A Khamenei-Ahmadinejad split?

posted at 4:37 pm on July 22, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

This weekend, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad created a fury among his rapidly declining set of supporters by appointing his son’s father-in-law, Esfandiar Rahim Mashai, as first vice president, a key position within the Iranian government.  Today, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei publicly rebuked the man he claims was divinely granted a victory in a rigged presidential election by reversing the appointment:

Iran’s supreme leader handed a humiliation to the president, ordering him to dismiss his choice for top deputy after the appointment drew sharp condemnation from their hard-line base, media reported Wednesday.

The move by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei appeared to show his need to keep hard-liners’ support even at the cost of angering the president, a close ally — at a time when Khamenei is facing unprecedented opposition after the disputed June 12 election.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s appointment for his top vice president sparked a rare split within the hard-line camp to which he belongs. A chorus of ultra-conservative clerics and politicians denounced his choice, Esfandiar Rahim Mashai, while Ahmadinejad had strongly defended the appointment.

However, Ahmadinejad has indicated that he may refuse to follow the “exalted leader,” as Khamenei’s press release calls him, and keep Mashai in place:

It was not immediately clear if Ahmadinejad would cave in to Khamenei’s order.

Ali Akbar Javanfekr, top media adviser to Ahmadinejad, said on Tuesday that the president won’t change his mind over the controversy. But it was unclear if his comments came before or after the supreme leader’s order.

“The president makes his decisions … within the framework of his legal powers and on the basis of investigations carried out. Experience has proved that creating baseless controversies won’t influence the president’s decision,” Javanfekr said in his blog.

Khamenei has it bad enough when his political opponents openly defy his authority.  The Supreme Leader placed the entire legitimacy of his regime on Ahmadinejad; he can hardly afford to back away from the diminutive president at this point.  However, Ahmadinejad needs Khamenei at least as much as Khamenei needs him at the moment.  The Revolutionary Guard and the Basiji irregulars have backed Ahmadinejad because of Khamenei, not in spite of the cleric.  If ever two people needed each other more for their own survival, a better example escapes me for the moment.

What game is Ahmadinejad playing, then?  He obviously wants to stock the government with people of his own clique, and just as obviously Khamenei sees that as a threat.  Khamenei also has to hold onto as many hardliners as possible, because they’re the only ones backing him at the moment.  Mashai has offended this very clique, and Ahmadinejad’s defiance throws all of their efforts on his behalf in their faces.

Put simply, Khamenei may just be realizing that he’s hitched his wagon to an idiot, not a star, which is why many Iranians wanted to see him leave.  It’s almost as if Ahmadinejad is daring the ruling clique to get rid of him after making such a show about validating his election.  It’s a naked power grab, and a laughable one at that.  If Ahmadinejad doesn’t back away from Mashai, the one man who will benefit from this will be Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, whose attempts to circumvent Khamenei may bear fruit if the Assembly of Experts senses that Khamenei has lost his wits, or at least his grip on Ahmadinejad.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Maybe Andy’s jewish?

JiangxiDad on July 22, 2009 at 4:39 PM

So it’s up to Obama to get these two crazy kids back together, just like Frankie and Annette.

The question is, which one is Annette?

NoDonkey on July 22, 2009 at 4:40 PM

Actually, if Andy and Kham are breaking up, Obama can have Andy and everyone wins :)

JiangxiDad on July 22, 2009 at 4:40 PM

I don’t care how they split up the towels, just how they split up the keys to the nukes.

Vashta.Nerada on July 22, 2009 at 4:42 PM

You were divinely appointed. Your kid’s father-in-law? Not so much.”

Cicero43 on July 22, 2009 at 4:43 PM

Allah I’ve told you since the Saturday after the election this was a Pasdaran coup led by twelvers where the mullahs were sidelined.

elduende on July 22, 2009 at 4:45 PM

Split their heads from their torsos.

pseudonominus on July 22, 2009 at 4:46 PM

Oh, for God’s sake! Won’t somebody please give these poor people The Bomb so Hilary can just love them all to death?

tree hugging sister on July 22, 2009 at 4:47 PM

And so ends another episode of …”As the Muslim World Turns”. Is everyone a little confused as to how things operate in Iran?

Smoke, mirrors, mission accomplished. While we eat popcorn and wonder about tomorrows episode the centrifuges spin almost without notice. Who will win in Iran? The American freedom loving Iranian Muslims or the mad mullah Iranian Muslims? Do nothing, be patient, just watch.

BL@KBIRD on July 22, 2009 at 4:51 PM

Put simply, Khamenei may just be realizing that he’s hitched his wagon to an idiot …

^^That is a beautiful – and truthful line! I LMFAO!

HondaV65 on July 22, 2009 at 4:51 PM

I’ve told you since the Saturday after the election this was a Pasdaran coup led by twelvers where the mullahs were sidelined.

elduende on July 22, 2009 at 4:45 PM

Khami’s been had.

maverick muse on July 22, 2009 at 4:52 PM

Is Exalted Leader above or below Fearless Leader?

Cicero43 on July 22, 2009 at 4:53 PM

I would bet on the guy that really controls the Army and the Revolutionary Guard…..

albill on July 22, 2009 at 4:57 PM

Why would you think Dinner jacket is an idiot?

The clerics broke the damn bank (so to speak) in backing him, and I don’t think he intends to abide by their rules anymore. And why should he? He has the Revolutionary Guard in his pocket and it sounds like Khamenei is stuck with him.

Let’s not forget that of Muslim nutjobs, Ahmadinejad is the chief nutjob. What’s a better way to bring about the freak who fell in the well than by ripping his own country apart and then completely destabilizing the region? Throw a nuke into that and man that’s going to be a nice swift kick in the ass.

John_Locke on July 22, 2009 at 4:58 PM

Is Exalted Leader above or below Fearless Leader?

Cicero43 on July 22, 2009 at 4:53 PM

Depends on whether it’s a special date night.

Laura in Maryland on July 22, 2009 at 5:10 PM

Depends on whether it’s a special date night.

Laura in Maryland on July 22, 2009 at 5:10 PM

You are on fire this afternoon.

thomasaur on July 22, 2009 at 5:14 PM

Meanwhile the protesters are waiting forever to see how this shakes out as their movement fizzles.

The mullahs have been in power for too long; they know how best to play the game. This is nothing, there is power aplenty to share in that domain.

Bishop on July 22, 2009 at 5:15 PM

I One-der if the One will want to “meddle” in this intra-nutjob kerfuffle during his presser tonight.

If I understand this right, Mashai’s daughter is married to AhmaNutJob’s son. It’s a family affair…

Steve Z on July 22, 2009 at 5:24 PM

Put simply, Khamenei may just be realizing that he’s hitched his wagon to an idiot, not a star,

Well, can you blame Khamanei? It’s not as if Ahmadinejad has acted irrationally before.

YYZ on July 22, 2009 at 5:25 PM

My guess is that the street thug, Ahmadinejad, has decided that he no longer wants to play second fiddle to a bunch of old men. Power can be intoxicating. Besides, who do those old men think runs the Revolutionary Guards? Them? Hahahaha.

GarandFan on July 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM

Khamenei has it bad enough when his political opponents openly defy his authority. The Supreme Leader placed the entire legitimacy of his regime on Ahmadinejad; he can hardly afford to back away from the diminutive president at this point.
.
.

Sounds like Obama and Health Care Reform….

percysunshine on July 22, 2009 at 6:06 PM

Could be more complicated. Remember, these are the people who invented chess.

Maybe it goes like this …

Khamenei realizes he needs to get rid of Ahmadinejad but can’t simply nullify the “election” without losing face and admitting it was a farce. So Ahmadinejad is “ordered” to appoint Mashai who is ordered not to refuse the appointment or resign. Ahmadinejad is instructed to “take one for the team” and he will be taken care of later. He is instructed to refuse to fire Mashai which gives Khamenei cause to fire Ahmadinejad for insubordination.

Problem solved. Ahmadinejad is gone without admitting to jiggering election results and people stop rioting in the streets … for now.

crosspatch on July 22, 2009 at 6:07 PM

Problem solved. Ahmadinejad is gone without admitting to jiggering election results and people stop rioting in the streets … for now.

Sooo, Obama is going to blame Congress for giving him a stupid bill….

Ok

percysunshine on July 22, 2009 at 6:10 PM

In other words, never ascribe to incompetence that which can be explained by treachery.

crosspatch on July 22, 2009 at 6:10 PM

In other words, never ascribe to incompetence that which can be explained by treachery.

In the war of explanations for weird stuff…treachery vs. stupidity…stupidity always gets 10:1 odds.

percysunshine on July 22, 2009 at 6:13 PM

Percy, I would say the odds are something like:

incompetence: 50%
treachery: 40%
malice: 10%

In other words, usually incompetence, sometimes manipulation as a means to an end, rarely someone out to genuinely hurt people as their goal.

crosspatch on July 22, 2009 at 6:21 PM

And so ends another episode of …”As the Muslim World Turns”. Is everyone a little confused as to how things operate in Iran?

Smoke, mirrors, mission accomplished. While we eat popcorn and wonder about tomorrows episode the centrifuges spin almost without notice. Who will win in Iran? The American freedom loving Iranian Muslims or the mad mullah Iranian Muslims? Do nothing, be patient, just watch.

BL@KBIRD on July 22, 2009 at 4:51 PM

Nice. May I recommend a slight name change – “As the Centrifuges Spin”?

steveegg on July 22, 2009 at 7:06 PM

As long as no one is asking abou their nuke program, it’s win-win for Mahmoud and Khami.

profitsbeard on July 22, 2009 at 7:13 PM

In the blog photo, why to Iranian chairs have racing stripes?

enoughalready on July 22, 2009 at 9:03 PM

“You were divinely appointed. Your kid’s father-in-law? Not so much.”

Cicero43 on July 22, 2009 at 4:43 PM

;-) Thereby confirming divinity is not conferred transitively in their particular microculture: “So, if God appoints A, and A appoints B, you mean it doesn’t follow that God appoints B? How lame…!”

RD on July 22, 2009 at 11:15 PM

RD on July 22, 2009 at 11:15 PM

Though the empirical data suggests that divine appointment actually shows a transitivity nesting depth of 1 (or 2, depending on how you count it):

If God appoints A, and A appoints B, then God appoints B. But if B appoints C… God disavows all knowledge of said appointment of C, and furthermore retroactively withdraws B (at least at such time as such withdrawal is confirmed by A).

RD on July 22, 2009 at 11:25 PM

Sorry, forgot to mention

A = Hominy
B = Dinnerjacket
C = Brother in-law
——–

KHAMENEI : HOMINY
AHMADINEJAD : DINNERJACKET
RAFSANJANI : ?

I think I’m goin’ with “Rappin’ Johnny”.

RD on July 22, 2009 at 11:30 PM

Seriously, before this new split in Iranian politics and the political marches by students, we have talking head after talking head coming on TV to tell us how smart the Iranians were politically.

Do you remember how so many people queued up to say how Iran was playing America like a violin? How they played a smart game of politics? How they were the best in the region and would make us dumb Westerners (who lack their millenium old civilisation etc.) look like fools?

Its hard to imagine this bunch of half-wits achieving anything expect through blind luck and accident. I have a sneaking suspicion that analysts think if they can make the subject of their analysis seem more sophisticated than they really are it makes them look good, too.

dcpolwarth on July 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM