States hardest hit get least amount of Porkulus money
posted at 10:55 am on July 20, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Last week, the Obama administration attempted to spin the failure of Porkulus by claiming that they never meant their stimulus bill to actually stimulate the economy. Republicans howled with laughter, but according to a new study by economist John Lott at Fox News, that may be more true than even the White House would like to admit. Lott discovered that the money from Porkulus went not to the states that needed it the most, but rather to those that needed it least:
The stimulus bill “includes help for those hardest hit by our economic crisis,” President Obama promised when he signed the bill into law on Feb. 17. “As a whole, this plan will help poor and working Americans.”
But FOXNews.com has analyzed data tracking how the stimulus money is being given out across the 50 states and the District of Columbia, and it has found a perverse pattern: the states hardest hit by the recession received the least money. States with higher bankruptcy, foreclosure and unemployment rates got less money. And higher income states received more.
The transfers to the states having the least problems are large. Even after accounting for other factors, each $1,000 in a state’s per capita income means that the state got $21 more per capita in stimulus funds. With a spread of almost $38,000 in per-person income between the top and bottom states, this has a sizable impact. High-income states get considerably more stimulus money.
States with higher bankruptcy rates got a lot less, not more, money — roughly $86 less per person for each percentage point increase in the state’s bankruptcy rate. States with higher foreclosure rates were treated very similarly, losing $82 per person for each one percentage point more of the people suffering foreclosures.
Again, just as with other questions from the lack of impact Porkulus has had on the economy, it goes back to its design. Very little in this bill provided real, short-term stimulation, and even that was based less on regional need than on overall tax breaks for individuals and businesses. Most of the money got spent in Year 2 and afterwards, and of that money spent in Year 1, most came in block grants to states. States applied for the money based on their lists of “shovel-ready projects,” but the block grants have funded few of those.
The administration made its decisions on block grants based on its own calculus, which Lott reveals as rather inept. If the plan was to buffer states from the effects of high foreclosures or bankruptcies, the administration failed utterly to target those issues. However, Lott discovers that it’s not based on political support either:
In our results, Obama’s share of the vote accounted for only a small percentage of the variation in how the stimulus money is being allocated. A one percentage point increase in Obama’s vote share means an additional $13.52 in per capita spending, but even then the relationship rests on the large amount of money given to D.C.
Breaking down the data by type of spending shows that money for infrastructure was much more likely than social spending to go to high-income states with low bankruptcy and foreclosure rates. Federal spending on construction and repairs to federal buildings as well as repairs to highways and public transit projects drives much of this perverse relationship between economic distress and infrastructure stimulus spending.
Basically, we’re talking about a pattern of pork distribution. States with higher per capita income levels and better economies produce better contributors, which get pork-barrel projects assigned back home. It underscores why we called this Porkulus — it’s not a stimulus package at all, but an omnibus pork-barrel bill sold as a stimulus by both Congress and the White House. It’s economic snake oil, and the only people getting rich off of it are the snake-oil salesmen.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
I wonder whether Dem states got more cash than GOP states.
jgapinoy on July 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM
A little off topic but good stuff….she must be spinning in her grave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMTDaVpBPR0&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fboortz.com%2Fnealz_nuze%2F2009%2F07%2F14%2F&feature=player_embedded
jsunrise on July 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM
I just wish we’d seen this coming.
LibTired on July 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Please put these folks in charge of improving our health care and saving the environment.
hawksruleva on July 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM
another expiration date to add to the ever growing list…
cmsinaz on July 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM
And we knew this from the beginning. There was never any doubt that this was anything but the filthy liar and his corrupt party rewarding thier contributors and (I’m sure) getting some of that “generosity” funnelled back into their campaign coffers.
Nice to see the numbers point out the graft and corruption of the Democrat Party.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Go ask that bear taking a dump in the woods.
Chainsaw56 on July 20, 2009 at 10:59 AM
$10 says Year 2 and Year 3 stimulus funds approval gets “allocated” to pay for health care. Pansy Republicans look like they did something and Dems still get socialism, just using it on a different failed program than stimulus.
KDB on July 20, 2009 at 11:00 AM
is anybody really surprised by this?
SHARPTOOTH on July 20, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Track the pork through ivy league lawyers.
MarkT on July 20, 2009 at 11:05 AM
I want one of those jobs that will cost the taxpayers $8,000,000 per employee and disappear in a year!
Stimulate this, Barry!
profitsbeard on July 20, 2009 at 11:06 AM
The Health Care Bill will use the same calculus as porkulus.The Dems will be treated, the Repubs will get sicker.
fourdeucer on July 20, 2009 at 11:08 AM
Yes, but if you analyzed states by how much canned pork or processed cheese they needed, or by how many doors and dumbwaiters needed to be fixed, you would see that the stimulus funding was right on target.
Bishop on July 20, 2009 at 11:08 AM
Obama is a lying piece of chicago thuggery.
Why would this surprise anyone?
Its just like the Annenburg challenge money distribution.
YOu had to know this is how he would operate.
The sooner you morons who voted for this rat sh!t traitor wake up and vote him out of office the sooner the adults can get back to work fixing this country that the Manchurian a$$hole candidate is trying to destroy from within.
BillaryMcBush on July 20, 2009 at 11:08 AM
isn’t that what all republicans in washington are these days? a bunch of lazy, coward ass pansys that are slaves to the left and political correctness that won’t stick up for this country.
Ghoul aid on July 20, 2009 at 11:08 AM
The real name for Porkulus is and always has been “The Re-elect Obama 2012 fund.” I bet anything the states that got the least money are also those that went red in November.
Dark Star on July 20, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Thanks for the chuckle. Not too many of them these days.
forest on July 20, 2009 at 11:11 AM
It’s as if they never really had a well thought out plan and just rammed the darn thing down our throats.
/sarc
The Stimulus was nothing but a huge campaign contribution to the Democrats. It’s all about getting re-elected. Period.
Notice how the donks in congress are rebelling because they see their poll numbers dropping. That points to possibly losing the next time around. So truth be told, they aren’t bucking Obama health care now because they see flaws in it, they see a sure sign they could ultimately be replaced in the next electionif the bill passes.
They care about them, not us.
It’s not about human survival, it’s about political survival.
fogw on July 20, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Republicans spent like drunken sailors, but now the Democrats are like the teens with the key to a fully stocked liquor cabinet.
But we get the hangover.
rbj on July 20, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Where the hell is Allahpundit? Does he work here anymore?
Jaibones on July 20, 2009 at 11:18 AM
“States with higher per capita income levels and better economies produce better (and bluer) contributors”
burt on July 20, 2009 at 11:19 AM
After we get puked on as Ogabe tells us, “I looove you maaaan, yer the best buddy I everrrrr had.”
Bishop on July 20, 2009 at 11:19 AM
How could you have? I’m just blindsided.
Wait…
Jaibones on July 20, 2009 at 11:20 AM
I wonder whether Dem states got more cash than GOP states.jgapinoy on July 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM
In my opinion, as it did with FDR and the New Deal, more will go to the swing states. Reds will never go Dem and Blues are already his.
Caper29 on July 20, 2009 at 11:20 AM
Sorry next time I’ll preview…..
Caper29 on July 20, 2009 at 11:21 AM
LOL
cmsinaz on July 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM
I’m SHOCKED! “Porkulus” was not a stimulus? Do you mean Barry, Nancy and Harry LIED to us?
GarandFan on July 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM
They are looking at the wrong patterns. Take a look at union membership percentages, liberal local government, etc. and a pattern will emerge.
Vashta.Nerada on July 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM
Anyone who thought this bill would stimulate anything other than payola networks and consolidate power under The One was sorely mistaken.
Obama is grabbing as much power as he can before anyone realizes what is happening.
Neo on July 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM
I saw some liberal talking-head, discussing the failure of this stimulus package with Laura Ingram on O’Reilly the other night, actually say that it takes time to get “shovel-ready projects” ready. I can’t believe Laura didn’t take her head off over that one.
PatMac on July 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM
If it wasn’t meant to stimulate, then what was it meant to do? It was meant to spend money and damage the economy.
Strategy for forcing political change through orchestrated crisis: the “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6967
Daggett on July 20, 2009 at 11:23 AM
Somehow I think Obama’s “all-Obama-all the time” plan of getting out ahead of the week and driving the message is not working out so well for him.
msmveritas on July 20, 2009 at 11:23 AM
Where’s the $$$ for road construction? I was in Michigan this weekend. I saw 2 of the Wreckovery.gub signs along I-69 between Lansing and Flint, but there was no work going on. Those roads are atrocious.
FYI….My hometown has had a 30% drop in population since 1980.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on July 20, 2009 at 11:27 AM
How is what they are doing now different from what they would do IF they were implementing that Strategy?
Chainsaw56 on July 20, 2009 at 11:29 AM
Take here, give there, offer no reward. Where have we heard that before? Oh….the Tariff of Abominations, 1828.
Before anyone jumps down my throat I don’t claim that slavery was the root cause of the rebellion. But the massive amounts of Southern dollars flowing and little to no northern dollars flowing south was the dry corn field just waiting for a lit match.
Limerick on July 20, 2009 at 11:32 AM
People should have seen this coming as far back as July 2008!
The Emperor has no clothes!
The Suit is indeed empty!
pilamaye on July 20, 2009 at 11:32 AM
was the root cause of the rebellionwasn’t the root cause of the rebellion
fixed it for me ;(
Limerick on July 20, 2009 at 11:33 AM
Spending money where it is needed the least.
Sound like good ole horse sense to me.
VibrioCocci on July 20, 2009 at 11:33 AM
I opened my wallet this morning. All the money was gone!
But, there were little piles of Unicorn poop in the corners!?!
Yoop on July 20, 2009 at 11:35 AM
You will be recieving a carbon-tax bill for the poop.
Sincerely,
IRS
Rovin on July 20, 2009 at 11:41 AM
As the President says, “WE WON”.
But we were RIGHT.
McCain would have been wrong too.
barnone on July 20, 2009 at 11:43 AM
You just voted to not allow yourself to ever vote again. Most of us here did see this coming and have been screaming our bloody heads off at people like you to absolutely no avail.
doriangrey on July 20, 2009 at 11:54 AM
I didn’t see it coming either, I wish I hadn’t attended the rallies or voted for Ogabe.
Bishop on July 20, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Remember Obama telling Arizona to shut up and take the money?????
MSNBC
Looks like Uncle Sugar just forced Arizona to close the door on mining jobs.
Attaboy, Barry! You’ll show ‘em!
Limerick on July 20, 2009 at 11:57 AM
I just got Granholmed out of Michigan. What I want to know is why it is that the size of the state government hasn’t gone down in proportion to the exodus of people forced to relocate for work. Seems to me you don’t need as many people at the Secretary of State’s offices, for example, when fewer people need tags.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 11:58 AM
John Lott has the annoying habit of laying out the numbers, without political editorializing, and letting those numbers tell the story. Liberals hate that because it forces them to their fallback position of ad hominem attacks to weakly blunt the truth.
SKYFOX on July 20, 2009 at 12:01 PM
It will be interesting to see what kind of questions he gets at his presser. If, by some chance, the media smells blood in the water and starts asking real questions instead of questions that, planted or not, merely give the filthy liar an opening to spew more of his lies.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 12:02 PM
FIFY
chemman on July 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Little off topic, but check out the FOOD FIGHT on Drudge!
JetBlast on July 20, 2009 at 12:18 PM
here are some questions i would ask:
1) you know Joe Biden is a dumb ass, right?
2) will you be sending Joe packing wrapped up in some sort of health scare or something?
3) what size strap on does your amazon wife use when the two of you have sex?
4) what’s the next country you be taking your wife and children to see next?
5) and finally Mr. President, can we see that Birth Certificate????????
Ghoul aid on July 20, 2009 at 12:18 PM
A point I wish I had time to investigate:
Is it possible to find out how many of the 9,000+ pork projects in the stimulus bill have been funded versus supposed actual stimulus projects that still are awaiting money?
I wonder if ANY pork has already been funded… which would certainly maky many heads EXPLODE in frustration.
cannonball on July 20, 2009 at 12:23 PM
is what they are doing now different from what they would do IF they were implementing that Strategy?
Chainsaw56 on July 20, 2009 at 11:29 AM
I can’t think of a thing. The point is to drive the country into financial collapse, incite panic and then “rescue” it by suspending the constitution and imposing a radical socialist agenda (forcing political change).
How would you crash the economy and create panic? Here’s what I’d do:
1. Spend as much money as possible, but NOT on the private sector — focus only on wasting the money (grow the debt) or growing government (porkulus, cap-and-traitor, Obamacare, etc)
2. Increase unemployment to agitate unrest and insecurity
3. Increase and invent new entitlements and agitate people to demand their fair share (overload the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands)
4. Seize control of the treasury, banking, credit, and compensation so I could control how the economy reacts to everything
5. Fix the next election in case it takes more than 4 years to bring the nation to the breaking point (ACORN fraud, census, health care for illegal immigrants, etc)
Daggett on July 20, 2009 at 12:28 PM
journeyintothewhirlwind on July 20, 2009 at 12:33 PM
The Chicago Way…but he is soooooo cooooool…
d1carter on July 20, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Pretty much by definition, “shovel ready” projects will not benefit from the porkulus.
The work necessary to get projects from the planning stage to “shovel ready” isn’t done until after the funding for the project is guarenteed.
MarkTheGreat on July 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM
5. Fix the next election in case it takes more than 4 years to bring the nation to the breaking point (ACORN fraud, census, health care for illegal immigrants, etc)
Daggett on July 20, 2009 at 12:28 PM
>>>>
I wonder if he won’t give up his Blackberry because it has the certified results for 2012 on it already – like his BFF Zelaya’s did.
justincase on July 20, 2009 at 12:44 PM
Barack Obama doesn’t care about other people.
bluelightbrigade on July 20, 2009 at 1:11 PM
So President Obama finally decided to do something Biblical (verse 26). Let’s hope he stops before verse 27.
brambo_42 on July 20, 2009 at 1:18 PM
Ironically, Drudge reports that $millions of Porkulus funds have been spent to buy ham, at about twice the amount per pound that I could buy the same items at the local supermarket.
Also, another $1.5 million will go to fix a back door in Texas. (That must be some back door!)
LASue on July 20, 2009 at 1:20 PM
“wasting the money” – I don’t know, they are spending it on Ham and other necessary projects.
Nah, they there’s no way they could do that…… except for hamstringing the free market so much, or taking money out of the economy with confiscatory taxation, or driving businesses into the ground. Besides that, they can’t do anything of the sort.
You mean like O’crap care and other programs? Nah! Couldn’t be.
Well, that’s only in select parts of the banking and financial industry – I’m sure that WON’T affect what others in that segment would do…
That remains to be seen – they have to get those laptops back from Zelaya.
Chainsaw56 on July 20, 2009 at 1:21 PM
Though the “Cloward-Piven Strategy” isn’t new to me, I followed Daggett’s link anyway. You never know when you’ll learn something new, which I did, or when you’ll see something old in a new way, which I also did.
Cloward and Piven came up with a theory that has only been tested halfway. Yes, their ideas about using “community organizers” and leftist media to grow the demands of the welfare state have succeeded in draining resources of cities and states to the point of bankruptcy. Some areas have fought the overgrowth back, but there will be a point of no return, should we prove unable to root out the abettors and stop them, and we could see them reach their goal of complete collapse.
The second part of this theory, however, has not yet been tested, and that second part is the whole point of the thing. They predict that overloading the system to the point of collapse will create a crisis that empowers the poor to have their demands met, through redistribution of wealth.
I’m not so sure that this second prediction will prove as accurate as the first. They seem to disregard some important variables, in a way that’s similar to Charles Manson’s theory.
Manson wanted to start a race war that would ultimately lead to personal power for himself. His theory rested on the shaky foundation of his own prejudices; first, that blacks would win a physical confrontation with whites, owing to his belief in their physical superiority to whites, and second, that victorious blacks, in the aftermath of the race war, would need to turn to a white man to lead them, due to his belief in their mental inferiority. Following this fuzzy equation on the board, he had one of those, “a miracle occurs” formulas, in which he – and he alone – of all white men, somehow manages to emerge unscathed from the carnage, at that magical moment when the triumphant blacks are realizing that they can’t survive without the help of a white man.
Manson is insane, no doubt, but Cloward and Piven make a curiously similar leap. Nowhere do they account for the actions and reactions of middle America while their little plan is unfolding. It seems just as likely to me that, should the ACORNS and World Workers Party types succeed in breaking our economy, that the middle to upper class taxpayers would be given exactly the shot of adrenaline they need to fight back. C&P envision small government officials, panicked, primed to allow unfettered government power to seize and redistribute the wealth of the populace. Really? Maybe, but it seems more likely to me that, faced with economic collapse and mobs of the poor threatening violence, the much more populous middle would grab their shotguns, pitchforks, shovels – whatever they have – and fight back hard.
These people are too in love with the French Revolution to see some basic differences. The French didn’t have a middle class to speak of, and the poor outnumbered the aristocracy by a large margin. The Russian revolution had a similar demographic. The closest thing to a middle class in either country consisted of farmers and merchants that worked long hours for the little extra that they had, and were too few and vulnerable against a lower class that was also used to hard labor, for basic subsistence.
Compare these groups with America’s poor and middle class. The working poor in this country are few, and they don’t ally themselves with the poor of the welfare state. Cloward and Piven rely on a romantic idea of a noble, poor but honest, working hard for every scrap, poverty class, that only exist in their imaginations. Their imaginary poor would fight hard for their “community organizer” leaders, with persistence, dedication, and courage. Huh? The first riot in which the welfare state poor attempt to loot the working poor and middle class will not necessarily end in the helpless and frightened middle class turning to their government, willing to fork over their cash to be redistributed to the aggressors. It might just end with the working poor and middle class taking out their pent-up frustration and anger on the welfare class, and the government that created them. I can’t really see the government created sheep going into battle with fortitude, determined to win what’s rightfully theirs. It seems more likely that, after looting some TVs and liquor stores, and stomping a few innocent people to death, they’ll need a few days off and some paid vacation time. The warrior class that the left is trying to create is unused to enduring hardship, or working at anything, which is a fairly fatal flaw in the whole plan.
I kind of like the idea that ACORN could be working towards their own destruction, even though I know the reality would be too ugly and brutal to take pleasure in. Still, at least we’d know that they, very deliberately, brought it on themselves, in an attempt to destroy the rest of us in an ugly and brutal way.
ral514 on July 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Interesting analysis. You may be correct in many respects – the leftists have some pretty wrong ideas – as to whether they are insane?
Consider the following quote:
The likelihood that their strategy originally conceived in 1966, could work is highly doubtful.
Only thing is that we still have to endure the possibility? Of them attempting it anyways.
Chainsaw56 on July 20, 2009 at 2:37 PM
If the vast majority of the funds haven’t been spent how do they reach conclusions like this about the program? The spending thus far has mostly been related to extensions of existing programs.
lexhamfox on July 20, 2009 at 3:49 PM
I hope you just forgot your /sarc flag – because many of the conservatives saw it, knew it for crap, and yelled to our congress people back in Jan/Feb – but it still got rammed down our throats by the pack of idiots led by the Chicago thug.
MidWestFarmer on July 20, 2009 at 4:37 PM
Ack – wrong quote
Correct tirade tho – carry on.
MidWestFarmer on July 20, 2009 at 4:38 PM
“we are not red states and blue states but the United States of America”—ooooops—nevermind, we are red states and blue states.
Dollayo on July 20, 2009 at 9:57 PM
Comment pages: