California fixes its budget – for now

posted at 10:04 am on July 21, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

The state of California has apparently fixed its budget issues, according to a report from the San Francisco Chronicle, and they even managed to listen to the voters this time. The plug for the $26 billion hole involves a series of major budget cuts as well as every accounting gimmick imaginable, but at least thus far no tax increases. The legislature agreed to a desperation move as well — drilling for oil off the coast of Santa Barbara:

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders reached a tentative budget compromise Monday to plug a $26.3 billion deficit by making hefty cuts in education, health and welfare services, and taking billions of dollars from county governments.

The plan also includes allowing an offshore oil drilling project near Santa Barbara, keeping most state parks open and eliminating the Integrated Waste Management Board, which is led by political appointees, many of them former lawmakers, who earn six-figure salaries. Prison spending would be cut, but inmates would not be released early. …

The Legislature is scheduled to vote on the plan Thursday. Approval would allow the state to begin recovering from this latest fiscal disaster, in which it issued IOUs while its credit rating plummeted toward junk-bond status.

“We accomplished a lot in this budget agreement,” said Schwarzenegger, adding that negotiations at times were “like a suspense movie.”

The tentative deal contains about $15 billion in cuts, roughly $4 billion borrowed from local governments and the rest from various accounting gimmicks that include early collection of taxes, increasing withholdings and shifting $1 billion worth of state workers’ pay from the last day of this fiscal year to the next.

So much for the scare tactics of last May. Schwarzenegger and Democrats in Sacramento tried to buffalo Californians into voting for massive tax increases by insisting that failure of the referendums would result in releasing inmates, closing schools, and firing first responders. The electorate responded by voting against the tax hikes by 2-1 margins — and by limiting legislative pay, a proposition that passed with over 70% approval.

It looks as though the legislature and the governor finally got the message, although some of the gimmicks amount to kicking the can down the road. The state will borrow billions from the counties, money that they will have to repay with interest at some point. The cuts to education are also going to be reversed; the agreement sets up a kind of restitution that will bust the budget in 2012.

The most interesting part of the agreement was the reopening of Santa Barbara’s coastline to off-shore drilling. That will raise $100 million a year, which the Drill Here – Drill Now contingent has insisted would help the state balance its budget while lowering the cost of energy and providing jobs. The state has finally agreed, albeit very reluctantly. Ironically, it was a 1969 oil spill off of Santa Barbara that put the effort to ban off-shore drilling in the US into high gear. If California sees a big revenue spike from the new leases, perhaps they will open the entire coast and revive the oil-production industry in the state, and keep that cycle of jobs and energy going.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Eh. Could have cut much more, but maybe they are getting the message.

Vashta.Nerada on July 21, 2009 at 10:06 AM

So much for the scare tactics of last May.

And on a nat’l level, the scare tactics of last August.

jgapinoy on July 21, 2009 at 10:06 AM

So no legalized Mary Jane? Oil instead?

Good trade.

Abby Adams on July 21, 2009 at 10:06 AM

Shocka!

SouthernGent on July 21, 2009 at 10:06 AM

“WE OWE U THNX”

blatantblue on July 21, 2009 at 10:07 AM

YEAH!! You’re back. I was at school (South Korea) trying to get a brief news update and you were offline. Michellemalkin.com too. I thought you were banned by my liberal coworkers somehow or registered as a hate site which happened to LGF when it was still relevant.

When I came back to my small apartment, you were still offline.

Welcome to see you back. You’re one of my favourite sites on the web.

All of you have a great day.

Canadian Infidel on July 21, 2009 at 10:09 AM

When can I cash my IOUs? That’s all I care about.

eliminating the Integrated Waste Management Board, which is led by political appointees, many of them former lawmakers, who earn six-figure salaries.

There are a lot of these types of boards. They get over a 100k a year, are not particularly qualified for the job, and generally meet only one day a month. It’s all political patronage. Sickening.

Blake on July 21, 2009 at 10:10 AM

The state will borrow billions from the counties,

The municipal bond mkts will have something to say about that. Also, county pensions are on the lines. Watch for city, town, county bankruptcies in CA. Kicking the can indeed.

JiangxiDad on July 21, 2009 at 10:10 AM

It isn’t a perfect outcome, but it’s about the best I can hope for as a Californian. The opening of off shore drilling is great news. Still, real reform will not be possible until fiscal responsibility becomes fashionable again in the golden state.

Stickeehands on July 21, 2009 at 10:11 AM

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders reached a tentative budget compromise Monday to plug a $26.3 billion deficit by making hefty cuts in education, health and welfare services, and taking billions of dollars from county governments.

In other words, the Dems and their supporters got hosed in this deal. They brought this upon themselves.

Doughboy on July 21, 2009 at 10:11 AM

The legislature agreed to a desperation move as well — drilling for oil off the coast of Santa Barbara:

That’s a good start. But I expect the Feds to shoot that one down somehow.

Can’t wait to see what happens when all those people start trying to collect on their IOUs.

UltimateBob on July 21, 2009 at 10:12 AM

LOL. LIberalism RIP. Born and dies in CA. Last hippy hangs himself.

JiangxiDad on July 21, 2009 at 10:12 AM

Still, not a long term solution. Just a good bandage on a bad wound. They better keep cutting the budget, lest we get right back to this spot again in the near future.

Agreed on the drilling. +1 for common sense.

Thunderstorm129 on July 21, 2009 at 10:13 AM

Well…it’s a start.

Bob's Kid on July 21, 2009 at 10:13 AM

The tentative deal contains about $15 billion in cuts, roughly $4 billion borrowed from local governments and the rest from various accounting gimmicks that include early collection of taxes, increasing withholdings and shifting $1 billion worth of state workers’ pay from the last day of this fiscal year to the next.

Personally, the gimmicks are what annoy me. Taking $1B out of the picture by simply moving the payroll a day is absurd. I suppose it is the best that could be hammered out with the welfare/entitlement culture that permeates California but the real road to fiscal responsibility does not lead through the crap they are congratulating each other about in Sacramento this morning.

highhopes on July 21, 2009 at 10:13 AM

A “Profile in Courage” moment!

Well, maybe not so much.

mankai on July 21, 2009 at 10:14 AM

Have they learned how to hide the budget numbers a la Barack Obama?

VibrioCocci on July 21, 2009 at 10:15 AM

They still need to deal with the illegal aliens. If they are allowed to enforce immigration law, they’ll find it much easier to balance the budget.

ThackerAgency on July 21, 2009 at 10:16 AM

Wee ahh heeeaa too reedoooze our budgit

blatantblue on July 21, 2009 at 10:17 AM

Why do coastal states get the oil revenues anyway from offshore drilling? What kind of legal claim does a state have to the sea? That $ should go to every state.

JiangxiDad on July 21, 2009 at 10:17 AM

They still need to deal with the illegal aliens. If they are allowed to enforce immigration law, they’ll find it much easier to balance the budget.

ThackerAgency on July 21, 2009 at 10:16 AM

When things finally get bad enough, they’ll hang the aliens out to dry. Idealism is all fun and games until the jig is finally up. Then everyone starts acting like adults again. For a minute or two, at least.

Thunderstorm129 on July 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM

In Home Support Services…face deep cuts as well.

People like the idea of this kind of program: helping older people stay in their homes rather than be placed in a nursing home.

But the reality is that a large percentage of the people who are recipients of the programs could use family monies or equity to pay for their care.

keebs on July 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM

This is only temporary until La Raza threatens violence if California taxpayers don’t give in to what they want.

darwin on July 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM

Why do coastal states get the oil revenues anyway from offshore drilling? What kind of legal claim does a state have to the sea? That $ should go to every state.

JiangxiDad on July 21, 2009 at 10:17 AM

Actually the revenue sharing issue was a big deal about 3 years ago. States were not getting what they considered their “fair share.”

highhopes on July 21, 2009 at 10:20 AM

They still need to deal with the illegal aliens. If they are allowed to enforce immigration law, they’ll find it much easier to balance the budget.

ThackerAgency on July 21, 2009 at 10:16 AM

26 billion dollar deficit minus 12 billion in cuts. My math says 14 billion unfunded and to be borrowed. Isn’t a fix. If Barry wants to be reelected, he must have hisp. vote in CA. Even with this “solution,” he may have lost CA.

JiangxiDad on July 21, 2009 at 10:20 AM

All of that for a small change in the budget…these guys are unbelievable.
And Arnold saying it was like a “suspense movie”…no a movie is not real. That is how a politician thinks, this is all one big movie, and no one is really affected.
They don’t live the day to day lives of normal people…that was decades ago before the drugs and steroids.

right2bright on July 21, 2009 at 10:20 AM

Please dear God I hope that have not cut the budget for the Bureau of Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation.

WashJeff on July 21, 2009 at 10:21 AM

highhopes on July 21, 2009 at 10:20 AM

but wasn’t that a complaint from the coastal states that they weren’t getting enough? I’m wondering why they get any. Why does a state have natural resource rights to the sea off their coasts? Those waters are US waters, I thought.

JiangxiDad on July 21, 2009 at 10:21 AM

That will raise $100 million a year, which the Drill Here – Drill Now contingent has insisted would help the state balance its budget while lowering the cost of energy and providing jobs.

I thought oil and coal = bad. Wind and Sun = Good.

So things get tough and California follows “stupid” Palin, not “brilliant” Obama. I laugh. LOL.

ROCnPhilly on July 21, 2009 at 10:22 AM

shifting $1 billion worth of state workers’ pay from the last day of this fiscal year to the next

This is one of my all time favorite tricks of the trade. I remember the Fed Govt doing it years ago when I was in the military. Paydays used to be the 15th and 30th back then. Now, the 1st and 15th.

BierManVA on July 21, 2009 at 10:22 AM

Give us time. We’ll screw it up!!

exhelodrvr on July 21, 2009 at 10:23 AM

Why do coastal states get the oil revenues anyway from offshore drilling? What kind of legal claim does a state have to the sea? That $ should go to every state.

JiangxiDad on July 21, 2009 at 10:17 AM

They have claim to the continental shelf. What is called “sphere of influence”. Mean tide and out x miles, as well as public access to all beaches.
There are no private beaches in California.

right2bright on July 21, 2009 at 10:24 AM

Cutting education and prison system, while leaving many unnecessary state agencies around.

A triumph for big government.

V-rod on July 21, 2009 at 10:24 AM

California’s budget is so dire we have no choice but to shrink government and lower taxes. California’s recovery will be a road map for the nation. You’re welcome America!

Theworldisnotenough on July 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM

I am absolutely astounded, flatly amazed, that they agreed to open up the offshore oil drilling. That ’69 spill off the coast of SB was a HUGE story at the time, with sensational coverage similar to the one in Alaska in the early 90s. I really didn’t believe the Sierra Club types would ever give in on this, and something tells me there will still be a lot of fights to get through before it really starts happening.

jwolf on July 21, 2009 at 10:26 AM

Kicking some of the problems down the road has worked well for the federal government…

myrenovations on July 21, 2009 at 10:27 AM

Canadian Infidel on July 21, 2009 at 10:09 AM

Ditto.

Theworldisnotenough on July 21, 2009 at 10:27 AM

California’s budget is so dire we have no choice but to shrink government and lower taxes. California’s recovery will be a road map for the nation. You’re welcome America!

Theworldisnotenough on July 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM

uh..what? California creates it’s own mess, then barely puts a band-aid on it and you say that’s a road map and Cali is owed thanks??

That’s rich!

Thunderstorm129 on July 21, 2009 at 10:28 AM

You know they are desperate when they finally listen to the voters. Damn peasants ruining it for their betters.

rbj on July 21, 2009 at 10:28 AM

Why do coastal states get the oil revenues anyway from offshore drilling? What kind of legal claim does a state have to the sea? That $ should go to every state.

JiangxiDad on July 21, 2009 at 10:17 AM

It is generally considered their resource, much like as on land. The US is the only country I know of that gives mineral (resource) rights to private property owners. If oil is found on your land in other countries, it belongs to the government, but here it belongs to the land owner, or the state if it is located on state property. The feds just get a cut of the proceeds. I believe the line where the state no longer has rights is 12 miles offshore.

Vashta.Nerada on July 21, 2009 at 10:29 AM

Why do coastal states get the oil revenues anyway from offshore drilling? What kind of legal claim does a state have to the sea? That $ should go to every state.

JiangxiDad on July 21, 2009 at 10:17 AM

Totally disagree. They should get a majority of the money, BUT should not receive federal money for things like disaster relief. FOr example, I think Floridians would drill for oil pronto if they got to keep funds from the oil drilling and know that NO huricane funds were going to come from the feds.

Being from NE Illinois, the safest area in the US from natural disasters, I do not want to fund people in the SE who choose to live in huricane areas…just get me your oil!!!!

WashJeff on July 21, 2009 at 10:29 AM

Whoopee!! HA is back! Now I have to start working on my apparent addiction. I didn’t exactly panic, but it was close. Checked in a AoS and was told HA was “purging undesirables”, had been hacked for posting negatives about Sarah Palin, etc. It’s a jungle out there! Sorry for the OT.

zeebeach on July 21, 2009 at 10:30 AM

but wasn’t that a complaint from the coastal states that they weren’t getting enough? I’m wondering why they get any. Why does a state have natural resource rights to the sea off their coasts? Those waters are US waters, I thought.

JiangxiDad on July 21, 2009 at 10:21 AM

The State Dept. of Fisheries controls fishing off the coast. The State controls river run-off, pollution (State Water Resources Board), it controls access to harbors, and all harbors, it licenses all commercial activity in the “sphere”, just like Florida, and every other state.

Santa Barbara islands are part of Santa Barbara County, Catalina is part of L.A. County, the harbor districts along with the state resources patrol those areas.

right2bright on July 21, 2009 at 10:30 AM

The book California wants doesn’t want you to read: 2008 California Piglet Book

VibrioCocci on July 21, 2009 at 10:31 AM

Oil, huh?

God they must be desperate.

drjohn on July 21, 2009 at 10:31 AM

ummmmm…I don’t think so…..with 26 Billion in debt, they only reduced the budget by 15 billion……that is not fixing anything……unless you are OBAMA

SDarchitect on July 21, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Oil, huh?

God they must be desperate.

drjohn on July 21, 2009 at 10:31 AM

My thoughts exactly. Took them long enough.

zeebeach on July 21, 2009 at 10:33 AM

Hmm – I was wrong. Texas and Florida get 10 1/2 miles, most everyone else gets 3 1/2.

The Supreme Court finally decided the issue on 31 May 1960 when it ruled that Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana owned the rights to the offshore lands for a distance of 3.5 miles (5.6 km), and Texas and Florida owned rights to tidelands within three leagues, or approximately 10.5 miles (16.9 km), from their coastline boundaries (United States v. States of Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida). In the case of Texas, the claim to special boundary limits had been recognized by Congress in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848, which ended the Mexican-American War. The ruling for Florida was based on congressional approval of Florida’s claims when the state reentered the Union after the Civil War.

Vashta.Nerada on July 21, 2009 at 10:34 AM

ummmmm…I don’t think so…..with 26 Billion in debt, they only reduced the budget by 15 billion……that is not fixing anything……unless you are OBAMA

SDarchitect on July 21, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Politicans all take a special accounting class…

ladyingray on July 21, 2009 at 10:34 AM

So while we’re all shocked that Cali opens itself up for offshore drilling to put money on the books, let’s get back to reality.

How do the leftist liberals stop the drilling? Don’t tell me they aren’t already planning a protest to save the wild sea urchins who just happen to live where drilling is about to take place.

Thunderstorm129 on July 21, 2009 at 10:35 AM

I believe the line where the state no longer has rights is 12 miles offshore.

Vashta.Nerada on July 21, 2009 at 10:29 AM

That varies, Catalina is over 20 miles from shore, some of the Santa Barbara Islands as far.
In the 20′s, the 12 mile limit was “international”, and rum runners would run out in the Catalina channel and supply boats with booze. Catalina had a casino because it was in “international” waters. But all that changed and maps were drawn up.
I can’t find any references, but it varies as to what is incorporated.

They even have “state parks” in the ocean off of California, and state protected eco zones.

right2bright on July 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM

Cutting education and prison system, while leaving many unnecessary state agencies around.

A triumph for big government.

V-rod on July 21, 2009 at 10:24 AM

California’s 2010 budget is estimated to be short by 39 billion, that’s 35% of the budget. The shrinking of big government is inevitable. Massive layoffs are predicted.

Theworldisnotenough on July 21, 2009 at 10:37 AM

It’s no fix because they still use overestimates of tax revenues and underestimates of future bond rates.

But at least they didn’t raise taxes.

Chris_Balsz on July 21, 2009 at 10:38 AM

This will only work if this happens .No fires, no new hires, no one in the state on medical gets sick ,no new food stamps no one attempt to cash there IOU, and no state worker get paid with real money for the next 26 weeks. Calf. the land of milk and honey .The late great Golden state.(RIP)

thmcbb on July 21, 2009 at 10:38 AM

Personally, the gimmicks are what annoy me. Taking $1B out of the picture by simply moving the payroll a day is absurd. I suppose it is the best that could be hammered out with the welfare/entitlement culture that permeates California but the real road to fiscal responsibility does not lead through the crap they are congratulating each other about in Sacramento this morning.

highhopes on July 21, 2009 at 10:13 AM

It’s a gimmick that’s over 40 years old — New York City under John Lindsay and comptroller Abe Beame did that back in the 1960s, eventually moving the budget period for the city’s school system back by three days in order to take some of next year’s revenue to balance this year’s budget. Of course, that would catch up with the city when Beame was mayor in the mid-70s and faced bankruptcy before getting bailed out by the state.

California’s already floated the idea of a federal bail-out, something even Obama knew not to touch back in the spring. But if they get hooked on making the state’s revenue year 366, 367 or 368 days long to steal next year’s $$$ for this year, they’re going to be right back in the hole a few years down the line.

jon1979 on July 21, 2009 at 10:40 AM

Secede… declare independence… AND START PRINTING MONEY!

mankai on July 21, 2009 at 10:40 AM

The plug for the $26 billion hole involves a series of major budget cuts as well as every accounting gimmick imaginable, but at least thus far no tax increases.

There is no way in hell that California’s budget woes are over. Ed’s got it right about accounting gimmicks. As a Cal native, this democratic legislature will find every way possible to disguise raising revenues by “special hidden rate increases” on all types of services. You don’t just wipe out a 26 billion dollar deficit overnight. Obama should put Schwarzenegger on TV tomorrow night to sell his “health care snake oil” if you believe California’s problems are over.

Rovin on July 21, 2009 at 10:42 AM

I thought oil and coal = bad. Wind and Sun = Good.

So things get tough and California follows “stupid” Palin, not “brilliant” Obama. I laugh. LOL.

ROCnPhilly on July 21, 2009 at 10:22 AM

The list of She told you so’s getting longer.

the_nile on July 21, 2009 at 10:43 AM

Glad to hear they a squiming their way through this time.

But I sure hope they get alot of infrastructure work done in CA and the other big blue states as part of the porkulus.

It may become very difficult for them to raise money in the future.

A kool aid chugger was telling me the other day that he doesn’t want to be on a bridge that collapses due to “Hannity listeners” like me being paranoid a bout “big government”. I let him know that bridge collapses may become a serious problem 10-20 years from now when our credit is trashed and were flat broke due to today’s spending.

forest on July 21, 2009 at 10:44 AM

I believe the line where the state no longer has rights is 12 miles offshore.

Vashta.Nerada on July 21, 2009 at 10:29 AM

That varies, Catalina is over 20 miles from shore, some of the Santa Barbara Islands as far.
In the 20′s, the 12 mile limit was “international”, and rum runners would run out in the Catalina channel and supply boats with booze. Catalina had a casino because it was in “international” waters. But all that changed and maps were drawn up.

However, Santa Barbara has a unique lease set up, for just a few miles between tideland and the continental shelf.
Here

right2bright on July 21, 2009 at 10:44 AM

Today, CA’s pension fund, CALPERS, is expected to announce a $56.8 billion loss.

ICBM on July 21, 2009 at 10:47 AM

The most interesting part of the agreement was the reopening of Santa Barbara’s coastline to off-shore drilling.

Now maybe I won’t lose my $50 board shorts from crude oil seeping through the sand whenever I hit the surf off SB.

CA: Loser lawmakers in a loser state fed upon by loser libs.

jbh45 on July 21, 2009 at 10:48 AM

They didn’t really plug their hole. Part of their solution is early collection of taxes.- Tax revenues will be lower than they project, and they’re likely just moving that shortfall into the future.

Glad to see they’re considering drilling though. CA has a wealth of untapped natural resources. Why not use them when you need them?

Maybe once they get used to cutting stuff, it’ll catch on until Californians enjoy low taxes, and the freedom to succeed or fail on their own.

hawksruleva on July 21, 2009 at 10:49 AM

Today, CA’s pension fund, CALPERS, is expected to announce a $56.8 billion loss.

ICBM on July 21, 2009 at 10:47 AM

Shhhh! We’re not supposed to know about that. Pension funds are really just a slush fund for government to pull from. You know, like Social Security. It’s not like the people who pay in have any right to expect getting the money back. Or at least that’s how the Supreme Court ruled for SS back in the day.

hawksruleva on July 21, 2009 at 10:51 AM

Boy, I never thought I would see the day that CA would start drilling their own oil. Now that they are doing it, it’s time our state did it. I hope this is the beginning of the snow ball that will encourage other states to start drilling.

BetseyRoss on July 21, 2009 at 10:52 AM

uh..what? California creates it’s own mess, then barely puts a band-aid on it and you say that’s a road map and Cali is owed thanks??

That’s rich!

Thunderstorm129 on July 21, 2009 at 10:28 AM

California’s recovery is what happens when liberals are able to finally drive off the cliff. For years Republicans were only good at jerking the wheel at the last moment to avoid disaster. Let them drive off the cliff. Republicans will be emboldened by the hard right turn California has to take to get out of the hole.

For years the GOP has been too scared to speak the truth and rely on principles. When California has to use those principles to save itself, the ideology of the left will discredited. If California is able to get a part time legislature the victory will be even larger. Think about it the bluest state in the union will have slashed the size of its government, lowered its taxes, opened up drilling and reduced its legislature to part time status. If that doesn’t give the GOP a boost nothing will.

Just watch the political debate that follows. The GOP will be flogging California for political purposes for years to come.

Theworldisnotenough on July 21, 2009 at 10:52 AM

For years the GOP has been too scared to speak the truth and rely on principles. When California has to use those principles to save itself, the ideology of the left will discredited.

Theworldisnotenough on July 21, 2009 at 10:52 AM

I really really hope you’re correct. But I doubt the media will play the story that way, so only the folks who do the work of finding out the truth on their own will get a clue. That leaves out a majority of voters, who will be disgruntled at losing thier free lunch.

hawksruleva on July 21, 2009 at 10:56 AM

The most interesting part of the agreement was the reopening of Santa Barbara’s coastline to off-shore drilling.

Lawsuits to block this starting in 5,4,3…..

ICBM on July 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM

…eliminating the Integrated Waste Management Board, which is led by political appointees, many of them former lawmakers, who earn six-figure salaries.

Hah!

cntrlfrk on July 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM

Theworldisnotenough on July 21, 2009 at 10:52 AM

I see your point now but there is a major flaw in your logic. California isn’t yet moving in the direction you think they are. This is a band-aid. I seriously doubt they are able to drill a drop before they are attacked non-stop by some group. I also doubt they will find the other 10s of billions they need to actually balance the budget. Then, even if they do, I doubt they will continue to spend wisely.

Sure, it hurts their credibility but to say liberals are going to stop being liberals because of some negative signs before some large numbers is like saying a crack fiend is going to stop using crack because he OD’ed. History proves otherwise.

Thunderstorm129 on July 21, 2009 at 11:03 AM

Guess they’re not desperate enough yet to include sizeable tax cuts for Californians, to stimulate the economy and stop the hemorrhaging of businesses moving to other low-tax friendly states.

KendraWilder on July 21, 2009 at 11:09 AM

The plug for the $26 billion hole involves a series of major budget cuts as well as every accounting gimmick imaginable…

So the budget crisis has not been fixed…. just postponed.

Stay tuned…

Paul the American on July 21, 2009 at 11:11 AM

Did they do one single thing to make the state attractive to new business here? I’m betting NO. Morons.

Patrick S on July 21, 2009 at 11:14 AM

Drill baby drill!

(Yeah, I don’t know if it’ll actually happen, but just getting it in the plan is HUGE.)

cs89 on July 21, 2009 at 11:14 AM

So the budget crisis has not been fixed…. just postponed.

Stay tuned…

Paul the American on July 21, 2009 at 11:11 AM

It’s been “fixed” the same way that organized crime fixes fights…

hawksruleva on July 21, 2009 at 11:14 AM

The most interesting part of the agreement was the reopening of Santa Barbara’s coastline to off-shore drilling. That will raise $100 million a year, which the Drill Here – Drill Now contingent has insisted would help the state balance its budget while lowering the cost of energy and providing jobs.

I hate to throw cold water at Ahnold, but if memory serves, Obama and company already made UltimateBob’s fears real and reinstated the federal offshore drilling ban.

steveegg on July 21, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Now all we have to do is vote out the ‘incumbents’ in 2010.

GarandFan on July 21, 2009 at 11:19 AM

It’s been “fixed” the same way that organized crime fixes fights…

hawksruleva on July 21, 2009 at 11:14 AM

Exactly…and whomever posted lawsuits beginning regarding drilling is right on.
There will be no drilling, with all the EPA reports, lawsuits, delays, it won’t happen.

right2bright on July 21, 2009 at 11:21 AM

How is a shell game fixing anything? That’s what this compromise is.

lorien1973 on July 21, 2009 at 11:25 AM

How is a shell game fixing anything? That’s what this compromise is.

lorien1973 on July 21, 2009 at 11:25 AM

Shush your mouth! It’s a secret.

Loxodonta on July 21, 2009 at 11:28 AM

They’ll be back again in a few months. CA’s economy is in the sh1tter and our dumb Controller (John Chiang-D of course) can’t forecast the sun rising tomorrow and have been awful at predicting how bad the economy is.

Apologetic California on July 21, 2009 at 11:29 AM

Did they do one single thing to make the state attractive to new business here? I’m betting NO.

Patrick S on July 21, 2009 at 11:14 AM

Considering they are congratulating themselves over a plan that cost shifts $1B in payroll costs to next year’s budget (where all this will recur) this is not a long-term strategic budget. All they did was plug the holes in a leaky bucket before the creditors stopped even taking IOUs.
And for that, they are acting as if they are the smartest people on the planet.

highhopes on July 21, 2009 at 11:30 AM

Apologetic California on July 21, 2009 at 11:29 AM

I’m still convinced that the California Dems are banking on a “too big to fail” bailout from the filthy liar’s administration. They’ve fixed it in the short-term but when the wheels come off this time next year with mid-term elections looming you can bank on the fact that the administration will provide a bailout.

highhopes on July 21, 2009 at 11:33 AM

A proposition is in the works to change the constitution for California to restore the legislature to part time.

More about it here.

First we docked their pay, next we limit their time. If we could get them to wear dunce caps, I’d vote for that as well.

kurtzz3 on July 21, 2009 at 11:36 AM

Vashta.Nerada on July 21, 2009 at 10:34 AM

Tks for your info.

JiangxiDad on July 21, 2009 at 11:36 AM

perhaps they will open the entire coast and revive the oil-production industry in the state, and keep that cycle of jobs and energy going.

Don’t hold your breath.

johnnybgood on July 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM

NOT SO FAST……

BigMike252 on July 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Not so Fast……
Other areas of interest require attention ASAP!

Illegal Immigrant Issue(s)
Renegotiate Employee Contracts w/Union

BigMike252 on July 21, 2009 at 12:43 PM

This “solution” is going to blow up in a couple of years, when the money they are borrowing from cities and every trust fund they can find, has to be repaid.

MarkTheGreat on July 21, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Since the 1970′s we have developed newer technologies that could be used to increase oil production without increasing the number of oil rigs. With lateral drilling capability, we could drill several new wells from existing platforms in several different directions rather than adding new platforms.

Also, wells could be drilled from on shore to reach oil that isn’t far offshore. These wells could be enclosed in a building and hidden from view. Any unused big-box stores for sale near the coast? Several wells could be placed in one of those and could act as “containment” buildings in case of a spill, hide the wells from view, and not create any additional environmental impact.

crosspatch on July 21, 2009 at 12:46 PM

early collection of taxes, increasing withholdings and shifting $1 billion worth of state workers’ pay from the last day of this fiscal year to the next.

Pulling next years revenue into this year will decrease available revenue next year.
Increasing withholdings will result in bigger tax returns next year.
Delaying the payroll will decrease this years budget, but increase next year’s budget.

Less money next year, more expenses.

I fully expect this whole train wreck to repeat itself next year.

MarkTheGreat on July 21, 2009 at 12:47 PM

LOL. LIberalism RIP. Born and dies in CA. Last hippy hangs himself.

JiangxiDad on July 21, 2009 at 10:12 AM

This scenario would be a dream come true for me…

Liberty or Death on July 21, 2009 at 12:54 PM

The tentative deal contains about $15 billion in cuts, roughly $4 billion borrowed from local governments…

Is that like “borrowing” my neighbor’s car without his permission? It’s not stealing if I bring it back, right?

Socratease on July 21, 2009 at 1:30 PM

…. and shifting $1 billion worth of state workers’ pay from the last day of this fiscal year to the next.

They have still incurred the liability at the end of the year. This just pushes that portion of the debt off on another governor.

Harpoon on July 21, 2009 at 2:55 PM

…. Last hippy hangs himself

They’ll do anything to create more stink.

Harpoon on July 21, 2009 at 2:57 PM

“I will pay you Thursday for a hamburger today”

right2bright on July 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM

Comment pages: 1 2