Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Deficit grows by $181 billion in July, hits $1,300,000,000,000

posted at 11:36 am on August 10, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

While Congress debates how to take over the health-care industry, more evidence arrives that shows it can’t even handle the business it has already.  The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the federal deficit accelerated in July by $181,000,000,000 ($181 billion) and hit $1,300,000,000,000 ($1.3 trillion) for 2009.  The massive new hit to the annual deficit comes from rapidly falling revenues, and an even more rapid increase in spending:

Bailouts for financial firms and billions in tax revenue lost because of the recession drove the deficit to a record $1.3 trillion in July, according to the independent Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

Tax receipts that have fallen due to the poor economy and increased spending to save car companies, banks and mortgage firms were major contributors to the federal deficit, according to CBO, which provides official budget numbers for Congress. The federal deficit grew by another $181 billion in July. …

Spending through July of 2009 has increased by $530 billion, which is 21 percent over the same period in 2008. The bailout money for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae accounted for almost half of the spending increase. Unemployment benefits have more than doubled, Medicaid spending has grown by a quarter and Medicare spending has increased by 11 percent.

Tax revenue for the first three quarters of 2009 has fallen by approximately $350 billion, or 17 percent compared to the same period last year, due mostly to the effects of the recession on payroll, income and corporate taxes. A third of the decline is due to tax breaks in the stimulus, including the middle-class tax cut that President Obama campaigned on during last year’s election.

Let’s compare those numbers for a moment.  Tax receipts declined by 17% in July, but spending went up by 21%.  Shouldn’t spending decrease when less money gets received?  For American families, that’s certainly how it works.  At the very least, one would expect Congress to hold the line on spending and stop any increases when it expects less revenue.  That would be the fiscally responsible path to take in an economic crisis.

Where did that money go?  It went to the continuing bailouts of financial firms and to the automakers.  Money also got spent on a stimulus package that has failed to stimulate anything, except a few thousand temp jobs and state deficit spending.  All that money stimulated was bureaucracies at the state and federal level, and at best paid for projects in 2009 that would have been funded through normal channels in the next year or two anyway.

Small wonder Barack Obama postponed the administration’s release of budget numbers last month in the middle of the health-care debate.  With the 38% swing in the deficit from last July, it would have made proposing a massive new federal program to run the nation’s health care much more difficult to justify.  Would you trust your health-care decisions to someone who can’t balance a checkbook?


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

***
Good article Captain Ed.
***
A TECHNICAL QUESTION–why is it necessary to go through Facebook to send Hot Air articles to others? Most sites provide a direct E-mail option.
***
John Bibb
***

rocketman on August 10, 2009 at 12:17 PM

Not only did the deficit grow in July… there’s a Friday News Dump no one is talking about:

http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSWEN228020090808

Raising the U.S. debt limit up past the 12.1 trillion dollars current restriction. The key part of the very brief article is that he says we could surpass the 12.1 trillion in debt restriction by middle of October.

Enoxo on August 10, 2009 at 12:18 PM

rocketman on August 10, 2009 at 12:17 PM

facebook is for r-tards that want to let the entire world what they just did 5 minutes ago.

ex:
“i just took a healthy dump.”

Ghoul aid on August 10, 2009 at 12:22 PM

enoxo, right on. they have to raise the ceiling again already, spending us into oblivion….

ginaswo on August 10, 2009 at 12:23 PM

rocketman on August 10, 2009 at 12:17 PM

I usually just put the link in an email. It’s much faster.

Laura in Maryland on August 10, 2009 at 12:25 PM

facebook is for r-tards that want to let the entire world what they just did 5 minutes ago.

ex:
“i just took a healthy dump.”

Ghoul aid on August 10, 2009 at 12:22 PM

Your utter ignorance of FB is duly noted.

Del Dolemonte on August 10, 2009 at 12:28 PM

Del Dolemonte on August 10, 2009 at 12:28 PM

oh my god it was a joke.

Ghoul aid on August 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM

Bush did worse

liberal343 on August 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM

http://semiskimmed.net/bushhitler.html

Del Dolemonte on August 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM

This spending is being done by design. It may be sold as being Keynesian, but it is much more destructive than that. The idea that centralized spending lowers unemployment doesn’t work in the real world. It creates a vicious cycle that drives up inflation, devalues the dollar, and stratifies the classes. The intent with this rampant spending and request to raise the debt ceiling is a power grab. The ones proposing this strategy are tyrants. Obama is usurping the mechanisms that made America great. He is systematically trying to destroy the institutions that have ensured freedom and class mobility. The endgame is the classless society with us at the bottom and the ruling class at the top. The union thugs and acorn people are the useful political apparatchiks that can easily be disposed of once they are no longer useful.

I am reading a bio of Margaret Thatcher right now. She has much to say on these issues, and she is right. A centralized control economy will ensure scarecity and dependence. That is not what we want in our great nation.

daesleeper on August 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbbCTJxT7MA

Even the kiddies understand this.

Laura in Maryland on August 10, 2009 at 12:31 PM

oh my god it was a joke.

Ghoul aid on August 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM

Leave the jokes to professional comedians.

In fact, I have several professional comedians as Facebook friends-if it weren’t for Facebook, I wouldn’t know that they are going to be doing some re-creations of old radio shows next weekend that will be streamed worldwide.

Del Dolemonte on August 10, 2009 at 12:33 PM

Del Dolemonte on August 10, 2009 at 12:33 PM

gotcha. i will leave it all to pelosi, barry, and barney frank!

Ghoul aid on August 10, 2009 at 12:36 PM

Bush did worse

liberal343 on August 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM

Isn’t this delicious hypocrisy? So The Won is supposed to come in with all this Hope and Change. So he does. But we find that the corruption, spending, and lies from the Federal Gubmint is not changing, so what do liberals say? “Boosch was wooorse!”…idiots.

How about Congress? The Duplicitous Party has been in since 2006, so how have they done? Honestly.

kirkill on August 10, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Bush did worse

liberal343 on August 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM

Fractions are hard.

BadgerHawk on August 10, 2009 at 12:49 PM

But Bush…

angryed on August 10, 2009 at 12:55 PM

http://semiskimmed.net/bushhitler.html

Del Dolemonte on August 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM

On the page was a quote by Linda Ronstadt. And she was right! Having Bush as president was like “…Germany, before Hitler took over.” Well, now we have a new fascist dictator just like Linda predicted.

ROCnPhilly on August 10, 2009 at 12:56 PM

If there were some way to get just half that number to not pay their taxes in protest of this spending, is there anything the government could really do about it? I mean honestly, what are they going to do, put 27 million people in jail?

Daemonocracy on August 10, 2009 at 11:58 AM

They won’t have to put people in jail, they’ll just seize their assets. In their mind it all belongs to the government you know …

PackerBronco on August 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM

No worries. Geithner says Obama will do whatever it takes to reduce the deficit …

… except reduce the size of the federal government.

PackerBronco on August 10, 2009 at 1:05 PM

We are stuck with this Congress until January of 2011 and with Obama until January 2013. God protect us all.

SC.Charlie on August 10, 2009 at 1:10 PM

Bush did worse

liberal343 on August 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM

Fractions are hard.

BadgerHawk on August 10, 2009 at 12:49 PM

Indeed. Especially when you have them upside-down.

—–

Using numbers from Wikipedia:

Increase in national debt, 2004-2008: 2.6 trillion

Increase in national debt, 2009-2013: 4.6 trillion (est.)

Just FYI to liberal343: first number is Bush, second number is Obama

ZenDraken on August 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM

No worries. Geithner says Obama will do whatever it takes to reduce the deficit …

… except reduce the size of the federal government.

PackerBronco on August 10, 2009 at 1:05 PM

U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner asked Congress to increase the $12.1 trillion debt limit on Friday, saying it is “critically important” that they act in the next two months.

Mr. Geithner, in a letter to U.S. lawmakers, said that the Treasury projects that the current debt limit could be reached as early mid-October. Increasing the limit is important to instilling confidence in global investors, Mr. Geithner said.

(via drudge)

Whisky Tango Foxtrot.

TN Mom on August 10, 2009 at 1:15 PM

Using numbers from Wikipedia:

Increase in national debt, 2004-2008: 2.6 trillion

Increase in national debt, 2009-2013: 4.6 trillion (est.)

Just FYI to liberal343: first number is Bush, second number is Obama

ZenDraken on August 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM

It’s probably more illuminating to look at the spending of individual sessions of congress, and who controlled each house.

Count to 10 on August 10, 2009 at 1:18 PM

To be fair, though, I don’t think anyone could have anticipated how expensive waging the war on political terrorists (and Nazis and zombies to boot!) was going to be.

(wait, does this figure not include those numbers?)

BlueCollarAstronaut on August 10, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Count to 10 on August 10, 2009 at 1:18 PM

Agreed, but look at what you can figure out in just a minute or two.

One of the fundamental problems liberals seem to have is a lack of basic math skills. The math always catches up to them in the end, but we all pay for it.

ZenDraken on August 10, 2009 at 1:27 PM

Mr. Geithner, in a letter to U.S. lawmakers, said that the Treasury projects that the current debt limit could be reached as early mid-October. Increasing the limit is important to instilling confidence in global investors, Mr. Geithner said.

HAHAHA.

Geithner thinks there are still global investors who are interested in propping up an economy that is currently in a death spiral.

Hey, here’s an idea Timmy. Give foreign countries 20 billion dollars for every 10 billion they invest in the USA.

Cash for Countries.

fogw on August 10, 2009 at 1:31 PM

“Uh….uuuuuuh… yaunt……let me be clear….uh…. we inherited July. Uh…you might remember….uh… that month was added to the calender long before I took office”

RightWinged on August 10, 2009 at 1:32 PM

Indeed. Especially when you have them upside-down.

ZenDraken on August 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM

Yup.

Increasing the limit is important to instilling confidence in global investors, Mr. Geithner said.

(via drudge)

Whisky Tango Foxtrot.

TN Mom on August 10, 2009 at 1:15 PM

I’m brimming with confidence.

BadgerHawk on August 10, 2009 at 1:37 PM

Agreed, but look at what you can figure out in just a minute or two.

One of the fundamental problems liberals seem to have is a lack of basic math skills. The math always catches up to them in the end, but we all pay for it.

ZenDraken on August 10, 2009 at 1:27 PM

Its just that a lot of the worst stuff Bush signed was passed by a congress with at least one house under Democrat control. The ‘cut a check to everyone and call it a tax break’ ’stimulus’ comes to mind.

Count to 10 on August 10, 2009 at 1:40 PM

So, the DemonRATs are now defending Bush, I mean Obama, by saying he is not as bad as BOOOOSHITLERHALIBURTON? They are defending Obama not by saying he is the best President EVAH! but by saying he is not as bad as the boogeyman.

Anyone get this, anyone read between the lines. It is a tacit admission that Obama is inept, corrupt and not good for America.

Obama=Bush

Son of Pelayo

Pelayo on August 10, 2009 at 1:43 PM

$1,300,000,000,000

Is this deficit legal?!?!?

FontanaConservative on August 10, 2009 at 2:03 PM

We are stuck with this Congress until January of 2011 and with Obama until January 2013. God protect us all.

SC.Charlie on August 10, 2009 at 1:10 PM

Not that it is going to happen but isn’t there some mechanism in place where a state can essentially declare no confidence in one of their elected officals and get them removed from office?

highhopes on August 10, 2009 at 2:11 PM

“Giant U.S. Money Leak Ruins Floors Throughout China” http://optoons.blogspot.com/2009/07/giant-us-money-leak-ruins-floors.html and “Obama Supporters Use Latest Debt Projections to Press for Constitutional Amendment Allowing Involuntary Servitude” http://optoons.blogspot.com/2009/06/obama-supporters-use-latest-debt.html

Mervis Winter on August 10, 2009 at 2:17 PM

Count to 10 on August 10, 2009 at 1:40 PM

I’m not really trying to defend Bush (or the Republicans) on this, just pointing out in relative terms of increasing the deficit, Obama is at least twice as bad as Bush.

Prior to the crash of ‘08, the Bush deficit was decreasing at a steady rate. If continued, the deficit would have zeroed-out in a couple of years. That would not have fixed the problem, but it would have prevented it from getting worse. Obama’s deficit, on the other hand, is projected to expand continuously, according to the recent CBO graphs.

ZenDraken on August 10, 2009 at 2:20 PM

This is just scary.

Terrye on August 10, 2009 at 4:15 PM

The numbers no longer matter. We will never pay back this money. All we are debating is a default–when and where. My guess, 50-75 years from now.

patrick neid on August 10, 2009 at 6:05 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.