ObamaCare: The Unreality-based Community vs. Sen. Nelson
posted at 8:30 am on August 4, 2009 by Karl
The HuffPo’s Nico Pitney reports on the Left’s counter-productive campaign for ObamaCare in Nebraska:
Senator Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) lashed out Friday at the ads being run against his position on health care reform in his home state, saying they would backfire — and might even derail the entire reform process.
In a statement issued late in the afternoon by Nelson’s office, spokesman Jake Thompson warned that if the new series of ads calling out the Senator’s “stalling” on reform were “an indication of the politics going into August, then health care reform may be dead by the end of August.”
“Nebraskans don’t need outside special interest groups telling them what to think. Senator Nelson has nothing but praise for Nebraska groups working toward health care reform. Unfortunately, he says, these outside groups undermine the sincere and dedicated efforts of people in our state,” Thompson wrote. “Recently, similar ads have run in Nebraska. Those ads by other special interests prompted hundreds of Nebraskans to call our offices, with 9 to 1 urging Senator Nelson to do exactly the opposite of what the special interest group wanted. In short, the ads backfired.”
The response to Nelson from the Left was sadly predictable. The Washington Monthly’s Steve Benen called his statement “petty.” At the misnamed Moderate Voice, Kathy Kattenburg calls Nelson “awfully touchy.” OpenLeft’s Paul Rosenberg goes straight to profanity.
All of the above — not to mention the New York Times blurb on the story — avoid the part about the hundreds of calls to Nelson’s office, running 9 to 1 against ObamaCare. While those telephone calls are not a scientific sample, they are a tangible reminder that poll after poll shows that strong opponents of ObamaCare greatly outnumber strong supporters. Intensity matters, as any study of issues like abortion or gun control will reveal. It is an incovenient truth for the Left.
Instead, Lefties like Rosenberg and the founder of one of the groups named in the HuffPo report prefer to accuse Nelson of being bought by health and insurance interests. It is true that Nelson has been both chief executive officer of an insurance company and Nebraska’s state insurance regulator, and has received a lot of donations from insurance and health care interests in his three campaigns for federal office. However, even by Rosenberg’s numbers, Nelson has collected more from Omaha and Lincoln than from the insurance and health industries. And the truth is that there is significant overlap. Nebraska has a sizeable insurance industry, most of it located in Omaha. Nebraska’s 25 largest employers include Mutual of Omaha and 10 different medical centers. It is thus no surprise that Nebraskans are intensely interested in the Democrats’ efforts to fundamentally restructure their businesses.
There is also the tiny little fact that Nebraska has been a red state since 1964.
The current state of play has the Democrats looking to steamroll moderates in the Senate (x2) and the House. Indeed, there is another round of sabre-rattling about ramming a partisan healthcare bill through the budget reconciliation process, though that is a risky gamble under the best of circumstances. Immaturely accusing a key Senator of being petty and corrupt probably worsens the Left’s odds, but I wish them the best of luck with that tactic.
—
Update: There was intensity on display over the weekend in Philadelphia, where “[a] raucous standing-room-only crowd of more than 400 cheered, jeered, and booed Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter.” Let’s go to the video.
This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com.
To see the comments on the original post, look here.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
talk about ignorant!!
try history 101 what a buffoon!
right4life on August 4, 2009 at 2:16 PM
you ARE them.
right4life on August 4, 2009 at 2:16 PM
Got news for you, you great constitutional scholar you, but that’s from the Declaration of Independance, not the constitution.
Regardless, should the US go to war everytime some nation fails to treat all of it’s citizens equally?
If you say no, then you are revealing yourself to be as big a hypocrite as I have claimed.
MarkTheGreat on August 4, 2009 at 2:17 PM
link
talk about ignorant….laughable…
right4life on August 4, 2009 at 2:20 PM
So you aren’t aware that Britain got rid of slavery internally, before it began to get rid of it everywhere else?
I also note that the British didn’t invade any country to eliminate slavery.
Yet you try to use them as a model for how Lincoln should have behaved.
Then you have the temerity to insult the intelligence of others.
I don’t ally myself with conservatives. I vote along with them when our interests align, I argue against them when they are wrong.
That’s how mature people handle disagreements.
Perhaps you should ask your mother since she has apparently forgotten to teach you basic manners.
MarkTheGreat on August 4, 2009 at 2:20 PM
yeah when they are OUR OWN CITIZENS, IN OUR OWN COUNTRY…duhhhhhhhhh moron.
right4life on August 4, 2009 at 2:20 PM
playground taunts. How typical of the mentally immature.
MarkTheGreat on August 4, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Great Britain didn’t have a civil war to eliminate slavery.
MarkTheGreat on August 4, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Don’t pat Nelson on the back too soon. The jackass did broker the spendulous bill.
Took him 2 months to reply to my email opposing spendulous bill. Wish he would have taken that long to read the damned thing.
PappaMac on August 4, 2009 at 2:22 PM
we did obviously…and you think we could have gotten around this how??? you notice parts of GB didn’t secede from the country over the issue of slavery…duhhhh
right4life on August 4, 2009 at 2:24 PM
truth hurts.
right4life on August 4, 2009 at 2:24 PM
And just where did I ever do that?
There’s a huge difference between saying that the War of Northern Agression was a mistake, and claiming that one believes that blacks and the unborn aren’t human.
I realize that the subtlties of adult conversation are well beyond your cognative abilities, but you might be able to manage it if youtry.
Speaking of projection.
Where did I refuse to recognize that black people aren’t human beings?
right4life on August 4, 2009 at 2:15 PM
MarkTheGreat on August 4, 2009 at 2:24 PM
we didn’t invade any other country to get rid of slavery..that was the other hated tyrant of the wacko libertarians BOOOOSHHHHHH
right4life on August 4, 2009 at 2:26 PM
and your solution to slavery is? it would have just died on its own…a ‘dying institution’ you called it…of course it isn’t important enough for someone like you to take action over…oh no…they’re just black people right???
right4life on August 4, 2009 at 2:27 PM
We had to destroy the village in order to save it.
So you don’t care that there is nothing in the constitution requiring states to stay in the union. So when Lincoln went to war to do so, he violated the constitution.
There is nothing in the constitution giving the govt power to implement a draft, so Lincoln violated the constitution when he implemented one.
There is nothing in the constitution that grants the president the power to suspend habeus corpus. But Lincoln did.
There is nothing in the constitution that gives the president the power to jail newspaper editors who don’t agree with the presidents actions. But Lincoln did.
Next thing we know, you will be telling us that the constitution is a living document, that means whatever the president wants it to mean this week.
MarkTheGreat on August 4, 2009 at 2:27 PM
you said repeatedly that lincoln broke the constitution to free black people…so apparently they are not fully human to be entitled to the same protections as white people are…right?
right4life on August 4, 2009 at 2:28 PM
I guess I missed that secession amendment…why couldn’t the south have just added that amendment??? because they were determined to have a war. they seized the federal forts as soon as they seceded.
you do know that congress can pass laws, and that not everything HAS to be in the constitution right?????
you sure seem to be making it up as you go along…
right4life on August 4, 2009 at 2:32 PM
Is that a dead animal on Senator Nelson’s head?
bw222 on August 4, 2009 at 3:37 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2