Video: Michelle makes new friend on “The View”
posted at 12:52 pm on August 3, 2009 by Allahpundit
I think we have to call it a minor disappointment simply because no one cried. The boss clearly went in there with a game plan, though: Knowing that she’d be interrupted at every opportunity, she set out to dominate the conversation, and knowing that Joy would be hostile, she made no pretense that they were just having a friendly chat. The tone is set from the get-go, with MM quizzing her about whether she read the book and Behar looking at Whoopi and smirking ostentatiously. Best part: The groans from the audience when Michelle referred to Hasselbeck as “the friendlier side of the aisle.” How dare she impugn Joy’s scrupulous impartiality.
Most of the questions had to do with whether Bush’s administration wasn’t at least equally corrupt, thereby proving that the bar for Hopenchange is being reset a little bit lower every day. As the boss says, “You know you’ve won the argument when the ladies of the View are reduced to arguing how corrupt they are, and not whether.”










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Joe Pyne on August 3, 2009 at 3:22 PM
What was Whoopi wearing!? Did she swallow Oprah or something?
MM dominated that segment. Period.
AnthonyK on August 3, 2009 at 3:23 PM
Joe Pyne on August 3, 2009 at 2:25 PM
Your posts sound like you expected MM to win the entire war against the Marxists in 1 talk show appearance. Getting Americans to wake up and stop the madness is a group effort. She did an excellent job of advancing our cause, and clearly today’s battle was won. Let’s all stay united in fighting the good fight – for America!
redwhiteblue on August 3, 2009 at 3:24 PM
When it’s among its own kind, that is just how it works. Then they share a group hug.
venividivici on August 3, 2009 at 3:24 PM
Very nice MM, way to toss it back on Behar and Whoopi.
Hog Wild on August 3, 2009 at 3:27 PM
“I want the healing power that an Obama presidency could deliver to this country.”
Guess who?
No, Obama was not built up to be Teh One…
He wasn’t supposed to change Washington. Transcend race. Fix souls. Bake twelve-minute brownies in seven minutes. /sarc
Upstater85 on August 3, 2009 at 3:28 PM
The emphasis may be true in your case. There was, however, a substantial groundswell of points that bolster this conclusion thus making it not a strawman in the least.
His own rhetoric (‘yes we can’, ‘hope and change’, etc)propagated this very idea. The media’s overt support and pushing of this narrative (Mathews’ tingle, Evan Thomas’ Godlike reference, Oprah’s rising tides/lifting oceans remark, he is the one we’ve been waiting for, etc). Never before has the media been so open and explicit about their support for a candidate. They had to justify it for credibility purposes (in their own calculations, of course).
A large mass of the voting public bought it. The seemingly staged people passing out at his speeches. A lady felt that she would no longer worry about mortgage payments, putting gas in her car, and a job. Another lady had the gall to ask him what he could do about her personal issue of homelessness. Artwork around the country expressed ‘his image’ blurring the lines of idolatry. Videos showing examples of his most ardent supporters showing zero knowledge of the issues, instead giving the hope and change mantra for their
reasonexcuse.This kind of insanity was absent in every way from McCain and his voters.
anuts on August 3, 2009 at 3:29 PM
Someone called it a Moo Moo… ???
Upstater85 on August 3, 2009 at 3:29 PM
So Obama is responsible for living up to the unrealistic expectations set for him by some in the media?
crr6 on August 3, 2009 at 3:32 PM
Slam-Dunk for the Boss!
jgapinoy on August 3, 2009 at 3:33 PM
Nope… he’s just an ordinary politician…
Upstater85 on August 3, 2009 at 3:33 PM
Speaking as a non-birther (thanks for profiling me)… Kucinich? How about McCain vs. say Chris Dodd or Bill Richardson? Jesse jackson? Ted Kennedy? (The last two, say 20 years younger.)
Where do you draw the Democratic line? Kucinich isn’t exactly a “sane” example as he about a -4% of ever getting the nomination.
mankai on August 3, 2009 at 3:33 PM
Artwork around the country expressed ‘his image’ blurring the lines of idolatry. Videos showing examples of his most ardent supporters showing zero knowledge of the issues, instead giving the hope and change mantra for their reason excuse.
This kind of insanity was absent in every way from McCain and his voters.
anuts on August 3, 2009 at 3:29 PM
Living in Chicago, one would have been excused had one mistaken it for the New Jerusalem, the way people were acting. Of course, we now know it was and is the same old cesspool of corruption so well-detailed by MM. Hopefully, this will put a whole generation off the romanticism of “big government” and we’ll have another 30-year interlude before we elect another jackass like this one.
venividivici on August 3, 2009 at 3:33 PM
Most people who do disgusting, morally repugnant, and treasonous things would say they did them “in good faith.” That’s irrelevant. What is relevant is you, and your ilk, are trying to subvert the principles on which this nation was founded for some failed European socialist system.
The fact that, according to you, “about half of Americans” have the same view as yours is frightening to those of us who love freedom, liberty, and a moral society – all values on which this country was founded. You are the strangers in this house. You are the ones seeking to infiltrate, influence, and corrupt the goals and values of this nation for a socialist utopia that has proved to be the most murderous, slanderous, and vile agenda this planet has ever seen!
We will fight you, perhaps we will lose, but we will fight you nevertheless.
Joe Pyne on August 3, 2009 at 3:34 PM
I think a valid aregument can be made that his campaign was the origin of this theme.
anuts on August 3, 2009 at 3:34 PM
It split up my “negative 4%” chance for Kucinich…
mankai on August 3, 2009 at 3:34 PM
thomasaur on August 3, 2009 at 3:35 PM
I never suggested any such thing.
You need to go back and read my posts again.
Joe Pyne on August 3, 2009 at 3:35 PM
Nah, it’s just expecting a cow to read a book.
Sign of the Dollar on August 3, 2009 at 3:36 PM
Fun Fact: the muumuu is from, of all places, Hawaii.
Was Whoopi paying tribute to The One?
inviolet on August 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM
..they did not have a chance! MM went in there with her lips blazing. What a tour de force! I love this young lady, MM. Also, did anyone notice the whoop (not Whoopi, whoop) of delight when they were informed that “everyone is going home with a copy of this book”?
..far freakin’ out!
VoyskaPVO on August 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM
First, let’s see what you wrote and what I was referring to.
Do you still believe Malkin’s premise that Obama has been set up to be a man of positive change is uh, as strawman?
Secondly, sure, no-one called him Jesus… just almost like G-d. Wouldn’t want to offend non-Christians
Thirdly, after the comments that came out of the Obama camp (his wife’s for example), you can’t tell me you don’t think that Obama didn’t at least strongly suggest that he would be a man of positive, historic change.
Upstater85 on August 3, 2009 at 3:40 PM
LOLOL
inviolet on August 3, 2009 at 3:40 PM
Doesn’t surprise me in the least. It reminds me of an email I was given from my mother. One of her colleagues sent her the following from a recent trip by his employee to DC (in may, I believe):
Creepy…
anuts on August 3, 2009 at 3:43 PM
He didn’t strongly suggest it – he SAID it. Over and over, in different ways (some more ridiculous than others) but he said it.
inviolet on August 3, 2009 at 3:43 PM
I think the ball is in your court there crr6.
Joe Pyne on August 3, 2009 at 3:46 PM
I totally agree with Michelle’s strategy with this book and her appearances: hold the administration to the standards that Obama himself set. We mustn’t give them any slack.
That is exactly what the liberals do to conservatives when it comes to social issues. If a republican is caught in an affair, there is a big to-do because of their standards. If a democrat is caught, well no big deal because they have a different set of principles.
Holding Obama to his standards is essential. It is taking Alinsky’s playbook and using it against Obama.
Mallard T. Drake on August 3, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Yep…
crr6 on August 3, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Malkin owned that set from the first second until the last. Of course the left will only become more crazy when she speaks the truth, but at least they were forced to listen to it for a few minutes. Good job MM.
MikeA on August 3, 2009 at 3:49 PM
OH SHE’S JUST AN ANGRY FILIPINA
SELL OUT!
AUNTIE TOM!
/liberal343
blatantblue on August 3, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Well, crr6 interprets things differently…
Hey, don’t be too hard on him. He’s only G-dlike.
Upstater85 on August 3, 2009 at 3:50 PM
So Michelle’s still setting up those Strawmen?
Upstater85 on August 3, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Yeah, I was a bit disappointed that MM didn’t challenge them to give examples of Bush admin “corruption”. But I suppose that wasn’t her mission and it would have squandered time better spent advancing her message.
guntotinglibertarian on August 3, 2009 at 3:51 PM
How does that translate it Tagalog? Oh, wait, liberal343 only
speaksspoke trollish…Upstater85 on August 3, 2009 at 3:53 PM
*it = in
Upstater85 on August 3, 2009 at 3:53 PM
Why is Whoopi wearing a tablecloth?
Mike D. on August 3, 2009 at 3:53 PM
She’s trying to dress like Michelle Obama?
Upstater85 on August 3, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Don’t be too hard on crr6. He either spent the past two years in a crack house or else he’s suffering from this tragic syndrome:
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/obama_win_causes_obsessive
guntotinglibertarian on August 3, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Guilty. Sorry about that. A busy day of Capitalism in action has kept me from perusing all posts. Just noticed your last 2 and it seems like you had critically high expectations of Michelle. I just wanted to defend her for doing such a great job in a hostile environment. Those View women are wicked bad…and I mean that in a bad way.
redwhiteblue on August 3, 2009 at 3:56 PM
Saw that… +10
Upstater85 on August 3, 2009 at 3:56 PM
That sort of stuff is creepy. With very few exceptions, cults of personality never end well.
venividivici on August 3, 2009 at 3:57 PM
Michelle, you rock!!!
The intelligence on the “other side of the aisle” as you put it was non-existant. They were so beneath you it was not even an engagement. A herd of cows that are biased and rude and unread. No contest….. You are on a roll Michelle…. continue to lead.
highninside on August 3, 2009 at 3:58 PM
It looked like she sat there and lectured them , they almost didn’t really care about defending.
the_nile on August 3, 2009 at 3:58 PM
If she could plant even the tiniest seeds of doubt in some minds, then it was worth the sacrifice on her part. I’m sure she’s well aware of this, and it part of the reason she did it.
SouthernGent on August 3, 2009 at 3:59 PM
I think this was supposed to be praise for Obama… can’t see how it actually is, though.
Upstater85 on August 3, 2009 at 4:00 PM
Agreed, MM did an excellent job as usual in not letting the panel purposely waste too much time with that subject (which has nothing to do with her book, that she is there to promote). Well done MM!
Ozprey on August 3, 2009 at 4:02 PM
You know your opponent is facing troubles when they try to rationalize something… you know they are facing huge troubles when they don’t even try to rationalize and simply shift the subject.
Upstater85 on August 3, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Michelle was awesome! She was like a grandmaster discussing chess with rank amateurs. They really could only listen.
Chessplayer on August 3, 2009 at 4:06 PM
I have always wondered how a person can go on this show and have a successful conversation. Michelle just showed me how.
Dr B on August 3, 2009 at 4:08 PM
But… but… but… Bush was BAAAD.
That’s quite an intelectual argument there Behar.
Scrappy on August 3, 2009 at 4:09 PM
crr6 is the “keeper of moving goalposts”.
He deserves his own “real man of genius” song/commercial.
PBoilermaker on August 3, 2009 at 4:09 PM
“Everybody in the audience is going home with the book, The Culture of Corruption.”
We know The View audience doesn’t read. Need we ask the question, CAN they read? Joy reads the book’s cover and says, “I’ve read some of it.”
Malkin did a fine job having her say against the odds in a performance that’s earned another Brava!
The open assent that Bush was as corrupt as Obama should have been couched more strongly in DEGREE. Is this the tactic of agreeing with your enemy quickly, even if they’re wrong and you know it, so that you can sell your message? I see the rationale, but am wary of the compromise, giving an inch and yet losing a mile.
As per Harriet Meyers, Bush campaigned for her nomination, but did not twist arms or lie on her behalf. He simply stuck with his line that he thought she’d make a fine justice on the Supreme Court. Then he nominated another, now Chief Justice. Bush didn’t smear Meyers’ critics as misogynists, as Obama has smeared his critics and Sotomayor’s as racists.
On amnesty for illegal aliens, yes, Bush called citizens “vigilantes” for demanding immigration enforcement of current laws. But he ended up taking that back in public references after McCain’s comprehensive immigration reform bill failed. The Border Fence is still neither complete nor functioning. But that would be Obama’s fault.
Malkin equates the Bush administration with Obama’s. Yes, she specified the Iraq/Afghan wars, but that isn’t the sum total of the Bush legacy. And like Malkin, I too have my grievances against Bush for open borders.
Beyond the obvious failures to limit a bankrupt government’s services to its own citizens, the largest complaints against Bush’s domestic legacy regard the economy as he left office, gifting us our economic slavery under Geithner via Paulson. Worse even than horrible bail-outs, Bush slammed the irons round our necks with his Executive Order granting the Sec./Treasury carte blanche infinite powers owing no transparency to anyone, no reasons to anyone, to effectively own our nation’s economy. And we’ll never be rid of the new layer of Comprehensive Federal Bureaucracy overseeing all matters of our private lives after he entered office. Homeland Security, “meant” to serve American citizens but transforming to combat them instead, has censored all references to the original enemy it was created to combat, Islamofascism and the War on Terror, substituting veterans and right-wing activists as enemies of Statism.
But those were not Malkin’s reasons for dressing down Bush “as corrupt” for The View panelists and audience. They are grounds for another book, though sadly, as Statism is indeed Bush’s legacy that set the 21st Century American course of events. And Romney would be the smiling GOP to carry it all to the next level.
maverick muse on August 3, 2009 at 4:17 PM
Shelly was delicious, as always, and threw enormous amounts of energy at them, which they were powerless to overcome.
Whoever the fat chick is — really? The first time in your life you even bothered to vote for a Presidential candidate? Hmmm…I wonder why now? (Racist pig).
Goldberg — really? You really don’t know “what we do now” that you elected a liar who flip-flops around on the dais like a walleye with a hook in his mouth? We, you withdraw your support for him, fool. You tell your liberal/liar congressmen that you’ll vote them out if they support this crooked pos, duh.
Joy — stfu, fool.
Jaibones on August 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM
Can you feel the love tonight?
Mr. Joe on August 3, 2009 at 4:20 PM
MM for the win on weakness of moral equivalence and “What about Bush?” Nice job, keep it up.
Kenosha Kid on August 3, 2009 at 4:21 PM
This episode of The View proves once and for all that the Harpies don’t do there homework.They obviuoxly didn’t know who they were dealing with.It’s one thing to use their screaching lib-logic on an effectual gentleman like Mc Cain,or an opportunistic blowhard like O’Rielly,but quite another to try that nonsense on an honest,brave woman who can back-up her statements with facts.Michelle owned that session and,unlike some commenters here,I think quite a few of the audience members will read Michelle’s book,and begin to accept the reality of the Obamas.No one can state their case more concisely and effectively than the Boss.
DDT on August 3, 2009 at 4:22 PM
Thank goodness the Democrats finally got control of the Congress and stopped all that unnecessary war funding and refused to reinstate FISA…
What?
mankai on August 3, 2009 at 4:27 PM
She did put them on guard. *haha
AnninCA on August 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM
And there you have it ladies and gentlemen, the intellectual superiority of the left in its fullness.
No problem, I do the same myself sometimes.
Joe Pyne on August 3, 2009 at 4:29 PM
Year 2020 in the Obama gulag…
“Psst… we’re going to try and escape at midnight.”
“Hey before you guys leave, you do know that Cheney had a secret meeting with oil executives in 2003, dontcha?”
mankai on August 3, 2009 at 4:30 PM
bravo to michelle, left the feelings behind and stayed focused. the panelists were unprepared.
billypaintbrush on August 3, 2009 at 4:31 PM
The whole problem is that people like Joy try to win the argument rather then just have a conversation.
Whoopi tried to pass off a false quote from Michelle’s book, and conveniently passes the buck when she’s called on it.
“Dare I say that MM is the John Roberts of The View?”
budorob on August 3, 2009 at 4:34 PM
I think the Flaming Lips might sue for violation of trademark.
hawksruleva on August 3, 2009 at 4:35 PM
This is freakin’ awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go Michelle! Serious ownage. Can we get her on that show more often?
jediwebdude on August 3, 2009 at 4:35 PM
HA-HA-HA!!…MM owned the view!!!….Of all the clips from this show, never did so few words spew forth from the leftist mouth piece.
christene on August 3, 2009 at 4:43 PM
I broke my commitment to never watch the spew or allow it on in my house just to watch Michelle. It was awesome to watch Joy Beher literally shake all over because she was so ticked off. Her arms and wrists were nearly in a tangle for all the shaking going on. I’m thinking she wanted to strangle Michelle but knew it wouldn’t play well.
Wait until tomorrow. They will have a long segment railing on Michelle when they see how this played out!
katablog.com on August 3, 2009 at 4:52 PM
I have never seen anyone take charge of an interview on The View like that. Not Ann Coulter. Not Laura Ingraham. That was amazing. They were all sitting with their heads down at the end as the audience gave a big cheer to getting a copy of the book. Great great great job.
Ronnie on August 3, 2009 at 4:57 PM
Excellent job by MM. She was sharp, focused and was able to get her message out. Joy and Whoopie seemed unprepared and that allowed MM to control the interview.
USAF_RET on August 3, 2009 at 4:59 PM
Great job, Michelle!! You are truly an inspiration to any good Conservative woman!
tickleddragon on August 3, 2009 at 5:03 PM
And yet, you love to spend so much quality time with us!
Ready for that Duelin’ Banjoes number yet, Bobby boy?
ExpressoBold on August 3, 2009 at 5:18 PM
The “liberal Spew” ladies remind me of a movie scene where a bunch of hag witches boil flesh. Michelle showed courage walking into this witches den and kicked their a$$.
farright on August 3, 2009 at 5:20 PM
WOW! She is good. She is really good!
sheesh on August 3, 2009 at 5:21 PM
Sort of like the Matt Lauer/Michelle Malkin interview. Michelle delivered Shock and Awe and left them dumbfounded.
jediwebdude on August 3, 2009 at 5:25 PM
American Power tracked-back with, “‘Have You Read the Book, Joy?’ Michelle Malkin on The View!”:
http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2009/08/have-you-read-book-joy-michelle-malkin.html
Donald Douglas on August 3, 2009 at 5:25 PM
I didn’t feel the same way about the Matt Lauer interview … or the Stephanopolis thing. She was good, but today was in a different league.
Ronnie on August 3, 2009 at 5:30 PM
WOW Michelle!!! Tons of great information given. I’ll bet their heads are (along with their responses) still spinning. Great work Michelle.
oakpack on August 3, 2009 at 5:31 PM
Ha…
Oh, you’re serious…
Hmm, I think I’ll pass on what the Nazi Collaborator’s sockpuppets have to say.
PimFortuynsGhost on August 3, 2009 at 5:36 PM
Whoopi is a fashion icon.
/ a grown woman named after a sex act?
faraway on August 3, 2009 at 5:36 PM
Kudos to Michelle…btw she’s hot!
bhawknine on August 3, 2009 at 5:38 PM
Michelle Malkin IS DA MAN! (you know what I mean). The View chics don’t even try anymore because they know that she has more than enough ammunition for all of them and they are intellectual midgets by comparison.
He brain and her tongue are too sharp for them to deal with. That wasn’t a cue card Whoopi was waving around, it was the white flag of surrender.
That is exactly the reason Bill Maher is scared to have Michelle on his show – he knows her brain process information faster and more correctly than his.
joncoltonis on August 3, 2009 at 5:38 PM
I don’t know what the hell you were listening to or what you smoked before coming on this site, but Michelle never said what you claim. That was her point she did not write anything about being the most, the second most or the least. Go have another fatty and some kool-aid.
Wade on August 3, 2009 at 5:40 PM
Thanks for posting this, AP! I forgot to set my DVR to catch this when I read MM was going to be on and so I missed the whole thing.
Bingo! As usual, great job, MM. You are someone who makes me proud to call myself a conservative woman!
jtownsley on August 3, 2009 at 5:41 PM
T-storm you are FAR, FAR too kind.
Ted Kennedy mutters:
My collie says:
CyberCipher on August 3, 2009 at 5:43 PM
Don’t flatter yourself. A great deal of it is morbid curiosity.
Watch the clip again. Around 3:30. She says Obama is really only corrupt relative to the “hope and change” he was supposed to ride in on.
crr6 on August 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM
Who is the chubby black girl, the “house on wheels czar”?
Wade on August 3, 2009 at 5:49 PM
I think the troll had it right. You were probably expecting something along the lines of PoliSci 101, which would give a person basic knowledge of how politics works. The troll would have taken polisci 100, which leaves a person with no knowledge of anything and therefore perfectly qualified to be a liberal troll.
backwoods conservative on August 3, 2009 at 5:55 PM
Wow. Just got home and watched that clip.
That is simply the best performance I have ever seen by a conservative against the harpies on The View.
You were incredible, Michelle. Thank you!
IrishEi on August 3, 2009 at 5:58 PM
You DO know that 4 guys wouldn’t act that bad on TV every day
Jeff from WI on August 3, 2009 at 6:00 PM
Watch the clip again. Around 3:30. She says Obama is really only corrupt relative to the “hope and change” he was supposed to ride in on.crr6 on August 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM
You really a POW, that part had nothing to with rating Husseins corrupt administration. EODwU
Wade on August 3, 2009 at 6:01 PM
These poor little followers of the pied piper, whining “What do you want me to do with this information?” Get a damned mind of your own and figure it out, maybe step one would be dressing yourself and quit counting on mommy to lay out your cloths on the bed.
Wade on August 3, 2009 at 6:05 PM
But…but…but what about Katrina! …and the FEMA trailers…or something…and Bush was a poopey head…so let’s give Barry a chance to be at least as bad as Bush, er yeah.
MM really opened up a can a whoop-a$$ on those “gals”.
Wyznowski on August 3, 2009 at 6:06 PM
And I am amazed there are any women who think it is acceptable but someone must be watching.
Cindy Munford on August 3, 2009 at 6:06 PM
I love how Whoopi tries to shed responsibility because she didn’t write the card with the talking points sitting in front of her. And then she displays it to the audience as if to say “hey it’s on the card it must be true”. Pathetic.
Scrappy on August 3, 2009 at 6:08 PM
Today was the first, (and last) time I saw it. I was shocked women behaved like that on TV. Then people in here said it was the USUAL thing.
Jeff from WI on August 3, 2009 at 6:14 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »