to the political class to know that the only way she will get any attention at all is by bashing conservatives(or the far right in her mind). Its not going to click until she feels it personally,which she really hasnt.
She is not nor will she ever be representative of the party. What she doesnt get is she is trying to be and trying to convince others that she is. We are a party of individualists. No one can represent us. But our chosen representative must exhibit core principles. One of those principles is respect for the individual.
Ms.McCain this is not all about you sweety. You can be a part of, but not the whole of. Say what you will about policies, create new ideas and think outside of the box -but dont bash others in our party that have done way more good for it than you could ever hope to do for it to get attention. Along with great fame there is great responsibility. If you want to be taken seriously then you must build a following based on credibility. Anything less than that is irresponsible.
canditaylor68 on August 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM
I say we beat MegaMac at her own game. If you’re not already following Michelle on Twitter, go now and follow her. It will destroy the little, er, big twit.
silenced majority on August 11, 2009 at 11:07 PM
Allah, I think you hit the nail on the head. Before a message can be accepted, you have to establish source credibility. I think for most of us, she simply isn’t credible. For me, I think you and Ed as well as Michelle “The Boss” Malkin have earned your spurs. She seems (at least to me) to have dropped out of nowhere after the general election and seems (to me at least)to be trying to use her last name as credibility. It doesn’t work that way. She is earning credibility by her work as a blogger and as someone involved in political issues, but she hasn’t gotten there yet. It’s fine she disagrees with Michelle. You can disagree with anyone in the Republican party and still be conservative. I think the problem we are having though is that we see her as someone who doesn’t know what she is talking about attacking everyone left right and center who don’t fit into her nice happy vision of the Republican party.
…whew! That was a lot of writing!
Rightwingguy on August 11, 2009 at 11:07 PM
Oh and btw, Ms McCain? A little modesty and humility would help you a lot. Just a suggestion….
Rightwingguy on August 11, 2009 at 11:13 PM
I’d rather be in a party with Mitch McConnell, Mary Matalin, Mickey Mantle, Marilyn Monroe, Marilyn Manson, Moms Mabley, Marshall Mathers, Marlee Matlin, Mancow Muller, Mandy Moore, Mike Myers, Megan Mullally, Matthew McConaughey, Maureen McCormick, Malcolm McDowell, Melissa Manchester, Morgan Mason, Marjorie Main or Martin Mull than Meghan McCain — but not Michael Moore.
AP needs to start hanging out in a different part of the alphabet. Just sayin’.
Terrie on August 11, 2009 at 11:14 PM
That’d be one interesting party.
Rightwingguy on August 11, 2009 at 11:17 PM
Meghan McCain never had an original thought, it is all daddy.
The Boss should ignore her, they are two different leagues altogether. Meghan is just trying to steal some attention. Her and daddy should go over to the other side they keep pandering to.
Ed Laskie on August 11, 2009 at 11:18 PM
This fat blonde pig is nowhere near being in the same league as someone like MM, let alone any other thinking woman of conservative bent.
First off, this pile of puke isn’t a conservative. She’s just a self important nothing. A daughter of a flatulent old failure that tried to sell himself as everything for everyone and failed failed failed.
I wish I could see Meg in person, just so I could shove a big mac in that huge idiotic pie hole of hers. It’d shut her up for all of 10 seconds at least, it’d be worth it.
Spiritk9 on August 11, 2009 at 11:27 PM
She has really been full of herself since her Numa Numa vid went viral.
ronsfi on August 11, 2009 at 11:28 PM
Extreme stupidity.
Connie on August 11, 2009 at 11:30 PM
oh yeah….
and having lots and lots of twitter followers doesn’t even qualify a person as being interesting. It only takes a twit to get tweeted.
Sorry AP, I know you love that site. I think it’s pretty damned useless really.
Spiritk9 on August 11, 2009 at 11:30 PM
She has single-handedly destroyed her father’s credibility. (Not that he had any to begin with).
Connie on August 11, 2009 at 11:31 PM
She will not take on anybody on the left because that would be against her career objective. a talk show on MSNBC or at least no analyst.
There is no money in slamming the left. Just ask Kathleen Parker and David Brooks. If it was not for there high profile insults to certain people the left hates we would not know there name.
kangjie on August 11, 2009 at 11:33 PM
Please, can we just stop covering this inane twit. She’s nothing, just ignore her.
scullymj on August 11, 2009 at 11:34 PM
http://mobyrebuttal.blogspot.com/2005/07/john-mccain.html
“Where did the financing to get McCain-Feingold passed come from you ask?
“The vast majority of this money — $123 million, 88 percent of the total — came from just eight liberal foundations.
These foundations were: the Pew Charitable Trusts ($40.1 million), the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy ($17.6 million), the Carnegie Corporation of New York ($14.1 million), the Joyce Foundation ($13.5 million), George Soros’ Open Society Institute ($12.6 million), the Jerome Kohlberg Trust ($11.3 million), the Ford Foundation ($8.8 million) and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation ($5.2 million).”"
Ford Foundation may as well be called the “Open Borders Coalition.”
Connie on August 11, 2009 at 11:37 PM
Sorry Allahpundit, I think you are way off base on why you haven’t been shunned by the rest of the right.
When you write about a topic you give an actual analysis of the subject, offering us readers, a chance to disagree, but understand how you came to the conclusion. Case in point: Your atheist beliefs. You do many posts on the subject but in a respectful way. (Unlike some bloggers that kick people off their Blog.)
Meghan offers her opinion, with faulty logic or misquoted facts. She frequently will believe any left talking point and then try to justify her position. As an American she has the right to say anything she wants. If she does it in public fourm, she should expect some blowback.
BigRichardSmall on August 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM
Allah:
I have only one question but is of great importance: Who has more twitter followers, you or Geraldo?
paulsur on August 11, 2009 at 11:44 PM
Nail on the head.
True_King on August 11, 2009 at 11:46 PM
I do have to say that I’m a bit dismayed by the comments here on Meghan McCain’s appearance.
What she looks like is not the issue. What she thinks, and publicly expresses, is. Content of character and all that.
Gilda on August 11, 2009 at 11:47 PM
SOmeone, anyone…shove a C4 packed twinkie in her pie hole and send her out to play in traffic.
BillaryMcBush on August 11, 2009 at 11:48 PM
McAmnestyCare……you get to come here for free but you have to leave a kidney at the border post office.
csdeven on August 11, 2009 at 11:50 PM
McShamnesty’s daughter is so fat, she has to iron her pants in the driveway.
csdeven on August 11, 2009 at 11:51 PM
In Meghans unbelieving soul “Hate & Fear” is what she experiences when confronted with hard truth. In her narrow little life if its not feel-good emotionalism, she wants no part of it. How does the song go?: “toss me in the shallow water before I go too deep”. Something like that. Such a tragedy. Great little gal, too. Spirited little philly. Ha!
Darvin Dowdy
Darvin Dowdy on August 11, 2009 at 11:57 PM
If she’s the new “face” of the Party, do you suppose that the Party could tone down the makeup just a bit.
TugboatPhil on August 12, 2009 at 12:00 AM
Nancy Pelosi was right.
There is Republican Astroturf:
Meghan McCain
Astroturfing her own party
BDU-33 on August 12, 2009 at 12:01 AM
As a lifelong thin person I have to admit I’ve occasionally laughed at some fat jokes. But physical appearance is not what’s at issue here and if that’s all you got, then… you ain’t got nothin.’
Gilda on August 12, 2009 at 12:02 AM
Mehgan McCain is a moron.
That is all.
BillaryMcBush on August 12, 2009 at 12:12 AM
OK. She’s a fat idiot. There. Something for everyone.
Ronnie on August 12, 2009 at 12:17 AM
Congratulations to Michelle. Insinuating that Meghan McCain is overexposed has to qualify as the understatement of the year, if not the century.
Meghan McCain should be thankful Michelle went so easy on her
Very droll. I was tired of this empty-headed attention whore about two minutes after she popped onto the scene. She should drop all pretense and just keep screaming “Look at me, Look at Me, Look at me” like a damn four year old.
Anyone who calls Michelle Malkin “far right” deserves immediate, decisive, and permanent censure. That kind of talk is so destructive-having someone who is supposedly a Republican denounce a mainstream conservative as “far right” plays into the hands of the far left, by making it that much easier to marginalize all of us. That really sucks.
Why don’t the Democrats have to deal with this kind of crap? How come you don’t have Chelsea Clinton, or Mondale’s kid, running down Olbermann, or something like that. I’m getting really sick of this crap.
And the her boast regarding her sillyassed “Twitter Followers” has to qualify as the single most inane and pathetic comment I’ve ever seen from a public figure. I really have to wonder about someone who has nothing better to do with their life than follow a non-entity like Meghan McCain on Twitter. Yikes, that’s scary.
Dreadnought on August 12, 2009 at 12:24 AM
“…but I have nearly twice as many Twitter followers as she does.”
Ha ha!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
Oh wait, I think she seriously believes having more “followers” gives her more credibility. Sad.
KS Rex on August 12, 2009 at 12:24 AM
…and Britney Spears also has an opinion…..next…
Ozprey on August 12, 2009 at 12:25 AM
O gosh Allah when will you just go away
CapitalistObserver on August 12, 2009 at 12:25 AM
I’m 25, probably have similar positions to some social issues as MegMac, but I would never attack other members of the GOP.
If Meggie Mac was intelligent, at all, she would realize that the GOP needs to stick together if we are ever going to win another national election. Demonizing sects of the party is not the way to do it.
MeggieMac should stick to talking about her outfits for dates and the motorcycles she is buying with Mommys money.
And I follow her on twitter, but I don’t think it is an indication of her influence. Clearly.
marmaran on August 12, 2009 at 12:27 AM
Deleting my own too truthful post.
Connie on August 12, 2009 at 12:29 AM
Bingo. The kind of crap McCain engages in all the time only helps the left in their attempt to marginalize what should be, mainstream conservative ideas. She doesn’t do anything to attract middle-of-the-roaders or young people-she only acts to confirm what their lefty friends tell them.
Dreadnought on August 12, 2009 at 12:34 AM
MegMac should be the first to go on the mandatory Obama Diet… Cigarettes and Arugula.
Upstater85 on August 12, 2009 at 12:51 AM
It sounds like Megan McCain did not even read the article that Michelle Malkin wrote on her blog regarding Pelosi’s comments re Unamericanism.
For me, Michelle Malkin has a stronger track record of accuracy, depth, consistency, conservatism, and excellent communication skills.
Megan McCain, as Allah Pundit pointed out, takes shots as Conservatives, while I do not see or hear much, if anything, from her opposing leftists/fifth columnists/liberals/Democrats.
Why does Megan McCain waste her time attacking “her own” while not attacking the “enemy?”
Is she working for brownie points before she does a Arlen Specter?
William2006 on August 12, 2009 at 12:55 AM
MegMac is distrusted because in addition to always taking swings at the right, she’s also a useful idiot for getting out the DNC propaganda that conservatism doesn’t appeal to young people.
I know you don’t read this Meg, nor care who I am:
Do yourself a favor and stay holed up in your rich daddy’s basement in one of his many houses. Every time you speak you manage to engage in the most vile form of narcissistic self-indulgence. You do more damage than you can ever possibly know by combining complete ignorance and useful idiocy with an annoying tendency to miss the big picture.
I am nothing like you, yet I am the same age as you, possibly younger. Instead of opening your sanctified orifice and talking about how much the “far right” ticks you off, why don’t you speak constructively about conservatism itself to the age demographic you claim to represent?
Otherwise you will remain the gift that keeps on giving to the very people who hate you and everything you, your father, and your grandfather stand for.
BKennedy on August 12, 2009 at 12:59 AM
http://mtpundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/motivator-meghan-mccain-duct-tape.jpg
Rusty Shackleford on August 12, 2009 at 1:06 AM
http://mtpundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/meghan-mccain-attention-whore.jpg
Rusty Shackleford on August 12, 2009 at 1:07 AM
Allapundit, all anyone ever hears from Meghan McCain is; “Mooo, oink, hee-haw, Mooo, oink, hee-haw.
Besides, your boss is drop-dead pretty and Meghan McCain….well, I grew up on a horse farm so she looks VERY familiar, you might check her teeth to determine her age.
nelsonknows on August 12, 2009 at 1:30 AM
Ramrants pretty much has it on the money for mine. Now that I think about it, she is more about “how the party should be perceived” than anything else. She’s no policy wonk by any means. I haven’t even seen the slightest from her policy wise. Which isn’t in and of itself bad. Most people view politicis through the prism of personalities and perception rather than policy. MegMc just has a big megaphone.
PunditFight on August 12, 2009 at 1:42 AM
Thanks for the link. Good write up.
coyoterex on August 12, 2009 at 1:42 AM
You are smart. She is stupid.
blink on August 12, 2009 at 1:57 AM
Dear Allahpundit: thanks for posting this. It was needed. I believe Michelle Malkin is a very, very smart woman who has put together a very effective blogging team here.
Frankly, ever time I’ve read anything by Meghan McCain, I’ve never found it to be of any depth or containing any significant insight. So, I rarely read her.
Based on what I’ve read about this issue, Michelle beats Meghan on facts, poise, intelligence, and humor. However, to give credit where it’s due, Meghan certainly is greatly superior to Michelle on hissy fits, tantrums, wishful thinking, illogical reasoning, and several other other ugly characteristics of adolescent self-indulgence.
As to you, you are certainly hated by some and tolerated by other conservative, but you do have your own mini Facebook Fan Club. Of course, your Fan Club is primarily used to heap abuse on you. But it’s done with affection. What I mean by this is that we enjoy abusing you. So please, stop putting yourself down. That’s our job! Thanks.
Loxodonta on August 12, 2009 at 2:39 AM
She attacks people versus their message, liberal style.
Speakup on August 12, 2009 at 2:52 AM
I thought I saw her in La Jolla once, but it turned out to be a harbor seal.
BDavis on August 12, 2009 at 2:53 AM
how can she comments on political views when she doesn’t even know that the un-american comment comes from Pelosi not MM, gee…
sun on August 12, 2009 at 2:56 AM
ROTFLMAO.
I love rippin’ on Allah, but I like him too, its weird.
Geochelone on August 12, 2009 at 4:00 AM
Way back when I could understand APs crush on Kirsten Powers, but Meghan McCain?… [shaking head] just can’t see it.
BadBrad on August 12, 2009 at 6:57 AM
That too…
BadBrad on August 12, 2009 at 7:00 AM
Megahan Mc Cain has a point.We might need her to pick up a small portion of the shallow brainless twit contingent that we could get to vote GOP. Of course almost all shallow brainless twits will stick with their donkey party.
Jeff from WI on August 12, 2009 at 7:04 AM
THat’s terrible! Leave McCanckle alone!
Jeff from WI on August 12, 2009 at 7:08 AM
Nannie nannie pooh pooh
Alden Pyle on August 12, 2009 at 7:16 AM
typical MO of MSDNC….
cmsinaz on August 12, 2009 at 7:30 AM
“Of course, there is always going to be a fraction of the GOP”
Fraction?
Dumbass.
LtE126 on August 12, 2009 at 7:32 AM
didn’t she star in that movie ‘CLUELESS’?
/sarc
cmsinaz on August 12, 2009 at 7:35 AM
Where did this stupid little whore get the idea that her views were relevant? She is not a spokesperson for the GOP. She wasn’t even a registered Republican until last year! And, if she speaks for “her generation” then things are looking grim for the future of America.
P.S. Re-read her insane rant. She uses “I” almost as much as the narcissitic bastard in the White House.
highhopes on August 12, 2009 at 7:37 AM
Meggy is an invertebrate which was passed down to her from her dad. AP is an invertebrate who has yet to prove his existence.
The two of them should not meet.
As for the exit question, you wouldn’t have lasted two days if I was your boss. Get used to it.
TwinkietheKid on August 12, 2009 at 7:39 AM
There is no money in slamming the left. Just ask Kathleen Parker and David Brooks. If it was not for there high profile insults to certain people the left hates we would not know there name.
kangjie on August 11, 2009 at 11:33 PM
I am waiting to hear Kirsten Powerless rip the Dems for their (insert any of 25,000 things here)and travel around to such venues as MSNBC preaching the message from within the lefty ranks. And, by the way, has Princess McCain ever noticed how kind the lefties are when Juan McLame varies from their line? The latest lambasting was over Juan’s opposition to Sodamanure’s confirmation.
Lefties hate too. They just pick targets that have been approved by the pop culture. Rich people, white people, America lovers, traditionalists…conservatives of all colors…
IlikedAUH2O on August 12, 2009 at 7:41 AM
It takes more than a prominent family name to give one instant credibility (unless that name is Kennedy). What has Meghan McCain done other than to attack the right “fraction” of the party? Why is her message of becoming Democrat-lite any more valid now than when her left-of-center father failed to win on that message 9 months ago? Fact of the matter is Meghan McCain and her social views like legitimizing sodomy are out of synch with the vast center of the party- not the other way around. And no matter how much she tries to present herself as a “new voice” she’s really bleating stale rhetoric left over from the unforgivable failure that put her daddy at the top of a Presidential ticket.
highhopes on August 12, 2009 at 7:46 AM
Ms. McCain has nothing of value to add to a conversation, so why does Hot Air keep giving her a podium?
Does one of the editors here have a thing for cute, outspoken morons?
zoyclem on August 12, 2009 at 7:48 AM
You know what’s an even better measure of your influence? The number of people willing to pay to read you. Let’s see…MeggieMac has Tina Brown, and….. Ok, so she’s got Tina Brown.
Pablo on August 12, 2009 at 7:56 AM
Special Olympians need help getting on the world stage I guess…
IntheNet on August 12, 2009 at 7:57 AM
funny you should ask….
you just defined her entire career I suspect….
her Jenny Craig Jihad is to try to pull the party to dear old Queeg’s vision as some sort of oddball battle to show that what lost was the right GOP but with the wrong people behind her dear old Dad….
what lost was Juan Queeg refusing to go for the throat….stockholm syndrome actually.
sven10077 on August 12, 2009 at 7:58 AM
No one would be reading your comment if you ran this place. Deal.
Pablo on August 12, 2009 at 7:59 AM
We tolerate you? Does that mean we can vote you off the island and we don’t know it?
peacenprosperity on August 12, 2009 at 8:03 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »