Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Rasmussen: Obama strong disapproval rises; Update: Zogby shows Obama at 48%

posted at 9:50 am on July 26, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Rasmussen has its first tracking poll taken with numbers entirely generated from after Barack Obama’s trainwreck press conference, and to no one’s surprise, his numbers have continued to decline.  While his overall job approval remained constant at 49%, those who strongly disapprove of Obama’s performance increased again to 40%, while those who strongly approve retreated to 29%.  The strongly-disapprove number has increased five points since the press conference, and the illusion of moderate, post-partisan leadership has been stripped:

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows that 29% of the nation’s voters now Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -11. That’s the first time his ratings have reached double digits in negative territory …

These updates are based upon nightly telephone interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. Today is the first update based entirely upon interviews conducted after the President’s prime time televised press conference. The number who Strongly Approve of the President has remained unchanged since the press conference but the number who Strongly Disapprove has gone up by five percentage points (from 35% on Wednesday morning to 40% today). …

The President is now seen as politically liberal by 76%. That’s up six points from a month ago, 11 points since he was elected, and the highest total to date. Forty-eight percent (48%) now see him as Very Liberal, up 20 points since he was elected.

Tax-and-spend programs will do that.  Ever since Barack Obama arrived in Washington, he’s gone on a Blame America tour abroad and spent money (or at least tried to spend money) at an astonishing rate not seen in decades.  America has awoken to the fact that they elected a radical, not a moderate, which they might have known had the media done its job on Barack Obama’s political track record in and out of office, as David Freddoso did in his book The Case Against Barack Obama.

Obama also got hammered on his response to the arrest of Henry Gates.  In polling taken on Friday and Saturday, after the White House has started its retreat on Obama’s assertion that the police “acted stupidly,” only 26% believed that Obama’s answer was “good” or “excellent”.  Sixty-three percent rated it “fair” or poor”, as did 40% of Democrats and 67% of independents.  Black voters supported Obama 71%-28%, but they voted for Obama in the last election 96%-4%, which indicates ambivalence even in this demographic (only 21% rated it “excellent”).  Obama lost a plurality of the youngest voters, 49%-45%, but lost all others by large majorities ranging from 60%-73%.

But was it right to ask the question in the first place?   Lynn Sweet gets second-guessed by a narrow plurality overall, 43%-41%, and most interestingly, by a majority of black voters, 58%-28%.

I doubt we’ll see any prime-time press conferences for a while.  I also think it may be a while before Lynn Sweet gets to ask a question at any Obama press briefing.

Update: I meant to include the latest Zogby polling, released on Friday.  Downside: It’s Zogby.  Upside … well, it’s Zogby:

A new Zogby Interactive survey shows a slight decline in President Barack Obama’s job approval, with 48% of likely voters now approving of the job he is doing as president, down from 51% who said the same in an interactive/telephone hybrid poll conducted in mid-June. Forty-nine percent now say they disapprove of the job the president has done so far in office and 4% are not sure.

The survey found similar results when likely voters were asked specifically to rate President Obama’s performance—47% give him a positive rating, with 22% rating his job performance as “excellent” and 25% rating it as “good.” But slightly more than half (53%) give the president a negative job performance rating, with 10% who say he is doing a “fair” job as president and 43% who say he is doing a “poor” job—up from 36% who said he was doing a poor job in mid-June.

Zogby’s sample is almost 4500 likely voters, with a claimed MOE of 1.5%.  Some on the Left claim Rasmussen skews rightward, while those on the Right tend to think of Zogby leaning the other direction.  In this case, they’re coming up with the same numbers.  Zogby’s polling includes two days prior to the Obama presser; keep an eye on the next survey.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5

See Obama’s moon slink down in the sky
Every dream he spins is a lie
Here’s the one bitter lesson of Obama’s history
His soul should no longer remain a mystery
His many faces change
What some thought they knew grows ever more strange
And he has so many faces
His real self often erases
With all those lies dancing in his empty eyes!

PercyB on July 26, 2009 at 4:56 PM

I remember when Bush’s approval rating fell below 50% after his first election (before 9-11), it was a huge deal that was reported all over the msm and the late night idiots (leno, letterman, conan) made jokes about it for days. Think any of that will happen now with obama? Yeah, me neither.

clearbluesky on July 26, 2009 at 4:56 PM

simplesimon on July 26, 2009 at 4:33 PM

Whistling in the dark.

atheling on July 26, 2009 at 4:59 PM

Rasmussen is on Fox News now talking about Obama’s falling poll numbers.

technopeasant on July 26, 2009 at 5:03 PM

I think she asked it knowing he wouldn’t be able to resist taking the bait.

Ed Morrissey on July 26, 2009 at 10:41 AM

Bumpty Odumpty spoke as a racist in a soul revealing judgment call
Bumpty Odumpty had a great fall
All the tyrants media sycophants and all the tyrants Axelrod and Rahm con men
Can’t put Bumpty Odumpty’s mask back on again

Cheshire Cat on July 26, 2009 at 5:04 PM

I remember when Bush’s approval rating fell below 50% after his first election (before 9-11), it was a huge deal that was reported all over the msm and the late night idiots (leno, letterman, conan) made jokes about it for days. Think any of that will happen now with obama? Yeah, me neither.

clearbluesky on July 26, 2009 at 4:56 PM

Also, libbies would later say that if it wasn’t for 9/11, Bush wouldn’t have been reelected, based solely on that 6 months of polling.

Speedwagon82 on July 26, 2009 at 5:28 PM

Downside: It’s Zogby. Upside … well, it’s Zogby

And for Obama,

The good news: Tomorrow’s another day

The bad news: Tomorrow’s another day

Mr_Magoo on July 26, 2009 at 5:57 PM

Gates is on Fox right now and said that Obama did know that the question about the Gates incident was going to be asked. People, he was NOT caught unaware about the question, ugh.. this just makes his response even worse to me.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 6:21 PM

Gates (Oops, I meant Gibbs) is on Fox right now and said that Obama did know that the question about the Gates incident was going to be asked. People, he was NOT caught unaware about the question, ugh.. this just makes his response even worse to me.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 6:27 PM

Not a surprise that he knew. He sounded like he knew. He carved out time at the end of the speech by short shifting the questions on transparency. Purposefully had a 55min deadline for all the other softballs, just so he could get to Lynn Sweet and her pre-planned notecard.

ted c on July 26, 2009 at 6:29 PM

Sure he knew. It was calibrated calculated.

CWforFreedom on July 26, 2009 at 6:47 PM

Gates … is on Fox right now and said that Obama did know that the question about the Gates incident was going to be asked. People, he was NOT caught unaware about the question, ugh.. this just makes his response even worse to me.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 6:27 PM

Just as some of us figgered, Obama’s answer to Sweet’s question was no unwitting slip. It was prepared in advance.

Yes, all the more chilling than if an unwitting slip:

- To cast Crowley’s behavior and the Cambridge police as iconic of a prevailing white police racism was planned in advance.

- To cast it as anecdotal of a prevailing racism and a prevailing practice of white cop profiling was planned in advance.

- To bash the Cambridge police action as ’stupidity’ was planned in advance.

- To cast it as an issue of race, white cops versus black and white cops versus brown, was planned in advance.

Alinsky would be proud.

By this Obama, our ‘post-racial’ president, has telegraphed us that he will foment racial tension, as did others in the 20th Century, as expedient to advance his agenda.

Danger here. Serious danger.

petefrt on July 26, 2009 at 7:10 PM

Gates … is on Fox right now and said that Obama did know that the question about the Gates incident was going to be asked. People, he was NOT caught unaware about the question, ugh.. this just makes his response even worse to me.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 6:27 PM

I’m talking to Tapper now about this and told him what u said. Did you see Gibbs on Fox just now, live? Who was he speaking to? Or was it a re-play from a morning interview? tks.

JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 7:20 PM

Here’s a Fox summary of Gibbs’ interview. I don’t read it as Ogabe being prepped for the question. I read it as he and staff went over their plan for the presser and he was, of course, aware by then of the Gates incident.

I simply don’t believe Lynn Sweet’s question was a set-up or that Ogabe prepared his response. I read it as his usual arrogance, thinking he could get away with anything and then, in true un-promptered form, he stepped in it, revealing who he really is – which, of course, the HA family has known from day one.

http://fns.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/07/26/gibbs-talks-gates-controversy-health-care-reform/

guntotinglibertarian on July 26, 2009 at 7:39 PM

guntotinglibertarian on July 26, 2009 at 7:39 PM

Tapper gave me a link to lynnsweet’s blog where she tells her side of the story.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/07/the_story_behind_my_obama_pres.html

JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 7:41 PM

Brett Bahr said that they were aware of the question beforehand and had prepared for it and Gibbs did not dispute it.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 7:51 PM

Gibbs was on the Fox News Sunday show at 6:00pm EST. The comment was made in the first 5 minutes. Later, it was discussed at length by the panel.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 7:57 PM

What an unpresidential, nasty, small thing to say. Obama is just an embarrassment.

MochaLite on July 26, 2009 at 7:58 PM

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 7:51 PM

Tks. will try to see if I can get transcript of him saying that. Seems like that makes quite a difference esp. since everyone else, including Sweet, is denying that, and insisting that obama only prepared for a variety of questions. I don’t believe it either, but still, proof is needed.

JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 8:04 PM

The poll I’m remembering showed 76% support public option.

AnninCA on July 26, 2009 at 11:19 AM

Sorry for re-posting your stuff, but some others may not have seen it, and I thought they deserved a good laugh too.

Squiggy on July 26, 2009 at 8:08 PM

No transcript on Fox site. Fox News Sunday runs on Hulu, but they don’t have today’s edition up yet.

guntotinglibertarian on July 26, 2009 at 8:15 PM

Did you see Gibbs on Fox just now, live? Who was he speaking to? Or was it a re-play from a morning interview? tks.

JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 7:20 PM

I saw it. Gibbs was replying, trying to weasel but finally cornered, to a direct question as to whether Obama’s reply to Sweet’s question had been anticipated and managed in advance. I wasn’t watching the show until this came up, but as I recall, it was Brett who asked the question. No, I think it was clearly not a replay of a morning interview.

petefrt on July 26, 2009 at 8:23 PM

I might be wrong, but I don’t believe black people who say they voted for him in ‘08 but won’t again.

They’ll forget about the Gates thing, and be brainwashed and indoctrinated by their friends and media to vote for him again.

The people who will defeat Obama in ‘12 will be the indies.

B Man on July 26, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Brett Bahr said that they were aware of the question beforehand and had prepared for it and Gibbs did not dispute it.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 7:51 PM

Yes. Not only did Gibbs not dispute it, he clearly seemed to concede it.

petefrt on July 26, 2009 at 8:30 PM

Yes, and the panel discussed the fact that Gibbs did say that they had prepared for that question from Sweet. It was 37 minutes into the show.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 8:41 PM

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 8:41 PM

So to me at least, it seems indisputable that our post-racial president intentionally tried to stir the race pot, gratuitously, and that it was a clearly premeditated maneuver.

Now that we know he did it intentionally, the only speculation is why.

petefrt on July 26, 2009 at 8:49 PM

simplesimon on July 26, 2009 at 4:33 PM

O’bama and Biden won 70 percent of the votes of high school dropouts like yourself, something no candidates had ever done before.

Are you proud of that particular result?

Del Dolemonte on July 26, 2009 at 9:01 PM

Now that we know he did it intentionally, the only speculation is why.

petefrt on July 26, 2009 at 8:49 PM

To intimidate those of us who oppose him. What is the response we get whenever we criticize this fraud? “RACIST!!!”

It’s designed to keep our mouths shut.

atheling on July 26, 2009 at 9:02 PM

I think it is because Obama mistakenly thought he was above the fray. He actually believes the public has bought into his own rhetoric about him being a post racial President when in reality, we were seeing the real Obama, the community organizer.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 9:04 PM

I remember when Bush’s approval rating fell below 50% after his first election (before 9-11), it was a huge deal that was reported all over the msm and the late night idiots (leno, letterman, conan) made jokes about it for days. Think any of that will happen now with obama? Yeah, me neither.

clearbluesky on July 26, 2009 at 4:56 PM

Actually, Bush only dipped below 50% in that time frame in 2 out of 10+ polls. In one of them he was at 47%, the other 49%. But even then, you’re right. He was held to a different standard, but what do you expect? All of them voted for him, after all!

Del Dolemonte on July 26, 2009 at 9:12 PM

I think it is because Obama mistakenly thought he was above the fray. He actually believes the public has bought into his own rhetoric about him being a post racial President when in reality, we were seeing the real Obama, the community organizer.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 9:04 PM

In other words, the filthy liar is guilty of believing his own propaganda. I tend to agree on the basis of that trainwreck of a presser last Wednesday. He didn’t say anything new but thought his very appearance on tv would be enough to sway public opinion. He is a very sick individual.

The irony is that, instead of opining on the Cambridge PD, had the filthy liar suggested Gidget the Taco Bell dog would have been saved by his healthcare scheme he would have come out ahead of where he is. The non-apology on Friday makes it clear that the filthy liar really doesn’t get why his racist statements are still in the news cycle. That is a mark of one disassociated with reality.

Random thought…. Is there something out there to remove a President for being mentally insane? I think it can be done if the cabinet signs the document transferring control. I really think it time that such eventualities be explored.

highhopes on July 26, 2009 at 9:25 PM

All the racial tension Obama is creating is about one thing-reparations. Whether it’s free medical care or union jobs or Americorp, it’s about pay back for slavery and oppression of “his” people.

By the way, David Axelrod is the most dangerous person in America.

ndulik on July 26, 2009 at 9:26 PM

None of his support groups like the cops either. I said it before: Just wait for the 4.6 million pardons he grants as he leaves office.

IlikedAUH2O on July 26, 2009 at 9:29 PM

The people who will defeat Obama in ‘12 will be the indies.

B Man on July 26, 2009 at 8:26 PM

They put him in office and they can help take him out. I say helped because the real reason why the filthy liar got elected is that the GOP fractured itself. If the Republicans had put up a candidate the majority of the base could have gotten behind to the point of grass roots enthusiasm, then the filthy liar would have lost. Instead they put up McCain and his virtually identical message to the filthy liar. The key to victory for the right in 2010 and 2012 is full throated opposition not the crap McCain pulled about wanting to do all the same things but just less intense.

highhopes on July 26, 2009 at 9:30 PM

Racists hate The One and terrorists hated President Bush. Not many libs were called terrorists, though.

IlikedAUH2O on July 26, 2009 at 9:32 PM

I said it before: Just wait for the 4.6 million pardons he grants as he leaves office.

IlikedAUH2O on July 26, 2009 at 9:29 PM

I suspect you are wrong for only one reason. He’s whining about his presidency being destroyed over a loss on healthcare reform. The filthy liar in the White House will not want to go down as the bastard who exonerated 4.6 million criminals. He has too much post-presidency time and is too much of a narcissist to become politically toxic by his actions.

highhopes on July 26, 2009 at 9:33 PM

“Random thought…. Is there something out there to remove a President for being mentally insane? I think it can be done if the cabinet signs the document transferring control. I really think it time that such eventualities be explored”.

highhopes on July 26, 2009 at 9:25 PM

The problem is that the majority in the cabinet are infected with the disorder too.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 9:41 PM

So to me at least, it seems indisputable that our post-racial president intentionally tried to stir the race pot, gratuitously, and that it was a clearly premeditated maneuver.

I could have predicted the answer with 100% certainty. It is BHO who wants to lecture the collective public about racism and he points it out around every corner whether it’s there or not.

Yes, there is still racism in this country, but there are also those that taunt people because of their weight, all sorts of discrimination against women, discrimination against gays, against religious beliefs and the list goes on and on. Do I like it? Nope. Is it unfair? Yep. But sorry folks, it’s LIFE.

Once again, if you run around expecting to be a victim, guess what – you WILL be a victim.

katablog.com on July 26, 2009 at 9:47 PM

Yes. Not only did Gibbs not dispute it, he clearly seemed to concede it.

petefrt on July 26, 2009 at 8:30 PM

Well, Lynn Sweet had a column today clearly stating that The Won had no idea this was coming. She submits that she was called by the White House, told she might be called on, and to prepare a question. She maintains that the the WH did NOT schedule this as a pure health care forum and hence, her question. How do we square this with what gibbsy is saying

ted c on July 26, 2009 at 9:50 PM

The people who will defeat Obama in ‘12 will be the indies.

B Man on July 26, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Maybe 95% of whites will vote for the white candidate?

Partisan on July 26, 2009 at 9:55 PM

I meant to include the latest Zogby polling, released on Friday. Downside: It’s Zogby. Upside … well, it’s Zogby:

A new Zogby Interactive survey…

There’s no real upside. I trust Zogby Interactive about as far as I can throw it. Those 4,500 are self-selected respondents, not randomly-selected people.

Wake me up with the non-Interactive part of Zogby (or somebody else) confirms the Rasmussen polling trend.

steveegg on July 26, 2009 at 10:04 PM

They put him in office and they can better help take him out.

highhopes on July 26, 2009 at 9:30 PM

FIFY. Those morons deserve to have their collective heads shaved. They better redeem themselves.

atheling on July 26, 2009 at 10:05 PM

Partisan on July 26, 2009 at 9:55 PM

Didn’t happen in ‘08.

B Man on July 26, 2009 at 10:31 PM

The problem is that the majority in the cabinet are infected with the disorder too.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 9:41 PM

I disagree. The cabinet positions have devolved from their original intent. In the time of the founding fathers, the cabinet was akin to the royal councils that advised the colonial governors. These days, cabinet officials are nothing more than political rewards or strategic alliances. Hillary Clinton, for example, has no business being SECSTATE. Where once these individuals were the ones who would have told the President he had no clothes, these days they are more apt to go in front of the cameras and defend the nakedness.

highhopes on July 26, 2009 at 10:35 PM

By this Obama, our ‘post-racial’ president, has telegraphed us that he will foment racial tension, as did others in the 20th Century, as expedient to advance his agenda.

Danger here. Serious danger.

petefrt on July 26, 2009 at 7:10 PM

It won’t happen but I would LOVE to see Sgt Crowly slap jugears with a multi million dollar defamation suit.

bullseye on July 26, 2009 at 10:36 PM

Those morons deserve to have their collective heads shaved. They better redeem themselves.

atheling on July 26, 2009 at 10:05 PM

Not disagreeing with that. Everytime I see a car still sporting an Obama bumper sticker, I equate it with “moron on board.”

highhopes on July 26, 2009 at 10:37 PM

It won’t happen but I would LOVE to see Sgt Crowly slap jugears with a multi million dollar defamation suit.

bullseye on July 26, 2009 at 10:36 PM

Right idea, wrong approach. The filthy liar in the White House needs to be slapped with a defamation suit but it can’t be for financial gain of any individual or organization.

highhopes on July 26, 2009 at 10:41 PM

David Axelrod is the most dangerous person in America.

ndulik on July 26, 2009 at 9:26 PM

Footnote: his parents were communists.

Lourdes on July 26, 2009 at 10:53 PM

Well, there was a reporter interviewed on Fox from Cambridge. She said that it is law that the tapes have to be released if there is an investigation. The mere fact that the Police Dept wants to pursue this further leads me to believe that they feel confident about the procedures taken by Crowley. In my opinion, the only profiling that was done, was by the Professor.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 10:55 PM

David Axelrod is the most dangerous person in America.

ndulik on July 26, 2009 at 9:26 PM

Footnote: his parents were communists.

Lourdes on July 26, 2009 at 10:53 PM

So were Obama’s.

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 10:56 PM

Conservalicious on July 26, 2009 at 10:56 PM

Yes, I know. ;)

In fact, Geitner’s father “worked with” Obama’s mother…the entire Obama-effort is literally saturated if not crafted out of communism. The alarming point to my view is why it doesn’t alarm more Americans.

Lourdes on July 26, 2009 at 11:04 PM

Impeach.

hawkdriver on July 26, 2009 at 11:15 PM

Everytime I see a car still sporting an Obama bumper sticker, I equate it with “moron on board.”

highhopes on July 26, 2009 at 10:37 PM

Me too. Makes me mutter under my breath. But I have noticed that I don’t see as many of those bumperstickers lately…

atheling on July 26, 2009 at 11:15 PM

Rasmussen: Obama strong disapproval rises; Update: Zogby shows Obama at 48%

The pitiful thing is that despite the low numbers for Obama, folks aren’t considering the alternatives. Sure, some will say, “oh, well look at what the Republicans are offering.” I ask, what did they offer? McCain for President? Maybe “conservatives” should get together and put some serious thought into a) finding (or forming) a new party, b) find a leader, c) vote based upon principle rather than believing the lie that they’re wasting their vote on a 3rd-party candidate, and d) work to convince others to do the same.

Send_Me on July 26, 2009 at 11:17 PM

Send_Me on July 26, 2009 at 11:17 PM

There is an army of media standing in reserve waiting to see something or someone like you’re talking about emerge and their mission will be to destroy them.

hawkdriver on July 26, 2009 at 11:26 PM

The strongly-disapprove number has increased five points since the press conference, and the illusion of moderate, post-partisan leadership has been stripped: -Ed

That’s to be expected from a chronic stumble-bum!

“Let’s Roll”

On Watch on July 27, 2009 at 12:09 AM

So, is this country going to have a president with 35% numbers for the next 3 f’in years??

Bush’s numbers never recovered after Katrina (wrongly so) and this country couldn’t wait to get rid of him.

Now it looks like this country has the same exact thing happening to the next POTUS.
I saw the headline at the Beast “Goodbye Sarah!” McFLY!
If those commies think Sarah is gone, well they ARE crazy.

I don’t see him being impeached. I don’t see him resigning, his ego is too huge.
I see the economy not getting better any time soon, at least 10% maybe 11% unemployed….things will not
be improving any time soon for him.

The left won’t turn on him, they’ll just be in denial. I’ve already seen it.

B Man on July 27, 2009 at 12:34 AM

There is an army of media standing in reserve waiting to see something or someone like you’re talking about emerge and their mission will be to destroy them.
hawkdriver on July 26, 2009 at 11:26 PM

And?

Send_Me on July 27, 2009 at 12:43 AM

I doubt we’ll see any prime-time press conferences for a while.

Things just keep looking up!

Jim Treacher on July 27, 2009 at 1:53 AM

Not disagreeing with that. Everytime I see a car still sporting an Obama bumper sticker, I equate it with “moron on board.”

highhopes on July 26, 2009 at 10:37 PM

It warmed my stony little conservative heart Friday evening to see my first car with a half-scratched-off Obama bumper sticker on the back – and this was in NYC!

Fallen Sparrow on July 27, 2009 at 2:04 AM

…Maybe “conservatives” should get together and put some serious thought into a) finding (or forming) a new party, b) find a leader, c) vote based upon principle rather than believing the lie that they’re wasting their vote on a 3rd-party candidate, and d) work to convince others to do the same.

Send_Me on July 26, 2009 at 11:17 PM

There is an army of media standing in reserve waiting to see something or someone like you’re talking about emerge and their mission will be to destroy them.

hawkdriver on July 26, 2009 at 11:26 PM

And?

Send_Me on July 27, 2009 at 12:43 AM

I feel your pain, but,
the conservative objective, as demonstrated by RR’s landslide victory, is to force the GOP to return to its core principles. Creating a 3rd party, while an attractive stick, simply facilitates ‘divide and conquer’ by the statists. Whoever receives the party nomination in 2012, must be a candidate willing to articulate and fight for our founding principles. So far Palin has that high ground, we’ll soon see whether or not there are other candidates who can articulate conservative values, and enlist the base as well as she can.

“Let’s Roll”

On Watch on July 27, 2009 at 7:00 AM

Let me be perfectly clear: Obama’s never seeing 50%+ again.

wildcat84 on July 27, 2009 at 7:52 AM

Let me be perfectly clear: Obama’s never seeing 50%+ again.

wildcat84 on July 27, 2009 at 7:52 AM

Except somehow with ACORN’s help he will win 52% of the vote in 2012. I GA-RON-TEE it.

angryed on July 27, 2009 at 7:55 AM

It warmed my stony little conservative heart Friday evening to see my first car with a half-scratched-off Obama bumper sticker on the back – and this was in NYC!

Fallen Sparrow on July 27, 2009 at 2:04 AM

I used to see a lot of Obama stickers. Now not so much. And the rare time I do see one it’s on a Prius. Unemployment could hit 40% and those morons would still be proudly sporting the Obama stickers as they try to save the environment from non-existent global warming. Sometimes you just can’t stop stupid.

angryed on July 27, 2009 at 7:57 AM

Still hate polls.

I’m guessing soon Obama will denounce all polls as ‘distracting’.

cntrlfrk on July 27, 2009 at 8:13 AM

Except somehow with ACORN’s help he will win 52% of the vote in 2012. I GA-RON-TEE it.

angryed on July 27, 2009 at 7:55 AM

ACORN needs a rightwing counterpart….maybe call it “Walnut”….

sven10077 on July 27, 2009 at 8:30 AM

Obama’s “shock & awe” big bang backfire ignited his roller coaster decline in support. The only question is who’s going to get back on his health dictatorship ride that will require Stimulus II, III, IV, V, another each year.

To oblivion and beyond. Or just say no with a bark backed by bite.

maverick muse on July 27, 2009 at 8:50 AM

There is video of the Louisiana Rep discussing if the health care plan is so great lets see our Representation go on it.

http://sarah-palin-2012.blogspot.com/2009/07/one-size-fits-all-except-pres-veep.html

Dr Evil on July 27, 2009 at 8:56 AM

It won’t happen but I would LOVE to see Sgt Crowly slap jugears with a multi million dollar defamation suit.

bullseye on July 26, 2009 at 10:36 PM

Right idea, wrong approach. The filthy liar in the White House needs to be slapped with a defamation suit but it can’t be for financial gain of any individual or organization.

highhopes on July 26, 2009 at 10:41 PM

Thanks for reminding me that I had forgotten my History. You are absolutely correct. Theodore Roosevelt sued a newspaper owner for slander. Not sure if he was president at the time or not. Anyway, TR won. When they were getting around to the damages, all TR wanted was the cost of a paper.. something like 5 cents. He said his goal was not to ruin the man but to clear his own name.

OF course, TR was a very astute politician and the concept you mentioned probably crossed his mind.

bullseye on July 27, 2009 at 9:04 AM

ACORN needs a rightwing counterpart

sven10077 on July 27, 2009 at 8:30 AM

The illegitimate ACORN has a LEGITIMATE counterpart that legally has more standing, the Libertarians.

You are promoting the old mantras that projected falsely the propaganda that referenced Fascism as the “far right”, though it was only the far right of Socialism, right-of-communism, but still far-left-of-center.

Constitutional legitimacy can not be re-established via socialism.

The conservatives simply need to convincingly, actively maintain their RIGHT to maintain Constitutional integrity, having legal precedence with the supreme law of the land over all subsequent progressive socialist legislation and litigated corruption.

It takes ignorant sub-morons to dismiss the entire Libertarian platform premise because of a vocal tangent within that has yet to study metallurgy.

Victory requires alliances that are contingent upon selective mutual respect.

maverick muse on July 27, 2009 at 9:04 AM

bullseye on July 27, 2009 at 9:04 AM

Obama’s leftist journalists this month have been attempting to equate BHO with Teddy Roosevelt, having failed to measure up to JFK and FDR. It’s Woodrow Wilson they need to admit re-making via Obama. It is such an insult to T.Roosevelt’s legacy to be usurped and corrupted by the Democrats today.

Sue the professor AND YALE for real effect!

Winning, make Yale retract the “Black” racist curriculum, fire the professor for promoting ignorance and racial hatred (make him lose his personal fortune in the suit), and re-establish the NEW renaissance of classical education, including “sensitivity training” of leftists to respect conservatives. Rescind “affirmative action”.

maverick muse on July 27, 2009 at 9:18 AM

He knew????? I thought he messed up because TOTUS wasn’t ready for it. I cannot say that I am surprised as I believe that he is planting the seeds for civil disobedience down the line. Saying cops act stupidly means it’s ok to not listen to them, right? Like when BO loses in 2012 and rioting begins. (Mark my words on that one! What will be infuriating is that he can address the situation pro-actively as a preventative measure, but won’t because he wants it to happen). Our police risk their lives everyday and deserve more respect than what BO and his Harvard professor friend offered. (I would actually say more in defense of the police, but got the 1st speeding ticket of my life on the way to work this morning…uggghh. I acknowledge that it was my own fault though).

Babyhugger on July 27, 2009 at 10:21 AM

multiple choice:

Is this –

a)Hopeless Change

b) A Ray of Hope

c) Now that’s change we can believe in!!

d) That’s One for the Good Guys – finally!

Sweet_Thang on July 27, 2009 at 10:33 AM

It should also be noted that Professor Gates put his racism on display in front of millions of Americans. The President acted very unpresidential, and Gates acted equally as bad for a so called distinguished Professor. Both of these men had their deep rooted racial bigotry exposed for all to see.

Bad enough to have a Professor exposed as a racist white hater, but to have our President exposed as such… Wow, this is bad.

Keemo on July 26, 2009 at 9:56 AM

Good points!

Imagine if this incident had taken place last October?

Either Obama would have tap danced completely around it, or right now John McCain would be President.

“Imagine…..no Marxists in the White House??”

-John Nikolai Lennon-

Sweet_Thang on July 27, 2009 at 10:42 AM

While his overall job approval remained constant at 49%

That 49% and actually most of those in the disapproval column are still hoping for that free government money, though. They’re just disappointed they haven’t gotten it by now.

The One could go on TV and literally piss on the Constitution and most Americans would ooh and awe over at how far the stream went, and the MSM would have panels about what a healthy prostate gland He must have.

I’ve been thinking that we are indeed an evil, selfish country and we’re getting our just desserts. I have little faith that if we dodge this Marxist bullet we’ll go back to our traditional values, embracing Liberty for ourselves and the oppressed of the world, and at least the acknowledgment that there is something, someone out there greater than Man.

We’d just vote in Carter III twenty years down the road and give failure yet another shot, because we’ll feel we weren’t getting enough from the government and everyone else.

Dr. ZhivBlago on July 27, 2009 at 10:56 AM

Sing with Paul Simion … “Slip slidin’ away…Slip slidin’ away…”

CynicalOptimist on July 27, 2009 at 12:45 PM

This confirms the 50% favorable revealed by the PPP on July 20th and 48% revealed by Zogby late last week.

technopeasant on July 27, 2009 at 12:45 PM

hmmmn….does anyone know if Crowley’s agreed to the beer yet. Is he just going to roll over, or am I a bit slow?

Fortunata on July 27, 2009 at 3:13 PM

What an unpresidential, nasty, small thing to say. Obama is just an embarrassment.

MochaLite on July 26, 2009 at 7:58 PM

A “leg-tingling” embarrassment? I am hoping the up-coming Hussein collapse takes down his lie-enabler Matthews and his ilk with it. But just watch as they soon distance themselves from this embarrassment.

leftnomore on July 27, 2009 at 3:40 PM

hmmmn….does anyone know if Crowley’s agreed to the beer yet. Is he just going to roll over, or am I a bit slow?

Fortunata on July 27, 2009 at 3:13 PM

Cops do like their beer. He’d be on TV too!

leftnomore on July 27, 2009 at 3:40 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5


You must be logged in to post a comment.