<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN poll: Obama drops 10 points in 100 days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 18:39:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wallace Doesn&#8217;t Suffer Fools. - Susannah&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2733629</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wallace Doesn&#8217;t Suffer Fools. - Susannah&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2733629</guid>
		<description>[...] ratings are in the toilet. Furthermore, the Obama Administration will probably continue on it’s quest to alienate swing voters by allowing Democratic leaders and their surrogates in the MSM to childishly attack Fox News and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ratings are in the toilet. Furthermore, the Obama Administration will probably continue on it’s quest to alienate swing voters by allowing Democratic leaders and their surrogates in the MSM to childishly attack Fox News and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wallace Doesn&#8217;t Suffer Fools. &#124; hillbillypolitics.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2733624</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wallace Doesn&#8217;t Suffer Fools. &#124; hillbillypolitics.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2733624</guid>
		<description>[...] ratings are in the toilet. Furthermore, the Obama Administration will probably continue on it’s quest to alienate swing voters by allowing Democratic leaders and their surrogates in the MSM to childishly attack Fox News and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ratings are in the toilet. Furthermore, the Obama Administration will probably continue on it’s quest to alienate swing voters by allowing Democratic leaders and their surrogates in the MSM to childishly attack Fox News and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluegrass</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2530988</link>
		<dc:creator>bluegrass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2530988</guid>
		<description>the fall of Satin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fall of Satin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technopeasant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2530737</link>
		<dc:creator>technopeasant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2530737</guid>
		<description>The more relevant poll released today was the Quinnpiac Poll which showed:

1)Obama lost 7 points in his favorables in one month and is now down to 50% favorable, that confirms the Rasmussen DTP showing Obama hovering between 49 and 51% for the last week and the PPP poll released July 20th which showed Obama also at a 50% favorable number

2)Obama is now down to 45% approval with indies which is in line with the Battleground poll, PEW poll and PPP poll.

3)2409 REGISTERED VOTERS were surveyed and the MOE is only + or - 2%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more relevant poll released today was the Quinnpiac Poll which showed:</p>
<p>1)Obama lost 7 points in his favorables in one month and is now down to 50% favorable, that confirms the Rasmussen DTP showing Obama hovering between 49 and 51% for the last week and the PPP poll released July 20th which showed Obama also at a 50% favorable number</p>
<p>2)Obama is now down to 45% approval with indies which is in line with the Battleground poll, PEW poll and PPP poll.</p>
<p>3)2409 REGISTERED VOTERS were surveyed and the MOE is only + or &#8211; 2%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Post does the race hustle &#124; Political Byline</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2529084</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Post does the race hustle &#124; Political Byline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2529084</guid>
		<description>[...] are feeling a bad case of voters remorse and it is showing. Of course some are pointing to some over sampling in the polls and fear a nefarious motive. This could very well be, but I like to think that people are just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are feeling a bad case of voters remorse and it is showing. Of course some are pointing to some over sampling in the polls and fear a nefarious motive. This could very well be, but I like to think that people are just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HellCat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2528811</link>
		<dc:creator>HellCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2528811</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;CNN offers two kinds of responses for happy, one for unhappy, and one that asks people to diagnose themselves with a clinical disease.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I hope antidepressants are covered by Obamacare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>CNN offers two kinds of responses for happy, one for unhappy, and one that asks people to diagnose themselves with a clinical disease.</p></blockquote>
<p>I hope antidepressants are covered by Obamacare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blueguitarbob</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527887</link>
		<dc:creator>blueguitarbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527887</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;    Interviews with 1,136 adult Americans, including an oversample of African-Americans, conducted by telephone by Opinion Research Corporation on July 31-August 3, 2009...

Did they correct for that oversample?  Did they weight the responses?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The term &quot;oversample&quot; is a specific term of art in survey methodology which implies weighting of the responses. Oversampling is a very effective technique to improve response rates for sub-sections of the sample. All responses are then weighted to bring the sample composition back to some objective standard for that variable. For most variables (race, in this example), census data is used to determine the objective distribution.

It would be highly unusual for a survey professional to use the term &quot;oversample&quot; and not use proportional weighting for that oversampled variable in the analysis. It would be unethical, in my opinion. It may be hard to believe, but national public opinion polling is conducted by a highly professional, straight-arrow, borderline-nerdy group of people. They all try to devise proprietary techniques to give their companies competitive edges, but I would find it hard to believe that they would violate ethics or fail to follow accepted procedures.

That said, all surveys should be viewed with a critical eye toward methods. Everyone makes mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>    Interviews with 1,136 adult Americans, including an oversample of African-Americans, conducted by telephone by Opinion Research Corporation on July 31-August 3, 2009&#8230;</p>
<p>Did they correct for that oversample?  Did they weight the responses?</p></blockquote>
<p>The term &#8220;oversample&#8221; is a specific term of art in survey methodology which implies weighting of the responses. Oversampling is a very effective technique to improve response rates for sub-sections of the sample. All responses are then weighted to bring the sample composition back to some objective standard for that variable. For most variables (race, in this example), census data is used to determine the objective distribution.</p>
<p>It would be highly unusual for a survey professional to use the term &#8220;oversample&#8221; and not use proportional weighting for that oversampled variable in the analysis. It would be unethical, in my opinion. It may be hard to believe, but national public opinion polling is conducted by a highly professional, straight-arrow, borderline-nerdy group of people. They all try to devise proprietary techniques to give their companies competitive edges, but I would find it hard to believe that they would violate ethics or fail to follow accepted procedures.</p>
<p>That said, all surveys should be viewed with a critical eye toward methods. Everyone makes mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. ZhivBlago</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527851</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. ZhivBlago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527851</guid>
		<description>Like a spring, at some point these numbers are going to be compressed to the maximum and couldn&#039;t possibly get any lower (African-Americans, Libtard base, ostriches, etc.).

At that point the MSM will hype the stabilization of Dear Leaders&#039; numbers and have their little Libtard round table discussions on how The One&#039;s programs are beginning to &quot;resonate&quot;, and how folks are finally starting to realize that the Lib programs really are what&#039;s best for them...just takes time to realize that a benign autocracy really isn&#039;t all that bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like a spring, at some point these numbers are going to be compressed to the maximum and couldn&#8217;t possibly get any lower (African-Americans, Libtard base, ostriches, etc.).</p>
<p>At that point the MSM will hype the stabilization of Dear Leaders&#8217; numbers and have their little Libtard round table discussions on how The One&#8217;s programs are beginning to &#8220;resonate&#8221;, and how folks are finally starting to realize that the Lib programs really are what&#8217;s best for them&#8230;just takes time to realize that a benign autocracy really isn&#8217;t all that bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akzed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527817</link>
		<dc:creator>Akzed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527817</guid>
		<description>Some turds float, some turds sink, and some turds float for a while then sink. Hussein is in process of sinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some turds float, some turds sink, and some turds float for a while then sink. Hussein is in process of sinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff from WI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527733</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff from WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527733</guid>
		<description>The only thing I want to hear dropping is his blood pressure, down to 0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I want to hear dropping is his blood pressure, down to 0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WashingtonsWake</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527714</link>
		<dc:creator>WashingtonsWake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527714</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Given CNN’s conclusions in the polling, it seems likely that a properly-balanced poll would result in lower approval numbers for Obama.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The question really is whether the poll they&#039;re comparing against (which presumably was also their own sampling) was equally lax in correcting for oversamples and such. If the same methodology was used both times, then relative drop would presumably be about the same and the results are valid enough as far as they go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Given CNN’s conclusions in the polling, it seems likely that a properly-balanced poll would result in lower approval numbers for Obama.</p></blockquote>
<p>The question really is whether the poll they&#8217;re comparing against (which presumably was also their own sampling) was equally lax in correcting for oversamples and such. If the same methodology was used both times, then relative drop would presumably be about the same and the results are valid enough as far as they go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Z</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527604</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527604</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hmmmm, those words when put into an acronym spell “ORC”. Last I checked Orcs don’t exist…anymore. Therefore this poll is null and void.

FontanaConservative on August 6, 2009 at 2:18 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As somebody posted on another thread, the mellifluous silver-tongued &quot;Saruman&quot; Obama is marshalling his ACORN Orcs against the American people, holed up in their last bastion like the Rohirrim in Helm&#039;s Deep. But Obama&#039;s efforts to force socialized medicine down our throats may have awakened the sleeping giants, like the old slumbering treelike Ents who destroyed Saruman&#039;s empire once their anger was aroused. 

Who is our &quot;Gandalf&quot; who can defeat SarObama&#039;s rhetorical wizardry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hmmmm, those words when put into an acronym spell “ORC”. Last I checked Orcs don’t exist…anymore. Therefore this poll is null and void.</p>
<p>FontanaConservative on August 6, 2009 at 2:18 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>As somebody posted on another thread, the mellifluous silver-tongued &#8220;Saruman&#8221; Obama is marshalling his ACORN Orcs against the American people, holed up in their last bastion like the Rohirrim in Helm&#8217;s Deep. But Obama&#8217;s efforts to force socialized medicine down our throats may have awakened the sleeping giants, like the old slumbering treelike Ents who destroyed Saruman&#8217;s empire once their anger was aroused. </p>
<p>Who is our &#8220;Gandalf&#8221; who can defeat SarObama&#8217;s rhetorical wizardry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedwagon82</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527535</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedwagon82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527535</guid>
		<description>Time to buy another dog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to buy another dog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Z</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527486</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527486</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Evidently the President is serving a different god than you and I.

jazz_piano on August 6, 2009 at 12:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Jeremiah Wright. He d@mns America. He&#039;s jealous of those bitter people who cling to the other God. 

May the real God bless America, but not necessarily Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Evidently the President is serving a different god than you and I.</p>
<p>jazz_piano on August 6, 2009 at 12:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Jeremiah Wright. He d@mns America. He&#8217;s jealous of those bitter people who cling to the other God. </p>
<p>May the real God bless America, but not necessarily Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527422</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527422</guid>
		<description>I hope Ochimpy fails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Ochimpy fails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alden Pyle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527417</link>
		<dc:creator>Alden Pyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527417</guid>
		<description>At a tenth of a point per day that will put him at -1,204 by term&#039;s end.....recklessly presuming there is no incident which precludes him from executing a full term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a tenth of a point per day that will put him at -1,204 by term&#8217;s end&#8230;..recklessly presuming there is no incident which precludes him from executing a full term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogsoldier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527398</link>
		<dc:creator>dogsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527398</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And each of those polls skewed lib.

LibTired on August 6, 2009 at 1:08 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


I&#039;ve been saying that for months. If a real and accurate poll were conducted, the results would be very bleak for Bozo and his regime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And each of those polls skewed lib.</p>
<p>LibTired on August 6, 2009 at 1:08 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve been saying that for months. If a real and accurate poll were conducted, the results would be very bleak for Bozo and his regime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FontanaConservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527357</link>
		<dc:creator>FontanaConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527357</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Opinion Research Corporation&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Hmmmm, those words when put into an acronym spell &quot;ORC&quot;. Last I checked Orcs don&#039;t exist...anymore. Therefore this poll is null and void.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Opinion Research Corporation</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmmmm, those words when put into an acronym spell &#8220;ORC&#8221;. Last I checked Orcs don&#8217;t exist&#8230;anymore. Therefore this poll is null and void.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527241</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527241</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He has a “rock bottom” and I think with all things considered, the worst he’ll ever be is 40%. Bush’s numbers plummeted because he wasn’t conservative enough… so the Libs that hated him no matter what were joined with the “job disapproval” of much of the Right...

mankai on August 6, 2009 at 1:02 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He has a “rock bottom” and I think with all things considered, the worst he’ll ever be is 40%. Bush’s numbers plummeted because he wasn’t conservative enough… so the Libs that hated him no matter what were joined with the “job disapproval” of much of the Right&#8230;</p>
<p>mankai on August 6, 2009 at 1:02 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Bing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upstater85</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527226</link>
		<dc:creator>Upstater85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527226</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;CNN poll: Obama drops 10 points in 100 days&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How will Anderson Cooper spin this?

***KKKATRINA!!!!!!!!!!!!!GAYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!MARRIAGE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>CNN poll: Obama drops 10 points in 100 days</p></blockquote>
<p>How will Anderson Cooper spin this?</p>
<p>***KKKATRINA!!!!!!!!!!!!!GAYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!MARRIAGE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dusty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527213</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527213</guid>
		<description>Drudge line ... &lt;a href=&quot;http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/08/06/after-6-months-more-view-obamas-presidency-as-a-failure-than-bushs/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CNN POLL: After 6 Months, More View Obama Presidency a &#039;Failure&#039; Than Bush... &lt;/a&gt;

That&#039;s gonna hurt.  Sounds like a quagmire. Does Obama have a plan B?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drudge line &#8230; <a href="http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/08/06/after-6-months-more-view-obamas-presidency-as-a-failure-than-bushs/" rel="nofollow">CNN POLL: After 6 Months, More View Obama Presidency a &#8216;Failure&#8217; Than Bush&#8230; </a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s gonna hurt.  Sounds like a quagmire. Does Obama have a plan B?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelayo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527206</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelayo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527206</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He will be ranting and raving like the delusional Hitler in the bunker.

wildcat84 on August 6, 2009 at 1:10 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Idea, get that video clip of Hitler in the bunker from the movie &lt;em&gt;Downfall&lt;/em&gt; and have fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He will be ranting and raving like the delusional Hitler in the bunker.</p>
<p>wildcat84 on August 6, 2009 at 1:10 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Idea, get that video clip of Hitler in the bunker from the movie <em>Downfall</em> and have fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarpon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527197</link>
		<dc:creator>tarpon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527197</guid>
		<description>Poll of people still waiting for their free stuff.

The Joker is no longer cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poll of people still waiting for their free stuff.</p>
<p>The Joker is no longer cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dusty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527190</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527190</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a grim milestone.  I&#039;m seeing spirals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a grim milestone.  I&#8217;m seeing spirals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildcat84</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/06/cnn-poll-obama-drops-10-points-in-100-days/comment-page-2/#comment-2527188</link>
		<dc:creator>wildcat84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=61212#comment-2527188</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

Libtards are still in “Approval ratings mean nothing” phase.

Funny how they didn’t feel this way with the last President…

Speedwagon82 on August 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

lib &quot;logic&quot;:

High approval ratings for BOOOOOSH! mean NOTHING.

Low approval ratings for Zero mean NOTHING.

High approval ratings for Zero mean IWONIWONIWON, bow before The One.

High approval ratings for BOOOOSH! mean NOTHING.

Low</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Libtards are still in “Approval ratings mean nothing” phase.</p>
<p>Funny how they didn’t feel this way with the last President…</p>
<p>Speedwagon82 on August 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>lib &#8220;logic&#8221;:</p>
<p>High approval ratings for BOOOOOSH! mean NOTHING.</p>
<p>Low approval ratings for Zero mean NOTHING.</p>
<p>High approval ratings for Zero mean IWONIWONIWON, bow before The One.</p>
<p>High approval ratings for BOOOOSH! mean NOTHING.</p>
<p>Low</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
