Rasmussen: Obama strong disapproval rises; Update: Zogby shows Obama at 48%
posted at 9:50 am on July 26, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Rasmussen has its first tracking poll taken with numbers entirely generated from after Barack Obama’s trainwreck press conference, and to no one’s surprise, his numbers have continued to decline. While his overall job approval remained constant at 49%, those who strongly disapprove of Obama’s performance increased again to 40%, while those who strongly approve retreated to 29%. The strongly-disapprove number has increased five points since the press conference, and the illusion of moderate, post-partisan leadership has been stripped:
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows that 29% of the nation’s voters now Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -11. That’s the first time his ratings have reached double digits in negative territory …
These updates are based upon nightly telephone interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. Today is the first update based entirely upon interviews conducted after the President’s prime time televised press conference. The number who Strongly Approve of the President has remained unchanged since the press conference but the number who Strongly Disapprove has gone up by five percentage points (from 35% on Wednesday morning to 40% today). …
The President is now seen as politically liberal by 76%. That’s up six points from a month ago, 11 points since he was elected, and the highest total to date. Forty-eight percent (48%) now see him as Very Liberal, up 20 points since he was elected.
Tax-and-spend programs will do that. Ever since Barack Obama arrived in Washington, he’s gone on a Blame America tour abroad and spent money (or at least tried to spend money) at an astonishing rate not seen in decades. America has awoken to the fact that they elected a radical, not a moderate, which they might have known had the media done its job on Barack Obama’s political track record in and out of office, as David Freddoso did in his book The Case Against Barack Obama.
Obama also got hammered on his response to the arrest of Henry Gates. In polling taken on Friday and Saturday, after the White House has started its retreat on Obama’s assertion that the police “acted stupidly,” only 26% believed that Obama’s answer was “good” or “excellent”. Sixty-three percent rated it “fair” or poor”, as did 40% of Democrats and 67% of independents. Black voters supported Obama 71%-28%, but they voted for Obama in the last election 96%-4%, which indicates ambivalence even in this demographic (only 21% rated it “excellent”). Obama lost a plurality of the youngest voters, 49%-45%, but lost all others by large majorities ranging from 60%-73%.
But was it right to ask the question in the first place? Lynn Sweet gets second-guessed by a narrow plurality overall, 43%-41%, and most interestingly, by a majority of black voters, 58%-28%.
I doubt we’ll see any prime-time press conferences for a while. I also think it may be a while before Lynn Sweet gets to ask a question at any Obama press briefing.
Update: I meant to include the latest Zogby polling, released on Friday. Downside: It’s Zogby. Upside … well, it’s Zogby:
A new Zogby Interactive survey shows a slight decline in President Barack Obama’s job approval, with 48% of likely voters now approving of the job he is doing as president, down from 51% who said the same in an interactive/telephone hybrid poll conducted in mid-June. Forty-nine percent now say they disapprove of the job the president has done so far in office and 4% are not sure.
The survey found similar results when likely voters were asked specifically to rate President Obama’s performance—47% give him a positive rating, with 22% rating his job performance as “excellent” and 25% rating it as “good.” But slightly more than half (53%) give the president a negative job performance rating, with 10% who say he is doing a “fair” job as president and 43% who say he is doing a “poor” job—up from 36% who said he was doing a poor job in mid-June.
Zogby’s sample is almost 4500 likely voters, with a claimed MOE of 1.5%. Some on the Left claim Rasmussen skews rightward, while those on the Right tend to think of Zogby leaning the other direction. In this case, they’re coming up with the same numbers. Zogby’s polling includes two days prior to the Obama presser; keep an eye on the next survey.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Yes, but I have freely admitted to ODS and birtherism, so you might want to discount my opinions.
JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 10:39 AM
And as the kool-aid wears off and more open their eyes, we should be careful not to rub their noses in it. Just welcome them and say, “we gotta work together and fix this mistake.”
pearson on July 26, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Oh I think not.
HoustonRight on July 26, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Heh, me too I’m afraid.
conservnut on July 26, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Biden won’t be his running mate. Hillary will. There is absolutely no doubt about it. Things were a bit too raw from the primary for him to take her in 2008, but by 2012 she’ll be “the finest Secretary of State this country has ever seen.” AND, they’ll use a clever little “co-presidency” thing, saying she’ll be as powerful as Obama in the administration, particularly on foreign relations, because “she’s the finest Secretary of State this country has ever seen.” They will be touted as America’s “Dream Team,” and the voters will probably fall for it.
Rational Thought on July 26, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Lynn Sweet is a longtime Obama skeptic, so that theory fails right out of the gate. She’s covered him for years in Chicago, and I think she asked it knowing he wouldn’t be able to resist taking the bait.
Ed Morrissey on July 26, 2009 at 10:41 AM
What took so long?
OscarSchneegans on July 26, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Just curious.
Why you’re writing in full sentences today.
And even paragraphs.
Instead of fragments, with lines skipped in between.
Are you sure you’re really you?
*teehee
JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 10:42 AM
Pay attention here.
HE. DOES. NOT. INTEND. FOR. THERE. TO. BE. ANOTHER. ELECTION.
Communists do not leave the fate of their power to the will of the people. Never have. Never will.
MikeA on July 26, 2009 at 10:42 AM
conservnut on July 26, 2009 at 10:36 AM
Definately, he wanted to play on the same thing that got him elected, white guilt. It backfired when he attempted to malign and destroy a decent, good man. If Crowley, was not Crowley, but another white cop, he would have gotten away with it and the cop would be fired, disgraced and destroyed.
This is why it is all so outrageous, Obama has no idea who his constituents are.
tessa on July 26, 2009 at 10:42 AM
Thanks Ed,
conservnut on July 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM
yep…worked too. *haha
AnninCA on July 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Why did O call on her?
JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM
LOL. 10 bucks says we’ll soon be seeing more of Obama with Bo!
pearson on July 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM
By the time he is finally thrown out of office, The Precedent and Traitor-in-Chief will have made personal attacks against every individual white person in America.
Fat, slob Ted Kennedy challenged Carter in the 1980 primaries.
progressoverpeace on July 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Thanks Ed, because I wondered that also.
HoustonRight on July 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM
And at the very time OBama’s poll numbers fall off a the cliff. A little lady resigns and goes on the attack today. Not bad timing for a stupid person. In fact it would appear that Palin COULD NOT HAVE PLANNED IT ANY BETTER. And yet Huck and Mitt are got flat footed and out of the loop. Hmmm imagine that.
unseen on July 26, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Sorry, but I actually consider them traitors. I will never ever forgive or trust them. They placed their feel good BS above the safety and wellbeing of my country and my family. Radical? Maybe, but that is the way it is.
MikeA on July 26, 2009 at 10:45 AM
Doughboy on July 26, 2009 at 10:37 AM
lowandslow on July 26, 2009 at 10:38 AM
Crazy to think that was 30+ years ago (where did it all go). Basically, since Reagan took over in 1980, it just doesn’t happen anymore. I don’t know why, just that somewhere along the way sitting presidents became untouchable. To its credit though, the trend has only backfired once (GHWB). And I don’t see any reason why it would change here: as poor as Obama may do in his first term, why would the Dems run another candidate in 2012 (essentially admitting defeat on BO)? If you’re going down, go down with the guy that got you there.
LastRick on July 26, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Let Me! Let Me!
Because he was feeling cocky!
ericdijon on July 26, 2009 at 10:46 AM
And who exactly would enforce this “martial law”?
The military?
They swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution.
Cops?
They are mostly veterans and mostly local.
National Guard ?
They serve the Governors unless called up.
Let’s not descend into leftist style ravings.
Partisan on July 26, 2009 at 10:46 AM
“If Kennedy runs, I’ll kick his ass.” –Jimmy Carter
backwoods conservative on July 26, 2009 at 10:47 AM
I have to disagree. The Precedent called on her because he wanted to answer her question. It’s not a question of her “being planted” as much as the question being desired, and chosen, by The Precedent. This is not unlike Stalin’s declaration that the vote doesn’t matter so much as the count of the vote.
progressoverpeace on July 26, 2009 at 10:47 AM
One of the main things we have going for us is that this is the lamest bunch of dolts that have ever occupied the White House. My mistake is that I keep trying to make them out to be as conniving and professional as Clinton. But they have shown themselves to be nothing but rank amateurs time after time.
conservnut on July 26, 2009 at 10:47 AM
Given the poll numbers, will this steel the Blue Dogs’ resolve not to allow passage of the Health Care Reform Bill?
This morning the pundits are still saying that San Fran Nan and Barry’s posse are going to try and push it through the House this week.
kingsjester on July 26, 2009 at 10:47 AM
Unless Obama chooses not to run, he will be renominated in 2012 because if nothing else he will hold all the levers of power to make that happen.
If Ted Kennedy couldn’t unseat Jimmy as the nominee in 1980 , it’s not ever happening (at least for the Dems)
jjshaka on July 26, 2009 at 10:48 AM
Exactly.
progressoverpeace on July 26, 2009 at 10:48 AM
Well, he hasn’t gotten that “as well funded as the military” group off the ground yet.:)
Count to 10 on July 26, 2009 at 10:50 AM
Not raving. Just not trusting. And lest you forget, even Officer Crowley has stated that he is an Obama supporter. He’d take you out if Obama told him to.
MikeA on July 26, 2009 at 10:50 AM
LastRick on July 26, 2009 at 10:46 AM
I don’t think it’s happened since Carter is because, let’s face it, the country’s been doing pretty well. When you have massive inflation, unemployment, etc. the political landscape changes fast.
lowandslow on July 26, 2009 at 10:50 AM
If biden is dropped for 2012, it will be blamed on his gaffes but will really be a statement of weakness on Obama. If Obama is strong, then he doesn’t need to dump Biden. If he’s weak then he’ll dump Biden to try and change the dynamic but blame it on Joe in the hopes no one will see it as a move of weakness.
jnelchef on July 26, 2009 at 10:50 AM
The leftists really lucked out with the perfect storm of an economic crisis they at least partially created.
For the people the honeymoon is over, for the SCM it’ll never end.
Fauxbama and the Statist Democrats are reaching a point where they will have to decide where they want to go – BACK to the growth and prosperity of real Capitalism or further to the left off of a cliff.
They think they can take us wherever they want us to go, but that depends on the achievers and producers going along.
Do they really think that the people who pay the bills, the people who produce the capital that they can seize to buy loyalty will follow them off the cliff?
Chainsaw56 on July 26, 2009 at 10:51 AM
As I posted in a prior thread:
Barack H. Obama has transitioned,
FROM:
A POTUS, who happens to be black,
TO:
A black, who happens to be POTUS.
No one should be surprised. He advertised this during the campaign. The MSM did not consider the significance difference between the two descriptions something we should be allowed to contemplate.
Yoop on July 26, 2009 at 10:51 AM
Yeah, it’s pretty clear that Clinton was a much better politician. That’s because he was a lib who actually had to govern a southern state. Obama has no experience governing and did it the Chicago way.
pearson on July 26, 2009 at 10:52 AM
The only way Obama isn’t the nominee in 2012 is if he takes himself out of the running voluntarily(ala LBJ). And Johnson’s situation was more complex due to Vietnam and his ailing health. Dude died right after his 2nd term would’ve ended.
Obama has too great an ego. Afghanistan will never deteriorate into another Vietnam. And he’s only in his late 40′s, so his health won’t force him out(unless he smokes a lot more than we think). He’ll be the nominee in 2012.
On a side note, how would the media ever deal with him not running in 2012 if somehow it came to that? Is it possible for them to eat that much crow?
Doughboy on July 26, 2009 at 10:52 AM
I’m guilty as charged also. You make an excellant point and in many ways makes me a little more optimistic about our country surviving this man.
HoustonRight on July 26, 2009 at 10:52 AM
-
I almost posted about the same thing here the other day… the 30% thing. But things like this give me pause in that thought.
-
Laura Ingram on the Black Chamber of Commerce CEO +
-
I always figured that most black Americans, would never give him up, but his policies will cost us all dearly, and at that point he may just become a thief… in all minds (or at least many).
-
If he is already banging his numbers down this much… Who knows how low he can go.
-
RalphyBoy on July 26, 2009 at 10:52 AM
Yes, they do think that.
MikeA on July 26, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Obama is in a losing situation now, the more he speaks directly to the people about his agenda, the more the people understand he’s not what they bargained for. Keep talking Obama!
I’m really glad that she did ask the question and gave Obama the opportunity to expose his true color and undermine his own myth of being post-racial. I suspect the second guessing reflected in the polls is more about making Obama look bad rather than the question being inappropriate.
What I found most interesting about the entire episode is that Obama wasn’t prepared for that question and when not prepared he does expose his true self. I wonder who in the WH ended up taking the wrath for that mistake.
Texas Gal on July 26, 2009 at 10:53 AM
About HRC, in O’s bid to relegate her status as mush as possible he has inadvertantly given her a great deal of distance from his Admin.
Seriously, how many ‘mericans right now can tell you who the Secretary of State is? I dare say a relative few can tell you it’s Hillary. O has done her an accidental favor by throwing her so far under the bus that no one can see her anymore.
If these poll numbers continue to fall (or just continue to stay where they’re at now) then Hillary could shrewdly resign her post, declare that “this was not the Presidency I knew” and begin setting-up a 2012 run while the Dems tore themselves to pieces. She would garner disaffected Dems and maybe some of the unaffiliated right quick and make O’s life very difficult indeed while acting as the “shadow” Administration questioning everything Barry does.
JoeinTX on July 26, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Could we please have a post on Robert Gibbs on Fox News Sunday discussing the “tonsil” thing????
Paraphrasing:
Host : “Many physicians were highly offended by suggesting they care for patients based on what they are paid and not on their ethical training.”
Gibbs: “Oh, no no no! We just don’t think physicians should treat patients depending on what thay are paid.”
As Sean Hannity says, this IS the most stupid man in Washington DC.
Marcus on July 26, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Et Tu, Lynn Sweet?
JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 10:55 AM
The question is if she’ll last till then.
Phoenician on July 26, 2009 at 10:56 AM
And this is exactly why Bummer objects. Remember, he doesn’t think much of the US Constitution and I’m guessing it applies to any country. How could a guy who has stomped all over the US Constitution in his first six months NOT support another effort to do the same?
Do you really think it was just the Gates matter that quickened the downward slide? I don’t think O’s answer helped (BTW, I think the question was known ahead of time and a plant), but I think the throw “your profit mongering doctor” under the bus was even more egregious.
katablog.com on July 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM
Because he was looking for a familiar hometown face, a life-preserver??
JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Just curious, whereabouts in Houston are you?
conservnut on July 26, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Does anyone think he will run for re-election? I don’t, no way a guy like Obama could take the criticism of his failed policies, not to mention the high risk he faces of losing.
lowandslow on July 26, 2009 at 10:23 AM
He ain’t gonna lose, and he knows it. ACORN and the electoral college, my friend. That, combined with a media that will harp on bogus polls leading up to the election (sampling 50% Ds and 30% D-leaning Is), and the optic will be set to claim victory in 2012. We have one chance only: take the House in 2010 and get some real investigations into ACORN’s activities.
johnny alpha on July 26, 2009 at 11:00 AM
This is what happens when you start to believe what people like Chris Matthews and other like him say the american people want.This is a center right country and will knowing not accept a socialist country or health care system.The only way to get that is to lie and deceive the people.Thank God for HotAir.Rush,Levin and others.The war is not over by a long shot we must keep the pressure on.
thmcbb on July 26, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Y’gotta love Obama’s answer. He joked it up in the beginning, causing him to become comfortable so he then could give us a glimpse of his true self.
pearson on July 26, 2009 at 11:03 AM
A politician once said, “The only poll that matters is the election.” Even if his popularity falls to negative zero, he’s still the one for three and a half long years.
Brian Mallard on July 26, 2009 at 11:03 AM
He will run, he is to arrogant and “calculating” not to.
farright on July 26, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Bellaire SW Houston.
HoustonRight on July 26, 2009 at 11:04 AM
-
It absolutely fits Obastards rhetoric… Remember when,
Barry’s Personal Army Intentions
and the zombies applauded.
-
RalphyBoy on July 26, 2009 at 11:05 AM
The polls do not support your opinion. A large majority DO want reform.
They are, indeed, worried about the cost.
AnninCA on July 26, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Love that Zogby math:
in Zogby World, 48 + 49 + 4 = 100
thirtypundit on July 26, 2009 at 11:07 AM
I’m in Conroe
conservnut on July 26, 2009 at 11:07 AM
I won’t agree with the martial law thing because that would have a backlash that would wake up the rest of America like nothing you’ve ever seen, but I do agree with the first part of the quote.
We already know the absolute disdain bummer has for the American people who dare to disagree with him. What President has ever called We the People “the chattering class”? What president has ever started attacking We the People on the campaign trail with “clinging to their guns and religion”? He went after Wall Street, Bankers, the rich and now doctors.
katablog.com on July 26, 2009 at 11:08 AM
That would ring alarm bells in every state house in the country. The states created the Federal gvmnt. They can uncreate it and any attempt to stay in power by force would ignite a civil war. In which case I believe that 90% or more of the Armed forces (Federal, State, Local) would side with the Constitution.
Uhm, I strongly disagree. While he may personally be a liberal democrat I find it unlikely that he would follow an unlawful order to ‘take out’ a civilian.
Our liberal/progressive/statist democrat friends and family are not evil. They are emotionally manipulated and deliberately misguided. I have hope that some of them can be reached and have the wool pulled from their eyes.
Partisan on July 26, 2009 at 11:09 AM
WRONG. Those that want health care sit at right about 50% but these are people who want their current health care at cheaper rates (and they also want a free lunch). They do not want “health control” by the US Government whether it be Hillary Care or Obama Care.
katablog.com on July 26, 2009 at 11:10 AM
I work near that area.
Doughboy on July 26, 2009 at 11:11 AM
Oh yeah? Where do you live Doughboy?
conservnut on July 26, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Zogby is generally untrustworthy, but that’s just rounding error.
progressoverpeace on July 26, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Sweet! Close enough for conveinence, away from the rat race, and best of all among the trees.
Hey were putting together a caravan to head to D.C. 9/12. Interested? I wanted to fly but friends think it would be fun to go through the states en masse.
HoustonRight on July 26, 2009 at 11:13 AM
heh
conservnut on July 26, 2009 at 11:13 AM
Obama has ACORN to ensure that he does not lose another election. What Zelaya planned to do with that referendum in Honduras is what Obama WILL do in the U.S.
SilentWatcher on July 26, 2009 at 11:14 AM
I would love to, unfortunately my wife and I have reservations for an anniversary trip then.
conservnut on July 26, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Well, gotta run guys, my wife is nagging me to get the yardwork done.
conservnut on July 26, 2009 at 11:16 AM
May be not, his statement sounded like what a military person would say ” I support the president..” etc.
runner on July 26, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Then by all means come along too. Looks like we has a pretty good constituency here.
HoustonRight on July 26, 2009 at 11:19 AM
WRONG. Those that want health care sit at right about 50% but these are people who want their current health care at cheaper rates (and they also want a free lunch). They do not want “health control” by the US Government whether it be Hillary Care or Obama Care.
AnninCA on July 26, 2009 at 11:19 AM
The most famous one was Eugene McCarthy challenging LBJ in 1968. After McCarthy almost beat LBJ in New Hampshire, Bobby Kennedy jumped in as well, seeing how weak LBJ was over the disaster in Vietnam. LBJ wasn’t actively campainging and famously announced he wouldn’t run for reelection in late-March ’68.
As mentioned, Teddy Kennedy ran against Carter in 1980 (the Kennedy’s being opportunistic? I’m shocked!) but really derailed himself right at the beginning of his campaign with a disastrous interview with Roger Mudd, where he couldn’t come up with a rationale for his campaign. Think Palin-Couric times 3 disastrous!
I might have missed a detail or two here, this is off the top of my head.
PatMac on July 26, 2009 at 11:20 AM
Congrats! My big 20th is in October.
HoustonRight on July 26, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Do HuffPo polls count?
HoustonRight on July 26, 2009 at 11:22 AM
sorry, it’s the engineer in me. If I can’t trust Zogby to round properly, how can I trust his mad pollin’ skillz?
/sarc
thirtypundit on July 26, 2009 at 11:23 AM
I think the polls are showing them that they are wrong.
Chainsaw56 on July 26, 2009 at 11:24 AM
Harold Stassen was in the primary against Carter in 1980.
Probably the lowliest but nonetheless one of several challengers to Carter.
Lanceman on July 26, 2009 at 11:25 AM
Zogby leans towards the direction of making headlines…
ninjapirate on July 26, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Don’t forget Pitchfork Pat in ’92 on the R side.
thirtypundit on July 26, 2009 at 11:31 AM
And you base this faith in them on, what, exactly? What have they done to indicate that they are going to be willing to say, “we screwed up and now we want to help undo our mistake”? They lefies I know still seem willing to give hopeandchange more than enough rope to hang us all. Some of those are family too, and that is not an easy conclusion to come to. But I really think they would rather see us all dead than to see their socialist utopia dream collapse.
MikeA on July 26, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Find it hard to believe that Sweet suckered Obama into answering the Gates question. Krauthammer is closer to the truth when he commented that Obama thinks he has carte blanche from the drive by media to opine anyway he sees fit on race. Obama on race is like Joy Behar on any question–he’s self indulgent and thinks he’s a great moralizer. It’s a cover for throwing down the race card and it burned him badly.
wraithby on July 26, 2009 at 11:32 AM
This gaffe of Obama’s reminds me of Bush’s remark about the Schivo case. Remember that? Oh lordy.
AnninCA on July 26, 2009 at 11:39 AM
My family is comprised of both; those who are easily misled/manipulated, and those who are evil. (The “evil” ones, btw, are disgruntled and became socialists because they didn’t rise as high as they expected, and are left with “tearing down” someone else to raise themselves up respectively.)
JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 11:39 AM
Not all of them – some may actually think that this can work -despite the plain fact that IT HAS NEVER WORKED.
At some point they are going to have to wake up and smell the failure, and they will have to make a stark decision where to go from there.
Chainsaw56 on July 26, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Hmm interesting
William Amos on July 26, 2009 at 11:40 AM
The poll I’m remembering showed 76% support public option.
AnninCA on July 26, 2009 at 11:19 AM
You might want to pay attention to who conducted the poll and where it was conducted to come up with those number’s ie,it was BS.
heshtesh on July 26, 2009 at 11:40 AM
The Precedent thinks he can say anything on anything. This situation is exactly like The Precedent’s moronic attempt to turn the screws on AIG executives, only to have the public react to his idiocy and have it pointed out that the Porkulus was specifically desinged to allow the bonuses. This still didn’t stop the Washington junta from sending their SEIU/ACORN goons out in busses to harass the families of the executives, but it did put a lid on things after that.
The Precedent is a moron who has been allowed to get away with idiocy that no one else can. Any normal person with his pea-brain would never have gotten within an inch of Harvard Law, but this fool gets voted Precedent of the law review. The MSM always covers for him and many others are reluctant to call him the moron that he obviously is, but he keeps proving his stupidity by making the same mistake over and over and over.
Just watch, he’ll make this exact same boneheaded move on race in the next two months, acting as if this situation had never happened. The only way that his idiocy will be stopped is if someone turns the whole game on him. It was good of the Cambridge PD to come out swinging, but Crowley needs to not go to the White House. To do that is just to take a part in this Kabuki dance of anti-American stupidity and to let The Precedent and the scumbag Gates off the hook. The proper reaction is to call for Gates to be thrown out of Harvard. The truthful reaction is to call the whole idea of “African-American Studies” departments into question.
And if I hear or read one more PC fool talking about Gates as “a leading black scholar” I think I’m going to lose it. He’s no scholar and he leads nothing. He’s a joke in a joke field.
progressoverpeace on July 26, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Oy. Ann, please stop. I beg of you.
progressoverpeace on July 26, 2009 at 11:43 AM
Pam Geller at Atlasshrugs has been covering this pretty good, but not much other press that I’ve seen.
JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 11:44 AM
Any chance that caravan is coming through KS or we could meet in MO or IL? Might be interesting to throw this out to everyone who wants to join in (well of course unless you want to keep it private).
katablog.com on July 26, 2009 at 11:47 AM
With this as background the reporter in question is then keenly aware of Obama’s long lost Chicago friends–Wright, Ayers etc. Theirs is the business of race victimology or in layman’s terms–race baiters.
Obama had his opportunity for his “Sister Souljah” moment and instead reverted to form, a form learned possibly, in a pew listening to the bigot Rev Wright for twenty years. America, after gasping has turned away. While we could never know his policy incidentals during the campaign we were led to believe/convinced that a half white/half black president could finally put an end to the industry headed by the Wright/Sharpton’s of the world. To say that the broad electorate is now shocked is an understatement as reflected in the recent polls.
If they ever release the audio tapes of Crowley vs Gates it will only get worse for the President.
patrick neid on July 26, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Those would be the Snoop Dog Democrats. After the Blue Dogs and the Yellow Dogs abandon him, the Snoop Dogs will be the only ones left to support him.
atheling on July 26, 2009 at 11:52 AM
That’s a good idea. If we could think of a way to get locations of all those interested in a huge caravan maybe we could stagger departure times, create a route that could have groups join in. By the time we got to Washington even the MSM could not ignore us.
HoustonRight on July 26, 2009 at 11:53 AM
Might want to make a “cancellable” hotel reservation pretty soon. I made mine a month ago and rates in DC were still good, but if this catches on, it may cost you more than you want to pay.
JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 11:53 AM
LOL. HE/she/it’s murder :)
JiangxiDad on July 26, 2009 at 11:56 AM
Humpty Dumpty… Now that the illusion fostered by Obama’s campaign and promulgated by the MSM has shattered, I think he’s pretty much toast.
ProfessorMiao on July 26, 2009 at 11:57 AM
That’s why they pay you the big bucks! :)
HoustonRight on July 26, 2009 at 11:58 AM
In that poll, they didn’t poll likely voters. They polled “adults”.
atheling on July 26, 2009 at 11:59 AM
Interpreting polls is an art, not a science, obviously. I think his sinking polls indicate a reaction, delayed, to the massive infusion the US had to do over the meltdown in the economy.
But he’ll probably survive it.
AnninCA on July 26, 2009 at 12:00 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »