Disgrace: Gibbs says Ahmadinejad is the elected leader of Iran

Disgrace: Gibbs says Ahmadinejad is the elected leader of Iran

Of course Obama will take the side of the mullah’s and terrorist.

This is not a problem for an administration whose only admitted enemy is Bush and Republicans in general.

Ahmadeinejad,Hugo,Castro,and Putin all get the white glove treatment.

Baxter Greene on August 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM

Looking at Obama’s foreign policy crew,it should be no surprise that Obama has only made demands of Israel and pretty much kissed the Mullah’s butts:

This is a little background on his Advisor’s Rice and Powers.

Samantha Power

POWERS ON ISRAEL:

“alienat[e] a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import; it may more crucially mean sacrificing…billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel’s military, but actually investing in the state of Palestine.”
Pretty much Powers wants us to cut off support(especially military)to Israel and invest in Palistine,basically she wants us to support the jihadist side of this conflict.
It gets better:

We have already given Hamas over 900 million dollars since Obama was elected.

We have cut off arms sales to Israel including not shipping the black hawks they utilize so well in protecting their boarders.

Power made her most problematic statement in 2002, in an interview she gave at Berkeley. The interviewer asked her this question:

without addressing the Palestine-Israel problem, let’s say you were an advisor to the President of the United States, how would you respond to current events there? Would you advise him to put a structure in place to monitor that situation, at least if one party or another [starts] looking like they might be moving toward genocide?
Power gave an astonishing answer:

What we don’t need is some kind of early warning mechanism there, what we need is a willingness to put something on the line in helping the situation. Putting something on the line might mean alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import; it may more crucially mean sacrificing — or investing, I think, more than sacrificing — billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel’s military, but actually investing in the new state of Palestine, in investing the billions of dollars it would probably take, also, to support what will have to be a mammoth protection force, not of the old Rwanda kind, but a meaningful military presence. Because it seems to me at this stage (and this is true of actual genocides as well, and not just major human rights abuses, which were seen there), you have to go in as if you’re serious, you have to put something on the line.

Yes, pull our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan and insert them into Palestine to protect them from the EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEvil Jews.

Is that Ahmadinejad laughing in the background?

This woman here is a real genius:

Susan Rice:
This is all you need to know about her to come to the conclusion of how dangerously stupid she is:

According to multiple sources, including former Clinton official Mansoor Ijaz and Richard Miniter, author of the bestseller Losing Bin Laden, it was she who was a major opponent of accepting Sudan’s offer to turn over the world’s most wanted mass murderer(Bin Laden). At the time, Rice was the Clinton Administration’s Secretary of State for African Affairs and a former assistant National Security Advisor under Sandy Berger.

According the both Ijaz and Miniter, Rice’s personal beliefs on the Sudan’s credibility led to her convincing Berger to reject their offer to turn over Bin Laden, overruling the advice of Tim Carney, then ambassador to Sudan. Her partner in this colossal error in judgment? Bush hater Richard Clarke. Sadly, a little more than a year later, Bin Laden’s murderers blew up the African embassies, killing U. S. soldiers and citizens.

Now these are the same people who whined and criticized Bush about Tora Bora where we had thousands of troops putting their lives on the line to get Osama.

Here is one of the many times that the democratic leadership could have had Osama handed to them on a silver platter but turned it down.

“Smart power indeed”

She is one of the few people still vouching for Joe Wilson’s credibility long after everyone else realized that not even vultures could find any shred of credibility on the Wilson carcass.

Talking to Hamas is going to escalate into Green Tea parties with Hezbollah,Iran,and Syria.

They will rejoice together saving the “innocent civilians” in Palistine from the EEEVVVVIIIILLLLL genocidal Zionist.
This cut off of support and appeasement coming from the Obama administration will force Israel to deal with their Iranian,Hamas,and Hezbollah problems with military strikes and possibly all out war.

How can the so called “smart ones” be so dangerously ignorant when it comes to the lessons of failure that appeasement has been throughout history.

Baxter Greene on August 4, 2009 at 4:59 PM

Obama’s Secretary of State is absolutely unfit for the job
according to…..THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION ITSELF!!.

How about Mrs. 3 am phone call herself.
Lets let the Obama administration break down Hillary’s credentials when they were running against her in the primaries:
Senator Clinton’s Claims of Foreign Policy Experience Are Exaggerated
By Greg Craig
To: Interested Parties
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/clintons_exaggerated_experienc.html

When your entire campaign is based upon a claim of experience, it is important that you have evidence to support that claim. Hillary Clinton’s argument that she has passed “the Commander- in-Chief test” is simply not supported by her record.

This bitc# slapping of Hillary is coming from democrats,not Rush or Coulter.

I guess we can all be thankful she survived that sniper fire in Bosnia.

Then we have the sage of international policy.
The smartest man in the room according to democrats from all over Capital Hill.
The man that was brought on as VP for his intelligence (according to liberals of course) and vast knowledge of international affairs MR. JOE BIDEN himself:

“I’m sorry I’m not an economist,” Biden said as he was describing the methodology. “My background is foreign policy and the constitution. “

Of course, that’s why Barack Obama put Biden in charge of the economic stimulus project. 

Biden Has Served As Obama’s Top Foreign Policy Critic, Even Saying Obama Is Not Ready To Be President:

Biden Said Obama Is Not Ready To Serve As President. ABC’s George Stephanopoulos: “You were asked is he ready. You said ‘I think he can be ready, but right now I don’t believe he is. The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training.’” Sen. Biden: “I think that I stand by the statement.”

(ABC’s, “This Week,” 8/19/07)

 
Biden On Whether He Would Meet Unconditionally With The Leaders Of Rogue States As Obama Said He Would:

“Absolutely Positively No.“

Biden: “Would I make a blanket commitment to meet unconditionally with the leaders of each of those countries within the first year I was elected president? Absolutely positively no.” (Sen. Joe Biden,

Remarks At The National Press Club, Washington, DC, 8/1/07)

Obama apparently did not share many views within the democratic party concerning the supreme intelligence of Biden:

Obama Attacked Proponents Of The Iraq War As Having “Helped To Authorize And Engineer The Biggest Foreign Policy Disaster In Our Generation.”

Obama: “Well, look, I find it amusing that those who helped to authorize and engineer the biggest foreign policy disaster in our generation are now criticizing me for making sure that we are on the right battlefield and not the wrong battlefield in the war against terrorism.”

(Sen. Barack Obama, MSNBC/AFL-CIO Democrat Presidential Forum, 8/7/07)

Of Course Biden felt this way about Saddam before it became politically expedient to be anti-war…you know…after voting for war:

Biden Called Saddam Hussein “An Extreme Danger To The World.”

Biden: “This is a guy who’s used weapons of mass destruction. This is a guy who’s destabilized the whole neighborhood. This is a guy who in a war with the Iranians, over 800,000 people on both sides were killed. This is a guy who is an extreme danger to the world. And this is a guy who is in every way possible seeking weapons of mass destruction. That case, in and of itself, ought to be sufficient.”

(NBC’s “Meet The Press,” 8/4/02)

Biden: “We Have No Choice But To Eliminate The Threat.”

NBC’s Tim Russert: “If the president of the United States was saying four years ago clear evidence of mass destruction, do we have any choice but to eliminate Saddam Hussein and the threat?” Biden: “We have no choice but to eliminate the threat.”

(NBC’s “Meet The Press,” 8/4/02)

How in the world the difference’s of such serious issues came together so quickly that they could run on the same ticket revels that politics trumps policy and what’s best for this country concerning these two poseur’s.

I guess it was Biden’s incredible genius when it comes to international affairs that sealed the deal.
Like:

In a vignette at the end of the article, Biden ponders mightily over how the US should respond to 9/11:

At the Tuesday-morning meeting with committee staffers, Biden launches into a stream-of-consciousness monologue about what his committee should be doing, before he finally admits the obvious: “I’m groping here.” Then he hits on an idea: America needs to show the Arab world that we’re not bent on its destruction. “Seems to me this would be a good time to send, no strings attached, a check for $200 million to Iran,” Biden declares. He surveys the table with raised eyebrows, a How do ya like that? look on his face.

The hits just keep coming:

Biden Suggests That Dividing The Iraqi Population Will Bring Unity To The Region. Biden:

“The idea is to maintain a unified Iraq by decentralizing it and giving Kurds, Shiites and Sunnis their own regions.

How do the people who are in touch with reality feel about slow Joe the Plagiarizer’s plan:

Saudi Prince Turki Al-Faisal Said Biden’s Plan Would Be “A Disaster.”

“Prince Turki told a conference on Washington’s relations with the Arab world that dividing Iraq into three regions, reflecting its Shi’ite, Sunni and Kurdish populations, would be a disaster.” (Voice Of America, “Saudi Envoy Says Dividing Iraq Will Cause Mass Killing,”

Press Release, 10/30/06)

Ouch!!

Biden Says Violence May Cause Disengagement From Iraq (Update1)

July 4 (Bloomberg) — Vice President Joseph Biden told Iraqi leaders that the path to a secure peace lies in uniting ethnic and sectarian groups and said the U.S. might disengage from their country if it reverts to sustained violence.

Absolute genius!!!!

All the terrorist have to do is go all out on a campaign of death and destruction thus insuring their No.1 enemy,the US, will abandon Iraq to their brutality and terrorist leadership.

More outstanding leadership from Obama’s No. 1 man:

Biden to Zapatero: Hey, thanks for all that help in Iraq

Barcepundit catches Joe Biden in Spain doing … well, what Joe Biden does best.  Joe Biden remembered to thank Spanish Prime Minister Jose Zapatero for all the help he gave us in Iraq, except that the only thing Zapatero gave us in Iraq was the finger:

As everybody knows, the first decision Zapatero made after his unexpected win in 2004, right after the Madrid train terrorist attacks, was to abruptly and unilaterally pull out from Iraq. So either Biden made a gaffe, or he was thanking Zapatero for angering Bush…

On and on and on the idiocy and naiveté of the Obama administration and their foreign policy team is on display.

There is no one on this team that shows any ability to make sound judgments that deal with some of the most dangerous leaders and terrorist elements known to man.

Baxter Greene on August 4, 2009 at 5:43 PM