Repeat in history…big businesses supported Hitler as well…thinking the government would make them rich, it was too late when the Nazis took power who then took over these same businesses.
Conservative Voice on August 10, 2009 at 1:48 PM

Fortunately, there are still a large block of voters who remember some crucial European history. Maybe enough not to repeat it?

Normally, I would say that we should look for the good in all people when it comes to someone saying something like this.

But in this case……. um……. I can’t find anything.

Nope. I’d safely say his soul is bought and paid for (with interest) by Lucifer.

Chaz706 on August 10, 2009 at 3:34 PM

something good in Soros would weigh about 168gr.

jarhead0311 on August 10, 2009 at 7:14 PM

Leave it to the marines to cut to the chase! Semper Fi!

The laugh was so good I won’t charge you for the new monitor.

Woody

If he plans on buying up every health insurance entity in this country, well then we have a problem.
sherry on August 10, 2009 at 2:18 PM

This is not how Soros plays the game. He’s not going to buy up anything. Having it handed to him on a platter is more like it.
coldwarrior on August 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM

Soros’ style is to work behind the scenes without having to leave his fingerprints on anything. His favorite tactics are:
creating havoc in elections processes,
funding the campaigns of left-wingers to take key state offices,
creating financial instability by undermining the markets, and
making investments that will help devalue the currencies of countries that he believes should be socialist.

Soros operates on the belief that freaked-out citizens will have no choice but to rely on their governments which will have to keep growing in power to meet the demands.

He comes from the same place that allows Rahm to say things like, “Never let a crisis go to waste.”

Anyone read about his childhood? As a half-Jew I can affirm not only is he evil, but he represents the twisted heinous strain of Jewishness whose magnificent self-hatred/loathing projects itself onto real Jews — Israeli’s and observant Jews (you’re not a real Jew if you say you’re an atheist, sorry) — and does everything in its power to annihilate the latter. See – Hitler, Spielberg, Emanuel(s), Chomsky, Finkelstein, etc. etc. (it’s terrifying how long this list is)

Simona on August 10, 2009 at 3:51 PM

That’s right. Orthodoxy versus Secular. Secular Jews maintain an ethnic relationship or identity, Orthodox Jews are the “religious Jews” or actual Jews in the context you correctly identify.

It’s like people who claim to be Christian but attend “churches” engaged in witchcraft, voodoo, Santeria, “humanism” and New Age whatevers. It’s not Christianity, their beliefs and activities are not Christian.

Leftwingers among both Jews and Catholics are neither in reality but they are Leftwingers first and foremost, misrepresenting their “faith” relationships as mostly just political demands.

Janos Hunyadi on August 10, 2009 at 3:12 PM

German Socialist Workers Party (“the Nazis”):

http://fcit.usf.edu/HOLOCAUST/TIMELINE/nazirise.HTM

No, her argument was invalid. Soros made most of his money in currency speculation–by ‘gaming’ the capitalist system in order to profit from what he wanted to destroy.

He’s a Closet Communist, and did not ‘do business’ with the Nazi regime because he was 3 to 15 years old during its existence

False accusations only discredit the substantial case which still needs to be effectively made against him

Janos Hunyadi on August 10, 2009 at 3:12 PM

No, actually, MY “argument” was and is entirely valid.

Perhaps it is you who is avoiding calling the thing that is what it is.

Soros — so you say now at the age of 15 while I never made any comments about his age at the time or any other — corroborated, cooperated with the Nazis. The German Socialists. He did so for personal gain, “for profit” in other words, ascribed to actions that benefited himself for personal gain, in other words, the man received a greater satisfaction reward for cooperating with evil than he did with opposing it.

I never alleged that Soros “made most of his money” that way, I simply said he’d collaborated or cooperated with the Nazis. A brief generalization BUT AN ACCURATE STATEMENT.

I don’t have the faintest idea as to what MONETARY reward or gain Soros may have received from doing such — that wasn’t my earlier concern nor point nor is now — but as to his character. His actions seem consistent throughout his life as being that by a person with rotten character, who pursues personal reward from evil. He has evil — debased, degenerate, wretched — character, let me put it that way.

I’m not defending Soros, but you are not clear about Nazis and ‘German Socialists’.

Soros was 15 when the National Socialist German Workers Party regime was defeated in 1945. New parties were set up for the first elections in 1949 in the new ‘German Federal Republic ( West Germany ). One of the two major parties since then has been the Social Democratic Party, which is a typical leftist welfare state party like Labour in Britain–and in no way ‘Nazi’

Janos Hunyadi on August 10, 2009 at 3:07 PM

Soundbites are difficult in a few sentences. My point was that Soros was involved with (for personal gain, therefore, “for profit”) German Socialists, the Nazis.

German Socialists, the Nazis, who I meant earlier. I’m not of any confusion as to who the Nazis were, nor what Soros’ involvements were even at the age of 15: still self-promotional in affiliation with evil.

The man profited by cooperating with the Nazis. That’s what I meant. What his age was when he did so doesn’t seem to be the issue, particularly since Soros has never denounced his activities at that age or any other.

Some pro-life Democrat voters may see “universal healthcare” as reducing the cost of having babies (not true, I know, I know–we are not talking math majors here), and thus maybe reducing the need for abortion. If universal healthcare doesn’t happen now, they are not going to be as willing to overlook how not pro-life the Democrats are come the next election.

Sekhmet on August 10, 2009 at 3:06 PM

I have actually tried discussing the issue of abortion as sin (grave evil, profound evil) WITH a Catholic nun, a person who is with a Catholic health care order, who I know relatively well on some levels.

I was aghast — shocked — to find her reveal that she is a Democrat. She says she didn’t vote for Obama, but she’s a Democrat.

I ASKED her how in Heaven’s name she could justify even associating with the Democratic Party while also professing to ascribe to and support the positions maintained by the Vatican, particularly as to abortion and euthanasia (since she’s had a career in Catholic health care), and I didn’t receive any response.

I cannot understand the disconnect some people try to maintain between their support and advocacy FOR evil while they then maintain that they are Catholic, or Christian as to Protestants. If you’re associating with evil, you’re taking the evil on yourself. I mean by that, you become it when you embrace it, even if it’s by support indirectly for it.

Thanks for your remarks, I better understand now your earlier point. I read a lot of negating about Catholics, particularly religious orders, though I also recognize that it can be difficult in these times with so many Leftwingers claiming to be Catholic while doing their best to encourage evil (they reveal they are not Catholics by the issues they endorse and support — that’s even a context in Catholic theology, that one is excommunicated by the process of involving in evil without redemption for such, for instance, as with Pelosi, Sebelius, Kerry, Kennedy, Biden, Dodd, etc., they actually have already, long past, excommunicated themselves from the Church, while instead declaring they are Catholics in the present [they are not based upon their actions, regardless of how much they maintain some sort of 'religiosity']).

So it’s difficult on all fronts, both as a Catholic to observe so much denigration of the Church AND as a Christian viewing so many who allege to be Catholic doing their best to proliferate evil (and to lead others astray, also quite a terrible sin).

Anyway, thanks for your comments.

The Allergists voted to scratch it, but the Dermatologists advised not to make any rash moves.

The Gastroenterologists had sort of a gut feeling about it, but the Neurologists thought the Administration had a lot of nerve.

The Obstetricians felt they were all laboring under a misconception.

Ophthalmologists considered the idea shortsighted.

Pathologists yelled, “Over my dead body!” while the pediatricians said, “Oh, Grow up!”

The Psychiatrists thought the whole idea was madness, while the Radiologists could see right through it.

Surgeons decided to wash their hands of the whole thing.

The Internists thought it was a bitter pill to swallow, and the Plastic Surgeons said, “This puts a whole new face on the matter….”

The Podiatrists thought it was a step forward, but the Urologists were pissed off at the whole idea.

The Anesthesiologists thought the whole idea was a gas, and the Cardiologists didn’t have the heart to say no.

In the end, the Proctologists won out, leaving the entire decision up to the assholes in Washington.

Of course the drug companies want a public plan. They know they’ll make out like bandits.

A public plan will completely destroy the drug companies because of the price controls on drugs which will inevitably come with time. Just look at how much cheaper drugs are in countries with nationalized health care, and it’s because of the price controls. The drug companies are hoping they can buy off Congress by agreeing to cuts now, but no way will the lying bastards in Congress keep their end of the bargain.