Preview of tonight’s prime-time presser
posted at 1:55 pm on July 22, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Tonight’s prime-time press conference intends to give Barack Obama a chance to communicate directly to the American people about his flailing health-care reform efforts, which have stalled in Congress along with his cap-and-trade bill. As the New York Times reports, it also gives Obama a chance to claim credit for the economy. If that sounds out of touch, the Times doesn’t make it sound any better coming from Rahm Emanuel, emphasis mine:
On Wednesday, Mr. Obama will address the nation in a prime-time news conference. Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff, said in an interview that the president intended to use it as a “six-month report card,” to talk about “how we rescued the economy from the worst recession” and the legislative agenda moving forward, including health care and energy legislation, which squeaked through the House and faces a tough road in the Senate.
That’s a poorly-written sentence. The energy bill squeaked through the House, but ObamaCare hasn’t yet come out of committee. The structure of that last sentence makes it sound as if both had passed in the lower chamber, when the limbo status of the health-care package is one of the reasons why Obama called this press conference.
Putting that aside, the idea that the economy has generated enough good news to claim any sort of credit seems ludicrous to everyone living outside the Beltway. Unemployment continues to rise, and even Obama himself said it would go into double digits this year. Last week, the number of seasonally-adjusted new claims for unemployment was 522,000, while the unadjusted number was 667,000, an increase of over 86,000 from the previous week. Retail sales were up last month, but most of the increase came only from a sharp rise in gas prices.
Does Barack Obama really plan to take credit for this? Does he think Americans feel “rescued” at this point? That claim will mark him as out of touch with the American electorate, while at the same time forcing him to take ownership of the economic crisis and eliminating the “inherited” defense. If Americans had already begun to distrust his acumen on economic policy, this will accelerate that trend mightily.
Update: Keith Hennessey has 20 Questions for tonight’s presser. Here are a couple of my favorites:
- You have said transparency is a top priority. Yet you are calling on Congress to pass a trillion-plus dollar spending bill before CBO has had time to estimate its full effects. In addition, your Administration is delaying release of the new economic projections and deficit estimates until after Congress votes on this massive new spending bill. Will you commit now that you will not ask Members of Congress to vote on this massive new spending commitment until your Administration has met its legal obligation to provide an updated economic forecast and deficit projection, and until CBO has provided Congress with transparent and complete analysis of the bill?
- In a February 2008 debate with then-Senator Clinton you opposed an individual mandate to buy health insurance. In that debate you said, “In some cases, there are people who are paying fines and still can’t afford it, so now they’re worse off than they were. They don’t have health insurance and they’re paying a fine. In order for you to force people to get health insurance, you’ve got to have a very harsh penalty.” Now you are supporting a bill that would force people to buy health insurance, and that CBO says would still result in eight million people not having health insurance and paying higher taxes. How do you explain to those eight million uninsured people why you now support the mandate and “very harsh penalty” they would have to face, and which you opposed during the campaign?
- The U.S. economy has lost 2.64 million jobs since you took office. The unemployment rate is 9.5% and rising. The good scenario is one in which the unemployment rate begins to decline early next year. The Vice President said your Administration misread the economy. You said you had incomplete information when proposing the stimulus. Yet you have said you would not change anything about the stimulus if you could. If the facts have changed, why doesn’t it make sense to change your policy?
How many of these will actually get asked by the White House press corps? Print out Keith’s post and use it as a scorecard.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Fantastic list. I better have the ambulance waiting on my front lawn….
HornetSting on July 22, 2009 at 2:29 PM
It should be interesting to see how many of his replies to the questions that are asked are in direct contradiction to his initial comments. He doesn’t strike me as being very good at adapting to a situation, so after he makes his prepared remarks, it’s ‘anything goes.’
If we had a press corps willing to put his feet to the fire, I’d be more inclined to watch.
Tonus on July 22, 2009 at 2:29 PM
Rush is noting that the WH is pitting the congressmen against their constituents…
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 2:30 PM
I keep things simple…I just drink the entire time he’s on the air…
ladyingray on July 22, 2009 at 2:30 PM
Random thought. Since Obami is going to have his millionth presser in six months, I bet Bret is going to cancel his Wednesday night online edition. Argh!!!!
Lance Murdock on July 22, 2009 at 2:30 PM
Yes it is cancelled for tonight.
ladyingray on July 22, 2009 at 2:31 PM
i will put in the Friday the 13th movie where the dumb b**ch hides from jason in a sleeping bag and he picks her up by her feet and slams upper body and head into a tree. i will imagine that she is nancy pelosi and i will smile!
Ghoul aid on July 22, 2009 at 2:31 PM
I’d rather watch humping robot videos than watch another Obambi ego fest!
Ed, I noticed a new robot post in the headlines, is that what AP was doing when he was gone, petitioning robot manufacturers to come out with the perfect beta male companion?
Just askin…
Liberty or Death on July 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM
war at the AMA–physicians revolting, quitting the association….
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM
That’s okay. With the switch to digital, the FCC can now turn on your tv for you! :-0
Just kidding but how close it seems we are getting to the time when these aren’t pressers but simply two-hour speeches in the tradition of all the great dictators.
highhopes on July 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM
Can anyone remember anything about the Hawaiian Health Care Plan?
yoda on July 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM
I MIGHT be able to make myself DVR it, for any lib friends who’d heard it entirely differently, but PLEASE have a live blog, so I don’t really have to watch it myself !! EEK.
pambi on July 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM
I don’t plan on watching or drinking.
I’m going to go watch my daughter’s soccer game and then take all of my kids to Dairy Queen, maybe sit on the porch afterward and play a game with them.
I don’t need to soil my existence by watching and listening to a pouting fool extol the virtues of national destruction.
Bishop on July 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM
It will be fun to see who Obama calls on and how many plants from sympathetic sites like HuffPo and Daily Kos make it into the front row of the pressroom.
The big media still truly wants to help Obama succeed, but their White House correspondents also have big egos, and think they earned their way into the front rows — when they don’t, they act like a jealous girlfriend. If Obama and his handlers are dumb enough to repeat the mistake of the last two prime-time newsers and jump liberal website bloggers ahead of them in the question line, there’s a chance he might actually get grilled like a normal president tonight, once he has to finally start calling on the regular media reporters.
jon1979 on July 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM
I have a spark of hope that he might get a question tonight requiring him to wipe his brow or do a facepalm….
that’d be worth the price of admission….
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM
Over the way the filthy liar strong-armed them into an endorsement?
highhopes on July 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM
“Big O, it’s Showtime!”
Blacksmith on July 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM
Sounds like a plan!
HornetSting on July 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM
Bishop on July 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM
Man, I love those peanut buster parfets….
ladyingray on July 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM
.
Shhhhhhhh…..don’t say this out loud – he might reconsider….let him try it!!!
dont taze me bro on July 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM
When did healthcare become a right anyway?
How about those people stuck watching small TV’s? Their eyesight may worsen and they couldn’t see The One.
How about those people stuck in Honda Civics? Don’t they have a right to a safer car like a new Benz or Caddy?
How about those people stuck in small frame houses with asbetos? Mesothelioma. They burn easily, too.
And then we have water supply problems..
IlikedAUH2O on July 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM
Yep, but you can listen to AM790 – KABC and snicker along with Mark Levin!
jbh45 on July 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM
We need a party tonight…
ladyingray on July 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM
Barry needs a major distraction to draw attention from his total failure of healthcare reform. Since the dimocrats are masters at racial hatred and class warfare, which avenue do they take us down? Is it because he’s black that the healthcare reform is being criticized or because the haves want the have-nots to suffer at their expense? We do not need this garbage, but you can’t rule it out. Lies and deceptions can only take you so far and then you have to return to your base. Hate is their specialty.
volsense on July 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM
is he going to show the press his “OOOOO” face..
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM
Well I guess that is marginally better than watching the filthy liar make love to the TOTUS. In either case you get to see two lifeless entitites getting in on with one another.
highhopes on July 22, 2009 at 2:36 PM
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM
.
Uhh…I’m eating here.
dont taze me bro on July 22, 2009 at 2:36 PM
Party tomorrow night in the QOTD thread to be hijacked for the Hawk.
pass it on…..
Knucklehead on July 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM
at least TOTUS had a soul and a conscience….
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM
Bigger than a sleeveless Michelle Obama taking the kids and dog for a walk on the National Mall?
highhopes on July 22, 2009 at 2:38 PM
may he RIP
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 2:38 PM
Posters on buildings also help. Chairman Mao used a lot artists to help him be seen.
seven on July 22, 2009 at 2:38 PM
The dirty fact that even the bill’s opponents don’t want to mention is that you have a hard time finding $500,000 to take care of someone who has paid $35 in taxes their whole lives. Not even considering the 300% markup that the government needs on everything they run.
The money has to come from somewhere. Sometime.
IlikedAUH2O on July 22, 2009 at 2:38 PM
No, that’s the adoring press….’ooooo ooooo ooooo!’
HornetSting on July 22, 2009 at 2:38 PM
I hope the backup TOTUS commits suicide tonight.
BPD on July 22, 2009 at 2:39 PM
Don’t forget to let Cindy know. Party time!
HornetSting on July 22, 2009 at 2:40 PM
YOU MUST READ THIS AND PASS IT ON.
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2009/07/whats-in-healthacre-bill.html
marklmail on July 22, 2009 at 1:5
It is actually much worse. I took a very quick skim through the bill and was struck by the details given for various cares. One thing about modern medicine is that new protocols are developing rapidly and a rigid maintenance to existing protocols will cause many to remain ill and / or die needlessly. Further, there is language somewhere in there where individuals cannot sue the government for treatment. So, unlike the Constitution and the Bill of Rights which are forever being interpreted this bill will be on a level with the Bible; so I guess the “above his pay grade” comment no longer applies.
Regarding cost – if you take the cost and convert it to cost per covered person you get around $4,000 per year in insurance premium equivalent. Given this talk about $8,000 for individual group coverage (which is much lower than individual coverage) as the “gold standard” premium it follows that the public plan will be half of that. So how will costs be covered? Initially it will happen through cost shifting to the private insurers. After they can no longer exist there will be three options:
a) Coverage will be at 50% of current levels via rationing, massive co-pays or deductibles.
b) Higher taxes
c) (a) + (b)
The public plan is massively under priced.
Further, the $240B deficit addition is based on the initial reimbursement rates which are basically Medicare. One of O’s minions was on, I believe Fox, and said this is an opening amount and that the rates would be negotiated (i.e will be higher). Higher rates mean a larger deficit. And while I’m on a roll – that Biden photo op about hospitals taking lower reimbursement rates: Are these the rates used in the $240B figure? If so, these will return sometime. The combination of these two is scary.
Based on $8,000 per uninsured the true cost will be somewhere around:
8,000 x 10 years x 22M people (the amount that will be added from the bill) = $1.8T, not $0.6T. So the added deficit will not be $0.240T but $1.440 Trillion. And that assumes the government will be as efficient as private industry. And this assumes no private plans are replaced with the public option. And … You get my point.
Jed_Eckert on July 22, 2009 at 2:42 PM
Gov. Sarah Palin has signed a joint resolution declaring Alaska’s sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution – and now 36 other states have introduced similar resolutions as part of a growing resistance to the federal government.
posted at wnd and linked at drudge
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 2:42 PM
YOU MUST READ THIS AND PASS IT ON. Sorry, but it’s crucial.
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2009/07/whats-in-healthacre-bill.html
marklmail on July 22, 2009 at 2:42 PM
And that’s precisely why Obambi had him killed; he couldn’t have a weak-kneed TOTUS with a conscience get in the way of his evil plans!
Liberty or Death on July 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM
whoa. thats scary stuff. maybe ap can link it.
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM
That’s why 0bama is going on the air the night before, so the funeral will be covered instead of his lies.
Torch on July 22, 2009 at 2:44 PM
oohhh. great analysis—sinister…
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 2:44 PM
TOTUS had to be related to C3PO
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 2:45 PM
did Obama loosen the screws on TOTUS…. He sure didn’t rush to provide him with aid once he fell—-he didn’t even shed a tear….
i feel sorry for his dog. he probably kicks him
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 2:46 PM
Thanks.
And damn. I always love listening to the K man.
Lance Murdock on July 22, 2009 at 2:48 PM
So when did Obozo send the approved questions to MSNBC?
IntheNet on July 22, 2009 at 2:49 PM
We need a party tonight…
ladyingray on July 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM
Party tomorrow night in the QOTD thread to be hijacked for the Hawk.
pass it on…..
Knucklehead on July 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM
Don’t forget to let Cindy know. Party time!
HornetSting on July 22, 2009 at 2:40 PM
Excellent!
ladyingray on July 22, 2009 at 2:51 PM
Ain’t no way I will be watching this thing. I know the guy will lie to me. BTW, I saw a link over at Instapundit for a good article by a guy named Kotkin on the blue state meltdown. It is very interesting. And the author made an interesting point: blue states are losing population. In the next census, they might well lose reps while red states pick up some representatives. That might effect the balance of power somewhat.
Terrye on July 22, 2009 at 2:51 PM
Here’s my question for the president: it took you six months to pick out a dog, and you still haven’t chosen a new church yet. Why do you do things so slowly and deliberatedly when it affects your own family, but want to rush things that affect mine?
Special K on July 22, 2009 at 2:51 PM
LOL… and I think I’ll play a bit more of Fallout 3…
Post Apocalypse world… where Barrys Economic and Defense policys will lead us…
Figure its good mental training… LOL
Romeo13 on July 22, 2009 at 2:52 PM
“Rush is noting that the WH is pitting the congressmen against their constituents…”
I came to that conclusion myself last night. If cap and tax and Obamacare don’t get passed before the Congress goes into recess and IF the members of Congress continue to be laughed at and otherwise get an earfull from their constituents over the recess, Obama is going to force them into a position where they have to choose between their constituents or The One. Obama’s empty threats and political thuggery isn’t going to hold much water when it comes to a Congress Critter afraid of their access to the Golden Teat.
crosspatch on July 22, 2009 at 2:53 PM
Lance Murdock on July 22, 2009 at 2:48 PM
Rosen needs to develope a Ringo Starr impression…I am impatiently waiting for that.
ladyingray on July 22, 2009 at 2:53 PM
can he speak 6 million languages as well? :-)
cmsinaz on July 22, 2009 at 2:53 PM
haha The man can’t pick out a pair of jeans, why should he pick our healthcare?
faraway on July 22, 2009 at 2:54 PM
And for those of you who want to get Super blackout drunk:
“Look…..”
“Let me be clear”
“Uhm…..”
“Uhh…..”
Rightwingguy on July 22, 2009 at 2:54 PM
Remember Carter’s “Malaise speech” he gave ten years ago? It was supposed to be an energy speech that went terribly wrong when he said that America had a crisis of confidence. Read that portion of the speech below and apply them to tonight’s presser. Carter lost his second term on these words. I would suggest coming from the filthy liar in today’s environment, the pundits would be comparing the speech to one of Reagan’s great oratory. Sorry for the length but worthy of consideration……
The erosion of our confidence in the future is threatening to destroy the social and the political fabric of America.
The confidence that we have always had as a people is not simply some romantic dream or a proverb in a dusty book that we read just on the Fourth of July. It is the idea which founded our Nation and has guided our development as a people. Confidence in the future has supported everything else — public institutions and private enterprise, our own families, and the very Constitution of the United States. Confidence has defined our course and has served as a link between generations. We’ve always believed in something called progress. We’ve always had a faith that the days of our children would be better than our own.
Our people are losing that faith, not only in government itself but in the ability as citizens to serve as the ultimate rulers and shapers of our democracy. As a people we know our past and we are proud of it. Our progress has been part of the living history of America, even the world. We always believed that we were part of a great movement of humanity itself called democracy, involved in the search for freedom, and that belief has always strengthened us in our purpose. But just as we are losing our confidence in the future, we are also beginning to close the door on our past.
In a nation that was proud of hard work, strong families, close-knit communities, and our faith in God, too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption. Human identity is no longer defined by what one does, but by what one owns. But we’ve discovered that owning things and consuming things does not satisfy our longing for meaning. We’ve learned that piling up material goods cannot fill the emptiness of lives which have no confidence or purpose.
The symptoms of this crisis of the American spirit are all around us. For the first time in the history of our country a majority of our people believe that the next 5 years will be worse than the past 5 years. Two-thirds of our people do not even vote. The productivity of American workers is actually dropping, and the willingness of Americans to save for the future has fallen below that of all other people in the Western world.
As you know, there is a growing disrespect for government and for churches and for schools, the news media, and other institutions. This is not a message of happiness or reassurance, but it is the truth and it is a warning.
These changes did not happen overnight. They’ve come upon us gradually over the last generation, years that were filled with shocks and tragedy.
We were sure that ours was a nation of the ballot, not the bullet, until the murders of John Kennedy and Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. We were taught that our armies were always invincible and our causes were always just, only to suffer the agony of Vietnam. We respected the Presidency as a place of honor until the shock of Water gate.
We remember when the phrase “sound as a dollar” was an expression of absolute dependability, until 10 years of inflation began to shrink our dollar and our savings. We believed that our Nation’s re sources were limitless until 1973, when we had to face a growing dependence on foreign oil.
These wounds are still very deep. They have never been healed.
Looking for a way out of this crisis, our people have turned to the Federal Government and found it isolated from the mainstream of our Nation’s life. Washington, D.C., has become an island. The gap between our citizens and our Government has never been so wide. The people are looking for honest answers, not easy answers; clear leadership, not false claims and evasiveness and politics as usual.
What you see too often in Washington and elsewhere around the country is a system of government that seems incapable of action. You see a Congress twisted and pulled in every direction by hundreds of well financed and powerful special interests. You see every extreme position defended to the last vote, almost to the last breath by one unyielding group or another. You often see a balanced and a fair approach that demands sacrifice, a little sacrifice from everyone, abandoned like an orphan without support and without friends.
Often you see paralysis and stagnation and drift. You don’t like, and neither do I. What can we do?
First of all, we must face the truth, and then we can change our course. We simply must have faith in each other, faith in our ability to govern ourselves, and faith in the future of this Nation. Restoring that faith and that confidence to America is now the most important task we face. It is a true challenge of this generation of Americans.
One of the visitors to Camp David last week put it this way: “We’ve got to stop crying and start sweating, stop talking and start walking, stop cursing and start praying. The strength we need will not come from the White House, but from every house in America.”
We know the strength of America. We are strong. We can regain our unity. We can regain our confidence. We are the heirs of generations who survived threats much more powerful and awesome than those that challenge us now. Our fathers and mothers were strong men and women who shaped a new society during the Great Depression, who fought world wars, and who carved out a new charter of peace for the world.
We ourselves and the same Americans who just 10 years ago put a man on the Moon. We are the generation that dedicated our society to the pursuit of human rights and equality. And we are the generation that will win the war on the energy problem and in that process rebuild the unity and confidence of America.
We are at a turning point in our history. There are two paths to choose. One is a path I’ve warned about tonight, the path that leads to fragmentation and self-interest. Down that road lies a mistaken idea of freedom, the right to grasp for ourselves some advantage over others. That path would be one of constant conflict between narrow interests ending in chaos and immobility. It is a certain route to failure.
All the traditions of our past, all the lessons of our heritage, all the promises of our future point to another path, the path of common purpose and the restoration of American values. That path leads to true freedom for our Nation and ourselves.
highhopes on July 22, 2009 at 2:55 PM
Terrye on July 22, 2009 at 2:51 PM
Unfortunately, it’s all about who does the counting.
With ACORN in charge of the census, I wouldn’t put anything past them when it comes to fixing the totals for solidly Dem states.
teke184 on July 22, 2009 at 2:56 PM
I’ll be playing Nazi Zombies on COD 5.
Rightwingguy on July 22, 2009 at 2:56 PM
Bishop, lay off the pretentious banter.
TTheoLogan on July 22, 2009 at 2:57 PM
Oh and a rule you could also follow:
6 drinks in a row for “Pahkestahn”.
It won’t come up, but if it does, I’ll be ready.
Rightwingguy on July 22, 2009 at 2:58 PM
Oh, I wouldn’t put ANYTHING past them. They’ll fix it every way possible. They are profoundly dishonest.
marklmail on July 22, 2009 at 2:58 PM
Dr. Strawman is going to scare the pi## out of you. He is going to parade victim after victim out to exploit. This has nothing to do with saving money. It has nothing to do with helping Americans. This has nothing to do with providing access. This has everything to do with control and the greatest usurpation of individual liberty ever foisted upon this great nation.
He must fail.
daesleeper on July 22, 2009 at 2:59 PM
How about ‘I Won!’?
What’s that get me??? A long shot to be sure…
BigWyo on July 22, 2009 at 3:01 PM
We all know that Obama has a screw loose somewhere.
Steve Z on July 22, 2009 at 3:02 PM
Tonight would be a great night for someone to hack the teleprompter.
crosspatch on July 22, 2009 at 3:02 PM
If you guys haven’t thought of it–please be sure to email/call Grassley and Demints offices and tell them you support them. They’ve shown some bold courage last couple days and need to hear it from the peeps.
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 3:02 PM
21) What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?
Chuckles3 on July 22, 2009 at 3:03 PM
“Let me just be clear” – Double Shot
HarryStar on July 22, 2009 at 3:04 PM
It is amazing how low the bar is set now in declaring policies “successful”.Apparently liberals are so inept that they have to claim unmeasurable and unverifiable platitudes such as “jobs saved” and “we saved the economy” because they can’t show any concrete results from their failed policies.
New barometer of success liberal style:
OBAMA: I SAVED THE ECONOMY!!!!!!!!
This new barometer of success by liberals is great since there is no measurable way to determine what “could have happened”.
I know Detroit fans are a lot happier now.
See how this works,it’s great.
Bush can claim all kinds of success now that the goal posts have been virtually moved out of the dam# stadium.
That’s right,if Bush had not intervened to take out a madman that had started war after war and killed hundreds of thousands of people with WMD’s,all out war would have engulfed the mideast,spreading to all lands that have significant Muslim populations.
According to the liberals new determination of success and accomplishment, Bush can now claim just about anything because proving it could not have happened is impossible.
Now I understand why liberals love the UN so much.It is not the fact that they accomplish nothing,stop no genocide or wars,and their sanctions and condemnations accomplish nothing.
It’s what the UN “Prevents from happening” that is so impressive.
I know the people in Iran,the genocide victims in Darfur,Rwanda,and Iraq all feel so much better knowing what the UN “Prevented from happening.”
And all this time I thought that appeasing Hitler only strengthened his resolve and brought on war.
We didn’t need Chruchill and FDR after all.
It is going to be hilarious watching the Obama administration and their lapdogs in the press peddle this idiotic,unmeasurable line of success because of what “might” have happened.
It was bogus when used with the “150,000 jobs saved” line and it is bogus now.
What a pathetic joke this administration has become in only 6 months.Even having the press in their pocket is not helping them.
Baxter Greene on July 22, 2009 at 3:06 PM
“Rush is noting that the WH is pitting the congressmen against their constituents…”
I believe Rush may be right, that those recent embarrassments are being brought up as threats for quick passage.
However !! Are the congressman ready to risk even
MORE, DEEPER, STRONGER WRATH if they DO pass it before going home ???
Decisions, decisions. hehe
pambi on July 22, 2009 at 3:06 PM
That’s a fargin trick question….Uh, I don’t know…AAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!
Monty Python, classic!
Liberty or Death on July 22, 2009 at 3:07 PM
He is who we thought he was.
faraway on July 22, 2009 at 3:07 PM
Are we changing it to tomorrow instead of Friday?
Cindy Munford on July 22, 2009 at 3:07 PM
is that swallow carrying anything../
ted c on July 22, 2009 at 3:08 PM
Are we changing it to tomorrow instead of Friday?
Cindy Munford on July 22, 2009 at 3:07 PM
Just let me know when…I will be there!
ladyingray on July 22, 2009 at 3:09 PM
Only if they feed in Obama’s resignation speech.
highhopes on July 22, 2009 at 3:10 PM
ObamaCare is tanking in the polls, constituents are openly ridiculing the much-touted “cost-savings” and “efficiencies” and the president is looking desperate and belligerent.
At this point, he can’t be trying to “sell” the program – his main focus should be damage control but I don’t think he knows it yet. He’s too invested to let it go and if he persists and fails, he’ll be a lame duck less than a year into his term (and severely weakened in the eyes of America’s enemies).
At that point, the best he can hope for is that the GOP re-takes the house and/or senate at the mid-term (is that even mathematically possible?) and reign him in like they did with Clinton. If not, his legacy will make Jimmy Carter look like William the Conqueror.
landshark on July 22, 2009 at 3:10 PM
I came here to say this. If he goes forward with saying he’s rescued us from economic disaster… it’s over for him.
Game over, man. Game over.
Enoxo on July 22, 2009 at 3:12 PM
Excellent. A point I couldn’t stress enough. Unverifiable BS is unverifiable. And BS. Idiots.
Thunderstorm129 on July 22, 2009 at 3:14 PM
This is really funny. I was looking for something to watch instead of bho, and TMC a movie on called ‘Waterloo Bridge’ on the same time as our dear bho. It may suck, but not as much as bho.
L
letget on July 22, 2009 at 3:15 PM
Yep, they’re all cut from the same cloth and just like the trolls that comment here on HA they can never come up with any facts just talking points, strawmen arguments, spin, and when all of their BS tactics don’t work they fall back on their tried and true tactic of attempting to discredit you by calling you things like racist, hate/fear monger, etc.
Liberty or Death on July 22, 2009 at 3:15 PM
.
Ding Ding Ding…you are correct, sir!!
dont taze me bro on July 22, 2009 at 3:17 PM
“uh” and “uhm” have been summarily ruled off-limits for drinking games. Those words can be lethal….
BobMbx on July 22, 2009 at 3:19 PM
Recommended alternate viewing choices for tonight:
A Bridge Too Far
Gallipoli
One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest
Mars Attacks
The Empire Strikes Back
Plan 9 From Outer Space
Animal Farm
any other recommendations?
BobMbx on July 22, 2009 at 3:22 PM
You link says it will pay for illegals but, further into the bill it says it doesn’t.
Page 143
SEC. 246. NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED
4 ALIENS.
5 Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments
6 for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are
7 not lawfully present in the United States.
xler8bmw on July 22, 2009 at 3:24 PM
Tour de France.
Cartoon network.
Test pattern.
Blank screen.
NoDonkey on July 22, 2009 at 3:24 PM
Friday works better for me, I don’t work. I need to buy ink.
Cindy Munford on July 22, 2009 at 3:27 PM
The winning comment, which will require chugging the entire fifth will be:
“I believe, in this case, that I know better than the taxpayers what is best for them.”
Yoop on July 22, 2009 at 3:29 PM
Liar. It says no payments for affordability credits.
myrenovations on July 22, 2009 at 3:29 PM
When in doubt… ESPN.
Red Sox/Rangers
BPD on July 22, 2009 at 3:29 PM
Hit submit too fast…
Affordability credits are totally different than paying for the insurance of illegal aliens.
myrenovations on July 22, 2009 at 3:30 PM
With just a casual reading of the bill line by line it becomes readily apparent that the nexus of the bill has nothing to do with health care. Health care is just the vehicle being used to take us closer to an Orwellian society. All that is missing in this bill is a mandatory tattooed number.
All your personal financial, family and business info will be consolidated and used to make supposed health decisions for you. A committee will have the wherewithal to electronically transfer funds out of your bank account. Your ability to write wills and living trusts will be restrained. Small businesses will be audited at will. All your medical care will be predetermined. All your records will be shared amongst various new and old agencies.
That’s just for starters. Previously these kinds of record access could only be gotten with a warrant under Rico/criminal/IRS standards. Meanwhile all current and future illegal aliens will get the exact same care for nothing. No fines, no taxes, nothing whatsoever. This will be a huge magnet for middle/senior aged illegals.
Worse still, Pelosi today bragged that she has the votes and this bill is passing the House unread next week. We are being played. All this to placate 15% of the uninsured population while ruining it for the 85% who are basically satisfied.
We need the Repub leadership to dissemble this bill line by line in public on the House and Senate floors while demanding answers from the authors.
patrick neid on July 22, 2009 at 3:31 PM
Thats from marklmail’s link…
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?
Some other gems include they will have full access to your bank accounts to take money for health care. (Pg 59 HC Bill lines 21-24), Pg 195 HC Bill -officers & employees of HC Admin (GOVT) will have access 2 ALL Americans finan/pers recs, and lots off other fun items like Feds telling doctors what the can make, illegal aliens (they are not immigrants, they are invaders and should be treated as such) get free health care (since it also says that non residents do not pay the tax that isnt a tax), and rationing all over the place (including seniors and special needs).
Can we start the revolution yet?
Wolftech on July 22, 2009 at 3:32 PM
If you want the press corps to laugh at Obama on national TV, load that into TOTUS, Rahm. They’ve been laughing at Gibbs when he says stuff that is wack, so don’t think they won’t laugh tonight at the One.
smellthecoffee on July 22, 2009 at 3:32 PM
I can hear it already, “As you know, many of these are issues that we inherited from the previous administration…” It will be there in one form or another.
CynicalOptimist on July 22, 2009 at 3:32 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »